Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 3.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2010 Mar 3;132(8):2518–2519. doi: 10.1021/ja910361r

Development of an Activity Assay for Discovery of Inhibitors of Lipopolysaccharide Transport

Luisa S Gronenberg 1, Daniel Kahne 1,*
PMCID: PMC2846522  NIHMSID: NIHMS177158  PMID: 20136079

Abstract

The outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria contains an outer leaflet composed of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) that is transported to this location by a pathway that is essential for viability. It has been suggested that inhibitors of this pathway could be useful antibiotics. Herein we reconstitute the activity of the ATPase component (LptB) of the ABC transporter that initiates LPS transport and assembly. We developed a high throughput assay and screened a library of kinase inhibitors against LptB. We identified two classes of ATP-competitive inhibitors. These are the first inhibitors of the ATPase component of any bacterial ABC transporter. The small molecule inhibitors will be very useful tools for further biochemical studies of the proteins involved in lipopolysaccharide transport and assembly.


Antibiotic resistant Gram-negative infections are a serious health threat. Unlike Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative organisms have an outer membrane (OM) that restricts access to many antibiotics that might otherwise be useful. This membrane contains an outer leaflet composed of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which creates a hydrophilic barrier that prevents easy passage of small hydrophobic molecules (Figure 1).1 Because improper synthesis, transport or assembly creates a defective (leaky) OM, it has been suggested that inhibitors of LPS biogenesis could be useful antibiotics, either alone or in combination with known antibiotics. Indeed, inhibitors of LpxC, the enzyme that catalyzes the first committed step in LPS biosynthesis, have shown promise as antibacterial agents.2

Figure 1.

Figure 1

LPS biosynthesis, transport and assembly.

LPS is partially synthesized in the cytoplasm and is then flipped from the inner to the outer leaflet of the inner membrane (IM),3a where biosynthesis is completed by the ligation of O-antigen to the core oligosaccharide of LPS (Figure 1, left).3b,c The LPS is then transported to the outer leaflet of the outer membrane by seven recently discovered Lpt proteins, which are essential in most Gram-negative bacteria (Figure 1, right).4a–e Energy is required to initiate extraction from the IM of the LPS molecule, which contains five myristoyl (C14) and one lauroyl (C12) chains. The periplasmic space contains no ATP to drive membrane extraction; instead, an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter containing a cytoplasmic ATPase, LptB, as well as two transmembrane components, LptF and G, is proposed to perform this function. Although ABC transporters have received considerable attention as targets for cancer chemotherapy, bacterial ABC transporters have been largely overlooked as possible antibacterial targets. The purified LptBFG transporter was recently shown to exhibit ATPase activity, but this membrane protein complex is not suitable for high throughput screening.4f Here we reconstitute the activity of the soluble ATPase component, LptB, and develop a high throughput assay for activity. By screening a kinase inhibitor library we identified several ATP-competitive inhibitors. Targeting ATPase components of essential ABC transporters in bacteria may be a good strategy for antibiotic discovery.

LptB was overexpressed as a C-terminal 8-histidine fusion protein in Escherichia coli and purified over Ni-NTA resin (yield ~20 mg/L of culture) (Figure S1). To monitor activity, we adapted a continuous assay that couples ATP hydrolysis to NADH oxidation (Figure S2).5 Reactions were monitored by measuring the decrease in fluorescence intensity of NADH (λex= 340 nm, λem= 465 nm). ATPase activity was observed in the presence of Mg2+ or Mn2+; no reaction was observed with Zn2+, Ni2+ or Ca2+ (Figure S3). Rates were four- to five-fold higher for ATP hydrolysis compared with hydrolysis of GTP, CTP, or UTP (Figure 2A). To ensure that ATPase activity was due to LptB and not to a co-purifying contaminant, we expressed a mutant protein in which the predicted catalytic glutamate was changed to glutamine.6 The mutant protein, LptB-E163Q, had no activity in the assay (Figure S4).

Figure 2. Development of kinetic assay for LptB and its use to discover inhibitors.

Figure 2

(A) Analysis of nucleotide selectivity for LptB. (B) Rate of ATP hydrolysis with respect to ATP concentration. C) Two validated LptB inhibitors, 1 and 2, discovered in this screen. (Figure S4) For comparison IC50 values are shown for 3, AMP-PNP. The calculated Ki for 3, based on the IC50, is 25mM.8 (Figures S6,7)

To analyze the kinetic parameters of LptB, we measured the reaction rate over a range of ATP concentrations using optimized buffer conditions. Non-linear regression (GraphPad Prism) showed that the data fit an allosteric sigmoidal model better than a Michaelis-Menten model. kcat was found to be 6.2 ± 0.1 min−1, which is comparable to several other ABC transporter ATPases.6b The apparent Km (K′) was found to be 0.56 ± 0.04 mM, with a Hill coefficient of 1.5 ± 0.1. These data indicate that ATP binding to LptB is cooperative (Figure 2B), and suggest that LptB functions as a dimer, consistent with the reported LptBFG complex stoichiometry, 4f and with the known mechanisms of all other characterized ABC transporter ATPases. 6

To screen for small molecule inhibitors, we adapted the assay to a 384-well plate format. Reactions were initiated by the addition of ATP and fluorescence was read after 60 minutes. Inactive LptB-E163Q was used as a control for full inhibition (positive control). DMSO-treated LptB was used as a control for no inhibition (negative control). To eliminate false positives due to fluorescent library compounds, the plates were read after library transfer, but before the reaction was initiated by addition of ATP. The signal window of the assay, determined by calculating the Z′ factor for a plate containing only positive and negative controls, was 0.83 (Figure S5).7

We screened 244 compounds from two commercially available kinase inhibitor libraries, composed of mostly ATP-competitive inhibitors. Compounds belonging to two different structural classes were selected for further analysis (Figure 2C, 1 and 2). Both compounds were found to be competitive with respect to ATP, as expected based on the composition of the libraries. The inhibitor binding constants (Ki) are in the μM range. The compounds have no activity against a wild-type strain of E. coli; however, they have MICs consistent with their Ki values against a strain of E. coli with a leaky OM (Table S1). Likely, the lack of activity in the wild-type strain is related to poor OM penetration. Whether the observed antibiotic activity is due to inhibition of LptB is not yet known; there are other essential ATPases in E. coli, which could be in vivo targets of these compounds.

A key motivation for identifying small molecule inhibitors of ABC transporter ATPases is that better tools are needed for biochemical studies; non-hydrolyzable ATP analogs are poor inhibitors.6c In fact, a commercially available, non-hydrolyzable ATP analog, AMP-PNP (Figure 1C, 3), was three orders of magnitude less potent than the inhibitors (1, 2) reported here. We are currently working to identify inhibitors with improved potency based on the scaffolds identified. Crystals of LptB containing bound inhibitors would also facilitate structure-based design for improved specificity.

In eukaryotic systems, inhibition of ABC transporter dependent drug efflux pumps (e.g. P-glycoprotein) has been validated as an approach for cancer chemotherapy.9 In bacteria, drug efflux pumps have been considered as targets, but the clinically relevant pumps are not ABC transporters.10a However there are numerous ABC transporters that play important roles in cell envelope biogenesis.10b,c Inhibiting these transporters has enormous potential as a new antibiotic strategy.11 We have identified the first compounds that inhibit the ATPase component of a bacterial ABC transporter, one that is essential to viability. The approach of screening for inhibitors of important bacterial ATPases in ABC transporters could leverage a vast body of work for small molecule leads,12 some of which that have already been tested in man.13

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the NIH (A1081059), and an NSF Fellowship (to L.S.G.). Jonathan Swoboda and the staff at the ICCB at HMS assisted in screening the EMD Inhibitor Select kinase libraries (provided by Nathanael Gray). Shu Sin Chng prepared the LptB-His plasmid.

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available: LptB expression, purification and kinetic characterization, detailed assay condition and screening procedures, inhibitor characterization. The complete citation for Ref. 13a is also included. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org

References

  • 1.Nikaido H. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2003;67:593–656. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.67.4.593-656.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Onishi HR, Pelak BA, Gerckens LS, Silver LL, Kahan FM, Chen MH, Patchett AA, Galloway SM, Hyland SA, Anderson MS, Raetz CR. Science. 1996;274:980–2. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5289.980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.(a) Raetz CR, Whitfield C. Annu Rev Biochem. 2002;71:635–700. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.110601.135414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Samuel G, Reeves P. Carbohydr Res. 2003;338:2503–19. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2003.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Guo H, Yi W, Song JK, Wang PG. Curr Top Med Chem. 2008;8:141–51. doi: 10.2174/156802608783378873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.(a) Bos MP, Tefsen B, Geurtsen J, Tommassen J. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:9417–22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402340101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Wu T, McCandlish AC, Gronenberg LS, Chng SS, Silhavy TJ, Kahne D. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:11754–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604744103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Sperandeo P, Pozzi C, Deho G, Polissi A. Res Microbiol. 2006;157:547–58. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2005.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Sperandeo P, Cescutti R, Villa R, Di Benedetto C, Candia D, Deho G, Polissi A. J Bacteriol. 2007;189:244–53. doi: 10.1128/JB.01126-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Ruiz N, Gronenberg LS, Kahne D, Silhavy TJ. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:5537–42. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801196105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Narita S, Tokuda H. FEBS Lett. 2009;583:2160–4. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.05.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.(a) Kornberg A, Pricer WE., Jr J Biol Chem. 1951;193:481–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Lindsley JE. Methods Mol Biol. 2001;95:57–64. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-057-8:57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.(a) Davidson AL, Dassa E, Orelle C, Chen J. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2008;72:317–64. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00031-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Schneider E, Hunke S. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1998;22:1–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1998.tb00358.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Davidson AL, Chen J. Annu Rev Biochem. 2004;73:241–68. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang JH, Chung TD, Oldenburg KR. J Biomol Screen. 1999;4:67–73. doi: 10.1177/108705719900400206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ki for AMP-PNP was calculated from the experimentally determined IC50 as described in Copeland RA. Enzymes: A Practical Introduction to Structure, Mechanism, and Data Analysis. 2. WileyVCH; New York: 2000.
  • 9.Gergely Szakács G, Paterson JK, Ludwig JA, Booth-Genthe C, Gottesman MM. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006;5:219–34. doi: 10.1038/nrd1984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.(a) Li X, Nikaido H. Drugs. 2004;64:159–204. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200464020-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Zhou Z, White KA, Polissi A, Georgopoulos C, Raetz CR. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:12466–75. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.20.12466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Ito H, Ura A, Oyamada Y, Yoshida H, Yamagishi J, Narita S, Matsuyama S, Tokuda H. Microbiol Immunol. 2007;51:263–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2007.tb03906.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Swoboda JG, Meredith TC, Campbell J, Brown S, Suzuki T, Bollenbach T, Malhowski AJ, Kishony R, Gilmore MS, Walker S. ACS Chem Biol. 2009;4:875–83. doi: 10.1021/cb900151k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.(a) Knight ZA, Shokat KM. Chem Biol. 2005;12:621–37. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2005.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Zhang J, Yang PL, Gray NS. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:28–39. doi: 10.1038/nrc2559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.(a) Miller JR, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:1737–42. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811275106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Fischbach MA, Walsh CT. Science. 2009;325:1089–93. doi: 10.1126/science.1176667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001

RESOURCES