Table 2.
Comparison between breadth of response at cervix and in blood
| Cumulative magnitude (spot-forming units/106) |
Gag pools differently targeted |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient ID | Blood | Cervix | Gag pools shared | Blood | Cervix |
| 9 | 8040 | 7130 | 1,2,5 | 3,4 | – |
| 19 | 4605 | 5280 | 2 | – | 1 |
| 22 | 3565 | 2640 | 2,3 | – | – |
| 2 | 2610 | 13 240 | 3,5 | – | 2 |
| 21 | 2440 | 490 | 3 | – | – |
| 7 | 1740 | 3540 | 2 | – | – |
| 17 | 1480 | 13 553 | 2 | 3,5 | 1 |
| 13 | 1000 | 0 | – | 1,2,3 | – |
| 14 | 1100 | 0 | – | 1,2,3,4,5 | – |
| 6 | 850 | 0 | – | 3,5 | – |
| 15 | 600 | 1140 | – | 2 | – |
| 10 | 360 | 0 | – | 2,4 | – |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | – | 2 | – |
| 12 | 165 | 0 | – | 1 | – |
| 3 | 120 | 0 | – | – | – |
| 1 | 0 | 350 | – | – | 5 |
| Median | 1050 | 420 | |||
| Range | 0–8040 | 0–13 553 | |||