Abstract
Voltage-gated sodium channels are required for the initiation and propagation of action potentials. Mutations in the neuronal voltage-gated sodium channel SCN1A are associated with a growing number of disorders including generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+),7 severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy, and familial hemiplegic migraine. To gain insight into the effect of SCN1A mutations on neuronal excitability, we introduced the human GEFS+ mutation SCN1A-R1648H into the orthologous mouse gene. Scn1aRH/RH mice homozygous for the R1648H mutation exhibit spontaneous generalized seizures and premature death between P16 and P26, whereas Scn1aRH/+ heterozygous mice exhibit infrequent spontaneous generalized seizures, reduced threshold and accelerated propagation of febrile seizures, and decreased threshold to flurothyl-induced seizures. Inhibitory cortical interneurons from P5-P15 Scn1aRH/+ and Scn1aRH/RH mice demonstrated slower recovery from inactivation, greater use-dependent inactivation, and reduced action potential firing compared with wild-type cells. Excitatory cortical pyramidal neurons were mostly unaffected. These results suggest that this SCN1A mutation predominantly impairs sodium channel activity in interneurons, leading to decreased inhibition. Decreased inhibition may be a common mechanism underlying clinically distinct SCN1A-derived disorders.
Keywords: Diseases/Neurological, Genetic Diseases, Mouse Genetics, Neurobiology, Sodium Channels, GEFS+, SCN1A, Epilepsy, Ion Channel, Mouse Models
Introduction
Heterozygous mutations in the neuronal voltage-gated sodium channel gene SCN1A are responsible for several disorders including generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+),7 severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy (SMEI), and familial hemiplegic migraine (1–3). Mutations in SCN1A account for ∼80% of SMEI cases and 10% of GEFS+ cases. Over half of the more than 600 SCN1A mutations in SMEI patients result in protein truncation and loss of function, demonstrating haploinsufficiency of SCN1A (4, 5). In contrast, GEFS+ mutations are amino acid substitutions that presumably alter but do not abolish SCN1A activity.
The amino acid substitutions R1648H and T875M were the first identified SCN1A-GEFS+ mutations (1). The R1648H mutation was identified in a large pedigree with 13 affected members (1). The phenotypes of the R1648H/+ heterozygotes in this family were highly variable and included individuals with only childhood febrile seizures, only afebrile epilepsies such as generalized tonic clonic seizures (GTCS), absence seizures, and myoclonic seizures, and both febrile and afebrile seizures (1). This variation in severity may result from differences in genetic modifiers or environmental influences (4, 6).
GEFS+ families with SCN1A mutations have also been identified in which some affected members display neuropsychiatric deficits and ataxia (7, 8). The range of phenotypes among GEFS+ pedigrees that harbor different SCN1A mutations suggests that clinical variability may arise from differences in the way the mutations alter Nav1.1 function. However, functional analyses of GEFS+ mutations in heterologous systems have failed to reveal clear genotype-phenotype correlations, and different results have been observed when the same mutation was examined in different expression systems. For example, Nav1.1 channels with the R1648H mutation exhibited faster recovery from inactivation in Xenopus oocytes (9) but increased persistent current in HEK cells (10). Both of these effects should increase sodium channel activity. Other GEFS+ mutations (D1886Y and R859C) have been predicted to decrease neuronal excitability by slowing recovery from inactivation and shifting the voltage dependence of activation or inactivation (11–13).
To examine the in vivo effects of SCN1A mutations on neuronal function, we first generated transgenic mice that express a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clone containing the mouse Scn1a gene into which the R1648H mutation was introduced (14). Electrophysiological analysis of dissociated cortical neurons from the transgenic mice revealed decreased sodium channel function in GABAergic inhibitory interneurons. Recordings from cortical and hippocampal neurons from two Scn1a knock-out mouse models of SMEI (15, 16) revealed a similar specific effect of Scn1a deficiency in GABAergic interneurons, raising the prospect that impaired inhibitory circuits may be a common feature of disorders that result from SCN1A mutations.
To develop a more accurate model of the human disease, we have now introduced the SCN1A-R1648H mutation (1, 9) into the mouse genome by homologous recombination at the Scn1a locus. Spontaneous generalized seizures in heterozygous (Scn1aRH/+) and homozygous (Scn1aRH/RH) knock-in mutants as well as the predicted increased susceptibility to experimental febrile seizures were observed. Electrophysiological analysis of dissociated cortical neurons from the knock-in mutants demonstrated delayed recovery from inactivation, increased use dependent inactivation, and reduced action potential firing in inhibitory interneurons, which is predicted to reduce inhibition.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Preparation of the Targeting Construct
The targeting construct consisted of a 4.1-kb 5′ arm of homology, a neomycin cassette flanked by FLP1 recombinase (Frt) sites, and a 4-kb 3′ arm of homology containing the R1648H mutation and an additional silent substitution resulting in a unique EcoRI site. The final assembled targeting construct was sequenced.
Targeting of the R1648H Mutation to the Mouse Scn1a Gene
The targeting construct was linearized with AvrII, gel-purified, and electroporated into 129X1/SvJ-derived PAT-5 embryonic stem (ES) cells. Six hundred neomycin-resistant clones were selected and screened by PCR amplification for correct targeting of the 3′ arm using the primer pair F4RH (GGAAT AGGAA CTTCG TTCTG CTCG) and R4RH (GTGTG CAACT CTCCC TACCA TAAG). Positive clones were then screened for homologous recombination of the 5′ arm by PCR amplification using the primer pair F5RH (CAAGT GCTAC TTGCC CAGCA G) and R5RH (TTCTG AGGCG GAAAG AACCA G). The PCR reactions were conducted using PCR SuperMix High Fidelity (Invitrogen) under the recommended conditions.
Southern Blot Hybridization
ES cell clones that amplified with both PCR screens were next analyzed by Southern blot hybridization. Ten micrograms of genomic DNA were digested overnight with SpeI, StuI, or BglI and separated by agarose gel electrophoresis. Gels were soaked with agitation in 0.25 m HCl for 10 min, 0.5 m NaOH and 1.5 m NaCl for 20 min, and 1.5 m NaCl and 0.5 m Tris (pH 7.5) for 20 min and then transferred by capillary action to Hybond-XL membranes (Amersham Biosciences) with 10× SSC (1× SSC = 0.15 m NaCl and 0.015 m sodium citrate). Membranes were prehybridized at 65 °C for 2 h in 7% SDS, 0.25 m Na2HPO4 (pH 7.2), and 1 mm EDTA. External probes with homology to the region upstream of the 5′ arm and downstream of the 3′ arm were PCR-amplified with the primer pair 5′F (CAAGC AGAGC TGTTG GCTGA GGT) and 5′R (AGTGT GTAGT TGTAG GTCAT TTGGA GAC) and the pair 3′F (GGACT TCCTA GAATG GCCCC TCAG) and 3′R (CCAAG CGTAA CCATG CTGTA TTTC), respectively. An internal probe with homology to the 5′ arm was amplified using the primer pair 5′intF (CATTA GGAAG GTTTA GATCC ACTG) and 5′intR (CCTAC CTATT CAACC AACCA AAAT). Each probe was radiolabeled with [α-32P]CTP using the Megaprime DNA Labeling System (Amersham Biosciences), purified using MicroSpin G50 columns (Amersham Biosciences), and added to the prehybridization buffer for overnight incubation of the membrane. Membranes were washed twice with 2× SSC and 0.1% SDS, once with 1× SSC and 0.1% SDS, and once with 0.2× SSC and 0.1% SDS at 65 °C for 15 min. Clones identified as correctly targeted were confirmed to have normal karyotypes by chromosome analysis. Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA from tail biopsies of 5-week-old mice was performed as described for the ES cell clones.
Generation of Scn1aRH/+ and Scn1aRH/RH Mice
Two clones with the R1648H mutation were injected into blastocysts obtained from mating C57BL/6NCrl female mice with (C57BL/6J X DBA/2J)F1 male mice at the University of Michigan Transgenic Core. Male chimeras with a high percentage of agouti coat color were bred to Tg(ACTFLPe)9205Dym/J females expressing FLP1 recombinase to test for germ line transmission of the mutation and to delete the neomycin cassette. Scn1aRH/+;Tg(ACTFLPe)9205Dym transgene-positive male offspring were bred to C56BL/6J females to produce Scn1aRH/+ N1 males. N1 males lacking the FLPe transgene were crossed to C57BL/6J females to create the N2 generation. All experiments on heterozygous mice were conducted at the N2 generation. Scn1aRH/+ N2 males and females were crossed to obtain Scn1aRH/RH mice. Mice were maintained at 22 °C on a 12-h light/dark cycle. Food and water were available ad libitum. All experiments were performed in accordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of Emory University and the University of California, Irvine.
Genotyping of Mutants
To screen for the R1648H mutation, tail DNA was amplified using the Scn1a-specific primer pair FRH (TTGAT GACTT CTTCA CTGAT TGAT) and RRH (AGAGG CTCTG CACTT TCTTC). PCR amplification was performed for 32 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 45 s. The 591-bp PCR product was digested with EcoRI to distinguish between the wild-type (WT; 591 bp) and mutant (461 bp) alleles. The primers and the PCR conditions provided by The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) for the B6;SJL-Tg(ACTFLPe)9205Dym/J strain were used to genotype for the presence of the FLPe transgene. To screen for the deletion of the neomycin cassette, tail DNA was amplified with primers flanking the cassette, NeoF (TTTTC AAGTC AGGGT TCCTC), NeoR (GCAGG AAGGG ACATC ATCAG). PCR amplification was performed for 32 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 2.5 min. In the presence of the neomycin cassette, a 2.5-kb product was observed, whereas deletion of the neomycin cassette produced a 767-bp product from the targeted allele.
Northern Blot Analysis
Northern blot analysis was performed on mRNA from the whole brains of 5-week-old mice. Two micrograms of poly(A) RNA was separated by electrophoresis on an agarose gel containing 10% formaldehyde and 1× MOPS. RNA was capillary-transferred with 10× SSC to Hybond-XL membrane (Amersham Biosciences). Membranes were treated as previously described for Southern blot analysis. A published Scn1a probe (17) and the DECAtemplate glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase-mouse probe (Ambion) were radiolabeled, purified, and hybridized as in the Southern blot analysis.
Western Blot Analysis
Western blot analyses from P18 or 5-week-old mouse brains were performed as previously described (18). With each sodium channel antibody, two mice of each genotype were analyzed in duplicate on three separate gels, and protein levels were compared between mutants and wild-type littermates. Briefly, 30–100 μg of protein was separated on 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and blotted with anti-Nav1.1 (Chemicon, 1:200), anti-Nav1.2 (Alomone, 1:200), anti-Nav1.3 (Alomone, 1:200), or anti-Nav1.6 (Alomone, 1:200) antibodies. Horseradish peroxidase -conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (GE Healthcare) was diluted 1:5000. To correct for variation in protein loading, the membrane was also incubated with mouse anti-α-tubulin diluted 1:10,000 (Cedarlane Labs) followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch). Signal was visualized by chemiluminescent detection with the ECL detection system (GE Healthcare), and the intensity of each band was quantified using the Gel Logic 2200 Digital Imaging System (Eastman Kodak Co.) and normalized to the level of α-tubulin.
Kainic Acid Seizure Induction
Kainic acid seizure induction was conducted as previously described (6). Mice between three and six months of age were injected intraperitoneally with 15 or 20 mg/kg kainic acid (Ocean Produce International). Mice were observed for 2 h after the injection of kainic acid and scored according to a modified Racine scale (19).
Flurothyl Seizure Induction
Flurothyl seizure induction was performed as previously described (6). Mice (3–4 months old) were exposed to flurothyl(2,2,2-trifluroethylether) (Sigma) at a rate of 20 μl/min. The latencies to the first myoclonic jerk and to the GTCS were recorded. Progression of the tonic-clonic seizure to tonic hind-limb extension was also noted.
Valproic acid (VPA, Sigma) was dissolved in 0.9% saline and administered at 100, 200, or 300 mg/kg. VPA or saline was injected intraperitoneally 30 min before seizure induction. All experiments were carried out between 12 and 4 p.m. The experimenter was blind to the genotypes of the mice. Male and female data were analyzed separately. There were no observed sex differences in the data; therefore, data from both sexes were combined.
Experimental Febrile Seizure Induction and Analysis
The experimental febrile seizure paradigm was modified from methods published for the rat (20) and adapted to the mouse (21). Briefly, 14–15-day-old mice were exposed to hyperthermia (i.e. increased body and brain temperatures) via a warmed air stream. Core temperatures were measured before hyperthermia induction and at the onset of the seizures. The latter were considered threshold temperatures. In addition, the rate of seizure propagation was estimated by examining the progression of phenomenology of the seizure. The onset of experimental febrile seizures usually involves sudden immobility, reduced response to stimulation (altered consciousness), and facial automatisms. These rarely progress to generalized seizures. Because of altered seizure progression in the mutant mice, the latency and threshold temperature to generalized, tonic seizures were also determined. Once threshold and latency were determined, the hyperthermia was discontinued to stop the seizure. All experiments were carried out between 8 a.m. and 1 p.m., and the experimenter was blind to the genotypes.
Electroencephalography
Fourteen Scn1aRH/+ mice and nine WT littermates (3–5 months old) were implanted for electroencephalography (EEG) recordings as previously described (6). After a minimum of 7 days recovery from surgery, each mouse was placed into a Plexiglas box (15 × 15 × 15 cm) and attached to a series of bioelectric amplifiers (Embla Somnologica, Iceland) via a small counterbalanced commutator (Dragonfly Research). After 24 h of acclimatization, EEG and electromyography data were collected for 96 h from each mouse, and epileptiform activity was manually scored. Mouse behavior was also simultaneously monitored with digital video recording. Seizures were characterized by polyspike activity accompanied by stereotypic seizure behaviors and a refractory period. Interictal epileptiform activity was characterized by spike discharges that were at least two times the amplitude of the background.
Electrophysiological Recordings
Mice were decapitated after anesthesia with either ice (P5-P10) or halothane (P13-P15), and dissociated cortical neurons were prepared as described previously (22, 23). Excitatory pyramidal neurons and inhibitory bipolar neurons were identified by correlating shape with staining for anti-GluR1 (glutamate receptor 1) (1:5000, Upstate Biotechnology) and anti-GAD67 (glutamic acid decarboxylase 67) (1:5000, Chemicon), respectively (24, 25). Secondary antibodies Alexa Fluor 568-anti-rabbit IgG and Alexa Fluor 488-anti-mouse IgG2a (Molecular Probes) were used for observation with epifluorescent illumination.
Electrophysiological recordings were performed within 24–36 h of obtaining neuronal cultures at 22–25 °C in the whole-cell patch configuration using an Axopatch 200B patch clamp with Digidata 1322A interface and pCLAMP 8 software. The bath solution consisted of 150 mm NaCl, 3 mm KCl, 15 mm tetraethylammonium chloride, 4 mm BaCl2, 0.1 mm CdCl2, and 10 mm HEPES (pH 7.4), and the electrode solution consisted of 140 mm CsF, 10 mm NaCl, 5 mm EGTA, and 10 mm HEPES (pH 7.3). Series resistance was compensated to 80–90%, and linear leak subtraction was used for all recordings. Corrections were made for leak and capacity currents using P/4 subtraction. Currents were filtered at 5 kHz and sampled at 20 kHz.
Current densities were determined in neurons from P13-P15 mice at room temperature (22–25 °C) in voltage clamp mode during a 15-ms depolarization to −5 mV from a holding potential of −70 mV. Series resistance was less than 20 megaohms, and the current amplitudes were normalized to cellular capacitance. Statistical significance was determined using Student's t test.
The voltage dependence of activation and inactivation, recovery from inactivation, and use-dependent inactivation were studied using protocols described by Spampanato et al. (9). Briefly, the voltage dependence of activation was analyzed using a protocol with depolarizations from −60 to +15 mV in 5-mV intervals. Peak current amplitudes were converted to conductance values, normalized for comparison, and plotted against voltage. The voltage dependence of inactivation was analyzed using varying depolarizations for 50 ms to allow inactivation followed by repolarization and then depolarizing to a test potential of −15 mV to elicit the remaining available current. Peak currents during the test pulse were normalized for comparison and plotted against the voltage of the conditioning pulse. Recovery from inactivation was analyzed using a protocol that first inactivated the channels by depolarization to −5 mV for 50 ms followed by recovery at −80 mV for a variable period of time (2 to 60 ms) and a test pulse to −5 mV. Peak current amplitudes during the test pulse were normalized to peak current amplitudes during the conditioning pulse and plotted against recovery time. Use-dependent inactivation was examined by successive depolarizations to −5 mV from a holding potential of −80 mV at 10 and 39 Hz. Measurement of persistent current was done using prolonged 200-ms depolarizations to −10 mV. Each voltage step was followed by a >5-s recovery period at −80 mV to minimize the accumulation of use-dependent inactivation. Pulse generation, data collection, and analyses were done with pCLAMP 8.0, Excel, and SigmaPlot 9.0 software. Data shown are the means ± S.E., and statistical significance was determined using Student's t test.
The average values of the parameters of activation, inactivation, recovery from inactivation, and use-dependent inactivation shown in Tables 2 and 3 were obtained after fitting the data with the following equations. For activation, G = 1/(1 + exp(−0.03937z(V −V½)), in which G is conductance, z is the apparent gating charge, V is the potential of the given pulse, and V½ is the potential for half-maximal activation. For inactivation, I = 1/(1 + exp(V − V½)/a), in which I is equal to the test-pulse current amplitude, V is the potential of the conditioning pulse, V½ is the voltage for half-maximal inactivation, and a is the slope factor. For recovery: I = 1 − Aexp(−t/τ) − c, in which A is the fraction of current that recovered with the time constant τ, t is the recovery time, and c is the fraction of current that did not recover. For use-dependent inactivation: I = A1exp(−t/τ) + c (single exponential), in which A1 is the relative fraction of current that decayed with the time constant τ, t is the decay time, and c is the remaining current.
TABLE 2.
P5-P8 |
P13-P15 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RH/RH | RH/+ | WT | RH/RH | RH/+ | WT | |
Voltage dependence of activation | ||||||
Gating charge (z) | 3.4 ± 0.7 | 3.9 ± 0.8 | 3.5 ± 1.2 | 5.9 ± 0.9 | 3.8 ± 0.8 | 5.8 ± 2.1 |
V½ (mV) | −21.5 ± 5.1 | −20.9 ± 5.8 | −21.1 ± 6.2 | −31.9 ± 6.4 | −32.5 ± 4.3 | −30.3 ± 3.3 |
n | 5 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 8 |
Voltage dependence of inactivation | ||||||
Slope (a) | 7.9 ± 2.3 | 9.2 ± 1.7 | 10.1 ± 1.1 | 7.2 ± 1.3 | 9.3 ± 2.5 | 7.2 ± 1.2 |
V½ (mV) | −53.5 ± 7.3 | −58.9 ± 7.2 | −54.8 ± 6.9 | −58.4 ± 6.3 | −58.9 ± 7.3 | −58.9 ± 6.1 |
n | 5 | 12 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
Recovery from inactivation | ||||||
Ratio (a) | 0.9 ± 0.23 | 0.9 ± 0.16 | 1.1 ± 0.05 | 0.94 ± 0.12 | 0.99 ± 0.11 | 0.95 ± 0.07 |
τ1 (ms) | 9.5 ± 0.5a | 7.6 ± 0.4a | 5.1 ± 0.3 | 9.6 ± 0.2a | 10.4 ± 0.4a | 7.6 ± 0.1 |
Fraction recovered | 0.8 ± 0.04a | 0.9 ± 0.06 | 0.95 ± 0.02 | 0.9 ± 0.03a | 0.92 ± 0.04 | 0.94 ± 0.02 |
n | 4 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 6 |
Use dependence at 39 Hz | ||||||
Fraction decayed (A) | 0.5 ± 0.06 | 0.4 ± 0.04 | 0.4 ± 0.02 | 0.4 ± 0.08 | 0.3 ± 0.06 | 0.3 ± 0.03 |
τ1 (s) | 0.5 ± 0.03a | 0.6 ± 0.07 | 0.7 ± 0.04 | 0.6 ± 0.08 | 0.5 ± 0.07a | 0.8 ± 0.1 |
Remaining current (C) | 0.2 ± 0.06a | 0.4 ± 0.08 | 0.4 ± 0.09 | 0.38 ± 0.09 | 0.4 ± 0.08 | 0.5 ± 0.09 |
n | 6 | 19 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 9 |
Use dependence at 10 Hz | ||||||
Fraction decayed (A) | 0.1 ± 0.04 | 0.1 ± 0.04 | 0.1 ± 0.02 | 0.3 ± 0.06 | 0.3 ± 0.08 | 0.2 ± 0.09 |
τ1 (s) | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.08a | 0.5 ± 0.02 | 0.3 ± 0.07a | 0.4 ± 0.08a | 0.8 ± 0.09 |
Remaining current (C) | 0.8 ± 0.02a | 0.8 ± 0.09 | 0.9 ± 0.06 | 0.72 ± 0.09a | 0.76 ± 0.05 | 0.86 ± 0.06 |
n | 7 | 11 | 14 | 15 | 8 | 10 |
Persistent current | ||||||
Percent | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.3 |
n | 6 | 9 | 11 | 9 | 6 | 7 |
a Statistically significant difference compared to wild-type neurons (p < 0.05).
TABLE 3.
P5-P8 |
P13-P15 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RH/RH | RH/+ | WT | RH/RH | RH/+ | WT | |
Voltage dependence of activation | ||||||
Gating charge (z) | 5.0 ± 1.3 | 6.1 ± 1.2 | 4.4 ± 0.9 | 4.4 ± 0.9 | 4.9 ± 1.2 | 6.7 ± 0.8 |
V½ (mV) | −27.6 ± 5.6 | −26.7 ± 4.9 | −24.5 ± 5.3 | −30.9 ± 4.9 | −31.8 ± 3.7 | −32.2 ± 5.3 |
n | 6 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
Voltage dependence of inactivation | ||||||
Slope (a) | 9.0 ± 1.3 | 7.3 ± 2.7 | 8.1 ± 1.9 | 6.7 ± 1.5 | 7.0 ± 2.7 | 7.4 ± 1.9 |
V½ (mV) | −56.9 ± 7.3 | −56.6 ± 6.7 | −52.3 ± 7.2 | −58.8 ± 4.3 | −55.2 ± 6.3 | −55.5 ± 5.2 |
n | 9 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Recovery from inactivation | ||||||
Ratio (a) | 0.9 ± 0.04 | 1.0 ± 0.07 | 0.8 ± 0.06 | 0.98 ± 0.06 | 0.99 ± 0.07 | 0.97 ± 0.06 |
τ1 (ms) | 8.1 ± 0.11 | 9.4 ± 0.08 | 9.4 ± 0.06 | 6.9 ± 0.13a | 9.5 ± 0.07 | 9.3 ± 0.06 |
Fraction recovered | 0.9 ± 0.02 | 0.9 ± 0.03 | 0.9 ± 0.03 | 0.9 ± 0.06 | 0.9 ± 0.04 | 0.9 ± 0.05 |
n | 3 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 6 |
Use dependence at 39 Hz | ||||||
Fraction decayed (A) | 0.5 ± 0.01 | 0.4 ± 0.03 | 0.4 ± 0.05 | 0.3 ± 0.01 | 0.3 ± 0.04 | 0.4 ± 0.07 |
τ1 (s) | 0.6 ± 0.04 | 0.5 ± 0.07 | 0.5 ± 0.04 | 0.4 ± 0.07 | 0.5 ± 0.09 | 0.5 ± 0.02 |
Remaining current (C) | 0.3 ± 0.06 | 0.4 ± 0.09 | 0.4 ± 0.09 | 0.3 ± 0.08 | 0.3 ± 0.06 | 0.4 ± 0.06 |
n | 5 | 13 | 17 | 8 | 4 | 5 |
Use dependence at 10 Hz | ||||||
Fraction decayed (A) | 0.2 ± 0.01 | 0.2 ± 0.03 | 0.2 ± 0.04 | 0.2 ± 0.004 | 0.2 ± 0.07 | 0.25 ± 0.03 |
τ1 (s) | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.05 | 0.3 ± 0.08 | 0.3 ± 0.03 | 0.3 ± 0.06 | 0.3 ± 0.02 |
Remaining current (C) | 0.8 ± 0.08 | 0.8 ± 0.08 | 0.8 ± 0.09 | 0.83 ± 0.06 | 0.85 ± 0.02 | 0.81 ± 0.04 |
n | 7 | 17 | 19 | 12 | 3 | 7 |
Persistent current | ||||||
Percent | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.3 |
n | 7 | 7 | 19 | 10 | 4 | 6 |
a Statistically significant difference compared to wild-type neurons (p < 0.05).
Current-clamp recordings were performed on dissociated cortical neurons from P8-P10 mice within 48 h of culture. Neurons were visualized using infrared differential interference contrast optics and selected based on shape. Recordings were performed at room temperature (22–25 °C) using a Multiclamp 700A patch clamp amplifier and pClamp 10.2 software (Molecular Devices). Signals were sampled at 25 kHz and filtered at 10 kHz. The pipette solution contained 126 mm potassium gluconate, 4 mm KCl, 10 mm HEPES, 4 mm Mg-ATP, 0.3 mm Tris-GTP, 10 mm phosphocreatine, pH 7.2. The bath solution contained 126 mm NaCl, 1.25 mm NaH2PO4, 2.5 mm KCl, 2 mm CaCl2, 2 mm MgCl2, 26 mm NaHCO3, and 10 mm glucose, pH 7.3. After forming a seal and performing capacitance and series resistance compensations, the passive properties of the cells were recorded in voltage clamp mode. Before switching to current-clamp mode, the resting membrane potential was measured, and only neurons with resting potentials between −55 and −70 mV were used. Firing patterns were recorded in response to 2-s depolarizing current injections in 20-pA increments starting at 10 pA. Hyperpolarizing current in steps of 5-pA decrements was injected to measure the input resistance, and neurons with input resistance of 60–80 megaohms were selected for analysis. The number of action potentials in 2 s was counted, and only over-shooting action potentials more positive than 0 mV were included. Data are represented as the means ± S.E. Statistical significance was determined using Student's t test with p < 0.05 as the criterion for significance.
RESULTS
Targeted Insertion of the R1648H Mutation into the Mouse Scn1a Gene
We generated a mouse model of human GEFS+ by knocking in the SCN1A-R1648H mutation into exon 26 of the mouse Scn1a gene (Fig. 1A). This mutation resulted in the substitution of a positively charged arginine residue in the voltage sensor of domain 4 with a histidine residue (1). Six hundred neomycin-resistant ES cell clones were screened for correct targeting by PCR amplification of the 3′ and 5′ regions of homology (Fig. 1B). Clones that were positive in both PCR assays were examined by Southern blot analysis. Two correctly targeted ES cell clones were injected into blastocysts to generate chimeric mice that were bred to generate the knock-in mice. The presence of the targeted allele in the resulting lines of mice was confirmed by Southern blot analysis with 5′ and 3′ probes (Fig. 1C).
Northern blot analysis of mRNA from the whole brains of Scn1aRH/+ mice detected the expected full-length Scn1a transcript. The expression level of the Scn1a transcript was comparable in heterozygous Scn1aRH/+ mutants and WT littermates (Fig. 2A). Western blot analysis of protein extracts from the whole brains of P18 Scn1aRH/+ and Scn1aRH/RH mutants (Fig. 2B) and 5-week-old Scn1aRH/+ mutants (Fig. 2C) revealed levels of Nav1.1, Nav1.2, Nav1.3, and Nav1.6 that were comparable with WT littermates. Only full-length Nav1.1 protein was detected in the mutants (supplemental Fig. 1). These data demonstrate the in vivo stability of the R1648H transcript and the mutant channel protein.
Homozygous Scn1aRH/RH Mutants Exhibit Spontaneous Seizures and Shortened Life Span
Scn1aRH/RH mutants were visually indistinguishable from Scn1aRH/+ mice and WT littermates until approximately P16. Beginning at P16, recurrent visible seizures were observed in Scn1aRH/RH mice. The behavioral seizures typically lasted 30–90 s and were characterized by excessive jumping, repetitive jerking of all four limbs, head nodding, and clonus of the forelimbs and tail. Some behavioral seizures ended with hindlimb extension, typical of severe seizures in the mouse. The life span of the Scn1aRH/RH mutants was 16–26 days, with a mean life span of 18.5 days (Fig. 3A). The phenotype of Scn1aRH/RH homozygotes is very similar to homozygous null mice (15, 16), indicating that the R1648H mutation has a more profound effect in vivo than suggested by earlier studies in heterologous expression systems.
Before seizure onset, Scn1aRH/RH mutants gained weight at a rate similar to Scn1aRH/+ and WT littermates. From approximately P15, body weight began to decrease, and by P18 the average weight of Scn1aRH/RH mice was 23% lower than their littermates (p = 1.0 × 10−7) (Fig. 3B). Feeding behavior appeared to be normal, and excessive separation from the dam was rarely observed.
Nissl staining of brain sections from P18 homozygous and five-month-old heterozygous mutants revealed normal brain morphology and no gross reduction in cell density in the hippocampus or cortex compared with WT littermates. Neuronal cell abundance was investigated using the neuron-specific marker NeuN. Neither Scn1aRH/+ nor the Scn1aRH/RH mutants displayed a loss of NeuN immunoreactivity, demonstrating normal neuronal cell viability (data not shown).
Heterozygous Scn1aRH/+ Mutants Exhibit a Low Level of Spontaneous Seizures
EEG recordings were obtained for a period of 96 h from each of 14 freely moving 3–5-month-old Scn1aRH/+ mutants (1344 h total) and 9 age-matched WT littermates (864 h total). Generalized seizures were detected in two Scn1aRH/+ mutants. In these mice a total of 21 spontaneous generalized seizures were recorded during the combined 192 h of EEG analysis. Representative recordings are shown for a wild-type control (Fig. 4A) and a heterozygous mutant (Fig. 4, B and C). The seizures in the Scn1aRH/+ mutants involved both hemispheres of the brain and were characterized by spike discharges that were at least two times the amplitude of the background (Fig. 4C). The average duration of the seizures was 32.9 ± 1.8 s. All seizures were associated with stereotypic motor behaviors and were followed by a refractory period with an average length of 62.4 ± 12.7 s. Spontaneous seizures have also been observed in additional Scn1aRH/+ mutants during routine mouse colony management procedures. Seizures and spike discharges were not observed in the EEG recordings from the WT mice. The observation of spontaneous seizures in only two Scn1aRH/+ mutants is likely due, in part, to the mixed genetic background and is consistent with the variability observed among affected members of GEFS+ families. A variable incidence of spontaneous seizures was also observed in Scn1a+/− mice, with seizures detected in 3 of 7 mutants examined (15).
Scn1aRH/+ Mice Exhibit Reduced Thresholds to Flurothyl-induced and Experimental Febrile Seizures
To determine whether heterozygosity for the R1648H mutation alters seizure thresholds, we first examined the response to the chemiconvulsant flurothyl. We measured the latency to the myoclonic jerk, the first observable behavioral response, and latency to the GTCS (Fig. 5A). We observed no difference in the latency to the myoclonic jerk in Scn1aRH/+ mutants. However, Scn1aRH/+ mice exhibited a 19% reduction (p = 0.02) in the latency to the GTCS compared with WT littermates, indicating that GEFS+ mice are more susceptible to flurothyl-induced generalized seizures.
VPA is a broad-spectrum anticonvulsant used in the treatment of GEFS+ patients. We assessed the ability of VPA to correct the increased susceptibility to flurothyl-induced seizures observed in the mutant mice. Serum levels of VPA corresponding to therapeutic levels in humans can be achieved in mice by acute administration of 200 mg/kg VPA (26). Single doses of 100, 200, or 300 mg/kg of VPA or saline control were administered to Scn1aRH/+ mutants and WT littermates. Thirty minutes after administration of VPA, latency to flurothyl-induced GTCS was measured (Fig. 5B). Injection of 200 or 300 mg/kg of VPA returned the latency of Scn1aRH/+ mutants back to WT values (Fig. 5B). The values for latency to GTCS after 200 mg/kg VPA were 9.7 ± 1.2 min in WT mice and 9.2 ± 1.8 min in heterozygous mutants (p = 0.53). After 300 mg/kg VPA, the latency was 14.2 ± 3.7 min in WT and 13.1 ± 3.5 min in the mutants (p = 0.53).
The seizure thresholds of the Scn1aRH/+ mice were also examined after the administration of kainic acid at doses of 15 and 20 mg/kg. Seizure progression was determined using a modified Racine scale (19). The response of the heterozygous mutants was not statistically different from their WT littermates at either dose, indicating that the mutation does not increase susceptibility to all forms of seizure induction.
Because febrile seizures are a prominent symptom in patients with the R1648H mutation, we tested whether the knock-in mice also demonstrated increased susceptibility to febrile seizures. This was accomplished by comparing threshold temperatures and the latency to the onset and tonic generalization of these seizures in WT, Scn1aRH/+, and Scn1aRH/RH mice. Threshold temperatures for the onset of tonic febrile seizures in Scn1aRH/+ and Scn1aRH/RH mutants were significantly lower than those in WT littermates (Fig. 5C, one way analysis of variance, p = 0.0007). In addition, the latency to the tonic seizure onset was shorter in Scn1aRH/+ and Scn1aRH/RH mutants (Fig. 5D, one way analysis of variance, p = 0.01).
GABAergic Interneurons Exhibit Slowed Recovery from Inactivation and Elevated Use-dependent Inactivation in Scn1aRH/+ and Scn1aRH/RH Mice
To determine the mechanism by which the R1648H mutation altered neuronal excitability, we examined the electrophysiological properties of dissociated cortical neurons using whole-cell voltage clamp. Neurons were separated into the two major classes of cortical neurons: excitatory pyramidal-shaped neurons and inhibitory bipolar-shaped interneurons. Excitatory pyramidal neurons and GABAergic interneurons were first identified by antibody staining to glutamate receptor 1 (anti-GluR1) and glutamic acid decarboxylase 1 (anti-GAD67), as previously described (14). We then correlated immunostaining with cell morphology to identify bipolar-shaped GABAergic interneurons and pyramidal-shaped excitatory neurons for patch clamping. We examined cortical neurons because of the development of spontaneous generalized seizures in the mutant mice. Representative current traces recorded from bipolar and pyramidal cortical neurons from Scn1aRH/+, Scn1aRH/RH, and WT littermates at P13-P15 are shown in Fig. 6.
Because it was previously observed that the loss of one sodium channel allele in a mouse model of SMEI leads to a 40% reduction in sodium current in bipolar neurons (15), it was possible that the R1648H GEFS+ mutation could also lead to decreased levels of sodium current. Therefore, we first determined the total sodium current in bipolar neurons and pyramidal neurons from Scn1aRH/+, Scn1aRH/RH, and WT littermates at P13-P15. To account for differences in cell sizes, the total current was normalized to the cellular capacitance, which is directly proportional to the total quantity of cell membrane. Bipolar neurons from WT mice demonstrated a higher current density than pyramidal neurons, with a ratio of 2.70 (Table 1). The higher density in bipolar neurons is consistent with previous results from an SMEI mouse model (15) and from wild-type mice in which the dendritic sodium current density in interneurons was approximately three times higher than the density in principal neurons (27). In contrast, bipolar neurons from Scn1aRH/+ and Scn1aRH/RH demonstrated a current density than was similar to that of pyramidal neurons, with ratios of 0.94 and 0.95, respectively. There is a trend toward increased current density in pyramidal neurons from Scn1aRH/+ and Scn1aRH/RH compared with WT mice, although these differences were not statistically significant. These results indicate that the R1648H mutation specifically decreased the total sodium current amplitude in bipolar neurons.
TABLE 1.
Genotype | RH/RH | RH/+ | WT |
---|---|---|---|
Bipolar density (pA/pF) | −83 ± 10a | −60 ± 4a | −146 ± 29 |
Bipolar number of cells | 12 | 8 | 9 |
Pyramidal density (pA/pF) | −87 ± 14 | −64 ± 10 | −54 ± 9a |
Pyramidal number of cells | 10 | 7 | 7 |
Current ratio (bipolar/pyramidal) | 0.95 | 0.94 | 2.70 |
a Statistically significant difference compared to wild-type bipolar neurons (p < 0.05).
In addition to the effect on sodium current amplitudes, it was possible that the R1648H mutation might also alter the functional properties of the channel. Previous studies using heterologous systems have reported effects on activation, inactivation, use-dependent inactivation, and percentage of persistent current for this mutation (9, 10, 28). We examined all of these properties in bipolar and pyramidal neurons from Scn1aRH/+, Scn1aRH/RH, and WT littermates. Neurons were isolated at P13-P15, the oldest age before the Scn1aRH/RH mutants started to die, and at P5-P8, before the onset of seizures when Nav1.1 channels begin to be expressed (16).
In cortical bipolar neurons from P13-P15 mutant mice, there were no significant differences in the voltage dependence of sodium channel activation or inactivation compared with bipolar neurons from WT mice (Figs. 7, A and B, Table 2). The most significant difference was increased use-dependent inactivation with rapid stimulation. Use-dependent inactivation refers to the reduction in sodium current that is observed during successive depolarizations when there is insufficient time between depolarizations for the channels to fully recover from inactivation. With repetitive depolarizations at 39 Hz, neurons from Scn1aRH/+ and Scn1aRH/RH mice demonstrated a greater decrease in current compared with WT mice (Fig. 7C, Table 2). A less pronounced effect was observed with repetitive depolarizations at 10 Hz, a frequency at which there is only minimal use-dependent inactivation (Fig. 7D, Table 2). Consistent with this result, R1648H neurons also demonstrated slower recovery from inactivation (Fig. 7E). The time constant for recovery was significantly larger and the extent of recovery was significantly reduced in neurons from homozygous and heterozygous mice (Table 2). Neurons from the mutant mice demonstrated slightly less persistent current, but this difference was not statistically significant (Fig. 7F). Similar effects of the R1648H mutation were observed in bipolar neurons from P5-P8 mice (Table 2).
Anti-mGluR1-positive pyramidal-shaped neurons from Scn1aRH/+ and Scn1aRH/RH mice showed no significant differences in most of the functional properties examined. Specifically, there were no significant differences in the voltage dependence of activation and inactivation, use-dependent inactivation, or the percentage of persistent current in neurons from either P13-P15 or P5-P8 mice (Table 3). The only significant difference was that the time constant for recovery from inactivation was faster for Scn1aRH/RH compared with WT P13-P15 mice. However, the relevance of this effect is unclear, as no significant differences were observed in use-dependent inactivation at either age, and the difference in recovery time constants was not observed for pyramidal neurons from P5-P8 mice.
GABAergic Interneurons from Scn1aRH/RH Mice Exhibit Decreased Action Potential Firing
To determine whether the electrophysiological differences in sodium channel properties altered neuronal excitability, we measured the number of action potentials in response to 2-s injections of current in 20-pA increments starting at 10 pA. Sample traces of bipolar and pyramidal neurons during current injections from 10 to 110 pA are shown in Fig. 8A, and summary data showing the number of action potentials fired during the 2-s interval are shown in Fig. 8B. On average, bipolar neurons from WT and heterozygous Scn1aRH/+ mice fired comparable numbers of action potentials for all magnitudes of current, reaching a maximum of ∼35 action potentials and then tapering off at the highest levels of current (Fig. 8B), although some cells from Scn1aRH/+ mice showed reduced firing (Fig. 8A). In contrast, bipolar neurons from homozygous Scn1aRH/RH mice reached a maximum of only 20 action potentials when 70 pA was injected, and the number decreased with successively higher current injections.
Pyramidal neurons from all three genotypes fired fewer action potentials, with neurons from WT and heterozygous Scn1aRH/+ mice reaching a maximum of ∼20 action potentials before decreasing. Pyramidal neurons from homozygous Scn1aRH/RH mice showed reduced numbers of action potentials at the lowest current injections, with brief bursts at the beginning of the injection (Fig. 8A). However, the number of action potentials was comparable with those for neurons from WT and heterozygous Scn1aRH/+ mice for current injections above 90 pA, so that it is unclear if the difference at lower levels of current is physiologically significant. In contrast, the markedly reduced action potential firing in bipolar neurons from Scn1aRH/RH mice compared with WT and Scn1aRH/+ mice indicates that these neurons have reduced excitability, consistent with decreased sodium channel activity.
DISCUSSION
Several characteristics of the R1648H knock-in mice are similar to the clinical features of the human GEFS+ patients, who are heterozygous for the mutation. Heterozygous Scn1aRH/+ mice have normal life spans, reduced thresholds to febrile seizures, and spontaneous seizures. Homozygous Scn1aRH/RH mutant mice developed spontaneous seizures and weight loss starting at P15, the time when Scn1a expression approaches adult levels (16). Generalized seizures were frequently observed in the homozygous mutants, and these mice had an average life span of 18.5 days. Because severe convulsive seizures may impair the autonomic nervous system and lead to cardiac arrest (29), premature lethality in these mice may be due to severe motor seizures. Consistent with the severe phenotype of homozygous mice, there are no known patients with two mutant SCN1A alleles. In addition, Scn1aRH/RH mutants also display jumping, erratic behavior, and tail clonus in response to mild startle. This hyper-responsive behavior, which may reflect seizure activity, was not seen in Scn1aRH/+ mice or WT littermates.
Although the presence of the R1648H mutation did not affect Scn1a transcript or protein levels, it had a significant effect on the electrophysiological properties of cortical interneurons. Increased use-dependent inactivation and slowed recovery from inactivation were observed in bipolar interneurons but not in pyramidal cells, and there was a decreased ratio of sodium current in bipolar to pyramidal neurons. The decreased sodium current is particularly noteworthy for two reasons. First, the recordings measured total somatic currents, including contributions from the Nav1.2 and Nav1.6 isoforms, whereas the R1648H mutation should only affect Nav1.1. Second, bipolar and pyramidal neurons each represent a heterogeneous group of many different types of neurons, and it is likely that Nav1.1 is differentially expressed in many of those cell types. This heterogeneity is reflected in the large standard errors for the current density measurements in Table 1. We anticipate that the effects of the R1648H mutation will be more pronounced if examined in a homogenous population of inhibitory neurons.
The findings from the electrophysiological analysis of the sodium channel properties in the knock-in mice are consistent with our previous analysis of cortical interneurons from BAC transgenic mice expressing the SCN1A-R1648H mutation (14). However, we were only able to observe the effects of the mutation in the BAC transgenic mice when the mutant sodium currents were isolated by recording in the presence of saxitoxin. The fact that the mutation had comparable effects in homozygous knock-in mice demonstrates that the alterations were not due to use-dependent block by saxitoxin during recording from the BAC transgenic mice. In addition, we also observed that bipolar neurons from Scn1aRH/RH homozygous knock-in mice exhibit decreased action potential firing compared with neurons from WT or Scn1aRH/+ heterozygous mice. The fact that decreased firing was observed only in bipolar and not pyramidal neurons most likely reflects greater expression of the Nav1.1 channel in bipolar compared with pyramidal neurons, as we previously observed in the BAC transgenic mice (14) and others observed in the Scn1a knock-out mouse models of SMEI (15, 16).
Based on these effects, interneurons containing R1648H mutant sodium channels would be less reliable in propagating high frequency trains of action potentials, leading to a reduction in GABAergic inhibition. Given the importance of inhibitory circuits in controlling the excitability of postsynaptic neurons, it seems likely that reduced firing of cortical interneurons and possibly other GABAergic interneurons contributes to the seizure generation in the Scn1aR1648H mouse models. Reduced inhibition is also consistent with the rapid, abnormal propagation of experimental febrile seizures in these mice. Most Scn1aRH/RH mutant mice became immobile (the typical onset of experimental febrile seizure), then immediately progressed to a tonic seizure, whereas this progression was rarely seen in WT or Scn1aRH/+ mice, and when evident took several minutes to occur.
In contrast to the consistent results that were observed from the analysis of cortical interneurons from the R1648H knock-in and BAC transgenic mice, differences between the models were identified from the analysis of cortical pyramidal cells. The only electrophysiological abnormalities detected in cortical pyramidal cells from the knock-in mice was slightly faster recovery from inactivation in homozygous P13-P15 mutants and a lower number of action potentials at low current injections. However, the difference in recovery was small enough so that it did not result in an increase in use-dependent inactivation, and the number of action potentials at higher levels of current was comparable with that for WT mice. In contrast, cortical pyramidal cells from the BAC transgenic mice revealed a hyperpolarizing shift in the voltage dependence of inactivation (14). The two models also differed in seizure severity and susceptibility. The knock-in mice exhibited spontaneous seizures, EEG abnormalities and normal thresholds to kainic acid-induced seizures. In contrast, BAC transgenic mice were more susceptible to kainic acid-induced seizures but did not show spontaneous seizure activity. Differences between the two models were not surprising as the BAC transgene is unlikely to fully recapitulate the temporal and spatial expression of the endogenous Scn1a gene, and the knock-in mice represent a more accurate disease model.
Functional studies in heterologous expression systems have failed to identify a common abnormality in SCN1A mutations from patients with GEFS+. In different experimental systems, biophysical analysis of the R1648H mutation in Nav1.1 demonstrated either increased recovery from fast inactivation (9) or increased persistent current (10). Analysis of the comparable mutation in Nav1.2 demonstrated a positive shift in the voltage dependence of inactivation (30), and analysis in Nav1.4 identified a negative shift in the voltage dependence of activation and inactivation and increased recovery from fast inactivation (28). Analyses of other GEFS+ mutations in heterologous expression systems have also been difficult to interpret, with the biophysical abnormalities of some mutations being consistent with increased neuronal excitability (9, 11, 31, 32) and others predicting decreased neuronal excitability (9, 12, 13). It was not known from studies in heterologous systems whether the mutations primarily affect excitatory or inhibitory neurons. Results from our analysis of the biophysical properties of the R1648H mutation in neurons from the knock-in mice suggest that the primary effect of this mutation is to delay recovery from inactivation and, thus, decrease the firing of inhibitory neurons. Impairment of inhibition could be a general effect of SCN1A mutations, but analyses of mouse models with other Scn1a mutations are needed to determine whether this is a consistent mechanism.
Studies of two complete loss-of-function mutations of Scn1a in mouse models of SMEI also showed diminished GABAergic interneuron function. Heterozygotes for a knock-out mutation of Scn1a displayed reduced Nav1.1 channel expression, reduced sodium currents, and an inability to sustain repetitive firing in GABAergic interneurons of the cortex and hippocampus (15, 16). It is interesting that the R1648H homozygotes exhibit a time course of seizure initiation and progression to lethality that is very similar to the homozygous null mice, demonstrating a profound reduction of in vivo function as a result of this mutation. This was unexpected given the relatively small effects observed in heterologous systems. We propose that decreased excitability of the inhibitory circuitry is a major factor contributing to seizure generation in mouse models of GEFS+ and SMEI and, by extension, GEFS+ and SMEI patients. A similar mechanism may also underlie other SCN1A-derived disorders.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. David Gordon from the University of Colorado for providing the pLoxP-2FRT-PGKneo plasmid. We acknowledge Dr. David Weinshenker and Dr. Kroshona Tabb for help initiating the seizure induction experiments and Cheryl Strauss for editorial assistance. We thank Dr. Allan Levey, Dr. David Rye, and Dr. Glenda Keating for facilitating the experiments conducted in the Woodruff Memorial Research Building, Emory University.
This work was supported, in whole or in part, by National Institutes of Health Grants NS046484 and NS051834 (to A. E.), NS48336 (to A. L. G.), NS34509 (to M. H. M.), and NS35437 (to T. Z. B.). This work was also supported by McKnight Foundation Grant 34653 (to A. L. G.). The mouse model of GEFS+ described in this article has been licensed to Allergan. The terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by Emory University in accordance with its conflict of interest policy.
The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Fig. S1.
- GEFS+
- generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus
- SMEI
- severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy
- GTCS
- generalized tonic clonic seizures
- BAC
- bacterial artificial chromosome
- ES cell
- embryonic stem cell
- EEG
- electroencephalography
- WT
- wild type
- VPA
- valproic acid
- MOPS
- 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid
- GABAergic
- γ-aminobutyric acid-ergic.
REFERENCES
- 1.Escayg A., MacDonald B. T., Meisler M. H., Baulac S., Huberfeld G., An-Gourfinkel I., Brice A., LeGuern E., Moulard B., Chaigne D., Buresi C., Malafosse A. (2000) Nat. Genet. 24, 343–345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Claes L., Del-Favero J., Ceulemans B., Lagae L., Van Broeckhoven C., De Jonghe P. (2001) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 68, 1327–1332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Vanmolkot K. R. J., Babini E., de Vries B., Stam A. H., Freilinger T., Terwindt G. M., Norris L., Haan J., Frants R. R., Ramadan N. M., Ferrari M. D., Pusch M., van den Maagdenberg A. M. J. M., Dichgans M. (2007) Hum. Mutat. 28, 522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Meisler M. H., Kearney J. A. (2005) J. Clin. Invest. 115, 2010–2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Catterall W. A., Dib-Hajj S., Meisler M. H., Pietrobon D. (2008) J. Neurosci. 28, 11768–11777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Martin M. S., Tang B., Papale L. A., Yu F. H., Catterall W. A., Escayg A. (2007) Hum. Mol. Genet. 16, 2892–2899 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Osaka H., Ogiwara I., Mazaki E., Okamura N., Yamashita S., Iai M., Yamada M., Kurosawa K., Iwamoto H., Yasui-Furukori N., Kaneko S., Fujiwara T., Inoue Y., Yamakawa K. (2007) Epilepsy Res. 75, 46–51 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mahoney K., Moore S. J., Buckley D., Alam M., Parfrey P., Penney S., Merner N., Hodgkinson K., Young T. L. (2009) Seizure 18, 492–497 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Spampanato J., Escayg A., Meisler M. H., Goldin A. L. (2001) J. Neurosci. 21, 7481–7490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lossin C., Wang D. W., Rhodes T. H., Vanoye C. G., George A. L., Jr. (2002) Neuron 34, 877–884 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Spampanato J., Kearney J. A., de Haan G., McEwen D. P., Escayg A., Aradi I., MacDonald B. T., Levin S. I., Soltesz I., Benna P., Montalenti E., Isom L. L., Goldin A. L., Meisler M. H. (2004) J. Neurosci. 24, 10022–10034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Barela A. J., Waddy S. P., Lickfett J. G., Hunter J., Anido A., Helmers S. L., Goldin A. L., Escayg A. (2006) J. Neurosci. 26, 2714–2723 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lossin C., Rhodes T. H., Desai R. R., Vanoye C. G., Wang D., Carniciu S., Devinsky O., George A. L., Jr. (2003) J. Neurosci. 23, 11289–11295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tang B., Dutt K., Papale L., Rusconi R., Shankar A., Hunter J., Tufik S., Yu F. H., Catterall W. A., Mantegazza M., Goldin A. L., Escayg A. (2009) Neurobiol. Dis. 35, 91–102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yu F. H., Mantegazza M., Westenbroek R. E., Robbins C. A., Kalume F., Burton K. A., Spain W. J., McKnight G. S., Scheuer T., Catterall W. A. (2006) Nat. Neurosci. 9, 1142–1149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ogiwara I., Miyamoto H., Morita N., Atapour N., Mazaki E., Inoue I., Takeuchi T., Itohara S., Yanagawa Y., Obata K., Furuichi T., Hensch T. K., Yamakawa K. (2007) J. Neurosci. 27, 5903–5914 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kearney J. A., Buchner D. A., De Haan G., Adamska M., Levin S. I., Furay A. R., Albin R. L., Jones J. M., Montal M., Stevens M. J., Sprunger L. K., Meisler M. H. (2002) Hum. Mol. Genet. 11, 2765–2775 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chen C., Westenbroek R. E., Xu X., Edwards C. A., Sorenson D. R., Chen Y., McEwen D. P., O'Malley H. A., Bharucha V., Meadows L. S., Knudsen G. A., Vilaythong A., Noebels J. L., Saunders T. L., Scheuer T., Shrager P., Catterall W. A., Isom L. L. (2004) J. Neurosci. 24, 4030–4042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Racine R. J. (1972) Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 32, 281–294 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dube C., Chen K., Eghbal-Ahmadi M., Brunson K., Soltesz I., Baram T. Z. (2000) Ann. Neurol. 47, 336–344 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dubé C., Vezzani A., Behrens M., Bartfai T., Baram T. Z. (2005) Ann. Neurol. 57, 152–155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hilgenberg L. G., Hoover C. L., Smith M. A. (1999) J. Neurosci. 19, 7384–7393 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Li Z., Hilgenberg L. G., O'Dowd D. K., Smith M. A. (1999) J. Neurobiol. 39, 547–557 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fong A. Y., Stornetta R. L., Foley C. M., Potts J. T. (2005) J. Comp. Neurol. 493, 274–290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Graf E. R., Zhang X., Jin S. X., Linhoff M. W., Craig A. M. (2004) Cell 119, 1013–1026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Schank J. R., Liles L. C., Weinshenker D. (2005) Epilepsy Res. 65, 23–31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Martina M., Vida I., Jonas P. (2000) Science 287, 295–300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Alekov A., Rahman M. M., Mitrovic N., Lehmann-Horn F., Lerche H. (2000) J. Physiol. 529, 533–539 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Naritoku D. K., Casebeer D. J., Darbin O. (2003) Epilepsia 44, 912–916 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kühn F. J., Greeff N. G. (1999) J. Gen. Physiol. 114, 167–183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Spampanato J., Escayg A., Meisler M. H., Goldin A. L. (2003) Neuroscience 116, 37–48 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Spampanato J., Aradi I., Soltesz I., Goldin A. L. (2004) J. Neurophysiol. 91, 2040–2050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.