Skip to main content
The Open Biomedical Engineering Journal logoLink to The Open Biomedical Engineering Journal
. 2010 Feb 4;4:39–46. doi: 10.2174/1874120701004020039

An Electrode Array for Limiting Blood Loss During Liver Resection: Optimization via Mathematical Modeling

RM Strigel 1, DJ Schutt 2, JG Webster 3, DM Mahvi 4, D Haemmerich 2,5,*
PMCID: PMC2840609  PMID: 20309395

Abstract

Liver resection is the current standard treatment for patients with both primary and metastatic liver cancer. The principal causes of morbidity and mortality after liver resection are related to blood loss (typically between 0.5 and 1 L), especially in cases where transfusion is required. Blood transfusions have been correlated with decreased long-term survival, increased risk of perioperative mortality and complications. The goal of this study was to evaluate different designs of a radiofrequency (RF) electrode array for use during liver resection. The purpose of this electrode array is to coagulate a slice of tissue including large vessels before resecting along that plane, thereby significantly reducing blood loss. Finite Element Method models were created to evaluate monopolar and bipolar power application, needle and blade shaped electrodes, as well as different electrode distances. Electric current density, temperature distribution, and coagulation zone sizes were measured. The best performance was achieved with a design of blade shaped electrodes (5 × 0.1 mm cross section) spaced 1.5 cm apart. The electrodes have power applied in bipolar mode to two adjacent electrodes, then switched sequentially in short intervals between electrode pairs to rapidly heat the tissue slice. This device produces a ~1.5 cm wide coagulation zone, with temperatures over 97 ºC throughout the tissue slice within 3 min, and may facilitate coagulation of large vessels.

INTRODUCTION

Liver (or hepatic) resection (i.e. surgical removal of part of the liver containing a tumor) remains the primary treatment option for long-term disease-free survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer or primary liver cancer [1, 2]. In 2007, primary liver cancer was diagnosed in 19,100 patients in the United States and was responsible for 16,800 deaths. Further it is estimated that there were 153,800 new cases of colorectal cancer in the United States and 52,200 deaths [3]. Approximately 50 to 60% of patients with colorectal cancer will develop metastatic disease to the liver at some point during the course of their illness and of those patients 10 to 25% will be candidates for surgical resection [4]. The outcome of untreated liver cancer is poor, with a five-year survival rate of 0 to 1% [2]. Five-year survival rates following liver resection are between 27 and 43% [2].

The principal cause of morbidity and mortality after liver resection is related to intraoperative bleeding [5-7], which is due to the large number of highly perfused vessels that are present in the liver. Blood loss has been significantly reduced during the recent decades using a variety of techniques [5, 6, 8]. However, blood loss still remains a concern, with typical blood loss in recent studies of 425 mL to 1100 mL during liver resection [2, 8, 9]. Blood loss has been correlated to reduced patient survival, especially in cases of high blood loss where blood transfusion is required [6, 10-14]. Transfusions are still required in 18 to 47% of patients [2, 6, 10, 15-17], and cause complications likely due to immune system reactions. Patients requiring blood transfusion have a decreased long-term survival, increased risk of perioperative mortality, higher complication rate, longer length of hospital stay, and increased risk of infectious complications [17].

Tumor ablation techniques are currently used to locally treat cancer by heating the tumor by radiofrequency (RF) current or microwaves. Several groups suggested the use of ablation techniques for a different application - to assist with liver resection [7, 18-21]. Surgical resection is performed along a plane of healthy liver tissue, the so-called resection plane. Ablative techniques can assist in limiting blood loss by coagulating a slice of tissue in the resection plane (i.e. ablating healthy tissue, contrary to heating the tumor as performed during conventional tumor ablation), before cutting the tissue along that plane. This technique may also decrease tumor recurrence because by heating the resection plane, a sterile margin between the cancerous (to be removed) part of the liver, and healthy liver is created [7]. Current ablation devices for tumor ablation are optimized to create a spherical coagulation zone, 3-5 cm in diameter. Coagulating a slice of tissue therefore requires inserting, withdrawing, and reinserting a conventional ablation electrode multiple times to create a slice of coagulated tissue [7, 21]. This can be time consuming, with one study citing a mean of 30 radiofrequency applications, 4 min each for RF-assisted resection [18]. Nevertheless, this technique has the potential to limit interoperative blood loss to a minimum. Zhou et al. [7] compared microwave assisted liver resection with a control group and demonstrated that the microwave coagulation group experienced less blood loss and fewer transfusions. In a more recent study, Weber et al. [21] used RF assisted resection in 15 patients undergoing hepatic wedge resections (i.e. a wedge of liver is resected). They used RF needle electrodes employing multiple insertions and ablations to create a confluent slice of coagulated tissue, and achieved average blood loss of 30 mL; no blood transfusions were required.

We present a new device that consists of a linear array of electrodes (Fig. 1), which are placed in the resection plane (see Fig. 3) to coagulate this tissue plane. We use the finite element method (FEM) to investigate different electrode array designs, and electrode types (Fig. 2). The electrode array is placed in the resection plane (Fig. 3), and can potentially coagulate a 1-2 cm wide slice of tissue within ~3 min.

Fig. (1).

Fig. (1)

Linear array of needle electrodes.

Fig. (3).

Fig. (3)

Geometry for typical resection plane in the liver, with inserted blade electrode array (only part of the blades in the tissue are shown; actual electrodes extend beyond tissue).

Fig. (2).

Fig. (2)

Blade electrode with 5 × 0.1 mm cross section (left), and needle electrode with 1.2 mm (18 gauge) diameter (right), both 50 mm long.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We investigated different designs to obtain a coagulation zone of 1-2 cm width throughout a slice of liver tissue. We determined this width to enable easy cutting along the coagulation zone without sacrificing too much healthy tissue. To ensure coagulation of large vessels, we attempted to obtain as high tissue temperatures as possible throughout the tissue slice. Current RF devices can only coagulate vessels that are close to the electrode, and up to a maximum of 3 mm in diameter [22]. We investigated arrays of both needle and blade shaped electrodes (see Fig. 2). We investigated the following designs:

Monopolar 6-Electrode Array

Monopolar application of RF energy (i.e. between the electrodes, and a dispersive electrode) is the standard method, but may have limitations for this application since little power is deposited between closely spaced electrodes [23], as in a multi-electrode array.

Bipolar 2-Electrode Array with Needle Electrodes

Bipolar voltage application preferentially heats tissue in-between electrodes, resulting in possibly higher tissue temperatures and improved performance in terms of vessel coagulation.

Bipolar voltage could be applied to a multi-electrode array with alternating poles (e.g. for 6 electrodes: +,–,+,–,+,–); however, that would not allow independent control of power for each electrode as is required to adjust for tissue thickness, local differences in perfusion, etc.

Bipolar 2-Electrode Array with Blade Electrodes

Blade electrodes cause more tissue damage during insertion but have more uniform power deposition between electrodes, and may provide higher temperatures in-between electrodes than with needle electrodes.

Effect of Electrode Spacing for Bipolar Electrode Arrays

Bipolar voltage application is most effective if electrodes are spaced very closely. With increasing electrode spacing the tapering of the coagulation zone in-between electrodes increases. We investigated different electrode distances to determine ideal spacing to create a coagulation zone of even thickness.

Rapid Switching of Bipolar Voltage for 6-Electrode Array

To extend bipolar voltage application from a 2-electrode array to multiple electrodes, we used rapid switching of voltage application between adjacent electrodes. Power is applied for 1 s between electrodes 1 and 2, for 1 s between electrodes 2 and 3, and so on (see Fig. 4). This method has the advantage of enabling control of deposited power between each pair by changing the time period of voltage application. Independent control of each pair is necessary to control power depending on tissue thickness, and vicinity to large vessels.

Fig. (4).

Fig. (4)

Voltage is applied between adjacent electrode pairs and sequentially switched between different pairs in a round-robin fashion.

Material Properties

Healthy liver tissue was modeled with the tissue properties as shown in Table 1. For electrical tissue conductivity, we used values from in vivo measurements since electrical conductivity changes rapidly when tissue is removed from the body [24]. Electrical conductivity was assumed to be temperature dependent, with a temperature coefficient of 1.5%/ºC [25]. At 100 ºC, vaporization occurs, gas forms, and an electrically insulating layer is created. To account for this phenomenon, a rapid linear drop in tissue conductivity by a factor of 10,000 between 100 ºC and 102 ºC was assumed, which limits any further power deposition by RF energy above boiling temperatures. In addition, a latent heat associated with water vaporization of 2,257 J/kg was assumed at 100 ºC.

Table 1.

Tissue Properties

Electrical Conductivity 0.33 S/m at 37 ºC
Density 1060 kg/m3
Specific Heat 3600 J/(kg . K)
Thermal Conductivity 0.512 W/(m . K)

Joule Heating and the Bioheat Equation

Joule heating arises when the energy dissipated by an electric current flowing through a conductor is converted into thermal energy. The heating of liver tissue during radiofrequency ablation, and cooling due to blood perfusion is governed by the bioheat transfer equation [26].

ρcTt=.kT+JEhbl(TTbl)hbl=ρblcblwbl (1)

where ρ is the density (kg/m3), c is the specific heat (J/kg.K), k is the thermal conductivity (W/m.K), J is the current density (A/m2) and E is the electric field intensity (V/m). Tbl is the temperature of blood, ρbl is the blood density (kg/m3), cbl is the specific heat of the blood (J/kg.K), and wbl is the blood perfusion (ml/ml/s). hbl is the convective heat transfer coefficient accounting for the blood perfusion. Electric field intensity E, and current density J are related by electrical conductivity σ according to (2).

J=Eσ (2)

Blood Perfusion

To obtain results comparable to in vivo experiments, perfusion has to be included in the models. Perfusion was modeled according to the bioheat equation as a distributed heat sink. We assumed perfusion of 1 L/kg/min [25]. We further assumed cessation of perfusion once tissue was coagulated (i.e. above 60 ºC).

It is well known that tissue damage depends on both temperature and time [27]. However, previous studies have shown that for ablative therapies isotherms give reasonable estimates of tissue damage [28]. In this study we are interested in the region of tissue coagulation, which is smaller than the region where tissue damage occurs. Since protein coagulation occurs around 60 ºC [29], we used this temperature to estimate the boundary of the coagulation zone.

Model Geometry

The geometry of the electrode array is shown in Fig. (1) for an array of needle electrodes. Arrays were created of needle electrodes (1.2 mm diameter, 18 gauge), and blade shaped electrodes (5 × 0.1 mm rectangular cross section), (see Fig. 2) at different distances. Distances between electrodes are measured from electrode centers. Since tissue thickness is large compared to electrode diameter, we can assume uniform power distribution and tissue temperature along the electrode axis, allowing us the use of 2-D models. The electrode arrays were placed centered into a tissue block of 100 × 200 mm cross-section, and RF frequency at 500 kHz was applied to the electrodes.

All models included blood perfusion until 60 ºC as described above. Initial tissue temperature was 37 ºC, which is human in vivo body temperature. Body temperature was also assigned to the model boundary as thermal boundary condition. Monopolar models were constructed by applying a ground potential to the outer boundary of the model and a positive potential to the electrode. Bipolar models were constructed by applying ground potential to one electrode and a positive potential to the neighbor electrode (see Fig. 4). For all models we determined current density profile, and temperature profile for up to 3 min. Since the absolute current density changes according to applied potential, we show current density values relative to maximum current density. We terminated the simulations at 3 min, since no significant change in tissue temperature was observed after this time.

FEM modeling was conducted using the commercial FEM software package ABAQUS 6.3 (Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen, Inc., Pawtucket, RI). ABAQUS/CAE was the preprocessor used to create models. For analysis, ABAQUS provides a coupled thermal-electrical analysis to account for problems including joule heating; the thermal and electrical equations are solved simultaneously for both temperature and electric potential at the nodes. ABAQUS/POST was used for postprocessing. FORTRAN subroutines were used as necessary to model nonuniform variations in loads or applied potential. The models utilized linear, 3-noded triangular elements. Models possessed a fine mesh near the electrodes (0.4 mm), which became increasingly coarse near the outer tissue boundary (total of ~8000 elements). Convergence studies were performed to ensure that the mesh was appropriately sized. Analysis was performed on a SUN Blade 100 workstation with 1 GB of RAM and 30 GB of hard disk space.

6-Electrode Array with Monopolar Voltage Application

Models were created to evaluate the efficacy of monopolar voltage application (i.e. same voltage applied to all electrodes in array). Models included 1.2 mm diameter (18 gauge) needle electrodes at 1.5 cm distance, placed in healthy liver tissue (200 mm × 100 mm). The model included six electrodes arranged in a linear array. The applied voltage was temperature controlled by a PI control algorithm (controller constants kp=1.08, ki=0.07) that adjusted the applied voltage to keep the maximum tissue temperature at a target temperature of 95 ºC for a total of 3 min, similar to a previous study [30]. The control parameters (kp, ki) were chosen by trial and error to obtain set temperature within 30 s, and limit overshoot to 5 ºC.

Two-Electrode Arrays with Bipolar Voltage Application

This model included two electrodes (either 1.2 mm diameter needle, or 5 × 0.1 mm blade electrodes) placed 1.5 cm apart. Voltage was applied between the two electrodes (i.e. bipolar), and controlled by a PI control algorithm (controller constants kp=1.0, ki=0.04) to keep maximum tissue temperature at a target temperature of 95 ºC for a total of 3 min. Control parameters were chosen as described above.

Electrode Shape and Spacing with 2-Electrode Arrays and Bipolar Voltage Application

Needle and blade electrode arrays were compared at spacings of 1, 1.5, and 2 cm with voltage applied between electrodes (i.e. bipolar). We determined center temperature, and coagulation zone width (see Fig. 5) after 30, 60, 120 and 180s.

Fig. (5).

Fig. (5)

Measured parameters: Width of coagulation zone is measured at 60 ºC temperature contour, and center temperature is measured between electrodes as demonstrated in this figure.

Rapid Switching of Voltage Application Between Adjacent Electrodes

We have previously used a rapidly switched power application scheme to heat multiple RF electrodes simultaneously [23, 31]. In similar ways, we used rapid switching between adjacent electrode pairs (Fig. 4) to heat tissue between each electrode pair. We created a 2-D model of a linear electrode array of six blade electrodes, separated at 1.5 cm. The application scheme involved applying voltage between two adjacent electrodes for a designated amount of time, then switching to the next pair of adjacent electrodes, and so on.

In our model of 6 electrodes numbered sequentially, voltage was applied in bipolar mode between electrodes 1 and 2 for 1 s., then between electrodes 2 and 3 for 1 s, etc (see Fig. 4). This continued until electrodes 5 and 6 were activated for 1 s, at which time the voltage was again applied between electrodes 1 and 2 and the cycle was repeated, for a total of 3 min. We could not apply the temperature control algorithm in this model, since tissue between each electrode pair cools down when no voltage is applied. A much shorter switching interval would be required, which is not feasible due to computational limitations. Therefore as a simplification we applied a constant potential Vel to one electrode and a constant potential of 0 V to the other electrode. We used trial and error to determine the potential Vel = 110 V that would give us maximum tissue temperature of close to 100 ºC at the end of the simulation.

Limitations

Several limitations in our models may result in inaccuracies. In the models we assume uniform tissue perfusion; in reality perfusion varies widely in the liver depending on location, with less perfused areas near the periphery and higher perfusion at the center. In our models we assumed tissue to be homogenous. In reality the liver is a very heterogenous organ, with blood vessels, bile ducts etc. which may result in less uniform temperature distributions than shown in the models. When tissue vaporizes above 100 ºC, gas bubbles are likely to move due to pressure buildup. We do not consider this effect in our models. Another effect we were not able to include in our models is tissue charring. This happens when very high temperatures are obtained close to the electrodes; a charred area develops around the electrodes, which acts electrically insulating and prevents further deposition of energy into the tissue (charred in this context does not equate carbonized tissue, since carbon is an electrically good conductor).

RESULTS

Monopolar 6-Electrode Array

Fig. (6) shows the cross-sectional temperature profile after 3 min for monopolar voltage application. Fig. (7) shows the corresponding current density profile. Temperature at the center between electrodes after 3 min was 52 ºC. Since all electrodes are at the same electric potential, little electric current flows between electrodes resulting in reduced temperatures in-between electrodes.

Fig. (6).

Fig. (6)

Array of six needle electrodes at 1.5 cm distance, with voltage applied in monopolar mode (same voltage to all electrodes). Figure shows temperature contour at 3 min. Center temperature of 52 ºC (arrow) due to reduced inter-electrode heating.

Fig. (7).

Fig. (7)

Array of six needle electrodes at 1.5 cm distance, with voltage applied in monopolar mode (same voltage to all electrodes). Figure shows relative current density profile. Monopolar application results in reduced heating between electrodes (arrows) since electrodes are at same electrical potential.

Bipolar 2-Electrode Arrays

Figs. (8 and 9) show the cross-sectional temperature profile after 3 min bipolar voltage application for needle, and blade electrodes, respectively. Center temperature was 83 ºC for needle electrodes, and 97 ºC for blade electrodes.

Fig. (8).

Fig. (8)

Two needle electrodes at 1.5 cm distance, with voltage applied in bipolar mode (between electrodes). Figure shows temperature contour at 3 min.

Fig. (9).

Fig. (9)

Blade electrodes at 1.5 cm distance, with voltage applied in bipolar mode (between electrodes). Figure shows temperature contour at 3 min.

lectrode Shape and Spacing with 2-Electrode Arrays

Needle and blade shaped electrode designs were compared at spacings of 1, 1.5, and 2 cm. Coagulation zone width was measured as the minimum diameter at the center point between electrodes corresponding to the 60 ºC contour as demonstrated in Fig. (5). Results are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2.

Center Temperature and Width of Coagulation Zone (Center Between Electrodes) for Different Electrode Shapes and Spacings in Bipolar Mode. Width is Measured as Shown in Fig. (5)

Probe Spacing 60 seconds 180 seconds
Type cm Temp. ºC Width mm Temp. ºC Width mm
needle 1 87.6 7.7 91.4 9.7
needle 1.5 63.9 3.4 83.3 9.4
needle 2.0 51.0 0.0* 55.4 0.0*
blade 1.0 97.5 10.6 95.0 10.7
blade 1.5 94.5 12.0 93.5 13.2
blade 2.0 80.8 10.2 93.0 14.0

Rapid Switching with 6-Electrode Blade Array

Fig. (11) shows the temperature profile at 3 min. Temperatures close to 100 ºC are obtained throughout the tissue slice.

Fig. (11).

Fig. (11)

Linear array of 6 blade electrodes at 1.5 cm distance. Voltage is rapidly switched between electrode pairs at 1 s intervals (see Fig. 4). Coagulation zone is ~1.5 cm wide after 3 min.

DISCUSSION

Surgical liver resection is the current standard treatment for both primary and metastatic liver cancer; part of the liver (often one of the two liver lobes) is surgically removed. Unfortunately this operation is still associated with considerable blood loss. We present a new device to assist liver resection that can potentially significantly reduce inter-operative blood loss. The device consists of a linear array of electrodes (see Fig. 1). The electrode array is inserted into the liver in the plane, where resection is intended (Fig. 3), and the tissue plane is coagulated by application of RF energy. Then tissue can be cut along that plane with minimum blood loss. We estimate the necessary width of the coagulation zone for the resection plane to be 1 to 2 cm wide. A coagulation zone that is too wide unnecessarily destroys healthy liver tissue and creates the risk of damage to major vessels, while a coagulation zone of inadequate width could not be effectively transected. We employed FEM computer models to investigate different device designs.

In all models, we applied RF energy for 3 min since tissue temperature does not change significantly after this time. Initially, we investigated monopolar application of RF energy, where the RF voltage is applied between the electrode array and a ground pad. Since all electrodes are at same electric potential, little RF current is deposited in-between the electrodes (Fig. 7). The result is comparably low tissue heating, with a center temperature of 52 ºC between electrodes; this temperature is insufficient to provide tissue coagulation (Fig. 6). When RF energy is applied bipolar between two needle electrodes at same distance as in the monopolar case, much higher tissue temperatures are obtained (Fig. 8) since RF current now flows in-between the electrodes; center temperature was 83 ºC in this case. Note that in Fig. (8) only two electrodes are considered; bipolar power application however can be extended to more than 2 electrodes by rapid switching (Fig. 4) as discussed later.

Apart from needle electrodes, we also investigated blade shaped electrodes (Fig. 2) for bipolar energy application. RF current flow between two large parallel plates and resulting heating pattern are uniform, and two parallel plate electrodes approximate this situation better than needle electrodes. Fig. (9) shows the resulting temperature profile when blade electrodes are used. Notice that tissue temperature is above 95 ºC throughout much of the slice, with center temperature of 97 ºC. Fig. (10) compares the current density through the center line (dotted line in Fig. 5) for monopolar needle, bipolar needle, and bipolar blade electrodes. For monopolar needle electrodes, current density drops rapidly with increasing distance from the electrode. Bipolar application of RF energy improves the current density profile, and the use of blade electrodes in bipolar mode results in significant further improvement. With blade electrodes, a very uniform current density profile is obtained where all tissue within the slice is directly heated by RF energy.

Fig. (10).

Fig. (10)

Relative electric current density through center line between two electrodes (see Fig. 5) 15 mm apart. Blade electrodes with bipolar voltage application deposit power throughout the slice, while bipolar needle, and monopolar needle electrodes only produce heat close to the electrodes. Note that due to different electrode size, surfaces of needle electrodes are at x = 0.6 and 14.4 mm, and surfaces of blade electrodes are at x = 0.05 and 4.95 mm.

Currently clinically used RF devices employ the monopolar method, and are not able to coagulate vessels larger than 3 mm diameter [22]. This limitation is largely due to the fact that the power deposition around the electrode drops rapidly (deposited power around needle electrode is ~1/r2, r = electrode radius). Significant direct heating by RF energy only occurs within a few mm from the electrode for current commercial devices, and most of the coagulation zone is created by thermal conduction from the hot regions next to the electrode. Since it is difficult to coagulate a vessel by thermal conduction from outside while the vessel is cooled by blood flow from the inside, current RF devices can only coagulate small vessels. Two-electrode arrays with closely spaced needle electrodes, and especially with blade electrodes and bipolar voltage application have a current density profile where significant power is deposited throughout the tissue slice (see Fig. 10). Any vessels in this slice are heated directly by RF energy, and not merely by thermal conduction. This should facilitate coagulation of larger vessels than possible with current devices. In addition, the bipolar voltage application eliminates the need for a ground pad. A ground pad limits the amount of power that can be applied to the tissue because of the danger of ground pad skin burns when too much power is used [32]. Current RF devices use up to 200 W power, but we estimate the device described here will require up to 500 W for rapid coagulation of a tissue slice, increasing the risk of ground pad burns. Bipolar voltage application requires electrodes to be parallel for uniform heating between electrodes. Thus a template with rigid control of the distance between electrodes is essential.

We investigated 2-electrode arrays with different electrode distances for needle and blade electrodes with bipolar power application to determine the ideal distance. The distance should be close enough to create a coagulation plane without much tapering between electrodes; the closer the spacing, the more electrodes are required which is undesirable since it makes the usage more complex. We found a spacing of 1.5 cm with blade electrodes to create a coagulation slice of desired width. Whether this electrode configuration is sufficient to coagulate all large vessels in a typical resection plane will have to be determined experimentally. If large vessels cannot be coagulated, an option is to occlude liver inflow to reduce convective cooling. Inflow occlusion is routinely performed during liver resection to reduce blood loss, and can be performed for up to 25 min.

To extend the method of bipolar voltage application from two electrodes to an array of multiple electrodes, we use rapid switching where RF voltage is applied for brief time periods to adjacent electrode pairs. Power is applied to electrodes 1+2 for a brief period (1 s in our models), then to electrodes 2+3, and so on (see Fig. 4). This way we are able to rapidly heat a slice of tissue applying voltage bipolar to all electrodes in the array. Fig. (11) shows that the temperature profile is very uniform with high tissue temperatures close to 100 ºC throughout the slice. In our models we were able to obtain a uniform coagulation slice ~1.5 cm wide within 3 min of application time.

One major risk of this device may be inadvertent damage to critical structures such as the biliary system and the vena cava, which may limit application of the electrode array close to these structures.

CONCLUSIONS

We investigated a linear electrode array for potential application to coagulating a tissue slice for assisting liver resection. We found an array of blade electrodes with RF energy applied between adjacent electrodes and rapid switching between multiple electrode pairs to be superior to using the same method with needle electrodes. Voltage application between adjacent electrodes is superior to monopolar voltage application (i.e. to all electrodes). RF energy is deposited uniformly between the blade electrodes, resulting in high tissue temperatures close to 100 ºC throughout the slice. This configuration produces a ~1.5 cm wide plane of coagulated tissue and may allow for large vessel coagulation.

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, Grants Number R01DK58839, R01CA118990, and Number C06 RR018823 from the Extramural Research Facilities Program of the National Center for Research Resources.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Hanazaki K, Kajikawa S, Shimozawa N, Shimada K, Hiraguri M, Koide N, Adachi W, Amano J. "Hepatic resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma,". Am. J. Surg. Apr. 2001 Apr;181:347–53. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00584-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Harmon K.E, Ryan Jr J.A, Biehl T.R, Lee F.T. "Benefits and safety of hepatic resection for colorectal metastases,". Am. J. Surg. May. 1999 May;177:402–4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)00070-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun M.J. "Cancer statistics, 2007,". CA Cancer J. Clin. 2007 Jan–Feb;57:43–66. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.57.1.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sasson A.R, Sigurdson E.R. "Surgical treatment of liver metastases,". Semin. Oncol. Apr. 2002 Apr;29:107–18. doi: 10.1053/sonc.2002.31676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Buell J.F, Koffron A, Yoshida A, Hanaway M, Lo A, Layman R, Cronin D.C, Posner M.C, Millis J.M. "Is any method of vascular control superior in hepatic resection of metastatic cancers? Longmire clamping, pringle maneuver, and total vascular isolation,". Arch. Surg. 2001 May;136:569–75. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.136.5.569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rees M, Plant G, Wells J, Bygrave S. "One hundred and fifty hepatic resections: evolution of technique towards bloodless surgery,". Br. J. Surg. Nov. 1996 Nov;83:1526–9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800831110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhou X. D, Tang Z. Y, Yu Y. Q, Ma Z. C, Xu D. B, Zheng Y. X, Zhang B. H. "Microwave surgery in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,". Semin. Surg. Oncol. 1993 Jul–Aug;9:318–22. doi: 10.1002/ssu.2980090407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Taniai N, Onda M, Tajiri T, Akimaru K, Yoshida H, Mamada Y. "Hepatic parenchymal resection using an ultrasonic surgical aspirator with electrosurgical coagulation,". Hepatogastroenterology. 2002 Nov–Dec;49:1649–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Melendez J, Ferri E, Zwillman M, Fischer M, DeMatteo R, Leung D, Jarnagin W, Fong Y, Blumgart L. H. "Extended hepatic resection: a 6-year retrospective study of risk factors for perioperative mortality,". J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2001 Jan;192:47–53. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00745-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jarnagin W. R, Gonen M, Fong Y, DeMatteo R. P, Ben-Porat L, Little S, Corvera C, Weber S, Blumgart L. H. "Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade,". Ann. Surg. 2002 Oct;236:397–406. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000029003.66466.B3. discussion 406-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nagasue N, Ono T, Yamanoi A, Kohno H, El-Assal O. N, Taniura H, Uchida M. "Prognostic factors and survival after hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma without cirrhosis,". Br. J. Surg. Apr. 2001 Apr;88:515–22. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01732.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nonami T, Nakao A, Kurokawa T, Inagaki H, Matsushita Y, Sakamoto J, Takagi H. "Blood loss and ICG clearance as best prognostic markers of post-hepatectomy liver failure,". Hepatogastroenterology. 1999 May–Jun;46:1669–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shimada M, Takenaka K, Fujiwara Y, Gion T, Shirabe K, Yanaga K, Sugimachi K. "Risk factors linked to postoperative morbidity in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma,". Br. J. Surg. 1998 Feb;85:195–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00567.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wu C. C, Kang S. M, Ho W. M, Tang J. S, Yeh D. C, Liu T. J, P'Eng F K. "Prediction and limitation of hepatic tumor resection without blood transfusion in cirrhotic patients,". Arch. Surg. 1998 Sep;133:1007–10. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.133.9.1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gozzetti G, Mazziotti A, Grazi G. L, Jovine E, Gallucci A, Gruttadauria S, Frena A, Morganti M, Ercolani G, Masetti M, Pierangeli F. "Liver resection without blood transfusion,". Br. J. Surg. 1995 Aug;82:1105–10. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800820833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jamieson G. G, Corbel L, Campion J. P, Launois B. "Major liver resection without a blood transfusion: is it a realistic objective?,". Surgery. 1992 Jul;112:32–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kooby D. A, Stockman J, Ben-Porat L, Gonen M, Jarnagin W. R, Dematteo R. P, Tuorto S, Wuest D, Blumgart L. H, Fong Y. "Influence of transfusions on perioperative and long-term outcome in patients following hepatic resection for colorectal metastases,". Ann. Surg. 2003 Jun;237:860–9. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000072371.95588.DA. discussion 869-70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pellicci R, Pasqualini M, Stella M, Percivale A. "Radiofrequency Assisted Liver Resection: A New Technical Device,". J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2003;7:279. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(03)00137-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tabuse K, Katsumi M, Kobayashi Y, Noguchi H, Egawa H, Aoyama O, Kim H, Nagai Y, Yamaue H, Mori K, Azuma Y, Tsuji T. "Microwave surgery: hepatectomy using a microwave tissue coagulator,". World J. Surg. 1985 Feb;9:136–43. doi: 10.1007/BF01656265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Weber J. C, Navarra G, Habib N. A, Bachellier P, Jaeck D. "Laparoscopic radiofrequency-assisted liver resection,". Surg. Endosc. 2003 May;17:834. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-4263-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Weber J. C, Navarra G, Jiao L. R, Nicholls J. P, Jensen S. L, Habib N. A. "New technique for liver resection using heat coagulative necrosis,". Ann. Surg. 2002 Nov;236:560–3. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200211000-00004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lu D. S, Raman S. S, Vodopich D. J, Wang M, Sayre J, Lassman C. "Effect of vessel size on creation of hepatic radiofrequency lesions in pigs: assessment of the "heat sink" effect,". AJR. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2002;178:47–51. doi: 10.2214/ajr.178.1.1780047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Haemmerich D, Tungjitkusolmun S, Staelin S. T, Lee Jr F. T, Mahvi D. M, Webster J. G. "Finite-element analysis of hepatic multiple probe radio-frequency ablation,". IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. Aug. 2002;49:836–42. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2002.800790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Haemmerich D, Ozkan O. R, Tsai J. Z, Staelin S. T, Tungjitkusolmun S, Mahvi D. M, Webster J. G. "Changes in electrical resistivity of swine liver after occlusion and postmortem,". Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2002 Jan;40:29–33. doi: 10.1007/BF02347692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Duck F. A. Physical Properties of Tissue. London: Academic Press; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pennes H. H. "Analysis of tissue and arterial blood temperatures in the resting human forearm,". J. Appl. Physiol. 1948;1:93–122. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1948.1.2.93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sapareto S. A, Dewey W. C. "Thermal dose determination in cancer therapy,". Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1984 Jun;10:787–800. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(84)90379-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Graham S. J, Chen L, Leitch M, Peters R. D, Bronskill M. J, Foster F. S, Henkelman R. M, Plewes D. B. "Quantifying tissue damage due to focused ultrasound heating observed by MRI,". Magn. Reson. Med. 1999 Feb;41:321–8. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2594(199902)41:2<321::aid-mrm16>3.0.co;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sherar M. D, Moriarty J. A, Kolios M. C, Chen J. C, Peters R. D, Ang L. C, Hinks R. S, Henkelman R. M, Bronskill M. J, Kucharcyk W. "Comparison of thermal damage calculated using magnetic resonance thermometry, with magnetic resonance imaging post-treatment and histology, after interstitial microwave thermal therapy of rabbit brain,". Phys. Med. Biol. 2000 Dec;45:3563–76. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/12/304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Haemmerich D, Webster J. G. "Automatic control of finite element models for temperature-controlled radiofrequency ablation,". Biomed. Eng. Online. 2005;4:1–8. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-4-42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lee Jr F. T, Haemmerich D, Wright A. S, Mahvi D. M, Sampson L. A, Webster J. G. "Multiple probe radiofrequency ablation: pilot study in an animal model,". J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2003 Nov;14:1437–42. doi: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000096771.74047.c8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Goldberg S. N, Solbiati L, Halpern E. F, Gazelle G. S. "Variables affecting proper system grounding for radiofrequency ablation in an animal model,". J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2000 Sep;11:1069–75. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61341-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Open Biomedical Engineering Journal are provided here courtesy of Bentham Science Publishers

RESOURCES