Abstract
The BF3·OEt2-promoted nucleophilic substitution of α-aryl-α-ketophosphates to afford α,α-diaryl ketone products is described. Electron-rich α-ketophosphates perform best, with electron-neutral and electron-poor substrates also tolerated. The reaction is tolerant of a range of aromatic, heteroaromatic and non-aromatic nucleophiles, with yields ranging from 44-84%. Enantioenriched starting material yields racemic product, suggesting an SN1 pathway via an acylcarbenium ion.
α-Aryl carbonyl compounds have garnered considerable attention as synthetic targets, most notably in the chemical production of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Common drugs such as naproxen, ibuprofen, fluribiprofen, and dichlofenac all contain this moiety.1 The Pd(0)-catalyzed α-arylation of ketones, pioneered concurrently by Buchwald, Hartwig and Miura in 1997, has served as the premier route to these products.2,3 In recent years, this methodology has been expanded to include esters, amides, aldehydes, and lactones as carbonyl coupling partners in the presence of an aryl halide or triflate and a Bronsted base.4,5
The aforementioned transition metal-catalyzed routes take advantage of the conventional reactivity patterns of nucleophilic ketone enolates and electrophilic Pd(II) intermediates to arrive at α-arylated carbonyls. We wanted to observe whether formation of an Ar–Cα bond was possible through polarity reversal, or umpolung methodology6, with Friedel-Crafts alkylation occuring at an electrophilic α-carbon (Figure 1). Such a route could be envisioned from a substrate with a sufficient nucleofuge in place adjacent to the carbonyl functionality (Figure 2).
Figure 1.
Transition metal-catalyzed enolate arylation (top) and Friedel-Crafts alkylation via an umpolung strategy (bottom).
Figure 2.
Umpolung approach to α,α-dialkyl carbonyls.
An umpolung α-alkylation route has precedent. In 2004, Ready and Malosh described the copper-catalyzed cross-coupling of primary and secondary organozinc halides with α-chloroketones, providing α-branched ketones in high yields with inversion of configuration at the α-carbon.7 In 2008, Breit and Studte described a zinc-catalyzed stereospecific sp3-sp3 cross-coupling reaction involving alkyl Grignard reagents and α-hydroxy ester triflates.8 The umpolung alkylation route becomes especially attractive if the needed functionality (i.e. nucleofuge) can be directly installed in conjunction with another synthetic operation. In this context, we noted a potential connection to our previous work demonstrating that cyanide-catalyzed additions of acyl phosphonates to aldehydes provide α-keto phosphate products (Figure 2).9,10 Acyl phosphonates are easily prepared in one step via the Michaelis-Arbuzov reaction, rendering them a convenient acyl donor. The “phospha-benzoin” reaction forms a C–C bond and installs a potential nucleofuge in a concomitant fashion. In principle, α-substitution reactions are feasible directly on these benzoin products with no prior functional group manipulation required, distinguishing this cross-benzoin route from those conducted with aldehydes, acyl silanes, or benzils as acyl donors.11,12
We hypothesized that treating an α-ketophosphate with an appropriate Lewis acid could promote phosphate group ionization and generate an α-acylcarbenium ion that could be subsequently trapped by an arene nucleophile; such a method would provide a simple route to α,α-diaryl ketones. α-Acylcarbenium ions have been trapped in solution by treating α-halobenzyl ketones with AgSbF6 in the presence of phenol and methanol.13,14
We initially tested this reaction design by subjecting α-ketophosphate 1 to a number of readily available and inexpensive Lewis acids in the presence of anisole in CH2Cl2 (Table 1). We observed the desired product 2a regardless of the Lewis acid tried. Performing the reaction at elevated temperatures did not increase the yield for this substrate (entry 5, Table 1). The reaction was catalytic in Lewis acid. Product formation was seen in 59% yield when 10 mol % BF3·OEt2 was used (entry 6, Table 1); however, significantly longer reaction times and diminished yields for a number of different substrates led us to examine the reaction scope using a full equivalent of BF3·OEt2.
Table 1.
Initial Reaction Conditions for the Coupling of α-Ketophosphate 1 with Anisolea
![]() | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| entry | Lewis acid | solvent | yield (%)b |
| 1 | TiCl4 | CH2Cl2 | 66 |
| 2 | BF3·OEt2 | CH2Cl2 | 67 |
| 3 | TMSOTf | CH2Cl2 | 66 |
| 4 | ZnCl2 | CH2Cl2 | 66 |
| 5c | BF3·OEt2 | CH2Cl2 | 61 |
| 6d | BF3·OEt2 | CH2Cl2 | 59 |
| 7e | BF3·OEt2 | CHCl3 | 76 |
| 8 | BF3·OEt2 | CCl4 | 80 |
| 9 | BF3·OEt2 | CH3CN | 71 |
| 10 | BF3·OEt2 | (CH2)2Cl2 | 99 |
| 11 | BF3·OEt2 | benzene | 85 |
| 12 | BF3·OEt2 | 1,2-DME | 74 |
| 13 | BF3·OEt2 | toluene | 66 |
| 14-19f | BF3·OEt2 | f | 0 |
Reactions were performed on 0.15 mmol scale using 1.0 equiv of Lewis acid in CH2Cl2 (1.5 mL) at 23 °C for 5 h.
Isolated yields obtained after flash chromatography.
Reaction performed at 80 °C for 5 h.
Reaction performed on 0.15 mmol scale using 10 mol % catalyst loading.
entries 7-13 were performed on 0.0285 mmol scale using 100 mol % of BF3·OEt2 in the specified solvent (0.29 mL) at 23 °C for 5 h. Yields were calculated by 1H NMR with mesitylene as an internal standard.
entries 14-19: acetone, tBuOMe, Et2O, THF, DMF, DMA.
Reaction conditions with different solvents were also explored. Several polar aprotic solvents yielded no desired product, and only α-ketophosphate 1 was recovered (entries 14-19); strongly Lewis basic solvents quelled catalyst reactivity, but the reaction was tolerant of more moderate Lewis bases without competitive Ritter-type reactivity (entry 9). Arene alkylation proceeded in less polar solvents as well as chlorinated solvents, with 1,2-dichloroethane being superior (entry 10).
After initial optimization, we investigated the scope and generality of both nucleophile and α-ketophosphate electrophile in this transformation. Table 2 summarizes the range of nucleophiles employed in this system. Both aromatic and heteroaromatic nucleophiles were tolerated, (entries 1-3, 7-8, Table 2), with varying reaction times depending on the nucleophile employed. Several nonarene nucleophiles performed well in this system (entries 4-6, 9), most notably the potassium trifluoroborate styrenyl salt15 which added cleanly in acetonitrile at 90 °C when ZnCl2 was used as the Lewis acid, delivering the trans olefin in 60% yield (entry 4). This allowed for incorporation of a non-aryl sp2-hybridized carbon center at the α-position. TMSN3 was well tolerated under the reaction conditions, providing the α-azido ketone in 81% yield (entry 5). Silyl enol ether and acetylacetone addition were also feasible, delivering 1,4-diketone products in promising yields (entry 6 and 9).
Table 2.
Nucleophilic Substitution to 1a
![]() | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| entry | nucleophile | product | yield(%)b |
| 1 | PhOMe |
|
84 |
| 2 | PhOH |
|
72 |
| 3 | PhSH |
|
84 |
| 4 |
|
|
60c |
| 5d | TMSN3 |
|
81 |
| 6e |
|
|
70 |
| 7 | furan |
|
83 |
| 8f | p-xylene |
|
44 |
| 9g |
|
|
46 |
Reactions were performed on a 0.29 mmol scale using 1.0 equiv of BF3·OEt2 and 10.0 equiv of nucleophile at 23 °C in (CH2)2Cl2 (2.85 mL) unless otherwise noted.
Isolated yield after flash chromatography, results averaged over at least two trials
Reaction was performed in CH3CN (2.85 mL) at 90 °C in a teflon seal-capped vial using 1.0 equiv of ZnCl2 and 3.0 equiv of nucleophile.
Reaction was performed in CH2Cl2 (2.85 mL).
Reaction was performed at 80 °C in a teflon seal-capped vial using 1.0 equiv of ZnCl2.
Reaction performed in CH2Cl2.
Reaction was performed with 5.0 equiv of nucleophile.
Table 3 summarizes the scope of the electrophile with anisole as the nucleophile. Para-substituted aromatic substrates and heteroaromatic substrates were tolerated (entries 1 and 2, Table 3), and the alkylation also progressed in the absence of a strong electron-donating group on the ring (entries 3-5). Heating the reaction to 85 °C allowed for successful ionization of the α-phosphate group in the absence of an electron-donating aryl substituent. Elevated temperatures, when anisole was employed as the nucleophile, did result in trace ortho-addition product; however, this minor product was easily separated from the para-addition product using silica gel chromatography.
Table 3.
Scope of the α-Ketophosphatea
![]() | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| entry | R1 | R2 | temp (°C) |
time (h) |
% yield (product)b |
| 1c | Ph | 4-MeOPh | 23 | 5 | 73 (3a) |
| 2 | Ph | 2-thienyl | 23 | 1.5 | 48 (3b) |
| 3d,e | Ph | 2-naphthyl | 85 | 3.5 | 61 (3c) |
| 4d,f | Ph | 4-ClPh | 85 | 17 | 51 (3d) |
| 5d,f | Ph | Ph | 85 | 17 | 54 (3e) |
| 6 | 4-ClPh | 4-MeOPh | 23 | 0.5 | 71 (3f) |
Reactions were performed on a 0.29 mmol scale using 1.0 equiv of BF3·OEt2 and 10.0 equiv of anisole in (CH2)2Cl2 (2.85 mL) unless otherwise noted.
Isolated yield after column chromatography, results averaged over at least two trials.
Reaction performed in DCM.
Reaction performed in a teflon seal-capped vial.
ortho-addition product isolated in 7% yield.
ortho-addition product isolated in 8% yield.
The relatively equal success of a number of Lewis acids (Table 1, entries 1-4) in the initial arene alkylation screen led us to question whether the dialkyl phosphoric acid generated as a by-product in the reaction was the true promoter of this transformation. To test this, 1 was subjected to a full equivalent of analogous dibutyl phosphoric acid and 10 equivalents of anisole in (CH2)2Cl2 (Figure 3). Little desired product was observed upon heating the reaction to 80 °C for 22 hours (<2% yield), allowing us to rule out the dialkyl phosphoric acid by-product as the reaction promoter.
Figure 3.
Control Experiments: a) Dialkyl phosphoric acid does not promote this reaction. b) Enantioenriched starting material yields racemic product.
When enantioenriched α-ketophosphate 48 was treated with furan (10 equiv) and BF3·OEt2 (1 equiv) in CH2Cl2 at 23 °C (Figure 3), the enantiomeric ratio of the resultant product was 50:50, thus suggesting an SN1 mechanistic pathway that proceeded through a 2° acyl carbenium ion.
In summary, we have discovered a Lewis acid-promoted route to α,α-diaryl ketones that proceeds in one step from an easily prepared α-ketophosphate and invokes an umpolung strategy to induce arene alkylation at the α-carbon. The reaction proceeds at room temperature with sufficiently electron-rich α-ketophosphates; electron-neutral and electron-poor α-ketophosphates react upon heating. The cationic intermediate can be successfully trapped with both heteroatom and non-aromatic nucleophiles. Development of an asymmetric variant of this methodology is currently ongoing in our laboratory.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgement
This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (National Institute of General Medical Sciences – GM068443) and Novartis (Early Career Award to J.S.J.).
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures, spectroscopic and analytical data for all new compounds. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
- 1.Lloyd-Jones GC. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002;41:953–956. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20020315)41:6<953::aid-anie953>3.0.co;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.(a) Hamann BC, Hartwig J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997;119:12382–12383. [Google Scholar]; (b) Palucki M, Buchwald SL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997;119:11108–11109. [Google Scholar]; (c) Satoh T, Kawamura Y, Miura M, Nomura M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1997;36:1740–1742. [Google Scholar]
- 3.For an example of Pd(0)-catalyzed enolate vinylation, see: Piers E. J. Org. Chem. 1990;55:3454–3455.
- 4.For an α-arylation review, see: Culkin DA, Hartwig JF. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003;36:234–245. doi: 10.1021/ar0201106.
- 5.For selected examples in synthesis, see: Liu X, Hartwig JF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:5182–5191. doi: 10.1021/ja031544e. Martin R, Buchwald SL. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007;46:7236–7239. doi: 10.1002/anie.200703009. Hama T, Hartwig JF. Org. Lett. 2008;10:1549–1552. doi: 10.1021/ol800258u. Vo GD, Hartwig JF. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008;47:2127–2130. doi: 10.1002/anie.200705357. For alternative methods, see: Milne JE, Murry JA, King A, Larsen RD. J. Org. Chem. 2009;74:445–447. doi: 10.1021/jo8021499.
- 6.Seebach D. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1979;18:239–336. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Malosh CF, Ready JM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:12040–12041. doi: 10.1021/ja0467768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Studte C, Breit B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008;47:5451–5455. doi: 10.1002/anie.200800733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bausch CC, Johnson JS. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2005;347:1207–1211. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Demir AS, Reis O, Igdir AC, Esiringu I, Eymur S. J. Org. Chem. 2005;70:10584–10587. doi: 10.1021/jo051811u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Linghu X, Bausch CC, Johnson JS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:1833–1840. doi: 10.1021/ja044086y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Demir AS, Reis O. Tetrahedron. 2004;60:3803–3811. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Begue J-P, Charpentier-Morize M. Acc. Chem. Res. 1980;13:207–212. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kulkarni GC, Karmarkar SN, Kelkar SL, Wadia MS. Tetrahedron. 1988;16:5189–5198. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Molander GA, Bernardi CR. J. Org. Chem. 2002;67:8424–8429. doi: 10.1021/jo026236y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






