Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 26.
Published in final edited form as: J Nat Prod. 2010 Mar 26;73(3):313–316. doi: 10.1021/np900697s

Caste-Specific Tyramides from Myrmicine Ants#

Tappey H Jones 1,*,, H Martin Garraffo 1,, Thomas F Spande 1,, Nirina R Andriamaharavo 1,, Jeffrey S T Gorman 1,, Alexander J Snyder 1,, Andrew W Jeter 1,, Juan A Torres 1,§,, Roy R Snelling 1,II,, John W Daly 1,‡,°
PMCID: PMC2846196  NIHMSID: NIHMS173962  PMID: 20102169

Abstract

Analysis of the extracts of male ants of Monomorium minimum and M. ebeninum, by GC-MS and GC-FTIR revealed the presence of tyramides 2 and 4c, for which the structures were established by comparison with synthetic samples. These compounds and their analogs 1 and 3 were also found in males of other Monomorium species, males of Myrmicaria opaciventris, and males of several Solenopsis (Diplorhoptrum) species. Vapor-phase FTIR spectra revealed critically important structural clues to two of the tyramides, which had methyl-branching in the tyramide acyl moiety. Tyramide 4c exhibited a strong intramolecular amide NH hydrogen bond where an α-keto group was deduced to be present in the acyl moiety and also showed the overlap of this ketone group frequency with that of the amide νC=O. The biological function of these compounds is uncertain; however their role in ant-mating behavior may be suggested by a large body of evidence.


Ring-saturated nitrogen heterocycles are well-known components of the venoms of ants in the subfamily Myrmicinae, particularly in the genera Megalomyrmex, Monomorium, Myrmicaria, and Solenopsis.14 While different species of ants may have some of the same alkaloids, the alkaloid composition of a particular species seems to be characteristic, varying only with the age of the ants.5 In several cases, a marked difference has been observed between the venom alkaloids produced by queens and those produced by workers of a particular species.6,7 The venom alkaloids found in the workers, and in some cases the queens, of the species reported in this investigation, Monomorium minimum, M. pharaonis, M. floricola, Myrmicaria opaciventris, Solenopsis molesta and S. maboya, have been described, while those of Monomorium ebeninum are very similar to M. miminum.1,79 These compounds are conspicuously absent in the extracts of all male ants in these genera, which do not have venom glands. Herein we describe, however, not the presence of alkaloids, but the occurrence of a set of acylated tyramines (1–3, 4c) from males of nine species of the genera Monomorium, Myrmicaria, and Solenopsis (Diplorhoptrum). Compounds 1-3 have been previously reported from marine bacteria,10 while the α–ketoamide 4c is a new compound.

graphic file with name nihms173962u1.jpg

Results and Discussion

In the summer of 1995 and 1996, males of the small black ant Monomorium minimum Buckley, common in the eastern United States, were collected from nests in Lexington, Virginia. The initial gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis of CH2Cl2 extracts of these specimens revealed the presence of two compounds, 2 and 4c, for which the mass spectra had a m/z = 120 (100) and a significant ion at m/z 107. In one experiment, trisection of M. minimum revealed by GC-MS that these compounds occur in the gaster of the ants. Subsequently, males of the other species listed in Table 1 were examined. Trisection of M. ebeninum showed that these compounds also were found only in the gasters of the ants. Extracts of whole ants only, were available for the remaining species. Trisection of myrmicine workers has never shown tyramides.

Table 1.

Distribution of Tyramides from Myrmicine Ants.

species dates collected 1 2 3 4c

Monomorium minimum 1995 & 1996 * *
Monomorium ebeninum 1996 & 2003 * *
Monomorium floricola 1999 *
Monomorium pharaonis 1999 *
Myrmicaria opaciventris 2003 *
Solenopsis nr. molesta 1993 *
Solenopsis #11 PR 1995 *
Solenopsis #78 PR 1998 *
Solenopsis maboya 1999 & 2000 *

In M. minimum, the first component had the following GC-FTIR spectrum: νmax 3652, 3466, 3016, 2968, 2936, 2887, 1707(s), 1613, 1500(s), 1443, 1332, 1256, 1173, 1106, 821 cm−1; EIMS m/z 207 [M+.] (2), 164 (1), 121 (13), 120 (100), 107 (41), 91 (1), 88 (24), 77 (22), 71 (36), 55 (5), 43 (77), 41 (25). HRMS m/z 207.1254, calcd for C12H17NO2, 207.1259. Its mass spectrum and GC retention time (20.0 min) were identical to those of an authentic sample of N-[2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)ethyl]butanamide (2).11

The second and roughly equimolar component at Rt 21.0 min had an EIMS m/z 249 [M+.] (2), 234 (1), 206 (1), 164 (4), 121 (35), 120 (100), 107 (22), 91 (9), 85 (13), 77 (18), 57 (40), 43 (8), 41 (20). Initially, it was assumed that this component was a three-carbon homolog of 2; however, the high-resolution mass spectrum (HRMS m/z 249.1361, calcd for C14H19NO3, 249.1365) indicated the presence of a third oxygen and another double bond equivalent. The GC-FTIR of this component had νmax 3652, 3429, 3019, 2968, 2938, 2885, 1707(s), 1614, 1513(s), 1439, 1365, 1336, 1258, 1172, 1102, 820 cm−1 The frequency (3429 cm−1) of the secondary amide NH of this component was shifted to a lower frequency by 37 cm−1 suggesting that an intramolecular hydrogen-bond was present. The lack of an obvious infrared absorption for the third oxygen, e.g. a ketone or epoxide functionality, presumed to be in the acyl portion of the amide, was perplexing. The six double bond equivalents determined from the HRMS in comparison with five found for 2 could be consistent with (1) a hydroxyl group and double bond, (2) an epoxide, (3) a ketone or (4) a ring with an ether oxygen. No additional hydroxyl frequency was observed in addition to the sharp phenolic νOH at 3652 cm −1 nor was any internal/terminal olefinic ν=CH absorption noted, ruling out the first possibility. No unambiguous absorptions for an epoxide could be ascertained, but an α-keto group in the acyl moiety could not be excluded, since a few examples we were aware of have this absorption coupled to the ester or amide absorption and sometimes are seen as a single absorption band.12 Nonetheless, it was assumed that an ether νC-O might be present but was difficult to detect by IR spectroscopy and consequently three tyramides were synthesized having a cyclic methyl, tetrahydro-furanyl ether, a tetrahydro-pyranyl ether or an α-β epoxide group, all of which might be expected to provide a hydrogen-bond receptor for the observed amide NH donor. This synthetic work and that of other preliminary structural possibilities for the m/z 249 tyramide will be reported elsewhere. None fit the GC-MS or GC-FTIR behavior of the m/z 249 tyramide so the structural possibility (4) above, although biosynthetically attractive, was made less likely. Not all permutations of cyclic ethers were synthesized since about this time we discovered by a close examination of the amide I/amide II band ratio in the m/z 249 tyramide infrared spectrum, the likely presence of a ketone group in the acyl group, most probably in the α-position. This conclusion arose from observing that the ratio of the amide I to amide II bands in the natural molecular weight 249 tyramide was appreciably greater than that seen in 2 as well as those seen with all of the other non- α-keto-tyramides, where the amide II band at 1500–1505 cm−1 is significantly more intense than the amide I band. We concluded, therefore, that the stretching vibration of the α-keto group coincides with that of the amide νC=O group, enhancing its intensity, and is an example of the “coupling effect” that has been reported for amides.13 The above-mentioned shift in the amide NH to a lower frequency that suggested H-bonding to an oxygen function, is consistent with an α-keto group being an H-bond acceptor.

Small amounts of the α-ketoamides (4a–c) for GC-MS and GC-FTIR comparison with the natural α-ketoamide were prepared by careful oxidation of the corresponding α–hydroxyamides (5a–c) with Jones reagent at 0 °C (Scheme 1). The hydroxyamides 5a–c formed nearly quantitatively by coupling 2-hydroxyhexanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-3-methylpentanoic acid, or 2-hydroxy-4-methylpentanoic acid14 with tyramine in the presence of EDCI/HOBT. Numerous oxidation methods of the hydroxyamides were attempted, including PCC, PDC, CrO3 on celite, chromic acid/ether, Swern oxidation, and Dess-Martin periodinane, but the Jones reagent at 0 °C for 10 min, although providing low yields (10–20%), gave clean samples of the α-ketoamides after flash chromatography. A great improvement in the oxidations of 5a and 5c was achieved by air-oxidation with a catalytic amount of V2O5 in toluene at 90–100 °C 15 where 4a and 4c were obtained, respectively, in ca. 60% yield after chromatography.

Scheme 1. Synthesis of 2-ketohexanoyltyramines 4a–c.

Scheme 1

i. EDCI, HOBT, DMF ii. Jones Reagent or O2, V2O5, toluene, Δ

The straight-chain analog (4a) was first synthesized and found non-identical with the natural tyramide but it was recognized by close inspection of the νC-H region (see Figure 1), that the asymmetric vibration at ca. 2968 cm−1 relative to the νC-H methylene stretching vibration at 2938 cm−1 indicated that another methyl group was clearly present in the acyl moiety of the natural tyramide. This “methyl-counting” method had earlier been applied by one of us (H.M.G) to the assignment of a tentative structure to a novel homo-pumiliotoxin alkaloid 249F found in an Argentine toad.16

Figure 1.

Figure 1

FTIR vapor-phase spectrum of the natural α-ketotyramide from males of the ant Monomorium minimum. Insets are of the νC-H region of synthetic 4a, 4c and 4b from left to right.

The C-H bending vibrations at ca. 1385 cm−1 gave no clear evidence of a gem- dimethyl group so a 2-keto-3-methyl pentanoyl tyramide (4b) was then synthesized. Although very similar in its MS and IR spectra, it was not identical with the natural tyramide leaving a 2-keto-4-methylpentanoyl tyramide (4c) as the remaining likely structural possibility for the m/z 249 tyramide. Synthesis of 2-keto-4-methylpentanoyl tyramide (4c) finally revealed that the natural m/z 249 tyramide possesses this same structure, despite the fact that the gem-dimethyl absorption, expected for such an “iso” structure is not unambiguously evident. The mass spectrum, gas chromatographic retention time, and GC-FTIR spectrum of the natural tyramide matched that shown for 4c as depicted in Figure 1.

Evidence for oxygen functionality at the α-position of the tyramide acyl moiety was also deduced from the EIMS of the natural m/z 249 tyramide where a cleavage between the acyl amide C=O and the adjacent ketone carbon is seen giving an m/z 85 (12%) fragment and a related weak but diagnostic fragment at m/z 164 (2.4 %) is seen as an indication that both cleavage fragments carry charge. No cleavage for 4c was observed between the acyl carbonyl and the amide nitrogen yielding a minor or even significant fragment ion at m/z 130 which occurs in all the other tyramides lacking an α-keto- or α-hydroxyl substituent. The major fragments of all the tyramides are governed by cleavage at the benzylic position to afford the m/z 107 ion (ca. 40%) and a McLafferty rearrangement to yield as the base peak, the m/z 120 ion, having a p-hydroxystyrene structure.

After the structures of 2 and 4c were established in males of M. minimum and M. ebeninum, extracts of the other male ants listed in Table 1 were examined and the structures of tyramides 1, 2, and 3 were determined by spectroscopic analysis and comparison with synthetic material.11, 17 These tyramides have not been detected in extracts of workers or queens of any of the species in Table 1 over the many years of this study.

While the biological role of these tyramides is as yet undetermined, their occurrence exclusively in males of the species examined suggests that they may have a function in the mating behavior in these ants where a fair amount of field research already exists that indicates a role for the involvement of some pheromone, such as these compounds.18 Male-specific compounds have been reported in other ant subfamilies for many years.19,20 Ant-mating behavior can be divided into a female-calling syndrome and a male-aggregation syndrome. In the latter, males first attract additional males and the buildup of pheromones later attracts females.21 For example, in a species of the myrmicine genus Crematogaster, the males occupy the top portion of the swarm and the females are attracted to that area and occupy the bottom portion of the swarm.22

Of the genera examined here, in Monomorium (= Chelaner) both syndromes have been observed for particular species. 23 In Myrmicaria opaciventris, it has been observed that the winged males leave the nest first, followed by the alate females and mating takes place in flight, an activity that may imply the presence of an attractant or flight-initiating signal emitted by the male ants.24 Finally, it should be noted that the Solenopsis males that were available for this investigation are members of the subgenus Diplorhoptrum, commonly known as “thief ants”, a group whose workers and queens contain a wide variety of venom alkaloids.1,6 These ants are mostly subterranean, with extremely difficult taxonomy, and very little is known about their mating behavior.25 Collections #11 and 78 from Puerto Rico may be Solenopsis azteca, S. pygmaea or S. torresi, previously described species of thief ants found in the same region.25 Since the mating flights of congeneric ant species have been observed to be separated spatially and temporally,26 the production of the same tyramide (3) in the thief ant males as in S. maboya may not be problematic if it were part of their mating behavior. More research is needed to clarify the role of these unusual and uncommon tyramides in the natural history of myrmicine ants, in particular to confirm a role in mating.

Experimental Section

General Experimental Procedures

GC-MS was carried out in the EI mode using a Shimadzu QP-5000 GC-MS equipped with an RTX-5, 30 m × 0.25 mm i.d. column. The instrument was programmed from 60 °C to 250 °C at 10 °/min. Vapor phase FTIR spectra were obtained using a Hewlett-Packard model 5965B detector interfaced with a Hewlett-Packard 5890 gas chromatograph fitted with a 30 m × 0.25 mm RTX-5 amine column and a temperature program from 100 °C to 280 °C at 10 °C/min or occasionally slower ramps. Some work used a Phenomenex “Inferno” column (30 m × 0.22 mm). NMR spectroscopy was carried out in CDCl3 solutions using a Varian Mercury 400 NMR spectrometer. HRMS was performed on a JEOL SX102 instrument in the positive-ion fast-atom bombardment mode using a direct probe and a Waters LCT Premier Time of Flight instrument in the electrospray (ESI) or APCI mode.

Ants

Two collections of Monomorium minimum Buckley males were collected in July of 1995 and again in July, 1996 in Lexington, VA. In each collection, 10–20 individuals were obtained and placed in vials containing a small amount of methanol for analysis. One of the 1996 collections was frozen while still alive, the frozen ants were trisected and their heads, thoraxes and gasters were placed in separate vials containing a small amount of methanol. A collection of M. ebinenum Forel males was made in Guaynabo, Puerto Rico (PR) in June, 1996, another in July, 1996 and a third collection was made in July, 2003 in Cayey, PR. One of the 1996 collections of M. ebeninum was trisected and their heads, thoraxes and gasters were placed in separate vials containing a small amount of methanol. M. floricola Jerdon males were collected in May 1999 in Guaynabo, PR. M. pharaonis L. males were collected in July, 1996 at Gainesville, FL, and these ants were placed in vials containing a small amount of methylene chloride for analysis. Myrmicaria opaciventris workers, males and queens were collected in March, 2003 in Kakamega Distr., Isecheno, Kakamega Forest, Kenya, and placed in vials containing methanol. Solenopsis nr molesta were collected in May, 1993 in Chuckawalla Mountains, Red Cloud Canyon at 8 mi. South Southeast of Desert Center, Riverside County, CA. Solenopsis maboya Snelling were collected in Guaynabo, PR in February, 1999 and January, 2000, Solenopsis #11 males were collected May, 1995 near Guaynabo, PR, and Solenopsis #78 males were collected in June, 1998 near Guaynabo, PR. The distribution of tyramides found in these species is shown in Table 1. Voucher specimens have been deposited in the entomological collection of the Los Angeles County Natural History Museum.

N-[2-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)ethyl]-2-hydroxyhexanamide (5a)

A solution containing 0.26 g of 2-hydroxyhexanoic acid14 (2 mmol), 0.26 g of tyramine, 0.27 g of 1-hydroxybenzotriazole (HOBT) and 0.4 g of N-ethyl-N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDCI) in 8 mL of DMF was stirred overnight at room temperature. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was partitioned between 2% HCl and diethyl ether. The ether layer was dried over anhydrous MgSO4. After filtration, the solvent was removed to provide 0.55 g of 5a: 13C NMR (100 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 174.54, 156.31, 130.08 (2C), 130.05, 115.76 (2C), 71.61, 35.11, 34.74, 27.46, 22.74, 14.57 (the CH2NH signal was obscured by the solvent signal); EIMS m/z 251 [M+] (1), 194 (1), 164 (1), 132 (4), 121 (17), 120 (100), 107 (12), 91 (3), 77 (6), 69 (5); HRMS m/z 251.1570 (calcd for C14H21NO3, 251.1521).

N-[2-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)ethyl]-2-hydroxy-3-methylpentanamide (5b)

A solution containing 0.26 g of 2-hydroxy-3-methylpentanoic acid14 (2 mmol) was condensed with tyramine as described for 5a to provide 0.8 g of a mixture that was 70% pure, with the remainder being benzotriazole. 1H NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO ) δ 7.29 (5H, m), 4.48 (1H, t, J = 5.2 Hz), 4.09 (2H, dd, J = 11.6 and 5 Hz), 3.75 (4H, m), 2.78 (2H, m), 2.60 (1H, m), 2.07 (1H, m), 1.8-1.4 (13H, br m); 13C NMR (100 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 173.77, 156.27, 130.11 (2C), 130.08, 115.74 (2C), 75.72, 38.72, 35.11, 23.69, 16.31, 12.44, (the CH2NH signal was obscured by the solvent signal); EIMS m/z 251 [M+] (1), 194 (2), 164 (2), 132 (6), 121 (17), 120 (100), 107 (11), 91 (4), 77 (8), 45 (9). HRMS m/z 251.1543 (calcd for C14H21NO3, 251.1521).

N-[2-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)ethyl]-2-hydroxy-4-methylpentanamide (5c)

A solution containing 0.26 g of 2-hydroxy-4-methylpentanoic acid14 (2 mmol) was condensed with tyramine as described for 5a. 13C NMR (100 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 174.93, 156.28, 130.14 (2C), 130.1, 115.75 (2C), 70.22, 44.17, 35.08, 24.54, 24.12, 22.20. (the CH2NH signal was obscured by the solvent signal); EIMS m/z 251 [M+] (1), 194 (1), 164(2), 132 (3), 121 (16), 120 (100), 107 (13), 91 (3), 77 (6), 45 (1), 43 (6); HRMS m/z 251.1521 (calcd for C14H21NO3, 251.1521).

N-[2-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)ethyl]-2-oxohexanamide (4a)

A solution containing 60 mg of 5a in 3 mL of toluene and 20 mg of V2O5 was heated at 100 °C overnight. The cooled solution was filtered through a short column of Florisil to provide 45 mg of 4a that was more than 75% pure by GC-MS analysis. No starting material remained. 1H NMR of the crude material (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.93 (2H, d, J = 8.2 Hz), 6.74 (2H, d, J = 8.2 Hz), 3.43 (2H, q, J = 5 Hz), 3.41 (1H, m), 2.83 (2H, t, J = 7 Hz), 2.68 (2H, t, J = 6.8 Hz), 2.10 (1H, s), 1.50 (2H, quintet, J = 7 Hz), 1.25 (2H, sextet, J = 7 Hz), 0.82 ( 3H, t, J = 7.1 Hz); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 198.18, 159.17, 153.71, 128.84 (2C), 128.84, 114.63 (2C), 39.72, 35.44, 33.49, 24.20, 21.15, 12.79; EIMS m/z 249 [M+] (1), 164 (5), 121 (30), 120 (100), 107 (25), 91 (6), 85 (9), 77 (13), 57 (20); HRCIMS [M+H]+ m/z 250.1445 (calcd for C14H20NO3, 250.1443).

N-[2-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)ethyl]-3-methyl-2-oxopentanamide (4b)

A solution containing 0.5 g (2 mmol) of crude 5b in 20 mL of acetone was cooled to 0 °C and treated with 2 mL of Jones reagent. After 15 min, 3 mL of 2-propanol were added and the solution was taken up in 50 mL of ether. The solution was dried over anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. Flash chromatography with silica gel (hexane/ethyl acetate) provided 60 mg of 4b for spectroscopic analysis. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.97 ( 2H, d, J = 8.2 Hz), 6.72 (2H, d, J = 8.2 Hz), 3.44 (2H, q, J = 5 Hz), 3.41, (1H, m), 2.70 (2H, d, J = 7 Hz), 2.7 (2H, J = 6.8 Hz), 2.08 (1H, m), 1.01 (2H, d, J = 7 Hz), 0.81 ( 3H, t, J = 7.1 Hz); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 201.19, 159.08, 153.90, 128.75 (2C), 128.67, 114.63 (2C), 39.82, 39.37, 33.50, 24.38, 14.07, 10.45; EIMS m/z 249 [M+] (1), 164 (7), 121 (42), 120 (100), 107 (16), 91 (6), 85 (10), 77 (11), 57 (50); HRCIMS [M+H]+ m/z 250.1442 (calcd for C14H20NO3, 250.1443).

N-[2-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)ethyl]-4-methyl-2-oxopentanamide (4c)

A solution with the same amounts of reactants (but with 5c instead of 5a) as described for 4a provided 38 mg of 4c after flash chromatography. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.97 (2H, d, J = 8.2 Hz), 6.72 (2H, d, J = 8.2 Hz), 3.44 (2H, q, J = 5 Hz), 5.70 (2H, br m) 2.70 (2H, t, J = 6.8 Hz), 2.08 (1H, m), 0.86 ( 6H, d, J = 6.8 Hz); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 199.06, 160.48, 154.83, 130.24, 130.03 (2C), 115.84 (2C), 45.48, 40.96, 34.75, 24.58, 22.75 (2C); EIMS m/z 249 [M+] (3), 164 (7), 121 (37), 120 (100), 107 (20), 91 (3), 85 (9), 77 (9), 57 (25), 41 (8); HRCIMS [M+H]+ m/z 250.1443 (calcd for C14H20NO3, 250.1443).

The gas chromatographic retention time, mass spectrum and FTIR spectrum of 4c were identical to those of the α-ketotyramide found in Monomorium minimum, M. ebeninum, and M. pharaonis.

Acknowledgments

We thank Lloyd Davis for the sample of Monomorium pharaonis males and Gordon C. Snelling for the sample of Solenopsis nr. molesta males and a great deal of archival work in the collections at the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History. We thank John Lloyd, for direct probe HRESIMS, Noel Whittaker for HRCIMS on synthetic 4a – 4c, and Lewis Pannell (all of NIDDK) for the original HRMS of 2 and 4c. The research done at NIH was supported by the intramural research funds of NIDDK.

Footnotes

#

Dedicated to the late Dr. John W. Daly of NIDDK, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland for his pioneering work on bioactive natural products.

References and Notes

  • 1.Jones TH, Blum MS, Fales HM. Tetrahedron. 1982;38:1949–1958. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Numata A, Ibuka T. In: The Alkaloids. Brossi A, editor. Vol. 31. Academic Press; New York: 1987. pp. 193–315. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jones TH, DeVries PJ, Escoubas P. J Chem Ecol. 1991;17:2507–2517. doi: 10.1007/BF00994598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jones TH, Voegtle HL, Miras HM, Weatherford RG, Spande TF, Garraffo HM, Daly JW, Davidson DW, Snelling RR, Gorman JST, Snelling RR, Delabie JHC, Blum MS. J Nat Prod. 2007;70:160–168. doi: 10.1021/np068034t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Deslippe RJ, Guo YJ. Toxicon. 2000;38:223–232. doi: 10.1016/s0041-0101(99)00147-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Spande TF, Jain P, Garraffo HM, Pannell LK, Yeh HJC, Daly JW, Fukumoto S, Imamura K, Tokuyama T, Torres JA, Snelling RR, Jones TH. J Nat Prod. 1999;62:5–21. doi: 10.1021/np980298v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Torres JA, Zottig VE, Co JE, Jones TH, Snelling RR. Sociobiology. 2001;37:579–583. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jones TH, Torres JA, Snelling RR, Spande TF. J Nat Prod. 1996;59:801–803. doi: 10.1021/np960350s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schröder F, Francke S, Francke W, Baumann H, Kaib M, Pasteels JM, Daloze D. Tetrahedron. 1996;52:13539–13546. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Böröczky K, Laatsch H, Wagner-Döbler I, Stritzke K, Schulz S. Chem Biodiv. 2006;3:622–634. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.200690065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Halmekoski J, Pekkala RM. Acta Pharm Fenn. 1977;86:209–214. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pouchert CE, editor. The Aldrich Library of FT-IR Spectra, Vapor Phase. Vol. 3. Aldrich Chemical Company; Milwaukee, WI: [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nakanishi K. Infrared Absorption Spectroscopy-Practical. Holden-Day; San Francisco: 1962. p. 19. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shin I, Lee M, Jung M, Lee W, Yoon J. J Org Chem. 2000;65:7667–7675. doi: 10.1021/jo0006573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Velusamy S, Punniyamurthy T. Org Lett. 2004;6:217–219. doi: 10.1021/ol036166x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Daly JW, Garraffo HM, Spande TF, Yeh HJC, Peltzer PM, Cacivio PM, Baldo JD, Faivovich J. Toxicon. 2008;52:858–870. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2008.08.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Halmekoski J, Tuisku L, Iija M. Acta Pharm Fenn. 1979;88:73–78. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Smith CR, Dolezal A, Eliyahu D, Holbrook CT, Gadau J. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2009;4:1–13. doi: 10.1101/pdb.emo125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Blum MS, Morel L, Fales HM. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1987;86B:251–252. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Brand JM, Duffield RM, MacConnell JG, Blum MS, Fales HM. Science. 1973;179:388–389. doi: 10.1126/science.179.4071.388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Boomsma JJ, Baer B, Heinze J. Annu Rev Entomol. 2005;50:395–420. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.50.071803.130416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Robertson HG, Villet M. J Nat Hist. 1989;23:767–773. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Briese DT. Insect Soc. 1983;30:308–316. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kenne M, Dejean A. Sociobiology. 1998;31:41–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Snelling RR. Sociobiology. 2001;37:511–525. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Noordijk J, Morssinkhof R, Boer P, Schaffers AP, Heijerman Th, Sykora KV. Insect Soc. 2008;55:266–273. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES