Abstract
The murine model of T. cruzi infection has provided compelling evidence that development of host resistance against intracellular protozoans critically depends on the activation of members of the Toll-like receptor (TLR) family via the MyD88 adaptor molecule. However, the possibility that TLR/MyD88 signaling pathways also control the induction of immunoprotective CD8+ T cell-mediated effector functions has not been investigated to date. We addressed this question by measuring the frequencies of IFN-γ secreting CD8+ T cells specific for H-2Kb-restricted immunodominant peptides as well as the in vivo Ag-specific cytotoxic response in infected animals that are deficient either in TLR2, TLR4, TLR9 or MyD88 signaling pathways. Strikingly, we found that T. cruzi-infected Tlr2−/−, Tlr4−/−, Tlr9−/ − or Myd88−/− mice generated both specific cytotoxic responses and IFN-γ secreting CD8+ T cells at levels comparable to WT mice, although the frequency of IFN-γ+CD4+ cells was diminished in infected Myd88−/− mice. We also analyzed the efficiency of TLR4-driven immune responses against T. cruzi using TLR4-deficient mice on the C57BL genetic background (B6 and B10). Our studies demonstrated that TLR4 signaling is required for optimal production of IFN-γ, TNF-α and nitric oxide (NO) in the spleen of infected animals and, as a consequence, Tlr4−/− mice display higher parasitemia levels. Collectively, our results indicate that TLR4, as well as previously shown for TLR2, TLR9 and MyD88, contributes to the innate immune response and, consequently, resistance in the acute phase of infection, although each of these pathways is not individually essential for the generation of class I-restricted responses against T. cruzi.
Author Summary
Innate and acquired immune responses are triggered during infection with T. cruzi, the etiologic agent of Chagas' disease, and are critical for host survival. Parasite burden is usually controlled by the time the adaptive response becomes operational. Nevertheless, T. cruzi manages to subsist within intracellular niches and establishes a chronic infection, leading to the development of cardiomyopathy in approximately one-third of infected individuals. Recently, Toll-like receptors (TLRs) have been shown to recognize T. cruzi molecules and mice lacking MyD88, the key adaptor for most TLRs, are extremely susceptible to infection. Although TLRs are known to link innate and adaptive responses, their role in the establishment of crucial effector mechanisms mediated by CD8+ T cells during T. cruzi infection has not yet been determined. We analyzed the induction of IFN-γ and cytotoxic activity in vivo in TLR2-, TLR4-, TLR9- or MyD88-deficient mice during infection, and found intact responses compared to WT mice. We also demonstrated that TLR4 is required for optimal production of inflammatory cytokines and nitric oxide and, consequently, for a better control of parasitemia levels. Understanding how TLR activation leads to resistance to infection might contribute to the development of better strategies to improve immune responses against this pathogen.
Introduction
T. cruzi is an intracellular protozoan parasite that causes Chagas' disease, an endemic disorder affecting 16–20 million people which remains a health problem in Latin America. Although both innate and acquired immune responses are triggered during early infection and are critical for host survival, around 5% of individuals die due to myocarditis during the acute phase of the disease. In most cases, despite of the immune response, T. cruzi manages to subsist within the host and in approximately 30% of infected individuals it establishes a lifelong chronic illness presenting different clinical forms, including cardiomyopathy and megasyndrome in the gut [1]. Immunopathology due to parasite persistence is considered a key element in the development of chagasic cardiomyopathy, although a secondary role for autoimmunity is not completely excluded.
Different members of the family of Toll-like receptors (TLRs), by recognizing diverse pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) of bacterial, viral, fungal, and protozoan origin trigger the activation of innate immunity and the subsequent development of Ag-specific adaptive immunity [2]. To date, TLR2, TLR4, and TLR9 have been implicated in recognition of different T. cruzi-derived PAMPs [3]–[6]. TLR2 recognizes GPI-anchors of mucin-like proteins and the T. cruzi-released protein Tc52 [3], [4], whereas TLR4 is responsible for recognition of free glycoinositolphospholipids [5] and TLR9 is involved in recognition of the CpG motif present in T. cruzi DNA [6]. Mice deficient in MyD88, the adaptor molecule required for signaling events by most TLRs as well as IL-1R and IL-18R, show greatly enhanced susceptibility to infection with this protozoan parasite [7]. The susceptibility to infection of Tlr2−/, Tlr9−/− and Tlr2−/Tlr9−/− double knockout mice (all in the C57BL/6 background) has also been analyzed [6], [7]. Interestingly, although mice simultaneously lacking TLR2 and TLR9 are highly vulnerable to infection, their mortality rate is still less than that of Myd88−/− mice, pointing to the involvement of other TLRs and/or IL-1/IL-18 in the control of mortality.
In addition to MyD88-dependent activation, another transduction pathway is involved in signaling through TLR3 and TLR4. This pathway is mediated by the TIR domain-containing adaptor inducing IFN-γ (TRIF). Interestingly, Myd88−/−Trif−/− and Myd88−/−Ifnar−/− double knock out mice were even more sensitive to in vivo infection with T. cruzi than Myd88−/− mice, indicating that in addition to MyD88-dependent induction of proinflammatory cytokines, the TRIF-dependent production of type I IFN also contributes resistance to T. cruzi infection [8]. In accord with this observation, we have previously demonstrated that the lack of expression of functional TLR4 in mice of C3H background caused higher parasitemia and accelerated mortality to T. cruzi infection [5], although the mechanisms by which this occurs are not yet fully determined. However, since C3H WT mice are known to be more susceptible to T. cruzi infection when compared to mice of the C57BL strains, the direct comparison between the levels of susceptibility of C3H/HeJ (TLR4-deficient) mice and the other above mentioned Tlr−/− and Myd88−/− mice is difficult to interpret.
Therefore, one of the aims of the present work was to analyze the role of TLR4 in the C57BL background in the innate response to T. cruzi. For this, host cell invasion, parasite survival and release from infected macrophages, as well as nitric oxide (NO) production were quantified in C57BL/6 (WT) and TLR4-deficient cell cultures. We also evaluated the contribution of TLR4 to the in vivo control of parasitemia levels and survival, as well as to IFN-γ and TNF-α production in the B6 and B10 backgrounds. Importantly, the participation of TLR2, TLR4, TLR9 and MyD88 in the induction of crucial effector mechanisms of the adaptive response against T. cruzi was also investigated, measured as the Ag-specific IFN-γ production and cytotoxic response mediated by CD8+ T cells in infected mice.
Results
Defective early trypanosomicidal mechanism in TLR4-deficient macrophages
In order to compare the anti-T. cruzi microbicidal activity of WT and TLR4-deficient macrophages, it was first necessary to investigate whether the infection rate and parasite load were equivalent in both cases. Therefore we first compared the capacity of T. cruzi trypomastigotes to infect TLR4-deficient and WT macrophage (MO) cultures in three different genetic backgrounds: C3H, C57BL/10 and C57BL/6. Strains C3H/HeJ and C57BL/10ScN are natural mutants in which the Tlr4 gene suffered mutations that result either in a residue substitution (P712H), rendering the receptor non-functional, or a deletion, with non-expression of TLR4, respectively [9]. Engineered Tlr4 −/− in the B6 background was also previously described [10]. As shown in Figure 1A, no difference in the percentage of infected macrophages or in the number of parasites per macrophage after one hour of infection could be detected between cultures from the TLR4-deficient strains and their respective WT controls. However, when non-internalized parasites were extensively washed out after 1 h of interaction and the cultures were left to continue for three more hours, a significantly higher percentage of infected MO was found in TLR4-mutant cultures (Fig. S1). This result suggests the existence of an early microbicidal mechanism which is dependent on a functional TLR4. In agreement with that, the number of trypomastigotes released in the supernatant after the parasite completes its intracellular cycle in long-term cultures is significantly higher in the TLR4-deficient MO cultures (Fig. 1B–G). This is true for T. cruzi Y (Fig. 1C–G) and CL strains (Fig. 1B) and for both resident and elicited macrophages (Fig. 1F and 1G). Together these results indicated that although cell invasion by the parasite is not affected by the absence of a functional TLR4, T. cruzi growth is favored in TLR4-deficient MO, possibly due to a defective early anti-trypanosomacidal mechanism in TLR4-deficient MO.
TLR4 and T. cruzi colocalization in lysosomes of host cells
The expression of fluorescent TLR4 in cell lines allowed us to map TLR4 subcellular location, demonstrating its presence on the cellular surface and in the Golgi, similar to the TLR4 distribution observed in human monocytes [11]. It is also known that early after cell invasion the T. cruzi localizes in a host cell vacuole which fuses with peripheral lysosomes. HEK293 cells stably transfected with TLR4-yellow fluorescent protein and MD-2 (HEK-TLR4YFP) were infected with labeled T. cruzi trypomastigotes and 2.5 h later we analyzed parasite-TLR4 co-localization by confocal microscopy. Staining these infected cells with a lysosome probe also revealed that T. cruzi-TLR4 co-localization occurs in acidic compartments (Figure 2).
iNOS inhibition in infected WT macrophages leads to an increase in the number of released trypomastigotes equaling non-treated Tlr4−/− macrophages
Both NO and reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been shown to mediate T. cruzi killing [12]–[15]. Thus, we next analyzed the effects of adding NO and/or ROS inhibitors to the MO cultures during infection. Figure 3A shows that the addition of desferroxamine (DFO), an iron chelator which can also act as a free radical scavenger [16], causes a significant increase in the percentage of infected WT MO. This treatment abolishes the otherwise significant difference found in the percentage of infected MO between the non-treated WT and TLR4-deficient cultures. The same results are obtained when the inducible NO synthase (iNOS) inhibitor L-NMMA, or the combination of DFO and L-NMMA are added to these cultures. In order to further confirm the relevance of this early microbicidal mechanism, absent in TLR4-deficient MO, we tested the effect of inhibiting NO production in long term MO cultures, in which the number of parasites released by infected cells in the supernatant was evaluated several days after initial infection. As shown in Figure 3B, while iNOS inhibition had no effect in the number of parasites released by Tlr4−/− MO cultures, the addition of L-NMMA to the infected WT MO raised the number of trypomastigotes found in the supernatants to the levels observed in the Tlr4−/− MO cultures. In contrast, the addition of rIFN-γ an iNOS inducer to the MO cultures from the beginning of infection reduces the quantity of free trypomastigotes and results in equal numbers of released parasites from WT or TLR4-deficient MO (Fig. S2). Together, these results strongly suggest that the early trypanosomacidal mechanism absent in TLR4-deficient MO depends on ROS and NO induction.
Higher parasitemia and mortality in TLR4-deficient mice of C57BL background
We next compared parasitemia and mortality between different pairs of WT and TLR4-deficient mice (B10 or B6 versus B10/ScN or Tlr4 KO, respectively), after i.p. infection with 2×103 T. cruzi strain Y bloodstream trypomastigotes. Results in Figures 4A-C and 4D-F show that in both cases we found significantly higher parasitemia levels in TLR4-deficient mice, although the levels of parasites in the blood returned to very low or undetectable levels by day 11–12 post-infection and did not rise again, differently from what was previously described for C3H/HeJ mice, in which parasitemia levels were not controlled after day 15 pi [5]. We further monitored the mortality after infection and found that TLR4-deficiency in both B10 and B6 backgrounds results in higher lethality. Statistically significant differences, however, were consistently found only when comparing B10 and B10/ScN mice, while results with B6 and Tlr4− /− were more variable and did not reach statistical significance (Figure 4G and H). Of note, these results were obtained in male mice of 6–7 weeks of age, while in older TLR4-deficient mice the higher susceptibility could not be observed (data not shown). We have also performed experiments with lower (102) and higher (104 and 105) doses of infective T. cruzi forms/mice obtaining the same results (data not shown). Therefore, mice lacking TLR4 expression in a C57BL genetic background are more sensitive than their WT controls to infection with T. cruzi, although these strains do not display the uncontrolled parasitemia and the remarkable earlier mortality previously observed in the TLR4-mutant C3H/HeJ mice [5].
Splenocytes from infected TLR4-deficient mice produce lower NO levels than WT mice. NO inhibition in vivo makes WT and TLR4-deficient mice equally susceptible to infection
We then analyzed whether a lower NO production by the infected TLR4-deficient mice could explain their higher susceptibility to infection as suggested by the results obtained in vitro. In accordance with that hypothesis, the production of NO (inferred from nitrite levels in the supernatants) by spleen cells from infected TLR4-deficient mice was significantly reduced when compared with NO released by spleen cells from infected WT mice at day 10 post-infection (Figure 5A and B). Nitrite levels are also lower in the sera of TLR4-deficient mice, compared to WT animals, at this time point of infection (data not shown). Furthermore, the in vivo blockade of NO production in T. cruzi infected animals, by injection of the inducible NO synthase (iNOS) inhibitor aminoguanidine (AG) in the early phase of acute infection, brought the parasitemia and mortality of treated WT mice to the same levels obtained in treated Tlr4 −/− animals (Figure 5C and D). In animals injected every other day with AG, following a previously reported protocol [17], parasitemia kept rising until treatment was stopped on day 13 pi, attaining 3 and 7 fold higher levels of what was usually observed in Tlr4 −/− and WT non-treated animals, respectively (Figure 5C). This is due to the prevention of all NO generation, as for example in response to TLR2 and/or TLR9 signaling pathways, rather than exclusive inhibition of NO triggered by TLR4 engagement. Also, while non-treated infected animals usually die only after day 20 pi, earlier mortality was observed among AG-treated mice, with 50% mortality in both Tlr4 −/− and WT AG-treated groups by day 12 pi (Figure 5D). Hence, these results suggest that the lower NO production due to the absence of TLR4 expression during the early phase of infection with T. cruzi is responsible for the higher sensitivity observed in Tlr4 −/− mice.
The frequency of IFN-γ producing CD8+ T cells is not reduced in infected TLR4-deficient mice, although total spleen levels of IFN-γ and TNF-α are
As IFN-γ is thought to be the most important inducer of iNOS in macrophages and thus essential for mediation of NO-dependent parasite control during acute infection [18], we quantified IFN-γ production by spleen cells from WT and TLR4-deficient infected mice. As shown in Figure 6A, higher IFN-γ levels are indeed secreted by WT infected splenocytes at day 10 pi. We also compared the secretion of another crucial cytokine for iNOS expression and host resistance to T. cruzi, TNF-α [14] As shown in Figure 6B, the levels of TNF-α secreted by splenocytes from infected WT mice are also significantly higher than from TLR4-deficient mice. Both IFN-γ and TNF-α can be produced after T. cruzi-induced triggering of the innate immune response (mainly by NK/NKT cells and macrophages/DC respectively), as well as by CD8+ and CD4+ T lymphocytes later in the infection course, as part of the acquired response to the parasite. Since several previous studies have demonstrated the importance of IFN-γ secretion by CD8+ T cells in resistance to infection with T. cruzi [19], we asked if the frequency of Ag-specific IFN-γ-secreting cells would be altered in the absence of TLR4 expression. To do so, a previously defined H-2Kb-restricted epitope (PA8) derived from the amastigote surface protein-2 (ASP2), which is a member of the trans-sialidase family of surface proteins, was employed in ELISPOT assays [20]. However, as shown in Figure 6C no significant difference in the frequency Ag-specific IFN-γ secreting cells could be observed between WT and TLR4-deficient infected mice. Two other previously described trans-sialidase-derived peptides TSKB20 and TSKB18 [21] were alternatively employed in ELISPOT assays, giving the same results (not shown). The frequency of IFN-γ secreting CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the spleens of WT and TLR4-deficient mice at day 13 pi was also investigated by intracellular staining and results are shown in Figure 6D-G. These data show that the frequencies of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells secreting IFN-γ in response to T. cruzi-derived antigens are not reduced in Tlr4 −/− mice.
The frequency of defined peptide/H-2Kb-restricted IFN-γ secreting lymphocytes is not decreased in Tlr2 −/ −, Tlr4−/−, Tlr9−/− or Myd88−/− infected mice, nor is cytotoxicity
At this point, the present investigation was extended to compare the frequency of PA8/Kb-specific IFN-γ secreting lymphocytes between WT and mice which are deficient in other members of the TLR family, as well as Myd88−/− mice, whose susceptibility to T. cruzi infection was previously described [6], [7]. To our surprise, the frequency of these important effector cells of the acquired response is not altered in the spleens of Tlr2−/−, Tlr9−/ − or Myd88−/− mice, as with Tlr4-deficient mice (Figure 7A). We also estimated the percentage of IFN-γ secreting CD8+ T cells in the spleen of infected Myd88−/− mice at day 10 pi by intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) following in vitro stimulation with PA8 peptide and obtained the same results, that is, no significant difference in the frequency of IFN-γ+CD8+cells between WT B6 and Myd88−/− mice (Fig. 7B–D). In order to further evaluate the adaptive response to T. cruzi in Myd88−/− mice, the percentage of IFN-γ secreting T cells was measured by ICS in both CD4+ and CD8+ subsets at days 11 and 13 pi. As shown in Figure 8, although the absence of MyD88 signaling strongly affects the percentage of CD4+ IFN-γ cells in these mice, MyD88 expression is not essential for the differentiation of IFN-γ producing CD8+ T cells specific against T. cruzi-derived epitopes. Finally, we tested whether expansion of specific CD8+ cytotoxic T cells was affected in any of the above Tlr−/− or Myd88−/− mice. For this purpose, we used a functional cytotoxic assay which measures the in vivo elimination of target cells (total splenocytes) coated either with PA8 (Figs. 9A and C), TSKB20 or TSKB18 (Fig. 9B) peptides, as previously described [21]. The phenotype of effector cells mediating peptide-specific in vivo cell killing was established earlier as being CD8+ T cells [22]. The kinetics of Ag-specific cytotoxic CD8+ T cell development during infection with the Y strain of T. cruzi in mice was also previously determined, showing that the maximum cytotoxicity (close to 100% specific lysis) is attained around day 15 pi and continued at a high level in B6 mice, even until 100 days after challenge [22]. As shown in Fig. 9B, at day 20 post-infection, no difference in peptide-specific cytotoxicity could be detected between Tlr4−/− and WT mice for any of the tested peptides. The same was true for Myd88−/− mice, in which the in vivo cytotoxicity assay was performed at an earlier post-infection time point (day 10 pi) due to their earlier mortality [7] (Fig. 9B). A summary of the cytotoxicity experiments is shown in Figure 9C, where the results of specific killing obtained with the PA8 immunodominant peptide in Tlr2−/−, Tlr4 −/−, Tlr9−/− or Myd88−/− mice are compared to B6 controls. No difference in the levels of specific cytotoxicity was observed in any of these deficient mice. Together, these results clearly indicate that deficiency in TLR2, TLR4, TLR9 or even MyD88 expression does not impair CD8+ T cell effector responses during infection with T. cruzi.
Discussion
Different T. cruzi-derived molecules are able to induce host innate immune responses through the activation of different members of the TLR family, [3]–[6], [23], including glycoinositolphospholipids derived from the parasite membrane which induce a pro-inflammatory response through the TLR4 pathway [5], [23]. Thus, the documented high susceptibility of Myd88− /− mice to infection with T. cruzi could not be attributed to a single TLR, suggesting that different members of the TLR family act in concert in determining resistance to the pathogen [6]. Bafica and collaborators have shown that doubly deficient Tlr2−/− Tlr9−/− mice, although more susceptible than the single TLR2- or TLR9-deficient mice, do not display the acute mortality exhibited by Myd88−/− mice, suggesting that additional TLR/IL-1R family members are involved in the protection against infection with T. cruzi in mice [6]. In this context, the contribution of TLR4 signaling to control of the parasite burden in the C57BL/6 background was not investigated until the present study, as the only previous work on the subject was performed in mice of a different genetic background [5]. Importantly, the present work is the first to study the contribution of the different TLR and MyD88 pathways to the development of anti-T. cruzi responses mediated by CD8+ effector T cells, a critical element of the acquired immune response to the parasite.
The first question we addressed was to assess the role of TLR4 in T. cruzi internalization and triggering of very early microbicidal activity by macrophages. Infective T. cruzi trypomastigotes invade host cells using at least two different strategies; either by an active process recruiting host-cell lysosomes to the area of parasite cell contact or by an alternative pathway, in which the parasite infects phagocytic cells through conventional phagocytosis/endocytosis mechanism [24]–[26]. In both cases, the parasite may escape to the cytoplasm where it differentiates into the aflagellated amastigote form and begins intracellular replication. During cell invasion, T. cruzi interacts with different macrophage receptors to induce its own phagocytosis, but the nature of those receptors and the molecular mechanisms involved are still poorly understood. Although the general current view is that TLRs do not function directly as phagocytic receptors [27], a recent report indicated that during the invasion of T. cruzi, the activation of the Rab5-dependent phagocytic pathway is regulated by signals emanated through the parasite interaction with TLR2 in macrophages [28]. Our present results with Tlr4-deficient macrophages from three different mouse strains show that internalization of T. cruzi by macrophages is not affected by the absence of functional TLR4 expression. Some studies on the other hand, have demonstrated that TLR signaling by means of MyD88 can enhance phagosome acidification and function, the so-called phagosome maturation, which is required for effective sterilization of its contents [29]. In accord with those results, we found that after 2.5 h of infection, TLR4 and parasite co-localize into acidic compartments. Also, 4 h after infection, the percentage of TLR4-deficient macrophages infected with T. cruzi is significantly higher when compared to WT cells. The addition of iNOS or ROS inhibitors abolished the difference in the frequency of infected macrophages between cultures from TLR4-deficient and WT origin, indicating that this early trypanosomicidal mechanism triggered by TLR4 depends on the production of reactive nitrogen intermediates (RNI) and ROS, which have been described to participate in the microbicidal activity against T. cruzi and other pathogens [12]–[15]. Moreover, the fact that the simultaneous usage of iNOS and ROS inhibitors did not increase further the percentage of infected macrophages, suggests that the peroxynitrite anion (ONOO−), a strong oxidizing and against T. cruzi, formed by the reaction between nitric oxide (NO) and superoxide radical (O− 2), may be the main species responsible for the elimination of T. cruzi, as described [30], [31]cytotoxic effector molecule. Therefore, TLR4 signaling triggers an important early parasiticidal event against T. cruzi, which is dependent on the formation of NO and ROS. Significantly lower production of NO was also found in splenocyte cultures from Tlr4 −/− mice at day 10 post infection. In conformity to these results, we demonstrated that Tlr4 −/− splenocyte cultures produce lower levels of the main iNOS inducer cytokines, IFN-γ and TNF-α. As with the in vitro results obtained with macrophage cultures, the inhibition of NO production during in vivo infection made WT and Tlr4 −/− mice equally susceptible, as measured by mortality and parasite levels in the blood. Our results are in agreement with previous studies demonstrating that mice deficient for inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) are highly susceptible to T. cruzi [32], and that the inhibition of iNOS from the beginning of infection lead to an increase in trypomastigotes in the blood and to high mortality [15], [33]. Together, our results point to a significant contribution of the TLR4 pathway to the innate immune response against T. cruzi infection, with the production of NO playing a major role.
We show that mice of either B10 or B6 genetic background with TLR4 deficiency presented significantly elevated parasite numbers in the blood compared to their WT controls after in vivo infection with T. cruzi. These results are in accordance with our previous work showing higher parasitemia levels of the Tlr4 mutant C3H/HeJ mice [5], although this is more pronounced in the latter lineage. Concerning mortality, however, the absence of functional TLR4 expression in B10 or B6 mice do not lead to the acute mortality previously observed in C3H/HeJ mice [5]. Therefore, the effects of TLR4 deficiency on susceptibility to infection with T. cruzi are more evident in the C3H background. Inbred strains of mice may vary from highly resistant to highly susceptible, as reflected by parasitemia levels and survival time and, following these criteria, C3H strains have been classified as “susceptible”. Classical genetic studies previously established that the resistance to T. cruzi is governed by multiple genetic factors, including H-2-linked gene(s) [34], [35] and the combination of different alleles in a group of loci confers resistance or susceptibility to infection. Therefore, analogous to the effects due to the absence of TLR2, which only become perceptible in mice with the concomitant deficiency on TLR9 [6], we have shown here that the susceptibility resulting from the absence of TLR4 is less pronounced in the resistant B6 and B10 backgrounds, compared to C3H strains.
IFN-γ is an important mediator of resistance to T. cruzi. Besides iNOS, IFN-γ regulates the expression of a large number of genes, including chemokines and chemokine receptors, which were shown to play a role in IFN-γ-mediated protection in T. cruzi infection [18], [32], [36]. Early during infection, IFN-γ is secreted by NK cells and other cell types, as part of the innate response, and later on the infection course by activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Since TLRs have been implicated in the modulation of acquired immunity against several pathogens, we have herein addressed the question of whether the frequencies of IFN-γ secreting CD8+ and CD4+ T cells are altered in Tlr4−/ mice. Our data showed no significant difference in the frequencies of IFN-γ producing CD8+ or CD4+ T cells in the spleens of Tlr4 −/− and WT mice, indicating that TLR4 deficiency does not interfere with these important effectors of the acquired response against T. cruzi. Therefore, the higher level of IFN-γ detected in the supernatants of WT splenocyte cultures at day 10 pi is probably contributed by cells of the innate response. A number of different cells types may account for that and we are currently evaluating their phenotype.
On the other hand, a significant reduction in the levels of the IFN-γ+CD4+ T cell population was observed in the spleens of Myd88−/− infected mice. This finding is in line with previous in vitro experiments [6], but contrasts to the results of a recent paper, where IFN-γ production by CD4+ T cells is shown to be preserved in Myd88−/− mice infected with the Tulahuen strain of T. cruzi [37]. The reason for this apparent discrepancy is not clear and could be due to the different strain of parasite used for infection or to the method employed for CD4+ T cell re-stimulation in vitro. Therefore, our results demonstrate that although the CD4+ T cell-mediated response is substantially diminished, unaltered frequencies of CD8+ IFN-γ T cells specific for Kb-restricted T. cruzi-derived peptides are present in the spleens of Myd88−/− mice compared to WT controls at days 10, 11 and 13 pi.
CD8+ T cell mediated responses are a critical component of protective immunity in T. cruzi infection, since in their absence mice quickly succumb to the infection or develop a more severe chronic disease (reviewed in [19]). Moreover, CD8+ T cells can be induced by vaccination to provide protection from lethal infection [38]. CD8+ T cells can control infection via a number of mechanisms: in addition to the already discussed secretion of IFN-γ inducing microbicidal activity in the host cell, the direct cytotoxic function against cells infected with T. cruzi is also a main effector response. Therefore, it is an important issue to define whether TLR-MyD88 mediated pathways can play a role in the priming and/or control of the cytotoxic T cell response against T. cruzi-infected targets. According to the present paradigm, this could be mainly achieved by the engagement of TLRs on antigen-presenting cells (APCs) such as dendritic cells (DCs), promoting upregulation of co-stimulatory molecules, enhancement of antigen processing and presentation, as well as secretion of Th1 polarizing pro-inflammatory cytokines by the DCs [2]. We demonstrated here, however, that the cytotoxic response mediated by CD8+ T cells against H-2Kb-restricted immunodominant peptides in T. cruzi infected mice is not dependent on TLR2, TLR4 nor TLR9 expression. Unexpectedly, the Ag-specific cytotoxic function was also preserved in Myd88−/− mice. As the cytotoxic response against the immunodominant PA8 T. cruzi epitope tested here was previously shown to be dependent on MHC class II restricted CD4+ T cells [39], our results indicate that although diminished in frequency, the residual response of CD4+ activated T cells observed in infected Myd88−/− mice is sufficient for their licensing function, which results in the development of parasite-specific CD8+mediated cytotoxic response. A first possible interpretation of these results is that none of the tested TLR and MyD88 pathways are involved in the generation of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells during T. cruzi infection. In fact, other signaling molecules and innate recognition systems might contribute to adaptive immunity to T. cruzi as the members of the Nod-like receptor protein (NLR) family [40]. Other examples are: 1) the release of pro-inflammatory bradykinin peptide by the parasite proteases during infection and consequent DC maturation induced by bradykinin B2 receptors (B2R) [41] and 2) the recently described DC maturation induced by NFATc1 activation and consequent IFN-γ production in a TLR-independent pathway [37]. However, to date, it was not determined if these TLR-independent pathways can fully account for the preserved CD8+ T cell cytotoxic response against T. cruzi-infected targets observed in Myd88−/− mice.
In our opinion, there is another plausible hypothesis to be considered for explaining the preserved CD8+ T cell cytotoxic response in Tlr2−/−, Tlr4−/−, Tlr9−/− or Myd88−/− mice: it is known that type I IFNs affect DC maturation [42], [43] and can also stimulate survival, development of cytolytic function, and production of IFN-γ by CD8+ T cells [44], [45]. Moreover, mice deprived of the type I IFN receptor, Ifnar −/−, develop higher parasitemia levels in comparison with control 129Sv mice [46] and doubly deficient Myd88−/−Ifnar−/− mice are highly susceptible to infection with T. cruzi [8]. Both TLR9 and TLR4 could induce type I IFN secretion through MyD88-dependent and -independent pathways, respectively. Therefore, TLR4 and TLR9 would be redundant concerning type I IFN production and might compensate for each other's absence in Tlr4−/− or Tlr9−/− mice. The TLR4-triggered TRIF pathway is also preserved in Myd88−/− mice and its activation would lead to type I IFN secretion and DC maturation, with the consequent normal adaptive responses against T. cruzi in these mice. Testing whether the CD8-mediated cytotoxicity against T. cruzi is affected in Tlr4−/−Tlr9−/− or Tlr4−/−Myd88−/− doubly deficient mice is one of our future goals. According to this hypothesis, cytotoxic CD8+ T cells would not be preserved in doubly deficient Myd88−/−Trif−/− mice, which is in agreement with the fact that these mice are even more susceptible to infection, as indicated by accelerated mortality when compared to single Myd88−/− mice [8]. Also, in opposition to Myd88−/−, the doubly deficient Myd88−/−Trif−/− mice are not able to control the levels of parasite in the blood [8].
The maintenance of CD8+ acquired responses against T. cruzi in Myd88−/− mice finds a parallel in studies of murine infection with Toxoplasma gondii, another intracellular protozoan parasite. As for T. cruzi, multiple TLR ligands were identified in T. gondii and Myd88−/− mice were shown to be highly susceptible to infection (reviewed in [47]). Interestingly, a recent work demonstrated that a robust and protective IFN-γ response can be elicited in Myd88−/− mice infected with an avirulent T. gondii strain [48]. Therefore, the MyD88 pathway is required for innate immunity to control infection with Toxoplasma, even though adaptive immunity against the pathogen can be triggered without the need for this TLR adaptor molecule. The same picture emerges from our present results with T. cruzi. The absence of a role for the MyD88 pathway in the generation of CD8+ adaptive responses during T. cruzi infection is also in line with other previous reports analyzing the immune response to other pathogens [49], [50], including the described protective CD8+ T cell response against the intracellular bacteria Listeria [51].
The preservation of CD8+ T cell mediated effector mechanisms in MyD88-deficient mice is in agreement with the fact that despite their high mortality, these mice do succeed in controlling the number of parasites in the blood, in contrast to the even more susceptible Ifng−/−, IfngR−/−, iNos−/− or Myd88−/−Trif−/− mice [8], [32], [36]. At present we do not know why Myd88−/−mice succumb earlier than WT mice and display 100% mortality to T. cruzi infection, notwithstanding their capacity of controlling blood parasitemia [7] and their preserved CD8+ T cell-mediated responses shown here. We would like to consider four non-exclusive possibilities: First, Myd88−/−mice, whose IFN-γ levels in serum were shown to be significantly lower [7], would also be affected by the fact that several genes, like iNOS and IP-10, have been shown to be 5- to 100-fold less extensively induced by IFN-γ in macrophages lacking MyD88 expression [52]. Second, the higher susceptibility of Myd88−/− mice could be directly attributed to the defective activation of CD4+ T cells demonstrated here, as this cell population has also been demonstrated to be essential for resistance to infection [53], probably through IFN-γ and TNF-α secretion. We do not know at the present what mechanism, absent in Myd88−/− mice, affects CD4+ T cell activation. Both attenuated DC maturation due to the absence of TLRs/MyD88 triggering and the absence of IL-1R/IL-18R signaling in CD4+ Myd88−/− T cells should be considered. Third, the lower levels of CD4+ helpers might also have indirect consequences as a defect in the B cell mediated response, which was also described to be necessary for resistance to the parasite [54]. In fact, although controversy exists, the requirement of TLR-MyD88 signaling for the generation of T-dependent antigen-specific antibody responses was proposed [55], [56] and, interestingly, antibody responses against different virus are altered or completely lost in Myd88−/− mice [57]–[59]. Finally, another possible consequence of a deficiency in CD4+ cell activation could be the defective migration of CTLs into peripheral sites of infection distinct of the spleen (liver and heart, for example), as recently demonstrated by Nakanishi et al. in a mouse model of herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection of the vagina [60].
In summary, the results obtained in the present study strongly argue in favor of a role for the TLR4 signaling in the innate immune response against T. cruzi displayed by B6 mice. Notably, we have also shown here that neither the absence of TLR2, TLR4 or TLR9 individually, nor the ablation of all MyD88-mediated pathways affect the development of cytotoxic and IFN-γ-producing CD8+ T cells, which are crucial effector mechanisms against this parasite. Determining precisely how TLR-TRIF-MyD88 activation contributes to trigger protective immunity against T. cruzi will be of critical relevance for vaccine development against this important human parasite.
Materials and Methods
Mice and ethics statement
All animal experiments were approved by and conducted in accordance with guidelines of the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (Comitê de Ética do Centro de Ciências da Saúde CEUA -CCS/UFRJ). Tlr2−/−, Tlr4−/−, Tlr9−/− and Myd88−/− mice were generated by and obtained from Dr. S. Akira (Osaka University, Japan) via Dr. R. T. Gazzinelli (Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil). Tlr2−/− and Tlr4−/− mice were maintained along C57BL/6 mice at the Laboratório de Animais Transgênicos (LAT, IBCCF°, UFRJ, RJ, Brazil). C3H/HeJ and C3H/HePas mice were from ICB, Universidade de São Paulo (USP, SP, Brazil). C57BL/10 and C57BL/10ScN mice were maintained at the Biotério of the Department of Immunology (IMPPG, UFRJ, RJ, Brazil). Tlr9−/− and Myd88−/− mice were maintained at the Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou (FIOCRUZ, MG, Brazil).
Parasite and experimental infection
Mice used for experiments were sex- and age-matched, and housed with a 12-h light-dark cycle. Bloodstream trypomastigotes of the Y strain of T. cruzi [61] were obtained from BALB/c mice infected 7 days earlier. The concentration of parasites was estimated and each mouse (at least 4 per group) was inoculated intraperitoneally (i.p.) with 0.2 ml (2×103 trypomastigotes). Parasitemia was monitored by counting the number of bloodstream trypomastigotes in 5 µl of fresh blood collected from the tail vein. Mouse survival was followed daily.
In vitro infection
Resident or elicited macrophages (obtained from the peritoneal cavity on day 4 after injection of 2.5 ml of 3% thioglycollate) were plated in triplicates and infected with trypomastigotes at a 1∶10 (macrophage:trypomastigote) ratio. After 1 h of infection, the cells were washed four times with PBS to remove the extracellular parasites and cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS (GIBCO, Invitrogen) for the indicated time periods at 37°C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Trypomastigotes in the culture supernatants were counted microscopically in triplicates. Alternatively, extracellular parasites were removed by repeated washing after 1 h of infection and the cells were either washed, fixed and stained with Giemsa or cultured for a further 4 h in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS before fixation and staining. In other experiments, macrophages were infected for 1 h in the presence of L-NMMA (1 mM) and/or DFO (100 µM); after washing, cells were cultured for further 4 h in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS in the presence of L-NMMA (1 mM) and/or DFO (100 µM) and subsequently fixed and stained with Giemsa. The percentage of infected macrophages and the intracellular parasite numbers in 100 macrophages were counted under a light microscope.
Confocal microscopy
The stable cell line of HEK293 cells expressing the fluorescent protein TLR4YFP and MD-2 constructs were described previously [11] and kindly donated by Dr D. Golenbock (University of Massachusetts Medical School, MA). Trypomastigotes were labeled with TO-PRO-3 (1 µl/ml, Molecular Probes, Invitrogen) for 30 min at RT, washed twice and then cultured with HEK- TLR4YFP cells at 10∶1 ratio for 1 hour at 37°C, 5% CO2. After repeated washing with PBS for extracellular parasite removal, cells were stained with LysoTracker Red probe (75 nM, Molecular Probes, Invitrogen) for 1 hour. Cells were then washed in PBS containing 1 mM MgCl2 and 1 mM CaCl2 and fixed in 3,7% paraformaldehyde/PBS for 15 min. Confocal microscopy was performed with a Zeiss Axiovert 200-M inverted microscope equipped with an LSM 510 Meta laser-scanning unit. Image analysis was performed with LSM 510 software (Zeiss).
Griess reaction for RNI quantification
The Griess reaction was performed to quantitate nitrite concentrations in the supernatant of macrophage or spleen cell cultures, as previously described [62]. Briefly, 50 µl of sample plus 50 µl of Griess reagent were incubated for 10 min at RT, followed by detection at 550 nm in an automated ELISA plate reader. The results are expressed in units of micromolar, and were determined comparing the absorbance readings of the experimental samples to a sodium nitrate standard curve.
Inhibition of iNOS in vivo
Inhibition of iNOS in vivo was performed by injecting mice i.p. with 50 mg/kg of aminoguanidine/body weight, (AG, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis), diluted in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), every other day, as previously described [20]. Treatment started 4 h before infection with T. cruzi (performed as described above), and animals were treated until day 13 pi. Control mice received the same volume (200 µl) of PBS. A third group of mice received AG only.
ELISPOT
The ELISPOT assay was performed essentially as described earlier [63]. Briefly, the preparation of plates was done by coating 96-well nitrocellulose plates Multiscreen HA (Millipore) with 60 µl/well of sterile PBS containing 10 µg/ml of the anti-mouse IFN-γ mAb R4-6A2 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). After overnight incubation at RT, mAb solution was removed by sterile aspiration and the plates were washed three times with plain RPMI 1640 medium under sterile conditions. Plates were blocked by incubating wells with 100 µl RPMI medium containing 10% (v/v) FBS for at least 2 h at 37°C. Responder cells were obtained from spleens of B6 mice. Responder cells were ressuspended to a concentration of 106 viable cells per ml in RPMI medium (GIBCO, Invitrogen) supplemented with 10 mM HEPES, 2 mM L-glutamine, 5×10−5 M 2-β-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 100 U/ml of penicillin and streptomycin, 10% (v/v) FBS (all purchased from GIBCO, Invitrogen). B6 spleen cells adjusted to a concentration of 4×106 viable cells per ml were used as antigen presenting cells after incubation or not with the synthetic peptide at a final concentration of 10 µM for 30 min at 37°C. One hundred microliters of suspension containing responders or antigen presenting cells were pipetted into each well. The plates were incubated for 24 h at 37°C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. After incubation, the bulk of cultured cells was flicked out. To remove residual cells, plates were washed 3 times with PBS and 3 times with PBS-Tween. Each well received 75 µl of biotinylated anti-mouse IFN-γ mAb XMG1.2 (BD Biosciences) diluted in PBS-Tween to a final concentration of 2 µg/ml. Plates were incubated overnight at 4°C. Unbound antibodies were removed by washing the plates at least 6 times with PBS-Tween. Peroxidase-labeled streptavidin (KPL) was added at a 1∶800 dilution in PBS-Tween in a final volume of 100 µl/well. Plates were incubated for 1–2 h at RT and then washed three to five times with PBS-Tween and three times with PBS. Plates were developed by adding 100 µl/well of peroxidase substrate (50 mM Tris–HCl at pH 7.5 containing 1 mg/ml of DAB and 1 µl/ml of 30% hydrogen peroxide solution, both from Sigma). After incubation at RT for 15 min, the reaction was stopped by discarding the substrate solution and rinsing the plates under running tap water. Plates were dried at RT and spots were counted with the aid of a stereomicroscope (Nikon) or in the ImmunoSpot® Analyzer (Cellular Technology Ltd., Shaker Heights, OH, USA). Results of the ELISPOT assay are representative of two or more independent experiments.
Generation of T. cruzi amastigote extract
Tissue culture trypomastigotes of the Y strain of T. cruzi were transformed to amastigotes in acidic DMEM/10% FCS for 24 h at 37°C, as previously described [64]. Parasites were pelleted, washed in PBS, and subjected to more than five rounds of freeze-thawing followed by sonication. Cellular debris were removed by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm, and the soluble fraction was boiled for 5 min to denature the proteins. Protein concentrations were determined using a Bio-Rad protein assay.
Intracellular cytokine staining
Splenocytes isolated from infected mice were cultured either with T. cruzi amastigote extract at 10 µg/ml (see above) or with PA8 peptide (VNHRFTLV) at 10 µM, or left unstimulated, for 5 h to 14 h at 37°C in the presence of brefeldin A (Sigma-Aldrich). Cells were surface stained with anti-CD8-PerCP and anti-CD4-FITC (BD Biosciences) and fixed for 10 minutes with a solution containing PBS, 4% paraformaldehyde at RT. Then, cells were permeabilized for 15 minutes with PBS, 0.1% bovine serum albumine, 0.1% saponin (Sigma-Aldrich). Intracellular cytokine staining was performed with anti- IFN-γ -PE (BD Biosciences). At least 10,000 gated CD8+ lymphocyte events were acquired. Analytical flow cytometry was conducted with a FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences) and the data were processed with CellQuest software (BD Biosciences).
In vivo cytotoxicity assay
For the in vivo cytotoxicity assays, splenocytes of the different mouse strains were divided into two populations and labeled with the fluorogenic dye CFSE (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen) at a final concentration of 5 µM (CFSEhigh) or 0.5 µM (CFSElow). CFSEhigh cells were pulsed for 40 min at 37°C with 1–2.5 µM of either H-2Kb -restricted ASP-2 peptide, also called PA8, (VNHRFTLV), H-2Kb- restricted TsKb-18 peptide (ANYDFTLV) or H-2Kb- restricted TsKb-20 peptide (ANYKFTLV). CFSElow cells remained unpulsed. Subsequently, CFSEhigh cells were washed and mixed with equal numbers of CFSElow cells before injecting i.v. 15–20×106 total cells per mouse. Recipient animals were mice that had been infected or not with T. cruzi. Spleen cells of recipient mice were collected 20 h after transfer, fixed with 2.0% paraformaldehyde and analyzed by cytometry, using a FACSCalibur Cytometer (BD Biosciences). Percentage of CFSElow (M1) and CFSEhigh (M2) cells were obtained using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences). Percentage of specific lysis was determined using the formula: 1 - ((M2infected/M1infected)/(M2naïve/M1naive)) ×100%.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 4.00 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego California USA, www.graphpad.com). Data were compared using a two-tailed Student's t test and are expressed as mean ± SEM. Data were considered statistically significant if p values were <0.05. The LogRank test was used to compare the mouse survival rate after challenge with T. cruzi. The differences were considered significant when the P value was <0.05.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We are in debt to Dr. J. Scharfstein (UFRJ, RJ, Brazil) and Dr. P. Tobias (The Scripps Research Institute, CA, USA) for helpful discussion and reviewing the manuscript.
Footnotes
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
This work was supported by Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), Conselho Nacional de Pesquisas (CNPq)-Edital Universal and by The Millennium Institute for Vaccine Development and Technology (CNPq - 420067/2005-1), The National Institute for Science and Technology in Translacional Research in Health and Environment of the Amazon Region (INCT-PETA-CNPq) and by the The National Institute for Science and Technology in Vaccines (INCTV-CNPq). ACO received a PhD fellowship form CAPES, BCdA and FT received PhD fellowships from FAPESP, and WK, RNdS and GSC received PIBIC/CNPq fellowships for undergraduate students. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Dutra WO, Gollob KJ. Current concepts in immunoregulation and pathology of human Chagas disease. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2008;21:287–292. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e3282f88b80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Iwasaki A, Medzhitov R. Toll-like receptor control of the adaptive immune responses. Nat Immunol. 2004;5:987–995. doi: 10.1038/ni1112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Campos MA, Almeida IC, Takeuchi O, Akira S, Valente EP, et al. Activation of Toll-like receptor-2 by glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchors from a protozoan parasite. J Immunol. 2001;167:416–423. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.1.416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ouaissi A, Guilvard E, Delneste Y, Caron G, Magistrelli G, et al. The Trypanosoma cruzi Tc52-released protein induces human dendritic cell maturation, signals via Toll-like receptor 2, and confers protection against lethal infection. J Immunol. 2002;168:6366–6374. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.12.6366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Oliveira A-C, Peixoto RJ, Arruda LB, Campos MA, Gazzinelli RT, et al. Expression of functional TLR4 confers pro-inflammatory responsiveness to Trypanosoma cruzi glycoinositolphospholipids and higher resistance to infection with T. cruzi. J Immunol. 2004;173:5688–5696. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.9.5688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bafica A, Santiago HC, Goldszmid R, Ropert C, Gazzinelli RT, et al. Cutting edge: TLR9 and TLR2 signaling together account for MyD88-dependent control of parasitemia in Trypanosoma cruzi infection. J Immunol. 2006;177:3515–3519. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.6.3515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Campos MA, Closel M, Valente EP, Cardoso JE, Akira S, et al. Impaired production of proinflammatory cytokines and host resistance to acute infection with Trypanosoma cruzi in mice lacking functional myeloid differentiation factor 88. J Immunol. 2004;172:1711–1718. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.3.1711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Koga R, Hamano S, Kuwata H, Atarashi K, Ogawa M, et al. TLR-dependent induction of IFN-β mediates host defense against Trypanosoma cruzi. J Immunol. 2006;177:7059–7066. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.10.7059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Poltorak A, He X, Smirnova I, Liu MY, Van Huffel C, et al. Defective LPS signaling in C3H/HeJ and C57BL/10ScCr mice: mutations in Tlr4 gene. Science. 1998;282:2085–2088. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5396.2085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Takeuchi O, Hoshino K, Kawai T, Sanjo H, Takada H, et al. Differential roles of TLR2 and TLR4 in recognition of gram-negative and gram-positive bacterial cell wall components. Immunity. 1999;11:443–451. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80119-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Latz E, Visintin A, Lien E, Fitzgerald KA, Monks BG, et al. Lipopolysaccharide rapidly traffics to and from the Golgi apparatus with the toll-like receptor 4-MD-2-CD14 complex in a process that is distinct from the initiation of signal transduction. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:47834–47843. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M207873200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tanaka Y, Kiyotaki C, Tanowitz H, Bloom BR. Reconstitution of a variant macrophage cell line defective in oxygen metabolism with a H2O2-generating system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982;79:2584–2588. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.8.2584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Locksley RM, Klebanoff SJ. Oxygen-dependent microbicidal systems of phagocytes and host defense against intracellular protozoa. J Cell Biochem. 1983;22:173–185. doi: 10.1002/jcb.240220306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Munoz-Fernandez MA, Fernandez MA, Fresno M. Synergism between tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interferon-gamma on macrophage activation for the killing of intracellular Trypanosoma cruzi through a nitric oxide-dependent mechanism. Eur J Immunol. 1992;22:301–307. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830220203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Vespa GN, Cunha FQ, Silva JS. Nitric oxide is involved in control of Trypanosoma cruzi-induced parasitemia and directly kills the parasite in vitro. Infect Immun. 1994;62:5177–5182. doi: 10.1128/iai.62.11.5177-5182.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Balcerczyk A, Sowa K, Bartosz G. Metal chelators react also with reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;352:522–525. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.11.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Martins GA, Vieira LQ, Cunha FQ, Silva JS. Gamma interferon modulates CD95 (Fas) and CD95 ligand (Fas-L) expression and nitric oxide-induced apoptosis during the acute phase of Trypanosoma cruzi infection: a possible role in immune response control. Infect Immun. 1999;67:3864–3871. doi: 10.1128/iai.67.8.3864-3871.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gazzinelli RT, Oswald IP, Hieny S, James SL, Sher A. The microbicidal activity of interferon-gamma-treated macrophages against Trypanosoma cruzi involves an L-arginine-dependent, nitrogen oxide-mediated mechanism inhibitable by interleukin-10 and transforming growth factor-beta. Eur J Immunol. 1992;22:2501–2506. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830221006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Martin D, Tarleton R. Generation, specificity, and function of CD8+ T cells in Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Immunol Rev. 2004;201:304–317. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.00183.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Low HP, Santos MA, Wizel B, Tarleton RL. Amastigote surface proteins of Trypanosoma cruzi are targets for CD8+ CTL. J Immunol. 1998;160:1817–1823. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Martin DL, Weatherly DB, Laucella SA, Cabinian MA, Crim MT, et al. CD8+ T-Cell responses to Trypanosoma cruzi are highly focused on strain-variant trans-sialidase epitopes. PLoS Pathog. 2006;2:e77. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020077. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tzelepis F, de Alencar BC, Penido ML, Gazzinelli RT, Persechini PM, et al. Distinct kinetics of effector CD8+ cytotoxic T cells after infection with Trypanosoma cruzi in naive or vaccinated mice. Infect Immun. 2006;74:2477–2481. doi: 10.1128/IAI.74.4.2477-2481.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Medeiros MM, Peixoto JR, Oliveira AC, Cardilo-Reis L, Koatz VL, et al. Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)-dependent proinflammatory and immunomodulatory properties of the glycoinositolphospholipid (GIPL) from Trypanosoma cruzi. J Leukoc Biol. 2007;82:488–496. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0706478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tardieux I, Webster P, Ravesloot J, Boron W, Lunn JA, et al. Lysosome recruitment and fusion are early events required for trypanosome invasion of mammalian cells. Cell. 1992;71:1117–1130. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(05)80061-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Burleigh BA. Host cell signaling and Trypanosoma cruzi invasion: do all roads lead to lysosomes? Sci STKE. 2005;2005:pe36. doi: 10.1126/stke.2932005pe36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Woolsey AM, Sunwoo L, Petersen CA, Brachmann SM, Cantley LC, et al. Novel PI 3-kinase-dependent mechanisms of trypanosome invasion and vacuole maturation. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:3611–3622. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Underhill DM, Gantner B. Integration of Toll-like receptor and phagocytic signaling for tailored immunity. Microbes Infect. 2004;6:1368–1373. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2004.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Maganto-Garcia E, Punzon C, Terhorst C, Fresno M. Rab5 activation by Toll-like receptor 2 is required for Trypanosoma cruzi internalization and replication in macrophages. Traffic. 2008;9:1299–1315. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00760.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Blander JM, Medzhitov R. Regulation of phagosome maturation by signals from toll-like receptors. Science. 2004;304:1014–1018. doi: 10.1126/science.1096158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Denicola A, Rubbo H, Rodriguez D, Radi R. Peroxynitrite-mediated cytotoxicity to Trypanosoma cruzi. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1993;304:279–286. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1993.1350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Alvarez MN, Piacenza L, Irigoin F, Peluffo G, Radi R. Macrophage-derived peroxynitrite diffusion and toxicity to Trypanosoma cruzi. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2004;432:222–232. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2004.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Holscher C, Kohler G, Muller U, Mossmann H, Schaub GA, et al. Defective nitric oxide effector functions lead to extreme susceptibility of Trypanosoma cruzi-infected mice deficient in gamma interferon receptor or inducible nitric oxide synthase. Infect Immun. 1998;66:1208–1215. doi: 10.1128/iai.66.3.1208-1215.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Saeftel M, Fleischer B, Hoerauf A. Stage-dependent role of nitric oxide in control of Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Infect Immun. 2001;69:2252–2259. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.4.2252-2259.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wrightsman R, Krassner S, Watson J. Genetic control of responses to Trypanosoma cruzi in mice: multiple genes influencing parasitemia and survival. Infect Immun. 1982;36:637–644. doi: 10.1128/iai.36.2.637-644.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Trischmann TM, Bloom BR. Genetics of murine resistance to Trypanosoma cruzi. Infect Immun. 1982;35:546–551. doi: 10.1128/iai.35.2.546-551.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Aliberti JC, Souto JT, Marino AP, Lannes-Vieira J, Teixeira MM, et al. Modulation of chemokine production and inflammatory responses in interferon-gamma- and tumor necrosis factor-R1-deficient mice during Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Am J Pathol. 2001;158:1433–1440. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)64094-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kayama H, Koga R, Atarashi K, Okuyama M, Kimura T, et al. NFATc1 mediates Toll-like receptor-independent innate immune responses during Trypanosoma cruzi infection. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000514. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000514. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Machado AV, Cardoso JE, Claser C, Rodrigues MM, Gazzinelli RT, et al. Long-term protective immunity induced against Trypanosoma cruzi infection after vaccination with recombinant adenoviruses encoding amastigote surface protein-2 and trans-sialidase. Hum Gene Ther. 2006;17:898–908. doi: 10.1089/hum.2006.17.898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tzelepis F, Persechini PM, Rodrigues MM. Modulation of CD4+ T cell-dependent specific cytotoxic CD8+ T cells differentiation and proliferation by the timing of increase in the pathogen load. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Silva GK, Gutierrez FRS, Guedes PMM, Horta CV, Cunha LD, et al. Cutting Edge: Nucleotide-Binding Oligomerization Domain 1-Dependent Responses Account for Murine Resistance against Trypanosoma cruzi Infection. J Immunol. 2009 doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902254. jimmunol.0902254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Monteiro AC, Schmitz V, Morrot A, de Arruda LB, Nagajyothi F, et al. Bradykinin B2 Receptors of dendritic cells, acting as sensors of kinins proteolytically released by Trypanosoma cruzi, are critical for the development of protective type-1 responses. PLoS Pathog. 2007;3:e185. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030185. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gallucci S, Lolkema M, Matzinger P. Natural adjuvants: endogenous activators of dendritic cells. Nat Med. 1999;5:1249–1255. doi: 10.1038/15200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Luft T, Pang KC, Thomas E, Hertzog P, Hart DN, et al. Type I IFNs enhance the terminal differentiation of dendritic cells. J Immunol. 1998;161:1947–1953. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Curtsinger JM, Valenzuela JO, Agarwal P, Lins D, Mescher MF. Type I IFNs provide a third signal to CD8 T cells to stimulate clonal expansion and differentiation. J Immunol. 2005;174:4465–4469. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.8.4465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lang PA, Cervantes-Barragan L, Verschoor A, Navarini AA, Recher M, et al. Hematopoietic cell-derived interferon controls viral replication and virus-induced disease. Blood. 2009;113:1045–1052. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-10-117861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Costa VM, Torres KC, Mendonca RZ, Gresser I, Gollob KJ, et al. Type I IFNs stimulate nitric oxide production and resistance to Trypanosoma cruzi infection. J Immunol. 2006;177:3193–3200. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.5.3193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Egan CE, Sukhumavasi W, Butcher BA, Denkers EY. Functional aspects of Toll-like receptor/MyD88 signalling during protozoan infection: focus on Toxoplasma gondii. Clin Exp Immunol. 2009;156:17–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2009.03876.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sukhumavasi W, Egan CE, Warren AL, Taylor GA, Fox BA, et al. TLR adaptor MyD88 is essential for pathogen control during oral Toxoplasma gondii infection but not adaptive immunity induced by a vaccine strain of the parasite. J Immunol. 2008;181:3464–3473. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.5.3464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bolz DD, Sundsbak RS, Ma Y, Akira S, Kirschning CJ, et al. MyD88 plays a unique role in host defense but not arthritis development in Lyme disease. J Immunol. 2004;173:2003–2010. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.3.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.von Bernuth H, Picard C, Jin Z, Pankla R, Xiao H, et al. Pyogenic bacterial infections in humans with MyD88 deficiency. Science. 2008;321:691–696. doi: 10.1126/science.1158298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Way SS, Kollmann TR, Hajjar AM, Wilson CB. Cutting edge: protective cell-mediated immunity to Listeria monocytogenes in the absence of myeloid differentiation factor 88. J Immunol. 2003;171:533–537. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.2.533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Shi S, Nathan C, Schnappinger D, Drenkow J, Fuortes M, et al. MyD88 Primes Macrophages for Full-Scale Activation by Interferon-{gamma} yet Mediates Few Responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Exp Med. 2003;198:987–997. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Tarleton RL, Grusby MJ, Postan M, Glimcher LH. Trypanosoma cruzi infection in MHC-deficient mice: further evidence for the role of both class I- and class II-restricted T cells in immune resistance and disease. Int Immunol. 1996;8:13–22. doi: 10.1093/intimm/8.1.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kumar S, Tarleton RL. The relative contribution of antibody production and CD8+ T cell function to immune control of Trypanosoma cruzi. Parasite Immunol. 1998;20:207–216. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3024.1998.00154.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Pasare C, Medzhitov R. Control of B-cell responses by Toll-like receptors. Nature. 2005;438:364–368. doi: 10.1038/nature04267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Gavin AL, Hoebe K, Duong B, Ota T, Martin C, et al. Adjuvant-enhanced antibody responses in the absence of toll-like receptor signaling. Science. 2006;314:1936–1938. doi: 10.1126/science.1135299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Browne EP, Littman DR. Myd88 is required for an antibody response to retroviral infection. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000298. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000298. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Heer AK, Shamshiev A, Donda A, Uematsu S, Akira S, et al. TLR signaling fine-tunes anti-influenza B cell responses without regulating effector T cell responses. J Immunol. 2007;178:2182–2191. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.4.2182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Guay HM, Andreyeva TA, Garcea RL, Welsh RM, Szomolanyi-Tsuda E. MyD88 is required for the formation of long-term humoral immunity to virus infection. J Immunol. 2007;178:5124–5131. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.8.5124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Nakanishi Y, Lu B, Gerard C, Iwasaki A. CD8+ T lymphocyte mobilization to virus-infected tissue requires CD4+ T-cell help. Nature. 2009;462:510–513. doi: 10.1038/nature08511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Pereira da Silva LH, Nussenzweig V. Sobre uma cepa de Trypanosoma cruzi altamente virulenta para o camundongo branco. Fol Clin Biol. 1953;20:191. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Green LC, Wagner DA, Glogowski J, Skipper PL, Wishnok JS, et al. Analysis of nitrate, nitrite, and [15N]nitrate in biological fluids. Anal Biochem. 1982;126:131–138. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(82)90118-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.de Alencar BC, Araujo AF, Penido ML, Gazzinelli RT, Rodrigues MM. Cross-priming of long lived protective CD8+ T cells against Trypanosoma cruzi infection: importance of a TLR9 agonist and CD4+ T cells. Vaccine. 2007;25:6018–6027. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Martin DL, Tarleton RL. Antigen-Specific T Cells Maintain an Effector Memory Phenotype during Persistent Trypanosoma cruzi Infection. J Immunol. 2005;174:1594–1601. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.3.1594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.