Abstract
Bottom-up control of supramolecular protein assembly can provide a therapeutic nanobiotechnology. We demonstrate that the pharmacological properties of insulin can be enhanced by design of “zinc staples” between hexamers. Paired (i, i+4) His substitutions were introduced at an α-helical surface. The crystal structure contains both classical axial zinc ions and novel zinc ions at hexamer-hexamer interfaces. Although soluble at pH 4, the combined electrostatic effects of the substitutions and bridging zinc ions cause isoelectric precipitation at neutral pH. Following subcutaneous injection in a diabetic rat, the analog effected glycemic control with a time course similar to that of long acting formulation Lantus®. Relative to Lantus, however, the analog discriminates at least 30-fold more stringently between the insulin receptor and mitogenic insulin-like growth factor receptor. Because aberrant mitogenic signaling may be associated with elevated cancer risk, such enhanced specificity may improve safety. Zinc stapling provides a general strategy to modify the pharmacokinetic and biological properties of a subcutaneous protein depot.
Keywords: Crystal Structure, Diabetes, Hormones, Protein Assembly, Zinc
Introduction
Supramolecular chemistry envisages the construction of novel materials and nanoscale devices ranging from molecular sensors to stimulus-responsive polymers (1, 2). Spatial organization may be achieved either by templating (design from the top down) or through self-assembly of molecular components (bottom up). Connective tissue provides an example of the bottom-up design of a biomaterial based on hierarchical self-assembly of the collagen triple helix. Can such general principles be exploited in pharmacology? The present study explores the application of protein engineering (3) to the supramolecular chemistry of a therapeutic subcutaneous depot. Bottom-up control is accomplished by the pH-dependent binding of metal ions within and between self-assembled structures.
A model is provided by insulin, a protein containing two chains, A (21 residues) and B (30 residues) (Fig. 1A) (4). The hormone is protected from misfolding in β-cells by Zn2+-stabilized assembly and microcrystallization (5). Storage hexamers dissociate on secretion, enabling insulin to function as a dilute zinc-free monomer. Zn2+-stabilized hexamers are also employed in pharmaceutical formulations to delay insulin degradation (6). Treatment of diabetes mellitus increasingly employs insulin analogs with altered pharmacokinetics (7). Such pharmacokinetic “tuning” has enabled more effective glycemic control. Two classes of analogs extend the properties of wild-type formulations. More rapid acting analogs are designed to limit self-assembly (8) or accelerate disassembly (9). Longer acting analogs are designed to promote self-assembly in the subcutaneous depot (10) or retard disassembly (11, 12). These classes each exploit an inverse relationship between the size of a subcutaneous protein complex and rate of capillary absorption (8, 9, 12).
FIGURE 1.
Sequence and structure of insulin analogs. A, insulin sequence and sites of modification in insulin glargine (Lantus) (upper panel) and the present analog (lower panel). Wild-type A- and B-chains are shown in black and green, and disulfide bridges (A6–A11, A7–B7, and A20–B19) are shown as black lines. Glargine contains a 2-residue B-chain extension (ArgB31 and ArgB32) and substitution AsnA21 → Gly (upper panel, red). Endogenous subcutaneous proteases may slowly remove one or both Arg residues, in part alleviating its augmented mitogenicity (31). The present analog contains substitutions GluA4 → His and ThrA8 → His (lower panel, red). Long acting analog insulin detemir (Levemir®, Novo-Nordisk) operates by attachment of an albumin-binding element (not shown) (32). B, ribbon model of insulin monomer depicting the portion of putative zinc-binding site (violet) formed by HisA4 and HisA8 (red) at the external surface of A1–A8 α-helix. A- and B-chain ribbons are shown in black and green. C and D, structures of wild-type (C) and variant (D) T3R3f insulin hexamers. The two axial zinc ions within each hexamer are aligned at the center (violet), coordinated by trimer-related HisB10 side chains (light gray). The variant hexamer contains three non-classical zinc ions at T3 trimer surface (D, magenta spheres). Shown in red are side chains of HisA4, HisA8, and the third HisA4′ from the adjoining hexamer. In each case, the A-chains are shown in black, and B-chains are in green or blue (Rf-specific B1–B8 α-helix). The wild-type structure was obtained from the Protein Data bank (entry 1TRZ). E, 2Fo − Fc electron density map (stereo pair contoured at 1 σ) showing a novel zinc-binding site formed by HisA4 and HisA8 in the T-state protomer. Distorted tetrahedral coordination is completed by residue A4′, which belongs to an Rf-state protomer in adjoining hexamer.
Although insulin is highly soluble at pH values >7 or <5, between these limits the protein reversibly undergoes isoelectric precipitation (13). This property underlies the design of long acting analog insulin glargine (the active ingredient of Lantus®) (12). Its B-chain is extended by paired Arg residues (Fig. 1A, top, red) whose positively charged side chains shift the pI from 5.8 to 7.0 (11, 12). Lantus is formulated at pH 4 as a clear unbuffered solution that, following subcutaneous injection, undergoes pH-dependent precipitation to form a slow release depot (11). Insulin glargine exhibits increased cross-binding to the type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF-1R),3 a homolog of the insulin receptor (IR) (12, 14). Augmented mitogenic signaling inhibits apoptosis and can drive the proliferation of cancer cells (14). The impaired specificity of the analog has thus raised safety concerns (15). A recent clinical case control study of Lantus reported a dose-dependent increase in IGF-1R-related malignancies (16). This statistical analysis and its clinical implications have provoked intense debate.4
We present a new strategy for design of long acting depots: engineered “zinc staples” between protein assemblies. The essential idea envisaged a zinc-dependent switch between an insoluble subcutaneous depot and a soluble metabolic signal. To implement this strategy, paired His substitutions (GluA4 → His and ThrA8 → His; Fig. 1A, bottom) were introduced at positions (i, i+4) of an α-helix (Fig. 1B), thus recapitulating part of a Zn2+-binding site (17). Such paired His elements are ubiquitous among classical zinc fingers (supplemental Fig. S1). Positions A4 and A8 were chosen as sites of modification to avoid structural perturbation, preserve activity (18), and maintain classical zinc assembly (4, 19). Choice of this A-chain α-helix was further motivated by potentially favorable effects of its modification on the ratio of IR:IGF-1R binding (20, 21). Zinc-stapled insulin hexamers exemplify a structure-based approach to the design of a subcutaneous protein depot. The stringent receptor selectivity and supramolecular assembly of the analog may enhance the safety and efficacy of insulin therapy.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Materials
Insulin was provided by Novo-Nordisk (Bagsværd, Denmark). Insulin glargine was obtained from Lantus (Sanofi-Aventis, Paris, France). Reagents for peptide synthesis were as described (22).
Synthesis of Insulin Analog
Variant insulin chains were prepared by solid-phase synthesis (22). Wild-type S-sulfonate B-chain derivatives were obtained by oxidative sulfitolysis of insulin (23). Insulin analogs were prepared by chain combination and purified as described (22, 23). The paired His A-chain substitutions were also incorporated into engineered monomer DKP-insulin (HisB10 → Asp, ProB28 → Lys, and LysB29 → Pro) (24). Yields were similar to that of wild-type insulin. Predicted molecular masses were confirmed by mass spectrometry.
Biochemical Assays
The effects of the substitutions on pI relative to insulin and insulin glargine were measured by native isoelectric-focusing gel electrophoresis (supplemental Methods). Solubility was tested in dilute HCl (pH 4.0) in the presence of 0.52 mm ZnCl2, 185 mm glycerol, and 25 mm meta-cresol and on dilution into a buffered solution of 10 mm Tris-HCl (pH 6–9) and 140 mm NaCl by the method of DiMarchi and co-workers (20) (supplemental Methods).
Crystallography
Crystals were obtained by hanging-drop vapor diffusion at room temperature in the presence of a 1:1.7 ratio of Zn2+:protein monomer and a 3.5:1 ratio of phenol:protein monomer in Tris-HCl (25). Diffraction was observed using synchrotron radiation at a wavelength between 1.0000 and 1.2398 Å at the Advanced Light Source (beamline 4.2.2; Berkeley, CA); crystals were flash-frozen to 100 K. The lattice contained one TRf dimer per asymmetric unit. The structure was determined by molecular replacement (supplemental Methods). Of the 86 residues in the refined model of the TRf dimer in the asymmetric unit (excluding 8 Gly, 2 Pro, and 6 end residues), 79 residues (92%) lie in the most favored Ramachandran region, and 7 residues (8%) lie in generously allowed regions.
1H-NMR Spectroscopy
Native self-assembly was prevented by “DKP” substitutions as described (24). Spectra of [HisA4, HisA8]DKP-insulin were acquired in D2O at 700 MHz and 25 °C. The analog was made 0.5 mm in 10 mm deuterated Tris-DCl (pD 7.6, direct meter reading) in the presence or absence of equimolar ZnCl2.
Receptor Binding Assays
IR (isoform B) and IGF-1R binding assays were performed by a microtiter plate antibody capture assay (supplemental Methods) (21). Wild-type insulin, insulin glargine, and IGF-I provided controls. Data were analyzed by non-linear regression using a two-site sequential model (21). The percentage of tracer bound in the absence of competing ligand was <15% to avoid ligand depletion artifacts.
Rodent Assay
Male Lewis rats (mean weight ∼300 g) were rendered diabetic by streptozotocin (26). The effects of insulin analogs on blood glucose concentration following subcutaneous injection were assessed using a clinical glucometer (Hypoguard Advance Micro-Draw meter) in relation to wild-type insulin or buffer alone (16 mg of glycerin, 1.6 mg of meta-cresol, 0.65 mg of phenol, and 3.8 mg of sodium phosphate (pH 7.4); Lilly diluent). Wild-type insulin and [HisA4, HisA8]insulin were made zinc-free in the above buffer. [HisA4, HisA8]insulin and insulin glargine were also dissolved in dilute HCl (pH 4) containing a 5.2:1 ratio of ZnCl2:insulin monomer, 25 mm meta-cresol, and 185 mm glycerol. Rats were injected subcutaneously with 3.44 nmol of insulin or insulin analogs (∼12–13.7 nmol) in 100 μl of buffer per rat (for wild-type insulin, this corresponds to 2 units/kg). For neutral zinc-free formulations, blood was obtained from the tail every 10 min from 0–90 min. For acidic zinc-containing formulations, blood was obtained at times 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10.8, and 24 h.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The pI of [HisA4, HisA8]insulin was found to be 6.6. Although highly soluble at pH 7.4 in the absence of zinc ions, the analog precipitated at Zn2+:insulin molar ratios above 0.4. Solubility was largely regained at pH values >8.5 at room temperature, presumably due to deprotonation of N-terminal α-amino groups. Such precipitation requires native protein assembly as 1H-NMR studies of an engineered monomeric analog (24) indicated that the paired His element does not bind equimolar Zn2+ in this context (supplemental Fig. S2). Lattice contacts between wild-type hexamers in insulin crystals provided a model for structural mechanisms of assembly-dependent zinc binding. The proximity of A4 and A8 side chains across such contact surfaces suggested that tetrahedral zinc-binding sites could be formed between successive [HisA4, HisA8]insulin hexamers. Novel A4–A8-mediated zinc coordination might therefore be possible near sites of bound interfacial water molecules in wild-type crystal lattices (Fig. 2A, blue spheres, shown in stereo in supplemental Fig. S3A).
FIGURE 2.
Zinc-stapled hexamers and biological activity. A, wild-type hexamer-hexamer packing. Left, in each hexamer, the upper trimer has T3 conformation, and the lower trimer has R3f conformation. Axial zinc ions are purple, and interfacial water molecules near residues A4 and A8 are blue. A-chains are shown in green, and B-chains are black. T and R protomers differ in B1–B9 secondary structure, extended (T) or helical (R); residues B1 and B2 are disordered in the “frayed” Rf-state. Right, expansion of boxed region at left. The violet sphere toward the bottom is the axial zinc ion of T3 trimer in the bottom hexamer. Brown arrows indicate Rf-state residues GluA4′ in the upper R3f trimer. B, zinc-stapled hexamer-hexamer packing of [HisA4, HisA8]insulin; the upper trimer has T3 conformation, and the lower trimer has R3f conformation. Axial zinc ions are violet, and A4–A8–A4′-coordinated zinc ions are magenta. A-chains are shown in green, and B-chains are in black. Right, expansion of the boxed region. Three novel zinc ions (magenta) are observed at the hexamer-hexamer interface. Brown arrows indicate the Rf-state side-chain HisA4′ (from the bottom trimer of the top hexamer), which completes the interfacial zinc-binding sites. C, Corey-Pauling-Koltun models showing T and Rf faces of [HisA4, HisA8]insulin hexamer (left and right). The view shown is rotated by 90° relative to panel B. The three non-classical zinc ions (magenta spheres) are shown bound to HisA4 and HisA8 (sticks). White crosses indicate the position of Cl− ions; the coloring scheme is otherwise as in panel B. D, stereo pair showing a non-classical zinc ion (magenta sphere), a Cl− ion (gray), and three bound water molecules (blue) in relation to HisA4′ (brown sticks) in the Rf protomer and HisA4-HisA8 (red) in the T protomer. The bound water molecules participate in a hydrogen-bond network within Rf involving the side-chain carboxylate of GluB4′, para-OH of TyrB26′, and carbonyl oxygen of ProB28′ (labeled). E, competitive displacement assays probing high affinity binding of insulin or insulin analogs to IR (left-hand three curves) and low affinity cross-binding to IGF-1R (right-hand three curves). In each group, wild-type insulin is shown in green, glargine is in blue, and [HisA4, HisA8]insulin is in red. The enhanced receptor binding selectivity of [HisA4, HisA8]insulin results from the leftward shift of its IR binding titration and rightward shift of its IGF-1R binding titration. Relative affinities and dissociation constants are provided in supplemental Table S4. Assays were performed in the absence of zinc ions. X, insulin; ■, insulin glargine; ▼, [HisA4, HisA8]insulin; B/Bo denotes ratio of bound tracer to maximally bound tracer. F, streptozotocin-induced diabetic male rats were injected subcutaneously with wild-type insulin (X, green line), insulin glargine (■, blue line), [HisA4, HisA8]insulin (▼, red line), or buffer control (Lilly diluent; ●, brown line). Doses at time 0 were 3.44 nmol of wild-type insulin (20 μg in 100-μl injection volume), 12 nmol of insulin glargine (corresponding to 2.0 units of Lantus), 13.7 nmol of [HisA4, HisA8]insulin, and 100 μl of protein-free buffer (Lilly diluent). Blood glucose concentration was measured from the tip of the tail at indicated times. Each analog was tested in five rats (mean ± S.E.); the experiment was performed twice with similar results. Rats were fed 6–8 h following injections.
To test this hypothesis, we determined the crystal structure of [HisA4, HisA8]insulin. Crystals were grown in the presence of Zn2+ and phenol to yield T3R3f hexamers (27). The structure was obtained by molecular replacement at 1.9 Å resolution (Table 1). The mode of hexamer assembly of the analog (Fig. 1D) is identical to that of wild-type insulin (Fig. 1C). Respective conformations of T and Rf protomers are essentially identical to those of wild-type insulin (supplemental Fig. S4 and supplemental Table S1). No transmitted perturbations occur at receptor-binding surfaces (4).
TABLE 1.
Data collection and refinement statistics
| [HisA4, HisA8]insulin | |
|---|---|
| Data collection | |
| Space group | R3 |
| Cell dimensions | |
| a, b, c (Å) | 78.09, 78.09, 36.40 |
| α, β, γ (°) | 90.00, 90.00, 120.00 |
| Resolution (Å) | 32.05-1.90 |
| Rsym or Rmerge | 0.057 (0.422)a |
| I/σI | 14.1 (3.0)a |
| Completeness (%) | 99.5 (100.0)a |
| Redundancy | 5.49 (5.43)a |
| Refinement | |
| Resolution (Å) | 32.05-1.90 |
| No. of reflections | 6475 (955) |
| Rwork/Rfree | 0.199/0.257 |
| No. of atoms | |
| Protein | 818 |
| Ligand/ion | 6 |
| Water | 82 |
| B-factors | |
| Protein | 42.28 |
| Ligand/ion | 29.03 |
| Water | 53.94 |
| r.m.s.b deviations | |
| Bond lengths (Å) | 0.008 |
| Bond angles (°) | 1.2 |
a Highest resolution shell is shown in parentheses.
b r.m.s., root mean square deviation.
Wild-type and variant hexamers each contain two axial zinc ions, one per T3 and R3f trimer (Fig. 1, C and D, overlaid violet spheres). Coordination at each site is mediated by trimer-related HisB10 side chains with distorted tetrahedral geometry (Fig. 2, C and D, light gray at center of hexamers, and supplemental Table S2). Stereo views of the variant TRf dimer in the asymmetric unit and of the zinc-binding surface of the T protomer are provided in supplemental Fig. S5. In the R3f trimer, the fourth ligand is a chloride ion; in the T3 trimer, this site (more exposed than in the R3f trimer) exhibits partial occupancy by either a chloride ion or a bound water molecule (supplemental Fig. S6). These features are consistent with wild-type structures (27). As is also observed in wild-type crystals grown under similar conditions, the R3f trimer contains three bound phenol molecules (not shown). The A4 and A8 substitutions thus do not block the TR transition (22), a classical model for the reorganization of insulin on receptor binding (4).
The variant T3R3f hexamer contains three additional trimer-related zinc ions at the T-state surfaces (Fig. 1, B and D, magenta spheres; see also supplemental Fig. S5). These novel zinc ions are coordinated in part by HisA4 and HisA8 at an interfacial site. Representative electron density at the peripheral zinc-binding site defines a distorted tetrahedral site (Fig. 1E, supplemental Table S2). Coordination is completed by a chloride ion and a “stapled” HisA4 side chain belonging to an Rf protomer of an adjoining hexamer (Fig. 1E, labeled A4′, and Fig. 2B, brown arrows). Views of the opposing T and Rf faces of adjoining hexamers are shown in Fig. 2C (90° rotated from the orientation shown in Fig. 2B). Binding of the chloride ion is stabilized by a network of three water molecules bound to the Rf protomer (Fig. 2D, blue spheres in stereo pairs); HisA8 in Rf is displaced from the zinc-binding site. The three non-classical zinc ions thus bridge the T3 and Rf3 trimers of adjacent hexamers (Fig. 2, B–D, magenta spheres, and in stereo in supplemental Fig. S3B), in part displacing water molecules ordinarily bound at the wild-type interface (Fig. 2A, blue spheres). N-Zn2+ bond distances and angles are similar to those of the axial metal ion-binding sites (supplemental Table S2). Side-chain conformations of HisA4 and HisA8 differ between T and Rf protomers (supplemental Table S3).
Studies of hormone binding to IR and IGF-1R were undertaken to assess relative affinities and receptor binding selectivity (Fig. 2E and supplemental Table S4). Ligands were characterized as zinc-free monomers. Relative to the binding of human insulin to IR and IGF-IR (Fig. 2E, solid and dotted green lines, respectively), insulin glargine (solid and dotted blue lines) exhibits 2-fold reduced affinity for IR and 3-fold enhanced affinity for IGF-1R. By contrast, [HisA4, HisA8]insulin exhibits native-like affinity for IR (Fig. 2E, solid red line) but 6-fold reduced affinity for IGF-1R (dotted red line shifted to right). Thus, although the receptor binding selectivity of insulin glargine is impaired by ∼6-fold, that of [HisA4, HisA8]insulin is enhanced by 7.5 (±2.5)-fold. This represents an improvement of >30-fold relative to insulin glargine.
The potency and duration of action of [HisA4, HisA8]insulin were tested in diabetic rats in relation to insulin glargine (Fig. 2F). Glycemic control by long acting insulin analogs in rodents (5–10 h) is less prolonged than in humans (18–24 h), presumably due to smaller depot sizes (28). [HisA4, HisA8]insulin and insulin glargine were dissolved (like Lantus) in dilute HCl (pH 4.0) with a Zn2+:insulin ratio of 5.2:1. The time course and extent of glycemic control were similar on injection of the two analogs (Fig. 2F, red and blue lines). A rapid acting control was provided by zinc-free human insulin in Lilly diluent (Fig. 2F, green line). Because the rats ate only at night, the effects of daytime insulin injections were influenced by diurnal fasting; controls were provided by injection of diluent alone (Fig. 2F, brown line). Control studies were also undertaken of [HisA4, HisA8]insulin in neutral zinc-free Lilly diluent; its time course was similar to that of wild-type insulin control (not shown). Zinc-free glargine was not tested at neutral pH due to its sparing solubility.
Isoelectric precipitation of [HisA4, HisA8]insulin at pH 7.4 is due to the combined effects of two electrostatic changes: removal of a wild-type negative charge by substitution GluA4 → His and the binding of three interfacial zinc ions per hexamer. Although insulin glargine contains 12 additional positive charges per hexamer, the net change in the formal charge of the [HisA4, HisA8] hexamer may be between 9 and 12, depending on the fractional Cl− occupancy at the fourth coordination site and indirect effects of protein modifications at other titratable sites (such as the α-amino group of GlyA1 and imidazole ring of HisB5). Although the present crystal structure provides a model for zinc-bridged self-association surfaces, the number and distribution of bound zinc ions may differ in a non-crystalline aggregate formed on injection. In the future, this issue may be addressed by biochemical characterization of the initial subcutaneous depot.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
The present study demonstrates the potential of interfacial zinc-binding sites, introduced by design (17, 29), to modify the pharmacokinetics of a protein in a subcutaneous depot. Such bottom-up control of assembly illustrates general principles of supramolecular chemistry and their application to nanobiotechnology (1, 2).
Optimal treatment of diabetes mellitus often requires combined use of fast and slow acting insulin analogs (7, 30). The principle of isoelectric precipitation underlies the prolonged action of insulin glargine, an analog in broad clinical use (Lantus) (11, 12, 30). Although slow release of zinc-free monomers enables basal metabolic regulation, concerns have been raised regarding IGF-1R-mediated mitogenicity (14) and possible dose-dependent cancer risk (15, 16). [HisA4, HisA8]insulin achieves slow release by formation of an insoluble hexamer stapled by interfacial zinc ions. Because the zinc-free monomer discriminates between IR and IGF-1R more stringently than wild-type insulin or existing analogs, this or related “second generation” analogs may enhance the safety of insulin therapy. Zinc stapling of insulin exemplifies a general strategy to modify the pharmacokinetic and biological properties of a subcutaneous protein depot. The engineering of novel lattice contacts in protein crystals can thus enable control of supramolecular assembly as a therapeutic protein nanotechnology.
Acknowledgments
We thank S. Wang and W. Jia for technical assistance.
This work was supported, in whole or in part, by National Institutes of Health Grant DK069764 (to M. A. W.). This work was also supported by grants from the American Diabetes Association (to N. B. P. and M. A. W.) and Dietrich Diabetes Research Institute (to N. B. P. and F. I.-B.). This article is a contribution from the Cleveland Center for Membrane and Structural Biology. M. A. W. is a founding shareholder of Thermalin Diabetes, Inc. (Cleveland, OH).
This article was selected as a Paper of the Week.
The atomic coordinates and structure factors (code 3KQ6) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (http://www.rcsb.org/).

The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Methods and references, supplemental Figs. S1–S6, and supplemental Tables S1–S4.
- IGF
- insulin-like growth factor
- IGF-1R
- type 1 IGF receptor
- IR
- insulin receptor
- DKP
- substitutions AspB10, LysB28, and ProB29.
REFERENCES
- 1.Whitesides G. M. (2003) Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 1161–1165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Albrecht M. (2007) Naturwissenschaften 94, 951–966 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Asuri P., Bale S. S., Karajanagi S. S., Kane R. S. (2006) Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 17, 562–568 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Baker E. N., Blundell T. L., Cutfield J. F., Cutfield S. M., Dodson E. J., Dodson G. G., Hodgkin D. M., Hubbard R. E., Isaacs N. W., Reynolds C. D. (1988) Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 319, 369–456 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dodson G., Steiner D. (1998) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 8, 189–194 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Brange J., Langkjaer L. (1997) Pharm. Biotechnol. 10, 343–409 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hirsch I. B. (2005) N. Engl. J. Med. 352, 174–183 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Brange J., Ribel U., Hansen J. F., Dodson G., Hansen M. T., Havelund S., Melberg S. G., Norris F., Norris K., Snel L. (1988) Nature 333, 679–682 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.DeFelippis M. R., Chance R. E., Frank B. H. (2001) Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Syst. 18, 201–264 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dodson G. G., Dodson E. J., Turkenburg J. P., Bing X. (1993) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 21, 609–614 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Campbell R. K., White J. R., Levien T., Baker D. (2001) Clin. Ther. 23, 1938–1957 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Le Roith D. (2007) Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 23, 593–599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Brange J. (1987) Galenics of Insulin: The Physico-chemical and Pharmaceutical Aspects of Insulin and Insulin Preparations, pp. 18–29, Springer-Verlag, Berlin [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mayer D., Shukla A., Enzmann H. (2008) Arch. Physiol. Biochem. 114, 38–44 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Smith U., Gale E. A. (2009) Diabetologia 52, 1699–1708 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hemkens L. G., Grouven U., Bender R., Günster C., Gutschmidt S., Selke G. W., Sawicki P. T. (2009) Diabetologia 52, 1732–1744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Regan L. (1993) Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 22, 257–287 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kristensen C., Kjeldsen T., Wiberg F. C., Schäffer L., Hach M., Havelund S., Bass J., Steiner D. F., Andersen A. S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 12978–12983 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wan Z., Xu B., Huang K., Chu Y. C., Li B., Nakagawa S. H., Qu Y., Hu S. Q., Katsoyannis P. G., Weiss M. A. (2004) Biochemistry 43, 16119–16133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kohn W. D., Micanovic R., Myers S. L., Vick A. M., Kahl S. D., Zhang L., Strifler B. A., Li S., Shang J., Beals J. M., Mayer J. P., DiMarchi R. D. (2007) Peptides 28, 935–948 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhao M., Wan Z. L., Whittaker L., Xu B., Phillips N. B., Katsoyannis P. G., Ismail-Beigi F., Whittaker J., Weiss M. A. (2009) J. Biol. Chem. 284, 32178–32187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wan Z. L., Huang K., Hu S. Q., Whittaker J., Weiss M. A. (2008) J. Biol. Chem. 283, 21198–21210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hu S. Q., Burke G. T., Schwartz G. P., Ferderigos N., Ross J. B., Katsoyannis P. G. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 2631–2635 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Weiss M. A., Hua Q. X., Lynch C. S., Frank B. H., Shoelson S. E. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 7373–7389 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wan Z. L., Xu B., Chu Y. C., Katsoyannis P. G., Weiss M. A. (2003) Biochemistry 42, 12770–12783 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Saker F., Ybarra J., Leahy P., Hanson R. W., Kalhan S. C., Ismail-Beigi F. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 274, E984–E991 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ciszak E., Smith G. D. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 1512–1517 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Schneider S., Weber R., Luippold G. (2004) Arzneimittelforschung 54, 842–846 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lu Y., Berry S. M., Pfister T. D. (2001) Chem. Rev. 101, 3047–3080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Baxter M. A. (2008) Acta Diabetol. 45, 253–268 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kuerzel G. U., Shukla U., Scholtz H. E., Pretorius S. G., Wessels D. H., Venter C., Potgieter M. A., Lang A. M., Koose T., Bernhardt E. (2003) Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 19, 34–40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Raskin P. (2007) Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am. 36, 21–32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pocock S. J., Smeeth L. (2009) Lancet 374, 511–513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


