Timely reperfusion is mandatory for salvage of ischemic myocardium from irreversible damage. However, reperfusion induces damage per se, i.e. reperfusion injury contributes to final infarct size [1]. Ischemic postconditioning, i.e. brief episodes of intermittent coronary re-occlusion during early reperfusion, reduces infarct size. This protective effect was confirmed in all species tested so far [2], including humans [3], but common co-morbidities of ischemic heart disease may interfere with cardioprotective mechanisms including ischemic postconditioning [4].
The signal transduction of ischemic postconditioning is still unclear in detail [5]. Activation of “reperfusion injury salvage kinases” (RISK) is causal for ischemic postconditioning’s protection in rodents [6]. In pigs, in which coronary anatomy and the spatial and temporal development of myocardial infarction are closer to that of humans, RISK activation is not mandatory for protection [7].
The mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) is a potential end-effector of myocardial protection at reperfusion [8–10]. Cyclosporine A binds to cyclophilin D, inhibits mPTP opening and reduces infarct size [9, 11]. Apart from experiments in rodents, cyclosporine A when given at reperfusion reduced infarct size in a proof-of-concept study in patients with acute myocardial infarction [12].
Protection by cyclosporine A at reperfusion was now tested in pigs. Enflurane-anesthetized Göttinger minipigs (20–40 kg body weight) of either sex were subjected to 90 min controlled hypoperfusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery and 120 min reperfusion [7]. In four pigs cyclosporine A (5 mg/kg i.v.) was infused 5 min before reperfusion; in four pigs, ischemic postconditioning was induced with six cycles of 20 s re-occlusion/reperfusion each; four pigs with immediate full reperfusion served as controls. Systemic hemodynamics (Table 1) and subendocardial blood flow during ischemia (microspheres) were matched between groups (Fig. 1). Both, cyclosporine A at reperfusion and ischemic postconditioning reduced infarct size (TTC staining) to a similar extent compared to controls (Fig. 1).
Table 1.
HR [1/min] | LVPmax [mmHg] | dPdtmax [mmHg/s] | CAPmean [mmHg] | CBFmean [ml/min] | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cyclosporine A | Baseline | 99 ± 7 | 94 ± 7 | 1330 ± 68 | 112 ± 5 | 22.5 ± 2.8 |
Isch5 | 100 ± 6 | 79 ± 3 | 959 ± 55 | 20 ± 3* | 1.9 ± 0.1* | |
Isch85 | 97 ± 5 | 77 ± 6* | 925 ± 45 | 20 ± 2* | 1.9 ± 0.1* | |
Rep10 | 91 ± 4 | 68 ± 7* | 796 ± 108 | 102 ± 4 | 66.1 ± 8.9* | |
Rep30 | 108 ± 7 | 72 ± 8* | 1060 ± 203 | 105 ± 1 | 61.4 ± 10.9* | |
Rep60 | 115 ± 7 | 70 ± 6* | 946 ± 117 | 105 ± 3 | 54.8 ± 7.2* | |
Rep120 | 119 ± 10 | 65 ± 7* | 946 ± 111 | 103 ± 5 | 54.1 ± 7.7* | |
Postconditioning | Baseline | 100 ± 9 | 96 ± 3 | 1446 ± 36 | 122 ± 6 | 24.6 ± 3.1 |
Isch5 | 112 ± 11 | 77 ± 7* | 997 ± 59 | 22 ± 2* | 2.9 ± 0.6* | |
Isch85 | 105 ± 9 | 77 ± 3* | 1112 ± 46 | 24 ± 2* | 2.9 ± 0.6* | |
Rep10 | 109 ± 8 | 76 ± 5* | 1383 ± 103 | 109 ± 6 | 74.2 ± 9.3* | |
Rep30 | 113 ± 8 | 76 ± 3* | 1377 ± 79 | 111 ± 4 | 66.1 ± 8.0* | |
Rep60 | 113 ± 11 | 69 ± 12* | 1380 ± 416 | 122 ± 4# | 65.8 ± 10.9* | |
Rep120 | 125 ± 12 | 69 ± 5* | 1364 ± 259 | 115 ± 7 | 59.1 ± 14.7* | |
Immediate full reperfusion | Baseline | 93 ± 6 | 103 ± 2 | 1294 ± 52 | 122 ± 5 | 24.3 ± 2.6 |
Isch5 | 98 ± 10 | 82 ± 2* | 1039 ± 87 | 23 ± 2* | 2.8 ± 0.4* | |
Isch85 | 94 ± 7 | 85 ± 4* | 1178 ± 45 | 23 ± 1* | 2.8 ± 0.4* | |
Rep10 | 95 ± 7 | 76 ± 5* | 1101 ± 173 | 111 ± 7 | 57.6 ± 9.0* | |
Rep30 | 103 ± 12 | 72 ± 6* | 1278 ± 183 | 106 ± 4* | 53.5 ± 7.9* | |
Rep60 | 118 ± 16 | 73 ± 2* | 1432 ± 111 | 110 ± 1 | 55.1 ± 9.4* | |
Rep120 | 116 ± 15 | 61 ± 3* | 1222 ± 174 | 118 ± 9# | 67.1 ± 16.8* |
Isch5/85: 5/85 min ischemia; Rep10/30/60/120: 10/30/60/120 min reperfusion; HR: heart rate; LVPmax: maximal left ventricular pressure; dPdtmax: maximum in the first derivative of LVP; CAPmean: mean coronary arterial pressure; CBFmean: mean coronary blood flow; means ± SEM; *p < 0.05 vs. Baseline; # p < 0.05 vs. Cyclosporine A; two-way-ANOVA with Fisher’s LSD post-hoc tests.
Whereas pigs differ from rodents with respect to the causal role of RISK in ischemic postconditioning, they share with both rodents and importantly also humans protection by cyclosporine A at reperfusion, suggesting an important role for mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening across all species.
Acknowledgments
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Footnotes
Supported by the German Research Foundation (He 1320/18-1).
References
- 1.Heusch G. Postconditioning. Old wine in a new bottle? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1111–2. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Skyschally A, van Caster P, Iliodromitis EK, Schulz R, Kremastinos DT, Heusch G. Ischemic postconditioning—experimental models and protocol algorithms. Basic Res Cardiol. 2009;104:469–83. doi: 10.1007/s00395-009-0040-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Staat P, Rioufol G, Piot C, Cottin Y, Cung TT, L’Huillier I, et al. Postconditioning the human heart. Circulation. 2005;112:2143–8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.558122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ferdinandy P, Schulz R, Baxter GF. Interaction of cardiovascular risk factors with myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury, preconditioning, and postconditioning. Pharmacol Rev. 2007;59:418–58. doi: 10.1124/pr.107.06002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Heusch G, Boengler K, Schulz R. Cardioprotection: nitric oxide, protein kinases, and mitochondria. Circulation. 2008;118:1915–9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.805242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hausenloy DJ, Yellon DM. Reperfusion injury salvage kinase signalling: taking a RISK for cardioprotection. Heart Fail Rev. 2007;12:217–34. doi: 10.1007/s10741-007-9026-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Skyschally A, van Caster P, Boengler K, Gres P, Musiolik J, Schilawa D, et al. Ischemic postconditioning in pigs: no causal role for RISK activation. Circ Res. 2009;104:15–8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.186429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Argaud L, Gateau-Roesch O, Raisky O, Loufouat J, Robert D, Ovize M. Postconditioning inhibits mitochondrial permeability transition. Circulation. 2005;111:194–7. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000151290.04952.3B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lim SY, Davidson SM, Hausenloy DJ, Yellon DM. Preconditioning and postconditioning: the essential role of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore. Cardiovasc Res. 2007;75:530–5. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2007.04.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Heusch G, Boengler K, Schulz R. Inhibition of mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening: the holy grail of cardioprotection. Basic Res Cardiol. 2010;105:151–4. doi: 10.1007/s00395-009-0080-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Argaud L, Gateau-Roesch O, Muntean D, Chalabreysse L, Loufouat J, Robert D, et al. Specific inhibition of the mitochondrial permeability transition prevents lethal reperfusion injury. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2005;38:367–74. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2004.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Piot C, Croisille P, Staat P, Thibault H, Rioufol G, Mewton N, et al. Effect of cyclosporine on reperfusion injury in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:473–81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa071142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]