Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jan 22;202(4):373.e1–373.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.11.029

Prevalence, incidence and natural history of simple ovarian cysts among women over age 55 in a large cancer screening trial

Robert T Greenlee 1,*, Bruce Kessel 2, Craig R Williams 3, Thomas L Riley 4, Lawrence R Ragard 5, Patricia Hartge 6, Saundra S Buys 7, Edward E Partridge 8, Douglas J Reding 9
PMCID: PMC2847634  NIHMSID: NIHMS172433  PMID: 20096820

Abstract

Objective

To measure the occurrence and natural history of simple ovarian cysts in a cohort of older women.

Study Design

Simple cysts were ascertained among a cohort of 15,735 women from the intervention arm of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial, through 4 years of transvaginal ultrasound screening.

Results

Simple cysts were seen in 14% of women the first time their ovaries were visualized. The one-year incidence of new simple cysts was 8%. Among ovaries with one simple cyst at the first screen, 54% retained one simple cyst, and 32% had no cyst one year later. Simple cysts did not increase risk of subsequent invasive ovarian cancer.

Conclusions

Simple ovarian cysts are fairly common among post-menopausal women, and most appear stable or resolve by the next annual exam. These findings support recent recommendations to follow unilocular simple cysts in post-menopausal women without intervention.

Keywords: ovarian cancer, ovarian cysts, transvaginal ultrasound

INTRODUCTION

With frequent use of transvaginal ultrasound (TVU), clinicians are detecting many simple ovarian cysts among post-menopausal women. Because the natural history of simple ovarian cysts is not fully understood, the proper management of incidental simple cysts in post-menopausal women has been uncertain.1 Aggressive surgical approaches for simple cyst management have given way to recommendations for careful monitoring,25 and some have raised the question of whether simple cysts need to be monitored at all.1 We evaluated the prevalence, incidence, and natural history of simple cysts within a cohort of mostly post-menopausal women receiving serial TVU examinations in the intervention arm of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.6

METHODS

Prorok, et al. have previously described the design and methods of PLCO6, which is the setting and source population for this observational cohort analysis. Briefly, PLCO is a prospective evaluation of whether screening with a posterioranterior chest x-ray, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and CA-125 plus transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) can reduce mortality for lung, colon and ovarian cancers respectively in women. Comparable questions are being investigated for lung, colon, and prostate cancer among men. Women were eligible if they were between ages 55 and 74, and had no previous lung, colon or ovarian cancer diagnosis. Women receiving cancer treatment or participating in another screening or prevention trial were not eligible. Women who had undergone prior oophorectomy were excluded from ovarian cancer screening in the trial.

Recruitment occurred from November 1993 to July 2001. Women were randomly assigned either to the intervention or control arm after stratification by age, gender, and Screening Center (see appendix). Participants responded to a self-administered general risk factor questionnaire at entry.7 Ovarian cancer screening in PLCO included a CA-125 blood test and TVU at baseline, an annual TVU for three additional years, and annual CA-125 tests for five years beyond baseline.6 For TVU screening, qualified sonographers used a 5 to 7.5 MHz transvaginal probe to measure each ovary and describe any observed abnormalities. The examiner spent at least five minutes searching for each ovary, although the examiner could end the search if the iliac vessels were visualized and the ovaries were not observable. Ovaries were measured along major and minor axes of both transverse and longitudinal planes, and the prolate ellipsoid formula (width × height × thickness × 0.523) was used to calculate the volume of each ovary and/or cyst. Quality assurance procedures on a sample of participants included either repeating the screening examination, independent observation of the exam, or independent review of TVU films at a later time.

In the trial, the TVU screening examination was considered positive (abnormal and suspicious for ovarian cancer) when findings included: 1) ovarian volume greater than 10 cubic cm; 2) cyst volume greater than 10 cubic cm; 3) any solid area or papillary projection extending into the cavity of a cystic ovarian tumor of any size; or, 4) any mixed (solid/cystic) component within a cystic ovarian tumor. As part of the trial protocol, women with positive screening exams were referred to regular medical care for follow-up investigation. Ovarian cysts with volume less than 10 cubic cm and no solid areas, septae, or papillary projections noted in the cyst cavity, were not considered a positive screening exam in the trial. These simple cysts are, however, the subject of this cohort analysis. Ovarian cancers were ascertained in PLCO through review of medical records and pathology reports following a positive screen or a report of cancer on annual study surveys.6

Statistical Analysis

This analysis is based on the subset of intervention arm women with both ovaries visualized one or more times during TVU screenings. As in a previous PLCO report, women were classified by the most serious abnormality present.8 Prevalence was the proportion of women having a simple cyst discovered at the screening in which both ovaries were visualized for the first time (prevalent cyst). Most of these were discovered during the baseline screen, but for some women, the first informative screen was in a later round. A one-year incidence rate was the proportion of women who developed a new simple cyst in their second screen with visualized ovaries, after no cysts had been discovered one year before in their first screen with visualized ovaries (incident cyst).

Descriptive evaluation of the natural history of simple cysts was performed by examining the status of all ovaries visualized in 2 consecutive study years (baseline to year 1, year 1 to year 2, or year 2 to year 3). For this particular analysis, each ovary was counted as a separate unit of evaluation. One year change in CA125 levels were compared, in an analysis of variance, between women with simple cysts who had more extensive findings (increased number or complexity) one year later and those who did not. Chi-square or Fisher's exact test, and multivariable logistic regression, were used to evaluate the potential association between detection of simple cysts and subsequent discovery of invasive ovarian cancer, through year 7 after baseline.

Chi-square analysis evaluated possible correlates of simple ovarian cyst occurrence, comparing women with prevalent or incident simple cysts to women without detected cysts at the corresponding screen. The primary objective of this analysis was to evaluate whether known or potential ovarian cancer risk factors correlate with simple cyst occurrence, based on the approach of Hartge.8 Potential predictors in this analysis included age, education, smoking status, number of sisters, first degree family history of ovarian cancer and of breast cancer, number of pregnancies, parity, number of miscarriages, use and duration of oral contraceptives, age at first pregnancy, use of hormone replacement, regular use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or aspirin, age at menarche, age at menopause, previous gynecologic surgery, body mass index, history of benign ovarian tumors or cysts, and history of infertility. Multivariable logistic regression models contained factors with P-values less than or equal to 0.2 from the chi-square analyses. All multivariable models also adjusted for race and Screening Center. For dichotomous variables, the ‘no’ category served as the referent, and for categorical variables, the referent was the most common category. P-values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The study was approved by the Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation Institutional Review Board.

RESULTS

The trial enrolled 78,237 women and randomized 39,115 to the screening arm (Table 1). Of 4895 screening arm women not eligible for TVU, 4892 had prior oophorectomy, two had died, and one had ovarian cancer prior to the baseline screen. Of 34,220 eligible women, 30,389 (89%) received at least one exam. A total of 15,735 women had both ovaries visualized one or more times during the study. About two-thirds of these women were enrolled between ages 55 and 64, 89% reported their race as Caucasian, and 94% indicated they had received at least a high school diploma (Table 2).

Table 1.

Identification of study populations for simple cyst prevalence and incidence analyses from the intervention arm of the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial

39115 women randomized to the screening arm
  4895 not eligible for TVU
  3831 not compliant with TVU
    239 with inadequate TVU(s)
30150 received at least one adequate TVU
  6610 with ovaries never visualized
  7805 at most one ovary visualized
15735 with a qualifying TVU for prevalence estimation*
  3097 with cysts/solid masses on prevalence TVU
  7137 other reasons for no TVU for incidence estimation**
5501 with a qualifying TVU for incidence estimation***
*

prevalence TVU = first screen with both ovaries visualized

**

no longer eligible, not compliant, inadequate screen, both ovaries not visualized, or prevalence TVU occurred during last screening round (year 3)

***

incidence TVU = second exam with both ovaries visualized, one year after prevalence exam, no cysts on prevalence exam

Table 2.

Select Characteristics of Simple Ovarian Cyst Study Cohort*

Number
%
Total Study Population 15735 100.0
Age
55–59 5679 36.1
60–64 4994 31.7
65–69 3260 20.7
70–74 1802 11.5
Race/Ethnicity
White 14068 89.4
Black 508 3.2
Hispanic 218 1.4
Asian 717 4.6
Pacific Islander 84 0.5
American Indian 34 0.2
Missing 106 0.7
Education
<12 years 796 5.1
12 yrs/Completed High School 6204 39.4
Some College 3526 22.4
College Graduate 2602 16.5
Post Graduate 2492 15.8
Missing 115 0.7
Cigarette Use
Never Smoked 8876 56.4
Current Smoker 1348 8.6
Former Smoker 5406 34.4
Missing 105 0.7
First Degree Family History of Breast Cancer
No 12613 80.2
Yes 2238 14.2
Unknown 541 3.4
Missing 343 2.2
Total Years of Oral Contraceptive use
0 7178 45.6
<1 2214 14.1
2–3 1731 11.0
4–5 1174 7.5
6–9 1421 9.0
10+ 1888 12.0
Missing 129 0.8
Age at First Pregnancy
Never pregnant 1105 7.0
less than 20 3308 21.0
20–24 7313 46.5
25–29 2958 18.8
30+ 907 5.8
Missing 144 0.9
Number of Pregnancies
Never pregnant 1105 7.0
1 892 5.7
2 2800 17.8
3–4 6481 41.2
5–9 4046 25.7
10+ 277 1.8
Missing 134 0.9
Hormone Replacement
No 5437 34.6
Yes 10131 64.4
Don't Know 52 0.3
Missing 115 0.7
Age at Menopause
<40 1576 10.0
40–44 1730 11.0
45–49 3536 22.5
50–54 6579 41.8
55+ 2072 13.2
Missing 242 1.5
Previous Gynecologic Surgery
No 9406 59.8
Yes 6159 39.1
Don't Know 32 0.2
Missing 138 0.9
History of Benign Ovarian Tumors or Cysts
No 14101 89.6
Yes 1236 7.9
Missing 398 2.5
Use of NSAIDs or aspirin
No 6798 43.2
Yes 8769 55.7
Missing 168 1.1
History of Infertility
No 13374 85.0
Yes 2218 14.1
Missing 143 0.9

NSAID - Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

*

PLCO Trial women in intervention arm with both ovaries visualized by transvaginal ultrasound one or more times from baseline (T0) through the Year 3 (T3) screening

Prevalence and Incidence of Simple Cysts

Among the 15,735 women, 2,217 (14.1%) had one or more simple cysts detected at their first fully visualized TVU screening (Table 3). In stratified analysis, prevalence varied by age (p=0.001), with simple cyst detection slightly more common for women ages 55–59 (16%) than for women in older age groups (13%). Among women without a cyst of any kind on their first fully visualized screen, the rate of having a new simple cyst at the second screen one year later was 8.3% (Table 4). The incidence rate of new cyst development did not vary systematically with age, ranging across age groups from 7–9% (p=0.20). When calculating a simple cyst incidence rate for each individual screening year of the trial, the results were 8.4% at year 1 after baseline, 7.4% from year 1 to year 2, and 7.3% from year 2 to year 3.

Table 3.

Simple Ovarian Cyst Prevalence and Multivariable Modeling Results

Prevalent
Simple Cysts
Adjusted Association*
# Women
Rate (%)
Odds Ratio
95% CI
Overall 2217 14.1
Age
55–59 884 15.6 ref.
60–64 658 13.2 0.83 (0.73, 0.94)
65–69 434 13.3 0.97 (0.84, 1.12)
70–74 241 13.4 1.01 (0.84, 1.22)
Education
<12 years 94 11.8 0.85 (0.66, 1.09)
12 yrs/Completed High School 842 13.6 ref.
Some College 515 14.6 1.11 (0.97, 1.26)
College Graduate 411 15.8 1.32 (1.14, 1.53)
Post Graduate 338 13.6 1.19 (1.02, 1.40)
Missing 17 14.8 NA
Cigarette Use
Never Smoked 1248 14.1 ref.
Current Smoker 155 11.5 0.75 (0.61, 0.91)
Former Smoker 797 14.7 1.04 (0.93, 1.15)
Missing 17 16.2 NA
First Degree Family History of Breast Cancer
No 1739 13.8 ref.
Yes 342 15.3 1.12 (0.98, 1.28)
Unknown 81 15.0 NA
Missing 55 16.0 NA
Total Years of Oral Contraceptive Use
0 946 13.2 ref.
<1 337 15.2 1.02 (0.88, 1.18)
2–3 254 14.7 0.95 (0.80, 1.13)
4–5 179 15.2 0.94 (0.77, 1.14)
6–9 212 14.9 0.94 (0.78, 1.13)
10+ 266 14.1 0.97 (0.83, 1.15)
Missing 23 17.8 NA
Age at First Pregnancy
Never pregnant 135 12.2 0.82 (0.60, 1.12)
less than 20 516 15.6 1.04 (0.91, 1.19)
20–24 1078 14.7 ref.
25–29 366 12.4 0.85 (0.74, 0.98)
30+ 102 11.2 0.71 (0.55, 0.91)
Missing 20 13.9 NA
Number of Pregnancies
Never pregnant 135 12.2 NA
1 120 13.5 1.25 (0.99, 1.58)
2 359 12.8 0.97 (0.84, 1.12)
3–4 938 14.5 ref.
53–9 612 15.1 0.97 (0.86, 1.09)
10+ 34 12.2 0.72 (0.49, 1.06)
Missing 19 14.2 NA
Hormone Replacement
No 682 12.5 ref.
Yes 1512 14.9 1.09 (0.98, 1.22)
Don't Know 6 11.5 NA
Missing 17 14.8 NA
Age at Menopause
<40 390 24.7 2.09 (1.77, 2.46)
40–44 272 15.7 1.26 (1.07, 1.49)
45–49 410 11.6 0.93 (0.82, 1.07)
50–54 786 11.9 ref.
55+ 313 15.1 1.24 (1.07, 1.44)
Missing 46 19.0 NA
Previous Gynecologic Surgery
No 1070 11.4 ref.
Yes 1124 18.2 1.48 (1.33, 1.66)
Don't Know 1 3.1 NA
Missing 22 15.9 NA
History of Benign Ovarian Tumors or Cysts
No 1934 13.7 ref.
Yes 220 17.8 1.29 (1.09, 1.52)
Missing 63 15.8 NA
Use of NSAIDs or aspirin
No 920 13.5 ref.
Yes 1268 14.5 1.00 (0.91, 1.10)
Missing 29 17.3 NA
History of Infertility
No 1862 13.9 ref.
Yes 335 15.1 0.95 (0.69, 1.30)
Missing 20 14.0 NA
*

Model adjusts for all factors shown, plus race and screening center

NSAID - Non Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug

ref. - Referent Category

NA - Not Available

Table 4.

One Year Incidence of Simple Ovarian Cysts and Multivariable Modeling Results

Incident
Simple Cysts
Adjusted Association*
Count
Rate (%)
Odds Ratio
95% CI
Overall 459 8.3
Age
55–59 179 8.7 ref.
60–64 141 7.9 0.98 (0.76, 1.27)
65–69 102 9.4 1.26 (0.93, 1.78)
70–74 37 6.6 0.91 (0.60, 1.39)
Education
<12 years 21 7.5 0.99 (0.60, 1.64)
12 yrs/Completed High School 167 7.4 ref.
Some College 116 10.0 1.36 (1.03, 1.79)
College Graduate 75 8.4 1.29 (0.94, 1.78)
Post Graduate 77 8.8 1.35 (0.98, 1.88)
Missing 3 11.1 NA
Cigarette Use
Never Smoked 230 7.4 ref.
Current Smoker 49 9.7 1.26 (0.88, 1.79)
Former Smoker 177 9.5 1.25 (1.00, 1.56)
Missing 3 11.5 NA
First Degree Family History of Breast Cancer
No 352 7.9 ref.
Yes 75 9.6 1.18 (0.89, 1.55)
Unknown 22 12.2 NA
Missing 10 11.2 NA
Ever Used Oral Contraceptives
No 198 7.8 ref.
Yes 258 8.8 1.07 (0.85, 1.34)
Missing 3 10.3 NA
Age at First Pregnancy
Never pregnant 42 10.1 1.27 (0.86, 1.88)
less than 20 97 8.4 1.01 (0.77, 1.33)
20–24 220 8.8 ref.
25–29 71 6.7 0.85 (0.62, 1.15)
30+ 25 7.6 1.03 (0.65, 1.64)
Missing 4 10.5 NA
Age at Menopause
<40 56 14.1 1.92 (1.32, 2.80)
40–44 46 9.2 1.35 (0.94, 1.95)
45–49 109 8.6 1.27 (0.97, 1.66)
50–54 168 6.7 ref.
55+ 68 9.1 1.43 (1.05, 1.95)
Missing 12 15.8 NA
Previous Gynecologic Surgery
No 255 7.2 ref.
Yes 201 10.6 1.52 (1.21, 1.92)
Don't Know 0 0.0 NA
Missing 3 8.3 NA
History of Benign Ovarian Tumors or Cysts
No 414 8.2 ref.
Yes 39 10.2 1.25 (0.86, 1.82)
Missing 6 6.0 NA
*

Model adjusts for all factors shown, plus race and screening center

ref. - Referent Category

NA - Not Available

Natural History of Simple Cysts

Among ovaries with a simple cyst at the first visualized screen, 79% had just one cyst, while 15% had two, and 7% had 3 or more. For ovaries with a single simple cyst, 54% retained a single simple cyst in the following year, while 32% no longer had a cyst present (Table 5). Regression to having no cysts at all was less common for ovaries containing 2 or more cysts (23%), although more than half of the time, ovaries with multiple simple cysts had a reduced number of simple cysts the following year.

Table 5.

One year change in Ovary* status

Ovary Status at Screening One Year Later
No
Cyst
1 Simple
Cyst
2 Simple
Cysts
3 or more Simple
Cysts
Solid
Mass
Complex
Cyst
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %






Ovary Status at Screening Total
No Cyst 34745 32264 92.9 1745 5.0 255 0.7 95 0.3 138 0.4 248 0.7
1 Simple Cyst 4653 1487 32.0 2533 54.4 276 5.9 89 1.9 23 0.5 245 5.3
2 Simple Cysts 869 203 23.4 242 27.8 268 30.8 93 10.7 1 0.1 62 7.1
3 or more Simple Cysts 400 92 23.0 62 15.5 71 17.8 132 33.0 4 1.0 39 9.8
40667
*

Ovaries visualized by transvaginal ultrasound in two consecutive screening years, showing no cysts or only simple cysts in the former year (n=40,667).

About 8% of ovaries with a single simple cyst presented the following year with multiple simple cysts, and 6% had developed more complex cysts or solid masses. Ovaries that contained multiple simple cysts were somewhat more likely than ovaries with just one simple cyst to present with complex cysts or solid masses the following year (7% for 2 simple cysts, 11% for 3+ simple cysts). Development of complex cysts or solid masses over the course of a year was rare among ovaries starting with no cyst at all (1%). Average CA-125 level changes over the one-year period were not associated with an increase in the number of simple cysts or progression from simple to more complex cysts.

Women whose ultrasound showed one or more simple cysts at their first fully visualized screening were not at significantly increased risk of subsequently developing invasive ovarian cancer (9 of 2217, or 0.41%) compared to their counterparts with no cysts (55 of 12638, or 0.44%), p=0.85. Women with a new simple cyst at their second fully visualized screening had the same occurrence of subsequent invasive ovarian cancer (1 of 459, or 0.22%) as did women who had no simple cysts on two consecutive screens (11 of 4939, or 0.22%), p>0.99. Findings did not change upon multivariable analysis adjusting for ovarian cancer risk factors: OR (95% CI) comparing those with prevalent cysts to those without, 0.84 (0.41–1.73); comparing those with incident cysts to those without, 0.95 (0.12–7.46).

Potential Correlates of Simple Cysts

In multivariable analysis, a modestly reduced risk of simple cysts at the prevalence screen was found in women age 60–64 (OR compared to women age 55–59 0.83, 0.73–0.94), current smokers (OR compared to never smokers 0.75, 0.61–0.91), and women with first pregnancy at age 25–29 (OR 0.85) or age 30+ (OR 0.71). Women with a college (OR 1.32, 1.14–1.53) or post graduate education (OR 1.19, 1.02–1.40) had an elevated odds of a prevalent simple cyst, as did women with previous history of benign ovarian cysts (OR 1.29, 1.09–1.52) and women with previous gynecologic surgery (OR 1.48, 1.33, 1.66). Menopause before age 40 was strongly associated with elevated odds of a simple cyst compared to women whose last menstruation was between ages 50 and 54 (OR 2.09, 1.77–2.46). Current and former smokers were each at about 25% increased risk of having an ovarian cyst at the incidence screen, although this was of borderline significance only for former smokers (OR 1.25, 1.00–1.56). Associations with menopause and gynecologic surgery were similar to those observed for simple cyst prevalence. There was a suggestion that women with post-high school education had a higher incidence, but this was only significant among women with some college (OR 1.36, 1.03–1.79).

COMMENT

In our analysis of four serial TVU examinations within a large cancer screening trial of mostly post-menopausal women, we determined that simple ovarian cysts are a common incidental finding upon ultrasonography. Increases over time in the number or complexity of cysts were infrequent, and many cysts fully resolved between annual exams. Greater numbers of simple cysts correlated with subsequent development of complex cysts, but simple cysts were not associated with development of ovarian cancer, an outcome actively ascertained in the PLCO trial.

Prevalence of simple cysts in this analysis (14%), based on a participant's first screening with fully visualized ovaries, is just slightly lower than previous baseline results from PLCO (15.7%).8 These values fall within, but near the high end, of the range of prevalence estimates from the published literature. Much of the knowledge gained about the occurrence and course of simple ovarian cysts in post-menopausal women comes from smaller case series.910 Oyelese11 summarized the results of 5 studies from the late 1980s and 1990s,10, 1215 with numbers of post-menopausal women examined ranging from 149 to 7705, and simple cyst prevalence ranging from 3.3 to 14.8%. Levine found 17% of 184 women had simple adnexal cysts following first examination with transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasound.16 More recently, in a large ovarian cancer screening study at the University of Kentucky, 18% of 15,106 women had unilocular ovarian cysts discovered during the course of the screening program.17

Estimates of the incidence of simple ovarian cysts are lacking in the published literature. A major strength of the present study was the use of serial TVU examinations to assess the development of new cysts among women whose ovaries had been cyst-free in previous screenings. The incidence of simple cysts was about 8% per year and remained fairly constant over the course of the trial, even among older women in the study. The expectation of continued simple cyst detection even after multiple clear screens, and even as women approach their late 70s, reinforces the importance of a sound strategy for managing simple ovarian cysts when incorporating repeated TVU examinations in clinical practice.

Serial screenings at standard intervals also provided insight into the natural history of simple ovarian cysts. One third of ovaries with simple cysts were cyst-free the next year. Even ovaries with 3 or more simple cysts were cyst-free one year later 25% of the time. Previous studies report resolution rates ranging upward from 23%. The proportion of simple cysts resolving spontaneously over an average of 4.6 years of followup in the University of Kentucky trial was 83%.18 The most common outcome for ovaries with simple cysts in the PLCO study a year later was to have the same number of simple cysts. Finding 54% of simple cysts persisting a year later is comparable to the 49% reported among 134 women followed for a mean of 3 years1 and the 56% persistence over 2 years reported by Castillo19 among 104 women. In our study, only 6% of ovaries progressed from having a single simple cyst to having a more complex cyst a year later, although this was somewhat more common within ovaries with multiple simple cysts. In the University of Kentucky trial, over 22% of cysts developed septae or solid areas upon followup.17

Surgical intervention for abnormal findings in a post-menopausal ovary had been the standard of care for decades.20,21 In the 1980s, the necessity for a surgical approach was questioned based on small study results. A recent evidence-based report was not able to draw definitive conclusions on the sensitivity and specificity of periodic monitoring of simple cysts for cancer detection, but suggested that prolonged followup of simple cysts with interval TVU was likely a safe approach.22 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists subsequently stated that simple cysts found on ultrasound ‘may be safely followed without intervention, even in post-menopausal women’.4 Our study results reinforce the belief that simple cysts are not likely cancer precursors, nor markers of increased risk, and can be managed conservatively. In our study, women with and without simple cysts developed invasive ovarian cancer at an equivalent rate after nearly 8 years of followup. These findings are also consistent with the University of Kentucky report, where only 10 ovarian cancers were detected among 2,700 women with simple cysts after 6 years on average, and none developed among women with an isolated simple cyst.17 Also, while potential correlates of prevalent simple cysts were identified in our study, including higher risk among women that were younger, well-educated, and had early menopause, traditional ovarian cancer risk factors (increasing age, family history of breast or ovarian cancer, nulliparity, infertility, etc.) were not associated with simple cysts, reinforcing a previous baseline report.8

It is a limitation that results were restricted to women with both ovaries visualized during TVU screening. Only 52% of screened women had both ovaries visualized, and occurrence rates of simple cysts may not be the same in women whose ovaries were not visualized. By incorporating simple cysts observed among the 26% of women with only one ovary visualized, and assuming the remaining 22% of women with ovaries never visualized were all cyst free, a lower bound of 11% can be placed on the prevalence among all screened women in the trial. Some ‘persistent’ cysts may reflect cyst resolution and replacement in the same ovary. In a previous study, half of simple cysts resolved within 60 days, and in another, two-thirds of resolving cysts did so within 3 months, suggesting resolution and replacement may have been occurring in some ovaries during the year between screens.15 Also, data for this study do not clearly distinguish whether a complex cyst found following a simple cyst on a previous screen represents morphological progression or the independent appearance of a complex cyst in the same ovary. PLCO quality assessment results do indicate TVU examinations had reasonably good reproducibility. If no cysts were visualized on the TVU, 99% of the time no cysts were seen on the quality assurance examination. If the initial examiner saw a simple cyst it was seen 84% of the time on the quality assurance examination. Finally, the PLCO trial protocol did not include systematic followup of the care received in response to the detection of simple cysts, since simple cysts were not considered positive screens. Therefore we do not have useful data on simple cyst surgeries or pathological interpretation of simple cyst tissue.

In summary, TVU data from participants in a large cancer screening trial confirm that simple ovarian cysts are common incidental findings among women over age 55 upon transvaginal ultrasonography, and remain common after several screening rounds and as women age. Simple cysts frequently resolve or persist without progression. Women with simple ovarian cysts do not appear to be at increased risk of developing invasive ovarian cancer. These findings support recent recommendations to follow unilocular simple cysts in post-menopausal women without intervention.4

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript were supported by grants to participating institutions from the National Cancer Institute, e.g., #N01-CN-25518 to Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation.

Thanks to the PLCO ovarian cancer subcommittee, especially Phil Prorok of the National Cancer Institute for his insightful comments, and Jian-Lun Xu of the National Cancer Institute and John Commins of IMS Inc. for project assistance. Thanks to Deb Multerer of the Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation for assistance with manuscript preparation.

ABBREVIATION LIST

NSAID

Non-Steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug

PLCO

Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial

TVU

Transvaginal Ultrasound

APPENDIX

PLCO Screening Centers and their locations include:

  • University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado

  • Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC

  • Pacific Health Research Institute, Honolulu, Hawaii

  • Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan

  • University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota

  • Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri

  • University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

  • University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah

  • Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield,Wisconsin

  • University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama

Footnotes

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Preliminary results of this study were presented in abstract form at the 2008 annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, May 31-June 3, 2008, in Chicago, IL.

Contributor Information

Robert T. Greenlee, Epidemiology Research Center, Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, 1000 North Oak Ave., Mailstop ML2, Marshfield, WI 54449, Phone: 715 389-3537, FAX: 715 389-3880, greenlee.robert@mcrf.mfldclin.edu

Bruce Kessel, Pacific Health Research Institute; John A Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii

Craig R. Williams, Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD

Thomas L. Riley, Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD

Lawrence R. Ragard, Westat, Rockville, MD

Patricia Hartge, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD

Saundra S. Buys, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT

Edward E. Partridge, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

Douglas J. Reding, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI

REFERENCES

  • 1.Valentin L, Akrawi D. The natural history of adnexal cysts incidentally detected at transvaginal ultrasound examination in postmenopausal women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;20(2):174–180. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00709.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nardo LG, Kroon ND, Reginald PW. Persistent unilocular ovarian cysts in a general population of postmenopausal women: Is there a place for expectant management? Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(3):589–593. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00663-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.McDondald JM, Modessit SC. The incidental postmenopausal adnexal mass. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;49(3):506–516. doi: 10.1097/00003081-200609000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Management of adnexal masses. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 83. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(1):201–214. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000263913.92942.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Parsons A. Whither the simple ovarian cyst in postmenopausal women? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;20(2):112–116. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00783.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Prorok PC, Andriole GL, Bresalier R, et al. Design of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. Control Clin Trials. 2000;21(6S):273–309. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(00)00098-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Buys SS, Partridge E, Greene MH, et al. Ovarian Cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial: Findings from the initial screen of a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(6):1630–1639. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hartge P, Hayes R, Reding D, et al. Complex ovarian cysts in postmenopausal women are not associated with ovarian cancer risk factors: Preliminary data from the Prostate, Lung, Colon, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial. Am J Obst Gynecol. 2000;183(5):1232–1237. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.107401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kroon E, Andolf E. Diagnosis and follow-up of simple ovarian cysts detected by ultrasound in postmenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85(2):211–214. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(94)00366-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Conway C, Zalud I, Dilena M, et al. Simple Cyst in the Postmenopausal Patient: Detection and Management. J Ultrasound Med. 1998;17(6):369–372. doi: 10.7863/jum.1998.17.6.369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Oyelese Y, Kueck AD, Barter JF, Zalud I. Asymptomatic Postmenopausal Simple Ovarian Cyst. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2002;57(12):803–809. doi: 10.1097/00006254-200212000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Andolf E, Jorrgensen C. Simple adnexal cysts diagnosed by ultrasound in post-menopausal women. J Clin Ultrasound. 1988;16(5):301–303. doi: 10.1002/jcu.1870160504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wolf SI, Gosink BB, Feldesman MR, et al. Prevalence of simple adenxal cysts in postmenopausal women. Radiology. 1991;180(1):65–71. doi: 10.1148/radiology.180.1.2052725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Aubert JM, Rombaut C, Argacha P, Romero F, Leira J, Gomez-Bolea F. Simple adnexal cysts in postmenopausal women: conservative management. Maturitas. 1998;30(1):51–54. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5122(98)00038-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bailey CL, Ueland FR, Land GL, et al. The malignant potential of small cystic ovarian tumors in women over 50 years of age. Gynecol Oncol. 1998;69(1):3–7. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1998.4965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Levine D, Gosink BB, Wolf SI, Feldesman MR, Pretorious DH. Simple adnexal cysts: the natural history in postmenopausal women. Radiology. 1992;184(3):653–659. doi: 10.1148/radiology.184.3.1509047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Modesitt SC, Pavlik EJ, Ueland FR, DePriest PD, Kryscio RJ, van Nagell JR., Jr Risk of Malignancy in unilocular ovarian cystic tumors less than 10 centimeters in diameter. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(3):594–599. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00670-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Van Nagell JR, Jr, DePriest PD, Ueland FR, et al. Ovarian cancer screening with annual transvaginal sonography: Findings of 25,000 women screened. Cancer. 2007;109(9):1887–1896. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Castillo G, Alcazar JL, Jurado M. Natural history of sonographicalliy detected simple unilocular adnexal cysts in asymptomatic post-menopausal women. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;92(3):965–969. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.11.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Barber HR. Ovarian Cancer: diagnosis and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;150(8):910–916. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(84)90380-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.DiSaia PJ, Creasman WT. Clinical Gyencologic Oncology. Fourth Edition. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby Year Book; 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Myers ER, Bastian LA, Havrilesky LJ, et al. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 130 (Prepared by the Duke Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290–02–0025.) AHRQ Publication No. 06-E004. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2006. Feb, [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES