Abstract
Objective: To examine the possibility that low birth weight is a feature of the inherited predisposition to high blood pressure.
Design: Cross sectional study.
Setting: Primary care medical centre in Edinburgh.
Subjects: One offspring of 452 families (231 men and 221 women aged 16-26 years) in whom blood pressure, weight, and height were measured in 1986 and whose parents had blood pressure measured in 1979. Birth weights were obtained from case records (270 offspring) or by questionnaires sent to the mothers (182 offspring).
Main outcome measures: Birth weight and adult systolic blood pressure in offspring in relation to parental blood pressure.
Results: If parental blood pressures were not considered, a 1 kg decrease in birth weight was associated with a 2.24 mm Hg increase in systolic blood pressure of offspring (P=0.06) after correction for current weight and sex. However, parental blood pressures correlated positively with blood pressure of offspring, and higher maternal blood pressure was associated with lower birth weight (−3.03 g/mm Hg, P<0.01). After correction for parental blood pressures, a 1 kg decrease in birth weight was associated with only a 1.71 mm Hg increase in the systolic blood pressure of the offspring (P=0.15).
Conclusions: Low birth weight is a feature of the inherited predisposition to hypertension, perhaps because it is associated with higher maternal blood pressure during pregnancy. Parental blood pressure may be an important confounding factor in the relation between low birth weight and subsequent hypertension.
Key messages
Hypertension has both inherited and environmental causes
The relation between low birth weight and hypertension in later life may result from the mother’s nutritional environment during pregnancy
This study found that mothers who have higher blood pressure in later life deliver babies with lower birth weight, who also develop higher blood pressure
Hereditary factors therefore explain part of the relation between low birth weight and adult hypertension
Introduction
During the past decade a series of epidemiological studies in several countries has documented that babies of low birth weight have higher blood pressure as children and adults.1–3 These relations are maintained after correction for gestational age at birth or other influences on blood pressure in later life, including obesity, socioeconomic group, and alcohol consumption. The association between low birth weight and subsequent hypertension may be explained by inadequate fetal nutrition during pregnancy, resulting either from inadequate maternal nutrition or placental dysfunction.4 Fetal adaptations to undernutrition are thought to programme permanent changes in factors that influence blood pressure in later life, including cortisol, growth factors, and insulin.4 This model is supported by experiments in animals, in which manipulations in utero, including maternal undernutrition5 and treatment with glucocorticoids,6 result in lower birth weight, raised blood pressure, and hormonal abnormalities in the adult offspring.
Both blood pressure7 and birth weight8 are influenced by hereditary factors, so there may be a familial association between low birth weight and hypertension which does not depend on programming of raised blood pressure. Therefore, assessment of the parental background of people with low birth weight and subsequent hypertension is important. Studies which included information about the participants’ mothers have shown that maternal smoking, socioeconomic group, and anaemia did not explain the observed relations between low birth weight and subsequent high blood pressure.9–11 Maternal blood pressure has been assessed during pregnancy, when higher pressures were associated with lower birth weight12–14 and higher blood pressure in the offspring.13,15–17 Only one study has measured maternal blood pressure outside pregnancy, and this showed that higher blood pressure in 4 year old children was associated with both lower birth weight and higher maternal blood pressure.11 To our knowledge, no study has taken account of any paternal factor other than socioeconomic group. We examined a population of young adults in whom blood pressures have been measured in both parents and sought to establish the contribution of parental blood pressure to the relation between low birth weight and subsequent hypertension.
Subjects and methods
In 1979, as part of the screening programme for the Medical Research Council’s mild hypertension trial, blood pressure was measured in 6088 adults registered at the Ladywell Medical Centre in Edinburgh. In 1986, blood pressure was recorded in 864 young adults registered at the medical centre whose parents had both participated in the earlier screening programme. Some of the 864 offspring were siblings, so the cohort was drawn from 603 families. Details of these offspring and parents have been described elsewhere7 and are shown in table 1. All blood pressures were measured in the same way: at any convenient time of day, after 5 minutes of sitting, and by two trained observers using a Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer. The means of the two readings were used for analysis. Offspring were also weighed and their height was measured, and women were asked if they were using an oral contraceptive. Offspring from this cohort were then selected from groups with maximum contrast in their predisposition to high blood pressure—that is, on the basis of offspring and parental blood pressures being in the upper or lower third of the age adjusted distribution. Subgroups of these offspring participated in a series of further studies, which are reviewed elsewhere.18,19
Table 1.
Offspring
|
Fathers
|
Mothers
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This study (n=452) | Whole study7 (n=864) | This study (n=452) | Whole study7 (n=603) | This study (n=452) | Whole study7 (n=603) | |||
No of men | 231 | 458 | ||||||
No of women taking oestrogens | 104 | 203 | ||||||
Mean age (range) (years) | 21 (16-26) | 21 (16-27) | 45 (35-64) | 46 (35-64) | 43 (34-62) | 43 (34-62) | ||
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 117 (13) | 117 (13) | 127 (17) | 126 (18) | 120 (18) | 120 (18) | ||
Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 66 (11) | 67 (11) | 77 (10) | 77 (10) | 74 (12) | 73 (12) | ||
Body weight (kg) | 65 (10) | 65 (10) | ||||||
Height (m) | 1.70 (0.09) | 1.70 (0.06) | ||||||
Birth weight (g) | 3470 (476) |
Collection of data on birth weight
In 1994 all of the 603 mothers were sent letters asking them to recall the birth weight of their offspring. Replies were received from 398 mothers, providing data for 545 offspring. In addition, the case records at Ladywell Medical Centre were examined to determine the birth weights recorded by midwives. This provided birth weights for 349 offspring, 259 of whom had birth weights recalled by their mother. We validated the maternal recall of birth weights by comparing their values with the birth weights recorded by the midwives. As described in other populations,20,21 maternal recall of birth weight was accurate (95% confidence interval of the mean difference between birth weights recalled by mothers and recorded by midwives was −32 g to 22 g; the 95% confidence interval for an individual measurement, or prediction interval, was −467 g to 462 g).22
In further analyses the available birth weights recorded by midwives were used for 349 offspring and maternal recalled birth weights for the other 286 offspring. This gave birth weight for 635 participants, of whom 352 were siblings and 283 single offspring of their family. To avoid bias due to correlations between siblings, one offspring was selected at random from each family. As a result, analyses were performed on data for 452 offspring. The characteristics of these offspring and their parents for whom birth weights were obtained were not different from those for whom birth weights were not obtained (table 1).
Statistical analysis
Stepwise linear regression analysis was used to identify correlates of birth weight and systolic and diastolic blood pressure in the offspring. All observed relations were stronger for systolic than diastolic blood pressure, so only systolic blood pressures were used in further analyses. Data are shown as means (SD).
Results
The blood pressure of the offspring was higher in men than women and positively correlated with current body weight (table 2). In addition, higher maternal or paternal systolic blood pressure was associated with higher systolic blood pressure in the offspring. Birth weight was lower in the offspring of younger mothers (table 3). In addition, higher maternal, but not paternal, systolic blood pressure was associated with lower birth weight in the offspring.
Table 2.
Variable* | Without parental blood pressures†
|
With parental blood pressures‡
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Slope | r value | P value | Slope | r value | P value | ||
Offspring | |||||||
Body weight | 0.43 mm Hg/kg | 0.33 | <0.0001 | 0.41 mm Hg/kg | 0.31 | <0.0001 | |
Sex§ | −6.34 mm Hg | −0.24 | <0.0001 | −6.64 mm Hg | −0.25 | <0.0001 | |
Birth weight | −2.24 mm Hg/kg | −0.08 | 0.06 | −1.71 mm Hg/kg | −0.06 | 0.15 | |
Parents | |||||||
Systolic blood pressure: | |||||||
Mother | — | — | — | 0.12 mm Hg/mm Hg | 0.16 | <0.0001 | |
Father | — | — | — | 0.11 mm Hg/mm Hg | 0.14 | <0.001 |
Variables that were not significant (P>0.10) in either analysis were offspring’s age, height, and use of contraceptive pill and maternal and paternal age and diastolic blood pressure.
Overall, r=0.48 and F=44.
Overall, r=0.52 and F=35.
Assigned dummy values of 0 for men and 1 for women.
Table 3.
Variable* | Slope | r value† | P value |
---|---|---|---|
Mother’s age at parturition | 12.7 g/year | 0.10 | <0.04 |
Mother’s systolic blood pressure | −3.03 g/mm Hg | −0.12 | <0.01 |
Variables that were not significant were paternal systolic and diastolic blood pressure, maternal diastolic blood pressure, and sex of offspring.
Overall, r=0.14 and F=4.6.
If parental blood pressures were ignored birth weight and subsequent systolic blood pressure were inversely correlated after correction for sex and current body weight (P=0.06), such that a 1 kg decrease in birth weight was associated with a 2.24 mm Hg increase in systolic blood pressure (table 2). However, if parental blood pressures were included in the regression model they had a significant effect, such that the relation between birth weight and blood pressure was weaker (P=0.15), a 1 kg decrease in birth weight being associated with a 1.71 mm Hg increase in systolic blood pressure (table 2).
Discussion
This study confirms a relation between low birth weight and high blood pressure in young adults which is of similar strength to that found in other groups of this age.1 Given the small sample size relative to other studies, this relation was not significant. The study also confirms the well documented influence of parental blood pressure on blood pressure in offspring.7 Our study allows the contribution of parental blood pressure to the relation between low birth weight and high blood pressure in adult offspring to be assessed. It shows that mothers with higher blood pressure measured between 9 and 19 years after their pregnancy had offspring with lower birth weight (P<0.01). These results suggest that low birth weight is, at least in part, a feature of the inherited contribution to hypertension. In this context, the inherited contribution may be mediated by genetic or shared environmental factors, or both. As a result, the correlation between low birth weight and subsequent high blood pressure is confounded by the influence of parental blood pressure.
The size of this confounding effect is difficult to measure because of differences in the precision of the measurements. Both inherited and non-inherited factors are likely to contribute to the relation between birth weight and systolic blood pressure. When we accounted for parental blood pressure, the slope of the relation was reduced from 2.24 mm Hg/kg to 1.71 mm Hg/kg (table 2), suggesting that as much as 24% is accounted for by inherited factors. However, the offspring in this study, born in Edinburgh during 1959-70, lived in a comparatively favourable economic and nutritional environment. The influence of variations in maternal nutrition during pregnancy may be comparatively small in this group, making the inherited influence more apparent. In other populations—for example, those born in India or in wartime Europe,23,24—nutritional factors may be more important. None the less, these observations have important implications for attempts to explain the correlates of low birth weight in humans. In addition to investigation of programmed responses to events in early life, inherited mechanisms should be sought which could explain the association between low birth weight and high blood pressure.
Contrasting influence of mother’s and father’s blood pressure
Birth weight was related to maternal but not paternal blood pressure. This may be because of the influence of maternal size on birth weight8 and the putative imprinting of exclusively maternal genes.25 However, a more likely explanation is that birth weight is dependent on blood pressure during pregnancy. Blood pressure during pregnancy is related to that in later life.26 Mothers with higher blood pressure seemed to deliver smaller babies only if the hypertension was severe and resulted in premature delivery.14,16 Therefore, maternal blood pressure was thought not to contribute to the association between low birth weight and adult hypertension which occurs across the range of birth weight and is independent of gestational age.1,4 We were not able to obtain reliable data for gestational age in our subjects to establish whether, across the range of normal blood pressure, mothers with higher blood pressure delivered earlier. However, recent data using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring has shown that higher maternal blood pressure is associated with lower birth weight independently of gestational age.12 The current observations could be explained if mothers who have higher blood pressure in middle age also had higher blood pressure in pregnancy which was associated with lower birth weight in their offspring.
Conclusion
This study shows a link between two major areas of research in hypertension: the fetal origins and hereditary hypotheses. It will be important to establish whether other correlates of low birth weight—for example, insulin resistance—are subject to the same confounding interactions.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr H V Edwards, Mr C J Foy, Professor S B Harrap, and Dr D W Holton for their help in developing studies in this cohort, and Dr M Upton for helpful discussion.
Footnotes
Funding: Supported by a grant from the Scottish Home and Health Department. BRW is a British Heart Foundation senior research fellow.
Conflict of interest: None.
References
- 1.Law CM, Shiell AW. Is blood pressure inversely related to birth weight? The strength of evidence from a systematic review of the literature. J Hypertens. 1996;14:935–941. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Curhan GC, Chertow GM, Willet WC, Spiegelman D, Colditz GA, Manson JE, et al. Birth weight and adult hypertension and obesity in women. Circulation. 1996;94:1310–1315. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.6.1310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Curhan GC, Willett WC, Rimm EB, Spiegelman D, Ascherio AL, Stampfer MJ. Birth weight and adult hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and obesity in US men. Circulation. 1996;94:3246–3250. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.12.3246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Barker DJP. Fetal origins of coronary heart disease. BMJ. 1995;311:171–174. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6998.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Langley-Evans SC, Welham SJM, Sherman RC, Jackson AA. Weanling rats exposed to maternal low-protein diets during discrete periods of gestation exhibit differing severity of hypertension. Clin Sci. 1996;91:607–615. doi: 10.1042/cs0910607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Benediktsson R, Lindsay RS, Noble J, Seckl JR, Edwards CRW. Glucocorticoid exposure in utero: new model for adult hypertension. Lancet. 1993;341:339–341. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90138-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Watt GCM, Foy CJW, Holton DW, Edwards HE. Prediction of high blood pressure in young people: the limited usefulness of parental blood pressure data. J Hypertens. 1991;9:55–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Morton NE. The inheritance of human birth weight. Am J Hum Genet. 1955;20:125. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1955.tb01362.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Godfrey K, Robinson S, Barker DJP, Osmond C, Cox V. Maternal nutrition in early and late pregnancy in relation to placental and fetal growth. BMJ. 1996;312:410–414. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7028.410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Whincup P, Cook D, Papacosta O, Walker M, Perry I. Maternal factors and development of cardiovascular risk: evidence from a study of blood pressure in children. J Hum Hypertens. 1994;8:337–343. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Law CM, Barker DJP, Bull AR, Osmond C. Maternal and fetal influences on blood pressure. Arch Dis Child. 1991;66:1291–1295. doi: 10.1136/adc.66.11.1291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Churchill D, Perry IJ, Beevers DG. Ambulatory blood pressure in pregnancy and fetal growth. Lancet. 1997;349:7–10. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)06297-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Seidman DS, Laor A, Gale R, Stevenson DK, Mashiach S, Danon YL. Pre-eclampsia and offspring’s blood pressure, cognitive ability and physical development at 17-years-of-age. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;98:1009–1014. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb15339.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.McCowan LME, Buist RG, North RA, Gamble G. Perinatal morbidity in chronic hypertension. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;103:123–129. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09662.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dgani J, Arad I. Measurement of systolic blood pressure in the follow-up of low birth weight infants. J Perinat Med. 1992;20:365–370. doi: 10.1515/jpme.1992.20.5.365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Himmelmann A, Svensson A, Hansson L. Relation of maternal blood pressure during pregnancy to birth weight and blood pressure in children. The hypertension in pregnancy offspring study. J Intern Med. 1994;235:347–352. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1994.tb01085.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Taittonen L, Nuutinen M, Turtinen J, Uhari M. Prenatal and postnatal factors in predicting later blood pressure among children: cardiovascular risk in young Finns. Pediatr Res. 1996;40:627–632. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199610000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Harrap SB, Fraser R, Inglis GC, Lever AF, Beastall GH, Dominiczak MH, et al. Abnormal epinephrine release in young adults with high personal and parental blood pressures. Circulation. 1997;96:556–561. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.2.556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Noon JP, Walker BR, Webb DJ, Shore AC, Holton DW, Edwards HV, et al. Impaired microvascular dilatation and capillary rarefaction in young adults with a predisposition to high blood pressure. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:1873–1879. doi: 10.1172/JCI119354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lumey LH, Stein AD, Ravelli ACJ. Maternal recall of birthweights of adult children: validation by hospital and well baby clinic records. Int J Epidemiol. 1994;23:1006–1012. doi: 10.1093/ije/23.5.1006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Troy LM, Michels KB, Hunter DJ, Spiegelman D, Manson JE, Colditz GA, et al. Self-reported birthweight and history of having been breastfed among younger women: an assessment of validity. Int J Epidemiol. 1996;25:122–127. doi: 10.1093/ije/25.1.122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;i:307–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lumey LH, Stein AD, Ravelli ACJ. Timing of prenatal starvation in women and birth weight in their first and second born offspring: the Dutch famine birth cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1995;61:23–30. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(95)02149-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Stein CE, Fall CHD, Kumaran K, Osmond C, Cox V, Barker DJP. Fetal growth and coronary heart disease in South India. Lancet. 1996;348:1269–1273. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)04547-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lalande M. Parental imprinting and human disease. Annu Rev Genet. 1996;30:173–195. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.30.1.173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chesley LC. The remote prognostic significance of the level of blood pressure in pregnancy. Clin Exp Hypertens (A) 1980;2:777–801. doi: 10.3109/10641968009037142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]