Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1991 Jun;35(6):1196–1202. doi: 10.1128/aac.35.6.1196

Comparison of spiral gradient and conventional agar dilution for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

H M Wexler 1, E Molitoris 1, F Jashnian 1, S M Finegold 1
PMCID: PMC284310  PMID: 1929262

Abstract

Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed on brucella laked blood agar with 340 isolates and 14 antimicrobial agents by the standard agar dilution technique and the spiral gradient technique in which antibiotic concentrations were established by diffusion from the agar surface. For comparison, spiral gradient MICs were determined by calculating antimicrobial concentrations at growth endpoints and rounding up to the next twofold incremental concentration. The cumulative percentage of strains susceptible at the breakpoint determined from spiral gradient data was within 10%, generally, of the percentage of strains susceptible at the breakpoint determined from agar dilution data. The overall agreement between the two techniques (within one doubling dilution) was 90.6%. The spiral gradient agar dilution technique is a reasonable alternative to the conventional agar dilution technique for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

Full text

PDF

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Donnelly C. B., Gilchrist J. E., Peeler J. T., Campbell J. E. Spiral plate count method for the examination of raw and pasteurized milk. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976 Jul;32(1):21–27. doi: 10.1128/aem.32.1.21-27.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Finegold S. M. Susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Jul;26(7):1253–1256. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.7.1253-1256.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hill G. B., Schalkowsky S. Development and evaluation of the spiral gradient endpoint method for susceptibility testing of anaerobic gram-negative bacilli. Rev Infect Dis. 1990 Jan-Feb;12 (Suppl 2):S200–S209. doi: 10.1093/clinids/12.supplement_2.s200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Johnson C. C., Wexler H. M., Becker S., Garcia M., Finegold S. M. Cell-wall-defective variants of Fusobacterium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Mar;33(3):369–372. doi: 10.1128/aac.33.3.369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wexler H. M., Finegold S. M. Antimicrobial resistance in Bacteroides. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1987 Feb;19(2):143–146. doi: 10.1093/jac/19.2.143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wexler H. M., Lavin P. T., Molitoris E., Finegold S. M. Statistical analysis of the effects of trial, reader, and replicates on MIC determination for cefoxitin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Nov;34(11):2246–2249. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.11.2246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES