Abstract
Hamster parvovirus (HaPV) was isolated 2 decades ago from hamsters with clinical signs similar to those induced in hamsters experimentally infected with other rodent parvoviruses. Genetically, HaPV is most closely related to mouse parvovirus (MPV), which induces subclinical infection in mice. A novel MPV strain, MPV3, was detected recently in naturally infected mice, and genomic sequence analysis indicates that MPV3 is almost identical to HaPV. The goal of the present studies was to examine the infectivity of HaPV in mice. Neonatal and weanling mice of several mouse strains were inoculated with HaPV. Tissues, excretions, and sera were harvested at 1, 2, 4, and 8 wk after inoculation and evaluated by quantitative PCR and serologic assays specific for HaPV. Quantitative PCR detected viral DNA quantities that greatly exceeded the quantity of virus in inocula in multiple tissues of infected mice. Seroconversion to both nonstructural and structural viral proteins was detected in most immunocompetent mice 2 or more weeks after inoculation with HaPV. In neonatal SCID mice, viral transcripts were detected in lymphoid tissues by RT-PCR and viral DNA was detected in feces by quantitative PCR at 8 wk after inoculation. No clinical signs, gross, or histologic lesions were observed. These findings are similar to those observed in mice infected with MPV. These data support the hypothesis that HaPV and MPV3 are likely variants of the same viral species, for which the mouse is the natural rodent host with rare interspecies transmission to the hamster.
Abbreviations: HaPV, hamster parvovirus; mfi, median fluorescent intensity; MFI, multiplex fluorescent immunoassay; MPV, mouse parvovirus; MVM, minute virus of mice; NS1, nonstructural protein 1; qPCR, quantitative PCR; VP2, viral capsid protein 2
Murine parvoviruses are among the most prevalent infectious agents detected in contemporary laboratory mouse colonies.27,35 Various disease syndromes in mice have been associated with minute virus of mice (MVM) infection,10,24,25,39-41 whereas mouse parvovirus (MPV) infection has not been associated with clinical disease or pathologic lesions to date. Initial MPV infection occurs in the intestinal tract, followed by persistence in lymphoid tissues.3,19 Neonatal SCID mice inoculated with MPV or MVM develop chronic productive infection with persistent fecal shedding of virus.3,40 Both minute virus of mice and MPV can have deleterious effects on research due to in vitro and in vivo immunomodulatory effects,9,13,24,28–31 tumor suppression,17,18,24,28,30 and contamination of cell cultures and tissues originating from mice.9,11,12,15,16,28,32
Hamster parvovirus (HaPV) initially was isolated 2 decades ago from a large commercial colony of Syrian hamsters that experienced morbidity and mortality approaching 100% among suckling and weanling hamsters.4 Affected hamsters exhibit domed craniums, a potbellied appearance, abnormally small testicles, and discolored, malformed, or missing incisors. Neonatal hamsters inoculated with a low dose of HaPV survive to at least 6 wk of age and display incisor and testicular lesions identical to those observed during the initial HaPV epizootic. Neonatal hamsters inoculated with a high dose of HaPV uniformly succumb to a lethal hemorrhagic disease affecting the kidneys, gastrointestinal tract, testicle or uterus, and brain, generally by 7 to 8 d after inoculation. Histologic lesions of thrombosis in blood vessels and basophilic intranuclear inclusion bodies in endothelial cells suggest the pathogenesis for the hemorrhagic disease is thrombogenesis due to viral infection of endothelial cells with subsequent ischemic necrosis.
Although HaPV was isolated initially from Syrian hamsters, whether this species is the natural rodent host for this virus is questionable. Clinical disease is observed in fetal or neonatal Syrian hamsters experimentally infected with the rodent parvoviruses minute virus of mice, H1, and Kilham rat virus, which typically cause subclinical infection in their natural mouse and rat hosts.14,20–23,44 The clinical signs (tooth loss or discoloration, facial bone deformities, diarrhea, stunted growth, ataxia, and death) and gross and histologic lesions observed in these experimental infections are similar to those exhibited by HaPV-infected hamsters. These findings suggest the hamster is likely an aberrant host for HaPV, and another subclinically affected species may serve as a reservoir of HaPV. The lack of similar disease outbreaks or parvovirus isolations in Syrian hamsters supports the concept that this species is an aberrant host for HaPV.
During a molecular epidemiologic investigation of mice naturally infected with parvoviruses, our laboratory identified 3 genetically distinct variants of MPV.7 MPV1 was detected most frequently (78% of samples evaluated), whereas 2 novel MPV genotypes, designated 2 and 3, were detected in 21% and 1% of the samples evaluated, respectively. Genetically, MPV3 is almost identical to HaPV with 98.1% nucleotide sequence homology. Likewise, the amino acid sequences for the predicted viral proteins are highly conserved, with conservation of a 3-codon insertion in the VP1 amino terminus that is absent in other rodent parvoviruses. Unfortunately, the mouse colony in which MPV3 was detected was depopulated before virus isolation could be attempted to enable further characterization of this novel variant. However, the genetic similarity between HaPV and MPV3 suggests that HaPV might be useful as a surrogate isolate to evaluate the pathogenesis of MPV3 in mice. In addition, the infectivity of HaPV in mice needs to be assessed to determine the potential for interspecies transmission between mice and hamsters. The objective of the current studies was to evaluate the infectivity of HaPV in potentially susceptible strains and ages of mice.
Materials and Methods
Virus propagation.
HaPV was obtained from an intramural stock and propagated in baby hamster kidney (BHK21) cells as described previously.5 Cell lysates were prepared and the 50% tissue culture infectious dose was determined. In addition, HaPV was propagated by inoculation of newborn hamsters to obtain viral stocks with higher titers than those obtained by cell culture propagation. Untimed pregnant female Golden Syrian hamsters were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA). Hamsters were specified to be free of pathogenic bacteria, endo- and ectoparasites, and antibodies to Sendai virus, pneumonia virus of mice, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus, and reovirus by the supplier. Each pregnant hamster was housed individually in microisolation caging during gestation and lactation. At 3 d of age, hamster pups were inoculated orally with cell-culture–propagated HaPV. Hamsters were euthanized 10-d after inoculation by carbon dioxide inhalation, and the spleen, kidneys, and liver of each animal were collected aseptically and stored frozen at –80 °C. Tissues then were homogenized at a 1:5 dilution (v/v) in Tris–EDTA buffer (pH 8.7), frozen and thawed 3 times, twice subjected to centrifugation (1,000 × g for 5 min) to remove cellular debris, and the resulting supernatant was passed through a 0.45-µm then a 0.2-µm filter. Ten-fold serial dilutions of this filtrate were administered by gavage to 6-wk-old Swiss Webster mice (n = 3 mice per dilution group), and the 50% infectious dose was determined based on seroconversion to MPV rVP2, HaPV rVP2, and rNS1 as measured by multiplex fluorescent immunoassay.
All manipulations of mice and hamsters were performed in a class II biological safety cabinet by using standard microisolation technique. Animals were housed in sterilized static microisolation caging on aspen chip bedding (changed weekly) in a biocontainment facility at a temperature of 22 to 24 °C, humidity of 30% to 70%, 12 to 15 air exchanges hourly, and a 14:10-h light:dark cycle. A Teklad Global 19% Protein diet (breeders) or a Teklad NIH31 diet (weanlings; Harlan Teklad, Madison, WI) and hyperchlorinated water were provided ad libitum. The University of Arizona Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved all animal procedures.
Mouse infection.
Breeding age male and female C3H/HeNUac (C3H) and C.B-17/IcrAcc-scid (SCID) mice were obtained from intramural breeding colonies and bred to produce the neonatal and weanling mice of these strains needed for experimental infection studies. Breeding-age male and female BALB/cAnNHsd (BALB/c) mice were obtained from Harlan (Indianapolis, IN), and 8-wk-old male and female NTac:NihBlackSwiss (BSW) mice were obtained from Taconic (Hudson, NY). Mouse strains were selected on the basis of their relative susceptibility to MPV1 infection.3,8 All mice were specified to be free of murine viruses (mouse hepatitis virus, minute virus of mice, mouse parvovirus, mouse rotavirus, encephalomyelitis virus, pneumonia virus of mice, Sendai virus, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus, murine norovirus, ectromelia virus, Hantaan virus, mouse adenovirus, mouse cytomegalovirus, respiratory enteric orphan virus 3, K virus, lactic dehydrogenase elevating virus, polyoma virus, and mouse thymic virus), pathogenic bacteria, and endo- and ectoparasites by intramural and vendor-supplied health surveillance reports. Each control or experimental group was housed separately in microisolation caging.
Multiple strains of mice (C3H, BALB/c, BSW, SCID) were inoculated with HaPV as neonates (3 d of age or younger) or weanlings (3 to 4 wk of age). Experiments were performed at different times over the course of several years, with different routes of inoculation (oronasal or gavage) and doses of virus inoculum (log10 TCID50 3.7 to 5.0 or log10 ID50 4.0). Mock-infected mice (Tris–EDTA buffer [pH 8.7]) were included for studies of SCID and BSW mice. Clinical observation of both HaPV- and mock-infected mice was performed daily throughout the course of the study. Mice were euthanized at 1, 2, 4, or 8 wk after inoculation by carbon dioxide inhalation. Blood was collected by cardiocentesis from each mouse. Serum was diluted 1:5 (v/v) in PBS and stored at –80 °C until evaluated by multiplex fluorescent immunoassay (MFI). Samples of spleen, mesenteric lymph node, and thymus were taken immediately after euthanasia and placed in RNAlater (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Various tissues and bodily excretions were collected from each mouse as follows: mesenteric lymph node, spleen, jejunum (all mouse strains); peripheral lymph node, thymus, heart, lung, salivary gland, colon, liver, pancreas, kidney, gonad, bone marrow (BALB/c, BSW, and SCID strains only); brain, feces, urine, and nasopharyngeal lavage fluid (BALB/c, SCID strains only; feces collected only at 4 and 8 wk after inoculation from neonates). Representative samples of each tissue were fixed in 4% paraformaledehyde for histopathology or stored frozen at –80 °C for DNA extraction. Routine histotechnology was performed on fixed tissues with paraffin-embedding, 5-μM sections, and hematoxylin and eosin staining (SCID, BALB/c mice only). DNA was extracted from fresh frozen specimens (approximately 20 mg tissue or 50 to 200 µL fluid) by using a MagneSil KF Genomic DNA extraction kit (Promega, Madison, WI) and a KingFisher robotic extraction station (Thermo Scientific, Franklin, MA) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Extracted DNA was stored at –20 °C until evaluated by quantitative PCR (qPCR).
qPCR.
Extracted DNA was screened by an MPV- and HaPV-specific qPCR assay as previously described.7,37 Reactions were performed on an Mx3000P qPCR System (Stratagene, Cedar Creek, TX) and products were analyzed by using the accompanying software. Each 20 µL reaction consisted of 1× TaqMan buffer (50 mM KCl, 10 µM EDTA, 10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.3] and 60 nM Passive Reference); 5.5 mM MgCl2; 200 μM (each) dATP, dCTP, dGTP; 400 μM dUTP; 300 nM primers; 125 nM probe; 0.2 U AmpErase uracil-N-glycosylase; 0.5 U AmpliTaq Gold Polymerase (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA); and 2 µL template DNA. Thermal cycling conditions consisted of 50 °C for 2 min for uracil-N-glycosylase incubation, 95 °C for 10 min for polymerase activation, and then 45 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s followed by 60 °C for 1 min. Samples were considered positive if they exhibited a cycle threshold of less than 35.
Serology.
The multiplex fluorescent immunoassay (MFI) format was used to evaluate sera for the presence of virus-specific antibodies. Baculovirus-expressed recombinant nonstructural protein 1 (rNS1) from MVM prototype strain, recombinant MPV1b viral capsid protein 2 (MPV rVP2), and recombinant HaPV viral capsid protein 2 (HaPV rVP2) were prepared essentially as previously described.26,38 Purified rNS1 and rVP2 antigens were covalently coupled to carboxylated polystyrene microspheres (Luminex, Austin, TX) at a coupling concentration of 25 µg protein per 5 × 106 microspheres according to the manufacturer's recommended protocols. Ovalbumin, A92L mouse fibroblast cell lysate, and Hi-Five (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) insect cell lysate were similarly coated to microspheres to serve as control antigens, with cell lysates prepared by 3 freeze-thaw cycles. Microspheres were stored at 4 °C in the dark until use. Evaluation of mouse sera for rNS1- and rVP2-specific antibodies was performed automatically (LiquiChip Workstation, Qiagen) as described previously.3 Briefly, antigen-coated microspheres were incubated for 60 min with dilute sera at a final dilution of 1:500 in 100 µL diluent, washed twice, incubated with phycoerythrin-conjugated F(ab′)2 fragment goat antimouse IgG (heavy + light chain) secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA), washed twice, and resuspended in stop solution containing formalin. The microplate then was shaken for 5 min and analyzed. Baseline values of 275 (MPV rVP2, HaPV rVP2) and 125 (rNS1) were used to discriminate negative and positive samples. Baselines were determined previously as the mean plus 5 SD of results obtained for 50 serum samples from mice known to be negative for murine parvovirus infection. Results are reported as the median fluorescent intensity (mfi) of 50 antigen-coated microspheres.
RT-PCR.
RNA was extracted from tissues stored in RNAlater by using an RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). Primer sequences were kindly provided by Dr Ken Henderson (Charles River Laboratories) for detection of viral RNA encoding VP1 and VP2, as previously described.3 All RT-PCR reactions were performed with GeneAmp 2400 PCR System (PE Applied Biosystems). The reverse transcription step consisted of 1× TaqMan buffer (50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.3]); 5.5 mM MgCl2; 500 µM dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP; 8 U RNase inhibitor; 25 U of murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Applied Biosystems); 2.5 µM random hexamers; and 2 μL of template RNA in a 20 µL reaction. Thermal cycling conditions consisted of 25 °C for 10 min for hexameric primer extension, reverse transcription at 48 °C for 30 min, and 95 °C for 5 min for reverse transcriptase inactivation. The PCR reaction consisted of 1× TaqMan buffer (50 mM KCl, 10 μM EDTA, 10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.3] and 60 nM passive reference); 5.5 mM MgCl2; 200 µM dATP, dCTP, dGTP; 400 µM dUTP; 0.5 U of AmpliTaq Gold; 0.2 U of uracil N-glycosylase; 150 nM forward and 300 nM reverse primers; and 2 µL cDNA in a 20-µL reaction. Thermal cycling conditions consisted of 50 °C for 2 min for uracil N-glycosylase incubation, denaturation, and Taq polymerase activation at 95 °C for 10 min, and 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, 57 °C for 15 s, and 72 °C for 25 s. DNA amplicons were electrophoresed on a 3% NuSieve agarose gel, and banding patterns were used to determine the presence of viral RNA in a given tissue.
Results
HaPV infection in immunocompetent neonatal mice.
Neonatal mice of 3 immunocompetent strains (C3H, BALB/c, BSW) were inoculated with HaPV. Serum samples collected at 1, 2, 4, and 8 wk after inoculation were monitored for antibody response to rNS1, MPV rVP2, and HaPV rVP2 by MFI (Table 1). Seroconversion to NS1 was observed in mice representing all 3 mouse strains at 2 wk after inoculation and later, although seroconversion to this antigen was inconsistent. Seroconversion to MPV and HaPV rVP2 antigens were detected in almost all BSW and C3H mice at the 4- and 8-wk time points, whereas seroconversion to these antigens was less consistent in BALB/c mice. Although the MPV and HaPV rVP2 antigens were prepared identically and coated onto microspheres at the same concentration for use in the MFI, mean antibody levels detected by HaPV rVP2 antigen were higher than those detected by MPV rVP2 antigen. Mock-infected BSW mice did not seroconvert to rNS1, MPV, or HaPV VP2 antigens (data not shown).
Table 1.
Serologic and qPCR results for neonatal immunocompetent mice inoculated oronasally with HaPV
| MFI (mean mfi for all seropositive mice) |
MPV PCR (mean log10 viral copies/ 20 mg tissue) |
|||||||
| Strain | Viral dosea | Time after inoculation (wk) | rNS1 | MPV | HaPV | Lymph node, spleen, thymus | Intestine | Otherb |
| C3H | 4.0 | 1 | 0/2c | 0/2 | not done | 2/2 (5.4) | 2/2 (6.6) | not done |
| C3H | 4.0 | 2 | 0/2 | 2/2 (1424) | not done | 2/2 (4.8) | 2/2 (4.0) | not done |
| C3H | 4.7 | 4 | 3/4 (300) | 4/4 (5246) | 4/4 (11956) | 4/4 (4.5) | 2/4 (4.1) | not done |
| C3H | 4.7 | 8 | 1/5 (584) | 5/5 (15046) | 5/5 (13597) | 3/5 (5.8) | 0/5 | not done |
| BALB/c | 3.7 | 1 | 0/4 | 0/4 | 0/4 | 2/4 (5.4) | 4/4 (4.7) | 1/4 (4.3) |
| BALB/c | 3.7 | 2 | 1/3 (135) | 0/3 | 1/3 (1141) | 2/4 (5.4) | 1/4 (4.7) | 1/4 (4.4) |
| BALB/c | 3.7 | 4 | 3/4 (729) | 2/4 (1732) | 3/4 (4286) | 1/4 (6.6) | 0/4 | 1/4 (6.7) |
| BALB/c | 3.7 | 8 | 2/4 (754) | 2/4 (886) | 2/4 (6436) | 2/4 (4.4) | 0/4 | 0/4 |
| BSW | 4.0 ID50 | 1 | 0/8 | 0/8 | 0/8 | 4/4 (5.3) | 2/4 (3.9) | 1/4 (5.9) |
| BSW | 4.0 ID50 | 4 | 2/4 (141) | 4/4 (1744) | 4/4 (9838) | 1/4 (4.3) | 0/4 | 0/4 |
| BSW | 4.0 ID50 | 8 | 2/4 (396) | 3/4 (4919) | 4/4 (8329) | 2/4 (4.6) | 0/4 | 0/4 |
For C3H and BALB/c mice, viral dose is expressed as 50% tissue culture infective dose (log10); for BSW, viral dose is expressed as the 50% infective dose of HaPV inoculum propagated in vivo.
Other = bone marrow, brain, pancreas, liver, kidney, gonad, salivary gland, heart, lung
no. positive animals/total no. animals tested
In addition, tissue DNA extracts from infected neonatal mice were evaluated by qPCR (Table 1). Results from individual tissues obtained from each mouse were compiled into 3 tissue groups (lymphoid, intestinal, and other) for interpretation. Viral DNA was detected most consistently in lymphoid tissues in all 3 mouse strains. Viral DNA was detected in intestinal tissues in several mice from 1 to 4 wk after inoculation but in none of the mice at 8 wk after inoculation. Viral DNA was detected in tissues other than lymphoid and intestinal tissues, with sporadic detection in salivary gland, pancreas, and lung. Viral DNA was not detected in feces of mice inoculated as neonates at 4 and 8 wk after inoculation. Viral DNA was not detected in samples from any mock-infected neonatal BSW mice (data not shown).
Histology was performed on all BALB/c mice inoculated as neonates. No lesions were observed in lymph node (mesenteric, submandibular), spleen, thymus, heart, lung, salivary gland, jejunum, colon, liver, pancreas, kidney, gonad, or bone marrow.
HaPV infection in immunocompetent weanling mice.
Weanling immunocompetent mice (C3H, BALB/c, BSW) were inoculated with HaPV (Table 2). Sera collected from mice were evaluated by MFI serology at 1, 2, 4, and 8 wk after inoculation. Seroconversion to NS1 was observed in mice representing all 3 mouse strains at 2 wk after inoculation or later, although seroconversion to this antigen was inconsistent. Seroconversion to MPV and HaPV rVP2 antigens were detected in most mice at 2 wk inoculation or later, with generally higher antibody responses observed to HaPV rVP2 antigen as compared with MPV rVP2 antigen. Mock-infected BSW mice did not seroconvert to rNS1, MPV, or HaPV VP2 antigens (data not shown).
Table 2.
Serologic and qPCR results for weanling immunocompetent mice inoculated oronasally with HaPV
| MFI (mean mfi for all seropositive mice) |
MPV PCR (mean log10 viral copies/20 mg tissue) |
|||||||
| Strain | Viral dosea | Time after inoculation (wk) | rNS1 | MPV | HaPV | Lymph node, spleen, thymus | Intestine | Otherb |
| C3H | 4.5 | 1 | 0/2e | 1/2 (322) | 2/2 (820) | 1/2 (5.5) | 0/2 | not done |
| C3H | 4.5 | 2 | 1/2 (194) | 1/2 (8121) | 2/2 (2988) | 1/2 (3.9) | 0/2 | not done |
| C3H | 5.0 | 4 | 1/4 (162) | 4/4 (3678) | not done | 0/4 | 0/4 | not done |
| C3H | 5.0 | 8 | 2/4 (172) | 4/4 (10524) | not done | 0/4 | 0/4 | not done |
| BALB/c | 4.0 | 1 | 0/4 | 0/4 | 0/4 | 0/4 | 0/4 | 1/4 (3.8) |
| BALB/c | 4.0 | 2 | 3/4 (484) | 3/4 (639) | 3/4 (3324) | 3/4 (5.5) | 2/4 (4.0) | 3/4 (4.3) |
| BALB/c | 4.0 | 4 | 4/4 (1092) | 4/4 (5615) | 4/4 (9831) | 4/4 (6.4) | 3/4 (4.9) | 4/4 (4.3) |
| BALB/c | 4.0 | 8 | 3/4 (449) | 3/4 (3834) | 3/4 (10948) | 3/4 (5.3) | 0/4 | 3/4 (5.0) |
| BSWd | 4.0 ID50 | 1 | 1/4 (153) | 0/4 | 0/4 | 0/4 | 0/4 | 0/4 |
| BSWd | 4.0 ID50 | 4 | 1/4 (255) | 2/4 (6080) | 2/4 (11964) | 1/4 (4.3) | 0/4 | 0/4 |
For C3H and BALB/c mice, viral dose is expressed as 50% tissue culture infective dose (log10); for BSW, viral dose is expressed as the 50% infective dose of HaPV inoculum propagated in vivo.
Other = bone marrow, brain, pancreas, liver, kidney, gonad, salivary gland, heart, lung
cno. positive animals/total no. animals tested
Inoculated by gastric gavage
We used qPCR evaluation to detect HaPV DNA in individual tissue DNA extracts from weanling C3H, BALB/c, and BSW strains (Table 2). Again, results were grouped into lymphoid, intestinal, and other tissue types. Viral DNA was detected only in lymphoid tissues of C3H and BSW mice at 1, 2, or 4 wk after inoculation. HaPV DNA was detected in lymphoid, intestinal, and several other tissues (salivary gland, pancreas, lung, liver, heart, and kidney) of BALB/c mice at multiple time points after inoculation, with the highest levels of viral DNA detected in lymphoid tissues. Fecal virus was detected by qPCR in BALB/c mice at 2 and 4 wk after inoculation but not at 8 wk after inoculation. Viral DNA was not detected in samples from mock-infected weanling BSW mice (data not shown).
HaPV infection in SCID mice.
Neonatal and weanling SCID mice were inoculated oronasally with varied doses of HaPV. Individual tissues were surveyed for viral DNA by qPCR and grouped (lymphoid, intestinal, or other tissues) for analysis (Table 3). HaPV DNA was detected in multiple tissues in most neonatal SCID mice at multiple time points after inoculation. Consistently high levels of HaPV that greatly exceeded those present in the inoculum were detected in neonatal SCID mice at all time points, with the highest levels detected in the lymphoid tissues. In addition to lymphoid and intestinal tissues, HaPV DNA was sporadically detected in brain, salivary gland, lung, pancreas, gonad, heart, liver, bone marrow, and kidney, and fecal virus was detected by qPCR consistently at 4 and 8 wk after inoculation. In weanling SCID inoculates, low levels of viral DNA were detected in tissues, predominantly during the first 2 wk after inoculation. Viral DNA was not detected in samples from mock-infected SCID mice (data not shown).
Table 3.
qPCR results for neonate and weanling SCID mice inoculated oronasally with HaPV
| MPV PCR (mean log10 viral copies/20 mg tissue) |
|||||
| Viral dosea (log10 TCID50) | Time after inoculation (wk) | Lymph node, spleen, thymus | Intestine | Otherb | |
| Neonates | 3.7 | 1 | 1/4c (4.9) | 3/4 (4.1) | 3/4 (5.4) |
| 3.7 | 2 | 2/4 (6.6) | 1/4 (5.5) | 2/4 (4.6) | |
| 3.7 | 4 | 3/4 (6.6) | 2/4 (6.0) | 2/4 (5.1) | |
| 3.7 | 8 | 2/4 (7.0) | 2/4 (6.1) | 4/4 (5.8) | |
| 4.0 ID50 | 4 | 4/4 (5.8) | 3/4 (4.9) | 4/4 (4.9) | |
| 4.0 ID50 | 8 | 2/2 (6.4) | 2/2 (4.8) | 2/2 (4.8) | |
| Weanlings | 4.0 | 1 | 2/4 (4.0) | 0/4 | 1/4 (4.0) |
| 4.0 | 2 | 2/4 (5.7) | 0/4 | 3/4 (4.0) | |
| 4.0 | 4 | 0/4 | 0/4 | 0/4 | |
| 4.0 | 8 | 1/4 (4.6) | 1/4 (4.4) | 3/4 (4.7) | |
For SCID mice, viral dose is expressed as 50% tissue culture infective dose (log10); ID50 indicates viral dose is expressed as the 50% infective dose of HaPV inoculum propagated in vivo.
Other = bone marrow, brain, pancreas, liver, kidney, gonad, salivary gland, heart, lung
no. positive animals/total no. animals tested
Tissues from several SCID mice inoculated as neonates were collected at the 8-wk time point and preserved in RNA later. RNA from these samples was evaluated by RT-PCR for the presence of viral transcripts. Bands corresponding in size to that expected for unspliced and spliced HaPV transcripts were detected in HaPV-inoculated mice but not in mock-inoculated mice (Figure 1). Differential splicing at the small splice donor and acceptor sites was visualized by the presence of the 2 smaller bands (290 and 276 bp) on the gel in addition to a band corresponding in size to unspliced RNA (372 bp).
Figure 1.
RT-PCR detection of HaPV transcripts in mouse tissues collected from 2 HaPV-infected SCID mice (lanes 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 12). Results also shown for comparison tissues collected from 2 mock-infected mice (lanes 1, 2, 5, 6, 9, 10). Tissues include mesenteric lymph node (lanes 1 through 4), thymus (lanes 5 through 8), and spleen (lanes 9 through 12). Amplicons represent spliced (RNAsp) and unspliced (RNAun) viral transcripts. Mk, marker; DNA, DNA isolated from HaPV-infected cell culture; RNA, RNA isolated from HaPV-infected cell culture.
Histology was performed on all neonatal and weanling SCID mice. No lesions were observed in lymph nodes (mesenteric, submandibular), spleen, thymus, heart, lung, salivary gland, jejunum, colon, liver, pancreas, kidney, gonad, or bone marrow.
Discussion
The rodent parvoviruses minute virus of mice, H1, and Kilham rat virus are generally subclinical in their natural mouse and rat hosts, yet they all induce clinical disease when inoculated into fetal or neonatal Syrian hamsters.14,20–23,44 LuIII, a parvovirus of unknown host origin most closely related genetically to MPV and HaPV, similarly induces clinical disease when inoculated into neonatal hamsters.43 The clinical signs, gross and histologic lesions associated with experimental infection of hamsters by these parvoviruses are similar to those observed in HaPV-infected hamsters. This result suggests that the Syrian hamster may be an aberrant host for HaPV and that another rodent species may serve as the reservoir. Genomic sequence analysis of HaPV and MPV3, a variant of MPV recently detected in naturally infected mice, revealed these 2 viruses exhibit extremely high genetic homology and share a unique 3 codon insertion in the VP1 capsid protein that is not present in MPV1, MPV2, or other rodent parvoviruses.7 This finding suggests HaPV and MPV3 are variants of a single viral genotype and that transmission of MPV3 from mice to hamsters may have induced the clinical manifestations in hamsters that ultimately led to the isolation of HaPV.
The present studies evaluated the infectivity of HaPV in potentially susceptible strains and ages of mice to determine whether HaPV could serve as a surrogate isolate for MPV3, which has not yet been isolated from infected mice. Initially HaPV was propagated in vitro in cell culture, with some inconsistency observed in the results obtained for C3H, BALB/c, and SCID mice inoculated with this stock (Tables 1 through 3). In addition, HaPV was cultivated in vivo in neonatal hamsters to obtain high-titer viral stock, to determine whether more-concentrated viral inocula would induce infection more consistently. Again we obtained somewhat inconsistent results in BSW and SCID mice; therefore, data from all experimental infections of mice were used in the final analysis.
Multiplex serology and qPCR assays specific for MPV and HaPV were used to evaluate antibody induction and tissue viral DNA loads, and histology was performed in select mice to identify microscopic lesions. Seroconversion to MPV1 and HaPV viral capsid protein was consistently observed at 4 and 8 wk after inoculation in immunocompetent mice inoculated as neonates and weanlings, with many mice seropositive at 1 and 2 wk after inoculation. Even though purified MPV1 and HaPV rVP2 antigen were coated onto microspheres at identical concentrations, and antibody response was detected in a multiplex format, MFI signal strength often was greater for HaPV rVP2 antigen as compared with MPV1 rVP2 antigen. This differential seroreactivity suggests that further investigation is needed to determine whether serologic detection of uncommon MPV variants like MPV2 and MPV3 could be improved through the use of additional rVP2 antigens. Antibody response to rNS1 was less consistent than that to rVP2 but present in many mice from 2 to 8 wk after inoculation, particularly in BALB/c mice, and signal strength in seropositive mice approached the antibody levels observed in mice infected with MPV1.3,6 Importantly, NS1 protein is not present in infectious parvovirus virions, so antibody response to this viral protein implies viral entry and transcription, thereby indicating productive infection of mice by HaPV.
As for the antibody response, detection of HaPV DNA by qPCR in immunocompetent mice was also inconsistent, although some trends were observed. Viral DNA was detected in intestinal tissue primarily during the early stages of infection, with detection in lymphoid tissues at all time points. In addition, viral DNA was more likely to be detected in mice inoculated as neonates as compared with weanlings and was more likely to be detected in C3H and BALB/c mice as compared with BSW. These findings are similar to previous reports on MPV1 pathogenesis which indicate acute infection of intestinal tissues with persistence of viral DNA in lymphoid tissues19,42 and mouse age- and strain-related susceptibilities.8,36 Notably, the viral DNA levels detected in many tissues were higher than were present in inocula, indicating viral genome replication consistent with productive infection. High levels of viral DNA in tissues and feces of SCID mice inoculated as neonates were detected throughout the course of infection, suggesting persistent productive infection similar to the pathogenesis of MPV1 in neonatal SCID mice.3 Spliced and unspliced viral transcripts were detected in neonatal SCID mouse inoculates by RT-PCR at 8 wk after inoculation, providing additional evidence of persistent productive infection. Histology was performed on tissues from SCID and BALB/c mice inoculated as neonates, because these age and strain groups displayed the most consistently positive results and are considered to be the most susceptible to MPV1 infection. Similar to findings for MPV1 infection in mice, no gross or histologic lesions were detected in any of the tissues examined.
The above findings indicate HaPV can induce productive infection in mice, with a pathogenesis similar to that observed in mice infected with MPV1. Multiple attempts to consistently induce productive infection were made by administration of higher viral doses, administration by gavage (weanling BSW only), and use of several mouse strains and ages. Technical limitations related to the inability to generate high-titer viral stock or oronasal inoculation of neonatal mice with a consistent amount of virus may have played a role in these inconsistencies. Alternatively, virus adaptation first to the hamster host and then to cell culture may have altered the ability of HaPV to consistently induce productive infection in mice. It is well known that relatively few amino acid changes in the parvovirus capsid protein can significantly alter the in vitro cell or in vivo host range of a parvovirus.1,2,33 The evolution of canine parvovirus from feline parvovirus34 provides a paradigm for the interspecies transmission from mouse to hamster hypothesized for MPV3–HaPV.
In summary, we inoculated several strains and ages of mice with HaPV and observed a pathogenesis similar to that of MPV1 infection in mice. The detection of seroconversion to MPV–HaPV nonstructural and capsid antigens, viral DNA levels that greatly exceeded that present in inocula, virus in feces 8 wk after inoculation, and both spliced and unspliced viral RNA indicate a productive HaPV infection in mice. These and previous findings support the hypothesis that HaPV originally arose after interspecies transmission of MPV3 from mice to hamsters. Although interspecies transmission of parvovirus rarely occurs, these data support the common practice of separate housing for different rodent species in laboratory animal facilities.
Acknowledgments
This work was made possible by a grant from the National Center for Research Resources (1 R01 RR 18488-01), a component of the National Institutes of Health. The authors thank Mike Becker, Alicia Meridew, Jessie Loganbill, and Marissa Steinberg for technical assistance, and Dr Ken Henderson for the RT-PCR primer sequences.
References
- 1.Ball-Goodrich LJ, Moir RD, Tattersall P. 1991. Parvoviral target cell specificity: acquisition of fibrotropism by a mutant of the lymphotropic strain of minute virus of mice involves multiple amino acid substitutions within the capsid. Virology 184:175–186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ball-Goodrich LJ, Tattersall P. 1992. Two amino acid substitutions within the capsid are coordinately required for acquisition of fibrotropism by the lymphotropic strain of minute virus of mice. J Virol 66:3415–3423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Besselsen DG, Becker MD, Henderson KS, Wagner AM, Banu LA, Shek WR. 2007. Temporal transmission studies of mouse parvovirus 1 in BALB/c and C.B-17/Icr-Prkdc(scid) mice. Comp Med 57:66–73 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Besselsen DG, Gibson SV, Besch-Williford CL, Purdy GA, Knowles RL, Wagner JE, Pintel DJ, Franklin CL, Hook RR, Jr, Riley LK. 1999. Natural and experimentally induced infection of Syrian hamsters with a newly recognized parvovirus. Lab Anim Sci 49:308–312 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Besselsen DG, Pintel DJ, Purdy GA, Besch-Williford CL, Franklin CL, Hook RR, Jr, Riley LK. 1996. Molecular characterization of newly recognized rodent parvoviruses. J Gen Virol 77:899–911 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Besselsen DG, Romero-Aleshire MJ, Munger SJ, Marcus EC, Henderson KS, Wagner AM. 2008. Embryo transfer rederivation of C.B-17/Icr-Prkdc(scid) mice experimentally infected with mouse parvovirus 1. Comp Med 58:353–359 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Besselsen DG, Romero MJ, Wagner AM, Henderson KS, Livingston RS. 2006. Identification of novel murine parvovirus strains by epidemiological analysis of naturally infected mice. J Gen Virol 87:1543–1556 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Besselsen DG, Wagner AM, Loganbill JK. 2000. Effect of mouse strain and age on detection of mouse parvovirus 1 by use of serologic testing and polymerase chain reaction analysis. Comp Med 50:498–502 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bonnard GD, Manders EK, Campbell DA, Jr, Herberman RB, Collins MJ., Jr 1976. Immunosuppressive activity of a subline of the mouse EL-4 lymphoma. Evidence for minute virus of mice causing the inhibition. J Exp Med 143:187–205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Brownstein DG, Smith AL, Jacoby RO, Johnson EA, Hansen G, Tattersall P. 1991. Pathogenesis of infection with a virulent allotropic variant of minute virus of mice and regulation by host genotype. Lab Invest 65:357–364 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Collins MJ, Jr, Parker JC. 1972. Murine virus contaminants of leukemia viruses and transplantable tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 49:1139–1143 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Crawford LV, Follett EA, Burdon MG, McGeoch DJ. 1969. The DNA of a minute virus of mice. J Gen Virol 4:37–46 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Engers HD, Louis JA, Zubler RH, Hirt B. 1981. Inhibition of T cell-mediated functions by MVM(i), a parvovirus closely related to minute virus of mice. J Immunol 127:2280–2285 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Garant PR, Baer PN, Kilham L. 1980. Electron microscopic localization of virions in developing teeth of young hamsters infected with minute virus of mice. J Dent Res 59:80–86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Garnick RL. 1996. Experience with viral contamination in cell culture. Dev Biol Stand 88:49–56 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Garnick RL. 1998. Raw materials as a source of contamination in large-scale cell culture. Dev Biol Stand 93:21–29 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Giese NA, Lang S, Raykov Z, Rommelaere J, Dinsart C, Cornelis JJ. 2000. Oncosuppressive effects of wild-type MVMp and recombinant derivates in immunocompetent mice. Infectious Disease Review 2:153–154 [Google Scholar]
- 18.Guetta E, Graziani Y, Tal J. 1986. Suppression of Ehrlich ascites tumors in mice by minute virus of mice. J Natl Cancer Inst 76:1177–1180 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jacoby RO, Johnson EA, Ball-Goodrich L, Smith AL, McKisic MD. 1995. Characterization of mouse parvovirus infection by in situ hybridization. J Virol 69:3915–3919 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kilham L. 1960. Mongolism associated with rat virus (RV) infection in hamsters. Virology 13:141–143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kilham L. 1961. Rat virus (RV) infections in hamsters. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 106:825–829 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kilham L, Margolis G. 1964. Cerebellar ataxia in hamsters inoculated with rat virus. Science 143:1047–1048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kilham L, Margolis G. 1970. Pathogenicity of minute virus of mice (MVM) for rats, mice, and hamsters. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 133:1447–1452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kimsey PB, Engers HD, Hirt B, Jongeneel CV. 1986. Pathogenicity of fibroblast- and lymphocyte-specific variants of minute virus of mice. J Virol 59:8–13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lamana ML, Albella B, Bueren JA, Segovia JC. 2001. In vitro and in vivo susceptibility of mouse megakaryocytic progenitors to strain i of parvovirus minute virus of mice. Exp Hematol 29:1303–1309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Livingston RS, Besselsen DG, Steffen EK, Besch-Williford CL, Franklin CL, Riley LK. 2002. Serodiagnosis of mice minute virus and mouse parvovirus infections in mice by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with baculovirus-expressed recombinant VP2 proteins. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 9:1025–1031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Livingston RS, Riley LK. 2003. Diagnostic testing of mouse and rat colonies for infectious agents. Lab Anim (NY) 32:44–51 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.McKisic MD, Lancki DW, Otto G, Padrid P, Snook S, Cronin DC, Lohmar PD, Wong T, Fitch FW. 1993. Identification and propagation of a putative immunosuppressive orphan parvovirus in cloned T cells. J Immunol 150:419–428 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.McKisic MD, Macy JD, Jr, Delano ML, Jacoby RO, Paturzo FX, Smith AL. 1998. Mouse parvovirus infection potentiates allogeneic skin graft rejection and induces syngeneic graft rejection. Transplantation 65:1436–1446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.McKisic MD, Paturzo FX, Smith AL. 1996. Mouse parvovirus infection potentiates rejection of tumor allografts and modulates T cell effector functions. Transplantation 61:292–299 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.McMaster GK, Beard P, Engers HD, Hirt B. 1981. Characterization of an immunosuppressive parvovirus related to the minute virus of mice. J Virol 38:317–326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Nicklas W, Kraft V, Meyer B. 1993. Contamination of transplantable tumors, cell lines, and monoclonal antibodies with rodent viruses. Lab Anim Sci 43:296–300 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Parrish CR. 1991. Mapping specific functions in the capsid structure of canine parvovirus and feline panleukopenia virus using infectious plasmid clones. Virology 183:195–205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Parrish CR. 1999. Host range relationships and the evolution of canine parvovirus. Vet Microbiol 69:29–40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Pritchett-Corning KR, Cosentino J, Clifford CB. 2009. Contemporary prevalence of infectious agents in laboratory mice and rats. Lab Anim 43:165–173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Pritchett KR, Henderson KS, Simmons JH, Shek WR. 2006. Differences in susceptibility of BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice to infection with a field isolate of mouse parvovirus (1). J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 45:72 [Google Scholar]
- 37.Redig AJ, Besselsen DG. 2001. Detection of rodent parvoviruses by fluorogenic nuclease polymerase chain reaction. Comp Med 51:326–331 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Riley LK, Knowles R, Purdy G, Salome N, Pintel D, Hook RR, Jr, Franklin CL, Besch-Williford CL. 1996. Expression of recombinant parvovirus NS1 protein by a baculovirus and application to serologic testing of rodents. J Clin Microbiol 34:440–444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Segovia JC, Bueren JA, Almendral JM. 1995. Myeloid depression follows infection of susceptible newborn mice with the parvovirus minute virus of mice (strain i). J Virol 69:3229–3232 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Segovia JC, Gallego JM, Bueren JA, Almendral JM. 1999. Severe leukopenia and dysregulated erythropoiesis in SCID mice persistently infected with the parvovirus minute virus of mice. J Virol 73:1774–1784 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Segovia JC, Real A, Bueren JA, Almendral JM. 1991. In vitro myelosuppressive effects of the parvovirus minute virus of mice (MVMi) on hematopoietic stem and committed progenitor cells. Blood 77:980–988 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Smith AL, Jacoby RO, Johnson EA, Paturzo F, Bhatt PN. 1993. In vivo studies with an “orphan” parvovirus of mice. Lab Anim Sci 43:175–182 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Soike KF, Iatropoulis M, Siegl G. 1976. Infection of newborn and fetal hamsters induced by inoculation of LuIII parvovirus. Arch Virol 51:235–241 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Toolan HW. 1960. Experimental production of mongoloid hamsters. Science 131:1446–1448 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

