Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Tetrahedron Lett. 2010 May 1;51(18):2539–2540. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2010.03.008

Acyl radical insertion for the direct formation of new 7-substituted pterin analogs

Jeff M Pruet 1, Jon D Robertus 1, Eric V Anslyn 1,*
PMCID: PMC2860152  NIHMSID: NIHMS191063  PMID: 20436939

Abstract

A variety of pterin molecules were synthesized via an under-utilized acyl radical insertion, using aldehydes and α-keto esters as the acyl source. These reactions gave complete regiospecificity for the 7-isomer, with reaction times ranging in minutes, often with instantaneous product precipitation. This approach led to the construction of new pterin analogs unaccessable via traditional Friedel-Crafts acylation. The compounds were characterized by NMR spectroscopy and high-resolution mass spectroscopy.


Pterins have been shown to be a noteworthy lead in the search for Ricin A chain inhibitors.1 In this context, we have explored different routes to pterin libraries, particularly those which remove extraneous steps often needed to circumvent pterins’ insolubility and poor reactivity. As with other diazoaromatic compounds, such as pyrazines, direct substitution by electrophiles is not a viable reaction for pterins, as a result of their being so π-electron deficient.2,3 For this reason, formation of acylpterins is typically done through oxidation of alkyl side-chains to carboxylates or alcohols.4,5 Taylor developed a method for forming isomerically-pure alkyl pterins, though it requires a multi-step construction of the ring.6 Methods exist for the formation of isomerically-enriched alkyl pterins through a traditional one step condensation, but formation of the undesirable isomer is still observed.5 Furthermore, due to the poor solubility of pterins, isolation of the desired isomer can be difficult, often requiring further modifications.5,7

Direct acylation of heteroaromatic bases was first shown by Caronna, whereby an aldehyde is allowed to react with a peroxide in the presence of iron sulfate, generating an acyl radical which can insert onto the protonated heterocyclic species.8 This reaction has been performed on a variety of simple heterocycles, and has also been shown to proceed with α-keto esters as the acyl source.2,9,10 Substituent-directing effects have been studied, and it was found that groups which are electron withdrawing by resonance and inductive effects direct to the para position.11 As related to pterins, these directing effects would regiospecifically provide the 7-isomer. This reaction has previously been utilized on molecules containing the general pteridine substructure, and it was indeed found that when both heteroaromatic positions are available, only the 7-isomer is formed, while placement of electron-donating substituents on the 7-position allowed access to the 6-isomer.1214 However, these pteridine analogs often had several preemptive modifications and all required post-reaction substituent conversion to arrive at the pterin.1214 It thus follows that the overall yield of the desired pterins would suffer by these additional steps.

We report here the use of peroxide and iron sulfate for the direct one-step formation of a variety of pterins, starting simply from pterin (1). As shown, aldehydes gave rise to acylpterins (2–5), and α-keto esters gave rise to pterin esters (6–7).

The general procedure for the reaction depicted in Scheme 1 involves suspending pterin (1) in 50–60mL water, and adding 5–6mL concentrated sulfuric acid along with 2 eq iron sulfate. Separately, 5 eq of the aldehyde and 2 eq tbutylperoxide were mixed together, with cooling, and then added dropwise to the reaction. In the cases where esters or amides inserted onto the pterin, the product precipitated out instantaneously. In instances where precipitation was not observed, addition of a small amount of ammonium hydroxide afforded the desired product as a precipitate. The results are summarized in Table 1. The moderate yields are consistent with results seen previously for unsubstitued pteridines, and the lower yield seen with anisaldehyde is attributed to poor solubility in water.12 Longer reaction times did not yield higher product conversion.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Acyl radical addition to pterin

Table 1.

Entry Acyl source time (min) Product % Yield
2 Acetaldehyde 10 R = CH3 42
3 Propionaldehyde 10 R = CH2CH3 37
4 Formamide 3 R = NH2 31
5 Anisaldehyde 10 R = C6H4OCH3 22
6 Methyl Pyruvate 2 R = OCH3 48
7 Ethyl Pyruvate 3 R = OCH2CH3 39

In summary, we have used an acyl radical reaction for the fast, direct and regiospecific construction of a number of pterin compounds, recoverable by simple filtration. Using this reaction directly on pterin removes the need for substituent conversions, which would affect the overall yield.

Supplementary Material

01

Acknowledgments

Funding for this research is provided by the National Institute of Health (NIH) (Grant No. U01A1075509-030).

Footnotes

Supplementary Material

Supplementary data (general experimental procedure, NMR and MS data) can be found in the online version.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Yan X, Hollis T, Svinth M, Day P, Monzingo AF, Milne GWA, Robertus JD. Journal of Molecular Biology. 1997;266:1043. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Houminer Y, Southwick EW, Williams DL. Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry. 1986;23:497. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hurst DT. In: Science of Synthesis. Houben-Weyl, editor. E9. Wiley; p. 299. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pfleiderer W, Zondler H, Mengel R. Justus Liebigs Annalen der Chemie. 1970;741:64. doi: 10.1002/jlac.19707420103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Waring P, Armarego WLF. Aust J Chem. 1985;38:629. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Taylor EC, Perlman KL, Sword IP, Sequin-Frey M, Jacobi PA. J Amer Chem Soc. 1973;95:6407. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Taylor EC, Otiv SR, Durucasu I. Heterocycles. 1993;36:1883. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Caronna T, Gardini GP, Minisci F. Chemical Communications (London) 1969:201. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Caronna T, Fronza G, Minisci F, Porta O. Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 2: Physical Organic Chemistry (1972–1999) 1972:2035. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Heinisch G, Loetsch G. Tetrahedron. 1986;42:5973. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Houminer Y, Southwick EW, Williams DL. Journal of Organic Chemistry. 1989;54:640. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Baur R, Kleiner E, Pfleiderer W. Liebigs Annalen der Chemie. 1984:1798. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Baur R, Sugimoto T, Pfleiderer W. Helvetica Chimica Acta. 1988;71:531. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Doering T, Boruah RC, Pfleiderer W. Pteridines. 2004;15:129. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

RESOURCES