Skip to main content
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene logoLink to The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
. 2010 May;82(5):871–874. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0639

Echinococcus canadensis G7 (Pig Strain): An Underestimated Cause of Cystic Echinococcosis in Austria

Renate Schneider 1, Bernd Gollackner 1, Martin Schindl 1, Gerhard Tucek 1, Herbert Auer 1,*
PMCID: PMC2861383  PMID: 20439969

Abstract

Anamnesis data of 104 patients with Cystic Echinococcosis were correlated retrospectively with the detected species/strain of Echinococcus. Ninety-two percent (N = 23) of autochthonous Austrian and 33% (N = 9) of patients with former Yugoslavian (YU) origin were infected with E. canadensis G7, the pig strain. All patients originating from Turkey harbored E. granulosus G1, the sheep strain. All E. canadensis G7-infected patients showed small liver cysts (ø 5.9 cm), only one of them an additional lung cyst. The median age at the time of operation of the Austrian patients was 55 years, of the Turkish patients 30 years, and of the former YU patients 23 years in the E. canadensis and 42 years in the E. granulosus-infected patients, respectively. The unexpected high number of E. canadensis G7-infected patients and the immigrants' young age show the importance of E. canadensis as a cause of human Cystic Echinococcosis in Central Europe and accordingly this new species has to be included into future echinococcosis control programs.

Introduction

Cystic echinococcosis (CE), caused by the metacestode stage of Echinococcus granulosus (sensu lato) belongs to the most serious helminthozoonoses and is considered an emerging disease throughout the world.1 Dogs are the definitive host, livestock the intermediate, and humans the aberrant intermediate host. Although the incidence in Austria is rather low, 0.4 human cases are diagnosed per 100,000 inhabitants every year,2 decreasing numbers of autochthonous human cases face rising numbers of imported cases.3 After some years of controversial discussion about the taxonomic classification, the 10 strains (G1–G10) of the former species E. granulosus have recently been split into four species of different pathogenicity to humans;4,5 Echinococcus granulosus (G1–G3), Echinococcus equinus (G4), Echinococcus ortleppi (G5), and Echinococcus canadensis (G6–G10).

In a previous study, we identified E. canadensis G7 as the major causative agent of human CE in the autochthonous Austrian population.6 However, little is known about the clinical presentation of CE in humans caused by E. canadensis G7 (“pig strain”). Therefore, we evaluated molecular biological, clinical, and anamnesis data of 104 CE patients operated on in Austrian hospitals between 1978 and 2008. Twenty-four percent of the patients were of Austrian origin, 35% of Turkish, 26% originated from the former Yugoslavia (YU), and 15% from various other regions. Because the majority of Austrian immigrants originated from Turkey and the former YU, we focused our interest on those geographical regions on one hand and on the Austrian patients on the other.

Material and Methods

Patients.

In 66% (N = 69) of the 104 CE patients only formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues (FFPT) were available for molecular biological studies (kindly provided by Prof. Friedrich Wrba, Medical University Vienna), in 34% (N = 35) fresh, frozen, or 70% ethanol preserved cyst material was used for strain/species determination.

Details on cyst localization, sex, age range, country of origin, and results of the molecular biological studies of all 104 patients were logged into an Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft, Redman, WA) and analyzed (Table 1). Although the documentation of clinical symptoms, cyst diameter, and number of cysts per patient was incomplete, we analyzed the available data in the same way in relation to the results of the molecular biological study (Table 1). Because the international classification of ultrasound images in cystic echinococcosis, as proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO), is not yet established in Austrian hospitals, we could not include these data.7

Table 1.

Personal, epidemiological, and clinical data of patients suffering from E. canadensis G7, E. granulosus, or E. canadensis G6 infection

Species/strain Species/strain Species/strain
E. canadensis G7 E. granulosus E. canadensis G6
Number of patients 33 68 3
Sex (female:male) 20:13 36:32 2:1
Mean age 45.8 (5–72)years 39.6 (8–76) years 39.0 (29–48) years
Origin Austria (23) Turkey (36) Iran (1)
Former YU* (9) Former YU (18) Afghanistan (1)
Hungary (1) Romania (3) Ghana (1)
Austria (2)
Albania (1)
Greece (1)
Italy (1)
Chile (1)
Lebanon (1)
Tunisia (1)
India (1)
Thailand (1)
Bulgaria (1)
Organ Liver (32) Liver (55) Liver (1)
Liver and lung (1) Liver and lung (2) Lung (1)
Lung (3) Spleen (1)
Musculature (3)
Diaphragm (2)
Kidney (1)
Pericardium (1)
Heart and brain (1)
Average cyst diameter (N = 71) 5.7 cm (N = 23) 10.7 cm (N = 46) 5 cm (N = 2)
Minimal–maximal cyst diameter 3–10 cm 5–21 cm 5 cm
Single cyst 18 33 2
More than 1 cyst 5 13
Calcified cyst 4 6
Clinical symptoms (N = 68) Upper abdominal pain (10) Upper abdominal pain (18)
Asymptomatic (4) Asymptomatic (2)
Suspected tumor (7) Suspected tumor (2)
Biliary symptoms (2) Biliary symptoms (3)
Fever (1), nausea (1) Relapse (4)
Accident (1), anaphylactic shock (1) Fever (3)
Hemoptysis (2)
Nausea (1), pregnancy (1)
Ascites (1), renal colic (1)
Thrombosis (1), stenocardia (1)
Echinococcosis in the family (1)
*

YU = former Yugoslavia.

DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction.

For DNA extraction from fresh, frozen, or ethanol preserved specimens, we chose a commercially available DNA extraction kit (Master Pure DNA Purification kit; Epicentre, Madison, WI) and followed the manufacturer's tissue protocol. The extraction procedure for FFPT was described previously.6

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with the primer pairs SH172F/SH467R and SW163F/SW367R was performed as described previously for all FFPT samples6 and modified for the fresh, frozen, and ethanol preserved cyst material in the following way. The 25 µL reaction mixture consisted of 1× Thermophilic DNA Polymerase Reaction Buffer (Promega, Madison, WI), 0.01% BSA (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), 200 µM dATP, 200 µM dGTP, 200 µM dCTP (Promega), 400 µM dUTP (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 µM of each primer (MWG Biotech, AG, Germany), 0.25 U UNG (Applied Biosystems), 1.5 U aTaq DNA Polymerase (Promega), and 2.5 µL of sample DNA.

The PCR was performed in a PTC-200 gradient thermocycler (MJ Research Inc., Waltham, MA) with an initial denaturation step of 95°C for 10 minutes, followed by 40 cycles 95°C for 30 s, 57°C (shPCR) and 58°C (swPCR) for 45 s and 72°C for 60 s. The PCR was terminated with a final extension step at 72°C for 7 minutes. After amplification 10 μL of the amplification products were resolved on a 1.5% ethidium bromide stained agarose gel and the amplified DNA fragments of specific sizes were visualized by UV fluorescence. Their sizes were verified by a standard DNA ladder (Bio-RAD, Hercules, CA) run simultaneously. The target sequences for the PCRs were located on a 471-bp segment of the mitochondrial ND1 gene,8 and the sizes of the PCR products were 295 bp for E. granulosus and 204 bp for E. canadensis G6/7. Control DNA from the reference strain and negative control were included in each reaction. Because the sequences of E. canadensis strain G6 and G7 are very similar, PCR product sequencing was necessary to discriminate between the closely related strains.6

Results

Geographical distribution, sex, and age range.

The majority of our patients were infected with E. granulosus (65%, N = 68), 32% (N = 33) with E. canadensis G7, and 3% (N = 3) with E. canadensis G6. From the 68 E. granulosus-infected patients, PCR product sequencing was performed from 44 (65%) and all of them turned out to belong to E. granulosus strain G1. The patients' age range was 5–76 (average 42) years, 56% were women and 44% men. The patients infected with E. canadensis G7 derived from Austria, the former YU (Serbia and Macedonia), and Hungary, those infected with E. granulosus from Turkey, the former YU (Bosnia, Serbia, Kosovo, Macedonia), Romania, Austria, and various other countries (Table 1). The patients who harbored the camel strain G6 were immigrants from Iran, Afghanistan, and Ghana, respectively.

Age range of patients of Austrian, former YU, and Turkish origin in correlation with the detected strain.

Statistical analysis (student's t test) of the patients' age at the time of operation showed that Austrian patients (N = 25) were significantly older than patients deriving from the former YU (N = 27, P < 0.005) and Turkey (N = 36, P < 0.0001), the median age of the Austrian patients was 55 (26–72) years, the former YU patients 39 (5–76) years, and the Turkish 30 (8–72) years (Table 2).

Table 2.

Echinococcus species/strain distribution and age range of patients from Austria, former Yugoslavia (YU), and Turkey

Austrian origin (N = 25) Former YU origin (N = 27) Turkish origin (N = 36)
E. granulosus 2 18 36
E. canadensis G7 23 9 0
Mean age 53 years 40 years 36 years
Median age 55 years 39 years 30 years
Age range 26–72 years 5–76 years 8–72 years

All patients of Turkish origin were infected with E. granulosus and all Austrian patients except two harbored the “pig strain” E. canadensis G7. From the patients deriving from the former YU, the median age of the E. canadensis G7-infected patients (N = 9) was 23 years, whereas the E. granulosus-infected patients' (N = 18) median age was 42 years.

Organ manifestation.

Fifty-five out of the 68 E. granulosus-infected patients suffered from liver cysts, two from liver and lung cysts, five patients showed lung cysts, other localizations were musculature, diaphragm, kidney, pericardium, and one patient harbored heart and brain cysts.

All 33 E. canadensis strain G7-infected patients harbored liver cysts; one of them (a 5-year-old boy from the former YU) additionally showed a lung cyst. The three E. canadensis G6-infected patients showed different organ localizations, the liver, lung, and spleen, respectively.

Cyst diameter.

The average cyst diameter of 46 E. granulosus-infected patients was 10.7 (5–21) cm, 13 harbored more than one cyst, and in 6 patients the cysts were (at least partly) calcified.

From 23 E. canadensis strain G7-infected patients the average cyst diameter was 5.9 (3–10) cm, five harbored more than one cyst, and 4 cysts were calcified. In two of the E. canadensis G6-infected patients the maximum cyst diameter was 5 cm.

Clinical signs.

Upper abdominal pain was the leading initial symptom (N = 18) in the E. granulosus-infected patients, followed by symptoms deriving from the biliary system (N = 3), fever and a wide range of symptoms reflecting the various organ manifestations (Table 1).

The main initial signs in the E. canadensis G7-infected group were upper abdominal pain (N = 10), seven were suspected of having a tumor, four patients were asymptomatic, two showed symptoms deriving from the biliary tract, one had fever, one nausea, one an anaphylactic shock, and one 5-year-old boy had a traffic accident. Information about the clinical symptoms of the E. canadensis G6-infected patients was not available.

Discussion

The aim of this study was to evaluate the importance of E. canadensis G7 (“pig strain”) as a causative agent of human CE in Austria for the first time. Accordingly, we analyzed clinical and anamnesis data of 104 CE patients operated on in Austrian hospitals between 1978 and 2008 and correlated them with the detected species/strain of Echinococcus. Because the majority of Austrian immigrants originated from Turkey and the former YU, we focused our interest on those geographical regions and the autochthonous population.

The role of the pig strain G7 as a causative agent of human CE was underestimated until recently,6,9,10 one possible reason is that small liver cysts might be symptomless for decades or probably for ever.11 Our data confirmed this estimation, showing that the diagnosis of CE patients harboring the pig strain occurred more often incidentally (14.8%, N = 27) than in patients infected with the sheep strain (4.9%, N = 41, Table 1). Furthermore, another possible reason for the underestimation of the pig strain as a causative agent of human CE in Europe might be the small number of samples that have been examined genetically so far,4 and that infection of pigs with the sheep strain occurred frequently.1214

From the samples of CE patients of Austrian origin (N = 25), all except two belonged to E. canadensis G7, the pig strain (Table 1). Regarding the two E. granulosus G1-infected patients of Austrian origin, our attempts to obtained travel anamnesis data were successful. Both male patients were residents of Vienna, one of them, a 58 years old dentist, reported several travels as an individual tourist, for example to Syria, Tunisia, and other Mediterranean countries and we presume that he acquired his infection with E. granulosus G1 there. The other patient, a 34-year-old clerk, reported a few short vacations in Italy; additionally, he had spent parts of his adolescence on a farm with intensive animal contact (dogs, cats, pigs, cattle) in Styria only a few kilometers distant from the Austrian border to Slovenia. A recent Slovenian study reported a relatively high prevalence of human CE in eastern Slovenia, but unfortunately it comprised no molecular discrimination of Echinococcus species/strains.15 In a previous study, we have identified cyst fluid from a pig from Styria as E. granulosus G114 and accordingly we presume that this case represents an autochthonous human infection with E. granulosus G1.

Although the follow-up of our patients was not the topic of this study, we decided to mention a 24-year-old man of Romanian origin suffering from E. granulosus G1 heart and brain cysts, who died after years of treatment as a consequence of inoperable CE cysts of the brain. This case shows very well that CE not only causes severe disease in humans and livestock-associated production losses in relatively poor countries,1,16,17 but also possible death, even in countries with an excellent health system like Austria.18

In general, a younger age at the time of diagnosis is correlated with an increased exposure to E. granulosus,19,20 which seems to be an explanation for the younger median age of the Turkish (30 years) and the former YU originated patients (39 years). In contrast, the significantly higher median age of Austrian patients (55 years) may reflect the good hygiene conditions, veterinary control systems, and essential improvements in farming conditions over the last decades in Austria. In the former YU the war and the collapse of the state Yugoslavia (1991–1999) might have worsened veterinary controls and hygiene conditions and influenced the epidemiological situation similar to reports from Bulgaria19 and newly independent central Asian states after the collapse of the Soviet Union.20,21 These changes might explain the relatively young median age of the pig strain-infected patients in the former YU but not the divergent age distribution between E. canadensis G7 (median age 23 years) and E. granulosus (median age 42 years) in the same geographical region.

Although the relatively high mean age (45.8 years) of the entire pig strain-infected patients from different geographical regions seems to be reasonable considering the described cyst localization and diameter and the resultant development of less severe clinical signs, the young age of the E. canadensis G7-infected patients from the former YU (N = 9) was unexpected and needs further investigation and interpretation. It needs further molecular biological studies comprising Echinococcus species/strain differentiation6,8,14,22 including more samples of human and pig origin with accurate geographical anamnesis to clarify the epidemiological situation in the former YU.

Because of the long incubation period in the human host, copro-diagnosis in the dog definitive host with differentiation between G1/2 and G5/6/7, as described by Naidich and others,23 and molecular biological investigation of the intermediate host including pigs might open new opportunities for the study of transmission routes, especially in regions where different “strains” respectively species of Echinococcus cause human CE.

Several groups of researchers assume that the extensive variation in the former species E. granulosus may influence life-cycle patterns, host specificity, antigenicity, transmission dynamics, sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents, and pathology and might therefore have implications for CE control programs and the development of vaccines.2426 At the time the recombinant EG95 vaccine was designed,27 the sheep strain of E. granulosus was presumed to be the primary cause of CE in humans and livestock. A recent publication dealt with the problem of the unproved effectiveness of the current EG95 vaccine against E. canadensis G6/7.26 Hence, the molecular discrimination of the species of Echinococcus and probably also of the strain are major prerequisites for effective control programs.25,26 Accordingly, the results of our study show an unexpected high prevalence of E. canadensis G7 in Central Europe. The widespread practice of home slaughtering of pigs and the presence of free-roaming domestic dogs in parts of the former YU (e.g., Serbia, Macedonia) until now, and mainly in Austria in the past, are the major prerequisites for the perpetuation of the lifecycle of E. canadensis G7. We presume that the dog–pig cycle exists in several other Central European regions where home slaughtering of pigs is customary and hygiene conditions are improvable.

To date, our study seems to be the first one that deals with the different clinical presentation of human CE caused by the only recently described novel species E. canadensis, in comparison to the well-described human infection with E. granulosus. In addition to the epidemiological consequences, it needs further studies to learn if perhaps some of the elder patients with a Central European geographic anamnesis and small liver cysts could be spared the risky operation. In conclusion, the different appearance of human CE caused by E. canadensis and E. granulosus, respectively, supports the most recent taxonomic revisions in the genus Echinococcus.

Footnotes

Authors' addresses: Renate Schneider and Herbert Auer, Department of Medical Parasitology, Institute of Specific Prophylaxis and Tropical Medicine, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria, E-mail: Herbert.auer@meduniwien.ac.at. Bernd Gollackner and Martin Schindl, University Clinic of Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Gerhard Tucek, Pathological-bacteriological Institute, Kaiser Franz Josef-Spital, Vienna, Austria.

References

  • 1.Budke CM. Global socioeconomic impact of cystic echinococcosis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:296–303. doi: 10.3201/eid1202.050499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Auer H, Aspöck H. Die zystische und die alveoläre Echinokokkose–die gefählichsten Helminthosen Mitteleuropas. Denisia. 2002;6:333–353. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Auer H, Aspöck H. Human alveolar echinococcosis in Austria: the recent epidemiological situation. Helminthologia. 2001;38:3–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Romig T, Dinkel A, Mackenstedt U. The present situation of echinococcosis in Europe. Parasitol Int. 2006;55((Suppl)):S187–S191. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2005.11.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nakao M, McManus DP, Schantz PM, Craig PS, Ito A. A molecular phylogeny of the genus Echinococcus inferred from complete mitochondrial genomes. Parasitology. 2007;134:713–722. doi: 10.1017/S0031182006001934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schneider R, Gollackner B, Edel B, Schmid K, Wrba F, Tucek G, Walochnik J, Auer H. Development of a new PCR protocol for the detection of species and genotypes (strains) of Echinococcus in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. Int J Parasitol. 2008;38:1065–1071. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2007.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.World Health Organization Informal Working Group International classification of ultrasound images in cystic echinococcosis for application in clinical and field epidemiological settings. Acta Trop. 2003;85:253–261. doi: 10.1016/s0001-706x(02)00223-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bowles J, McManus DP. NADH dehydrogenase 1 gene sequences compared for species and strains of the genus Echinococcus. Int J Parasitol. 1993;23:969–972. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(93)90065-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pawlowski Z, Stefaniak J. The pig strain of Echinococcus granulosus in humans: a neglected issue? Trends Parasitol. 2003;19:439. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4922(03)00199-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Turcekova L, Snabel V, D'Amelio S, Busi M, Dubinsky P. Morphological and genetic characterization of Echinococcus granulosus in the Slovak Republic. Acta Trop. 2003;85:223–229. doi: 10.1016/s0001-706x(02)00229-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Eckert J, Deplazes P. Biological, epidemiological, and clinical aspects of echinococcosis, a zoonosis of increasing concern. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004;17:107–135. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.1.107-135.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gonzalez LM, Daniel-Mwambete K, Montero E, Rosenzvit MC, McManus DP, Garate T, Cuesta-Bandera C. Further molecular discrimination of Spanish strains of Echinococcus granulosus. Exp Parasitol. 2002;102:46–56. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4894(02)00146-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Villalobos N, Gonzalez LM, Morales J, de Aluja AS, Jimenez MI, Blanco MA, Harrison LJ, Parkhouse RM, Garate T. Molecular identification of Echinococcus granulosus genotypes (G1 and G7) isolated from pigs in Mexico. Vet Parasitol. 2007;147:185–189. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Obwaller A, Schneider R, Walochnik J, Gollackner B, Deutz A, Janitschke K, Aspock H, Auer H. Echinococcus granulosus strain differentiation based on sequence heterogeneity in mitochondrial genes of cytochrome c oxidase-1 and NADH dehydrogenase-1. Parasitology. 2004;128:569–575. doi: 10.1017/s0031182004004871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Logar J, Soba B, Kotar T. Serological evidence for human cystic echinococcosis in Slovenia. BMC Infect Dis. 2008;8:63. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-8-63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Schantz PM. The burden of echinococcosis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73:1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Altintas N. Past to present: echinococcosis in Turkey. Acta Trop. 2003;85:105–112. doi: 10.1016/s0001-706x(02)00213-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gollackner B, Langle F, Auer H, Maier A, Mittlbock M, Agstner I, Karner J, Langer F, Aspock H, Loidolt H, Rockenschaub S, Steininger R. Radical surgical therapy of abdominal cystic hydatid disease: factors of recurrence. World J Surg. 2000;24:717–721. doi: 10.1007/s002689910115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Todorov T, Boeva V. Human echinococcosis in Bulgaria: a comparative epidemiological analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 1999;77:110–118. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Torgerson PR, Karaeva RR, Corkeri N, Abdyjaparov TA, Kuttubaev OT, Shaikenov BS. Human cystic echinococcosis in Kyrgystan: an epidemiological study. Acta Trop. 2003;85:51–61. doi: 10.1016/s0001-706x(02)00257-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jenkins DJ, Romig T, Thompson RC. Emergence/re-emergence of Echinococcus spp.–a global update. Int J Parasitol. 2005;35:1205–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dinkel A, Njoroge EM, Zimmermann A, Walz M, Zeyhle E, Elmahdi IE, Mackenstedt U, Romig T. A PCR system for detection of species and genotypes of the Echinococcus granulosus-complex, with reference to the epidemiological situation in eastern Africa. Int J Parasitol. 2004;34:645–653. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2003.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Naidich A, McManus DP, Canova SG, Gutierrez AM, Zhang W, Guarnera EA, Rosenzvit MC. Patent and pre-patent detection of Echinococcus granulosus genotypes in the definitive host. Mol Cell Probes. 2006;20:5–10. doi: 10.1016/j.mcp.2005.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Thompson RC, McManus DP. Towards a taxonomic revision of the genus Echinococcus. Trends Parasitol. 2002;18:452–457. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4922(02)02358-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Craig PS, McManus DP, Lightowlers MW, Chabalgoity JA, Garcia HH, Gavidia CM, Gilman RH, Gonzalez AE, Lorca M, Naquira C, Nieto A, Schantz PM. Prevention and control of cystic echinococcosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007;7:385–394. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70134-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chow C, Gauci CG, Vural G, Jenkins DJ, Heath DD, Rosenzvit MC, Harandi MF, Lightowlers MW. Echinococcus granulosus: variability of the host-protective EG95 vaccine antigen in G6 and G7 genotypic variants. Exp Parasitol. 2008;119:499–505. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2008.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lightowlers MW, Lawrence SB, Gauci CG, Young J, Ralston MJ, Maas D, Health DD. Vaccination against hydatidosis using a defined recombinant antigen. Parasite Immunol. 1996;18:457–462. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1996.tb01029.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene are provided here courtesy of The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

RESOURCES