Skip to main content
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
letter
. 2010 Apr 1;60(573):293. doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X483986

Diagnostic safety-netting

Anthony Seneviratne 1
PMCID: PMC2845491

Congratulations on your article that is very helpful for developing countries.1 As you have mentioned, undifferentiated presentations and uncertainty in management are an important issue to GPs. I wish to include three clear situations:

  • You may see the obvious ‘redflag’ that you will not miss or take a chance with. A middle-age female who presents with sudden onset, severe headache that she has not experienced before and no physical signs detected. This may be a subarachnoid hemorrhage even though you cannot exclude a first attack of migraine. Do not take any chances, play it safe.

  • May expect a ‘redflag’ later. The article1 mentioned that in some situations the time period is certain; for example, head injury leading to subdural hematoma. I do not agree as the safety-netting period may depend on so many factors. Site of injury, severity of injury, and age. Another classic example: a patient with heartburn has a normal ECG suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux disease. As you are aware 50% of ECGs in the first 6 hours could be normal. You may repeat after 6 hours and may rule out an infarct. I have seen a frank MI showing in the ECG even after 24–48 hours.

  • A patient who has typical features suggestive of IBS has a diagnosis card indicating the same. The same patient is diagnosed with colonic carcinoma after 6 months. Have you misdiagnosed or have they developed a colonic carcinoma later?

These are questions we have to answer in general practice.

REFERENCE


Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES