Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 3.
Published in final edited form as: Tetrahedron Lett. 2010 Mar 3;51(9):1329–1332. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2010.01.004

Rational design of a macrocyclic-based chemosensor for anions

Kalpana R Dey a, Bryan M Wong b, Md Alamgir Hossain a,*
PMCID: PMC2855135  NIHMSID: NIHMS169852  PMID: 20401319

Abstract

A macrocyclic-based fluorescence chemosensor has been designed and synthesized from the reaction of dansyl chloride and a hexaaminomacrocycle containing four secondary and two tertiary amines. The new chemosensor has been examined for its binding ability toward phosphate, sulfate, nitrate, iodide, bromide, chloride, and fluoride by fluorescence spectroscopy in DMSO. The results indicate that the compound binds each of the anions with a 1:1 stoichiometry, showing high affinity for the oxoanions, chloride and iodide with the binding constants up to four orders of magnitude. Ab initio calculations based on density functional theory (DFT) suggest that the ligand is deformed in order to encapsulate an anion, and each anion, except fluoride, is bonded to the macrocycle through two NH…X and four CH…X interactions.


Because molecular interactions with anions are prevalent in many environmental and health-related issues, the development of new anion sensors has attracted immense interest in current research.16 In recent years, polyazamacrocyclic-based receptors have been well studied for anions,79 and some of them have been proven as effective systems showing high selectivity and affinity for simple inorganic10 to biological anions.11 Hexaazamonocycles that are conveniently synthesized from the Schiff's base derived cyclization were shown to complex a variety of anions including halides and oxoanions;1216 however, their application as anion sensors has not been explored yet. Indeed, compared to acyclic anion sensors, reports on cyclic anion sensors are quite limited1,7,1619 which often require complicated synthetic pathways. An ideal molecular chemosensor should have active binding sites for recognizing anions along with a suitable optical or electrochemical group for sensing anions.19 In particular, fluorescence chemosensors seem to be attractive due to their simplicity in signal detection and high sensitivity for anions in solution at the ppm level. Herein, we use a simple strategy of making an anion sensor L using a macrocycle and dansyl groups as fluorophore units. We choose a macrocyclic precursor ligand 1 consisting of both secondary and tertiary amines, which by itself is an effective anion receptor.20 This particular combination of two different amines allows the ligand to add dansyl groups at the secondary amines leaving two tertiary amines unreacted that are available for protonation. Therefore, it is expected that the ligand will bind an anion through the protonated tertiary amines while the optical properties of the fluorophores will be changed upon complexation.

The synthesis of precursor 1 was accomplished from the reaction of N-methyl-2,2'-diaminodiethylamine with terephthaldehyde in CH3OH under high dilution condensation and the subsequent reduction of the resulting imine with NaBH4 (Scheme 1) following the procedure previously reported by us.20 The reaction of neutral 1 with four equivalents of dansyl chloride in the presence of K2CO3 in CH3CN afforded the target chemosensor L.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Synthesis of chemosensor L. (i) CH3OH, high dilution, 0 °C, 24 h, (ii) CH3OH, NaBH4, r.t., 12 h, (iii) CH3CN, dansyl chloride, K2CO3, 25 °C, 24 h.

The anion binding ability of the chemosensor was evaluated using [H2L]2+ (prepared from the addition of two equivalents of tosylic acid to L) by fluorescence titration studies (excitation at 350 nm) with [n-Bu4N]+X (X = F, Cl, Br, I, NO3, HSO4 and H2PO4) in DMSO. The fluorescence emission spectra of the ligand (1 × 10−6 M), showed a broad peak at 530 nm when excited at 350 nm. Upon the gradual addition of an anion (1 × 10−4 M) to the ligand solution, a quenching of the fluorescence was observed in each case. Fig. 1a and 2a illustrate the representative fluorescence titration spectra for chloride and phosphate, respectively, derived from the experiments with portionwise additions of the respective anions (0 to 50 equivalents). Such quenching is attributed to the photoinduced electron transfer (PET) process19 from the lone pair of electrons on the unprotonated nitrogens, facilitated from the formation of an anion complex that increases the charge density on the linking nitrogens. However, any spectral shift or the formation of an excimer was not observed during these studies. The ligand showed similar quenching trends in the presence of other anions except fluoride and bromide for which only a small change in the emission was observed (Fig. 3). The relative fluorescence emission (I/I0, where I0 and I are the emissions of the ligand before and after the addition of an anion, respectively) as a function of an anion concentration gave the best fit for a 1:1 association model (Fig. 1b and 2b), yielding the highest binding constants for phosphate among the oxoanions, and chloride among the halide series.21 As shown in Table 1, the association constants derived from the non-linear regression analysis, showed the binding trend, H2PO4 > HSO4 > Cl > NO3 > I > F > Br. The observed data clearly indicate that the binding is largely influenced by electrostatic interactions and size-compatibility between the host and guest. The high affinity for phosphate and sulfate is perhaps due to the strong electrostatic interactions between the two species, as well as the possible contribution from CH…anion interactions as revealed from ab initio calculations discussed in the following section. The weak binding for fluoride is attributed to the mismatch of its size with the cavity, while the bigger anions like iodide and chloride fit into the macrocyclic cavity, showing stronger affinity under the similar conditions. However, bromide was found to interact much weakly compared with other halides, that could be related to its possible bridging in the non-polar solvent leading the formation of tribromide.22

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Change in the fluorescence emission spectra of H2L(Ts)2 with an increasing amount of chloride (R =[chloride]0/[L]0= 0 – 50, excitation at 350 nm, 25 °C) and (b) the fluorescence titration curve as a function of R with I/I0.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) Change in the fluorescence emission spectra of H2L(Ts)2 with an increasing amount of phosphate (R =[phosphate]0/[L]0= 0 – 50, excitation at 350 nm, 25 °C) and (b) the fluorescence titration curve as a function of R with I/I0.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Plot of change in emission of H2L(Ts)2 with increasing amount of anion (R = 0 – 50) at 530 nm.

Table 1.

Association constants (K) and binding energies (E) of the anion complexes of [H2L]2+.

Anion Ka, M−1 Eb, kcal/mol
Fluoride 1.3 × 104 −176.4
Chloride 4.0 × 104 −154.8
Bromide 3.6 × 103 + 37.5
Iodide 3.8 × 104 c
Nitrate 3.9 × 104 −147.8
Sulfate 4.5 × 104 −302.9
Phosphate 6.4 × 104 −590.1
a

Association constant determined by fluorescence titrations in DMSO at 25 °C (error limit is less than 20%)

b

binding energy obtained from DFT calculations

c

the 6–31+G(d,p) basis set is not available for iodide.

In order to investigate the properties of the anion-ligand complexes, with a view of estimating binding energies, we also carried out ab initio calculations based on density functional theory (DFT). Since the anion-ligand systems involve hydrogen bonding interactions, it is important to choose an exchange-correlation functional which accurately captures these electronic effects. To this end, all DFT calculations were performed using the M06-2X23 hybrid functional which incorporates an improved description of dispersion energies, an effect which was previously found to be necessary for describing noncovalent interactions.24 The initial equilibrium geometry for the free protonated ligand with two positive charges (H2L2+) was first optimized at the M06-2X/MidiX level of theory. From this equilibrium geometry, each of the negatively charged anions was added near the two protonated amines at the center of the ligand. The geometry of the anion-ligand complex was then optimized at the M06-2X/MidiX level of theory. Single-point energies with the 6–31G(d,p) basis set (a diffuse 6–31+G(d,p) basis set was used for all of the anions) were subsequently performed for each of the M06-2X/MidiX relaxed geometries. The optimized structure of the ligand and some representative structures are shown in Fig. 4. The structure of free H2L2+ was optimized in a rectangular fashion (Fig. 4A) as seen in the p-xylyl macrocycle13 and forms a suitable cavity to host an anion. From our DFT-optimized complexes, we found that the ligand deformed its geometry in order to encapsulate each of the anions.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Optimized structures: diprotonated L (A), fluoride complex (B), chloride complex (C) and sulfate complex (D).

The calculated binding energies for the complexes, as shown in Table 1, roughly correlated with the charge and electronegativity of the anion. Specifically, an anion with a larger charge demonstrated increased binding (PO43− > SO42− > NO3), and an anion with a larger electronegativity showed higher binding energies (F > Cl > Br). Interestingly, each of the anions except fluoride formed two NH…X and four additional CH…X bonds from the methylene groups close to the tertiary amines. Although, the attachment of dansyl groups makes the secondary amines unavailable for protonation, the ligand binds an anion strongly. As reported previously, the parent ligand 1 in its tertraprotonated form was found to show moderate binding affinity (K = 500 M−1) for bromide in CDCl3, that was determined by 1H NMR titrations.20 In the present case, the observed high binding constants measured at much dilute conditions (1 × 10−6 M compared with 5 × 10−3 M) can be attributed to the decreased salt effect25 as well as the involvement of CH…anion interactions.26,27 The small fluoride, however, failed to coordinate with one of the protons on the tertiary amines. In the case of the bromide complex, a large deformation occurred after the encapsulation of the anion, resulting in a slightly positive binding energy. Thus the observed binding energy of the complex is fairly consistent with the lower binding affinity for bromide as compared to that for chloride in solution (K = 3.6 × 103 for bromide vs K = 4.0 × 104 M−1 for chloride). The variations in binding energies indicate a significant change in electronic structure among the anion-ligand complexes, confirming the experimental observation of fluorescence quenching for each of the complexes.

In conclusion, we report a macrocyclic-based fluorescence chemosensor using an azamacrocycle and dansyl group, which effectively binds oxoanions and halides showing strong affinity for phosphate and chloride. The addition of an anion to the chemosensor did not affect the fluorescence emission wavelength (350 nm) for H2L2+, thus not allowing the direct identification of different anion species, however it resulted a significant quenching of fluorescence emission at different magnitude. DFT calculations indicate that an anion is coordinated not only with the NH groups, but also with CH2 attached to the tertiary nitrogens, supporting the higher binding constants observed in solution. The complexation process leads to a significant change in the electronic density of the attached fluorophores resulting in the quenching of florescence emission. The unique combination of fluorescence experiments coupled with DFT calculations allow a guided understanding towards the rational design for other macrocyclic-based sensors.

Supplementary Material

01

Acknowledgments

The project described was supported by grant no. G12RR013459 from the National Center for Research Resources. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under CHE-0821357. The facilities from analytical core laboratory at Jackson State University is greatly appreciated.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Supplementary Material Experimental procedure for the synthesis of L and H2L(Ts)2, Figures showing the 1H NMR peaks assignment of the ligand, experimental procedure for titrations, the change in the fluorescence emission spectra in presence of different anions, the optimized structures of the complexes and calculated hydrogen bond distances. Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version, at doi:xxxxxx.

References

  • 1.Martinez-Manez R, Sancenon F. Chem. Rev. 2003;13:4419–4476. doi: 10.1021/cr010421e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lou X, Qiang L, Qin J, Li Z. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2009;1:2529–2535. doi: 10.1021/am900467b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dahan A, Ashkenazi T, Kuznetsov V, Makievski S, Drug E, Fadeev L, Bramson M, Schokoroy S, Rozenshine-Kemelmakher E, Gozin M. J. Org. Chem. 2007;72:2289–2296. doi: 10.1021/jo061774m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lin ZH, Zhao YG, Duan CY, Zhang BG, Bai ZP. Dalton Trans. 2006:3678–3684. doi: 10.1039/b601282e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gunnlaugsson T, Davis AP, O'Brien JE, Glynn M. Org. Lett. 2003;4:2449–2452. doi: 10.1021/ol026004l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lee DH, Im JH, Lee JH, Hong JI. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002;43:9637–9640. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Caltagirone C, Gale PA. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009;38:520–563. doi: 10.1039/b806422a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gale PA. Acc. Chem. Res. 2006;39:465–475. doi: 10.1021/ar040237q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bowman-James K. Acc. Chem. Res. 2005;38:671–678. doi: 10.1021/ar040071t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hossain MA. Curr. Org. Chem. 2008;12:1231–1256. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.García-España E, Díaz P, Llinares JM, Bianchi A. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006;250:2952–2986. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Saeed MA, Thompson JJ, Fronczek FR, Hossain MA. CrystEngComm. 2010 doi: 10.1039/b918152k. DOI: 10.1039=b918152k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Saeed MA, Thompson JJ, Fronczek FR, Hossain MA. Acta Cryst. 2009;E65:o2405. doi: 10.1107/S1600536809035648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Clifford T, Danby A, Llinares JM, Mason S, Alcock NW, Powell D, Aguilar JA, García-España E, Bowman-James K. Inorg. Chem. 2001;40:4710–4720. doi: 10.1021/ic010135l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wiórkiewicz-Kuczera J, Kuczera K, Bazzicalupe C, Bencini A, Valtancoli B, Bianchi A, Bowman-James K. New J. Chem. 1999;23:1007–1013. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Papoyan G, Gu K, Wiórkiewicz-Kuczera J, Kuczera K, Bowman-James K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996;118:1354–364. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Amendola V, Bergamaschi G, Buttafava A, Fabbrizzi L, Monzani E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. doi: 10.1021/ja9046262. Article ASAP, DOI: 10.1021/ja9046262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ghosh K, Sarkar AR. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50:85–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Martínez-Máñez R, Sancenón F. J. Fluoresc. 2005;15:267–285. doi: 10.1007/s10895-005-2626-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gibson D, Dey KR, Fronczek FR, Hossain MA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50:6537–6539. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.09.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schneider HJ, Kramer R, Simova S, Schneider U. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988;110:6442–6448. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Garcia-Rio L, Mejuto JC, Ciri R, Blagoeva IB, Leis JR, Ruasse MF. Phys. Chem. B. 1999;103:4997–5004. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhao Y, Truhlar DG. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2008;120:215–241. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wong BM. J. Comput. Chem. 2009;30:51–56. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hossain MA, Schneider H-J. Chem. Eur. J. 1999;5:1284–1290. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bryantsev VS, Hay BP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:8282–8283. doi: 10.1021/ja0518272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lakshminarayanan PS, Kumar DK, Ghosh P. Inorg. Chem. 2005;44:7540–7546. doi: 10.1021/ic051191f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

RESOURCES