Skip to main content
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine logoLink to International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
. 2010 Jan 8;3(1):33–40.

Integration of ER stress, oxidative stress and the inflammatory response in health and disease

Kezhong Zhang 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC2848304  PMID: 20369038

Abstract

There has been much effort to define the molecular basis by which pathophysiological stimuli initiate and/or propagate the inflammatory response. Recent research endeavors on stress response from a cellular organelle called the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) shed new light on the understating of the molecular basis of the inflammatory response and its interaction with other intracellular stress signaling pathways. As a protein folding compartment and dynamic calcium store, the ER plays major roles in sensing cellular stress and mediating highly-specific signaling pathways termed Unfolded Protein Response (UPR). The UPR signaling emanating from the ER has been identified as one of the avenues leading to the inflammatory response. The integration of ER stress, oxidative stress, and the inflammatory response is critical to the pathogenesis of a variety of diseases. In this brief review, we discuss some representative evidence for the integration of ER stress, oxidative stress, and inflammation in health and disease.

Keywords: ER stress, oxidative stress, inflammation, unfolded protein response, metabolic factors, inflammatory disease

Introduction

In eukaryotic cells, the ER is an organelle responsible for folding and assembly of membrane and secreted proteins, synthesis of lipids and sterols, and storage of free calcium [1, 2]. As a protein folding compartment, the ER provides a unique oxidizing environment in which molecular chaperones and folding enzymes facilitate and promote protein post-translational modification, folding, and oligomerization [1]. The ER has evolved a high-fidelity quality control system to ensure that only correctly folded proteins are transported to the Golgi compartment and then delivered to the extracellular environment. However, physiological states that increase protein-folding demand, or stimuli that disrupt protein folding reactions, create an imbalance between the protein-folding load and the capacity of the ER. This can cause the accumulation of unfolded or misfolded proteins in the ER lumen - the condition referred to “ER stress” [2-7]. To deal with the accumulation of unfolded or misfolded protein in the ER, the cells activate a group of signal transduction pathways collectively termed Unfolded Protein Response (UPR) to alter transcriptional and translational programs. In mammalian cells, the basic UPR pathways are mediated through three ER-transmembrane protein factors, including IRE1α (inositol-requiring 1 alpha), PERK (double -strand RNA-activated protein kinase-like ER kinase), and ATF6 (activating transcription factor 6). IRE1α is a protein kinase and endoribonuclease that can splice the mRNA encoding a basic leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factor XBP1 under the ER stress, leading to expression of the activated form of XBP1 [6, 8, 9]. The IRE1α/XBP1 arm of the UPR facilitates cell adaptation to ER stress by activating expression of a group of genes that are required for protein refolding, secretion, and degradation of misfolded proteins [10]. PERK is a protein kinase that phosphorylates alpha-subunit of eukaryotic translation initiation factor (elF2α), leading to translational attenuation in general [11, 12]. The translational attenuation can reduce the workload of the ER by preventing production of newly-synthesized proteins. ATF6 is a bZIP transcription factor of CREB/ATF family that is activated through a regulated-intramembrane proteolysis (RIP) under ER stress [13]. Activated ATF6 activates expression of UPR target genes encoding ER chaperones and folding enzymes to help protein folding, secretion, and degradation [14]. The initial phase of the UPR is to facilitate the cell adaption to ER stress. However, if the attempt to recover from ER stress fails or the ER stress gets prolonged, the UPR will induce cell death programs to eliminate the stressed cells [15].

In recent years, the scope and consequence of ER stress and the UPR have been significantly expanded. A growing body of evidence suggests that ER stress, oxidative stress, and the inflammatory response are cross-linked and that limiting of either one will affect the others [7, 16]. Inflammation can be triggered by chronic excess of metabolic factors, such as cytokines, hormones, cholesterol, lipid, and glucose. Interestingly, in many physiological or pathological systems, those metabolic factors can also trigger ER stress and oxidative stress, which can further disrupt metabolic function, leading to more inflammation. Such vicious cycles could be accounted for many pathophysiological events leading to metabolic deterioration in specialized cell types, such as macrophage, adipocytes, and pancreatic β-cells [7]. Importantly, intracellular calcium signals and free radicals, such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO), are key messengers for the interaction between ER stress, oxidative stress, and inflammation. In these interactive signal transduction processes, the functions of the ER and mitochondria are closely linked. These two organelles build up a dynamic network where they generate calcium signals and ROS to stimulate ER stress, oxidative stress, and inflammation (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Crosstalk between ER stress, oxidative stress, and the inflammatory response. Many physiologic or pathologic conditions can stimulate the production of ROS. ROS can target ER-based calcium channels and chaperones, leading to release of calcium from the ER to the cytosol. Increased cytosolic calcium can stimulate mitochondria metabolism to produce more ROS. Mitochondrial ROS can further accentuate calcium release from the ER, leading to the accumulation of a toxic level of ROS. Meanwhile, perturbation of ER calcium homeostasis can disrupt protein folding process, causing ER stress and the activation of the UPR. The UPR can subsequently promote the inflammatory response, anti-oxidative stress response, apoptosis, and other stress response pathways.

Metabolic factors that trigger ER stress, oxidative stress, and the inflammatory response

Cholesterol

Cholesterol is an essential nutrient component for life but also associated with inflammation and the pathogenesis of metabolic disease if it is in pathological excess. Cholesterol, either synthesized in the ER or derived from the diet, is an essential component required to build and maintain all cell membranes. The cholesterol metabolism is closely associated with the ER function. This is well illustrated by the macrophage loaded by excessive unesterified, or “free” cholesterol [17, 18]. Upon elevation of lipids in the bloodstream, a metabolic condition referred as “hyperlipidemia", macrophages take up excessive amounts of cholesterol, resulting in formation of foam cells or inflammatory macrophages. Notably, the accumulation of cholesterol in macrophages induced synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including TNFα and IL6, by activating the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB) and the mitogen-activated protein kinases-mediated inflammatory pathways [19, 20]. Importantly, the activation of all these inflammatory pathways required cholesterol trafficking to ER and were modulated by PERK- and IRE1α-mediated UPR signaling. It has been demonstrated that the accumulation of cholesterol in macrophage leads to overload of unesterified, or “free” cholesterol in the ER membranes and subsequent depletion of ER calcium stores [17]. This condition causes ER stress and elicits the UPR in the macrophages as shown by the activation of three ER stress sensors, including PERK, IRE1α and ATF6, and their downstream effector molecules. Interestingly, CHOP, the target of PERK-mediated UPR pathway, is required for IL6 induction and full activation of Erk kinase induced by overload of cholesterol [19]. However, one or more other ER stress response pathways, possibly the ER-overload response, might also contribute to NF-kB activation induced by cholesterol accumulation, as the ER calcium release and ROS generation occurred with cholesterol overloading in the macrophage [19, 21]. Eventually, if the hyperlipidemia condition becomes chronic, the ER stress-induced pro-apoptotic factor CHOP would be activated to induce macrophage death that possibly contributes to necrosis and plaque disruption in atherosclerotic lesion [17, 22].

Homocysteine

Homocysteine is a sulfur-containing amino acid that is generated inside the body and required for biosynthesis of methionine and cysteine. The absence of vitamin B6, B12 or folic acid in food, or chronic alcohol consumption can affect activities of enzymes required for methionine, homocysteine and cysteine metabolisms and subsequently lead to accumulation of homocysteine in the body. Homocysteine has been considered as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. The highly reactive thiol group of homocysteine undergoes oxidization to form ROS, inducing oxidative stress and the inflammatory response [23, 24]. Homocysteine can also interrupt disulfide bond formation during protein folding, and thus causing ER stress and activation of the UPR [25, 26]. In fact, multiple cellular stress pathways including ER stress, oxidative stress, and inflammation are associated with accelerated atherosclerosis in animal models fed with high-homocysteine diets. Markers of ER stress (GRP78/94 and phospho-PERK), oxidative stress (HSP70), and inflammation (phospho-lkB) were simultaneously detected in advanced atherosclerotic lesions fed with high-homocysteine diets. ER stress-induced apoptosis, which is synergized by oxidative stress and inflammatory signaling, likely accounts for the cell injury and dysfunction during atherosclerosis induced by homocysteine [27].

Cytokines

Pro-inflammatory cytokines including TNFa, IL6, and IL1b can induce ER stress in liver hepatocytes, leading to the activation of the hepatocyte-specific stress sensor CREBH to mediate a liver acute phase response [28]. In mouse cancer fibrosarcoma cells, TNFα appears to be a strong ER stress inducer that activates three major UPR pathways as shown by PERK-mediated elF2α phosphorylation, Xbp1 mRNA splicing and ATF6 cleavage [29]. In the central nervous system, the presence of T cell-derived cytokine interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) was associated with the activation of the PERK branch of the UPR and ER stress-induced apoptosis in the oligodendrocyte, a cell type that produces vast amounts of myelin [30-32]. Myelin is a unique, lipid-rich, multilamellar sheath that wraps axons of neurons. Thus, IFN-γ is believed to contribute to immune-mediated demyelinatingdisorders by inducing ER stress-mediated oligodendrocyte death. It has been documented that those inflammatory cytokines induce ER stress by triggering calcium signals and accumulation of ROS associated with the ER protein folding process and mitochondrial metabolisms [30]. ER stress can also arise in the inflammatory state of obese adipose tissue. In obesity, elevated levels of cytokine and hormones, such as leptin, insulin, TNFα, IL6, and IL1β, stimulate metabolisms and cell differentiation programs in the liver, adipose, and pancreas, leading to increased protein folding demands to the ER [33]. This situation would result in a physiological UPR and chronic inflammation in the specialized cell types, such as macrophages, hepatocytes, adipocytes, and pancreatic β cells [34]. Additionally, the bacterial toxin lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a strong inducer of the inflammatory response, has been shown to induce ER stress and ER stress-associated apoptosis in the liver and lung tissues [28, 35].

Glucose

Glucose is a primary source of energy and metabolic intermediate in most organisms from bacteria to humans. The metabolism of glucose is tightly controlled at the levels of synthesis and utilization through hormonal regulation [36]. The ER is exquisitely sensitive to glucose availability. The blood glucose levels influence the energy supply for the protein folding process in the ER, and thus are associated with the activation of the UPR and inflammation by stimulating ER stress and the production of free radicals. UPR signaling has been proposed to be essential to maintain glucose homeostasis [37]. This is well exemplified in pancreatic β cells, the specialized insulin-producing cells. As blood glucose declines, energy may become limiting for protein folding in the ER and therefore PERK-mediated UPR pathway may be activated, leading to translational attenuation to reduce the ER workload. As blood glucose levels rise, the UPR pathways are turned off so that translation would accelerate, allowing entry of new proinsulin into the ER. However, continual elevation of blood glucose could prolong elevated proinsulin translation and eventually activate the UPR as the secretion capacity of the ER is overwhelmed [38]. This condition could also induce inflammation as characterized by increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines [39, 40]. Therefore, a delicate balance between glucose levels and the UPR needs to be maintained. Disturbances in either direction may lead to β cell dysfunction.

Fatty acids

Accumulating evidence suggested that saturated fatty acids, such as palmitate and oleate, can induce ER stress and ER stress-associated apoptosis in various metabolic cells by triggering calcium signals and free radicals [34, 41]. Palmitate, the major saturated fatty acid in the “Western” style diet, was shown to induced ER stress-associated apoptosis mediated through CHOP in liver cells [41]. The presence of increased circulating and/or hepatic saturated fatty acids (palmitate and stearate), but not polyunsaturated fatty acids (oleate and linoleate) may exacerbate steatohepatitis and lipotoxicity through activating ER stress-associated apoptosis [41, 42]. These observations implicated a crucial role for the signaling pathways from the ER in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Moreover, inhibition of ER calcium release by calcium chelators can prevent saturated fatty acid-induced ER stress and apoptosis in H4IIE liver cells and in primary rat hepatocytes, supporting that saturated fatty acids induce ER stress through disrupting ER calcium pool [43]. More recently, palmitate was shown to induce ER stress and apoptosis in hypothalamic neurons through a c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)-dependent pathway [44]. Palmitate can also induce lipotoxic ER stress in pancreatic β cells via the effect on intracellular calcium homeostasis [45, 46].

In addition to those described above, many other metabolic factors can also induce both ER stress and inflammatory pathways in a variety of cell types when they are in pathological excess. For example, neurotransmitters including 6-hydroxydopamine and glutamine can induce the UPR and inflammation in cellular models of Parkinson's disease by disrupting calcium homeostasis and/or stimulating oxidative stress in the neuron cells [47] [48]. Notably, most of those effects are generated by the similar mechanism involving production of calcium signals and reactive oxygen intermediates.

Calcium and free radicals as the messengers triggering ER stress, oxidative stress, and the inflammatory response

Calcium and free radicals including ROS and NO are intracellular signaling messengers that play critical roles in cell physiology and disease pathogenesis. In fact, calcium signals and free radicals are major inflammatory mediators. Over the past few years, it has become increasingly apparent that calcium and free radicals are essential mediators that link ER stress to inflammation during metabolic processes. As an intracellular calcium store, the ER possesses calcium at a concentration thousands of times greater than that in the cytosol. The calcium levels inside the ER are modulated by the ER-located calcium release channels, including inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (IP3R) and the ryanodine receptor, the calcium uptake mechanism mediated through Sarco/Endoplasmic Reticulum Calcium ATPase (SERCA), and numerous ER-associated enzymatic cascades [49-52]. ER stress-inducing pharmaceutical agents and many metabolic factors, such as cytokines, hormones, neurotransmitters, and lipids, can target on ER-based calcium channels and affect the activities of calcium-dependent protein folding enzymes, leading to the release of Ca2+ from the ER lumen [7, 16, 53]. This will increase the concentration of cytosolic Ca2+ influx, which subsequently stimulates the mitochondria metabolism to generate more ROS. ROS can further target the ER calcium channels and protein folding enzymes to exacerbate ER calcium release and ER stress. As a consequence, unfolded or misfolded proteins accumulate in the ER, followed by the activation of the UPR pathways to promote the inflammatory response, anti-oxidative response, apoptosis, and other stress response pathways [6, 7] (Figure 1). This forward vicious cycle may account for many pathological processes that are triggered by inflammatory stimuli, oxidative stress, and/or ER stress. Notably, recent studies suggested that mitochondria can form junctions with the sarco/ER, which provides a platform for the local calcium-ROS interaction [52, 54].

NO is a free radical gas produced during a variety of metabolic processes, such as regulation of blood vessel dilatation, immune response, and neurotransmissions. Accumulation of a large amount of NO is toxic to the host and known to cause many deterious diseases including hypotension, septic shock, neurodegenerative disease, and diabetes. Excessive NO can target on ER calcium stores and mitochondrial electron transfer chains, causing ER stress and production of ROS. This mechanism accounts for most NO-induced inflammation and metabolic disorders. In addition, recent findings suggest that NO can inhibit the activity of protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) that is required for protein disulfide bond formation, thereby hampering proper protein folding and aggravating ER stress in neuronal cells [55].

Specialized cell types in which ER stress, oxidative stress, and the inflammatory response are integrated

The cross-talks between ER stress, oxidative stress and the inflammatory response are well demonstrated at the functional interface of professional cells of primarily immune or metabolic nature. Those cells, including liver hepatocytes, macrophages, adipocytes, pancreatic β cells, and neuronal oligodendrocytes, are specialized for a high secretory capacity in cope with the increased demand of protein synthesis [7, 56, 57]. Therefore, they are exquisitely sensitive to ER stress or changes of metabolic status. In those cells, nutrients such as glucose, lipids, and cytokines can activate both the UPR and the inflammatory pathways by triggering calcium signals, ROS, and/or NO. The inflammatory stress signaling regulates the production of various cytokines including TNFα and IL6, and promotes production of other metabolic factors classified as hormones, growth factors, and neurotransmitters to mount a broader inflammatory response. For example, adipocyte is the most abundant cell type composing the adipose tissue. In addition to its inherent properties of fat cells in energy storage, adipocytes play a crucial role in the generation of a variety of proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines and hormones [57]. Metabolic conditions, such as lipid accumulation, elevated glucose or excessive cytokines, can stimulate increased demands for protein synthesis and production of ROS in adipocytes, which subsequently induce the UPR and inflammatory response to accelerate production of cytokines and hormones [57, 58]. Integrated UPR and inflammatory signaling in adipocytes may significantly contribute to the inflammatory state of obesity that is associated with insulin resistance. A similar “stress-inflammation” interactive loop also occur to macrophages and pancreatic β cells where ER stress, oxidative stress, and inflammation interact and amplify by attacking the ER and mitochondria as well as various other metabolic pathways [7, 19, 33, 59].

Concluding remark

We discussed recent evidence of the integration of ER stress, oxidative stress, and inflammation in health and disease. Depending on the cell type and physiological process, either ER stress, or oxidative stress, or the inflammatory response may be more prominent or upstream of the others. However, these signaling pathways interact and are ultimately integrated in the pathogenesis of a variety of diseases. The related information is particularly important for the design of effective therapeutics for the inflammatory diseases by modulating ER stress, oxidative stress, and/or the inflammatory response. Given the complexity of stress signaling network, targeting a signal inflammatory stress mediator may not be effective or beneficial in controlling disease pathogenesis. Therefore, the research work in delineating the interface of stress signaling and the inflammatory response will definitely contribute to our better understanding of the pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases as well as pharmaceutical interventions toward controlling inflammation and stress.

Acknowledgments

The research in the Zhang laboratory is partially supported by the American Heart Association (AHA) Scientist Development Award (0635423Z), the AHA Grant-in-Aid (09GRNT2280479), the Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program (BC095179P1), and the Karmanos Cancer Institute pilot grant.

References

  • 1.Gething MJ, Sambrook J. Protein folding in the cell. Nature. 1992;355:33–45. doi: 10.1038/355033a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kaufman RJ. Stress signaling from the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum: coordination of gene transcriptional and translational controls. Genes.Dev. 1999;13:1211–1233. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.10.1211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.McMillian DR, Gething MJ, Sambrook J. The cellular response to unfolded proteins: Intercom-partmental Signaling. Current Opinions in Biotechnology. 1994;5:540–545. doi: 10.1016/0958-1669(94)90071-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sidrauski C, Chapman R, Walter P. The unfolded protein response: an intracellular signalling pathway with many surprising features. Trends.Cell Biol. 1998;8:245–249. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(98)01267-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mori K. Tripartite management of unfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum. Cell. 2000;101:451–454. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80855-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ron D, Walter P. Signal integration in the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:519–529. doi: 10.1038/nrm2199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang K, Kaufman RJ. From endoplasmic-reticulum stress to the inflammatory response. Nature. 2008;454:455–462. doi: 10.1038/nature07203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mori K, Ma W, Gething MJ, Sambrook J. A transmembrane protein with a cdc2+/CDC28-related kinase activity is required for signaling from the ER to the nucleus. Cell. 1993;74:743–756. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90521-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cox JS, Shamu CE, Walter P. Transcriptional induction of genes encoding endoplasmic reticulum resident proteins requires a transmembrane protein kinase. Cell. 1993;73:1197–1206. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90648-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lee AH, Iwakoshi NN, Glimcher LH. XBP-1 regulates a subset of endoplasmic reticulum resident chaperone genes in the unfolded protein response. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23:7448–7459. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.21.7448-7459.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shi Y, Vattem KM, Sood R, An J, Liang J, Stramm L, Wek RC. Identification and characterization of pancreatic eukaryotic initiation factor 2 alpha-subunit kinase, PEK, involved in translational control. Mol.Cell Biol. 1998;18:7499–7509. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.12.7499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Harding HP, Zhang Y, Ron D. Protein translation and folding are coupled by an endoplasmic-reticulum- resident kinase [In Process Citation] Nature. 1999;397:271–274. doi: 10.1038/16729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Haze K, Yoshida H, Yanagi H, Yura T, Mori K. Mammalian transcription factor ATF6 is synthesized as a transmembrane protein and activated by proteolysis in response to endoplasmic reticulum stress. Mol.Biol Cell. 1999;10:3787–3799. doi: 10.1091/mbc.10.11.3787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Okada T, Yoshida H, Akazawa R, Negishi M, Mori K. Distinct roles of activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) and double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) in transcription during the mammalian unfolded protein response. Biochem J. 2002;366:585–594. doi: 10.1042/BJ20020391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhang K, Kaufman RJ. Identification and characterization of endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis in vivo. Methods Enzymol. 2008;442:395–419. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(08)01420-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Malhotra JD, Miao H, Zhang K, Wolfson A, Pennathur S, Pipe SW, Kaufman RJ. Antioxidants reduce endoplasmic reticulum stress and improve protein secretion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:18525–18530. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809677105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Feng B, Yao PM, Li Y, Devlin CM, Zhang D, Harding HP, Sweeney M, Rong JX, Kuriakose G, Fisher EA, Marks AR, Ron D, Tabas I. The endoplasmic reticulum is the site of cholesterol-induced cytotoxicity in macrophages. Nat Cell Biol. 2003;5:781–792. doi: 10.1038/ncb1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tabas I, Seimon T, Timmins J, Li G, Lim W. Macrophage apoptosis in advanced atherosclerosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1173(Suppl 1):E40–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04957.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li Y, Schwabe RF, DeVries-Seimon T, Yao PM, Gerbod-Giannone MC, Tall AR, Davis RJ, Flavell R, Brenner DA, Tabas I. Free cholesterol-loaded macrophages are an abundant source of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6: model of NF-kappaB- and map kinase-dependent inflammation in advanced atherosclerosis. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:21763–21772. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M501759200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hu P, Han Z, Couvillon AD, Kaufman RJ, Exton JH. Autocrine tumor necrosis factor alpha links endoplasmic reticulum stress to the membrane death receptor pathway through IRE1alpha-mediated NF-kappaB activation and down-regulation of TRAF2 expression. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:3071–3084. doi: 10.1128/MCB.26.8.3071-3084.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pahl HL, Baeuerle PA. The ER-overload response: activation of NF-kappa B. Trends Bio-chem Sci. 1997;22:63–67. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(96)10073-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Devries-Seimon T, Li Y, Yao PM, Stone E, Wang Y, Davis RJ, Flavell R, Tabas I. Cholesterol-induced macrophage apoptosis requires ER stress pathways and engagement of the type A scavenger receptor. J Cell Biol. 2005;171:61–73. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200502078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Starkebaum G, Harlan JM. Endothelial cell injury due to copper-catalyzed hydrogen peroxide generation from homocysteine. J Clin Invest. 1986;77:1370–1376. doi: 10.1172/JCI112442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Welch GN, Loscalzo J. Homocysteine and atherothrombosis. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1042–1050. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199804093381507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lentz SR, Sadler JE. Homocysteine inhibits von Willebrand factor processing and secretion by preventing transport from the endoplasmic reticulum. Blood. 1993;81:683–689. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Werstuck GH, Lentz SR, Dayal S, Hossain GS, Sood SK, Shi YY, Zhou J, Maeda N, Krisans SK, Malinow MR, Austin RC. Homocysteine-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress causes dysregulation of the cholesterol and triglyceride biosynthetic pathways. J Clin Invest. 2001;107:1263–1273. doi: 10.1172/JCI11596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhou J, Werstuck GH, Lhotak S, de Koning AB, Sood SK, Hossain GS, Moller J, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, Falk E, Dayal S, Lentz SR, Austin RC. Association of multiple cellular stress pathways with accelerated atherosclerosis in hyperhomo-cysteinemic apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Circulation. 2004;110:207–213. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000134487.51510.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhang K, Shen X, Wu J, Sakaki K, Saunders T, Rutkowski DT, Back SH, Kaufman RJ. Endoplasmic reticulum stress activates cleavage of CREBH to induce a systemic inflammatory response. Cell. 2006;124:587–599. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.11.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Xue X, Piao JH, Nakajima A, Sakon-Komazawa S, Kojima Y, Mori K, Yagita H, Okumura K, Harding H, Nakano H. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) induces the unfolded protein response (UPR) in a reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent fashion, and the UPR counteracts ROS accumulation by TNFalpha. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:33917–33925. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M505818200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lin W, Harding HP, Ron D, Popko B. Endoplasmic reticulum stress modulates the response of myelinating oligodendrocytes to the immune cytokine interferon-gamma. J Cell Biol. 2005;169:603–612. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200502086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lin W, Kemper A, Dupree JL, Harding HP, Ron D, Popko B. Interferon-gamma inhibits central nervous system remyelination through a process modulated by endoplasmic reticulum stress. Brain. 2006;129:1306–1318. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lin W, Bailey SL, Ho H, Harding HP, Ron D, Miller SD, Popko B. The integrated stress response prevents demyelination by protecting oligodendrocytes against immune-mediated damage. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:448–456. doi: 10.1172/JCI29571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hotamisligil GS. Inflammation and metabolic disorders. Nature. 2006;444:860–867. doi: 10.1038/nature05485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kharroubi I, Ladriere L, Cardozo AK, Dogusan Z, Cnop M, Eizirik DL. Free fatty acids and cyto-kines induce pancreatic beta-cell apoptosis by different mechanisms: role of nuclear factor-kappaB and endoplasmic reticulum stress. Endocrinology. 2004;145:5087–5096. doi: 10.1210/en.2004-0478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Endo M, Oyadomari S, Suga M, Mori M, Gotoh T. The ER stress pathway involving CHOP is activated in the lungs of LPS-treated mice. J Biochem. 2005;138:501–507. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvi143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Itoh N, Okamoto H. Translational control of proinsulin synthesis by glucose. Nature. 1980;283:100–102. doi: 10.1038/283100a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kaufman RJ, Scheuner D, Schroder M, Shen X, Lee K, Liu CY, Arnold SM. The unfolded protein response in nutrient sensing and differentiation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002;3:411–421. doi: 10.1038/nrm829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Scheuner D, Vander Mierde D, Song B, Flamez D, Creemers JW, Tsukamoto K, Ribick M, Schuit FC, Kaufman RJ. Control of mRNA translation preserves endoplasmic reticulum function in beta cells and maintains glucose homeostasis. Nat Med. 2005;11:757–764. doi: 10.1038/nm1259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Patel C, Ghanim H, Ravishankar S, Sia CL, Viswanathan P, Mohanty P, Dandona P. Prolonged reactive oxygen species generation and nuclear factor-kappaB activation after a high-fat, high-carbohydrate meal in the obese. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:4476–4479. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-0778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Boni-Schnetzler M, Thorne J, Parnaud G, Marselli L, Ehses JA, Kerr-Conte J, Pattou F, Halban PA, Weir GC, Donath MY. Increased interleukin (IL)-1beta messenger ribonucleic acid expression in beta -cells of individuals with type 2 diabetes and regulation of IL-1beta in human islets by glucose and autostimulation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:4065–4074. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-0396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wei Y, Wang D, Topczewski F, Pagliassotti MJ. Saturated fatty acids induce endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis independently of ceramide in liver cells. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2006;291:E275–281. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00644.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wang D, Wei Y, Pagliassotti MJ. Saturated fatty acids promote endoplasmic reticulum stress and liver injury in rats with hepatic steatosis. Endocrinology. 2006;147:943–951. doi: 10.1210/en.2005-0570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wei Y, Wang D, Gentile CL, Pagliassotti MJ. Reduced endoplasmic reticulum luminal calcium links saturated fatty acid-mediated endoplasmic reticulum stress and cell death in liver cells. Mol Cell Biochem. 2009;331:31–40. doi: 10.1007/s11010-009-0142-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mayer CM, Belsham DD. Palmitate Attenuates Insulin Signaling and Induces Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Apoptosis in Hypothalamic Neurons: Rescue of Resistance and Apoptosis through Adenosine 5’ Monophosphate-Activated Protein Kinase Activation. Endocrinology. 2009 doi: 10.1210/en.2009-1122. Epub ahead of print, PMID 19952270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lai E, Bikopoulos G, Wheeler MB, Rozakis-Adcock M, Volchuk A. Differential activation of ER stress and apoptosis in response to chronically elevated free fatty acids in pancreatic beta-cells. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2008;294:E540–550. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00478.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gwiazda KS, Yang TL, Lin Y, Johnson JD. Effects of palmitate on ER and cytosolic Ca2+ homeostasis in beta-cells. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2009;296:E690–701. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.90525.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ryu EJ, Harding HP, Angelastro JM, Vitolo OV, Ron D, Greene LA. Endoplasmic reticulum stress and the unfolded protein response in cellular models of Parkinson's disease. J Neuro-sci. 2002;22:10690–10698. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-24-10690.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yamamuro A, Yoshioka Y, Ogita K, Maeda S. Involvement of endoplasmic reticulum stress on the cell death induced by 6-hydroxydopamine in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. Neuro-chem Res. 2006;31:657–664. doi: 10.1007/s11064-006-9062-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Luo X, He Q, Huang Y, Sheikh MS. Transcriptional upregulation of PUMA modulates endoplasmic reticulum calcium pool depletioninduced apoptosis via Bax activation. Cell Death Differ. 2005;12:1310–1318. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Oakes SA, Scorrano L, Opferman JT, Bassik MC, Nishino M, Pozzan T, Korsmeyer SJ. Proapoptotic BAX and BAK regulate the type 1 inositol trisphosphate receptor and calcium leak from the endoplasmic reticulum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:105–110. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408352102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hajnoczky G, Csordas G, Krishnamurthy R, Szalai G. Mitochondrial calcium signaling driven by the IP3 receptor. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2000;32:15–25. doi: 10.1023/a:1005504210587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Csordas G, Hajnoczky G. SR/ER-mitochondrial local communication: calcium and ROS. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1787:1352–1362. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2009.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Deniaud A, Sharaf el dein O, Maillier E, Poncet D, Kroemer G, Lemaire C, Brenner C. Endoplasmic reticulum stress induces calcium-dependent permeability transition, mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization and apoptosis. Oncogene. 2008;27:285–299. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yan Y, Liu J, Wei C, Li K, Xie W, Wang Y, Cheng H. Bidirectional regulation of Ca2+ sparks by mitochondria-derived reactive oxygen species in cardiac myocytes. Cardiovasc Res. 2008;77:432–441. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvm047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Uehara T, Nakamura T, Yao D, Shi ZQ, Gu Z, Ma Y, Masliah E, Nomura Y, Lipton SA. S-nitrosylated protein-disulphide isomerase links protein misfolding to neurodegeneration. Nature. 2006;441:513–517. doi: 10.1038/nature04782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Schenk S, Saberi M, Olefsky JM. Insulin sensitivity: modulation by nutrients and inflammation. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:2992–3002. doi: 10.1172/JCI34260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gregor MG, Hotamisligil GS. Adipocyte stress: The endoplasmic reticulum and metabolic disease. J Lipid Res. 2007;48:1905–1914. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R700007-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lionetti L, Mollica MP, Lombardi A, Cavaliere G, Gifuni G, Barletta A. From chronic overnutrition to insulin resistance: the role of fat-storing capacity and inflammation. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2009;19:146–152. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2008.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Gurzov EN, Ortis F, Cunha DA, Gosset G, Li M, Cardozo AK, Eizirik DL. Signaling by IL-1beta+IFN-gamma and ER stress converge on DP5/Hrk activation: a novel mechanism for pancreatic beta-cell apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2009;16:1539–1550. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2009.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES