Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1969 May;98(2):749–755. doi: 10.1128/jb.98.2.749-755.1969

Effects of Antibiotics on Induction, Viability, and Reversion Potential of L-Forms of Haemophilus influenzae

E M Lapinski 1, E D Flakas 1
PMCID: PMC284881  PMID: 5305776

Abstract

L-form variants of Haemophilus influenzae were found to be more susceptible than their parent bacilli to streptomycin, kanamycin, tetracycline, erythromycin, and chloramphenicol if L-form inducer, penicillin, was present. This greater susceptibility was defined as the bactericidal effect for the variant forms of a concentration of antibiotic that is lower than but approximates the level bacteriostatic for the parents. In the absence of penicillin, reversion to and growth as bacilli occurred, although kanamycin, chloramphenicol, and erythromycin were lethal for round-body inocula on antibiotic reversion media in a few instances. The development of round bodies from bacillary inocula on induction medium was inhibited by bacteriostatic concentrations of chloramphenicol or tetracycline. The bacilli survived for 72 hr or more, whereas round bodies were dead within 24 hr.

Full text

PDF
749

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Lapinski E. M., Flakas E. D. Induction of L forms of Haemophilus influenzae in culture and their demonstration in human bronchial secretions. J Bacteriol. 1967 Apr;93(4):1438–1445. doi: 10.1128/jb.93.4.1438-1445.1967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. MILES C. P., COLEMAN V. R., GUNNISON J. B., JAWETZ E. Antibiotic synergism requires simultaneous presence of both members of a synergistic drug pair. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1951 Dec;78(3):738–741. doi: 10.3181/00379727-78-19201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Montgomerie J. Z., Kalmanson G. M., Guze L. B. The effects of antibiotics on the protoplast and bacterial forms of Streptococcus faecalis. J Lab Clin Med. 1966 Oct;68(4):543–551. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Montgomerie J. Z., Kalmanson G. M., Hewitt W. L., Guze L. B. Effectiveness of antibiotics against the bacterial and "protoplast" phases of pyelonephritis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (Bethesda) 1965;5:427–430. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. PLOTZ P. H., DAVIS B. D. Synergism between streptomycin and penicillin: a proposed mechanism. Science. 1962 Mar 23;135(3508):1067–1068. doi: 10.1126/science.135.3508.1067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Roberts R. B. L form of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Bacteriol. 1966 Dec;92(6):1609–1614. doi: 10.1128/jb.92.6.1609-1614.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. TAUBENECK U. Susceptibility of Proteus mirabilis and its stable L-forms to erythromycin and other macrolides. Nature. 1962 Oct 13;196:195–196. doi: 10.1038/196195b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. WARD J. R., MADOFF S., DIENES L. In vitro sensitivity of some bacteria, their L forms and pleuropneumonia-like organisms to antibiotics. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1958 Jan;97(1):132–135. doi: 10.3181/00379727-97-23667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES