Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Res. 2010 Mar 23;70(7):2962–2972. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4380

The immunosuppressive surface ligand CD200 augments the metastatic capacity of squamous cell carcinoma

Magda Stumpfova 1, Desirée Ratner 2, Edward B Desciak 2, Yehuda D Eliezri 2, David M Owens 1,2,
PMCID: PMC2848906  NIHMSID: NIHMS178667  PMID: 20332223

Abstract

CD200 (OX-2) is a cell surface glycoprotein that imparts immune privilege by suppressing alloimmune and autoimmune responses through its receptor, CD200R, expressed primarily on myeloid cells. The ability of CD200 to suppress myeloid cell activation is critical for maintaining normal tissue homeostasis but may also enhance survival of migratory neoplastic cells. We show that CD200 expression is largely absent in well-differentiated primary squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the skin, but is highly induced in SCC metastases to the lymph node and other solid tissues. CD200 does not influence the proliferative or invasive capacity of SCC cells or their ability to reconstitute primary skin tumors. However, loss of CD200 impairs the ability of SCC cells to metastasize and seed secondary tumors, indicating that the survival of CD200+ SCC cells may depend on their ability to interact with CD200R+ immune cells. The predominant population of CD200R+ stromal cells were CD11b+Gr-1+ myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), which release elevated levels of G-CSF and GM-CSF when in the presence of SCC cells in a CD200-dependent manner. Collectively, our findings implicate CD200 as a hallmark of SCC metastasis and suggest that the ability of CD200+ SCC keratinocytes to directly engage and modulate CD200R+ MDSCs is essential to metastatic survival.

Keywords: skin, carcinogenesis, immune privilege, CD200R1, myeloid-derived suppressor cells

Introduction

Solid tumor metastasis is a complex multistep process, during which neoplastic cells must invade tissue, enter and navigate via the circulatory system, and extravasate to colonize a distant foreign tissue (1, 2), and success of this process is highly dependent on modulating the immune system (3, 4). Some well known examples of tumor-associated immune modulation include loss of tumor-antigens, alterations in HLA class I antigens (5, 6) and pro-inflammatory (Th1) and anti-inflammatory (Th2) T helper cell-derived cytokine production (79), decreased antigen presenting cell activity, secretion of pro-apoptotic factors and recruitment of immunosuppressive cells, all of which may disable anti-tumor effector T cells (10).

CD200 is a widely expressed cell surface glycoprotein that acts as a potent suppressor of CD200R-expressing immune cells (1113). The immunosuppressive capacity of CD200 is crucial for maintaining homeostasis in a number of tissues, including the central and peripheral nervous system (14), vascular endothelia (15), skin (16) and lymphoid cells (12). Mice lacking CD200 are normal in appearance but exhibit elevated numbers of activated CD11b+ macrophages and granulocytes (11). As a result, CD200 null animals display chronic central nervous system inflammation, early onset of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and increased susceptibility to autoimmunity in experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis (EAU) due to a failure to adequately inactivate CD200R1+ macrophages in response to injury (11, 17). Therefore, during homeostasis CD200 maintains an appropriate level of activated macrophages to preserve tissue integrity; whereas during injury-induced heightened inflammatory states CD200 also provides immune privilege to CD200+ tissues to escape macrophage-mediated tissue damage (16, 18). CD200R, a transmembrane glycoprotein, is expressed mostly in myeloid cells (13, 19), and smaller subsets of lymphoid-derived cells (13, 20). There are five described CD200R isoforms, CD200R1-R5, of which CD200R1 is reported to be the major mediator of CD200 immunosuppressive signaling (13, 21).

Several lines of evidence suggest that the immunosuppressive capacity of CD200 may also stimulate cancer development. CD200 is upregulated in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (22), multiple myeloma (23) and acute myeloid leukemia (24). Furthermore, CD200-expressing melanoma (25) and ovarian cancer cells downregulate Th1 cytokine production in co-culture with mixed leukocytes (26), indicating that CD200-mediated immune suppression may also be featured in tumor progression and/or metastasis. This idea is supported in a model of B cell lymphocytic leukemia, where ectopic CD200 expression inhibited the ability of lymphocytes to clear tumor cells, while CD200-negative tumor cells were rejected by CD200R+ peripheral mononuclear blood cells (25). Finally, CD200 expression has also been observed in a tumorigenic keratinocyte line isolated from carcinogen-treated mouse skin (16); however, the significance of CD200 in epithelial tumor metastasis remains to be determined.

We have identified CD200 induction as a hallmark of metastatic SCC. CD200 does not influence primary tumor development but promotes survival of metastatic SCC cells and their ability to seed secondary tumors. Finally, CD200R1+ MDSCs were implicated as the primary myeloid immune cell type potentially responsible for supporting the survival of CD200+ metastatic SCC cells.

Materials and Methods

Antibodies

Antibodies were used against human CD200, mouse CD200, CD3ε, CD86, α6 integrin-FITC (BD Biosciences); NK1.1-488, c-kit, CD123, MHC II, CD11b-FITC, CD11b-PE, Gr-1-FITC, Gr-1-PE, CD11c (BioLegend); Langerin, Foxp3 (eBioscience); Keratin 14 (Covance), CD200R1 (R&D Systems), CD4-APC (Abcam), G-CSF (Santa Cruz), anti-rabbit HRP (Jackson Immunoresearch); species-specific Alexa Fluor-488, -594, -647, and -680 (Invitrogen); and human α6 integrin (kindly provided by Fiona Watt).

Two-stage skin carcinogenesis

Murine skin tumors were induced by a standard two-stage chemical carcinogenesis protocol in FVB mice as previously described (27; see Supplemental Materials and Methods). All mice were housed and sacrificed according to IACUC and NIH guidelines for experimental endpoints including tumor size and morbidity.

Tissue Harvesting

Skin tumors were harvested from DMBA/TPA treated mice upon sacrifice and residual normal skin on the periphery of the tumors was removed using surgical scissors. Mice were also examined internally, and enlarged lymph nodes and lung tumor specimens were extracted with forceps and cleaned from connective tissue. De-identified human cutaneous SCC specimens were obtained from the Dermatology department and human metastatic SCC specimens from the HICCC Tissue Bank at Columbia University under IRB approval. Normal skin and tumor specimens were embedded in O.C.T. and cryopreserved or fixed in 10% NBF and paraffin embedded.

Cell culture

Primary keratinocyte cultures were established from normal skin, benign papillomas, primary cutaneous SCC, or metastatic SCC to the lymph node or lung as previously described (28, 29). All cells were plated on collagen and fibronectin coated dishes in the presence of a mitotically arrested fibroblast feeder layer (28) at 32°C in Williams’ Medium E (Invitrogen) supplemented with 8 µg/mL transferrin (Invitrogen), 409 mg/L glutamine (Invitrogen), 20% FBS (Hyclone), 10 ng/mL EGF (Invitrogen), 5 µg/mL insulin (Sigma), 0.5 µg/mL hydrocortisone (MP Biomedicals), 10−10 M cholera enterotoxin (ICN) and 1× penicillin-streptomycin (Invitrogen). All cell lines are listed in Supplemental Table 1. Cell passages 1–20 were used in experiments.

Generation of stable CD200 knock-down cell lines

To ablate CD200 expression in Lung Met cells, the pSM2c retroviral vector encoding a short hairpin RNA against murine CD200 (pRS-CD200, clone V2MM_8018, Open Biosystems) or control (pRSNS) was transfected into ΦNX-Eco (ecotrophic) packaging cells to produce virus to subsequently transduce AM12 (amphitrophic) producer cells as previously described (27, 30). To transduce Lung Met cells, primary cultures were maintained with mitotically arrested AM12 packaging cells for 48 hours, after which transduced Lung Met cells were selected in 2 µg/mL puromycin (Sigma). CD200 knock-down was visualized by indirect immunofluorescence on glass coverslips and quantified by flow cytometry analysis.

Flow cytometry

All flow cytometry experiments were performed on freshly isolated tumor cell suspensions or pRS-CD200-, pRS-NS-transduced or untransduced Lung Met 1, 2 and 4 cultured keratinocytes (See Supplemental Materials and Methods).

In vitro studies

To measure proliferation, pRS-NS or pRS-CD200 Lung Met 1, 2 or 4 cells were plated into 12-well plates at 50,000 cells/well and cell counts were performed using a hemacytometer in 48-hour increments for a period of up to 2 weeks. Each time point was counted in triplicate for each group and average cell numbers were statistically compared using a student’s t-test (p < 0.05) between pRS-NS and pRS-CD200 groups for each Lung Met cell line.

For invasion assays, pRS-NS or pRS-CD200 Lung Met 1, 2 or 4 cells were plated at 2 × 105 cells per well in matrigel invasion chambers as per the manufacturer’s protocol (BD Biosciences). After 48 hours, membranes were stained with 1% toluidine blue, mounted and microscopically evaluated for the number of invasive cells on 5 randomly chosen fields of view per insert. Normal mouse epidermal keratinocytes (NEK) were analyzed as a control. The average number of cells per membrane was statistically compared using the student’s t-test (p < 0.05) between pRS-NS and pRS-CD200 groups for each Lung Met cell line (n = 3 inserts per group).

In vivo studies

For skin tumor reconstitution, pRS-NS or pRS-CD200 Lung Met 1, 2 and 4 cells were resuspended in HBSS solution and 1.0 × 105 (n = 3 mice per cell group) or 5.0 × 105 (n = 3 mice per cell group) cells were implanted onto the dorsal fascia of recipient mice in silicon grafting chambers as previously described (28) (See Supplemental Materials and Methods). To measure metastasis, pRS-NS or pRS-CD200 Lung Met 1, 2 or 4 cells were resuspended in HBSS and 2 × 105 cells were injected into the tail vein of fully immunocompetent female FVB mice (n = 9 mice per cell group). Lungs were analyzed at 7 or 35 days post injection for the presence of metastatic SCC (n = 3 to 6 mice per time point) (See Supplemental Materials and Methods).

Cytokine Array

8 × 105 pRS-NS or pRS-CD200 Lung Met cells were co-cultured with 1.6 × 105 FACS sorted CD200R1+ immune cells freshly isolated from DMBA/TPA-induced skin tumors. Lung Met/immune cell co-cultures were incubated at 32°C for 24 hours in complete Williams’ Medium E, after which supernatants were collected, filtered and hybridized to the Mouse Inflammation Antibody Array 1 according to the manufacturer’s protocol (RayBiotech). Each experimental group was run in duplicate and controls included supernatants harvested from Lung Met or CD200R1+ immune cells cultured alone. For densitometry analysis, individual cytokine values were corrected by subtraction from the average background reading for each membrane followed by normalization to the average positive control signal (n = 6 positive control readings per membrane). Average corrected cytokine levels (n = 2 cytokine readings per membrane) were statistically compared between all of the following groups: CD200R1+ cells alone, pRS-NS Lung Met cells alone, pRS-CD200 Lung Met cells alone, CD200R1+/pRS-NS Lung Met cultures, and CD200R1+/pRS-CD200 Lung Met cultures (Student’s t-test, p < 0.05).

Results

CD200 is induced in metastatic SCC

To determine a role for CD200 in skin carcinogenesis, we analyzed CD200 expression in primary and metastatic SCC induced by classical two-stage chemical carcinogenesis in FVB mouse skin (27, 31). In response to topical DMBA/TPA treatment, FVB mice develop cutaneous SCC that metastasize to the lymph node and lung (27) (Fig. 1A), a model that is analogous to human SCC pathogenesis (32, 33). CD200 was present in the hair follicle bulge but not in the epidermis of normal murine skin (16) (Fig. 1A) and was also observed in the dermal papilla of telogen and anagen hair follicles (Fig 1A, Supplemental Fig. 1). No CD200 expression was detected in benign papillomas (0/9) or well-differentiated (WD) SCC of the skin (0/24); however, CD200 induction was first observed in the invasive front of poorly-differentiated (PD) SCC (Fig. 1A) and CD200 was highly induced in metastatic SCC in the lymph node (14/14, 100%) and lung (3/3, 100%) (Table 1). Keratin K14 staining distinguished tumor keratinocytes from surrounding stroma (Fig. 1A). These results indicate that induction of CD200 strongly correlates with late stage skin carcinogenesis and raises the possibility that CD200 may play a role in SCC metastasis.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

CD200 is induced in murine cutaneous and metastatic SCC. A, Gross morphology (top row) and hematoxylin & eosin (H&E)-staining (second row), CD200 immunofluorescence (third row) and keratin K14 immunofluorescence (bottom row) of murine normal skin, papilloma, WD SCC, PD SCC, LN Met and Lung Met. Arrowheads point to metastatic SCC nodules in lung (top row). Dashed lines on H&E sections segregate metastatic SCC (kc) from lymph node or lung stroma (st). For immunofluorescence, nuclei were delineated with DAPI (blue), and the basal layer of normal epidermis (IFE) is outlined with a dashed line. White arrowheads point to CD200/K14+ epidermal keratinocytes in normal skin, or CD200+/K14+ metastatic keratinocytes in Lung Met. B, FACS pseudo-color dot plot showing α6 integrin (X-axis) and CD200 (Y-axis) expression or K14 (X-axis) and CD200 (Y-axis) expression (Lung Met only). H&E stained sections correspond to portions of the same tumors analyzed by FACS. Inlay: CD200 immunofluorescence (green) in PD SCC. All scale bars mark 100µm. Abbreviations: dm, dermis; dp, dermal papilla; hf, hair follicle; hg, hair germ; alv, alveolar.

Table 1.

CD200 expression in human and murine SCC

Tumor type Tumor number (n) % CD200+

Human Cutaneous tumors (n = 27)

 Well-differentiated SCC 20 1 (5%)
 Poorly-differentiated SCC 7 2 (29%)

Metastatic SCC (n = 20)

 Lymph node (Head-Neck) 13 11 (85%)
 Other secondary site 7 7 (100%)

Mouse Cutaneous tumors (n = 47)

 Papilloma 9 0
 Well-differentiated SCC 24 0
 Poorly-differentiated SCC 14 14 (100%)

Metastatic SCC (n = 17)

 Lymph node 14 14 (100%)
 Other secondary site 3 3 (100%)

Other secondary sites include liver, brain, bone, abdomen, chest wall, larynx and oral mucosa in human (one specimen per site) and lung in mouse (all three).

Next, we quantified the number of CD200+ cells from freshly isolated primary and metastatic SCC that co-express the keratinocyte surface receptor α6 integrin by flow cytometry analysis. Little to no α6+/CD200+ cells were observed in WD SCC (avg. 3.9%, n = 5) (Fig. 1B); however, a substantial population of α6+/CD200+ cells was detected in PD SCC (avg. 68%, n = 8) (Fig. 1B). Interestingly, expression of CD200 within PD SCC was consistently localized in tumor keratinocytes invading the underlying muscle fascia (Fig. 1B). Importantly, virtually all (LN Met: avg. 88%, n = 7; Lung Met: avg. 93%, n = 3) keratinocytes isolated from metastatic SCC specimens expressed CD200 (Fig. 1B).

A similar expression pattern for CD200 was observed in human cutaneous and metastatic SCC. CD200 expression was rarely observed in human WD SCC (1/20, 5%) but was more frequent in human PD SCC (2/7, 29%) (Fig. 2, Table 1). Notably, 85% (11/13) of human metastatic SCC to the lymph node and 100% (7/7) of metastatic SCC seeding a variety of other secondary organs exhibited CD200 induction (Fig. 2, Table 1). No CD200 expression was detected in normal human epidermis (Fig. 2). These observations confirm that CD200 induction is a hallmark for murine and human metastatic SCC and indicate that the CD200+ pool of SCC keratinocytes rapidly expands during late stage carcinogenesis.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

CD200 is induced in human metastatic SCC. Normal human skin (top row), cutaneous (middle row), and metastatic (bottom row) squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) were H & E counterstained or probed with antibodies against α6 integrin (red) or CD200 (green). DAPI counterstain was conducted to visualize nuclei. Arrowheads delineate the basal layer of the epidermis (epid) (H&E) or point to positive surface detection of α6 integrin and CD200 ligand (LN Met) or the absence of CD200 (Skin, WD SCC). Dashed lines segregate CD200-positive tumor from CD200-negative stroma (LN Met).

CD200 does not influence SCC keratinocyte proliferation or invasion

Established cultures of LN and Lung Met SCC keratinocytes maintained their CD200 expression status, whereas no CD200 expression was observed in K14+ keratinocytes isolated from skin, papilloma or SCC (Fig. 3A, B). The molecular fingerprint of DMBA-induced cutaneous SCC is the transversion mutation in the 61st codon of H-ras (34, 35). We detected the H-ras 61st codon mutation in two of the three (67%) Lung Met specimens (Lung Met 2 and 4), confirming that these tumors were derived from DMBA-induced skin tumors (Supplemental Fig. 2).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

CD200 does not influence SCC keratinocyte proliferation or invasion. A, CD200, DAPI and K14 immunofluorescence in NEK, papilloma (Pap), WD SCC and LN Met cultured keratinocytes. Arrowhead points to positive detection of CD200 (LN Met). All three images for each column represent the same field of view. B, Top: CD200 and K14 immunofluorescence in untransduced and pRS-CD200-transduced LN Met cells. Arrows point to the presence (untransduced) or loss (pRS-CD200) of CD200 expression. Dotted line delineates the boundary of a pRS-CD200 keratinocyte colony. Both images for untransduced and pRS-CD200 cells represent the same field of view. FACS histograms showing CD200 surface levels in Lung Met 1, 2 and 4 keratinocytes (red line), IgG control for each plot is outlined in blue, or Lung Met 4 cells transduced with pRS-NS and pRS-CD200 shRNA. Scale bars designate gate set for FACS-sorting into α6+/CD200+ (pRS-NS) and α6+/CD200 (pRS-CD200) cell populations. C, Average counts of Lung Met 4 cells transduced with pRS-NS (●) or pRS-CD200 (△) in 48-hour increments (n = 3 per time point). Log phase of the growth (days 6 – 10) was used to determine the slope of each growth curve. D, Bar graph showing the average number of cells per insert as a measure of the invasive capacity of Lung Met 4 cells transduced with pRS-NS or pRS-CD200 (n = 3 inserts per group).

To measure the effects of CD200 on proliferation, short hairpin RNA-transduced (pRS-NS or pRS-CD200) Lung Met 4 cells (Fig. 3B) were plated at equal densities and counted every 48 hours for a period of two weeks, by which time all cells had reached confluency. No significant difference in log phase growth was observed between pRS-NS (doubling rate = 1.6 × 105) and pRS-CD200 (doubling rate = 1.6 × 105) Lung Met 4 cells (Fig. 3C). Similar results were obtained for Lung Met 1 and 2 cultures (data not shown). pRS-NS and pRS-CD200 Lung Met 4 cells were also evaluated for their capacity to invade through matrigel. While Lung Met cells were 6–7 fold more invasive than NEK (data not shown), there was no significant difference in the invasive capacity between pRS-NS and pRS-CD200 Lung Met 4 cells (Fig. 3D). Similar results were obtained for Lung Met 1 and 2 cultures (data not shown). Collectively, these results indicate that CD200 does not influence the proliferation or invasion of metastatic SCC cells.

CD200 does not influence primary cutaneous SCC formation

To assess the role of CD200 in primary cutaneous SCC formation, pRS-NS or pRS-CD200 Lung Met 4 cells were surgically implanted onto the dorsal fascia of fully immunocompetent FVB mice and evaluated for their ability to reconstitute cutaneous SCC (Fig. 4A). FVB mice are an inbred strain and highly syngeneic thereby circumventing problems related to hostgraft compatibility. Within 5–7 weeks post grafting, both pRS-NS and pRS-CD200 Lung Met 4 cells (1×105 or 5 × 105 cells/graft) were capable of regenerating cutaneous SCC (Fig. 4A, B). There was no difference in SCC size as determined by tumor diameter (data not shown) or weight between pRS-NS and pRS-CD200 Lung Met 4 grafts (Fig. 4B). Similar results were obtained in SCC grafts obtained from Lung Met 1 and 2 cells (data not shown). These data indicate that CD200 may not play a role in primary SCC formation, an idea consistent with the onset of CD200 induction in late stage PD SCC.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Loss of CD200 impairs SCC metastatic potential. A, Gross images of reconstituted SCC grafts from pRS-NS or pRS-CD200 Lung Met 4 cells. Lower panels show H&E or keratin K14 (red) staining in graft sections. Scale bar represents 100µm. B, Bar graph illustrating similar average weights of SCC grafts reconstituted with 1 × 105 pRS-NS (n = 2), 1 × 105 pRS-CD200 (n = 3), 5 × 105 pRS-NS (n = 3) or 5 × 105 pRS-CD200 (n = 2) Lung Met 4 cells. C, Bar graph showing the percentage of K14+ metastatic keratinocytes present in the lung at 7 days or 35 days following tail vein injection. Vehicle control- HBSS injected mice. *- statistically significant difference (p = 0.0001); **- statistically significant difference (p = 0.0001). D, H&E and keratin K14 immunofluorescence (red) in lung sections confirm the presence of metastatic SCC in pRS-NS Lung Met 4 injected mice but not in HBSS control mice.

Loss of CD200 diminishes SCC metastatic potential

To determine whether CD200 may be essential for SCC metastasis, pRS-NS or pRS-CD200 Lung Met 4 keratinocytes were assessed for their ability to seed secondary tumors in the lung following tail vein injections in FVB mice. The tail vein assay is a well-established model of experimental metastasis that tests the ability of tumor cells to cross the alveolar-capillary barrier and form tumors in the lung. Under these conditions, a five week incubation was the latest allowable time point for harvesting tissues as the morbidity related to lung metastasis was typically too severe by 6 weeks post injection (data not shown). Upon sacrifice, animals were subjected to gross inspection to detect the presence of secondary tumors in internal organs; however, SCC were only observed in the lung. Harvested lung tissues were analyzed by FACS analysis for CD200 and K14 (K14 is not normally expressed in lung tissue) expressing metastatic SCC keratinocytes. At 7 days post injection, low levels of both pRS-NS (avg. = 0.76%) and pRS-CD200 (avg. = 0.48%) Lung Met cells were detected in total lung cell suspensions but these levels were not statistically different (p = 0.11) (n = 3 mice per group) (Fig. 4C). However, the percentage of K14+ Lung Met cells increased 4-fold in pRS-NS injected mice (n = 3 mice), whereas the percentage of K14+ cells actually decreased approximately 2-fold in pRS-CD200 injected mice (p = 0.0001) (n = 6 mice) by 35 days (Fig. 4C). Consequently, the metastatic capacity of pRS-NS Lung Met cells was 8 to 9-fold higher compared to pRS-CD200 Lung Met cells (p = 0.0001) (Fig. 4C). Similar results were obtained for all three Lung Met cell lines (data not shown). These data indicate that CD200 promotes SCC metastasis by supporting the survival of metastatic cells seeded in secondary tissues.

CD200R-expressing immune cells are present in cutaneous and metastatic SCC

To determine whether CD200+ SCC cells may interact with CD200R+ immune cells during skin carcinogenesis, DMBA-induced skin and metastatic tumors were analyzed for the presence of CD200R1-expressing cells. CD200R1+ cells were present in the stroma of benign papillomas (data not shown), WD SCC, LN Met and Lung Met (Fig. 5A and Supplementary Fig. 3A) and were tightly associated with SCC keratinocytes suggestive of direct cell-cell contact (Fig. 5A). Little to no CD200R1+ cells were found to co-express NK1.1, CD3 or c-kit, thereby excluding a natural killer cell, lymphoid or mast cell phenotype (Supplemental Fig. 3C). In addition, no significant labeling for CD123, Langerin, CD86 or CD11c was observed in the CD200R1+ population by FACS analysis (data not shown). However, a predominant population of CD200R1+ cells was found to co-express the myeloid lineage marker CD11b (avg. = 87.9% of CD200R1+ cells coexpress CD11b; n = 5) (Fig. 5B). Furthermore, most of the CD200R1+/CD11b+ cell population also expressed Gr-1 (avg. = 74.5% of CD200R1+/CD11b+ cells co-express Gr-1) (Fig. 5B). Finally, the remaining population of CD200R1+ cells co-expressed the MHC class II surface molecule (avg. = 8.4% of CD200R1+ cells co-express MHC class II) (Fig. 5B), potentially marking a population of Langerhans cells (36). The co-expression of CD200R1 and CD11b in stromal SCC cells identified by FACS analysis was confirmed by immunofluorescence labeling in tissue sections of WD SCC (Fig. 5B and Supplemental Fig. 3B) and LN Met (Supplemental Fig. 3B).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

CD200R1+ stromal cells are CD11b+/Gr-1+ MDSCs. A, CD200R1 immunofluorescence in WD SCC, LN Met and Lung Met (white arrows). DAPI counterstain was conducted to visualize nuclei. Dashed line demarcates SCC keratinocytes in LN Met. B, For CD200R1 FACS analysis of CD200R1, CD11b, and Gr-1 or MHC II expression. The total population of CD200R1+ cells were gated and subsequently analyzed for expression of CD11b and Gr-1 or MHC class II. The percentage of the total CD200R1 pool for a single experiment is shown. Far right panel: murine SCC were stained with antibodies against CD200R1 (red) and CD11b (green) and counterstained with DAPI (blue). Arrows point to CD200R1+/CD11b+ (yellow) stromal MDSCs. C, Left: Bar graph showing the densitometric units representing GM-CSF and G-CSF levels in pRS-NS Lung Met/CD200R1+ co-cultures versus pRS-CD200 Lung Met/CD200R1+ co-cultures. *- statistically significant difference (GM-CSF, p = 0.049; G-CSF, p = 0.002). Right: H&E staining (top left) and G-CSF (red) and CD200 (green) immunofluorescence in murine PD SCC. Nuclei were delineated with DAPI (blue). Scale bars mark 50µm.

Immunosuppressive regulatory T cells (Treg) are also implicated in cutaneous SCC progression (37); however, we could not correlate any distribution of Foxp3+ cells with the presence or absence of CD200 (Supplemental Fig. 4A). The identification of Foxp3+ Treg was confirmed by CD4 co-labeling (data not shown). Collectively, these studies identify the major CD200R1+ stromal cell present in primary skin SCC as CD11b+/Gr-1+ MDSCs.

Metastatic SCC cells modulate MDSC activity via CD200-CD200R interaction

To gain insight into a potential mechanistic link between the CD200-CD200R interaction and SCC metastasis, pRS-NS or pRS-CD200 Lung Met keratinocytes were co-cultured with equal amounts of CD200R1+ MDSCs extracted from DMBA-induced skin tumors, after which the levels of 40 secreted pro-inflammatory cytokines were analyzed on Inflammation Antibody Arrays. We observed a substantial increase in the release of 2 out of 40 cytokines, GM-CSF and G-CSF, in co-cultures consisting of pRS-NS Lung Met (CD200+) cells and CD200R1+ MDSCs but not in co-cultures of pRS-CD200 Lung Met (CD200 knock-down) cells and CD200R1+ MDSCs or any of the single Lung Met or MDSC cultures (Supplemental Fig. 4B). In addition, the net production values of GMCSF and G-CSF in pRS-NS Lung Met/CD200R1+ MDSC co-cultures compared to pRSCD200 Lung Met/CD200R1+ MDSC co-cultures were 4-fold (p = 0.049) and 20-fold (p = 0.002) higher, respectively (Fig. 5C). These results demonstrate a functional role for the interaction between CD200 ligand in metastatic SCC cells and CD200R1 in MDSCs. Finally, immunofluorescence staining confirmed the presence of G-CSF-expressing cells in the stroma of CD200+ cutaneous murine PD SCC (Fig. 5D) in the same area where MDSCs are localized (Fig. 5A). G-CSF-positive infiltrative cells were detected in 67% (8/12) SCC analyzed (Fig. 5D); however, the presence of G-CSF was not exclusive to PD SCC.

Discussion

Our study links CD200 induction to the invasive and metastatic capacity of both human and murine SCC and establishes CD200 as a potential criterion in the diagnosis of metastatic cutaneous SCC. Interestingly, CD200 does not directly alter the phenotype of metastatic SCC cells but depends on interaction with CD200R1+ immune cells to promote metastasis. A similar model has been reported in leukemia cells that exhibit increased surface levels of CD47, an immunoglobulin-like ligand that binds its receptor, SIRPα, expressed on macrophages. The CD47-SIRPα interaction blocks macrophage phagocytosis of leukemia cells thereby stimulating metastasis (38).

CD200 has recently been established as a marker of a stem cell population residing in the bulge region of the hair follicle (39) and is thought to be one of a number of immunosuppressive molecules expressed by hair follicle stem cells that protect against immune destruction thereby preserving the regenerative capacity of hair appendages (40). Interestingly, the hair follicle bulge has recently been shown to be a site of origin for cutaneous SCC stem cells (41) and some normal phenotypic markers of bulge keratinocyte stem cells, such as CD34 expression, are preserved in cutaneous SCC (41). Along these lines, it is feasible that CD200 expression in SCC cells may mark a population of cancer stem cells. However, we were unable to detect CD200+ keratinocytes in papillomas, the benign precursor to SCC. While we did detect a small population of CD200+ keratinocytes in WD SCC by FACS analysis, we cannot rule out the possibility of contaminating normal cells contributing to this population. The results of our tumor reconstitution studies would suggest that, if CD200 does label SCC stem cells, it is not required for their development in the skin. Moreover, the uniform expression of CD200 in metastatic SCC is not entirely consistent with the notion that cancer stem cells are rare cells that maintain differentiated and phenotypically-distinct progeny in tumors.

Using a mouse multistage model of SCC metastasis, we identified the predominant CD200R1+ immune cell species infiltrating the stroma of cutaneous and metastatic SCC as CD11b+/Gr-1+ MDSCs. In the mouse, MDSCs have been well described as highly immunosuppressive CD11b+/Gr-1+ cells that commonly infiltrate solid tumors or other sites of inflammation (42, 43). To our knowledge this is the first report of CD200R expression in MDSCs infiltrating any tumor type, and, therefore, provides a new dynamic to the behavior of tumor promoting MDSCs. In a normal tissue microenvironment, ligation to CD200 would suppress the activity of CD200R+ mature myeloid cells. However, in a tumor microenvironment, activation of CD200R in MDSCs may stimulate the ability of these cells to promote tumorigenesis by immune suppression or other means. This concept is supported in part by our in vitro data demonstrating that the general effects of CD200+ tumor cells engaging CD200R1+ MDSCs are stimulatory rather than suppressive. Interestingly, MDSCs are present in the stroma of benign papillomas and WD SCC well before the onset of CD200 induction. This would also suggest multiple roles for MDSCs in carcinogenesis in that the previously reported immunosuppressive mechanisms of MDSCs (42,43), and perhaps CD200R-independent, may support the early development and malignant conversion of neoplastic cells in the primary tumor site. Whereas in later stages of carcinogenesis, CD200+ SCC cells use MDSCs in a CD200R-dependent manner to gain immune privilege and seed secondary tumors.

We observed that MDSCs are stimulated to release elevated levels of G-CSF and GM-CSF upon interaction with metastatic SCC cells in a CD200-dependent manner. A number of studies have reported that G-CSF administration can enhance tumor angiogenesis, growth and malignant progression in vivo (44), while GM-CSF has been shown primarily to stimulate anti-tumor immune function in mice and humans (45). While it is conceivable that the modulation of MDSC behavior via the CD200-CD200R interaction may establish a highly immunosuppressive, pro-metastatic milieu through GCSF and GM-CSF production, the mechanistic significance of these pro-inflammatory cytokines remains to be determined. Along these lines, a more comprehensive delineation of MDSC behavior resulting from CD200R activation will be the focus of future studies.

The pattern of CD200 induction was preferentially localized to the invading front of tumor cells in PD SCC, indicating that CD200 may play roles in local tumor invasion as well as metastasis and that the proximity of neoplastic cells to tumor stromal-derived factors may be a key factor to CD200 induction. In fact, both IFNγ and TNFα can induce CD200 expression (46). Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that CD200 may be predominantly important for primary and metastatic tumor cells as they invade certain microenvironments and, in as much, may not be fundamental for the metastatic process. However, we found CD200 expression present in human metastatic SCC specimens isolated from at least 8 different body sites, suggesting that CD200 is not selectively regulated by certain tumor microenvironments but may be a general feature of the metastatic SCC cell. Moreover, we did not observe CD200 in human or murine WD SCC, although these are highly invasive lesions, and CD200 levels were maintained in metastatic SCC cells in culture, suggesting that the regulation of CD200 is a permanent fixture of the late-invasive/metastatic cell. Finally, the observation of enhanced early survival of CD200+ cells following tail vein injection, but preceding tumor implantation, compared to CD200 cells strongly favors a key role for CD200 in metastasis. In conclusion, the onset of CD200 expression in PD SCC indicates roles for CD200 in tumor invasion and metastasis, while the mechanisms that underlie the induction of CD200, whether they involve a combination of tumor stromal-derived factors and genetic/epigenetic changes within invading SCC cells, remain to be determined.

Supplementary Material

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by NIH R01CA114014 and R21CA131897 grants. We are grateful to Fiona Watt for providing the human α6 antibody and we especially thank Kristie Gordon for her assistance with flow cytometry.

References

  • 1.Coussens LM, Werb Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature. 2002;420:860–867. doi: 10.1038/nature01322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chambers AF, Groom AC, MacDonald IC. Dissemination and growth of cancer cells in metastatic sites. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:563–572. doi: 10.1038/nrc865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.de Visser KE, Eichten A LM. Paradoxical roles of the immune system during cancer development. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:24–37. doi: 10.1038/nrc1782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zou W. Immunosuppressive networks in the tumour environment and their therapeutic relevance. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5:263–274. doi: 10.1038/nrc1586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.French LE, Tschopp J. Defective death receptor signaling as a cause of tumor immune escape. Semin Cancer Biol. 2002;12:51–55. doi: 10.1006/scbi.2001.0405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Algarra I, Garcia-Lora A, Cabrera T, Ruiz-Cabello F, Garrido F. The selection of tumor variants with altered expression of classical and nonclassical MHC class I molecules: implications for tumor immune escape. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2004;53:904–910. doi: 10.1007/s00262-004-0517-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Toutirais O, Chartier P, Dubois D, et al. Constitutive expression of TGF-β1, interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 by tumor cells as a major component of immune escape in human ovarian carcinoma. Eur Cytokine Netw. 2003;14:246–255. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Somasundaram R, Jacob L, Swoboda R, et al. Inhibition of cytolytic T lymphocyte proliferation by autologous CD4+/CD25+ regulatory T cells in a colorectal carcinoma patient is mediated by transforming growth factor-b. Cancer Res. 2002;62:5267–5272. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shurin MR, Lu L, Kalinski P, Stewart-Akers AM, Lotze MT. Th1/Th2 balance in cancer, transplantation and pregnancy. Springer Semin Immunopathol. 1999;21:339–359. doi: 10.1007/BF00812261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rabinovich GA, Gabrilovich D, Sotomayor EM. Immunosuppressive strategies that are mediated by tumor cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007;25:267–296. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hoek RM, Ruuls SR, Murphy CA, et al. Down-regulation of the macrophage lineage through interaction with OX2 (CD200) Science. 2000;290:1768–1771. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5497.1768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wright GJ, Puklavec MJ, Willis AC, et al. Lymphoid/neuronal cell surface OX2 glycoprotein recognizes a novel receptor on macrophages implicated in the control of their function. Immunity. 2000;13:233–242. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)00023-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gorczynski R, Chen Z, Kai Y, Lee L, Wong S, Marsden PA. CD200 is a ligand for all members of the CD200R family of immunoregulatory molecules. J Immunol. 2004;172:7744–7749. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.12.7744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Meuth SG, Simon OJ, Grimm A, et al. CNS inflammation and neuronal degeneration is aggravated by impaired CD200-CD200R-mediated macrophage silencing. J Neuroimmunol. 2008;194:62–69. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2007.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ko YC, Chien HF, Jiang-Shieh YF, et al. Endothelial CD200 is heterogeneously distributed, regulated and involved in immune cell-endothelium interactions. J Anat. 2009;214:183–195. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00986.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rosenblum MD, Olasz EB, Yancey KB, et al. Expression of CD200 on epithelial cells of the murine hair follicle: a role in tissue-specific immune tolerance? J Invest Dermatol. 2004;123:880–887. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.23461.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Copland DA, Calder CJ, Raveney BJ, et al. Monoclonal antibody-mediated CD200 receptor signaling suppresses macrophage activation and tissue damage in experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis. Am J Pathol. 2007;171:580–588. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.070272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Broderick C, Hoek RM, Forrester JV, Liversidge J, Sedgwick JD, Dick AD. Constitutive retinal CD200 expression regulates resident microglia and activation state of inflammatory cells during experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis. Am J Pathol. 2002;161:1669–1677. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64444-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wright GJ, Cherwinski H, Foster-Cuevas M, et al. Characterization of the CD200 receptor family in mice and humans and their interactions with CD200. J Immunol. 2003;171:3034–3046. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.6.3034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fallarino F, Asselin-Paturel C, Vacca C, et al. Murine plasmacytoid dendritic cells initiate the immunosuppressive pathway of tryptophan catabolism in response to CD200 receptor engagement. J Immunol. 2004;173:3748–3754. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.6.3748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Boudakov I, Liu J, Fan N, Gulay P, Wong K, Gorczynski RM. Mice lacking CD200R1 show absence of suppression of lipopolysaccharide-induced tumor necrosis factor-alpha and mixed leukocyte culture responses by CD200. Transplantation. 2007;84:251–257. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000269795.04592.cc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kretz-Rommel A, Qin F, Dakappagari N, et al. CD200 expression on tumor cells suppresses antitumor immunity: new approaches to cancer immunotherapy. J Immunol. 2007;178:5595–5605. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.9.5595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Moreaux J, Hose D, Reme T, et al. CD200 is a new prognostic factor in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2006;108:4194–4197. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-06-029355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tonks A, Hills R, White P, et al. CD200 as a prognostic factor in acute myeloid leukaemia. Leukemia. 2007;21:566–568. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Petermann KB, Rozenberg GI, Zedek D, et al. CD200 is induced by ERK and is a potential therapeutic target in melanoma. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:3922–3929. doi: 10.1172/JCI32163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Siva A, Xin H, Qin F, Oltean D, Bowdish KS, Kretz-Rommel A. Immune modulation by melanoma and ovarian tumor cells through expression of the immunosuppressive molecule CD200. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2008;57:987–996. doi: 10.1007/s00262-007-0429-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Owens DM, Romero RM, Gardner C, Watt FM. Suprabasal α6β4 integrin expression in epidermis results in enhanced tumorigenesis and disruption of TGFβ signaling. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:3783–3791. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jensen UB, Yan X, Triel C, Woo SH, Christensen R, Owens DM. A distinct population of clonogenic and multipotent murine follicular keratinocytes residing in the upper isthmus. J Cell Sci. 2008;121:609–617. doi: 10.1242/jcs.025502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wu WY, Morris RJ. Method for the harvest and assay of in vitro clonogenic keratinocytes stem cells from mice. Methods Mol Biol. 2005;289:79–86. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-830-7:079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Levy L, Broad S, Zhu AJ, et al. Optimized retroviral infection of human epidermal keratinocytes: long-term expression of transduced integrin gene following grafting on to SCID mice. Gene Ther. 1998;5:913–922. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3300689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Owens DM, Wei SJ, Smart RC. A multihit, multistage model of chemical carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis. 1999;20:1837–1844. doi: 10.1093/carcin/20.9.1837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Quon H, Liu FF, Cummings BJ. Potential molecular prognostic markers in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Head Neck. 2001;23:147–159. doi: 10.1002/1097-0347(200102)23:2<147::aid-hed1010>3.0.co;2-#. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Green CL, Khavari PA. Targets for molecular therapy of skin cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 2004;14:63–69. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2003.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Quintanilla M, Brown K, Ramsden M, Balmain A. Carcinogen-specific mutation and amplification of Ha-ras during mouse skin carcinogenesis. Nature. 1986;322:78–80. doi: 10.1038/322078a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bizub D, Wood AW, Skalka AM. Mutagenesis of the Ha-ras oncogene in mouse skin tumors induced by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986;83:6048–6052. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.16.6048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rosenblum MD, Woodliff JE, Madsen NA, McOlash LJ, Keller MR, Truitt RL. Characterization of CD200-receptor expression in the murine epidermis. J Invest Dermatol. 2005;125:1130–1138. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-202X.2005.23948.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Clark RA, Huang SJ, Murphy GF, et al. Human squamous cell carcinomas evade the immune response by down-regulation of vascular E-selectin and recruitment of regulatory T cells. J Exp Med. 2008;205:2221–2234. doi: 10.1084/jem.20071190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jaiswal S, Jamieson CH, Pang WW, et al. CD47 is upregulated on circulating hematopoietic stem cells and leukemia cells to avoid phagocytosis. Cell. 2009;138:271–285. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ohyama M, Terunuma A, Tock CL, et al. Characterization and isolation of stem cell-enriched human hair follicle bulge cells. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:249–260. doi: 10.1172/JCI26043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cotsarelis G. Epithelial stem cells: a folliculocentric view. J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126:1459–1468. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Malanchi I, Peinado H, Kassen D, et al. Cutaneous cancer stem cell maintenance is dependent on beta-catenin signalling. Nature. 2008;452:650–653. doi: 10.1038/nature06835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gabrilovich DI, Nagaraj S. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as regulators of the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9:162–174. doi: 10.1038/nri2506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Murdoch C, Muthana M, Coffelt SB, Lewis CE. The role of myeloid cells in the promotion of tumour angiogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:618–631. doi: 10.1038/nrc2444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Okazaki T, Ebihara S, Asada M, Kanda A, Sasaki H, Yamaya M. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor promotes tumor angiogenesis via increasing circulating endothelial progenitor cells and Gr1+CD11b+ cells in cancer animal models. Int Immunol. 2006;18:1–9. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxh334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Eubank TD, Roberts RD, Khan M, et al. Granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor inhibits breast cancer growth and metastasis by invoking an anti-angiogenic program in tumor-educated macrophages. Cancer Res. 2009;69:2133–2140. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Chen Z, Marsden PA, Gorczynski RM. Role of a distal enhancer in the transcriptional responsiveness of the human CD200 gene to interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Mol Immunol. 2009;46:1951–1963. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2009.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

RESOURCES