Skip to main content
Deutsches Ärzteblatt International logoLink to Deutsches Ärzteblatt International
letter
. 2010 Mar 5;107(9):151. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0151a

Correspondence (letter to the editor): Preferring Blue Light-filtering Lenses

Siegfried Hünig *, Georg Hünig **
PMCID: PMC2841858  PMID: 20305772

The spectral permeability of intraocular lenses (IOL) determines the known “blue hazard” for the retina, which affects the development of age related macular degeneration (AMD). On the one hand, the blue hazard causes irreversible damage to the blue receptors. Further, the yellow lipofuscins that are deposited during the daily partial replacement of the outer segments of the photoreceptors on the retina tend to fluoresce in the blue light. This light energy activates the oxygen that is present, resulting in the formation of highly active, toxic radicals (reactive oxygen species, ROS). These can be warded off only to a degree.

The eye protects itself against UV damage because the lens absorbs UV light and may thus develop a cataract. The age related yellowing of the lens is akin to an increase in the blue protection and makes sense physiologically because with increasing age the risk of retinal damage increases owing to the imbalance of ROS lipofuscins and repair mechanisms.

The blue hazard that is caused by a colorless intraocular lens is clearly in excess of that of a 4 year old child (!) and, because it happens to a retina that is already weakened, it increases the risk of AMD. For the violet and blue spectrum, the blue-filtering intraocular lens imitates the permeability curve of the lens of a 50 year old. Although several questions remain unanswered (1), the blue-filtering lens should be preferred and colorless lenses used only for particular indications.

Further, the permeability curve of sunglasses is crucial for the risk associated with light and the progression of AMD (2, 3).

Footnotes

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that no conflict of interest exists according to the guidelines of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.

References

  • 1.Carson, et al. New approach to evaluate retinal protection by intraocular lenses against age-related lipofuscin accumulation-mediated retinal phototoxicity. J Catact Refract Surg. 2008;34:1785–1792. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.06.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hünig S. Optimierter Lichtschutz der Augen: eine dringende Aufgabe und ihre Lösung. Z prakt Augenheilkd. 2009;29:111–116. 197–205. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hünig S. Meine Sonnenbrille; beste Sicht durch dreifachen Schutz (informatory leaflet) 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kohnen T, Baumeister M, Kook D, Klaproth OK, Ohrloff C. Cataract surgery with implantation of an artificial lens. Dtsch Artzebl Int. 2009;106(43):695–702. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Deutsches Arzteblatt International are provided here courtesy of Deutscher Arzte-Verlag GmbH

RESOURCES