Skip to main content
PMC home page
BMC Plant Biology logoLink to BMC Plant Biology
. 2010 Mar 7;10:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-42

Effects of manganese-excess on CO2 assimilation, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase, carbohydrates and photosynthetic electron transport of leaves, and antioxidant systems of leaves and roots in Citrus grandis seedlings

Qing Li 1,2, Li-Song Chen 1,2,3,✉, Huan-Xin Jiang 1,4, Ning Tang 1,2, Lin-Tong Yang 1,2, Zheng-He Lin 1, Yan Li 5, Gang-Hua Yang 1,4
PMCID: PMC2848762  PMID: 20205939

Abstract

Background

Very little is known about the effects of manganese (Mn)-excess on citrus photosynthesis and antioxidant systems. Seedlings of sour pummelo (Citrus grandis) were irrigated for 17 weeks with nutrient solution containing 2 μM (control) or 500 μM (excess) MnSO4. The objective of this study were to understand the mechanisms by which Mn-excess leads to a decrease in CO2 assimilation and to test the hypothesis that Mn-induced changes in antioxidant systems differ between roots and leaves.

Results

Mn-excess decreased CO2 assimilation and stomatal conductance, increased intercellular CO2 concentration, but did not affect chlorophyll (Chl) level. Both initial and total ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) activity in Mn-excess leaves decreased to a lesser extent than CO2 assimilation. Contents of glucose, fructose, starch and total nonstructural carbohydrates did not differ between Mn-excess leaves and controls, while sucrose content was higher in the former. Chl a fluorescence (OJIP) transients from Mn-excess leaves showed increased O-step and decreased P-step, accompanied by positive L- and K-bands. Mn-excess decreased maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry (Fv/Fm) and total performance index (PItot,abs), but increased relative variable fluorescence at I-steps (VI) and energy dissipation. On a protein basis, Mn-excess leaves displayed higher activities of monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDAR), glutathione reductase (GR), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and guaiacol peroxidase (GPX) and contents of antioxidants, similar ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activities and lower dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR) activities; while Mn-excess roots had similar or lower activities of antioxidant enzymes and contents of antioxidants. Mn-excess did not affect malondialdehyde (MDA) content of roots and leaves.

Conclusions

Mn-excess impaired the whole photosynthetic electron transport chain from the donor side of photosystem II (PSII) up to the reduction of end acceptors of photosystem I (PSI), thus limiting the production of reducing equivalents, and hence the rate of CO2 assimilation. Both the energy dissipation and the antioxidant systems were enhanced in Mn-excess leaves, while the antioxidant systems in Mn-excess roots were not up-regulated, but still remained high activity. The antioxidant systems in Mn-excess roots and leaves provided sufficient protection to them against oxidative damage.

Background

Manganese (Mn) is an essential micronutrient required for the normal growth of higher plants. Like other heavy metals, however, Mn may become toxic when present in excess [1]. Acid soils comprise up to 50% of the world's potentially arable lands. After aluminum (Al), Mn toxicity is probably the most important factor limiting plant productivity in acid soils [2].

Previous studies have shown that Mn-excess can inhibit CO2 assimilation in many plants including tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) [3,4], wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) [5,6], cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) [7], ricebean (Vigna umbellata L.) [8], white birch (Betula platyphylla Suk.) [9], rice (Oryza sativa L.) [10], common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) [11], mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) [12], Alnus hirsuta Turcz., Betula ermanii Charm., Ulmus davidiana Planch. and Acer mono Maxim. [13]. Suresh et al. [14] observed a decrease in stomatal conductance and transpiration rate with increasing Mn content in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] and concluded that Mn interfered with stomatal regulation. Unfortunately, no other parameters related to photosynthesis were presented in this paper, and it was not possible to determine whether decreased stomatal conductance was a primary effect of Mn toxicity or a result of serious leaf damage. Nable et al. [4] showed that the inhibition of photosynthesis in tobacco leaves was not a consequence of decreased stomatal conductance, because both intercellular CO2 concentration and rate of transpiration were not affected. Similar results have been obtained for wheat [5], ricebean [8], rice [10] and cucumber [7]. Macfie and Taylor [6] reported that the photosynthetic rate per unit chlorophyll (Chl) decreased in the sensitive wheat cultivar as Mn concentration in solution increased, indicating that Mn exerted its toxic effect on both Chl content and photosynthesis per unit Chl. Mn-induced decrease in photosynthetic rate through the decrease of Chl content has also been reported for common bean [11]. In contrast, Nable et al. [4] observed that the decline of photosynthesis in tobacco leaves preceded Chl degradation. Houtz et al. [3] concluded that the inhibitory effect of Mn toxicity on photosynthesis was due to Mn2+ induced modification of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco, EC 4.1.1.39) kinetics. Kitao et al. [9] suggested that excess Mn in white birch leaves affected the activities of the CO2 reduction cycle rather than the potential efficiency of photochemistry (Fv/Fm), leading to an increase in QA reduction state and thermal energy dissipation, and a decrease in photosystem II (PSII) quantum efficiency (quantum yield of PSII). Similar results have been found in Alnus hirsuta Turcz., Betula ermanii Charm., Ulmus davidiana Planch. and Acer mono Maxim. [13]. However, Chatterjee et al. [15] showed that in vitro Rubisco activity did not change in wheat plants treated with excess Mn, while Hill reaction activity was lower. The activities of photochemistry including Hill, photosystem I (PSI) and PSII partial reactions of chloroplasts from Mn-excess tobacco leaves were reported to remain constant despite ultimate development of severe necrosis [4], but Mn-excess decreased CO2 assimilation, Fv/Fm and PSII quantum efficiency in cucumber leaves [7]. Sinha et al. [12] showed that Mn toxicity decreased Hill activity of chloroplast isolated from mungbean leaves and photosynthetic rate in term of CO2 uptake. Doncheva et al. [16] reported that Mn-excess did not affect Fv/Fm and PSII quantum efficiency in Mn-tolerant maize (Zea mays L.) 'Kneja 434', but the two parameters significantly decreased in Mn-sensitive maize 'Kneja 605' at the highest Mn concentration. Experiment with wheat chloroplast suggested that the decrease in photosynthesis by excess leaf Mn was due to the peroxidative impairment of the thylakoid membrane function [17]. St. Clair et al. [18] observed that high Mn impaired the photosynthetic function of sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) and red maple (Acer rubrum L.), particularly in high light conditions, but antioxidant enzyme and quantum yield of PSII/quantum yield of CO2 fixation data suggested that this response was not the result of photo-oxidative stress. Therefore, the mechanisms by which Mn-excess leads to a decrease in CO2 assimilation are still not well understood.

Mn toxicity can induce oxidative stress through direct generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) from Mn ions in the Fenton reaction [19] or direct transfer of electrons in single reaction, leading to a rise ROS level [20,21]. To minimize cellular damage caused by ROS, plants have evolved a scavenging system composed of antioxidants such as ascorbate (ASC) and reduced glutathione (GSH) and antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD, EC 1.15.1.1), ascorbate peroxidase (APX, EC 1.11.1.11), glutathione reductase (GR, EC 1.6.4.2), monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDAR, EC 1.6.5.4), and dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR, EC 1.8.5.1), catalase (CAT, EC 1.11.1.16) and guaiacol peroxidase (GPX, EC 1.11.1.7) [22,23]. Despite the large body of evidence concerning the effects of Mn toxicity on the antioxidant systems in plant leaves [7,18,21,23-26], very little is known about the effects of Mn-excess on root antioxidant systems. Shi et al. [23] reported that in cucumber roots, Mn-excess increased the activities of Mn-SOD and Fe-SOD, but decreased the activities of Cu/Zn-SOD and CAT, and Mn-excess also affected the activities of GPX, APX, DHAR and GR. Experiments with other heavy metals have shown that the changes in antioxidant systems differ between roots and leaves in response to excess heavy metals [27-29], and may be a response to Mn-excess. In a study, Boojar and Goodariz [20] reported that the activities of SOD, CAT and GPX in the roots and leaves of Datura stramonium, and Chenopodium ambrosioides were enhanced in response to Mn-excess. Unfortunately, the activities of other antioxidant enzymes and the contents of ASC, dehydroascorbate (DHA), GSH and oxidized glutathione (GSSG) were not presented in this paper.

Citrus belongs to evergreen subtropical fruit trees and is cultivated in humid and subhumid of tropical, subtropical, and temperate regions of the world mainly on acid soils. Although the effects of Mn-excess on leaf structure and chloroplast ultrastructure of Citrus volkameriana L. have been investigated [30], there is hardly any information on photosynthesis and antioxidant systems of citrus in response to Mn-excess. In this study, we investigated the effects of Mn-excess on CO2 assimilation, Rubisco, carbohydrates and photosynthetic electron transport in leaves, and antioxidant systems in roots and leaves of sour pummelo [Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck]. The objective of this study were to understand the mechanisms by which Mn-excess leads to a decrease in CO2 assimilation and to test the hypothesis that Mn-induced changes in antioxidant systems differ between roots and leaves.

Results

Seedling growth and specific weight

Mn-excess decreased root, stem and leaf dry weight (DW), and specific leaf weight. Leaf and stem DW decreased to a larger extent than root DW in response to Mn-excess, and resulted in a greater root DW/shoot DW ratio (Table 1).

Table 1.

Effects of Mn-excess on leaf, stem and root DW, and specific leaf weight in sour pummelo seedlings

Treatments Root DW
(g plant-1)		 Stem DW
(g plant-1)		 Leaf DW
(g plant-1)		 Root DW/Shoot DW Specific leaf weight
(g FW m-2) (g DW m-2)
Control 5.83 ± 0.68 a 6.16 ± 0.64 a 10.41 ± 0.59 a 0.35 ± 0.02 b 275 ± 4 a 124 ± 3 a
Mn-excess 3.68 ± 0.62 b 3.16 ± 0.68 b 5.78 ± 0.86 b 0.41 ± 0.02 a 244 ± 10 b 109 ± 5 b
Open in a new tab

Data are means ± standard errors (n = 5 or 10). Within a column, values followed by different letters are significantly different at P < 0.05.

Mn, total soluble protein, Chl and carotenoids (Car)

Mn-excess increased root, stem and leaf Mn content, but decreased leaf soluble protein content expressed on a leaf area (Table 2), fresh weight (FW) or DW (data not shown) basis and root soluble protein expressed on a root FW (Table 2) or DW (data not shown) basis.

Table 2.

Effects of Mn-excess on Mn content of roots, stems and leaves, and total soluble protein content of roots and leaves in sour pummelo seedlings

Treatments Mn (μ g g-1 DW) Soluble protein
Roots Stems Leaves Leaves (g m-2) Roots (mg g-1 FW)
Control 124.5 ± 11.7 b 6.5 ± 0.4 b 18.4 ± 1.8 b 8.4 ± 0.2 a 10.6 ± 0.5 a
Mn-excess 11471.2 ± 1457.8 a 583.6 ± 101.2 a 906.3 ± 123.1 a 6.5 ± 0.2 b 8.2 ± 0.5 b
Open in a new tab

Data are means ± standard errors (n = 5-8). Within a column, values followed by different letters are significantly different at P < 0.05.

Mn-excess did not significantly affect the contents of Chl, Chl a, Chl b and Car, whether the data were expressed on a leaf area (Table 3), FW or DW (data not shown) basis. Mn-excess significantly decreased the ratio of Chl a/b, but significantly increased the ratio of Car/Chl (Table 3).

Table 3.

Effects of Mn-excess on Chl and Car contents in sour pummelo leaves

Treatments Chl
(mg m-2)		 Chl a
(mg m-2)		 Chl b
(mg m-2)		 Chl a/b Car
(mg m-2)		 Car/Chl
Control 587 ± 24 a 435 ± 16 a 152 ± 8 a 2.88 ± 0.04 a 118 ± 5 a 0.201 ± 0.003 b
Mn-excess 526 ± 28 a 384 ± 22 a 141 ± 5 a 2.72 ± 0.06 b 112 ± 5 a 0.213 ± 0.002 a
Open in a new tab

Data are means ± standard errors (n = 6). Within a column, values followed by different letters are significantly different at P < 0.05.

Leaf gas exchange and Rubisco

Both CO2 assimilation (Fig. 1A) and stomatal conductance (Fig. 1B) significantly decreased, but intercellular CO2 concentration (Fig. 1C) significantly increased in Mn-excess leaves compared with controls.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Effects of Mn-excess on CO2assimilation (A), stomatal conductance (B), and intercellular CO2 concentration (C), initial Rubisco activity (D and E), total Rubisco activity (F and G) and Rubisco activation state (H) in sour pummelo leaves. Bars represent means ± standard errors (n = 4-8). Different letters above standard error bars indicate significant differences at P < 0.05.

Both initial and total Rubisco activity was significantly lower in Mn-excess leaves than in controls except for a similar initial activity expressed on a leaf protein basis between the Mn treatments (Fig. 1D-G), while Mn-excess did not significantly affect Rubisco activation state (Fig. 1H).

Leaf nonstructural carbohydrates

As shown in Fig. 2, there were no significant differences in the contents of glucose, fructose, starch, and total nonstructural carbohydrates (TNC) between the Mn treatments regardless of how the data were expressed, while sucrose content was significantly higher in Mn-excess leaves. Expressed on a DW basis, Mn-excess leaves displayed a higher content of soluble sugars (glucose + fructose + sucrose), but a similar content of soluble sugars on an area basis.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Effects of Mn-excess on contents of glucose (Glu, A and G), fructose (Fru, B and H), sucrose (Suc, C and I), Glu + Fru + Suc (D and J), starch (E and K) and total nonstructural carbohydrates (TNC, F and L) of sour pummelo leaves expressed on a leaf area (A-F) or DW (G-L) basis. Bars represent means ± standard errors (n = 6). Different letters above standard error bars indicate significant differences at P < 0.05.

Leaf Chl a fluorescence (OJIP) transients and related parameters

All OJIP transients from both Mn-excess and control leaves displayed a typical polyphasic rise with the basic steps of O-J-I-P. Mn-excess resulted in an increase in the heterogeneity of samples. OJIP transients from Mn-excess leaves showed a rise at the O-step and a depression at the P-step (Fig. 3A-B).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Effects of Mn-excess on OJIP transients (A and B), and the different expressions of relative variable fluorescence derived from the average OJIP transients: (C) between Fo and Fm: Vt= (Ft -- Fo)/(Fm -- Fo) and the differences of the two samples to the control sample (ΔVt); (D) between Fo and F300 μs: WK = (Ft -- Fo)/(F300 μs-- Fo) and the differences of the two samples to the control sample (ΔWK) and (E) IP phase: (Ft -- Fo)/(FI -- Fo) -- 1 = (Ft -- FI)/(FI -- Fo) in dark-adapted sour pummelo leaves.

As shown in Fig. 3C-E, Mn-excess leaves displayed positive ΔL-, ΔK-, ΔJ- and ΔI-bands compared with controls around 130 μs, 300 μs, 2 ms and 30 ms, respectively and decreased the maximum amplitude of IP phase.

Compared with controls, Mn-excess leaves had decreased total electron carriers per reaction center (Sm or ECo/RC), reduction of end acceptors at PSI electron acceptor side per RC (REo/RC), electron transport flux per RC (ETo/RC), efficiency with which an electron can move from the reduced intersystem electron acceptors to the PSI end electron acceptors (δRo or REo/ETo), probability that a trapped exciton moves an electron into the electron transport chain beyond QA - (ψEo or ETo/TRo), maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry (φPo or Fv/Fm or TRo/ABS), quantum yield for the reduction of end acceptors of PSI per photon absorbed (φRo or REo/ABS) and total performance index (PItot,abs), but increased dissipated energy per RC (DIo/RC), trapped energy flux per RC (TRo/RC), absorption flux per RC (ABS/RC) and inactivation of oxygen evolving complex (OEC) (Fig. 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Effects of Mn-excess on Sm(ECo/RC), DIo/RC, REo/RC, ETo/RC, TRo/RC, ABS/RC, δRo (REo/ETo), ψEo (ETo/TRo), φPo (Fv/Fm or TRo/ABS), φRo (REo/ABS), PItot,abs and fraction of OEC in dark-adapted sour pummelo leaves. Each point is the mean of 9 or 10 replicates. All the values were expressed relative to the control (set as 1). All the parameters were significantly higher or lower in Mn-excess leaves than in controls.

Antioxidant enzymes and antioxidants, and malondialdehyde (MDA)

Mn-excess leaves had higher or similar APX, MDAR, GR, SOD, CAT and GPX activities whether the results were expressed on a leaf area or protein basis, while DHAR activity were lower (Fig. 5). Conversely, Mn-excess roots displayed similar or lower APX, MDAR, DHAR, GR, SOD, CAT and GPX activities, regardless of how the data were expressed (Fig. 6).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Effects of Mn-excess on activities of APX (A and H), MDAR (B and I), DHAR (C and J), GR (D and K), SOD (E and L), CAT (F and M) and GPX (G and N) of sour pummelo leaves expressed on a leaf area (A-G) or protein (H-N) basis. Bars represent means ± standard errors (n = 5-6). Different letters above standard error bars indicate significant differences at P < 0.05.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Effects of Mn-excess on activities of APX (A and H), MDAR (B and I), DHAR (C and J), GR (D and K), SOD (E and L), CAT (F and M) and GPX (G and N) of sour pummelo roots expressed on a root FW (A-G) or protein (H-N) basis. Bars represent means ± standard errors (n = 5-7). Different letters above standard error bars indicate significant differences at P < 0.05.

Mn-excess leaves showed similar contents of total ascorbate (ASC + DHA) (Fig. 7A), total glutathione (GSH + GSSG) (Fig. 7C) and GSH (Fig. 7D) on a leaf area basis and ASC on a leaf area or protein basis (Fig. 7B and 7G), but higher total ascorbate (Fig. 7F), total glutathione (Fig. 7H) and GSH (Fig. 7I) on a leaf protein basis. The ratio of GSH to total glutathione did not significantly differ between Mn-excess leaves and controls (Fig. 7J), while the ratio of ASC to total ascorbate was slightly lower in the former (Fig. 7E). There were no significant differences in the contents of total ascorbate (Fig. 8A and 8F), total glutathione (Fig. 8C and 8H) and GSH (Fig. 8D and 8I) between Mn-excess roots and controls, while the content of ASC (Fig. 8B and 8G) and the ratios of ASC/(ASC + DHA) (Fig. 8E) and GSH/(GSH + GSSG) (Fig. 8J) were significantly lower in Mn-excess roots than in controls.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Effects of Mn-excess on contents of ASC + DHA (A and F), ASC (B and G), GSH + GSSG (C and H), GSH (D and I) expressed on a leaf area (A-D) or protein (F-I) basis, and ratios of ASC to ASC + DHA (E) and GSH to GSH + GSSG (J) in sour pummelo leaves. Bars represent means ± standard errors (n = 5-8). Different letters above standard error bars indicate significant differences at P < 0.05.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Effects of Mn-excess on contents of ASC + DHA (A and F), ASC (B and G), GSH + GSSG (C and H), GSH (D and I) expressed on a root FW (A-D) or protein (F-I) basis, and ratios of ASC to ASC + DHA (E) and GSH to GSH + GSSG (J) in sour pummelo roots. Bars represent means ± standard errors (n = 5-7). Different letters above standard error bars indicate significant differences at P < 0.05.

As shown in Fig. 9, Mn-excess did not significantly affect MDA contents of roots and leaves.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Open in a new tab

Effects of Mn-excess on content of leaf MDA expressed on a leaf area (A) or FW (B) basis and of root MDA expressed on a FW basis (C) in sour pummelo seedlings. Bars represent means ± standard errors (n = 5-6). Different letters above standard error bars indicate significant differences at P < 0.05.

Discussion

The present work (Table 1), like that of previous workers [1,7,26,31] indicates that Mn-excess inhibits the plant growth. The higher ratio of root DW/shoot DW in Mn-excess plants (Table 1) agrees with the view that plant tops are affected by Mn toxicity to a greater extent than root systems [1]. However, Gherardi and Rengel [31] reported that Mn toxicity did not affect the ratio of root DW/shoot DW in lucerne (Medicago sativa L.).

The overwhelming majority of Mn was retained in the roots (Table 2), as previously found for lucerne [31]. According to Vose and Randall [32], tolerance to Mn toxicity is associated not only with low Mn uptake, but also with relatively little Mn translocation from roots to shoots. Mora et al. [33] reported that ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) cultivars tolerant to Mn-excess (Kingston and Jumbo) accumulated high Mn in roots and proportionally low Mn in shoots, while the sensitive ones (Aries and Nui) showed large Mn translocation from roots to shoots. Thus, the relatively low Mn content in upper parts of the Mn-excess plants (Table 2) might contribute to their tolerance for Mn-excess.

The lower CO2 assimilation in Mn-excess leaves (Fig. 1A) was primary caused by non-stomatal factors as the lower CO2 assimilation coincided with an increase in intercellular CO2 concentration (Fig. 1C). This agrees with the results obtained for wheat [5], tobacco [4], ricebean [8], rice [10] and cucumber [7]. However, Suresh et al. [14] concluded that Mn interfered with stomatal regulation.

Despite decreased CO2 assimilation (Fig. 1A), Mn-excess leaves had similar contents of nonstructural carbohydrates, except for a higher content of sucrose on a leaf area or DW basis and a higher content of soluble sugars on a DW basis (Fig. 2). This might result from the decreased demand for reduced C in growing sink tissues and less dilution due to growth inhibition (Table 1). However, Lidon [34] found that 2 mg L-1 Mn treatment increased the content of starch, but decreased the content of soluble carbohydrates in rice shoots. In Citrus volkameriana L., the relative volume (%) of starch grains per chloroplast was 5-fold greater under 686 μM Mn than in the treatments with 0-98 μM Mn [30]. Evidence shows that soluble sugars, specifically hexoses, may repress photosynthetic gene expression, particularly of the nuclear-encoded small sub-unit of Rubisco, thus decreasing Rubisco content and CO2 assimilation [35]. Although Mn-excess leaves had slightly increased sucrose content (Fig. 2C and 2I), the contents of glucose (Fig. 2A and 2G) and fructose (Fig. 2B and 2H) did not significantly differ between the Mn treatments. This indicated that the feedback repression mechanism via accumulation of soluble sugars did not play a major role in determining the activity of Rubisco and the rate of CO2 assimilation in Mn-excess leaves. This inference was also supported by the results that both initial and total Rubisco activity in Mn-excess decreased to a lesser extent (Fig. 1D-G) than CO2 assimilation (Fig. 1A). Therefore, decreased CO2 assimilation in Mn-excess leaves could not be attributed to a decrease in Rubisco activity.

The decrease in leaf CO2 assimilation in response to Mn-excess could not be attributed to a decrease in Chl, because there were no significant differences in the contents of Chl, Chl a and Chl b between the Mn treatments (Table 3). Mn-excess led to a slight decrease in Chl a/b ratio (Table 3), as previously found for mungbean [12]. However, Chl a/b ratio in rice leaves did not show significant changes in response to Mn toxicity [10]. Aro et al. [36] reported that there was an inverse linear relationship between the sensitivity of pea (Pisum sativum L.) leaves to photoinhibition and Chl a/b ratio. Hence, Mn-excess leaves could be more susceptible to photoinhibition in vivo compared with normal ones.

The presence of a positive ΔL-band in Mn-excess leaves (Fig. 3D) agrees with the results obtained for Al-stressed [37] and B-stressed [38] sour pummelo, N-deficient cowpea [39] and P-deficient tea [Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze] [40]. According to the Grouping Concept [41] and JIP-test [39], the positive ΔL-band in Mn-excess leaves meant that the PSII units were less grouped or less energy was being exchanged between independent PSII units. Because the grouped conformation is more stable than the ungrouped one, the decreased grouping indicated that the PSII units of Mn-excess leaves had lost their stability and become more fragile. This was also supported by our data that Mn-excess increased the heterogeneity of the samples (Fig. 3A and 3B).

Our finding that Mn-excess leaves had a lower maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry (φPo or Fv/Fm or TRo/ABS) (Fig. 4) indicated that photoinhibitory damage to PSII complexes occurred in Mn-excess leaves [42,43]. Similar results have been obtained for cucumber [7] and Mn-sensitive maize [16]. However, Mn-induced decrease in CO2 assimilation was unaccompanied by decreased Fv/Fm in ricebean [8], white birch [9], rice [10], Alnus hirsuta Turcz., Betula ermanii Charm., Ulmus davidiana Planch. and Acer mono Maxim. [13]. The decrease in Fv/Fm was due to an increase in Fo and a decrease in Fm (Fig. 3A and 3B), as previously found for Al-treated [37] and B-deficient [38] sour pummelo and P-deficient tea [40]. The higher Fo might be caused by the damage of OEC, because Mn-excess leaves had increased inactivation (Fig. 4), or it might relate to the accumulation of reduced QA [44], because the physiological fractional reduction of QA to QA -, as indicated by the increase in approximated initial slope (in ms-1) of the fluorescence transient V = f(t) [Mo = 4 (F300 μs - Fo)/(Fm - Fo)] (Fig. 3C), increased in Mn-excess leaves. Quenching of Fm in Mn-excess leaves might arise from the photoinhibitory quenching (qI), because an increase in Fo with a quenched Fm was observed in Mn-excess leaves (Fig. 3A and 3B) [45].

The Mn-induced positive ΔK-band in the OJIP transient is in agreement with the results obtained for Al-treated [37] and B-stressed [38] sour pummelo, and chromate (Cr)-treated Lemna gibba L. [46] and Spirodela polyrhiza (L.) Schleid. [47]. This indicated that the OEC was damaged and the energetic connectivity between photosynthetic units was changed [48]. This was also supported by the data that Mn-excess leaves had increased inactivation of OEC (Fig. 4) and less energy exchange between independent PSII units, as indicated by the positive ΔL-band (Fig. 3D). The fraction of electrons from the RCs at the acceptor side relates not only to the capacity of electron donation to the RCs, but also to the electron transport capacity from RCs to electron acceptors. The Mn-induced positive ΔI-band (Fig. 3C) indicated that the acceptor side of PSII in Mn-excess leaves was damaged more severely than the donor side of PSII, as previous suggest from in vitro studies that inactivation of the acceptor side might be the main mechanism underlying impairment of electron transport [36]. This was also supported by our data that Mn-excess leaves displayed a higher Fo compared with controls (Fig. 3A and 3B). If the acceptor side of PSII is photoinhibited, the Fo is significantly increased [49]. Relative variable fluorescence (VI) is a derived parameter and its increase can be due to an increase in FI or a decrease in Fm, or both. Because Mn-excess leaves had lower FI and Fm compared with controls (Fig. 3A and 3B), the increased VI in Mn-excess leaves might indicate a relative change in the proportion of QB-non-reducing PSII RCs rather than an increase in the absolute amount of the QB-non-reducing PSII RCs [37]. It has been suggested that the amplitude of IP phase is a measure of the amount of reduced end acceptors at PSI acceptor side and that the IP phase represents the last and slowest rate-limiting step of the photosynthetic electron transport chain [50]. Our results showed that Mn-excess largely decreased the maximum amplitude of IP phase (Fig. 3E). In addition, Mn-excess leaves had decreased Sm (ECo/RC), REo/RC, ETo/RC, δRo (REo/ETo), ψEo (ETo/TRo) and φRo (REo/ABS), and increased DIo/RC, TRo/RC and ABS/RC, and damaged all of the photochemical and non-photochemical redox reactions, as indicated by the decreases in the total performance index (PItot,abs) (Fig. 4). Therefore, we concluded that Mn-excess impaired the whole photosynthetic electron transport chain from the donor side of PSII up to the reduction of end acceptors of PSI, thus limiting the production of reducing equivalents, and hence the rate of CO2 assimilation.

Since CO2 assimilation was decreased in Mn-excess leaves (Fig. 1A), only a fraction of the absorbed light energy was used in photosynthetic electron transport. Correspondingly, energy dissipation, as indicated by DIo/RC (Fig. 4), increased in Mn-excess leaves. The excess absorbed photon flux can also potentially lead to the production of ROS [51]. In addition, heavy metals have been demonstrated to stimulate formation of ROS in roots and leaves [7,52]. Thus, the production of ROS might be enhanced in Mn-excess roots and leaves. When the production of ROS is stimulated by stress, some protective antioxidant enzymes and antioxidants may be affected in plants. On a protein basis, Mn-excess leaves had higher or similar activities of antioxidant enzymes and contents of antioxidants, except for a lower activity of DHAR (Figs. 5H-N and 7F-I). The up-regulation of some antioxidant enzymes has also been found in the leaves of cucumber [7,25] and common bean [24] plants. In contrast to the leaf antioxidant enzymes and antioxidants, Mn-excess roots had similar or lower activities of antioxidant enzymes and contents of antioxidants on a protein basis (Figs. 6H-N and 8F-I). Our results clearly showed that on a protein basis, only DHAR activity in roots and leaves was decreased by excess Mn (Figs. 5H-N and 6H-N). Considering that the DHAR activity was the lowest among the enzymes in the ascorbate-glutathione cycle, it was likely that the DHAR-catalyzed reaction was not the main route for the regeneration. Previous studies showed that the ratios of ASC to ASC + DHA and GSH to GSH + GSSG decreased under oxidative stress [53-55]. In our study, the ratio of ASC to ASC + DHA was slightly lower in Mn-excess leaves than in controls (Fig. 7E), while Mn-excess did not significantly affect the ratio of GSH to GSH + GSSG (Fig. 7J). By contrast to leaves, the ratio of ASC to ASC + DHA was much lower in Mn-excess roots than in controls (Fig. 8E), while Mn-excess only slightly decreased the ratio of GSH to GSH + GSSG (Fig. 8J). Similar MDA content in roots and leaves between the Mn treatments (Fig. 9) indicated that the antioxidant systems in Mn-excess roots and leaves provided considerable protection to them against oxidative damage. Thus, the decrease in ASC/(ASC + DHA) ratio in Mn-excess roots and leaves (Figs. 7E and 8E) and GSH/(GSH + GSSG) ratio in Mn-excess roots (Fig. 8J) might indicate the equilibrium between utilization and regeneration of ASC and GSH was achieved at lower levels of ASC and GSH in the pool, and did not necessarily imply the Mn-excess roots and leaves were damaged by oxidative stress. Therefore, decreased CO2 assimilation in Mn-excess leaves could not be attributed to oxidative damage.

Conclusions

Mn-excess impaired the whole photosynthetic electron transport chain from the donor side of PSII up to the reduction of end acceptors of PSI, thus limiting the production of reducing equivalents, and hence the rate of CO2 assimilation. Both the energy dissipation and the antioxidant systems were up-regulated in Mn-excess leaves, while the antioxidant systems in Mn-excess roots were not enhanced, but still remained high activity. The antioxidant systems in Mn-excess roots and leaves provided considerable protection to them against oxidative damage.

Methods

Plant culture and Mn treatments

This study was conducted outdoors from April to November, 2008 at Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (FAFU). Seeds of sour pummelo [Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck] were germinated in sand in plastic trays. Six weeks after germination, uniform seedlings with a single stem were selected and transplanted to 6 L pots containing sand. Seedlings, three to a pot, were grown outdoors at FAFU. Each pot was supplied with 500 mL of nutrient solution every two days. The nutrient solution contained the following macronutrients (in mM): KNO3, 1.25; Ca(NO3)2, 1; (NH4)H2PO4, 0.25; MgSO4, 0.5; micronutrients (in μM): H3BO3, 10; MnSO4, 2; ZnCl2, 2; CuSO4, 0.5; (NH4)6Mo7O24, 0.065; and Fe-EDTA, 20. Ten weeks after transplanting the treatment was applied for 17 weeks: until the end of the experiment, each pot was supplied every other day until dripping with nutrient solution (approx. 500 mL) containing 2 μM (control) or 500 μM (excess) MnSO4. At the end of the experiment, fully-expanded (about 7 weeks old) leaves from different replicates and treatments were used for all the measurements. Leaf discs (0.58 cm2 in size) were collected at noon under full sun and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Approximately 10-mm-long root apices were excised from the same seedlings used for sampling leaves and frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen. Both leaf and root samples were stored at -80°C until extraction.

Measurements of root, stem and leaf DW, and specific leaf weight

At the end of the experiment, 10 plants per treatment from different pots were harvested. The plants were divided into their separate parts (roots, stems and leaves). The plant material was then dried at 80°C for 48 h and the DW measured. Specific leaf weight was measured according to Syvertsen et al. [56].

Determination of pigments, total soluble protein, and Mn

Leaf Chl, Chl a, Chl b, and Car were assayed according to Lichtenthaler [57]. Briefly, 2 frozen leaf discs were extracted with 8 mL of 80% (v/v) acetone for 24 h in the dark. The extracts were determined using Libra S22 ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer (Biochrom Ltd., Cambridge, UK). Root and leaf total soluble protein was extracted with 50 mM Na2HPO4-KH2PO4 (pH 7.0) and 5% (w/v) insoluble polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP), and determined according to Bradford [58] using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as standard. Mn content in roots, stems and leaves was determined by atomic absorption spectroscopy after digested with 1 N HCl.

Leaf gas exchange measurements

Measurements were made with a CIARS-2 portable photosynthesis system (PP systems, Herts, UK) at ambient CO2 concentration under a controlled light intensity of 1000 μmol m-2 s-1 between 9:30 and 10:30 on a clear day. During measurements, leaf temperature and vapor pressure deficit (VPD) were 26.9 ± 1.1°C and 2.0 ± 0.1 kPa, respectively.

Leaf Rubisco activity measurements

Rubisco was extracted according to Chen et al. [59]. Two frozen leaf discs from the same leaf were ground with a pre-cooled mortar and pestle in 1 mL of extraction buffer containing 50 mM Hepes-KOH (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl2, 2 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 10 mM dithiothreitol (DDT), 1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 5% (w/v) insoluble PVPP, 1% (w/v) BSA, 10% (v/v) glycerol. The extract was centrifuged at 13 000 g for 40 s in 2°C, and the supernatant was used immediately for the assay of Rubisco activity. Rubisco activity was determined according to Lin et al. [40]. For initial activity, 50 μL of sample extract was added to a cuvette containing 900 μL of assay solution, immediately followed by adding 50 μL of 10 mM ribulose-1,5-biphosphate (RuBP), then mixing well. The change of absorbance at 340 nm was monitored for 40 s. For total activity, 50 μL of 10 mM RuBP was added 15 min later, after 50 μL of sample extract was combined with 900 μL of assay solution to fully activate all the Rubisco. The assay solution for both initial and total activity measurements, whose final volume was 1 mL, contained 100 mM Hepes-KOH (pH 8.0), 25 mM KHCO3, 20 mM MgCl2, 3.5 mM ATP, 5 mM phosphocretaine, 5 units of NAD-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (NAD-GAPDH, EC 1.2.1.12), 5 units of 3-phosphoglyceric phospokinase (PCK, EC 2.7.2.3), 17.5 units of creatine phosphokinase (EC 2.7.3.2), 0.25 mM NADH, 0.5 mM RuBP, and 50 μL of sample extract. Rubisco activation state was calculated as the ratio of initial activity to total activity.

Assay of leaf nonstructural carbohydrates

Sucrose, fructose, glucose and starch were extracted and assayed according to Chen and Cheng [60].

Measurements of leaf OJIP transients

OJIP transient was measured by a Handy Plant Efficiency Analyzer (Handy PEA, Hansatech Instruments Limited, Norfolk, UK) according to Strasser et al. [61]. All the measurements were done with 3 h dark-adapted plants at room temperature.

OJIP transient was analyzed according to the JIP test [37,38,62,63]. The following data from the original measurements were used: the fluorescence intensity at 20 μs (considered as minimum fluorescence Fo); the maximal fluorescence intensity, FP, equal to Fm since the excitation intensity was high enough to ensure the closure of all RCs of PSII; the fluorescence intensity at 300 μs (F300μs), 2 ms (J-step, FJ) and 30 ms (I-step, FI). The JIP test represents a translation of the original data to biophysical parameters and the performance index. The following parameters that all refer to time 0 (start of fluorescence induction) are: (a) relative variable fluorescence at the J-step [VJ = (FJ - Fo)/(Fm - Fo)] and at the I-step [VI = (FI - Fo)/(Fm - Fo)]; (b) normalized total complementary area above the OJIP transient or total electron carriers per RC (Sm = ECo/RC) and the fraction of OEC in comparison with control [(1-VK/VJ)treated sample/(1-VK/VJ)control, where VK is the relative variable fluorescence at 300 μs]; (c) the specific energy fluxes per RC for absorption (ABS/RC), trapping (TRo/RC), electron transport (ETo/RC), dissipation (DIo/RC) and reduction of end acceptors at PSI acceptor side (REo/RC); (d) the flux ratios or yields, i.e. the maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry (φPo = TRo/ABS = Fv/Fm), the probability that a trapped exciton moves an electron into the electron transport chain beyond QA - (ψEo = ETo/TRo), the quantum yield for the reduction of end acceptors of PSI per photon absorbed (φRo = REo/ABS) and the efficiency with which an electron can move from the reduced intersystem electron acceptors to the PSI end electron acceptors (δRo = REo/ETo); (e) the total performance index (PItot,abs), measuring the performance up to the PSI end electron acceptors (PItot,abs = (RC/ABS) × (φPo/(1- φPo)) × (ψEo/(1 - ψEo)) × (δRo/(1 - δRo)); (f) the IP phase (IP phase = (Ft - Fo)/(FI - Fo) - 1 = (Ft - FI)/(FI - Fo), where Ft is the fluorescence intensity at time t after onset of actinic illumination.

Extended analysis of OJIP transients was done by calculation of the relative variable fluorescence [37,63]: (A) between Fo and Fm [Vt = (Ft - Fo)/(Fm - Fo)] and (B) between Fo and F300 μs [WK = (Ft - Fo)/(F300 μs- Fo)] and the differences between the treated and the control samples. Clear bands are visible in these transients, where treatments rise above the control transient which is the reference line. Positive ΔL-, ΔK-, ΔJ- and ΔI-bands appear around 130 μs, 300 μs, 2 ms and 30 ms, respectively, and are associated with the ungrouping of PSII units [41], the uncoupling of OEC [64], the accumulation of QA - [39] and the increased proportion of QB-non-reducing PSII RCs [65,66], respectively.

Antioxidant enzymes, antioxidants and MDA in leaves and roots

GPX, SOD, APX, MDAR, DHAR, GR and CAT in roots and leaves were extracted according to Chen and Cheng [51]. GPX was assayed at 470 nm (extinction coefficient 25.2 mM-1 cm-1) in 1 mL of reaction mixture containing 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0), 16 mM guaiacol, 5 μL of 10% (v/v) H2O2 and the enzyme extract. The reaction was started by adding the enzyme extract [67]. SOD activity was assayed according to Giannopolitis and Rice [68]. APX, CAT, MDAR, DHAR and GR were measured according to Chen and Cheng [51].

Frozen leaf discs or roots were ground in ice-cold 5% (w/v) TCA [49]. GSH and GSSG in the extract were determined according to Griffith [69]. Frozen leaf discs or roots were ground in ice-cold 6% (v/v) HClO4. ASC and DHA in the extract were measured according to Chen and Cheng [51]. MDA was extracted with 80% (v/v) ethanol and determined according to Hodges et al. [70].

Experimental design and statistical analysis

There were 20 pots seedlings per treatment in a completely randomized design. Experiments were performed with 4 -10 replicates (one plant from different pots per replicate). Results represented the means ± standard errors. Unpaired t-test was applied for comparison between two means at P < 0.05 level.

Abbreviations

APX: ascorbate peroxidase; ASC: ascorbate; Car: carotenoids; CAT: catalase; Chl: chlorophyll; DHA: dehydroascorbate; DHAR: dehydroascorbate reductase; DW: dry weight; ETo/TRo: probability (at time 0) that a trapped exciton moves an electron into the electron transport chain beyond QA -; Fo: minimum fluorescence; FW: fresh weight; GPX: guaiacol peroxidase; GR: glutathione reductase; GSH: reduced glutathione; GSSG: oxidized glutathione; MDA: malondialdehyde; MDAR: monodehydroascorbate reductase; Mn: manganese; OJIP: Chl a fluorescence; PItot,abs: total performance index; RC: reaction center; REo/ABS: quantum yield of electron transport from QA - to the PSI end electron acceptors; REo/ETo: efficiency with which an electron can move from the reduced intersystem electron acceptors to the PSI end electron acceptors; ROS: reactive oxygen species; Rubisco: ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase; RuBP: ribulose- 1,5-bisphosphate; SOD: superoxide dismutase; TNC: total nonstructural carbohydrates; TRo/ABS or Fv/Fm: maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry at t = 0; VI: relative variable fluorescence at the I-step; VJ: relative variable fluorescence at the J-step.

Authors' contributions

QL performed most of the experiments and wrote the manuscript. LSC designed and directed the study and revised the manuscript. HXJ, NT, LTY, ZHL and GHY helped in measuring Rubisco activity and OJIP transients. YL helped in assaying Mn content. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Contributor Information

Qing Li, Email: liqing76@gmail.com.

Li-Song Chen, Email: lisongchen2002@hotmail.com.

Huan-Xin Jiang, Email: jianghx@163.com.

Ning Tang, Email: sabrina-0810@hotmail.com.

Lin-Tong Yang, Email: talstoy@sina.com.

Zheng-He Lin, Email: linzhenghe@126.com.

Yan Li, Email: liyan1@pub3.fz.fj.cn.

Gang-Hua Yang, Email: ganghuayang@163.com.

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the Agricultural Commonweal Industrial Special Fund Program of Department of Agriculture, China (No. nyhyzx07-023).

References

  1. Mukhopadhyay MJ, Sharma A. Manganese in cell metabolism of higher plants. Bot Rev. 1991;57:117–149. doi: 10.1007/BF02858767. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Foy CD. In: Soil Acidity and Liming. 2. Adams F, editor. Madison: American Society of Agronomy; 1984. Physiological effects of hydrogen, aluminum, and manganese toxicities in acid soils; pp. 57–97. [Google Scholar]
  3. Houtz R, Nable RO, Cheniae GM. Evidence for effects on the in vivo activity of ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase during development of Mn toxicity in tobacco. Plant Physiol. 1988;86:1143–1149. doi: 10.1104/pp.86.4.1143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Nable RO, Houtz RL, Cheniae GM. Early inhibition of photosynthesis during development of Mn toxicity in tobacco. Plant Physiol. 1988;86:1136–1142. doi: 10.1104/pp.86.4.1136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ohki K. Manganese deficiency and toxicity effects on photosynthesis, chlorophyll, and transpiration in wheat. Crop Sci. 1985;25:187–191. [Google Scholar]
  6. Macfie SM, Taylor GJ. The effects of excess manganese on photosynthetic rate and concentration of chlorophyll in Triticum aestivum grown in solution culture. Physiol Plant. 1992;85:467–475. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1992.tb05813.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Feng J-P, Shi Q-H, Wang X-F. Effects of exogenous silicon on photosynthetic capacity and antioxidant enzyme activities in chloroplast of cucumber seedlings under excess manganese. Agri Sci China. 2009;8:40–50. [Google Scholar]
  8. Subrahmanyam D, Rathore VS. Influence of manganese toxicity on photosynthesis in rice bean seedlings. Photosynthetica. 2000;38:425–429. doi: 10.1023/A:1026756210347. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kitao M, Lei TT, Koike T. Effects of manganese toxicity on photosynthesis of white birch (Betula platyphylla var. japonica) seedlings. Physiol Plant. 1997;101:249–256. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb00994.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lidon FC, Barreiro MG, Ramalho JC. Manganese accumulation in rice: implications for photosynthetic functioning. J Plant Physiol. 2004;161:1235–1244. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2004.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. González A, Lynch JP. Effects of manganese toxicity on leaf CO2 assimilation of contrasting common bean genotypes. Physiol Plant. 1997;101:872–880. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb01076.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sinha S, Mukherji S, Dutta J. Effect of manganese toxicity on pigment content, Hill activity and photosynthetic rate of Vigna radiata L. Wilczek seedlings. J Environ Biol. 2002;23:253–257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kitao M, Lei TT, Koike T. Comparison of photosynthetic responses to manganese toxicity of deciduous broad-leaved trees in northern Japan. Environ Pollut. 1997;97:113–118. doi: 10.1016/S0269-7491(97)00064-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Suresh R, Foy CD, Weidner JR. Effects of excess soil manganese on stomatal function in two soybean cultivars. J Plant Nutr. 1987;10:749–760. doi: 10.1080/01904168709363606. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chatterjee C, Nautiyal N, Agarwala SC. Influence of changes in manganese and magnesium supply on some aspects of wheat physiology. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 1994;40:191–197. [Google Scholar]
  16. Doncheva S, Poschenrieder C, Stoyanova Z, Georgieva K, Velichkova M, Barceló J. Silicon amelioration of manganese toxicity in Mn-sensitive and Mn-tolerant maize varieties. Environ Exp Bot. 2009;65:189–197. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2008.11.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Panda S, Mishra AK, Biswal UC. Manganese induced peroxidation of thylakoid lipids and changes in chlorophyll a fluorescence during aging of cell free chloroplasts in light. Phytochemistry. 1989;26:3217–3219. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)82472-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. St Clair SB, Lynch JP. Photosynthetic and antioxidant enzyme responses of sugar maple and red maple seedlings to excess manganese in contrasting light environments. Funct Plant Bio. 2004;31:1005–1014. doi: 10.1071/FP04049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lynch JP, St Clair SB. Mineral stress: the missing link in understanding how global climate change will affect plants in real world soils. Field Crops Res. 2004;90:101–115. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2004.07.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Boojar MMA, Goodarzi F. Comparative evaluation of oxidative stress status and manganese availability in plants growing on manganese mine. Ecotox Environ Safe. 2008;71:692–699. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Demirevska-Kepova K, Simova-Stoilova L, Stoyanova Z, Holzer R, Feller U. Biochemical changes in barley plants after excessive supply of copper and manganese. Environ Exp Bot. 2004;52:253–266. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.02.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Chen L-S, Qi Y-P, Liu X-H. Effects of aluminum on light energy utilization and photoprotective systems in citrus leaves. Ann Bot. 2005;96:35–41. doi: 10.1093/aob/mci145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shi Q-H, Zhu Z-J, Li J, Qian Q-Q. Combined Effects of excess Mn and low pH on oxidative stress and antioxidant enzymes in cucumber roots. Agr Sci China. 2006;5:767–772. [Google Scholar]
  24. González A, Steffen KL, Lynch JP. Light and excess manganese: implications for oxidative stress in common bean. Plant Physiol. 1998;118:493–504. doi: 10.1104/pp.118.2.493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Shi Q, Bao Z, Zhu Z, He Y, Qian Q, Yu J. Silicon-mediated alleviation of Mn toxicity in Cucumis sativus in relation to the activities of superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase. Phytochemistry. 2005;166:1551–1559. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2005.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Shi Q, Zhu Z. Effects of exogenous salicylic acid on manganese toxicity, element contents and antioxidative system in cucumber. Environ Exp Bot. 2008;63:317–326. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.11.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Cuypers A, Vangronsveld J, Clijsters H. The redox status of plant cells (AsA and GSH) is sensitive to zinc imposed oxidative stress in roots and primary leaves of Phaseolus vulgaris. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2001;39:657–664. doi: 10.1016/S0981-9428(01)01276-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Yannarelli GG, Fernández-Alvarez AJ, Santa-Cruz DM, Tomaro ML. Glutathione reductase activity and isoforms in leaves and roots of wheat plants subjected to cadmium stress. Phytochemistry. 2007;68:505–512. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhang F-Q, Wang Y-S, Lou Z-P, Dong J-D. Effect of heavy metal stress on antioxidative enzymes and lipid peroxidation in leaves and roots of two mangrove plant seedlings (Kandelia candel and Bruguiera gymnorrhiza) Chemosphere. 2007;67:44–50. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Papadakis IE, Giannakoula A, Therios IN, Bosabalidis AM, Moustakas M, Nastou A. Mn-induced changes in leaf structure and chloroplast ultrastructure of Citrus volkameriana (L.) plants. J Plant Physiol. 2007;164:100–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2006.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Gherardi MJ, Rengel Z. Genotypes of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) show differential tolerance to manganese deficiency and toxicity when grown in bauxite residue sand. Plant Soil. 2003;249:287–296. doi: 10.1023/A:1022872524844. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Vose PB, Randall PJ. Resistance to aluminum and manganese toxicities in plants related to variety and cation exchange capacity. Nature. 1962;196:85–86. doi: 10.1038/196085a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mora ML, Rosas A, Ribera A, Rengel Z. Differential tolerance to Mn toxicity in perennial ryegrass genotypes: involvement of antioxidative enzymes and root exudation of carboxylates. Plant Soil. 2009;320:79–89. doi: 10.1007/s11104-008-9872-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lidon FC. Lipid, carbohydrate, and protein accumulation in Mn-treated rice. J Plant Nutr. 2002;25:769–780. doi: 10.1081/PLN-120002958. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sheen J. Feedback control of gene expression. Photosynth Res. 1994;39:427–438. doi: 10.1007/BF00014596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Aro E-M, McCaffery S, Anderson JM. Photoinhibition and D1 protein degradation in peas acclimated to different growth irradiances. Plant Physiol. 1993;103:835–843. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.3.835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jiang H-X, Chen L-S, Zheng J-G, Han S, Tang N, Smith BR. Aluminum-induced effects on Photosystem II photochemistry in citrus leaves assessed by the chlorophyll a fluorescence transient. Tree Physiol. 2008;28:1863–1871. doi: 10.1093/treephys/28.12.1863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Han S, Tang N, Jiang H-X, Yang L-T, Li Y, Chen L-S. CO2 assimilation, photosystem II photochemistry, carbohydrate metabolism and antioxidant system of citrus leaves in response to boron stress. Plant Sci. 2009;176:143–153. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.10.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Strasser RJ, Tsimilli-Micheal M, Srivastava A. In: Chlorophyll a Fluorescence: A Signature of Photosynthesis. Papageorgiou GC, Govindjee, editor. Dordrecht: Springer; 2004. Analysis of the chlorophyll a fluorescence transient; pp. 321–362. [Govindjee (Series Editor): Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration, vol. 19.] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lin Z-H, Chen L-S, Chen R-B, Zhang F-Z, Jiang H-X, Tang N. CO2 assimilation, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase, carbohydrates and photosynthetic electron transport probed by the JIP-test, of tea leaves in response to phosphorus supply. BMC Plant Biol. 2009;9:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-9-43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Strasser RJ. In: Chloroplast Development. Akoyunoglou G, editor. Dordrecht: Elsevier; 1978. The grouping model of plant photosynthesis; pp. 513–524. [Google Scholar]
  42. Maxwell K, Johnson GN. Chlorophyll fluorescence - a practical guide. J Exp Bot. 2000;51:659–668. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Baker NR, Rosenqvist E. Applications of chlorophyll fluorescence can improve crop production strategies: An examination of future possibilities. J Exp Bot. 2004;55:1607–1621. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Bukhov NG, Sabat SC, Mohanty P. Analysis of chlorophyll a fluorescence changes in weak light in heat treated Amarenthus chloroplasts. Photosynth Res. 1990;23:81–87. doi: 10.1007/BF00030066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Gilmore AM, Hazlett TL, Debrunner PG, Govindjee. Comparative time-resolved photosystem II chlorophyll a fluorescence analyses reveal distinctive differences between photoinhibitory reaction center damage and xanthophyll cycle-dependent energy dissipation. Photochem Photobiol. 1996;64:552–563. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1996.tb03105.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ali NA, Dewez D, Didur O, Popovic R. Inhibition of photosystem II photochemistry by Cr is caused by the alteration of both D1 protein and oxygen evolving complex. Photosynth Res. 2006;89:81–87. doi: 10.1007/s11120-006-9085-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Susplugas S, Srivastava A, Strasser RJ. Changes in the photosynthetic activities during several stages of vegetative growth of Spirodela polyrhiza : effect of chromate. J Plant Physiol. 2000;157:503–512. [Google Scholar]
  48. Srivastava A, Guisse B, Greppin H, Strasser RJ. Regulation of antenna structure and electron transport in Photosystem II of Pisum sativum under elevated temperature probed by the fast polyphasic chlorophyll a fluorescence transient: OKJIP. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997;1320:95–106. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2728(97)00017-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Setlik I, Allakhverdiev SI, Nedbal L, Setlikova E, Klimov VV. Three types of photosystem II photoinactivation. 1. Damaging processes on the acceptor side. Photosynth Res. 1990;23:39–48. doi: 10.1007/BF00030061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Schansker G, Tüth SZ, Strasser RJ. Methylviologen and dibromothymoquinone treatments of pea leaves reveal the role of photosystem I in the Chl a fluorescence rise OJIP. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1706:250–261. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2004.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Chen L-S, Cheng L. Both xanthophyll cycle-dependent thermal dissipation and the antioxidant system are up-regulated in grape (Vitis labrusca L. cv. Concord) leaves in response to N limitation. J Exp Bot. 2003;54:2165–2175. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erg220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Rucińska R, Waplak S, Gwóźdź EA. Free radical formation and activity of antioxidant enzymes in lupin roots exposed to lead. Plant Physiol Biochem. 1999;37:187–194. doi: 10.1016/S0981-9428(99)80033-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Chen L-S, Cheng L. CO2 assimilation, carbohydrate metabolism, xanthophyll cycle and the antioxidant system of 'Honeycrisp' apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) leaves with zonal chlorosis. J Amer Soc Hort Sci. 2004;129:729–737. [Google Scholar]
  54. Law MY, Charles SA, Halliwell B. Glutathione and ascorbic acid in spinach (Spinacia oleracea) chloroplasts: the effect of hydrogen peroxide and of paraquat. Biochem J. 1983;210:899–903. doi: 10.1042/bj2100899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Gossett DR, Millhollon EP, Lucas MC. Antioxidant responses to NaCl stress in salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive cultivars of cotton. Crop Sci. 1994;34:706–714. [Google Scholar]
  56. Syvertsen JP, Bausher MG, Albrigo LG. Water relations and related characteristics of healthy and blight affected citrus trees. J Amer Soc Hort Sci. 1980;105:431–434. [Google Scholar]
  57. Lichtenthaler HK. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods Enzymol. 1987;148:350–382. full_text. [Google Scholar]
  58. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Chen L-S, Qi Y-P, Smith BR, Liu XH. Aluminum-induced decrease in CO2 assimilation in citrus seedlings is unaccompanied by decreased activities of key enzymes involved in CO2 assimilation. Tree Physiol. 2005;25:317–324. doi: 10.1093/treephys/25.3.317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Chen L-S, Cheng L. Carbon assimilation and carbohydrate metabolism of 'Concord' grape leaves in responses to nitrogen supply. J Amer Soc Hort Sci. 2003;128:754–760. [Google Scholar]
  61. Strasser RJ, Srivastava A, Govindjee. Polyphasic chlorophyll a fluorescence transient in plants and cyanobacteria. Photochem Photobiol. 1995;61:32–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1995.tb09240.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Tsimilli-Michael M, Strasser RJ. In: Mycorrhiza: Genetics and Molecular Biology, Eco-function, Biotechnology, Eco-physiology, and Structure and Systematics. Varma A, editor. Berlin: Springer; 2008. In vivo assessment of stress impact on plant's vitality: applications in detecting and evaluating the beneficial role of mycorrhization on host plants; pp. 679–703. [Google Scholar]
  63. Smit MF, van Heerden PDR, Pienaar JJ, Weissflog L, Strasser RJ, Krüger GHJ. Effect of trifluoroacetate, a persistent degradation product of fluorinated hydrocarbons, on Phaseolus vulgaris and Zea mays. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2009;47:623–634. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Strasser BJ. Donor side capacity of photosystem II probed by chlorophyll a fluorescence transients. Photosynth Res. 1997;52:147–155. doi: 10.1023/A:1005896029778. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Chylla R, Whitmarsh J. Inactive photosystem II complexes in leaves. Plant Physiol. 1989;90:765–772. doi: 10.1104/pp.90.2.765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Cao J, Govindjee. Chlorophyll a fluorescence transient as an indicator of active and inactive photosystem II in thylakiod membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1990;1015:180–188. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(90)90018-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Chen L-S, Li P, Cheng L. Effects of high temperature coupled with high light on the balance between photooxidation and photoprotection in the sun-exposed peel of apple. Planta. 2008;228:745–756. doi: 10.1007/s00425-008-0776-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Giannopolitis CN, Rice SK. Superoxide dimutase: occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiol. 1977;59:309–314. doi: 10.1104/pp.59.2.309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Griffith OW. Determination of glutathione and glutathione disulfide using glutathione reductase and 2-vinylpyridine. Anal Biochem. 1980;106:207–212. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(80)90139-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Hodges DM, DeLong JM, Forney CF, Prange RK. Improving the thiobarbituric acid-reactive-substances assay for estimating lipid peroxidation in plant tissues containing anthocyanin and other interfering compounds. Planta. 1999;207:604–611. doi: 10.1007/s004250050524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMC Plant Biology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES