Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1984 Aug;26(2):192–195. doi: 10.1128/aac.26.2.192

Influence of inoculum size on comparative susceptibilities of penicillinase-positive and -negative Neisseria gonorrhoeae to 31 antimicrobial agents.

W H Hall, B J Opfer
PMCID: PMC284117  PMID: 6435514

Abstract

The effects of two inoculum sizes (10(4) and 10(6) CFU) on the MICs of 20 beta-lactam antibiotics, 4 aminoglycosides, and 7 other antimicrobial agents were compared for 102 unselected strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae (26 penicillinase positive and 76 penicillinase negative), with three replicates for each test. The method was agar plate dilution on Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 1% hemoglobin and 1% IsoVitaleX. For penicillinase-positive strains, a large inoculum (10(6) CFU) increased the MIC greater than or equal to 16-fold for benzylpenicillin, piperacillin, azlocillin, and mezlocillin and increased the MIC greater than or equal to 8-fold for ampicillin, cefoperazone, ceftazidime, cefonicid, and cefamandole. The inoculum size had little or no influence on MICs of any antimicrobial agent for penicillinase-negative strains. For penicillinase-positive strains, the most active antibiotics (MIC, less than or equal to 0.001 microgram/ml) were the new cephalosporins: cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftizoxime, ceftriaxone, and cefmenoxime. For penicillinase-negative strains, the most active antibiotics were piperacillin, ceftriaxone, ceftizoxime, and cefmenoxime (MIC, less than or equal to 0.001 microgram/ml), closely followed by ceftazidime, moxalactam, azlocillin, mezlocillin, and cefuroxime.

Full text

PDF
192

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker C. N., Thornsberry C., Jones R. N. In vitro antimicrobial activity of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, moxalactam (LY127935), azlocillin, mezlocillin, and other beta-lactam antibiotics against Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Haemophilus influenzae, including beta-lactamase-producing strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Apr;17(4):757–761. doi: 10.1128/aac.17.4.757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Biddle J. W., Thornsberry C. In vitro activity of rosamicin, josamycin, erythromycin, and clindamycin against beta-lactamase-nagative and beta-lactamase-positive strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Feb;15(2):243–245. doi: 10.1128/aac.15.2.243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fuchs P. C., Jones R. N., Thornsberry C., Barry A. L., Gerlach E. H., Sommers H. M. Cefmenoxime (SCE-1365), a new cephalosporin: in vitro activity, comparison with other antimicrobial agents, beta-lactamase stability, and disk diffusion testing with tentative interpretive criteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Dec;20(6):747–759. doi: 10.1128/aac.20.6.747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hall W. H., Opfer B. J., Gerding D. N. Comparative activities of the oxa-beta-lactam LY127935, cefotaxime, cefoperazone, cefamandole, and ticarcillin against multiply resistant gram-negative bacilli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Feb;17(2):273–279. doi: 10.1128/aac.17.2.273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hall W. H., Schierl E. A., Maccani J. E. Comparative susceptibility of penicillinase-positive and -negative Neisseria gonorrhoeae to 30 antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Apr;15(4):562–567. doi: 10.1128/aac.15.4.562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kerbs S. B., Stone J. R., Jr, Berg S. W., Harrison W. O. In vitro antimicrobial activity of eight new beta-lactam antibiotics against penicillin-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Apr;23(4):541–544. doi: 10.1128/aac.23.4.541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Khan M. Y., Gruninger R. P., Nelson S. M., Obaid S. R. Comparative in vitro activity of cefodizime, ceftazidime, aztreonam, and other selected antimicrobial agents against Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Mar;23(3):477–478. doi: 10.1128/aac.23.3.477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Khan M. Y., Gruninger R. P., Nelson S. M., Simpson M. L. Comparative in vitro activity of Sch 29,482, a new oral penem, against Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Mar;23(3):481–482. doi: 10.1128/aac.23.3.481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Khan M. Y., Siddiqui Y., Gruninger R. P. Comparative in-vitro activity of selected new beta-lactam antimicrobials against Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Br J Vener Dis. 1982 Aug;58(4):228–230. doi: 10.1136/sti.58.4.228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Khan M. Y., Siddiqui Y., Simpson M. L., Gruninger R. P. Comparative in vitro activity of cefmenoxime, cefotaxime, cefuroxime, cefoxitin, and penicillin against Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Nov;20(5):681–682. doi: 10.1128/aac.20.5.681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Percival A., Rowlands J., Corkill J. E., Alergant C. D., Arya O. P., Rees E., Annels E. H. Penicillinase-producing Gonococci in Liverpool. Lancet. 1976 Dec 25;2(8000):1379–1382. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(76)91919-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rein M. F., Elliott W. C., Swenson J. M., Thornsberry C. Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim synergism for Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Feb;17(2):247–250. doi: 10.1128/aac.17.2.247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rodríguez J., Fuxench-Chiesa Z., Ramírez-Ronda C. H., Kouri Y., Cuevas R., Nevárez M., Pérez M. In vitro susceptibility of 50 non-beta-lactamase-producing Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains to 12 antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Feb;23(2):242–244. doi: 10.1128/aac.23.2.242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Seth A. D. Sensitivity of gonococci to rosoxacin compared with that of penicillin, cefuroxime and tetracycline. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1981 Apr;7(4):331–334. doi: 10.1093/jac/7.4.331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Thabaut A., Durosoir J. L., Saliou P. Comparative in vitro activity of 8 cephalosporins on 109 strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and 60 strains of Neisseria meningitidis. Chemotherapy. 1981;27 (Suppl 1):19–24. doi: 10.1159/000238024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Thornsberry C., Baker C. N., Jones R. N. In vitro antimicrobial activity of piperacillin and seven other beta-lactam antibiotics against Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Haemophilus influenzae, including beta-lactamase producing strains. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1979 Mar;5(2):137–142. doi: 10.1093/jac/5.2.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Yoshikawa T. T., Shibata S. A., Herbert P., Oill P. A. In vitro activity of Ro 13-9904, cefuroxime, cefoxitin, and ampicillin against Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Aug;18(2):355–356. doi: 10.1128/aac.18.2.355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zaidi A. A., Aral S. O., Reynolds G. H., Blount J. H., Jones O. G., Fichtner R. R. Gonorrhea in the United States: 1967-1979. Sex Transm Dis. 1983 Apr-Jun;10(2):72–76. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198304000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES