Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1986 May;29(5):852–857. doi: 10.1128/aac.29.5.852

In vitro activity of CI-934, a new quinolone, compared with that of other quinolones and other antimicrobial agents.

W Mandell, H C Neu
PMCID: PMC284166  PMID: 3729343

Abstract

The in vitro activity of CI-934, a new 4-quinolone, was determined against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. The MICs for 90% of the isolates tested were 0.25 microgram/ml for Streptococcus pneumoniae, 0.5 microgram/ml for Streptococcus faecalis, 0.25 microgram/ml for staphylococci, including methicillin-resistant strains, and less than or equal to 1.0 microgram/ml for Escherichia coli, Salmonella and Shigella spp., Klebsiella spp., Proteus spp., and Citrobacter spp. CI-934 had activity superior to that of other quinolones against streptococci by four- to eightfold. Against members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, ciprofloxacin was 2- to 18-fold more active; ofloxacin and norfloxacin were twofold more active or similar to CI-934. CI-934 inhibited ampicillin-cephalothin-resistant urinary isolates of E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Proteus mirabilis and cefoxatime-resistant Acinetobacter spp., Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter cloacae, Proteus vulgaris, and Morganella morganii. The medium, inoculum size, and oxygen concentration, as well as the addition of serum, had not major effect on the activity of CI-934. Magnesium at a concentration of 9 mM increased MICs and MBCs four- to eightfold, and testing at pH 6 increased MICs as much as 32- to 64-fold for some organisms in comparison with MICs at pH 7. The frequency of spontaneous mutation to resistance was comparable to that for other new quinolones, but resistant isolates could be selected by repeated subculture.

Full text

PDF
852

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barry A. L., Jones R. N. Cross-resistance among cinoxacin, ciprofloxacin, DJ-6783, enoxacin, nalidixic acid, norfloxacin, and oxolinic acid after in vitro selection of resistant populations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Jun;25(6):775–777. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.6.775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barry A. L., Jones R. N., Thornsberry C., Ayers L. W., Gerlach E. H., Sommers H. M. Antibacterial activities of ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, oxolinic acid, cinoxacin, and nalidixic acid. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 May;25(5):633–637. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.5.633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chin N. X., Neu H. C. Ciprofloxacin, a quinolone carboxylic acid compound active against aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Mar;25(3):319–326. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.3.319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chin N. X., Neu H. C. In vitro activity of enoxacin, a quinolone carboxylic acid, compared with those of norfloxacin, new beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, and trimethoprim. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Nov;24(5):754–763. doi: 10.1128/aac.24.5.754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cohen M. A., Griffin T. J., Bien P. A., Heifetz C. L., Domagala J. M. In vitro activity of CI-934, a quinolone carboxylic acid active against gram-positive and -negative bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Dec;28(6):766–772. doi: 10.1128/aac.28.6.766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Eliopoulos G. M., Gardella A., Moellering R. C., Jr In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin, a new carboxyquinoline antimicrobial agent. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Mar;25(3):331–335. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.3.331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gombert M. E., Aulicino T. M. Susceptibility of multiply antibiotic-resistant pneumococci to the new quinoline antibiotics, nalidixic acid, coumermycin, and novobiocin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Dec;26(6):933–934. doi: 10.1128/aac.26.6.933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hooper D. C., Wolfson J. S. The fluoroquinolones: pharmacology, clinical uses, and toxicities in humans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Nov;28(5):716–721. doi: 10.1128/aac.28.5.716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. King A., Shannon K., Phillips I. The in-vitro activities of enoxacin and ofloxacin compared with that of ciprofloxacin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1985 May;15(5):551–558. doi: 10.1093/jac/15.5.551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pearson R. D., Steigbigel R. T., Davis H. T., Chapman S. W. Method of reliable determination of minimal lethal antibiotic concentrations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Nov;18(5):699–708. doi: 10.1128/aac.18.5.699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Reeves D. S., Bywater M. J., Holt H. A., White L. O. In-vitro studies with ciprofloxacin, a new 4-quinolone compound. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Apr;13(4):333–346. doi: 10.1093/jac/13.4.333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sanders C. C., Sanders W. E., Jr, Goering R. V., Werner V. Selection of multiple antibiotic resistance by quinolones, beta-lactams, and aminoglycosides with special reference to cross-resistance between unrelated drug classes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Dec;26(6):797–801. doi: 10.1128/aac.26.6.797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sato K., Matsuura Y., Inoue M., Une T., Osada Y., Ogawa H., Mitsuhashi S. In vitro and in vivo activity of DL-8280, a new oxazine derivative. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Oct;22(4):548–553. doi: 10.1128/aac.22.4.548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Shah P. M., Ottrad M., Stille W. In vitro activity of norfloxacin in urine compared to that of cinnoxacin, nalidixic acid and pipemidic acid. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Jun;2(3):272–274. doi: 10.1007/BF02029533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Smith J. T. Mutational resistance to 4-quinolone antibacterial agents. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Aug;3(4):347–350. doi: 10.1007/BF01977492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tenney J. H., Maack R. W., Chippendale G. R. Rapid selection of organisms with increasing resistance on subinhibitory concentrations of norfloxacin in agar. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Jan;23(1):188–189. doi: 10.1128/aac.23.1.188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Traub W. H. Incomplete cross-resistance of nalidixic and pipemidic acid-resistant variants of Serratia marcescens against ciprofloxacin, enoxacin, and norfloxacin. Chemotherapy. 1985;31(1):34–39. doi: 10.1159/000238311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Van Caekenberghe D. L., Pattyn S. R. In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin compared with those of other new fluorinated piperazinyl-substituted quinoline derivatives. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Apr;25(4):518–521. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.4.518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wolfson J. S., Hooper D. C. The fluoroquinolones: structures, mechanisms of action and resistance, and spectra of activity in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Oct;28(4):581–586. doi: 10.1128/aac.28.4.581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES