Skip to main content
Canadian Urological Association Journal logoLink to Canadian Urological Association Journal
. 2010 Apr;4(2):E55–E57. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.831

Metastatic signet-ring cell cancer of the bladder responding to chemotherapy with capecitabine: case report and review of literature

Jorg Michels *,, Sean Barbour , Douglas Cavers , Kim N Chi §
PMCID: PMC2845673  PMID: 20368884

Abstract

Signet-ring cell cancers deriving from the bladder are rare entities and usually present with advanced incurable disease and associated poor outlook. No standard effective chemotherapeutic option has been described largely due to the rarity of this malignancy. We report a case of a patient with metastatic bladder cancer, signet-ring cell variant. The patient progressed rapidly on standard first-line bladder cancer chemotherapy with gemcitabine and carboplatin. He responded well to second-line capecitabine with a clinically meaningful progression-free survival.

Introduction

Bladder cancer is the fifth most common malignancy in Canada.1 Urothelial carcinoma of the transitional cell type is the most prevalent histological subtype in about 90% of patients, and the use of modern platinum-based combination chemotherapy has translated in significant clinical benefit in patients with advanced stage disease.2 Adenocarcinoma of the bladder comprises only 0.5% to 2% of all epithelial bladder tumours and primary signet-ring cell carcinoma, a variant of adenocarcinoma, is extremely rare with a prevalence estimated at 0.24% of primary bladder cancers; no effective systemic chemotherapy has been established for this subtype.3 We report a case of widespread metastatic signet-ring cell carcinoma variant of bladder cancer that responded well to second-line chemotherapy with capecitabine; we also review the literature.

Case report

An 81-year-old Asian man presented with obstructive urinary symptoms. Physical examination revealed an indurated prostate and inguinal lymphadenopathy. Computed tomography (CT) demonstrated marked bladder wall thickening, an enlarged prostate, pelvic and inguinal lymphandenopathy, diffuse liver and bony metastases and a normal appearing gastrointestinal tract (Fig. 1, refer to A/C). A bone scan confirmed widespread metastases. Cystocopic evaluation of the bladder demonstrated no obvious mucosal lesion, but significant obstruction of the bladder neck. Pathology of transurethral resection specimen revealed prostatic tissue with diffuse infiltration by large areas of signet-ring carcinoma interspersed with poorly differentiated urothelial cancer (Fig. 2, refer to A/B).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Axial computer tomographic images. Corresponding imaging sections before (A/C) and at end (B/D) of capecitabine chemotherapy are demonstrated. Marked bladder wall thickening with significant pelvic/inguinal lymphadenopathy and multiple liver metastases are noted (red arrows) on baseline computer tomography.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Pathology and Immunohistochemistry. The microscopic presence of 2 different malignant cell populations (A) is seen on hematoxylin and eosin stain on low power field (signet-ring cells are marked with open arrow, poorly differentiated urothelial carcinoma with closed arrow). Signet-ring cells stained positive for carcinoembryonic antigen on immunohistochemistry (B).

Immunohistochemical staining of tumour tissue was negative for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and prostate-specific acid phosphatase, strongly positive for cytokeratin (CK) 7/20/ carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), strong nuclear positive for caudal-related homeobox 2 (CDX2) and negative staining for CK5/6. Serum tumour marker panel revealed normal PSA and serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) levels, elevated levels of CEA (12 μg/L, upper limit of normal [ULN] = 4 μg/L) and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 (160 kU/L, ULN = 36 kU/L). Baseline renal function was impaired (calculated glomerular filtration rate of 42 mL/min) and liver function tests were normal.

The patient was started on combination chemotherapy of gemcitabine and carboplatin for TNM stage T4N2M1 poorly differentiated bladder cancer, signet-cell variant. He progressed after his first cycle of treatment with worsening of obstructive urinary symptoms, enlarging left inguinal lymph nodes, worsening of CEA and CA 19-9 levels (Fig. 3) and mild worsening of liver function tests (alkaline phosphates, aspartate aminotransferase and alanine transmaninase all less than 5 times the ULN). The patient received pelvic radio-therapy (2100 cGy in 3 fractions) for local control. He subsequently received 6 cycles of second-line chemotherapy with capecitabine. The patient tolerated treatment well, and his cancer-related symptoms normalized, as did his tumour markers and liver function tests. Post-treatment CT (Fig. 1, refer to B/D) confirmed response to treatment with significant shrinkage of the number and size of liver metastases, reduction in tumour-related bladder wall-thickening and lymphandenopathy. The patient was well post-chemotherapy and travelled to his family in China. Upon return, he developed progressive disease 9 months after he had started his first course of capecitabine. He was rechallenged with capecitabine and initially responded well, clinically and on tumour marker assessment (Fig. 3). Unfortunately, he deteriorated rapidly after his third cycle of treatment with tumour-related obstructive jaundice and succumbed from liver failure 12 months after initial diagnosis.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Tumour marker kinetics during chemotherapy. Serial serum levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen are shown immediately prior to gemcitabine/carboplatin (open arrow) and following chemotherapy cycles with capecitabine (closed arrows).

Discussion

Pure primary signet-ring cell carcinomas of the bladder are very rare and only a few case reports exist of a mixed urothelial/signet-ring cell variant.3,4 Saphir first described primary signet-ring cell carcinoma of the bladder in 1955, and less than 200 cases have been reported in the literature since then.5,6 There is a male preponderance and most patients present at an advanced stage. This appears related to a linitis plastic-like growth pattern rendering cystoscopic detection difficult and the outlook poor.7

Adeno- or signet-ring cell carcinomas identified in the bladder are rare entities and may represent metastases from other primary sites, usually from the gastrointestinal tract. Clinical imaging and immunohistochemical findings in our patient were compatible with the primary source of signet cell cancer arising from the bladder. Our case demonstrated mixed histology with predominant signet-ring cells interspersed with poorly differentiated urothelial cancer. Tumour tissue stained positive for CK7/20 and CDX2 but negative for PSA/Placental alkaline phosphatase (PLAP). Colorectal cancers are often CK7− but CK20+/CDX2+; prostate cancers are PSA+/PLAP+/CDX2−; and upper gastrointestinal tract tumours are usually CK7+ with variable CDX2/CK20 staining.8,9 The histogenesis of primary signet cell cancer in the bladder is not well-understood, and include metaplasia of transitional cell carcinoma.10,11 The coexistent signet-ring cell carcinoma and poorly differentiated urothelial cancer in our case may support such hypothesis.

Treatment of signet-ring variants of bladder cancer is not well-defined due to the rarity of the tumour. Cystectomy is indicated for localized disease and intra-arterial platinium or methotrexate-based chemotherapy with or without radio-therapy to control localized disease with prolonged progression-free survival have been reported.12,13 However, there is no systemic standard chemotherapy regimen for advanced disease, which in general is considered chemotherapy resistant.3 Our patient failed to respond to standard platinium-based chemotherapy for bladder cancer, but derived a meaningful clinical benefit from capecitabine, an orally bioavailable 5-fluorouracil (FU) prodrug. Case reports of signet-ring cell carcinoma originating from different primary sites but also adenocarcinomas of the bladder indicate similar experiences in as much that responses, if encountered, appear to follow 5-FU-based regimens.1416

The kinetics of plasma CA19-9/CEA levels in our patient accurately matched the clinical and imaging behavior of the tumour. Elevated serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and CEA has been found to be elevated in signet-ring cell carcinoma in the past.17,18 Serum CA19-9 and CEA levels hence may provide simple and useful biomarkers to assess treatment efficacy in this tumour entity.

Conclusion

The overall outcome for signet-ring cell cancers in general is very poor. The significant response in our patient (following capecitabine and after failing on standard chemotherapy for bladder cancer) and similar findings in the literature appear to indicate that 5-FU-based regimens should be considered the preferred first-line chemotherapeutic choice for patients with signet-ring cell transformation of bladder cancer.

Footnotes

Competing interests: None declared.

This paper has been peer-reviewed.

References

  • 1.Marrett LD, De P, Airia P, et al. for the Steering Committee of Canadian Cancer Statistics 2008 Cancer in Canada in 2008. CMAJ. 2008;179:1163–70. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.080760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.von der Maase H, Hansen SW, Roberts JT, et al. Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in advanced or metastatic bladder cancer: results of a large, randomized, multinational, multicenter, phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:3068–77. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.17.3068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Holmang S, Borghede G, Johansson SL. Primary signet-ring cell carcinoma of the bladder: a report on 10 cases. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1997;31:145–8. doi: 10.3109/00365599709070320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ozeki Z, Kobayashi S, Machida T, et al. Transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder accompanied by signet-ring cell carcinoma: a case report [in Japanese] Hinyokika Kiyo. 2003;49:411–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Saphir O. Signet-ring cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Am J Pathol. 1955;31:223–31. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fiter L, Gimeno F, Martin L, et al. Signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma of bladder. Urology. 1993;41:30–3. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(93)90239-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Torenbeek R, Koot RA, Blomjous CE, et al. Primary signet-ring cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Histopathology. 1996;28:33–40. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.1996.262303.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jiang J, Ulbright TM, Younger C, et al. Cytokeratin 7 and cytokeratin 20 in primary urinary bladder carcinoma and matched lymph node metastasis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2001;125:921–3. doi: 10.5858/2001-125-0921-CACIPU. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Werling RW, Yaziji H, Bacchi CE, et al. CDX2, a highly sensitive and specific marker of adenocarcinomas of intestinal origin: an immunohistochemical survey of 476 primary and metastatic carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27:303–10. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200303000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Moll C, Landolt U, Pedio G. Signet-ring cell differentiation of transitional cell carcinomas of the bladder. Acta Cytol. 1996;40:619–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kunze E, Francksen B. Histogenesis of nonurothelial carcinomas of the urinary bladder from pre-existent transitional cell carcinomas. A histopathological and immunohistochemical study. Urol Res. 2002;30:66–78. doi: 10.1007/s00240-001-0232-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hirano Y, Suzuki K, Fujita K, et al. Primary signet-ring cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder successfully treated with intra-arterial chemotherapy alone. Urology. 2002;59:601. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01676-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Krichen Makni S, Ellouz S, Khabir A, et al. Primary signet-ring cell carcinoma of urinary bladder. A case report [in French] Cancer Radiother. 2005;9:332–4. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2005.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Heidemann J, Gockel HR, Winde G, et al. Signet-ring cell carcinoma of unknown primary location. Metastatic to lower back musculature - remission following FU/FA chemotherapy. Z Gastroenterol. 2002;40:33–6. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-19634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mizoshita T, Kataoka H, Kubota E, et al. Gastric phenotype signet-ring cell carcinoma of the stomach with multiple bone metastases effectively treated with sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil. Int J Clin Oncol. 2008;13:373–6. doi: 10.1007/s10147-007-0750-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Logothetis CJ, Samuels ML, Ogden S. Chemotherapy for adenocarcinomas of bladder and urachal origin: 5-Fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and mitomycin-C. Urology. 1985;26:252–5. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(85)90121-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.el Sandid M, Peraldi R, Pernin F. Linitis plastica type of primary signet cell adenocarcinoma of the bladder [in French] Prog Urol. 2002;12:313–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hiramatsu K, Mizukami Y, Momiyama M, et al. Stage IV gastric cancer patient who underwent palliative gastrectomy showing complete response to induction therapy with methotrexate plus 5-fluorouracil and secondary treatment with oral TS-1 [in Japanese] Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2005;32:1163–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Urological Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Urological Association

RESOURCES