Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1994 Feb;38(2):234–237. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.2.234

Comparative in vivo activities of rifabutin and rifapentine against Mycobacterium avium complex.

S P Klemens 1, M A Grossi 1, M H Cynamon 1
PMCID: PMC284432  PMID: 8192449

Abstract

The dose-response activity of rifabutin and the comparative activities of rifabutin and rifapentine were evaluated in the beige mouse model of disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infection. In the dose-response study, mice were infected intravenously with approximately 10(7) viable M. avium ATCC 49601. Treatment with rifabutin at 10, 20, or 40 mg/kg of body weight was started 7 days postinfection and was administered daily for 10 days. The mice were sacrificed 3 to 5 days after the last dose. Spleens, livers, and lungs were homogenized, and viable cell counts were determined by serial dilution and plating onto Middlebrook 7H10 agar. A dose-related reduction in MAC cell counts in the organs was noted for this MAC isolate. The comparative activities of rifabutin and rifapentine were determined against a total of five MAC isolates in the beige mouse model. Rifabutin or rifapentine (20 mg/kg each) was administered to infected mice for 10 days. Groups of treated mice were compared with untreated control animals. Despite favorable in vitro susceptibility results, rifabutin and rifapentine had activities in the spleens against only two of the five MAC isolates. For these two MAC isolates, rifabutin was more active than rifapentine. These agents had activities in the lungs against three of five isolates. Further study of rifabutin or rifapentine against a broader range of clinical isolates in a murine infection model may be useful as part of the continuing development of newer rifamycins as anti-MAC agents.

Full text

PDF
234

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Agins B. D., Berman D. S., Spicehandler D., el-Sadr W., Simberkoff M. S., Rahal J. J. Effect of combined therapy with ansamycin, clofazimine, ethambutol, and isoniazid for Mycobacterium avium infection in patients with AIDS. J Infect Dis. 1989 Apr;159(4):784–787. doi: 10.1093/infdis/159.4.784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cynamon M. H. Comparative in vitro activities of MDL 473, rifampin, and ansamycin against Mycobacterium intracellulare. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Sep;28(3):440–441. doi: 10.1128/aac.28.3.440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cynamon M. H., Klemens S. P. Activity of azithromycin against Mycobacterium avium infection in beige mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Aug;36(8):1611–1613. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.8.1611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dickinson J. M., Mitchison D. A. In vitro activity of new rifamycins against rifampicin-resistant M. tuberculosis and MAIS-complex mycobacteria. Tubercle. 1987 Sep;68(3):177–182. doi: 10.1016/0041-3879(87)90053-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gangadharam P. R., Perumal V. K., Jairam B. T., Rao P. N., Nguyen A. K., Farhi D. C., Iseman M. D. Activity of rifabutin alone or in combination with clofazimine or ethambutol or both against acute and chronic experimental Mycobacterium intracellulare infections. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987 Aug;136(2):329–333. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/136.2.329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Heifets L. B., Iseman M. D., Lindholm-Levy P. J., Kanes W. Determination of ansamycin MICs for Mycobacterium avium complex in liquid medium by radiometric and conventional methods. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Oct;28(4):570–575. doi: 10.1128/aac.28.4.570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Heifets L. B., Lindholm-Levy P. J., Flory M. A. Bactericidal activity in vitro of various rifamycins against Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990 Mar;141(3):626–630. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/141.3.626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Horsburgh C. R., Jr Mycobacterium avium complex infection in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1991 May 9;324(19):1332–1338. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199105093241906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hoy J., Mijch A., Sandland M., Grayson L., Lucas R., Dwyer B. Quadruple-drug therapy for Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare bacteremia in AIDS patients. J Infect Dis. 1990 Apr;161(4):801–805. doi: 10.1093/infdis/161.4.801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Klemens S. P., Cynamon M. H. Activity of rifapentine against Mycobacterium avium infection in beige mice. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1992 May;29(5):555–561. doi: 10.1093/jac/29.5.555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Klemens S. P., Cynamon M. H. In vivo activities of newer rifamycin analogs against Mycobacterium avium infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Oct;35(10):2026–2030. doi: 10.1128/aac.35.10.2026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Klemens S. P., DeStefano M. S., Cynamon M. H. Activity of clarithromycin against Mycobacterium avium complex infection in beige mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Nov;36(11):2413–2417. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.11.2413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Orme I. M. Antimycobacterial activity in vivo of LM427 (rifabutin). Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988 Nov;138(5):1254–1257. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/138.5.1254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Saito H., Sato K., Tomioka H. Comparative in vitro and in vivo activity of rifabutin and rifampicin against Mycobacterium avium complex. Tubercle. 1988 Sep;69(3):187–192. doi: 10.1016/0041-3879(88)90020-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES