Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care logoLink to Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care
. 1993:601–605.

Assessment of methodologic search filters in MEDLINE.

N L Wilczynski 1, C J Walker 1, K A McKibbon 1, R B Haynes 1
PMCID: PMC2850647  PMID: 8130545

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the retrieval characteristics of methodologic textwords and MeSH terms in MEDLINE for identifying methodologically sound studies on the etiology, prognosis, diagnosis, and prevention and treatment of disorders in general adult medicine. DESIGN: Comparison of methodologic search terms and phrases for the retrieval of citations in MEDLINE with a manual hand search of the literature (the gold standard) for 10 internal and general medicine journals for 1986 and 1991. MEASURES: Sensitivity (proportion of methodologically sound and correct topic studies retrieved) and specificity (proportion of unsound or wrong topic articles not retrieved) of the search strategies. RESULTS: The individual terms yielding the best sensitivity for 1991 by purpose category were: risk (tw) for etiology; exp cohort studies for prognosis; sensitivity (tw) for diagnosis; and clinical trial (pt) for treatment. The corresponding terms for 1986 were: risk (tw) for etiology; prognosis: (tw) for prognosis; sensitivity (tw) for diagnosis; and random: (tw) for treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of methodologic MeSH terms and textwords varied greatly in MEDLINE and changed from 1986 to 1991. More complex search strategies may be required to optimize retrieval.

Full text

PDF
601

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dickersin K., Hewitt P., Mutch L., Chalmers I., Chalmers T. C. Perusing the literature: comparison of MEDLINE searching with a perinatal trials database. Control Clin Trials. 1985 Dec;6(4):306–317. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(85)90106-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Haynes R. B., McKibbon K. A., Fitzgerald D., Guyatt G. H., Walker C. J., Sackett D. L. How to keep up with the medical literature: V. Access by personal computer to the medical literature. Ann Intern Med. 1986 Nov;105(5):810–816. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-105-5-810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kirpalani H., Schmidt B., McKibbon K. A., Haynes R. B., Sinclair J. C. Searching MEDLINE for randomized clinical trials involving care of the newborn. Pediatrics. 1989 Apr;83(4):543–546. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Poynard T., Conn H. O. The retrieval of randomized clinical trials in liver disease from the medical literature. A comparison of MEDLARS and manual methods. Control Clin Trials. 1985 Dec;6(4):271–279. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(85)90103-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care are provided here courtesy of American Medical Informatics Association

RESOURCES