Abstract
Metronidazole activity against 25 clinical isolates of Helicobacter pylori was evaluated by agar dilution, epsilometer (E-test; AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden), and disk diffusion methods after 3 and 5 days of incubation in a microaerophilic atmosphere. Agar dilution, performed in duplicate, provided reproducible results with MICs for 50% of the isolates of less than or equal to 0.12 microgram/ml after 3 and 5 days of incubation and MICs for 90% of the isolates of 2 and 4 micrograms/ml after 3 and 5 days of incubation, respectively. Reproducibility of MICs was slightly better after 5 days than after 3 days of incubation. MICs obtained with the E-test were higher, with 76 and 68% of isolates inhibited by less than or equal to 16 micrograms of metronidazole per ml after 3 and 5 days, respectively, in contrast with corresponding values of 92 and 88% for agar dilution. Zone diameters obtained with the commercially available 80-micrograms metronidazole elution disk were too large (greater than or equal to 41 mm) to allow discrimination between susceptible and resistant isolates, although resistant subpopulations were detected by the appearance of inner colonies in four isolates. In conclusion, the E-test was easy to perform and interpret, and it appeared to be more likely than agar dilution to detect metronidazole resistance in vitro in H. pylori.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Baker C. N., Stocker S. A., Culver D. H., Thornsberry C. Comparison of the E Test to agar dilution, broth microdilution, and agar diffusion susceptibility testing techniques by using a special challenge set of bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Mar;29(3):533–538. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.3.533-538.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bayerdörffer E., Ottenjann R. The role of antibiotics in Campylobacter pylori associated peptic ulcer disease. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1988;142:93–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown D. F., Brown L. Evaluation of the E test, a novel method of quantifying antimicrobial activity. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991 Feb;27(2):185–190. doi: 10.1093/jac/27.2.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haas C. E., Nix D. E., Schentag J. J. In vitro selection of resistant Helicobacter pylori. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Sep;34(9):1637–1641. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.9.1637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jorgensen J. H., Howell A. W., Maher L. A. Quantitative antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae by using the E-test. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Jan;29(1):109–114. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.1.109-114.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kasper G., Dickgiesser N. Antibiotic sensitivity of "Campylobacter pylori". Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Oct;3(5):444–444. doi: 10.1007/BF02017370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]