Abstract
The GroEL/GroES protein folding chamber is formed and dissociated by ATP binding and hydrolysis. ATP hydrolysis in the GroES-bound (cis) ring gates entry of ATP into the opposite unoccupied trans ring, which allosterically ejects cis ligands. While earlier studies suggested that hydrolysis of cis ATP is the rate limiting step of the cycle (t½ ~10s), a recent study suggested that ADP release from the cis ring may be rate-limiting (t½ ~15–20 sec). Here we have measured ADP release using a coupled enzyme assay and observed a t½ for release of ≤4–5 seconds, indicating that this is not the rate-limiting step of the reaction cycle.
Keywords: GroEL, GroES, ATP, ADP, Nucleotide cycle, Coupled enzyme assay
1. Introduction
During GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding, the two GroEL rings alternate as GroES-bound folding chambers, directed by a cycle of ATP binding and hydrolysis [1,2]. In particular, the rings are strongly anti-cooperative for ATP binding, such that only one ring at a time becomes cooperatively filled with ATP in its seven equatorial sites [3]. ATP binding to a ring rapidly frees its apical domains from each other, producing small apical domain elevation and twisting movements [4], enabling efficient polypeptide binding [5], as well as subsequent recruitment of GroES [6,7; see also 8]. Association of GroES in turn triggers large apical domain elevation and clockwise twisting movements that are associated with ejection of polypeptide into what becomes, over ~1 sec, a GroES-domed hydrophilic chamber where polypeptide commences to fold in isolation [9–14]. After ~10 sec, this ring hydrolyzes ATP, gating entry of ATP into the opposite ring, which triggers rapid allosteric release of both GroES and polypeptide ligands from the folding-active ring [1,15]. Such ATP binding to the trans ring also initiates production of a folding-active state of what had been the unoccupied ring [2].
While rapid release of GroES, polypeptide, and the cis-formed γ-phosphate by trans ATP binding have been experimentally demonstrated (t½< 1 sec)[2,10,16], the rate of cis ADP release had not been measured until recently, but had been assumed to be similar. Thus, from measurements taken to date, it has appeared that the longest step of the reaction cycle is the folding-active, ATP/GroES-bound state of a ring [e.g. 2], but this has recently been challenged by an experiment that reported relatively slow release of hydrolyzed ADP from the folding-active ring, measured by a gel filtration assay [17], with a half-time of release of ADP of 15–20 seconds. Prolonged retention of ADP would sterically prevent ATP from rebinding to the original cis ring when the machine returns from a subsequent cycle on the opposite ring. Even more immediately, ADP might allosterically inhibit the step of ATP turnover in the next cycle occurring in the opposite ring [e.g. 18]. Given this measured dwell time of ADP, its release was proposed to be the rate-limiting step of the reaction cycle [17]. Yet a rate-limiting step with a t½ of 15–20 seconds seems inconsistent with previously measured rates of steady-state ATP hydrolysis of actively cycling GroEL-GroES reactions, which correspond, as mentioned, to a t½ of ~10 sec [e.g. 2,19]. Because of concerns about the reported measurement, we have measured this step by a different method, employing a coupled enzyme assay that provides a fluorescent readout of the rate of ADP departure following ATP binding to the trans ring of an asymmetric GroEL/GroES/ADP7 complex. We report that, by such measurement, ADP release is complete within 10 seconds. Thus ADP release does not appear to be rate-limiting and rather, it would appear, as in earlier observations, that it is cis ATP hydrolysis that is the rate limiting step of the reaction cycle.
2. Materials and methods
2.1 Proteins
GroEL D398A was expressed in E. coli and purified as previously described [2]. Asymmetric GroEL D398A/GroES/ADP7 complexes were generated by mixing 10 µM GroEL D398A with 12 µM GroES and 70 µM ATP in 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 5 mM KOAc, 10 mM Mg(OAc)2, 1 mM DTT, and incubating for 2 hr at 25°C. Efficiency of formation of these complexes and stability during incubation was assessed by gel filtration studies using a fluorescent-labeled GroES (see Supplemental Figure).
2.2 ADP release assay
ADP release from chaperonin complexes was measured by coupling with pyruvate kinase and lactate dehydrogenase, following the decrease in NADH fluorescence [20]. In all experiments, NADH was excited at 340 nm, and emission was measured using a color separation filter (370–525 nm). In a typical ADP release experiment, equal volumes of 10 µM D398A/GroES/ADP7 complex and assay buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 5 mM KOAc, 10 mM Mg(OAc)2, 1 mM DTT, 0.5 mM PEP, 0.150 mM NADH, 120 µg/ml PK, 80 µg/ml LDH) containing 0.3 mM ATP were mixed in a stopped-flow device and fluorescence recorded. The data from at least 10 individual mixes were summed for each kinetic trace.
3. Results and discussion
To measure the rate of ADP release from an asymmetric GroEL/GroES/ADP7 complex, a mutant version of GroEL, D398A, was employed [1]. The substitution in this mutant, located in the intermediate domain, alters the residue that serves as a base to activate water for ATP hydrolysis. The mutant hydrolyzes ATP at a rate ~2% that of wild-type GroEL, and thus effectively allows study of a single turnover of the reaction. Accordingly, D398A was incubated with GroES and a concentration of ATP sufficient to fill one ring, allowing formation of an asymmetric GroEL398A/GroES/ATP7 complex (Fig. 1). This complex was incubated for 2 hr at 25°C to allow ATP in the cis ring to hydrolyze, producing an ADP-containing asymmetric complex whose ADP release could now be studied by stopped-flow mixing with ATP, which would bind to the open trans ring, discharging the cis ligands [1]. The rate of departure of ADP from the cis ring was monitored here by a coupled enzyme assay using pyruvate kinase and lactate dehydrogenase (Fig. 1). The pyruvate kinase step transfers a phosphate from PEP to the released ADP to form pyruvate and ATP, and the LDH step reduces the pyruvate to lactate via the oxidation of NADH, whose loss of fluorescence could be directly monitored.
Fig. 1.
Scheme for monitoring ADP release from asymmetric GroEL/GroES/ADP7 complex. D398A ATP hydrolysis-defective GroEL (10 µM) was employed to confine the reaction to a single turnover. An asymmetric complex with GroES (10 µM) was formed (top row) by adding 70 µM ATP amounting to 1 ring-full, producing an asymmetric D398A/GroES/ATP7 complex. This was allowed to undergo ATP hydrolysis during a 2 hour incubation to produce a D398A/GroES/ADP7 complex. The asymmetric ADP complex was then incubated with ATP (150 µM final concentration) in a coupled enzyme assay mixture by stopped-flow mixing (second row). Binding of ATP in the trans ring leads to ejection of the ligands from the cis ring (second row right panel). Released ADP was detected by the coupled enzyme mixture (third and fourth rows), with loss of NADH fluorescence monitored over time. Blue dots signify D398A substitution in intermediate domain of the GroEL subunits; T, ATP; D, ADP; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase.
In a control test, when ATP was added to GroEL D398A alone (Fig. 2), we observed no change in the NADH fluorescence over 40 sec, consistent with very slow turnover of ATP by the D398A mutant complex and reflecting the ability of the assay to distinguish ADP from ATP. In a second set of control tests, varying known concentrations of ADP similar to those expected to be produced were directly added to the assay mixture in the absence of chaperonin by stopped-flow mixing (Fig. 3). This produced in each case a decline of NADH fluorescence after a very brief lag, to an extent proportional to the concentration of ADP (Fig. 3). In this range of concentrations, the rates of NADH oxidation could be fit to single exponential equations (disregarding the initial lag) with similar apparent rate constants of about 0.30 sec−1. These data indicate that any observed rates of ADP release slower than 0.30 sec−1 would represent actual rates of release (rather than rates of the coupling reactions). Next, 300 µM ATP was added to 10 µM GroEL398A/GroES/ADP7 complex by 1:1 stopped flow mixing (Fig. 1). This produced a drop of NADH fluorescence (after a slight lag) with an apparent rate constant of 0.15 sec−1 (Fig. 2). Because this rate is slower than the rate of the coupling reaction, it provides at least a minimum estimate of the rate of ADP release in an ongoing cycling reaction. The amplitude of the change in Fig. 2 corresponds to ~32 µM ADP (cf. Fig. 3 inset), close to the amount expected for turnover of a single ring (35 µM). Thus the present measurements support a half-time of ADP release of less than 4–5 sec, indicating, e.g. in comparison to the ~10 second half-time for ATP hydrolysis, that this is not the rate-limiting step of the reaction cycle.
Fig. 2.
ADP release from GroEL D398A alone (black trace) and from a D398A/GroES/ADP7 complex formed as in Fig. 1 (red trace) monitored by loss of NADH fluorescence. The respective chaperonins, 10 µM, were mixed 1:1 in the stopped flow device with the coupled assay mixture containing 300 µM ATP, and fluorescence of NADH was directly monitored.
Fig. 3.
Measurement of rate and extent of NADH consumption upon stopped flow mixing of various concentrations of ADP with the coupled assay mixture. For all concentrations used, there is a drop in fluorescence beyond a slight lag that could be fit with a single exponential, with a rate constant of ~0.30 sec−1. The extent of consumption increases linearly with the concentration of ADP (see inset, where “+” indicates the extent of the reaction in Fig. 2). Note that the rate of fluorescence change in the assay itself is faster than that produced upon incubation of the asymmetric complex with ATP (Fig. 2), allowing use of the coupled assay to determine a rate of ADP release from the asymmetric complex (see text).
Despite the use here of a mutant GroEL complex, D398A, to allow a single turnover report on the rate of ADP release from a discharging asymmetric GroEL/GroES complex, we expect the rate measurement would extrapolate to wild-type GroEL. This is based on two observations. First, the two complexes exhibit similar affinities for GroES in the presence of ADP. Second, the two complexes exhibit similar kinetics of ATP-mediated discharge of the GroES ligand, likely reflecting similar structural changes across the ring-ring interface and through the three domains of the discharging ring (see Supplemental Discussion). As a further comment, we note that in additional measurements of ADP release with the D398A system, neither the presence of trans-bound substrate protein (Rubisco or MDH) nor cis folding substrate (MDH) affected the rate of ADP release. Thus, in contrast with the step that precedes ATP-triggered dissociation of the asymmetric ADP complex, shown to be accelerated by substrate protein binding to the trans ring [2], the step of ATP-triggered dissociation of ADP does not appear to be sensitive to the presence of substrate protein.
Supplementary Material
Abbreviations
- DTT
dithiothreitol
- HEPES
N-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine-N′ -(2-ethanesulfonic acid)
- LDH
lactate dehydrogenase
- PEP
phosphoenol pyruvate
- PK
pyruvate kinase
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Rye HS, Burston SG, Fenton WA, Beechem JM, Xu Z, Sigler PB, Horwich AL. Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature. 1997;388:792–798. doi: 10.1038/42047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rye HS, Roseman AM, Furtak K, Fenton WA, Saibil HR, Horwich AL. GroEL-GroES cycling: ATP and non-native polypeptide direct alternation of folding-active rings. Cell. 1999;97:325–338. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80742-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yifrach O, Horovitz A. Nested cooperativity in the ATPase activity in the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry. 1995;34:9716–9723. doi: 10.1021/bi00016a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ranson NA, Farr GW, Roseman AM, Gowen B, Fenton WA, Horwich AL, Saibil HR. ATP-bound states of GroEL captured by cryo-electron microscopy. Cell. 2001;107:869–879. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00617-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tyagi N, Fenton WA, Horwich AL. GroEL/GroES cycling: ATP binds to an open ring before substrate protein favoring protein binding and production of the native state. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009 Nov. 13 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911556106. online: doi/10.1073/pnas.0911556106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Taniguchi M, Yoshimi T, Hongo K, Mizobata T, Kawata Y. Stopped-flow fluorescent analysis of the conformational changes in the GroEL apical domain. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:16368–16376. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M311806200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cliff MJ, Limpkin C, Cameron A, Burston SG, Clarke AR. Elucidation of steps in the capture of a protein substrate for efficient encapsulation by GroE. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:21266–21275. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M601605200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Horwich AL, Fenton WA. Chaperonin-mediated protein folding: using a central cavity to kinetically assist polypeptide chain folding. Q. Rev. Biophys. 2009;42:83–116. doi: 10.1017/S0033583509004764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Roseman AM, Chen S, White H, Braig K, Saibil HR. The chaperonin ATPase cycle: mechanism of allosteric switching and movements of substrate-binding domains in GroEL. Cell. 1996;87:241–251. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81342-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Weissman JS, Rye HS, Fenton WA, Beechem JM, Horwich AL. Characterization of the active intermediate of a GroEL-GroES-mediated folding reaction. Cell. 1996;84:481–490. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81293-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mayhew M, da Silva ACR, Martin J, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Hartl FU. Protein folding in the central cavity of the GroEL-GroES chaperonin complex. Nature. 1996;379:420–426. doi: 10.1038/379420a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Xu Z, Horwich AL, Sigler PB. The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL-GroES-(ADP)7 chaperonin complex. Nature. 1997;388:741–751. doi: 10.1038/41944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Motojima F, Chaudhry C, Fenton WA, Farr GW, Horwich AL. Substrate polypeptide presents a load on the apical domains of the chaperonin GroEL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:15005–15012. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406132101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Apetri AC, Horwich AL. Chaperonin chamber accelerates protein folding through passive action of preventing aggregation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:17351–17355. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809794105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ranson NA, Burston SG, Clarke AR. Binding, encapsulation and ejection: substrate dynamics during a chaperonin-assisted folding reaction. J. Mol. Biol. 1997;266:656–664. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jackson GS, Staniforth RA, Halsall DJ, Atkinson T, Holbrook JJ, Clarke AR, Burston SG. Binding and hydrolysis of nucleotides in the chaperonin catalytic cycle: implications for the mechanism of assisted protein folding. Biochemistry. 1993;32:2554–2563. doi: 10.1021/bi00061a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Madan D, Lin Z, Rye HS. Triggering protein folding within the GroEL-GroES complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:32003–32013. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M802898200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kad NM, Ranson NA, Cliff MJ, Clarke AR. Asymmetry, commitment and inhibition in the GroE ATPase cycle impose alternating functions on the two GroEL rings. J. Mol. Biol. 1999;278:267–278. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Burston SG, Ranson NA, Clarke AR. The origins and consequences of asymmetry in the chaperonin reaction cycle. J. Mol. Biol. 1995;249:138–152. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Williamson JR, Corkey BE. Assays of intermediates of the citric acid cycle and related compounds by fluorometric enzyme methods. Meth. Enzymol. 1969;13:434–513. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



