Skip to main content
EMBO Reports logoLink to EMBO Reports
. 2010 Mar 12;11(4):292–298. doi: 10.1038/embor.2010.10

The Rac activator STEF (Tiam2) regulates cell migration by microtubule-mediated focal adhesion disassembly

Claire Rooney 1, Gavin White 1, Alicja Nazgiewicz 2, Simon A Woodcock 1, Kurt I Anderson 3, Christoph Ballestrem 2, Angeliki Malliri 1,a
PMCID: PMC2854589  PMID: 20224579

The Rac activator STEF (Tiam2) regulates cell migration by microtubule-mediated focal adhesion disassembly

In this paper the Malliri lab identifies the Rac activator STEF as a new player in focal adhesion disassembly, a process fundamental for cell motility. The authors provide evidence that STEF/Rac signalling is required for optimal targeting of focal adhesions by microtubules, which is linked to focal adhesion disassembly.

Keywords: focal adhesions, microtubules, Rac, STEF, Tiam2

Abstract

Focal adhesion (FA) disassembly required for optimal cell migration is mediated by microtubules (MTs); targeting of FAs by MTs coincides with their disassembly. Regrowth of MTs, induced by removal of the MT destabilizer nocodazole, activates the Rho-like GTPase Rac, concomitant with FA disassembly. Here, we show that the Rac guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) Sif and Tiam1-like exchange factor (STEF) is responsible for Rac activation during MT regrowth. Importantly, STEF is required for multiple targeting of FAs by MTs. As a result, FAs in STEF-knockdown cells have a reduced disassembly rate and are consequently enlarged. This leads to reduced speed of migration. Together, these findings suggest a new role for STEF in FA disassembly and cell migration through MT-mediated mechanisms.

Introduction

During processes such as embryogenesis, immune response and wound healing, the orchestrated movement of cells in a particular direction is essential and highly regulated, integrating signals controlling adhesion, polarity and the cytoskeleton. Deregulation of migration can lead to the formation of tumours and metastases. The small Rho-like GTPases Rac1, RhoA and Cdc42 control cell adhesion and migration through modulation of both actin and microtubule (MT) cytoskeletons (Watanabe et al, 2005; Ridley, 2006). Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs), which are activators of Rho GTPases, are also emerging as crucial regulators of these processes. The Rac-GEF T-lymphoma invasion and metastasis 1 (Tiam1) regulates cell migration through modulation of both cell–cell and cell–substrate adhesion (Woodcock et al, 2009). However, its closest family member Sif and Tiam1-like exchange factor (STEF; Hoshino et al, 1999) has not yet been implicated in these processes.

Assembly and disassembly of focal adhesions (FAs) are crucial processes during cell migration. These multi-molecular complexes attach the intracellular cytoskeleton to the extracellular matrix (Horwitz & Webb, 2003). So far, more than 150 components of FAs have been identified (Zaidel-Bar et al, 2007). Determining the mechanisms that regulate their formation and disassembly is crucial to furthering our understanding of cell migration. Whereas the mechanisms of FA disassembly are not completely understood, a clear role has emerged for FA kinase (FAK). FAK-deficient cells have large FAs owing to their impaired disassembly (Ilic et al, 1995; Webb et al, 2004). Furthermore, Src, extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) and myosin light chain (MLC) kinase have been implicated owing to their ability to rescue the impaired FA disassembly of FAK-deficient cells (Webb et al, 2004). Rho GTPases also regulate FA disassembly. FAK/Src signalling can phosphorylate and activate p190RhoGAP, decreasing Rho activity and reducing adhesion-associated stress fibres, which are dependent on the Rho effector ROCK. ROCK inhibition decreases FA size (Arthur et al, 2000; Schober et al, 2007). However, other signalling pathways must be involved, as inhibition of ROCK alone was not sufficient to restore FA disassembly rates in FAK-deficient fibroblasts (Webb et al, 2004).

The Rac effector p21-activated kinase (PAK) has also been implicated in FA disassembly. PAK localizes to focal complexes (Manser et al, 1997) where it phosphorylates the integral FA component paxillin, resulting in adhesion turnover (Nayal et al, 2006). Furthermore, PAK phosphorylates MLC kinase, resulting in its inactivation (Sanders et al, 1999). As myosin-mediated contractility is required for both FA assembly (Chrzanowska-Wodnicka & Burridge, 1996; Nayal et al, 2006) and disassembly (Crowley & Horwitz, 1995), tight regulation of actomyosin contractility is important for FA turnover.

MTs have also emerged as important regulators of FA disassembly. They target FAs and multiple targeting of FAs by MTs leads to the disassembly of FAs (Kaverina et al, 1998, 1999). However, the pathways involved in the targeting of FAs by MTs, and how this results in their disassembly, are poorly characterized. Recently, the spectraplakin ACF7 was identified as a molecule that crosslinks MTs and actin filaments, guiding MTs towards FAs before their disassembly (Wu et al, 2008). Additionally, dominant-negative dynamin inhibits MT-induced FA disassembly, suggesting that MTs can induce disassembly by dynamin-driven endocytosis. Disassembly driven in this way depends on a dynamin–FAK interaction (Ezratty et al, 2005), although FAK itself is not required for MT targeting of FAs (Schober et al, 2007).

There is increasing evidence of crosstalk between MTs and Rho GTPases. MT growth activates Rac (Waterman-Storer et al, 1999). Furthermore, Tiam1 regulates MT stability (Pegtel et al, 2007). In this study, we identify STEF as a new regulator of FA disassembly and show that it regulates both MT-dependent Rac activation and MT targeting of FAs. Consequently, inhibition of the STEF/Rac signalling module leads to impaired FA disassembly, with a concomitant reduction in cell migration.

Results And Discussion

STEF is required for optimal cell migration

To ascertain whether STEF has a role in cell migration, we used a doxycycline (dox)-inducible system to downregulate STEF in the skin papilloma cell line P1. This system encodes a short hairpin interfering RNA (shRNA), induced by the addition of dox (supplementary Fig S1 online), targeting transcripts for degradation by RNA interference (RNAi). STEF downregulation was assessed in cells expressing two different shRNA oligonucleotides—RNAi #1 and #2—and in control cells expressing a scrambled, non-targeting shRNA (Scr RNAi). The addition of dox to cells containing either STEF shRNA construct resulted in reduced STEF protein levels but did not affect STEF levels in scrambled control cells (Fig 1A,B). Tiam1 levels were unaffected by either STEF shRNA construct (Fig 1A).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

STEF is required for optimal cell migration. (A) STEF and Tiam1 protein levels in ScrRNAi, STEF RNAi #1 and STEF RNAi #2 cells treated with or without dox. Actin was a loading control. (B) Mean STEF protein levels from three or more independent experiments (±s.e.m.); *P<0.01, t-test. (C) A confluent monolayer of cells cultured in the presence (plus dox) or absence (control) of dox was wounded and the area of the wound was measured immediately after wounding and 24 h later. The percentage of wounds closed is presented for cells expressing the various shRNAs and is shown as the mean (±s.e.m.) of three independent experiments; *P<0.01, t-test. (D) The average speed of migrating single cells cultured in the presence or absence of dox ±s.e.m.; *P<0.01, t-test. (E) Rac activity in cells in the presence or absence of dox, plated sparsely or at confluence. The data shown are representative of three independent experiments. dox, doxycycline; RNAi, RNA interference; shRNA, short hairpin interfering RNA; STEF, Sif and Tiam1-like exchange factor; Tiam1, T-lymphoma invasion and metastasis 1.

The effect of STEF downregulation on cell migration was assessed by using a wound-healing assay. STEF-downregulated cells (plus dox) showed significantly reduced cell migration, closing on average 23% less of the wound as compared with control cells (Fig 1C). Furthermore, time-lapse analysis of sparsely plated cells showed that the average migration speed of individual STEF-downregulated cells was reduced by 30–45% (Fig 1D). To assess if STEF downregulation affects Rac activation in migrating cells, active Rac levels were determined in sparsely plated cells. Rac activity was reduced in STEF-downregulated cells (Fig 1E). However, when cells were plated at confluence, and therefore unable to migrate, no difference was observed (Fig 1E). Together, these data indicate that STEF is required for optimal migration of both wounded cell monolayers and individual P1 cells, and regulates the level of active Rac in migrating cells.

Rac activation by STEF controls FA size

A crucial element of cell migration is FA-mediated attachment to the substrate. There is increasing evidence of Rac involvement in FA regulation (Nayal et al, 2006; Chang et al, 2007). Hence, we considered that STEF downregulation results in deregulation of FAs, leading to the observed impaired migration. Immunostaining of migrating (leading edge) cells for a representative FA component, vinculin, showed that FAs in STEF-downregulated cells were larger than those in controls (Fig 2A). In both cases, vinculin-positive FAs were connected to actin stress fibres (supplementary Fig S2 online). Quantification—which excluded vinculin-positive small, dot-like focal complexes—showed that STEF downregulation induced a significant increase (40%) in the FA area (Fig 2B). Besides the increased FA area, the average cell area was significantly decreased (around 25%; Fig 2C), and the average number of FAs per cell was reduced by 50% (Fig 2D) in STEF-downregulated cells. Knockdown of Tiam1 in P1 cells did not affect the FA area (supplementary Fig S3 online).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Downregulation of STEF induces large focal adhesions. (A) Representative leading edge cells in the presence (plus dox) or absence (control) of dox immunostained with anti-vinculin to label FAs. Scale bars, 12 μm. (BD) The average FA area of individual adhesions (B), the average cell area (C) and the average number of FAs per cell (D) in the control and STEF-downregulated cells. The data are presented as the mean (±s.e.m.) of 30 cells from three independent experiments; *P<0.05, t-test. dox, doxycycline; FA, focal adhesion; RNAi, RNA interference; STEF, Sif and Tiam1-like exchange factor.

We next tested whether the FA phenotype was due to the Rac-GEF activity of STEF. Previously, two point mutations in Tiam1 were shown to abolish its Rac-GEF activity (Tolias et al, 2005); therefore, we mutated the corresponding residues in STEF to alanine. GEF-mutant STEF (EGFP-ΔN-STEF-GEF*) was unable to activate Rac (Fig 3A). Furthermore, expression of this mutant in P1 cells led to increased FA area (Fig 3B,C), comparable to the effects of STEF downregulation in P1 cells, suggesting that the GEF-mutant STEF is dominant-negative. By contrast, expression of an amino-terminally truncated form of STEF (ΔN-STEF), known to be constitutively active (Hoshino et al, 1999), increased active Rac levels (Fig 3A) and reduced the FA area (Fig 3B,C). Together, these data indicate that STEF regulates the size of FAs through Rac.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Rac activation by STEF controls focal adhesion size. (A) Rac activity was measured in Cos-7 cells transfected with control EGFP, EGFP-ΔN-STEF or ΔN-STEF-GEF-mutant (EGFP-ΔN-STEF-GEF*) plasmids. (B) P1 cells transfected with the indicated constructs were immunostained with anti-vinculin. Scale bars, 12 μm. (C) The average FA area of P1 cells transfected with the indicated constructs. Data presented are the mean (±s.e.m.) of 30 cells from three independent experiments; *P<0.001, t-test. EGFP, enhanced green fluorescence protein; FA, focal adhesion; GEF, guanine nucleotide exchange factor; GFP, green fluorescent protein; STEF, Sif and Tiam1-like exchange factor.

STEF regulates FA disassembly

The increased size of FAs led us to consider that FA disassembly kinetics might be reduced after STEF downregulation. Control or STEF-downregulated P1 cells at the wound edge were microinjected with paxillin-GFP (paxillin is an integral FA protein), and analysed subsequently by fluorescence time-lapse microscopy. The adhesions of control cells completely disassembled in the timeframe of the experiment, whereas they persisted in STEF-downregulated cells (Fig 4A,B). The rates of FA disassembly of individual adhesions were determined. The average rate constant for disassembly of adhesions in control cells was (5.7±0.7) × 10−2 min−1, whereas in STEF-downregulated cells it was significantly lower at (3.2±0.5) × 10−2 min−1 (Fig 4C). This suggests that the increased FA size observed in STEF-downregulated cells is the result of impaired FA disassembly. Furthermore, we infer that this underlies the defect in cell migration after STEF knockdown.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

STEF is required for focal adhesion disassembly. (AC) Wound edge cells cultured in the presence (plus dox) or absence (control) of dox were microinjected with paxillin-EGFP. (A) Representative fluorescence images. (B) Boxed areas in (A) shown over time. (C) The average disassembly rate (min−1) of FAs in control and STEF-downregulated cells. Data presented are the mean (±s.e.m.) of more than 20 individual FAs; *P<0.005, t-test. dox, doxycycline; EGFP, enhanced green fluorescence protein; FA, focal adhesion; RNAi, RNA interference; STEF, Sif and Tiam1-like exchange factor.

STEF levels do not regulate ERK, MLC kinase and RhoA

The regulation of FA disassembly is poorly understood. However, a few proteins, including ERK, MLC kinase and Rho, have been implicated (Webb et al, 2004). Therefore, we determined whether STEF/Rac signalling regulates these molecules in migrating cells. However, we did not detect any differences in ERK and MLC phosphorylation, or Rho activity, in STEF-downregulated cells plated sparsely (supplementary Fig S4A,B online). Increases in phospho-ERK, phospho-MLC and Rho activity were, however, detected in cells treated with the MT-disrupting agent nocodazole, which is known to induce large, stabilized FAs (Bershadsky et al, 1996; Liu et al, 1998) and was a positive control in these assays (supplementary Fig S4A,B online).

STEF mediates MT-dependent activation of Rac

Targeting of FAs by growing MTs coincides with their disassembly (Kaverina et al, 1998, 1999; Ezratty et al, 2005; Wu et al, 2008). Furthermore, MT growth, induced by nocodazole washout, activates Rac (Waterman-Storer et al, 1999). Additionally, Rac through PAK is implicated in FA turnover (Nayal et al, 2006). Given that in STEF-downregulated migrating cells we observed decreased Rac activity and impaired FA disassembly, we considered that STEF might mediate MT-dependent Rac activation. To test this, we performed nocodazole washout experiments followed by Rac activity measurements. As expected, in control cells we observed increased Rac activation after nocodazole washout (that is, MT regrowth); however, this was not apparent in STEF-downregulated cells (Fig 5A). In addition, expression of the GEF-mutant STEF in P1 cells impaired Rac activation in response to MT regrowth (Fig 5B).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

STEF is required for microtubule-dependent activation of Rac and multiple targeting of focal adhesions by microtubules. (A) Cells in the presence (plus dox) or absence (control) of dox were treated with 10 μM nocodazole (NZ) for 4 h. Rac activity was measured 0, 30 and 60 min after NZ washout. Rac activity was quantified from three independent experiments. (B) P1 cells infected with either empty vector or GEF-mutant STEF (ΔN-STEF-GEF*) were treated as in (A) and Rac activity was measured. Anti-HA shows expression levels of GEF-mutant STEF. The data shown are representative of three experiments. (C) Cells were treated as in (A), fixed at the time points indicated and immunostained for vinculin and tubulin. Scale bars, 12 μm. (D) FA size was determined in control and STEF-downregulated cells at 0 and 60 min after NZ washout. Data presented are the mean (±s.e.m.) of 30 cells from three experiments; *P<0.001, t-test. (E) Wound edge cells were microinjected with mCherry-paxillin (red) and pEGFP-β-tubulin (green). Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy time-lapse images were recorded at 5 s intervals for 10 min. Representative negative contrast images from control and STEF-downregulated cells, and a coloured image of the first time point in each case, are shown. MTs targeting FAs are indicated by the black arrows in the control time-lapse image. Scale bars, 1 μm. (F) FAs targeted more than once in the 10 min time-lapse period. *P<0.05, Mann–Whitney test. Data shown are the culmination of more than 50 adhesions from more than 20 cells. dox, doxycycline; FA, focal adhesion; GEF, guanine nucleotide exchange factor; HA, haemagglutinin; MT, microtubule; STEF, Sif and Tiam1-like exchange factor.

To determine whether the effect of STEF downregulation on Rac activation is specific for MT-dependent Rac stimulation or a general defect, we induced Rac activation with epidermal growth factor (EGF) in P1 cells. Here, STEF-downregulated cells and control cells were equally capable of activating Rac and inducing membrane ruffling (supplementary Fig S5A,B online). This indicates that STEF-downregulated cells are not inherently defective in Rac activation. Together, these data show that STEF is required for Rac activation, through its Rac-GEF activity, specifically after MT regrowth.

STEF regulates MT-mediated FA disassembly

MT regrowth, induced by nocodazole washout, reduces FA size (Ezratty et al, 2005). We therefore examined FA size during the nocodazole washout experiment. As anticipated, FA size increased in all cells treated with nocodazole (Fig 5C). Significantly, whereas washout of nocodazole (that is, MT regrowth) in control cells resulted in the expected diminution of FAs, in STEF-downregulated cells FAs remained stable (Fig 5C,D). MT regrowth was not affected by STEF downregulation (Fig 5C), indicating that STEF is required specifically for the process of FA disassembly after MT regrowth.

As the effects of STEF, with respect to Rac activity and FA regulation, are linked closely to MTs, we next examined whether STEF is required for optimal MT targeting of FAs, a process linked with their disassembly (Kaverina et al, 1998, 1999). To study MT targeting of FAs, we performed total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy on cells coexpressing pEGFP-β-tubulin (to label MTs) and mCherry-paxillin (to label FAs), as we have done previously (Krylyshkina et al, 2003). Time-lapse images show that whereas MTs target FAs in control cells, they fail to optimally target FAs in STEF-downregulated cells (Fig 5E). As multiple targeting events are associated with FA disassembly (Kaverina et al, 1998, 1999), the number of MT targeting events—defined as the extension of a MT into an adhesion site, so that the two can no longer be resolved—during a 10 min time-lapse video were quantified for individual FAs in control and STEF-downregulated cells. Overall, a significantly lower percentage of adhesions were targeted more than once in STEF-downregulated cells (40%) when compared with control cells (61%; Fig 5F). Together, these data indicate that STEF is required for multiple targeting of MTs to FAs, which in turn facilitates their disassembly.

In conclusion, we have shown that STEF regulates FA disassembly and consequently cell migration. We found that the FAs in STEF-downregulated cells were enlarged, reminiscent of those induced by nocodazole treatment (Bershadsky et al, 1996). We therefore examined the role of MTs downstream from STEF/Rac signalling in FA disassembly. It has been shown that active Rac promotes the growth of MTs into the lamellipodium by modulating the MT plus-tip protein Clasp2 (Wittmann et al, 2003; Wittmann & Waterman-Storer, 2005). It has also been shown that MT growth, induced by washout of nocodazole, activates Rac (Waterman-Storer et al, 1999). In conjunction with these previous findings, the data presented here support the idea that STEF/Rac signalling regulates the growth of MTs towards specific sites, such as FAs. Collectively, the data also suggest the presence of a positive-feedback loop in which MTs activate STEF to activate Rac. This active Rac then promotes the targeted growth of MTs towards FAs, hence perpetuating the Rac activation signal and the multiple-targeting of MTs at these specific sites. In terms of FA disassembly, localized activation of Rac would allow the recruitment of Rac effector(s)—such as PAK (Nayal et al, 2006)—to FAs, promoting their disassembly. It would be interesting in the future to determine the pathway downstream from STEF/Rac that leads to targeting and disassembly of FAs as well as the mechanism by which MTs activate the STEF/Rac module.

Methods

Cell culture. Cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum. shRNA-expressing cells were maintained in DMEM with 10% tetracycline-free fetal bovine serum and 400 μg/ml G418. The cells were transfected using Fugene6 (Roche Diagnostics, Burgess Hill, UK), and retrovirally transduced as described previously (Woodcock et al, 2009). For nocodazole washout experiments, cells were plated on glass-bottom dishes coated with fibronectin (10 μg/ml; Sigma, Poole, UK) and serum-starved for 24 h. Nocodazole (Sigma) was added at a final concentration of 10 μM for 4 h, washed out and cells were processed for immunofluorescence or lysed to assess Rac activity, as described in the supplementary information online.

Antibodies. Immunoblotting and immunofluorescence were performed as described previously (Woodcock et al, 2009), using antibodies listed in the supplementary information online.

FA disassembly assay. Wound edge cells microinjected with pEGFP-paxillin were visualized with a time-lapse imaging system. The images were collected at 100 ms exposures for 3 h at 5 min intervals. The intensity of individual adhesions was determined over time by using the ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) and disassembly rate was determined as previously described previously (Webb et al, 2004).

Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy to visualize targeting of FAs by MTs was performed as described previously (Krylyshkina et al, 2003); further details are available in the supplementary information online. From videos, targeting events were counted for several individual FAs.

Supplementary information is available at EMBO reports online (http://www.emboreports.org).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
embor201010-s1.pdf (9.9MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We thank M. Hoshino, V. Allen, M. Humphries and J. Collard for reagents; A. Welman for assistance in generating the inducible shRNA vector; S. Bagley for assistance with microscopy and A. Hurlstone for critically reading the paper. C.B. acknowledges the Bioimaging Facility of the Faculty of Life Sciences (The University of Manchester) for support, and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/G004552/1) for funding. This work was supported by Cancer Research UK grant C147/A6058 to A.M.

Footnotes

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Arthur WT, Petch LA, Burridge K (2000) Integrin engagement suppresses RhoA activity via a c-Src-dependent mechanism. Curr Biol 10: 719–722 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bershadsky A, Chausovsky A, Becker E, Lyubimova A, Geiger B (1996) Involvement of microtubules in the control of adhesion-dependent signal transduction. Curr Biol 6: 1279–1289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chang F, Lemmon CA, Park D, Romer LH (2007) FAK potentiates Rac1 activation and localization to matrix adhesion sites: a role for βPIX. Mol Biol Cell 18: 253–264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chrzanowska-Wodnicka M, Burridge K (1996) Rho-stimulated contractility drives the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions. J Cell Biol 133: 1403–1415 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Crowley E, Horwitz AF (1995) Tyrosine phosphorylation and cytoskeletal tension regulate the release of fibroblast adhesions. J Cell Biol 131: 525–537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ezratty EJ, Partridge MA, Gundersen GG (2005) Microtubule-induced focal adhesion disassembly is mediated by dynamin and focal adhesion kinase. Nat Cell Biol 7: 581–590 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Horwitz R, Webb D (2003) Cell migration. Curr Biol 13: R756–R759 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hoshino M, Sone M, Fukata M, Kuroda S, Kaibuchi K, Nabeshima Y, Hama C (1999) Identification of the stef gene that encodes a novel guanine nucleotide exchange factor specific for Rac1. J Biol Chem 274: 17837–17844 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ilic D, Furuta Y, Kanazawa S, Takeda N, Sobue K, Nakatsuji N, Nomura S, Fujimoto J, Okada M, Yamamoto T (1995) Reduced cell motility and enhanced focal adhesion contact formation in cells from FAK-deficient mice. Nature 377: 539–544 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kaverina I, Rottner K, Small JV (1998) Targeting, capture, and stabilization of microtubules at early focal adhesions. J Cell Biol 142: 181–190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kaverina I, Krylyshkina O, Small JV (1999) Microtubule targeting of substrate contacts promotes their relaxation and dissociation. J Cell Biol 146: 1033–1044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Krylyshkina O, Anderson KI, Kaverina I, Upmann I, Manstein DJ, Small JV, Toomre DK (2003) Nanometer targeting of microtubules to focal adhesions. J Cell Biol 161: 853–859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu BP, Chrzanowska-Wodnicka M, Burridge K (1998) Microtubule depolymerization induces stress fibers, focal adhesions, and DNA synthesis via the GTP-binding protein Rho. Cell Adhes Commun 5: 249–255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Manser E, Huang HY, Loo TH, Chen XQ, Dong JM, Leung T, Lim L (1997) Expression of constitutively active α-PAK reveals effects of the kinase on actin and focal complexes. Mol Cell Biol 17: 1129–1143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nayal A, Webb DJ, Brown CM, Schaefer EM, Vicente-Manzanares M, Horwitz AR (2006) Paxillin phosphorylation at Ser273 localizes a GIT1–PIX–PAK complex and regulates adhesion and protrusion dynamics. J Cell Biol 173: 587–589 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pegtel DM, Ellenbroek SI, Mertens AE, van der Kammen RA, de Rooij J, Collard JG (2007) The Par–Tiam1 complex controls persistent migration by stabilizing microtubule-dependent front-rear polarity. Curr Biol 17: 1623–1634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ridley AJ (2006) Rho GTPases and actin dynamics in membrane protrusions and vesicle trafficking. Trends Cell Biol 16: 522–529 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sanders LC, Matsumura F, Bokoch GM, de Lanerolle P (1999) Inhibition of myosin light chain kinase by p21-activated kinase. Science 283: 2083–2085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schober M, Raghavan S, Nikolova M, Polak L, Pasolli HA, Beggs HE, Reichardt LF, Fuchs E (2007) Focal adhesion kinase modulates tension signaling to control actin and focal adhesion dynamics. J Cell Biol 176: 667–680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tolias KF, Bikoff JB, Burette A, Paradis S, Harrar D, Tavazoie S, Weinberg RJ, Greenberg ME (2005) The Rac1-GEF Tiam1 couples the NMDA receptor to the activity-dependent development of dendritic arbors and spines. Neuron 45: 525–538 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Watanabe T, Noritake J, Kaibuchi K (2005) Regulation of microtubules in cell migration. Trends Cell Biol 15: 76–83 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Waterman-Storer CM, Worthylake RA, Liu BP, Burridge K, Salmon ED (1999) Microtubule growth activates Rac1 to promote lamellipodial protrusion in fibroblasts. Nat Cell Biol 1: 45–50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Webb DJ, Donais K, Whitmore LA, Thomas SM, Turner CE, Parsons JT, Horwitz AF (2004) FAK-Src signalling through paxillin, ERK and MLCK regulates adhesion disassembly. Nat Cell Biol 6: 154–161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wittmann T, Waterman-Storer CM (2005) Spatial regulation of CLASP affinity for microtubules by Rac1 and GSK3β in migrating epithelial cells. J Cell Biol 169: 929–939 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wittmann T, Bokoch GM, Waterman-Storer CM (2003) Regulation of leading edge microtubule and actin dynamics downstream of Rac1. J Cell Biol 161: 845–851 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Woodcock SA, Rooney C, Liontos M, Connolly Y, Zoumpourlis V, Whetton AD, Gorgoulis VG, Malliri A (2009) Src-induced disassembly of adherens junctions requires localized phosphorylation and degradation of the Rac activator Tiam1. Mol Cell 33: 639–653 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wu X, Kodama A, Fuchs E (2008) ACF7 regulates cytoskeletal-focal adhesion dynamics and migration and has ATPase activity. Cell 135: 137–148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Zaidel-Bar R, Itzkovitz S, Ma'ayan A, Iyengar R, Geiger B (2007) Functional atlas of the integrin adhesome. Nat Cell Biol 9: 858–867 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
embor201010-s1.pdf (9.9MB, pdf)

Articles from EMBO Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES