Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Aging. 2008 Aug 29;31(6):1059–1063. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.07.017

Apolipoprotein E ε4 influences on episodic recall and brain structures in aging pilots

Maheen M Adamson a,b,*, Kelly M Landy b, Susan Duong c,d, Sabrina Fox-Bosetti c,d, J Wesson Ashford a,b, Greer M Murphy b, Michael Weiner c,d, Joy L Taylor a,b
PMCID: PMC2858239  NIHMSID: NIHMS79678  PMID: 18760504

Abstract

The apolipoprotein (APOE) ε4 allele is associated with cognitive deficits and hippocampal atrophy in nondemented middle-aged and older adults. It is not known to what extent this genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD) impacts performance in late middle-aged and older workers in cognitively demanding occupations. This cross-sectional analysis examines brain–cognitive–genetic relationships in actively flying general aviation pilots, half of whom are APOE ε4 carriers. Fifty pilots were studied with structural MRI and memory tasks. Average visual paired associate memory recall performance was lower in APOE ε4 carriers than non-carriers. Memory performance correlated positively with hippocampal volume, but no structural differences were found in hippocampal or frontal volumes with respect to APOE ε4 allele. These results were evident in healthy professionals without any presenting memory problems and without selection for a family history of AD. These findings point to basic memory testing as a sensitive tool for detecting APOE ε4 -related influences on memory in aging workers.

Keywords: Episodic memory, Hippocampus, Frontal lobe, APOE ε4, Cognitive aging, Volumetric MRI, Dementia, Alzheimer's disease

1. Introduction

The apolipoprotein (APOE) ε4 allele is a major genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD; Corder et al., 1993), accelerating the age of symptom onset (Khachaturian et al., 2004). The APOE ε4 allele has frequently been examined as a correlate or predictor of cognitive impairment in nondemented populations to facilitate early detection of AD. However, the results reported in these studies are not only inconsistent (Small et al., 2004), little is known about the impact of APOE ε4 on middle-aged and older workers in cognitively demanding occupations. For instance, recent cross-sectional studies report lower performance during memory tasks in APOE ε4 carriers compared to non-carriers (mean age < 70 years) (Caselli et al., 2001; Chey et al., 2000; Flory et al., 2000; Levy et al., 2004; Lind et al., 2006), but several other studies do not (Jorm et al., 2007; Moffat et al., 2000; Nilsson et al., 2006; Romero et al., 2002; Sager et al., 2005). The impact of APOE ε4 on memory has been more consistent in longitudinal studies (Anstey and Christensen, 2000; Blair et al., 2005; Caselli et al., 2004; Kozauer et al., 2008; Reynolds et al., 2006; Tupler et al., 2006). A few cross-sectional MRI studies report smaller hippocampal volumes in APOE ε4 carriers than in non-carriers (mean age < 70 years) (den Heijer et al., 2002; Lind et al., 2006; Plassman et al., 1997; Tohgi et al., 1997) but many do not (Cohen et al., 2001; Lemaitre et al., 2005; Moffat et al., 2000; Reiman et al., 1998; Schmidt et al., 1996; Tupler et al., 2006). As in the case of memory performance, the impact of APOE ε4 on hippocampal volume in cognitively normal adults appears larger and more consistent in longitudinal studies (Cohen et al., 2001; Moffat et al., 2000).

Studies using the frontal lobe as an anatomical measure usually report its reduction with age (Raz et al., 2005) and/or its association with working memory/attention-demanding tasks (Gunning-Dixon and Raz, 2003). The ability to fly an airplane provides an ideal platform to study aging workers (Taylor et al., 2007), especially those at risk for AD, as this skill involves working memory and attentional networks (Taylor et al., 2005). Below, we report the baseline results from an ongoing longitudinal MRI study where actively flying, FAA medically certified pilots aged 50–76 years undergo structural MRIs and neuropsychological testing every 2 years.

2. Methods

2.1. Participants

A total of 50 general aviation pilots were selectively recruited (50% APOE ε3/4 or 4/4 and 50% ε3/3) from the ongoing longitudinal Stanford/VA aviation study (see Table 1 for participant characteristics and brief description of measures). Written informed consents were obtained from all participants.

Table 1.

Characteristics (mean ±S.D.) of the 50 participants

APOE ε4a carriers n = 24 APOE ε4 non-carriers n = 26
Age, year, mean ± S.D. 60.50 ± 6.8 (age range = 50–76) 61.39 ± 6.7 (age range = 51–74)
Education, year, mean ± S.D. 17.7 ± 2.8 17.0 ± 1.9
Number White, non-Hispanic 23 23
Number men 22 19
Number statin use ever 5 4
Number hypertension medication use ever 5 8
Number family history of dementia (yes/no/not sure) 8/15/1 4/19/3
Number FAA proficiency rating (VFR/IFR/CFII-ATP)b 7/10/7 6/13/7
Number FAA medical class I, II or IIIc 1/7/16 2/7/17
Total flight time, h, median ± S.D. 1656 ± 1199 2567 ± 2328
VPAd average recall (% correct)e** 70 ± 19.33 84.5 ± 16.47
VPA coding throughputf* 25.61 ± 5.19 28.7 ± 8.45
VPA coding accuracy rateg 99.23 ± 1.72 98.65 ± 1.54
Rey AVLTh compositei z-score −0.17 ± 0.93 0.16 ± 0.94
Total hippocampal/TIV volumej 0.00373 ± 0.00038 0.00376 ± 0.00034
Total frontal lobe/TIV volumek 0.344 ± 0.014 0.344 ± 0.017
*

p < 0.05;

**

p < 0.01.

a

APOE genotyping is based on genomic DNA extracted from frozen blood/buccal mucosa/saliva samples based on Murphy et al. (1997). All participants agreed to have the results of APOE genotyping withheld from them.

b

VFR: visual flight rules are a set of aviation regulations under which a pilot can operate the aircraft by visual reference to the environment outside the cockpit. IFR: instrument flight rules allow a pilot to fly in poorer visibility conditions using navigational instruments. CFII: certified flight instructor of pilots in training for IFR. ATP: certified to fly air-transport planes. The basic rating is VFR and the most advanced is ATP (see Taylor et al., 2007 for more detail).

c

Pilots are required to pass periodic medical examinations in order to fly. Class I is the most stringent and Class III is the least.

d

Visual paired associate (VPA) recall was assessed with the symbol digit coding (SDC) test available in CogScreen–AE (Kay, 1995), a computerized aviator assessment battery administered as part of the Stanford/VA aviation study's annual testing.

e

VPA average recall is the average of the immediate and delayed recall scores from the SDC task in Cogscreen AE.

f

VPA coding throughput is the number of correct responses per minute derived from the number of correct responses made during the 90-s trial of SDC.

g

VPA coding accuracy is the % of correct responses during the 90-s trial of SDC.

h

Verbal episodic memory was assessed with the Rey AVLT.

i

Composite score is the average of immediate and delayed z-scores.

j

Hippocampal volume for n = 47 participants; semi-automated volumetry (Hsu et al., 2002). No APOE ε4-related differences in left and right hippocampal volumes were found.

k

Frontal lobe volume for n = 45 participants; tissue segmentation and semi-automated lobar voluming method based on Van Leemput et al. (1999).

2.2. MR Image acquisition and analysis

MRI data were acquired with a 1.5-T (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI) scanner using the following sequences: (a) a T2-weighted spin-echo MRI, TR/TE1/TE2 = 5000/30/80 ms, 51 oblique axial 3 mm slices angulated parallel to the long axis of the hippocampus (1.00 mm × 1.00 mm in plane resolution); b) 3D spoiled GRASS MRI of entire brain, TR/TE=9/2 ms, 15° flip angle, perpendicular to the long axis of the hippocampi (1.00 mm × 1.00 mm in plane resolution, 1.5 mm coronal slices, no skip).

3. Results

3.1. Effects of APOE ε4 and age on episodic memory

There were no significant differences between ε4 carriers and non-carriers with regards to age and education, p's > 0.15. The visual paired associate (VPA) average recall score was significantly lower for APOE ε4 carriers (mean % correct = 70 ± 19.33) than non-carriers (mean % correct = 84.5 ± 16.47); F(1,49) = 8.80 p < 0.01, effect size (ES) = −0.42. No main effect of age or Age × APOE interaction was observed (F's < 1). The effect size decreased slightly from −0.42 to −0.37 when the two homozygous APOE ε4 carriers were removed and from −0.42 to −0.34 when women were removed. The APOE ε4 effect however remained significant (F(1,41) = 4.76, p < 0.05). In addition, VPA coding throughput (number of correct responses per minute) was lower among APOE ε4 carriers compared to non-carriers (p = 0.047, ES = −0.29) and showed a strong decline with age (p < 0.001, ES = −0.55) with no Age × APOE ε4 interaction. No effect of APOE ε4, age or interaction was seen on the Rey auditory verbal learning test (AVLT) composite z-score.

3.2. Effects of APOE ε4 and age on hippocampal and frontal lobe volume

As shown in Table 1, there were no significant differences between APOE ε4 groups in normalized hippocampal (F(1,46) = 0.28, p > 0.1) or frontal lobe volume (F < 1). There was no significant main effect of age on hippocampal volume (F(1,46) = 2.47, p > 0.10). There was a main effect of age on frontal lobe (F(1,44) = 8.44, p < 0.01). Age × APOE interactions were not significant. We note that hippocampal volume correlated with VPA average recall (r = 0.45) and Rey AVLT composite (r = 0.47) scores.

4. Discussion

APOE ε4 carriers had lower memory performance, as measured by a VPA task assessing both immediate and delayed recall. This APOE ε4-related difference remained significant after potential sampling biases (gender imbalance) and APOE ε4 homozygosity were addressed. VPA recall, which is seldom assessed after symbol-digit coding in neuropsychological testing, proved to be more useful than the Rey AVLT in detecting an APOE ε4 influence on episodic memory in this sample. VPA coding throughput was lower in ε4 carriers than non-carriers on average. VPA coding throughput is similar to the number completed score of the symbol-digit modalities test (SDMT), a paper-and-pencil analogue of VPA coding portion of the task. SDMT was recently shown to be one of the best predictors, along with 10-item delayed word recall, for progression from amnestic MCI to AD (Fleisher et al., 2007). Thus, symbol-digit coding tests including a recall component appear to be a promising means of rapidly assessing persons at increased risk for AD.

Analogous to Schmidt et al. (1996) we did not observe hippocampal volume differences between APOE ε4 carriers and non-carriers in our cross-sectional study, despite an APOE ε4 effect on memory recall. Normal older adults clearly have larger hippocampi on average than age-matched AD individuals (Kramer et al., 2005), but the structural changes within the hippocampi are not well understood in nondemented APOE ε4 carriers. As addressed in the introduction, only 4/10 cross-sectional studies reported a significant decrease in hippocampal volume in APOE ε4 carriers compared to non-carriers. In contrast, two longitudinal studies to date reported APOE ε4-related hippocampal atrophy (Cohen et al., 2001; Moffat et al., 2000).

Our cohort selection criteria targets healthy middle-aged and older individuals and is less likely to include memory impaired individuals usually found in cohorts of participants older than 75. Our cohort has an average education level of 17 years, and more years of education may reduce the degree of APOE ε4-related memory decline (Mayeux et al., 2001). Additionally, unlike studies where recruitment is based on a family history of AD (Caselli et al., 2004; Sager et al., 2005; Tupler et al., 2006) none of our participants were recruited on this basis. Finally, as our participants are actively flying pilots, they employ visuo-spatial attention and navigation techniques in familiar and unfamiliar environments. Several human studies show that frontal and medial temporal lobe are involved in spatial attention and navigation (Maguire et al., 2006). Interestingly, an APOE ε4-related difference was observed in a visuo-spatial processing test which requires scanning, sequencing and learning strategies—cognitive skills pilots routinely use in flying. Our results suggest that healthy and actively flying middle-aged to older pilots who are genetically at risk for AD may be vulnerable to an earlier decline in episodic recall of items requiring visuo-spatial attention during learning. These changes are not yet evident in the hippocampus or frontal lobes (as quantified by MRI). Future studies combining genetic information, innovative memory testing, and various imaging techniques are more likely to capture alterations in cognitive performance of at-risk professional individuals.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by NIA grant R01 AG021632 (with a Diversity Supplement to Dr. Adamson), NIH P30 AG 17824 and NIH R37 AG 12713 and the Sierra-Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC) and the Medical Research Service of the Department of Veterans Affairs. We thank Helena Kraemer, PhD, Art Noda, M.S. & Xu Xiangyan, MD, MS for biostatistics consulting, MRI technologists Carla Basch & Patricia Spezia, Viktoriya Samarina for manuscript editing, Scott D. Huckaby for testing participants and Jerome A. Yesavage, MD for participant referrals. We also express appreciation to the aviator study participants for their time and interest in pursuit of answering intellectual questions.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest: There are no actual or potential conflicts of interest. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH/NIA.

References

  1. Anstey K, Christensen H. Education, activity, health, blood pressure and Apolipoprotein ε as predictors of cognitive change in old age: a review. Gerontology. 2000;46(3):163–177. doi: 10.1159/000022153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blair CK, Folsom AR, Knopman DS, Bray MS, Mosley TH, Boerwinkle E. APOE genotype and cognitive decline in a middle-aged cohort. Neurology. 2005;64(2):268–276. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000149643.91367.8A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Caselli RJ, Osborne D, Reiman EM, Hentz JG, Barbieri CJ, Saunders AM, Hardy J, Graff-Radford NR, Hall GR, Alexander GE. Preclinical cognitive decline in late middle-aged asymptomatic Apolipoprotein ε-e4/4 homozygotes: a replication study. J Neurol Sci. 2001;189(1/2):93–98. doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(01)00577-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Caselli RJ, Reiman EM, Osborne D, Hentz JG, Baxter LC, Hernandez JL, Alexander GG. Longitudinal changes in cognition and behavior in asymptomatic carriers of the APOE e4 allele. Neurology. 2004;62(11):1990–1995. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000129533.26544.bf. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chey J, Kim JW, Cho HY. Effects of Apolipoprotein ε phenotypes on the neuropsychological functions of community-dwelling elderly individuals without dementia. Neurosci Lett. 2000;289(3):230–234. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(00)01288-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cohen RM, Small C, Lalonde F, Friz J, Sunderland T. Effect of Apolipoprotein ε genotype on hippocampal volume loss in aging healthy women. Neurology. 2001;57(12):2223–2228. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.12.2223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Corder EH, Saunders AM, Strittmatter WJ, Schmechel DE, Gaskell PC, Small GW, Roses AD, Haines JL, Pericak-Vance MA. Gene dose of Apolipoprotein ε type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer's disease in late onset families. Science. 1993;261(5123):921–923. doi: 10.1126/science.8346443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. den Heijer T, Oudkerk M, Launer LJ, van Duijn CM, Hofman A, Breteler MM. Hippocampal, amygdalar, and global brain atrophy in different Apolipoprotein ε genotypes. Neurology. 2002;59(5):746–748. doi: 10.1212/wnl.59.5.746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fleisher AS, Sowell BB, Taylor C, Gamst AC, Petersen RC, Thal LJ. Clinical predictors of progression to Alzheimer disease in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Neurology. 2007;68(19):1588–1595. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000258542.58725.4c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Flory JD, Manuck SB, Ferrell RE, Ryan CM, Muldoon MF. Memory performance and the Apolipoprotein ε polymorphism in a community sample of middle-aged adults. Am J Med Genet. 2000;96(6):707–711. doi: 10.1002/1096-8628(20001204)96:6<707::aid-ajmg1>3.0.co;2-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gunning-Dixon FM, Raz N. Neuroanatomical correlates of selected executive functions in middle-aged and older adults: a prospective MRI study. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(14):1929–1941. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(03)00129-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hsu YY, Schuff N, Du AT, Mark K, Zhu X, Hardin D, Weiner MW. Comparison of automated and manual MRI volumetry of hippocampus in normal aging and dementia. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;16(3):305–310. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jorm AF, Mather KA, Butterworth P, Anstey KJ, Christensen H, Easteal S. APOE genotype and cognitive functioning in a large age-stratified population sample. Neuropsychology. 2007;21(1):1–8. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.21.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kay G. Cogscreen Aeromedical Edition Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.; Odessa, FL: 1995. [Google Scholar]
  15. Khachaturian AS, Corcoran CD, Mayer LS, Zandi PP, Breitner JC. Apolipoprotein ε epsilon4 count affects age at onset of Alzheimer disease, but not lifetime susceptibility: the cache county study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004;61(5):518–524. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.5.518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kozauer NA, Mielke MM, Chan GK, Rebok GW, Lyketsos CG. Apolipoprotein ε genotype and lifetime cognitive decline. Int Psychogeriatr. 2008;20(1):109–123. doi: 10.1017/S104161020700587X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kramer JH, Rosen HJ, Du AT, Schuff N, Hollnagel C, Weiner MW, Miller BL, Delis DC. Dissociations in hippocampal and frontal contributions to episodic memory performance. Neuropsychology. 2005;19(6):799–805. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.19.6.799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lemaitre H, Crivello F, Dufouil C, Grassiot B, Tzourio C, Alperovitch A, Mazoyer B. No epsilon4 gene dose effect on hippocampal atrophy in a large MRI database of healthy elderly subjects. Neuroimage. 2005;24(4):1205–1213. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Levy JA, Bergeson J, Putnam K, Rosen V, Cohen R, Lalonde F, Mirza N, Linker G, Sunderland T. Context-specific memory and Apolipoprotein ε (APOE) epsilon 4: cognitive evidence from the NIMH prospective study of risk for Alzheimer's disease. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004;10(3):362–370. doi: 10.1017/S1355617704103044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lind J, Larsson A, Persson J, Ingvar M, Nilsson LG, Backman L, Adolfsson R, Cruts M, Sleegers K, Van Broeckhoven C, Nyberg L. Reduced hippocampal volume in non-demented carriers of the Apolipoprotein ε epsilon4: relation to chronological age and recognition memory. Neurosci Lett. 2006;396(1):23–27. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.11.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Maguire EA, Woollett K, Spiers HJ. London taxi drivers and bus drivers: a structural MRI and neuropsychological analysis. Hippocampus. 2006;16(12):1091–1101. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mayeux R, Small SA, Tang M, Tycko B, Stern Y. Memory performance in healthy elderly without Alzheimer's disease: effects of time and Apolipoprotein-ε. Neurobiol Aging. 2001;22(4):683–689. doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(01)00223-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Moffat SD, Szekely CA, Zonderman AB, Kabani NJ, Resnick SM. Longitudinal change in hippocampal volume as a function of Apolipoprotein ε genotype. Neurology. 2000;55(1):134–136. doi: 10.1212/wnl.55.1.134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Murphy GM, Jr, Taylor J, Kraemer HC, Yesavage J, Tinklenberg JR. No association between Apolipoprotein ε epsilon 4 allele and rate of decline in Alzheimer's disease. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154(5):603–608. doi: 10.1176/ajp.154.5.603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nilsson LG, Adolfsson R, Backman L, Cruts M, Nyberg L, Small BJ, Van Broeckoven C. The influence of APOE status on episodic and semantic memory: data from a population-based study. Neuropsychology. 2006;20(6):645–657. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.20.6.645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Plassman BL, Welsh-Bohmer KA, Bigler ED, Johnson SC, Anderson CV, Helms MJ, Saunders AM, Breitner JC. Apolipoprotein ε epsilon 4 allele and hippocampal volume in twins with normal cognition. Neurology. 1997;48(4):985–989. doi: 10.1212/wnl.48.4.985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Raz N, Lindenberger U, Rodrigue KM, Kennedy KM, Head D, Williamson A, Dahle C, Gerstorf D, Acker JD. Regional brain changes in aging healthy adults: general trends, individual differences and modifiers. Cereb Cortex. 2005;15(11):1676–1689. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhi044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Reiman EM, Uecker A, Caselli RJ, Lewis S, Bandy D, de Leon MJ, De Santi S, Convit A, Osborne D, Weaver A, Thibodeau SN. Hippocampal volumes in cognitively normal persons at genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease. Ann Neurol. 1998;44(2):288–291. doi: 10.1002/ana.410440226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Reynolds CA, Prince JA, Feuk L, Brookes AJ, Gatz M, Pedersen NL. Longitudinal memory performance during normal aging: twin association models of APOE and other Alzheimer candidate genes. Behav Genet. 2006;36(2):185–194. doi: 10.1007/s10519-005-9027-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Romero LJ, Schuyler M, Kamboh MI, Qualls C, LaRue A, Liang HC, Rhyne R. The apo e4 allele and cognition in new Mexico hispanic elderly. Ethn Dis. 2002;12(2):235–241. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sager MA, Hermann B, La Rue A. Middle-aged children of persons with Alzheimer's disease: APOE genotypes and cognitive function in the Wisconsin registry for Alzheimer's prevention. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2005;18(4):245–249. doi: 10.1177/0891988705281882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Schmidt H, Schmidt R, Fazekas F, Semmler J, Kapeller P, Reinhart B, Kostner GM. Apolipoprotein ε e4 allele in the normal elderly: neuropsychologic and brain MRI correlates. Clin Genet. 1996;50(5):293–299. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1996.tb02377.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Small BJ, Rosnick CB, Fratiglioni L, Backman L. Apolipoprotein ε and cognitive performance: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aging. 2004;19(4):592–600. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.19.4.592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Taylor JL, Kennedy Q, Noda A, Yesavage JA. Pilot age and expertise predict flight simulator performance: a 3-year longitudinal study. Neurology. 2007;68(9):648–654. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000255943.10045.c0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Taylor JL, O'Hara R, Mumenthaler MS, Rosen AC, Yesavage JA. Cognitive ability, expertise, and age differences in following air-traffic control instructions. Psychol Aging. 2005;20(1):117–133. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.20.1.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Tohgi H, Takahashi S, Kato E, Homma A, Niina R, Sasaki K, Yonezawa H, Sasaki M. Reduced size of right hippocampus in 39- to 80-year-old normal subjects carrying the Apolipoprotein ε epsilon4 allele. Neurosci Lett. 1997;236(1):21–24. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(97)00743-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tupler LA, Krishnan KR, Greenberg DL, Marcovina SM, Payne ME, Macfall JR, Charles HC, Doraiswamy PM. Predicting memory decline in normal elderly: genetics, MRI, and cognitive reserve. Neurobiol Aging. 2006;28(11):1644–1656. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Van Leemput K, Maes F, Vandermeulen D, Suetens P. Automated model-based bias field correction of mr images of the brain. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1999;18(10):885–896. doi: 10.1109/42.811268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES