Abstract
The role of rifampin as an adjunctive agent to vancomycin in the therapy of serious systemic staphylococcal infections remains controversial. Several in vitro studies utilizing differing methodologies to define the bactericidal interactions of vancomycin plus rifampin versus Staphylococcus aureus have yielded markedly disparate results. The in vitro bactericidal synergistic activities of vancomycin plus rifampin were examined versus 48 clinical isolates of S. aureus, both methicillin susceptible and resistant. Each strain was tested simultaneously in timed-kill curve and checkerboard systems. By timed-kill curve, vancomycin plus rifampin usually had either an indifferent (67%) or synergistic (19 to 29%) effect, with a frequency dependent on sampling times; bactericidal antagonism was infrequently noted after 48 h of incubation (4%). Indifference was seen as a prevention of rifampin resistance by vancomycin. Synergy was more commonly noted at 48 than at 24 h of incubation. The bactericidal interaction results were similar for both methicillin-susceptible and -resistant strains. In contrast to the killing curve data, the checkerboard technique uniformly demonstrated bactericidal antagonism of vancomycin plus rifampin against all 48 staphylococci. We conclude that the nature of the in vitro bactericidal interactions of vancomycin plus rifampin against S. aureus is difficult to establish in vitro. This fact relates to the markedly disparate findings, which depended on both the synergy technique utilized and the test system conditions employed. In vivo studies are required to delineate the bactericidal interaction potentials of vancomycin plus rifampin versus S. aureus.
Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50c61/50c61b02097425c92ce12c705c374c89a3555478" alt="220"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a24f/7a24f38d9f3e5c351e5609e37b65011d9eca77f3" alt="221"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc579/dc5796f7b2904a57ab0ce58af64c1c5ad8fd03d3" alt="222"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36f0d/36f0d5c980b76a9c85209c5ad7df0877e04257bc" alt="223"
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Archer G. L., Tenenbaum M. J., Haywood H. B., 3rd Rifampin therapy of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Use in infections from indwelling artificial devices. JAMA. 1978 Aug 25;240(8):751–753. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Canawati H. N., Sapico F. L., Montgomerie J. Z., Zucchero J. Temperature effect on cephalothin sensitivity of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Am J Clin Pathol. 1981 Mar;75(3):391–394. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/75.3.391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Faville R. J., Jr, Zaske D. E., Kaplan E. L., Crossley K., Sabath L. D., Quie P. G. Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. Combined therapy with vancomycin and rifampin. JAMA. 1978 Oct 27;240(18):1963–1965. doi: 10.1001/jama.240.18.1963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karchmer A. W., Archer G. L., Dismukes W. E. Staphylococcus epidermidis causing prosthetic valve endocarditis: microbiologic and clinical observations as guides to therapy. Ann Intern Med. 1983 Apr;98(4):447–455. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-98-4-447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim K. S., Anthony B. F. Importance of bacterial growth phase in determining minimal bactericidal concentrations of penicillin and methicillin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Jun;19(6):1075–1077. doi: 10.1128/aac.19.6.1075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klimek J. J., Marsik F. J., Bartlett R. C., Weir B., Shea P., Quintiliani R. Clinical, epidemiologic and bacteriologic observations of an outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at a large community hospital. Am J Med. 1976 Sep;61(3):340–345. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(76)90370-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Levine D. P., Cushing R. D., Jui J., Brown W. J. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis in the Detroit Medical Center. Ann Intern Med. 1982 Sep;97(3):330–338. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-97-3-330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moellering R. C., Jr Antimicrobial synergism--an elusive concept. J Infect Dis. 1979 Oct;140(4):639–641. doi: 10.1093/infdis/140.4.639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Norden C. W., Wentzel H., Keleti E. Comparison of techniques for measurement of in vitro antibiotic synergism. J Infect Dis. 1979 Oct;140(4):629–633. doi: 10.1093/infdis/140.4.629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pearson R. D., Steigbigel R. T., Davis H. T., Chapman S. W. Method of reliable determination of minimal lethal antibiotic concentrations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Nov;18(5):699–708. doi: 10.1128/aac.18.5.699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sorrell T. C., Packham D. R., Shanker S., Foldes M., Munro R. Vancomycin therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Ann Intern Med. 1982 Sep;97(3):344–350. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-97-3-344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tuazon C. U., Lin M. Y., Sheagren J. N. In vitro activity of rifampin alone and in combination with nafcillin and Vancomycin against pathogenic strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 May;13(5):759–761. doi: 10.1128/aac.13.5.759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Watanakunakorn C., Guerriero J. C. Interaction between vancomycin and rifampin against Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Jun;19(6):1089–1091. doi: 10.1128/aac.19.6.1089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Watanakunakorn C. Treatment of infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Ann Intern Med. 1982 Sep;97(3):376–378. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-97-3-376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]