Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010 May;16(5):765–775. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21146

Cdcs1 a major colitis susceptibility locus in mice; subcongenic analysis reveals genetic complexity

Andre Bleich 1,*, Gwen Büchler 1,*, Jason Beckwith 2, Lydia M Petell 2, Jason P Affourtit 2, Benjamin L King 2, Daniel J Shaffer 2,#, Derry C Roopenian 2, Hans J Hedrich 1, John P Sundberg 2, Edward H Leiter 2
PMCID: PMC2857671  NIHMSID: NIHMS181709  PMID: 19856416

Abstract

Background

The cytokine-deficiency induced colitis susceptibility (Cdcs)1 locus is a major modifier of murine IBD and was originally identified in experimental crosses of interleukin-10-deficient (Il10−/−) mice. Congenic mice, in which this locus was reciprocally transferred between IBD-susceptible C3H/HeJBir-Il10−/− and resistant C57BL/6J-Il10−/− mice, revealed that this locus likely acts by inducing innate hypo- and adaptive hyperresponsiveness, associated with impaired NFKB responses of macrophages. The aim of the present study was to dissect the complexity of Cdcs1 by further development and characterization of reciprocal Cdcs1 congenic strains and to identify potential candidate genes in the congenic interval.

Methods

In total, 15 reciprocal congenic strains were generated from Il10−/− mice of either C3H/HeJBir or C57BL/6J genetic backgrounds by 10 cycles of backcrossing. Colitis activity was monitored by histological grading. Candidate genes were identified by fine mapping of congenic intervals, sequencing, microarray analysis and a high-throughput real-time RT-PCR approach using bone marrow-derived macrophages.

Results

Within the originally identified Cdcs1-interval, three independent regions were detected that likely contain susceptibility-determining genetic factors (Cdcs1.1, Cdcs1.2, and Cdcs1.3). Combining results of candidate gene approaches revealed Fcgr1, Cnn3, Larp7, and Alpk1 as highly attractive candidate genes with polymorphisms in coding or regulatory regions and expression differences between susceptible and resistant mouse strains.

Conclusions

Subcongenic analysis of the major susceptibility locus Cdcs1 on mouse chromosome 3 revealed a complex genetic structure. Candidate gene approaches revealed attractive genes within the identified regions.

Keywords: Mucosal Immunology, Animal Models of IBD, Adaptive Immune System in IBD, Innate Immune System in IBD, Inflammation in IBD

INTRODUCTION

In the interleukin-10-deficient (Il10−/−) mouse model of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), 10 quantitative trait loci (QTL) have been shown to be associated with colitis susceptibility by linkage analyses on experimental crosses of highly susceptible C3H/HeJBir (C3Bir)-Il10−/− and partially resistant C57BL/6J (B6)-Il10−/− mice.1,2 The strongest locus (C3Bir-derived cytokine deficiency-induced colitis susceptibility [Cdcs]1 on chromosome [Chr] 3) controlled multiple colitogenic subphenotypes and contributed the vast majority to the phenotypic variance in cecum and colon. This was demonstrated by interval-specific Chr 3 congenic mice wherein defined regions of Cdcs1 from C3Bir or B6 were bred into the IL-10-deficient reciprocal background and altered the susceptible or resistant phenotype. While the longest congenic regions reproduced the donor background phenotypes faithfully, reduction in the length of the congenic interval significantly attenuated such phenotypic effects.3,4 The finding of weaker effects contributed by multiple subcongenic intervals coupled with the finding of multiple linkage peaks across the Cdcs1 confidence interval in the original mapping study indicated a very complex genetic structure of the Chr 3 locus.1,2,5 Interestingly, the Cdcs1-linkage to colitis was replicated in the Gnai2 (also known as Gαi2)-deficient mouse model of IBD,6 underlining the crucial role of this Chr 3 locus in mucosal homeostasis.

In subsequent immunological studies it was shown that the colitogenic Chr 3 haplotype containing the C3Bir Cdcs1 allele impaired proinflammatory cytokine response of bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM) to toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands and in turn skewed the adaptive CD4+ T-cell immune response toward compensatory hyperresponsiveness and chronic intestinal inflammation.3 This innate hyporesponsiveness was associated with a constitutively higher expression of NFκB p50, an NFκB-product associated with hyporesponsiveness of monocytic cells to bacterial stimulation,7 and with a diminished NFκB-response after TNF-stimulation.3 This finding is in line with recent studies showing that impaired innate immune responses caused by epithelial cells lacking NFκB activation,8 or lamina propria dendritic cells with disturbed TNF secretion due to T-bet deficiency,9 lead to mucosal barrier defects and subsequent IBD. Importantly, NFκB1 haplotypes and functional promoter polymorphisms are associated with IBD-phenotypes.10,11

The aim of the present study was to dissect the complexity of Cdcs1 by further development and characterization of reciprocal subcongenic strains (now backcrossed 10 generations to the IL-10-deficient parental backgrounds). Furthermore, we aimed to refine the list of candidate genes by identifying polymorphic genes in the subcongenic strains and by gene expression analyses of BMDM cultures using microarray and regional specific array technology.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Mice and Interval-Specific Congenic Strains

Mice were produced at The Jackson Laboratory (JAX) in a standard conventional specific pathogen free vivarium, free of mouse pathogens except for Helicobacter hepaticus and Klebsiella oxytoca. Reciprocal congenic strains were generated from Il10tm1Cgn (Il10−/−) mice of either C3H/HeJBir (C3Bir) or C57BL/6J (B6) backgrounds as described previously,3 and backcrossed for a total of 10 generations (N10) for this study. A summary of the congenic elements that were transferred into the subcongenic B6.C3Bir-Cdcs1 (BC-R) or C3Bir.B6-Cdcs1 (CB-R) Il10−/− lines and the markers used for genotyping are depicted in Figure 1. For fine mapping, some strains (see below) were transferred into the vivarium of the Hannover Medical School and maintained in individually ventilated cages as described elsewhere.12

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1

Genotype and phenotype of Il10−/− Chr 3 interval-specific congenic mouse strains. Different subcongenic B6.C3Bir-Cdcs1 (BC; 1A & 1C) or C3Bir.B6-Cdcs1 (CB; 1B & 1D) lines (denoted as R1-R8), the markers used for genotyping with positions in mega base pairs (Mbp), cecum/colon total scores, numbers (N) of mice used for analysis, and detailed p-values (Fig. 1A–B) are shown. The candidate gene intervals determined by the respective congenic set of mice are highlighted in Fig 1A and 1B. Resistant (R), susceptible (S), intermediate (I) was defined based on results of the Median test, determining whether a given congenic strain differed from either the B6-Il10−/− or the C3Bir-Il10−/− parental strain or both. Figures 1C and 1D show typhlitis scores (single values and medians) of male or female B6-Il10−/−, C3Bir-Il10−/−, and BC-R7 (Fig. 1C) or CB-R6 (Fig. 1D) mice and p-values determined by the Newman-Keuls Multiple Comparison Test; ns = not significant; na = not applicable.

Histological scoring and statistical analysis

Colitis activity was monitored by histological grading of intestinal lesions on hematoxylin & eosin stained specimens according to the “JAX-score”.5 Briefly, colon and cecum tissues were scored based on lesion severity, ulceration, hyperplasia and percentage of area involved, resulting in a maximum possible score of 12 for the cecum and 36 for the colon. Cecum and colon scores were used to compare disease susceptibility between the Il10−/−background and congenic strains. As Bartlett’s test for equal variances revealed dissimilar variances between the groups, the Median test was used for statistical analysis instead of ANOVA or Mann-Whitney-U-tests as recommended by Kasuya,13 and exact p-values were calculated as proposed by Mundry & Fisher.14 Significance levels were set to alpha ≤ 0.05 (indicative) and ≤ 0.0064 (Fig. 1A) or ≤ 0.0073 (Fig. 1B) for significance; the latter two values determined by using the Dunn-Šidák correction to correct for multiple testing (α = 1 − [1 − 0.05]1/γ; γ = number of comparisons). In the case of BC-R7 and CB-R6, variances did not differ after seperating for sexes and ANOVA with subsequent Newman-Keuls Multiple Comparison Test were used for analysis with significance levels set to alpha ≤ 0.05.

Derivation of BMDM and generation of cDNA for Affymetrix chip analysis

BMDM were obtained from 3 male mice per genotype (IL-10-deficient C3Bir and B6 parental males and the reciprocal CB-R1 and BC-R3 congenics; see Fig. 1). Cells were cultured in polystyrene 6-well culture plates (Corning, Corning, NY) at a density of 3 × 106/mL in RPMI1640 medium plus 10% fetal calf serum for six days as described previously.3 Culture medium was changed every third day. On the last day of culture, 3 wells per plate were stimulated with CBir1 flagellin (1 μg/mL culture medium; kindly provided by Dr. C. Elson, University of Alabama, Birmingham).15 After incubation for additional 4 hours, media were removed and replaced with 2 mL of PBS.

For RNA extraction, cells from each donor in medium only and medium + flagellin (3 wells each) were harvested and pooled in a total of 2 mL Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA.). After passing the lysate through a 20G needle 5–6 times, RNA was extracted following the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA quality and yield was determined using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer and RNA 6000 Nano LabChip assay (Agilent Technologies Inc, Palo Alto, CA). Following reverse transcription with an oligo(dT)-T7 primer (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA), double-stranded cDNA was synthesized with the Superscript double-stranded cDNA synthesis custom kit (Invitrogen). The cDNA was linearly amplified and labeled with biotinylated nucleotides (Enzo Diagnostics, Farmingdale, NY) in an in vitro transcription reaction using T7 RNA polymerase.

Microarray Experiment

Microarray experiments were performed as triplicates. Biotin-labeled and fragmented cRNA (15 μg) was hybridized onto MOE430v2.0 GeneChip arrays (Affymetrix) for 16 hours at 45°C. Post-hybridization staining and washing were performed according to manufacturer’s protocols using the Fluidics Station 450 instrument (Affymetrix). Finally, the arrays were scanned with a GeneChip Scanner 3000 laser confocal slide scanner. The images were quantified using GeneChip(TM) Operating Software (GCOS) v1.2 and expression values summarized using the Robust MultiChip Average function,16 in the R/affy package.17 An analysis of variance (ANOVA) model was applied and F1, F2, F3 and Fs test statistics were constructed along with their permutation p-values.18 False discovery rate (FDR),19 was then assessed using the R/qvalue package to estimate q-values from calculated test statistics. Cluster analysis was performed using Genesis.20 Functional annotations were assigned using Gene Ontology (http://www.informatics.jax.org/function.shtml).

Regional specific quantitative expression profile

RNA was obtained from BMDM from both the B6 and C3Bir wildtype male mice as described above. Expression of 46 genes was analyzed using real-time RT-PCR and the Global Pattern Recognition (GPR) algorithm as described previously.21 In summary, synthesis of cDNA from 5–10 μL of total RNA was carried out using the Retroscript kit (Ambion) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. Primer sets (MWG Biotech; sequences are available on request) were designed using Primer Express v1.5 (Applied Biosystems, ABI). Specificity to the desired gene target was ensured by bidirectional sequencing of PCR products and by generating SYBR Green dissociation curves. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR was carried out using a SYBR Green Master Mix (ABI) and data were collected on the ABI Prism 7700 Sequence Detection System v1.7 using the default reaction conditions. The baseline and threshold were set to experimentally determined values and the Experimental Report data (a table of Ct values for each reaction) were exported for GPR analysis that compared the Ct of each candidate gene individually with the Ct of every other gene in the data set that is eligible as a normalizer. For each gene-normalizer combination, the individual ΔCt values generated for the two mouse strains were compared by a two-tailed heteroscedastic (unpaired) Student’s t-test, and a “hit” was recorded if the p-value from the t-test falled below defined p-values (0.05 and 0.01).21

Fine mapping and sequencing

Congenic elements of selected strains (see Fig. 1) were fine mapped by PCR detection of microsatellite markers and sequencing of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs; primer sequences and conditions used available on request). Microsatellite markers were either chosen from the The Jackson Laboratory’s online Mouse Genome Informatics resource (www.informatics.jax.org) with physical map positions confirmed by using the UCSC genome browser (genome.ucsc.edu), or microsatellites were chosen from the UCSC genome browser and primers were designed for amplification using Primer3 (http://fokker.wi.mit.edu/).

SNPs between C3H/HeJ and B6 were selected using the The Jackson Laboratory’s Mouse Phenome Database (http://phenome.jax.org/pub-cgi/phenome/mpdcgi?rtn=docs/home). Detection of these SNPs in our strains was achieved by amplification and sequencing of 200–400 bp products using primers created with Primer3 or Limstill (limstill.niob.knaw.nl). PCR was carried out using using REDExtract-N-AMP-PCR ReadyMix (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) and PCR products were gel purified using the Nucleo Spin Extract II Kit (Machery&Nagel, Düren, Germany) and sequenced by Sequence Laboratories Göttingen GmbH (Göttingen, Germany). Sequences were translated (www.expasy.ch/tools/dna.html) and secondary structures predicted (http://npsa-pbil.ibcp.fr/cgi-bin/npsa_automat.pl?page=npsa_gor4.html).

RESULTS

Characterization of reciprocal congenic strains

In total, 15 Il10−/− strains subcongenic for Chr 3 intervals were used for a detailed analysis of alterations in disease susceptibility associated with the transfer of these genetic elements. The most significant phenotypic deviations from the respective parental control backgrounds were seen in subcongenic mice necropsied between 5–9 weeks of age (Fig. 1) although similar differences were also detected in necropsies of older mice (not shown). Figure 1A shows histopathologic scores for cecum and colon for Il10−/− subcongenic strains produced on the nominally resistant B6 background and carrying C3Bir-derived intervals around Cdcs1 (B6.C3Bir-Cdcs1 [BC-R] Il10−/− lines). As depicted in Figure 1A, only mice harboring C3Bir alleles between 87.1 and 131.1 mega base pairs (Mbp) showed increased colitis susceptibility. Mice of the strains BC-R1 and BC-R3 only differed in the marker allele at 89.1 Mbp but showed similar colitis-susceptible histological scores and were therefore combined for the analysis (denoted as BC-R1/R3). It should be noted that the strain BC-R2 was previously reported to be free of colitis lesions.3 It was subsequently found that the targeted Il10 allele had been inadvertently lost, an error that has since been corrected by reintroduction of the targeted allele.4 Although only a few mice of the strain BC-R2 were available for comparison because of poor fecundity in the Bar Harbor colony, they clearly showed accelerated onset and more severe inflammation than B6 mice (Fig. 1A); this was also seen in BC-R2 mice imported to the Hannover Medical School (not included in the analysis). BC-R7 mice showed a B6-Il10−/− like phenotype in the colon; however, mice of this strain, especially male mice, were very susceptible for histological lesions in the cecum and displayed similar or even higher typhlitis scores than C3Bir-Il10−/− mice (see below).

The finding that not only strains with elements covering the complete interval from 87.1 to 131.1 Mbp (BC-R1, BC-R2, and BC-R3), but also shorter interval congenics in this region (BC-R7 and BC-R8) became susceptible (at least partially in the case of BC-R7) indicates the presence of multiple contributing loci. In Figure 1A–B, the Nfkb1 locus is marked because of electrophoretic mobility gel shift assay differences in NFκB in parental strain macrophages reported previously 3. However, C3Bir genome spanning the Nfkb1 structural gene alone was insufficient to elicit colitic lesions, as evidenced by the BC-R4 and BC-R6 strains.

Figure 1B compares phenotypes of mice of the susceptible C3Bir background carrying B6-derived resistance elements on Chr 3 (C3Bir.B6-Cdcs1 [CB-R] Il10−/− lines). The data indicate that an interval between 89.1 and 126.7 Mbp likely confers resistance. Strains CB-R5.1 and CB-R5.2 harbor similar donor intervals with the exception that the B6 Nfkb1 allele is included in the donor interval for CB-R5.1. The finding of comparably severe histopathology scores in these two strains (combined for analysis) despite different origins of the Nfkb1 locus, again shows that the Nfkb1 locus itself is not a primary determinant of phenotype.

After seperating for sexes, we observed that male mice of the strain BC-R7 and CB-R6, two strains carrying C3Bir elements in the proximal part of the candidate gene interval and being resistant in the colon, showed susceptibility to disease in the cecum (Fig. 1C–D). Considering that strains on both genetic backgrounds harboring C3Bir alleles throughout this region appear fully susceptible, and also that the strain BC-R8 with C3Bir genotype in the distal part of the candidate gene interval appears fully susceptible, this indicates that modifiers selective for cecal lesions may exist that are located in the proximal part of the candidate gene interval and that are influenced by sex.

Two congenic strains followed only partly the pattern described above, illustrating the complex genetics of the model. CB-R2 mice showed an intermediate phenotype in the cecum despite presence of B6 alleles throughout the candidate gene interval on Chr 3 (Fig. 1B). This finding remained stable even in older mice. Less than 10 week-old mice of the strain BC-R5 (that carried C3Bir alleles from the Nfkb1 locus to D3Mit17, data not shown) were susceptible for lesions in the cecum but showed resistance in the colon. In contrast, BC-R5 mice older than 11 weeks showed resistance also in the cecum, indicating remission of inflammation.

Fine mapping and positional candidate genes identified by sequencing

For further dissection of Cdcs1, fine mapping of selected congenic regions (those of BC-R2, BC-R4, BC-R8, and BC-R7 as well as CB-R6 and CB-R8) was performed using microsatellite markers and sequencing of SNPs. Three independent regions were detected that likely contain susceptibility-determining genetic factors. The first interval (Cdcs1.1; 88.1 to 108.8 Mbp, Fig. 2) spans the congenic element of the susceptible BC-R7 strain and overlaps the congenic element of the highly susceptible BC-R2 strain. This region contains 46 genes with coding non-synonymous SNPs (Supplementary Table 1). Among these genes some stand out as candidates because of their function: Muc1, Fcgr1, Cd2 and Cd160.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Subcongenic strain pair illustrating the Cdcs1.1 interval. Comparison of the highly susceptible BC-R2 and partially susceptible BC-R7 mice, the latter showing susceptibility in the cecum (males), indicates genetic modifiers in a region from 88.1 to 108.8 Mbp on Chr 3. Mbp = mega base pairs; S = susceptible; R = resistant; ex. = exon.

The second region (Cdcs1.2; 120.0 to 123.0 Mbp, Fig. 3) resulted from comparing B6 and C3Bir alleles of CB-R6 and CB-R8 mice and contains a total of 27 genes; none of which harbor coding non-synonymous polymorphisms according to the Mouse Phenome Database. We verified six SNPs within putative regulatory regions of four candidate genes, Tmem56, Alg14, Cnn3 and Slc44a3 (Table 1). As expression differences were detected for Cnn3 by microarray analyses (see below), polymorphisms detected in the promoter region might indeed modify expression of this gene.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Subcongenic strain pair illustrating the Cdcs1.2 interval. Colon phenotypes of CB-R6 and CB-R8 mice suggest alleles that contribute to disease susceptibility between 120.0 and 123.0 Mbp on Chr 3. Mbp = mega base pairs; S = susceptible; R = resistant; ex. = exon

TABLE 1.

Polymorphisms detected in putative regulatory regions of candidate genes

Mbp Gene RefSNP ID Down-/upstream* Nucleotide
B6 C3Bir
120.9 Tmem56 rs30109541 Down G A
121.0 Alg14 rs47441003 Up A T
121.2 Cnn3/Slc44a3 rs13464154** Down G A
121.2 Cnn3/Slc44a3 rs6212614** Down T C
121.2 Cnn3/Slc44a3 rs49731762** Down C Del.
121.2 Cnn3/Slc44a3 rs30203293** Down G A
*

Within 2000 bp down- or upstream of the start or stop codon, respectively.

**

These SNPs are located between the genes Cnn3 and Slc44a3.

The positions of the genes on chromosome 3 are given in mega base pairs (Mbp). Del = deletion

Phenotypes of BC-R2 and BC-R8 mice indicate a third interval (Cdcs1.3; 125.6 to 128.0 Mbp, Fig. 4) that contains a total of 13 genes; five of which were verified by sequencing to contain coding non-synonymous SNPs (Ank2, LOC100043364, Larp7, 4930422G04Rik, and Alpk1, Table 2). In silico analyses revealed that all SNPs (one in Ank2 and Larp7, two in Alpk1 and 4930422G04Rik, and five in Loc100043364) change the secondary structure of the respective proteins except one SNP in the 4930422G04Rik gene. Both SNPs in Alpk1 are located in a region which is conserved between mice, humans, and rats, and one of them is located in a functional region coding for alpha kinase. The SNPs in the 4930422G04Rik gene are also located in a conserved area, and one changes the secondary structure of the DNA/RNA helicase of this gene.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Subcongenic strain pair illustrating the Cdcs1.3 interval. Phenotypes of BC-R2 and BC-R8 mice indicate genetic factors that contribute to disease susceptibility between 125.6 and 128.0 Mbp on Chr 3. This candidate gene interval results from the presumption that BC-R8 and BC-R2 share common modifier; however, if BC-R8 mice carry independent modifier genes, a maximum of 1.3 Mbp (including the gene EG668828) have to be added to the candidate gene interval, as BC-R4 mice are resistant and carry C3Bir alleles at 129.3 Mbp. Mbp = mega base pairs; S = susceptible; R = resistant; ex. = exon

TABLE 2.

Polymorphisms detected in the coding region of candidate genes

Mbp Gene RefSNP ID Exon Nucleotide Amino acid
B6 C3Bir Pos. B6 → C3Bir
126.9 Ank2 rs30540733 1 C T 213 ASN→ASP
127.2 Loc100043364 rs31724259 1 A C 7 LEU→ARG
127.2 Loc100043364 ENSMUS SNP4125122 1 T C 27 ARG→GLY
127.2 Loc100043364 rs30699516 1 C T 31 ALA→THR
127.2 Loc100043364 rs31195770 1 G A 56 PRO→LEU
127.2 Loc100043364 rs31640604 1 G A 106 PRO→SER
127.3 Larp7 rs13462046 7 C G 242 VAL→LEU
127.3 4930422G04Rik rs31431528 23 A G 801 SER→GLY
127.3 4930422G04Rik rs31344677 24 G A 848 VAL→ILE
127.4 Alpk1 rs45651673 12 T C 1097 ILE→VAL
127.4 Alpk1 rs31148189 2 G C 16 GLN→GLU

The positions of the genes on chromosome 3 are given in mega base pairs (Mbp).

A complete list of sequencing results is shown in Supplementary Table 2. A list showing the names of all genes mentioned is provided in Supplementary Table 3.

Candidate genes identified by microarray analysis

As strain specific, Cdcs1-inherited differences in innate immune response were observed after stimulation of BMDM with CBir1 flagellin,3 we used the same approach to detect global gene expression differences. Therefore, BMDM of C3Bir-Il10−/− and B6-Il10−/− as well as the Il10−/− reciprocal congenic strains CB-R1 and BC-R3 (harboring the long congenic elements covering the whole Cdcs1-region) were cultured and stimulated with CBir1 flagellin or left unstimulated.

A total of 3939 probesets were found to be differentially expressed (defined as at least ±1.5 fold expression differences) between C3Bir-Il10−/− and B6-Il10−/− BMDM after comparing expression values in either unstimulated or stimulated cells of both strains (2284 probesets in unstimulated, 560 in stimulated, and 1095 in both stimulated and unstimulated cells). These probesets were selected for cluster analysis, and genes of certain clusters were subsequently annotated using Gene Ontology (GO; results are shown in Supplementary Fig. 1). In summary, it became obvious that the genetic background explained most of the differential gene expression observed. However, a large number of the genes whose expression was influenced by the congenic interval likely share common processes such as DNA-metabolism, cell adhesion, cell organization and biogenesis, and development (including development of hematopoietic and lymphoid organs) like the candidate genes Fcgr1 and Cnn3.

We subsequently selected genes that were both affected in their expression by the congenic interval and located in the Cdcs1 region (indicating cis-regulation) to identify further candidate genes. These genes had to show at least 1.5 fold expression difference not only between the background strains, but also between congenic strains, demonstrating the impact of Cdcs1 on their regulation. These genes are listed in Table 3. By taking the candidate gene intervals identified by subcongenic analyses into account, the list of candidates includes besides the already mentioned Fcgr1 and Cnn3 also Olfml3, Chi3l3/Chi3l4, 9030201C23Rik, and Ccdc109b.

TABLE 3.

Likely Cis-regulated genes located in the transferred congenic intervals

Gene Probe Set ID Fold change Position (Mbp)
Background strains (C3Bir- vs B6-Il10−/−) Congenic Strains (CB-R1 vs BC-R3)
Unstim. Stim. Unstim. Stim.
Fcgr1 1417876_at −1.7 −1.1 1.3 1.7 96.1
Olfml3 1448475_at −5.1 −7.5 5.6 5.2 103.5
Chi3l3/Chi3l4 1425451_s_at −1.3 −1.5 6.6 5.3 106.0
9030201C23Rik 1454503_at −1.4 −1.7 1.6 1.5 116.6
Cnn3* 1426724_at −2.2 −1.2 1.6 1.2 121.1
1456380_x_at −2.4 −1.1 1.5 1.2
1455570_x_at −3.0 −1.3 2.0 1.5
1436836_x_at −3.3 −1.3 2.2 1.4
1436759_x_at −3.4 −1.3 2.3 1.5
Ccdc109b 1418778_at −2.8 −2.8 1.6 1.6 130.0
Gbp1 1420549_at 34.6 16.8 −9.8 −16.0 142.2
Cyr61* 1438133_a_at −2.1 −1.3 2.4 1.4 145.3
1416039_x_at −2.4 −1.4 2.1 1.3
Mcoln3* 1450148_at −1.3 −1.5 1.9 2.4 145.8
1437540_at −1.9 −1.8 3.2 2.5
Ifi44 1423555_a_at 3.6 15.4 −3.7 −2.7 151.4
H28* 1421596_s_at 29.0 30.1 −26.4 −26.8 151.4
1425917_at 16.8 16.4 −19.4 −18.0
1450301_at 1.7 1.6 −1.8 −1.5
*

Represented by more than one probe set.

Only probe sets showing ≥ 1.5 fold expression difference in at least one background strain comparison (stimulated or unstimulated) and one congenic strain comparison (stimulated or unstimulated) are listed in this table. The positions of the genes on chromosome 3 are given in mega base pairs (Mbp).

Concerning global gene expression, we observed that the majority of genes were found to be down regulated in C3Bir BMDM, including a variety of genes involved in immune processes. This also applied to a cluster of genes that showed a similar but much more pronounced response to stimulation in B6 compared to C3Bir BMDM. This is in line with the previous observation of an innate hyporesponsiveness in C3Bir. As expected, genes with known allelic differences in B6 and C3Bir were detected in the respective clusters, like Gbp1 (located in the congenic interval and down-regulated in B6) or H2-Ea (which contains a mutation in B6 and is down-regulated in this strain).

Regional specific quantitative expression profile

A high-throughput real-time RT-PCR strategy and the GPR algorithm,21 were used to analyze quantitative expression of a set of genes specific for the Cdcs1 interval in BMDM. B6 and C3Bir wildtype mice were used for isolating BMDM for this approach, because differences in Cdcs1 expression at the macrophage level should not require IL-10-deficiency. Significantly differentially expressed genes from the GPR output are shown in Table 4. Of these genes, Larp7 and Alpk1 were noted previously because of coding non-synonymous SNPs (Table 2), and Ccdc109b because of expression differences detected by microarray analysis (Table 3). The most striking expression difference detected by this analysis was observed for Ugt8a. This gene carries a coding non-synonymous SNP (GLU→LYS) in exon 5 that was confirmed by sequencing. Interestingly, all three probes used to detect Nfkb1 expression were differentially expressed at a significance level of p < 0.05.

TABLE 4.

Cdcs1 specific expression profile determined by real-time RT-PCR and GPR analysis with scores of differentially expressed genes at significance levels p<0.05 and p<0.01

Gene Score (p<0.01)* Score (p<0.05)* Fold Change** Chr. 3 Mbp
Ugt8a 0.913 0.978 38.78 125.86
Larp7 0.848 0.957 −5.02 127.53
Dkk2 0.826 0.913 6.30 132.02
Alpk1 0.804 0.870 2.88 127.66
Ccdc109b 0.717 0.870 −3.24 129.91
Ccdc109b 0.717 0.826 −2.43 129.91
Arsj 0.478 0.826 4.01 126.36
Camk2d 0.413 0.587 −1.31 126.59
Nfkb1 ns 0.739 −2.18 135.52
Rap1gds1 ns 0.565 −1.40 138.86
Papss1 ns 0.565 1.33 131.5
Papss1 ns 0.543 1.41 131.5
Slc39a8 ns 0.522 1.30 135.76
Nfkb1 ns 0.500 −1.17 135.52
Tspan5 ns 0.500 1.34 138.68
Nfkb1 ns 0.500 −1.22 135.52
Pla2g12a ns 0.478 1.41 129.87
Ube2d3 ns 0.478 −1.19 135.38
Casp6 ns 0.457 1.24 129.89
Papss1 ns 0.435 1.21 131.5
Mttp ns 0.435 2.34 138.02
H2afz ns 0.413 −1.08 137.8
EG668831 ns 0.413 −1.34 128.95
*

The GPR score indicates the fraction of normalizer genes against which a given gene was found to be significantly different; a threshold of at least 40% (score 0.4) was set to identify genes with significant change.21 ns = not significant

**

Fold change with respect to 10 best normalizers. Negative values indicate C3Bir upregulation, positive values B6 upregulation.

Genes were represented by up to three primer-sets for each gene. The positions of the genes on chromosome 3 are given in mega base pairs (Mbp).

DISCUSSION

The Cdcs1 locus is a major modifier of murine IBD and was originally identified in experimental crossings of Il10−/− mice. The C3Bir allele of Cdcs1 (that confers colitis susceptibility) codes genetic factors that impair innate immune responses of BMDM to TLR-ligands, but enhance adaptive CD4+ T-cell responses. Cdcs1 was originally positioned within a minimum 7 Mbp interval containing the NFκB p50 coding gene (Nfkb1).3 As C3Bir BMDM showed constitutively higher expression of this transcription factor and a diminished NFκB-response after TNF-stimulation, Nfkb1 appeared as an attractive candidate.3 However, further subcongenic analysis revealed that the effective congenic region was considerably larger,4 expanding the list of potential candidates markedly.

Breeding of additional congenic IL-10-deficient strains and backcrossing of all strains to N10 enabled us to refine the Cdcs1 interval in this study. By histological scoring of intestinal lesions, we observed the most informative phenotypes in mice less than 10 weeks old. In general, the C3Bir congenic interval mediated a more distinct colitogenic effect in mice of the B6 background compared to the protective effect of B6 alleles within the C3Bir background. This explains more concise phenotypes in BC-R than in CB-R congenic mice, likely due to additional modifiers in the remaining background, particularly the C3Bir inherited QTLs Cdcs2, 3, 7, 9, and 10.

Our analysis revealed that a congenic interval between 87.1 and 131.1 Mbp on Chr 3 modified IBD susceptibility and excluded Nfkb1 as major primary factor. Interestingly, also strains that were partially congenic in these intervals changed their susceptibility according to the inherited congenic alleles, indicating the presence of multiple contributing loci. The finding of a major QTL breaking up into several smaller loci has been shown in other experimental models.22 Fine mapping of selected congenic intervals allowed a further dissection of Cdcs1 and revealed three regions that likely contain genetic modifiers: Cdcs1.1 from 88.1 to 108.8 Mbp; Cdcs1.2 from 120.0 to 123.0 Mbp; and Cdcs1.3 from 125.6 to 128.0 Mbp. Positional candidate genes were identified in these regions by sequencing and included Fcgr1, Cnn3, Larp7, and Alpk1.

In microarray experiments on CBir1 flagellin stimulated or unstimulated BMDM of parental and congenic Il10−/− strains, we have observed that the genetic background explained most of the differential gene expression. Furthermore, the majority of genes were found to be down regulated in C3Bir BMDM, including a variety of genes involved in immune processes. This corroborates the concept of innate hyporesponsiveness in C3Bir leading to disturbed intestinal homeostasis. To identify potential genes underlying Cdcs1 linkage, we selected genes that were both affected in their expression by the congenic interval and located in the Cdcs1 region (indicating cis-regulation). Genes located within the defined candidate gene intervals included above mentioned Fcgr1 and Cnn3, as well as Ccdc109b.It has to be stated that although previous studies showed strain specific differences in innate immune response of macrophages especially after flagellin stimulation, other cell types and mechanisms likely play also a role in Cdcs1-mediated colitis susceptibility.

Further candidate gene analysis was performed using a high-throughput real-time RT-PCR strategy for genes within the Cdcs1 interval. For this analysis, BMDM of B6 and C3Bir wildtype mice were used instead of the Il10−/− strains as we expected to detect background effects on gene expression in cells without IL-10 mutation. Interestingly, Nfkb1 showed higher expression levels in C3Bir macrophages on the mRNA level, which corresponds to the mobility shift assays performed previously. Using a long congenic strain, it was also demonstrated that the strain specific Nfkb1 expression was determined by the haplotype of the transferred congenic element.3 It remains to be determined whether strain specific Nfkb1 expression is caused by cis-regulation or by a genetic/epigenetic factor located within the defined Cdcs1 interval, e.g. by a detailed analysis of Nfkb1 expression in long and short congenic strains. Of the remaining 17 genes that showed statistically significant expression differences in this GPR analysis, Ugt8a stood out with a 38.78 fold higher expression in B6 BMDM. This gene is located at most 0.5 Mbp proximal to Cdcs1.3, carries a coding non-synonymous SNP, and encodes a key enzyme for synthesis of glycosphingolipides that, besides being an integral part of myelin sheaths,23 are essential for formation of lymphoid-specific stromal niches in the bone marrow and therefore for lymphopoiesis.24 The real-time RT-PCR approach confirmed differential expression of Ccdc109b detected by microarray analysis. This gene is located just distal to Cdcs1.3. Expression analyses revealed high expression on the mRNA level in cells of the macrophage lineage (http://biogps.gnf.org);25 however, the function of the gene product is unknown.

Combining the results of all four candidate gene approaches reveals four attractive candidate genes: Fcgr1 (Cdcs1.1), Cnn3 (Cdcs1.2), Larp7 and Alpk1 (Cdcs1.3). The Fcgr1 gene encodes a high-affinity Fc-γ receptor (also known as CD64) that is constitutively expressed on monocytes and macrophages. This receptor plays a pivotal role in immune responses, including immune-complex mediated phagocytosis and antigen presentation to T cells. Interestingly, absence of functional Fc-γ receptor 1 leads to elevated antibody responses.26 Furthermore, signalling via this receptor was essential for flagellin induced Th1 IBD response in mice.27 The h3-isoform of calponin that is encoded by the Cnn3 gene is abundantly expressed in non-smooth muscle tissue.28 While the role of calponins in smooth muscle contractility is well known, its function in non-muscle cells is less well understood. Interestingly, the h2-isoform has recently been shown to modify the number of peripheral neutrophils and monocytes, the rate of proliferation and migration of macrophages as well as their phagocytotic activity.29 Larp7 encodes a negative regulator of RNA-polymerase II (Pol II) that catalyze transcription of DNA to synthesize precursors of mRNA, most snRNA and microRNA. Larp7 inhibits via stabilization of the 7SK ribonucleoprotein the positive transcription elongation factor (P-TEF)b that is recruited by NFκB and regulates a subset of NFκB dependent genes, those that are characterized by TNF-induced Pol II recruitment.30 Accordingly, reduction of LARP7 by RNA interference enhanced transcription from cellular Pol II promoters, including the acute phase protein HSP70.31 Therefore, Larp7 represents an attractive candidate that might play a role in innate hyporesponsiveness and Nfkb1 dysregulation in C3Bir mice. ALPK1 is essential for the transport of lipid rafts carrying vesicles from the Golgi-apparatus to the plasma membrane probably by phosphorylation of myosin Ia, a function that has been identified using polarized epithelial cell lines.32 However, taking into account that Alpk1 mRNA is ubiquitously expressed including in macrophages and other immune cells (http://biogps.gnf.org),25 and that lipid rafts play an important role in immune cells including TLR-signalling, TNF-release, antigen presenting, and phagocytosis in macrophages as well as B- and T-cell receptor signalling in lymphocytes, this gene might be of great importance for responses to bacterial stimuli and mucosal homeostasis.33,34 Homologs of Larp7 and Alpk1 are located within a human susceptibility region for IBD on Chr 4,35 that, however, has not been confirmed by current genome wide association studies.36

By analyzing 15 reciprocal congenic strains that were generated from Il10−/− mice of either C3Bir or B6 genetic backgrounds by 10 cycles of backcrossing, we have observed that a major colitis susceptibility locus in mice split up in at least three independent regions, demonstrating the complex structure of this QTL. Subcongenic analyses enabled us to define candidate gene intervals within the Cdcs1 region. Besides fine mapping of the defined congenic intervals, identification of candidate genes was achieved by sequencing, microarray analysis, and high-throughput real-time RT-PCR. Combining results of these analyses, we identified four attractive candidate genes that fit well into the concept that impaired mucosal barrier functions, processing of bacteria, and/or immunoregulation plays an important role in the etiology of IBD.

Supplementary Material

Supp Fig 1
Supp Tables

Acknowledgments

Funding: This work was supported by grants from the Broad Medical Research Program of the Eli and Edythe L. Broad Foundation (EHL), the National Institutes of Health (PPG-DK-44240; EHL), and Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes (AB/GB).

The authors gratefully acknowledge the excellent technical assistance of A. Smoczek, Pamela Stanley, and E. Wiebe.

LITERATURE

  • 1.Farmer MA, Sundberg JP, Bristol IJ, et al. A major quantitative trait locus on chromosome 3 controls colitis severity in IL-10-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:13820–13825. doi: 10.1073/pnas.241258698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mähler M, Most C, Schmidtke S, et al. Genetics of colitis susceptibility in IL-10-deficient mice: backcross versus F2 results contrasted by principal component analysis. Genomics. 2002;80:274–282. doi: 10.1006/geno.2002.6840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Beckwith J, Cong Y, Sundberg JP, et al. Cdcs1, a major colitogenic locus in mice, regulates innate and adaptive immune response to enteric bacterial antigens. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:1473–1484. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.07.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Beckwith J, Cong Y, Sundberg JP, et al. Correction. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:2620. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bleich A, Mähler M, Most C, et al. Refined histopathologic scoring system improves power to detect colitis QTL in mice. Mamm Genome. 2004;15:865–871. doi: 10.1007/s00335-004-2392-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Borm ME, He J, Kelsall B, et al. A major quantitative trait locus on mouse chromosome 3 is involved in disease susceptibility in different colitis models. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:74–85. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.10.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ziegler-Heitbrock HW, Petersmann I, Frankenberger M. p50 (NF-kappa B1) is upregulated in LPS tolerant P388D1 murine macrophages. Immunobiology. 1997;198:73–80. doi: 10.1016/s0171-2985(97)80028-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nenci A, Becker C, Wullaert A, et al. Epithelial NEMO links innate immunity to chronic intestinal inflammation. Nature. 2007;446:557–561. doi: 10.1038/nature05698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Garrett WS, Lord GM, Punit S, et al. Communicable ulcerative colitis induced by T-bet deficiency in the innate immune system. Cell. 2007;131:33–45. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Karban AS, Okazaki T, Panhuysen CI, et al. Functional annotation of a novel NFKB1 promoter polymorphism that increases risk for ulcerative colitis. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13:35–45. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddh008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Takedatsu H, Taylor KD, Mei L, et al. Linkage of Crohn’s disease-related serological phenotypes: NFKB1 haplotypes are associated with anti-CBir1 and ASCA, and show reduced NF-kappaB activation. Gut. 2009;58:60–67. doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.156422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.de Buhr MF, Mähler M, Geffers R, et al. Cd14, Gbp1, and Pla2g2a: three major candidate genes for experimental IBD identified by combining QTL and microarray analyses. Physiol Genomics. 2006;25:426–434. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00022.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kasuya E. Mann–Whitney U test when variances are unequal. Animal behaviour. 61:1247–1249. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mundry R, Fischer J. Use of statistical programs for nonparametric tests of small samples often leads to incorrect P values: examples from Animal Behaviour. Animal behaviour. 1998;56:256–259. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lodes MJ, Cong Y, Elson CO, et al. Bacterial flagellin is a dominant antigen in Crohn disease. J Clin Invest. 2004;113:1296–1306. doi: 10.1172/JCI20295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Irizarry RA, Bolstad BM, Collin F, et al. Summaries of Affymetrix GeneChip probe level data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:e15. doi: 10.1093/nar/gng015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gautier L, Cope L, Bolstad BM, et al. affy--analysis of Affymetrix GeneChip data at the probe level. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:307–315. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cui X, Hwang JT, Qiu J, et al. Improved statistical tests for differential gene expression by shrinking variance components estimates. Biostatistics. 2005;6:59–75. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxh018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Storey JD, Tibshirani R. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:9440–9445. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1530509100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sturn A, Quackenbush J, Trajanoski Z. Genesis: cluster analysis of microarray data. Bioinformatics. 2002;18:207–208. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.1.207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Akilesh S, Shaffer DJ, Roopenian D. Customized molecular phenotyping by quantitative gene expression and pattern recognition analysis. Genome Res. 2003;13:1719–1727. doi: 10.1101/gr.533003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Brenner M, Meng HC, Yarlett NC, et al. The non-MHC quantitative trait locus Cia5 contains three major arthritis genes that differentially regulate disease severity, pannus formation, and joint damage in collagen- and pristane-induced arthritis. J Immunol. 2005;174:7894–7903. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.12.7894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bosio A, Binczek E, Stoffel W. Molecular cloning and characterization of the mouse Cgt gene encoding UDP-galactose ceramide-galactosyltransferase (cerebroside synthetase) Genomics. 1996;35:223–226. doi: 10.1006/geno.1996.0342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Katayama Y, Frenette PS. Galactocerebrosides are required postnatally for stromal-dependent bone marrow lymphopoiesis. Immunity. 2003;18:789–800. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(03)00150-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Su AI, Wiltshire T, Batalov S, et al. A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:6062–6067. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400782101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Barnes N, Gavin AL, Tan PS, et al. FcgammaRI-deficient mice show multiple alterations to inflammatory and immune responses. Immunity. 2002;16:379–389. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(02)00287-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chen X, Feng BS, Zheng PY, et al. Fc gamma receptor signaling in mast cells links microbial stimulation to mucosal immune inflammation in the intestine. Am J Pathol. 2008;173:1647–1656. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.080487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Maguchi M, Nishida W, Kohara K, et al. Molecular cloning and gene mapping of human basic and acidic calponins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995;217:238–244. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1995.2769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Huang QQ, Hossain MM, Wu K, et al. Role of H2-calponin in regulating macrophage motility and phagocytosis. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:25887–25899. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M801163200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nowak DE, Tian B, Jamaluddin M, et al. RelA Ser276 phosphorylation is required for activation of a subset of NF-kappaB-dependent genes by recruiting cyclin-dependent kinase 9/cyclin T1 complexes. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28:3623–3638. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01152-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Markert A, Grimm M, Martinez J, et al. The La-related protein LARP7 is a component of the 7SK ribonucleoprotein and affects transcription of cellular and viral polymerase II genes. EMBO Rep. 2008;9:569–575. doi: 10.1038/embor.2008.72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Heine M, Cramm-Behrens CI, Ansari A, et al. Alpha-kinase 1, a new component in apical protein transport. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:25637–25643. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M502265200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kay JG, Murray RZ, Pagan JK, et al. Cytokine secretion via cholesterol-rich lipid raft-associated SNAREs at the phagocytic cup. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:11949–11954. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M600857200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Luo C, Wang K, Liu de Q, et al. The functional roles of lipid rafts in T cell activation, immune diseases and HIV infection and prevention. Cell Mol Immunol. 2008;5:1–7. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2008.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cho JH, Nicolae DL, Gold LH, et al. Identification of novel susceptibility loci for inflammatory bowel disease on chromosomes 1p, 3q, and 4q: evidence for epistasis between 1p and IBD1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:7502–7507. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.13.7502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cho JH. The genetics and immunopathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:458–466. doi: 10.1038/nri2340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp Fig 1
Supp Tables

RESOURCES