The investigation of polymer-siRNA nanoparticle for gene therapy of gastric cancer in vitro

Abstract

Small interfering RNA (siRNA) molecules have significant therapeutic promise for the genetic treatment of cancer. To overcome instability and low transfection efficiency, polyethylene glycol-polyethyleneimine (PEG-PEI) was synthesized and investigated as a non-viral carrier of siRNA targeting CD44v6 in gastric carcinoma cells. The size, surface charge using zeta potential, and morphology via scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of PEG-PEI/siRNA nanoparticles was characterized, and their cytotoxicity, transfection efficiency, and interaction with SGC7901 human gastric carcinoma cells was evaluated. The transfection efficiency of PEG-PEI/siRNA nanocomplexes was dependant on the charge ratio between amino groups of PEG-PEI and phosphate groups of siRNA (N/P) values, which reflected the molar ratio of PEG-PEI to siRNA during complex formation. The transfection efficiency of PEG-PEI/siRNA at N/P 15 was 72.53% ± 2.38%, which was higher than that observed using Lipofectamine 2000 and PEI as delivery carriers. Cytotoxicity of PEG-PEI was determined by MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay and was obviously lower than that of PEI. Moreover, when N/P was below 15, PEG-PEI/siRNA was less toxic than Lipofectamine 2000/siRNA. RT-PCR (real time polymerase chain reaction) and Western blot analyses of CD44v6 expression demonstrated the gene silencing effect of PEG-PEI/siRNA at N/P 15. These data indicate that PEG-PEI may be a promising non-viral carrier for altering gene expression in the treatment of gastric cancer with many advantages, such as relatively high gene transfection efficiency and low cytotoxicity.

Introduction

CD44 is a multifunctional cell adhesion molecule and a cell surface receptor of hyaluronan. In addition, it is involved in extracellular matrix binding, cell migration, and lymphocyte homing.¹ There are a number of isoforms of CD44 resulting from alternative splicing, which includes the following: CD44s (the standard form), CD44E (the epithelial form), and CD44v (the variant isoform).² CD44v isoforms, especially CD44v6, play an important role in tumor progression and metastasis of gastric cancer. CD44v6 expression is significantly higher in gastric cancer patients with liver metastasis.³ Moreover, the expression of CD44v6 is an independent risk factor for lymph node metastasis.⁴ Therefore, suppressing CD44v6 expression might postpone or inhibit the invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer.

RNA interference (RNAi) is an effective technology for gene silencing in gene therapy. Since the discovery of its mechanism, small interference RNA (siRNA) has been used for assaying gene function^5,6 and potential therapeutics.^7,8 A growing number of studies have shown its therapeutic promise in treating various diseases, including cancer.⁹ However, siRNA is rapidly degraded and the uptake by target cells and tissues is often low.¹⁰ Therefore, development of an efficient siRNA delivery system is desperately demanded.

Carrier systems are essential to deliver siRNA efficiently and overcome both extracellular and intracellular barriers.¹¹ Liposome and polycationic polymer-based non-viral systems are common methods of delivering siRNA in vitro. As compared with viral delivery, these methods induce less immunogenicity and fewer safety issues.¹² Moreover, polymer-based non-viral vectors have greater advantages than liposomes with respect to safety, convenient large-scale production, and physiological stability. The cationic polymer, polyethyleneimine (PEI) contains primary, secondary, and tertiary amines; therefore, it has the ability to complex with both DNA or siRNA, a characteristic known as the “proton sponge effect”.¹³ Various PEI types (branched and linear) with varying molecular weights (10, 25, 800 kDa) have been successfully used as non-viral gene delivery carriers in both in vitro and in vivo studies. However, PEI-based gene transfection technology may induce cell cytotoxicity, depending on the molecular weight and concentration of the polymer.¹⁴ Therefore, in the present study, we have developed a PEG-modified PEI polymer, which displays reduced cytotoxicity while maintaining considerable gene transfection efficiency.^15–18 Moreover, PEG modification of PEI can increase polymer solubility, protect nanoparticles from macrophage uptake, prolong the circulation time of nanoparticles in vivo, and decrease non-specific interactions with serum protein.^19,20

In this study, we synthesized a PEG-modified PEI copolymer and determined its ability to mediate the delivery of CD44v6 siRNA. PEG (2 kDa) and PEI (25 kDa) were chosen to form the copolymer; their ratio was optimized to reduce cytotoxicity and particle size. In addition, siRNA and PEG-PEI complexes were formed at different N/P ratios (theoretical charge ratio between amino groups of PEG-PEI and phosphate groups of siRNA).^13,21 For low cytotoxicity and high transfection efficiency, PEG-PEI/siRNA, at the most suitable N/P ratio, was selected to transfect SGC7901 human gastric carcinoma cells.

Materials and methods

Materials and reagents

Poly(ethyleneglycol)-polyethylenimine (PEG; 2 kDa and PEI; 25 kDa, respectively) was synthesized by the School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering at Sun Yat-Sen University. (3-(4,5-dimethyl-thiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA). The PrimeScript^™ RT-PCR Kit was purchased from TaKaRa Biotechnology, (Dalian, China). Cell culture medium and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were purchased from GIBCO (Carlsbad, CA, USA). The human gastric carcinoma cell line, SGC-7901, was obtained from the Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology at the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). siRNA targeting human CD44v6, negative control siRNA, and FAM-labeled siRNA were purchased from GenePharma (Shanghai, China). Antibodies specific for human CD44v6 were purchased from Bender MedSystems^® (Vienna, Austria). The following siRNA targeting sequences were used: siRNA-CD44v6, 5′CAG UGG UUU GGC AAC AGA UTT 3′; negative control siRNA, 5′GCG ACG AUC UGC CUA AGA 3′; and FAM-labeled siRNA, 5′UUC UCC GAA CGU GUC ACG UTT 3’.

Cell culture

Human gastric carcinoma SGC-7901 cells were cultured and maintained in high glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum at 37°C in a fully humidified atmosphere of 5% CO₂.

Preparation of PEG-PEI copolymers

Methoxy N-hydroxysuccinimide polyethylene glycol (mPEG2k-NHS) was prepared as described previously.²² To synthesize PEG-PEI, 1.25 g of hyperbranched PEI (25 kDa, Aldrich) and 1.0 g mPEG-NHS was added to phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4). The solution was magnetically stirred at room temperature overnight. The resulting solution was purified by membrane dialysis (molecular weight cutoff: 7 kDa) in distilled water for 48 hours, and then lyophilized to obtain solid PEG-PEI. PEG-PEI was characterized by Proton Nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) in deuterium oxide.

Preparation of siRNA-polymer nanocomplexes

PEG-PEI copolymers were dissolved to yield different concentrations (0.24–1.42 mg/mL), according to various N/P ratios. Appropriate volumes of siRNA (20μM) and PEG-PEI solutions were added to deionized water after which it was gently mixed and incubated 10–15 minutes at room temperature to induce nanocomplex formation.

Zeta potential and size measurements

Nanoparticle size was analyzed using the Zeta-Plus instrument (Brookhaven, NY, USA) at 25°C. Zeta potentials of the nanoparticles were measured using the same instrument at a 45° angle and 25°C. The data represent the average ± standard deviations.

Scanning electron microscopic analysis

The morphology of PEG-PEI/siRNA nanocomplexes was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM; Quanta 400 FEG). Nanocomplexes were deposited onto a coverslip and dried for 2 hours at room temperature. After they were gilded, they were observed in the thermal field of the electron microscope.

Gel retardation assay

Gel electrophoresis was performed to evaluate siRNA condensation. PEG-PEI/siRNA complexes were prepared at different N/P ratios from 5 to 30, and the complexes were loaded onto 1% agarose gels with 6× loading buffer (1 μL) and 10× colloidal gold (1 μL). The mixture was separated in 0.5× Tris/Borate/EDTA (TBE) buffer at 100V for 25 minutes siRNA bands were visualized using an ultra violet (UV) imaging system (Uvidoc, UVItec Ltd, Cambridge, UK).

MTT assay

SGC7901 cells were grown in 96-well plates at an initial density of 9000 cells/well in 200 μL medium and incubated for 24 hours prior to the addition of polymers. The cytotoxicities of PEI and PEG-PEI at different final concentrations were tested. Each concentration was analyzed in triplicate. In addition, the cytotoxicity of PEG-PEI/siRNA at different N/P ratios was also evaluated; Lipofectamine 2000 and PEI (1 mg/mL) were used as controls. Transfection was performed with 20 pM siRNA per well to form the PEG-PEI/siRNA complexes. After additional incubation for 48 hours, the medium was replaced with 200 μL serum-free medium, and 20 μL MTT solution (5 mg/mL) were added per well. After 4 hours, 100 μL of DMSO was added. The plate was agitated for 10 minutes, and the absorbance of each well was recorded with an ELISA reader (Labsystem Dragon, Oy, Finland) at 492 nm. The data from three separate experiments were calculated as a percentage of viable cells over untreated control ± standard deviation.

Transfection efficiency analysis

SGC7901 cells were seeded into 6-well plates at a density of 4 ×10⁴ cells per well before transfection. The PEG-PEI/siRNA complexes were prepared, and according to the N/P ratio, from 5 to 30,100 pM FAM-siRNA and copolymer solution at different concentrations were added into 500 μL PBS. The PEG-PEI/siRNA complexes were gently mixed and incubated for 10–15 minutes at room temperature. The original cell culture media was replaced with 1 mL of fresh and complete DMEM per well. The complexes were added to the well drop by drop and then rocked gently for 5 hours at 37°C after which the transfection media was exchanged with fresh, complete DMEM. The cells were observed under the fluorescence microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan), and images were recorded.

Sixteen hours after transfection, cells were washed with PBS and detached with 0.25% trypsin/EDTA. The cells were washed with PBS and resuspended in 500 μL PBS. The transfection efficiency was evaluated by scoring the percentage of cells with green fluorescence using a FACSCalibur system (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The data were presented as mean ± standard deviation.

RT-PCR analysis

After transfection for 48 hours, RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). RT-PCR using the PrimeScript RT-PCR Kit was performed following the manufacturer’s instructions; 2 μL resulting cDNA were subjected to PCR reactions using specific primers. Negative control (without cDNA) was used to detect possible contamination. PCR reaction was as follows: 30 cycles including 94°C for 30 seconds, 56°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 30 seconds and 1 cycle at 72°C for 7 minutes. PCR products were analyzed on 2% agarose gels. Sequences of the CD44v6 primers were as follows: forward, 5′-GGC AAC TCC TAG TAG TAC AAC-3′ and reverse, 5′-CAG CTG TCC CTG TTG TCG AAT-3′. Sequences of the glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GADPH) primers were as follows: forward, 5′-TTC GAC AGT CAG CCG GAT CTT C-3′ and reverse, 5′-CTT CTC CAT GGT GGT GAA GAC G-3′.

Western blot analysis

After transfection for 72 hours, total protein was extracted in RIPA buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) with protease inhibitors (PMSF). Protein concentrations were measured using the BCA-100 Protein Quantitative Analysis Kit (Shenergy Biocolor, Shanghai, China). Equal amounts of total proteins were separated in 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) polyacrylamide gel and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. The membranes were blocked in 5% nonfat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline tween-20 (TBST) for 2 hours at room temperature and incubated with mouse anti-CD44v6 antibodies (1:1000, Bender, Austria) overnight at 4°C. After three washes with TBST, membranes were incubated with anti-mouse IgG-horseradish-peroxidase (1:5000, Jackson, MI, USA) for 1 hour at room temperature. Enhanced chemiluminescence detection reagent was used, and the protein bands were visualized after exposition with x-ray film. GADPH expression was used as the housekeeping gene control. Images analyses were performed with Quantity One Software.

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as mean ± standard error (SE). All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 11.0 software. analysis of variance (ANOVA) analysis was used, and a P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Syntheses of PEG-PEI copolymers

PEG-PEI was synthesized through the conjugation of PEG-NHS to PEI. 1H NMR analysis of the dialyzed PEI-PEG revealed prominent chemical shift of protons from PEG (—OCH₂CH₂—, 3.65 ppm; CH₃O—, 3.38 ppm) and PEI (—CH₂CH₂NH—, 2.5–2.9 ppm), indicating that PEG chains were successfully grafted onto PEI chains. PEG grafting density of PEI was 9.9 as characterized by 1H NMR (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

1H-NMR spectra of mPEG-COOH (A) and mPEG-PEI (B).

Abbreviation: PEG-PEI, polyethylene glycol-polyethyleneimine.

Size and zeta potential of PEG-PEI/siRNA complexes

The size and zeta potential of PEG-PEI/siRNA complexes varied at different N/P ratios; N/P ratios from 5 to 30 are shown in Table 1. At N/P 5, the size of the nanoparticle was approximately 174.6 ± 1.2 nm. The size reached to 267.7 ± 1.8 nm at N/P 10, then decreased gradually to 192.1 ± 2.8 nm at N/P 30. The size distribution of PEG-PEI/siRNA at N/P 15 is shown in Figure 2; the size distribution of the complexes was between 180 and 242 nm whereas the remaining particles over 800 nm might be not complex well. The zeta potential was negative at N/P 5 and positive at N/P 10, increasing linearly as the ratio of PEG-PEI increased.

Table 1.

The particle size and zeta potential of PEG-PEI/siRNA complexes

N/P ratio	5	10	15	30
Size (nm)	174.6 ± 1.2	267.7 ± 1.8	241.5 ± 3.8	192.1 ± 2.8
Zeta potential (mV)	−5.76 ± 1.1	3.01 ± 0.1	16.0 ± 1.5	26.9 ± 0.8

Abbreviation: PEG-PEI, polyethylene glycol-polyethyleneimine.

Figure 2.

Size distribution of PEG-PEI nanoparticles at N/P 15 measured by Zeta Plus instrument.

Notes: The size distribution of two parts in the graph was respectively 180–242 nm, 845–1130 nm.

Abbreviation: PEG-PEI, polyethylene glycol-polyethyleneimine.

Scanning electron microscope

PEG-PEI/siRNA nanoparticles were well-complexed at N/P 15; therefore these particles were observed under SEM. The nanoparticles appeared spherical, uniform in size, and well-dispersed. The size of the nanoparticles at N/P 15 was approximately 240 nm, which was similar to that measured with the Zeta-Plus instrument (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of PEG-PEI/siRNA nanoparticles at N/P 15 (120000× and 7500× respectively).

Abbreviations: PEG-PEI, polyethylene glycol-polyethyleneimine; N/P, charge ratio between amino groups of PEG-PEI and phosphate groups of siRNA.

Gel retardation assay

The positive charges of PEG-PEI can neutralize the negative charges of the phosphate groups within the siRNA backbone, thus retarding the siRNA mobility (Figure 4). Naked siRNA was used as the control group. siRNA bands decreased with increasing N/P ratios (from 2.5 to 30). When the N/P was 10, the band remained bright and completely disappeared when the N/P was 30, indicating that the negatively charged siRNA could be neutralized entirely at this N/P value.

Figure 4.

Gel electrophoresis of PEG-PEI/siRNA complexes at different N/P ratios.

Notes: Lane1: naked siRNA; Lane 2: PEG-PEI/siRNA at N/P 2.5; Lane 3: PEG-PEI/siRNA at N/P 5; Lane 4: PEG-PEI/siRNA at N/P 10; Lane 5: PEG-PEI/siRNA at N/P 15; Lane 6: PEG-PEI/siRNA at N/P 30.

Abbreviations: PEG-PEI, polyethylene glycol-polyethyleneimine; N/P, charge ratio between amino groups of PEG-PEI and phosphate groups of siRNA.

Cell viability analysis

SGC7901 cells were incubated at different concentrations of PEG-PEI and PEI for 48 hours, and the cell viability was measured using the MTT assay (Figure 5A). Cells incubated with pure media, without treatment, were considered as controls, and the cell viability values was set at 100%. Cytotoxicity of PEG-PEI was lower than that observed with PEI at the same concentrations (P < 0.05). When the concentrations were over 10 μg/mL, increased toxicity was detected with PEG-PEI and PEI. As shown in Figure 5B, the cell viability in the presence of PEG-PEI/siRNA complexes at different N/P ratios was tested after transfection for 48 hours. PEI 25 kDa/siRNA and Lipofectamine 2000/siRNA complexes were used as controls. The cytotoxicity of PEG-PEI/siRNA complexes increased with higher N/P ratios. When the N/P ratio using PEG-PEI/siRNA reached 15, the cell viability was 80.4% ± 5.6%, which was similar to that observed with Lipofectamine 2000/siRNA. When the N/P ratio was 30, the cell viability of cells transfected with PEG-PEI/siRNA was 73.8% ± 4.8%, which was higher than that of PEI/siRNA.

Figure 5a.

Cytotoxicity induced by the polymers of a variety of concentrations in SGC7901 cells (mean ± SD, n = 3, P < 0.05).

Abbreviations: PEG, polyethylene glycol; PEI, polyethyleneimine.

Figure 5b.

Cytotoxicity induced by PEG-PEI/siRNA complexes at different N/P ratios, PEI/siRNA and lipo2000/siRNA complexes after transfection into SGC7901 cells (mean ± SD, n = 3).

Abbreviations: PEG-PEI, polyethylene glycol-polyethyleneimine; N/P, charge ratio between amino groups of PEG-PEI and phosphate groups of siRNA.

In vitro transfection assay

FAM-(carboxyfluorescein)-labeled siRNA was used in formation of the complexes, and transfection efficiency of PEG-PEI/siRNA complexes was evaluated with a fluorescence microscope and flow cytometry in SGC7901 cells. Lipofectamine 2000 and PEI (25 kDa) were used as positive controls. The transfection efficiencies appeared different at various N/P ratios (Figures 6A and 6B); higher N/P ratios resulted in increased transfection efficiencies. For example, at N/P 5, the fluorescence intensity was weakest, increasing from N/P 5 to 30. Lipofectamine 2000 and PEI (25 kDa) also displayed high transfection efficiencies. The transfection efficiency of each group was evaluated in three independent experiments using flow cytometry. As shown in Figure 6B, the transfection efficiencies of PEG-PEI/siRNA at N/P 15 and 30 were 75.5% ± 2.4% and 75.6% ± 9.2%, respectively. Although there was a minor increase, the transfection efficiencies of PEG-PEI/siRNA at N/P 30 were higher than that of Lipofectamine 2000/siRNA and PEI/siRNA.

Figure 6a.

Fluorescence microscope images of SGC-7901 cells transfected with PEG-PEI/siRNA complexes at N/P = 5, 10, 15, 30, PEI (25 KD) and Lipo2000, respectively.

Abbreviations: PEG-PEI, polyethylene glycol-polyethyleneimine; N/P, charge ratio between amino groups of PEG-PEI and phosphate groups of siRNA.

Figure 6b.

The transfection efficiencies of PEG-PEI/siRNA at different N/P ratios (N/P = 5, 10, 15, 30), lipo2000 and PEI (25 KD) measured by flow cytometry (mean ± SD, n = 3).

Abbreviations: PEG-PEI, polyethylene glycol-polyethyleneimine; N/P, charge ratio between amino groups of PEG-PEI and phosphate groups of siRNA; SD, standard deviation.

The gene silencing effect of CD44v6 siRNA

PEG-PEI/siRNA at N/P 15 was chosen for transfection of the SGC7901 cells. The ability of siRNA to reduce CD44v6 mRNA and protein expression was analyzed using RT-PCR and Western blot analysis, respectively. Expression of CD44v6 was down-regulated by siRNA targeted to CD44v6 (Figure 7), indicating that siRNA-CD44v6 could suppress the expression of CD44v6 expression at the mRNA level while the negative control siRNA had no obvious effect on CD44v6 expression. The gene silencing effect of siRNA was further confirmed by Western blot analysis (Figure 8). The expression of CD44v6 protein was decreased using siRNA-CD44v6 to 59.7% ± 3%.

Figure 7.

The result of RT-PCR analysis after transfection with PEG-PEI/siRNA.

Notes: M: marker. From the bottom: 100 bp, 200 bp, 300 bp, 400 bp, 500 bp, 700 bp, 1000 bp. Lane 1: siRNA-CD44v6/PEG-PEI complexes group. Lane 2: negative control siRNA/PEG-PEI complexes group. Lane 3: no treatment group. Lane 4: negative control group without RNA template. GADPH was used as a control.

Abbreviations: PEG-PEI, polyethylene glycol-polyethyleneimine; N/P, charge ratio between amino groups of PEG-PEI and phosphate groups of siRNA; GADPH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

Figure 8.

The result of Western blot analysis after transfection with PEG-PEI/siRNA.

Notes: Lane 1: siRNA-CD44v6/PEG-PEI complexes group. Lane 2: negative control siRNA/PEG-PEI complexes group. Lane 3: no treatment group.

Abbreviations: PEG-PEI, polyethylene glycol-polyethyleneimine; GADPH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

Discussion

RNAi-mediated silencing of important oncogenic regulators plays a major role in cancer therapy. For efficient cancer therapy, siRNA should be stable and efficiently delivered into the target tissue and easily taken up by the cancer cells.²³ In this study, PEG (2 kDa)-PEI (25 kDa) was synthesized to form nanometer-sized complexes with siRNA. Reports have shown that adequate size and positive potential are essential for enhanced delivery of nanoparticles into cells. The size and potential of the complexes below N/P 10 were not suitable for cell transfection (Table 1) because PEG-PEI and siRNA could not form a complex of adequate size and positive potential.

Agarose electrophoresis was used to evaluate siRNA-copolymer affinity. When PEG-PEI/siRNA complexes formed, the negatively charged siRNA could be neutralized by the positively charged polycations. Thus, insertion of colloidal gold into the siRNA was impeded. With N/P ratios increasing, siRNA was complexed more effectively with the polycations; the insertion of colloidal gold into siRNA double-strands was blocked to a higher extent and consequently the brightness of the siRNA bands weakened.²⁴ In this study, at N/P 10, the complete neutralization of the siRNA was observed. At N/P 30, siRNA was entirely wrapped by PEG-PEI, producing a fluorescence quenching phenomenon. Therefore, it could be considered that siRNA was completely complexed with PEG-PEI at N/P ratios ≥10. Interaction of DNA or siRNA with cationic polymers could protect the condensed DNA or siRNA from enzymatic degradation,^25,26 making it more effective for cellular transfection.

Increased transfection efficiency of PEG-PEI/siRNA was observed at higher N/P ratios, reaching the highest transfection efficiency at N/P 15. No major increase appeared at N/P 30 possibly because over-condensation at high N/P values is not favorable for intracellular release of nucleic acids.^27,28

Cytotoxicity of the PEG-PEI/siRNA was also analyzed using the MTT assay. Cytotoxicity induced by PEG-PEI was obviously lower than PEI, which suggests that PEG reduced the toxicity of the heavily cationic PEI portion of copolymer structure.¹³ When the concentration of PEG-PEI in the culture medium was less than 10 μg/mL, the biosafety of this delivery agent was improved. As a non-viral delivery system, Lipo-fectamine 2000 is widely used in studies analyzing RNAi. However, some reports have indicated that Lipofectamine 2000 has a high toxicity.^29,30 In this study, when N/P values were below 15, the cell toxicity of PEG-PEI/siRNA was lower than that of Lipofectamine 2000/siRNA, indicating that PEG-PEI may be a promising non-viral gene delivery carrier with higher transfection efficiency and lower cytotoxicity.

Considering the high transfection efficiency and low cytotoxicity, PEG-PEI/siRNA at N/P 15 this was chosen to transfect SGC7901 cells. RT-PCR and Western blot analyses indicated effective gene silencing of CD44v6 expression in SGC7901 cells when PEG-PEI served as a carrier. The results showed that PEG modified-PEI (25 kDa) delivered siRNA into SGC7901 cells and released them effectively.

Compared with PEI (25 kDa) and Lipofectamine 2000, PEG-PEI has more advantages, such as increased transfection efficiency and improved cell viability. However, this carrier may be further improved. We are dedicated to research on the linkage of single-chain antibody and PEG-PEI (25 kDa). The study will improve the transfection efficiency and minimize the damage of siRNA to normal gastric cells.

Conclusion

In this study, we developed a nano-sized polymeric system for delivering siRNA to inhibit the expression of CD44v6 in gastric cancer cells in vitro. Compared with Lipofectamine 2000 or PEI (25 kDa), the copolymer had advantages such as low cytotoxicity, high transfection efficiency, low cost, with easy adjustment of its structure. Thus, PEG-PEI might be a promising gene carrier for siRNA in gene therapy of gastric cancer. Moreover, this study provided a foundation for related research on PEG-PEI/siRNA nanoparticles in vivo and gene targeted delivery.