Skip to main content
Deutsches Ärzteblatt International logoLink to Deutsches Ärzteblatt International
. 2010 Apr 9;107(14):241–247. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0241

Analgesia and Sedation for Painful Interventions in Children and Adolescents

Christoph Neuhäuser 1,*, Bendicht Wagner 2, Matthias Heckmann 3, Markus A Weigand 4, Klaus-Peter Zimmer 3
PMCID: PMC2861766  PMID: 20436776

Abstract

Background

Painful procedures on children and adolescents often have to be performed with the aid of analgesia and sedation in order to prevent pain and emotional distress. Moreover, many procedures can be performed more rapidly and more effectively in a relaxed patient. Because the combination of analgesia and sedation can cause serious or even life-threatening complications, it must be accompanied by the same safety precautions as a general anesthetic.

Methods

Selective review of the literature.

Results

A high level of safety can be achieved by adherence to the published guidelines of the societies for anesthesiology and pediatrics. The depth of sedation during procedures performed under combined analgesia and sedation is often equivalent to that resulting from general anesthesia. Therefore, in order to avoid serious complications, combined analgesia and sedation should only be administered by physicians trained in pediatric anesthesia or pediatric critical care. This is particularly so when propofol is used, because it has a narrow therapeutic range and can cause cardiorespiratory respiratory problems without warning. As long as the appropriate safety precautions are followed, non-anesthesiologists can also administer propofol in combination with an analgesic, such as ketamine, to children and adolescents.

Conclusion

In children and adolescents, the combination of analgesia and sedation can prevent the emotional trauma that would result from a painful procedure, while often enhancing the quality of the procedure itself. This method should be considered a variant of general anesthesia. Accordingly, any non-anesthesiologist employing this method must be as well versed as an anesthesiologist in the management of its specific side effects and complications.


Children and adolescents can suffer considerable pain during the smallest interventions, even without an existing tissue injury—especially when they are afraid (e1). The negative consequences of inadequate pain therapy in this age group can be extensive (e.g., traumatization, chronification) (1, e2, e3).

The importance of adequate preventive pain therapy is often underestimated. In addition to thoroughgoing analgesia, the management of painful interventions in children also requires adequate sedation/analgesia, partly in order to keep the intervention stress-free for the child, so that no psychological traumatization results, and partly to ensure adequate toleration of the procedure. Young children in particular lack the ability to understand that they are ill and need treatment to the extent that they can accept the treatment (2); but for older children and adolescents, too, medical interventions usually signify an indefinable threat that carries a considerable psychological burden (e4).

It has long since become reality in clinical routine that sedation/analgesia for brief interventions in children is carried out not only by anesthesiologists, but increasingly also by non-anesthesiologists (e5). This state of affairs can only be supported, however, so long as the care provided by non-anesthesiologists is of the same quality and can guarantee the safety of the patient. In a retrospective study Coté et al. analyzed factors that led to 95 selected adverse sedation events, 51 of which were fatal (3). In all cases they found serious infringements of the safety standards current in anesthesiology. When carrying out sedation/analgesia in children, it must be particularly borne in mind that painful interventions in this age group often require a deeper level of sedation than in adults (4, 5). The basic principle is that the deeper the sedation, the greater the risk of respiratory and cardiovascular complications (57). Equally, however, too shallow sedation/analgesia can increase the spectrum of complications (e6). As regards the sedation level attained (box 1), sedation/analgesia must be regarded as a variant of general anesthesia (4, 8, 9). In consequence, the same safety aspects must be required as for general anesthesia. Where the sedation/analgesia is not carried out by anesthesiologists, therefore, “sedation teams” should be created who show similar competence (10, 11). To create a standard of care and limit the risks for the patients, the professional societies for anesthesiology and pediatrics have published guidelines for the practice of sedation by non-anesthesiologists (6, 7, 12). This review will look more closely at the relevant recommendations for the practice of sedation/analgesia. Sedation management for non-painful procedures (e.g., CT, MRI) will not be discussed.

Box 1. Definitions according to the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA)*1.

  • Sedation

    • Condition that allows patients to tolerate uncomfortable procedures while maintaining adequate respiratory and cardiovascular function.

  • Deep sedation

    • Drug-induced loss of consciousness in which patients cannot be easily aroused but respond purposefully to repeated and/or painful stimuli.

  • General anesthesia

    • Drug-induced loss of consciousness in which patients do not respond purposefully even to painful stimuli.

  • Levels of sedation in sedation/analgesia

    • May be in the region of “deep sedation,” but frequently a state is reached similar to general anesthesia, especially if the patient must not show any kind of reaction during the procedure (4, 8, 9). Sedation/analgesia therefore represents a variant of general anesthesia.

  • Spontaneous ventilation during sedation/analgesia

    • As a rule spontaneous ventilation is adequately maintained, so because of the usually short duration (5 to 45 minutes) intubation is not necessary. The fasting guidelines must be followed. Airway obstruction may be overcome using, e.g., the Esmarch maneuver (jaw thrust maneuver); transient phases of respiratory insufficiency or apnea are managed by mask ventilation.

  • Indications for intubation

    • Should be decided on an individual basis (depending on the nature and duration of the procedure, fasting state, and the child’s age, previous illnesses, and anatomy. Intubation anesthesia should be carried out by an anesthesiologist.

  • Change in level of consciousness

    • The nature, combination, and dosage of the drugs used determine the sedation level. Irrespective of which drugs are used, transitions from one level of consciousness to the next deeper one occur on a continuum, vary between individuals, and can be very rapid (15). In addition, the relationship between stimulating factors (e.g., pain) and depressing factors (e.g., drugs) determines the degree of sedation and may vary during the procedure. Particular care is required at the end of the intervention, because when stimulation ceases, the patient may fall into a deeper level of sedation than desired.

  • Influence of sedation level on ventilatory and cardiovascular function

    • Increasing loss of consciousness is accompanied by a loss of tone in the pharyngeal musculature and the tongue, with the risk of airway obstruction and impairment of protective reflexes (coughing and swallowing); hypnea, apnea, and arterial hypotension are also more likely. At the level of general anesthesia, therefore, intervention to secure ventilatory and cardiovascular function become increasingly necessary (6).

*1 modified from (6, e39)

Indications

Any fear-inducing/unpleasant procedure associated with pain, and painful interventions that require maximum toleration or immobility are indications for sedation/analgesia (Box 2). Reservations about when sedation is indicated in children (especially young children) are not justifiable (e7). Sedation/analgesia when properly carried out does not traumatize the child or adolescent and helps to improve the quality of medical interventions (9, 13).

Box 2. Examples of interventions for which sedation/analgesia is usually indicated.

  • Colonoscopy

  • Gastroscopy, transesophageal echocardiography

  • Bronchoscopy

  • Biopsies (e.g., liver, muscle)

  • Fracture and wound care

  • Change of dressings

  • Placement of drains and catheters (e.g., thoracic drain)

  • Ultrasound-guided puncture

  • Bone marrow aspiration

Psychological aids and non-medical methods, e.g., a child-friendly environment, age-appropriate distraction strategies, explanations, the presence of the parents until the child is asleep, positive reinforcement through comforting, praise and loving attention, can all reduce fear and stress before the procedure and should be given to all children (e8).

Pain during so-called “minor interventions” on the surface of the body (e.g., venous access, vascular and lumbar puncture) can be reduced with a topical local anesthetic (e9). Infiltration anesthesia, on the other hand (e.g., lidocaine, mepivacaine), can in itself be very unpleasant for children. Fear and agitation (e.g., fear of the needle) can make it necessary to give oral premedication (e.g., midazolam) or additional sedation in these cases. Although local anesthesia has an important role in pain therapy during painful interventions, the emphasis in this review will be on intravenously administered analgesia and sedation.

Special patient groups

Newborns and infants, especially premature infants, require special procedures (an experienced team, intubation narcosis if necessary, hospital admission). A high incidence of apnea and hypoxia is to be expected (immaturity of the respiratory center, unstable airways, smaller functional residual capacity). A longer monitoring period of up to 72 hours is advisable especially in premature babies up to a postconceptual age of 50 weeks (e10).

Particular care is also required in children with

  • Respiratory impairment (severe asthma, upper airway infection in the past 6 weeks, chronic pulmonary disease)

  • Cardiovascular disease (heart defect, pulmonary hypertension, cardiomyopathy)

  • Gastroesophageal reflux or other disease of the esophagus/stomach

  • Restricted hepatic and renal clearance

  • Muscular and metabolic disease (be aware of contraindications)

  • Neurodegenerative disease (cerebral palsy, latent dysphagia)

  • Craniofacial malformations.

Recommendations from the professional societies (6, 7, 12)

Preparation

Before sedation/analgesia, the following are to be performed in every case:

  • Measurement of biometric data, history, diagnoses (allergies, heart and liver disease), previous medication

  • Physical examination, especially of the airways, with a view to identifying potential difficulties with mask ventilation or intubation

  • Risk assessment and ASA physical status classification (table 1)

  • Laboratory tests depend on the nature of the intervention and any underlying disease

  • The patient (or the patient’s parent or guardian) must be informed about the nature of the procedure on the day before it is carried out

  • Arrange for fasting before elective procedures (table 2). If a fasting state cannot be awaited (emergency procedures), or if gastric emptying is delayed (after trauma, medication, ileus, or intestinal stenosis), the risk of pulmonary aspiration must be taken into account (possibly alternative procedure, delay the procedure, intubation anesthesia carried out by an anesthesiologist).

  • Oral premedication for anxiolysis (e.g., midazolam) if necessary, and agree medication for the day of the procedure.

Table 1. ASA physical status classification *1.

ASA class Examples Suitability for sedation
I A normally healthy patient Normal history and exam No restrictions
II A patient with mild systemic disease without restricted function Child with controlled reactive airway disease Usually no restrictions
III A patient with severe systemic disease and definitely restricted function Child with asthma and marked stridor (wheezing) Some restrictions; a risk–benefit analysis should be carried out
IV A patient with severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life Child with status asthmaticus Massive restrictions; usually benefit is smaller than risk
V A moribund patient who is not expected to survive without the operation Child in cardiogenic shock, intended to undergo heart transplantation Not suitable

*1 ASA physical status classification according to (6, 7)

Table 2. Minimum fasting periods *1.

Fasting periods before elective procedures
Age Solid food, breast milk Infant formula Clear liquids
<1 year 4 h 4 h 2 h
>1 year 6 h 2 h

*1 Modified from (e40)

Location for sedation/analgesia

Sedation/analgesia may only be carried out at a location where typical complications can be recognized and treated. A defibrillator (with age-appropriate paddles) should be rapidly available in case of emergency.

Monitoring

Basic monitoring after sedation includes:

  • Continuous pulse oximetry (with acoustic signal)

  • Electrocardiogram

  • Non-invasive blood pressure measurement (before the start of sedation, then at 5-minute intervals).

The level of sedation is monitored clinically. The airways and the position of the child’s head should always be checked for airway obstruction; respiration is assessed clinically (precordial stethoscope if necessary). Sidestream capnography, e.g., with a nasal catheter in spontaneously breathing patients, can be helpful in practice. This procedure is practical both for trend analysis and for apnea recognition (e11, e12), although in some circumstances the values shown for end-expiratory CO2 can vary from the actual values (e13). If clinical assessment is limited, capnography is recommended for additional safety in ventilation monitoring (7).

If the monitoring is being done automatically, the monitor’s alarms must be set so that critical events and changes are recognized immediately.

Documentation

Vital signs, the nature and dosage of drugs and how and when they are administered, the amount of oxygen given, and all emergency measures (ventilation, intubation, etc.) must be documented (at the start of analgesic/sedative administration and then at 5-minute intervals during analgesia/sedation and during the recovery period).

Oxygen

Sedation/analgesia should not be carried out without giving supplemetal oxygen. If apnea occurs, the drop in saturation may be delayed, and for this reason the respiration must be closely monitored clinically (capnography may be used).

In premature infants born before the 37th gestational week, and in patients with heart defects, the normal saturation limits for these groups must be maintained.

Sedation team

The sedation team consists of a physician and a nurse who have undergone structured training in carrying out sedation/analgesia (correct use of sedative and analgesics, monitoring of consciousness) and in airway management (mask ventilation, intubation) in children and adolescents and who have adequate experience of the latter. They must both be exclusively tasked with carrying out the sedation:

  • The physician’s responsibility is to continuously monitor the patient, administer and adjust the drugs, and manage any complications (table 3). At least one physician must be present who has sufficient knowledge and experience of extended cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the relevant age group.

  • The nurse must be trained for this task in this age group, and have enough experience to be able to help the physician with the monitoring and all procedures required.

  • Help from an anesthesiologist with experience of pediatric anesthesia or a specialist in pediatric intensive medicine (pediatrician with additional specialization in pediatric intensive medicine) should be available within a few minutes (14).

  • Patients in ASA classes I and II do not usually suffer any extra problems in sedation/analgesia and can therefore be managed by a sedation team with the qualifications listed above. Patients in ASA classes III and IV, and patients with particular pre-existing diseases (e.g., pulmonary or cardiac problems) or those with anatomically difficult airways, on the other hand, should be cared for primarily by pediatric anesthesiologists or pediatric intensivists.

Table 3. Typical complications and options for their management.

Complication Management options
Airway obstruction – Esmarch maneuver (jaw thrust maneuver—upward and anterior displacement of the jaw using both hands)
– Oro- or nasopharyngeal tube
– Patient in lateral position (pharyngeal space ca. 50% larger than when patient supine)
Apnea, hypopnea – Mask ventilation with supplemental oxygen
– Intubation (if mask ventilation inadequate or not possible)
Laryngospasm – Mask ventilation with supplemental oxygen
– If required, general anesthesia with relaxation and intubation
Vomiting, regurgitation, aspiration – Patient in lateral recumbent position, apply suction
– If aspiration occurs:
– Supplemental oxygen if saturation below 95%
– Intubation and ventilation (PEEP) if necessary
– Bronchoscopy, chest radiograph if necessary
– Antibiotics if patient shows signs of infection following the procedure
Arterial hypotension – Volume replacement: Any of NaCl 0.9%, Ringer lactate, or HAES 6%, 10 to 20 mL/kg IV
– In life-threatening cases: vasopressors (epinephrine, norepinephrine, 1 to 10 µg/kg per dose, IV)
Bradycardia – Atropine 20 µg/kg per dose, IV
– In life-threatening cases: epinephrine 1 to 10 µg/kg per dose, IV
Allergic reaction, anaphylaxis – H1-blockers
(e.g., dimethindene 0.025 to 0.5 mg/kg per dose, IV) and H2-blockers (e.g., ranitidine 1 to 2 mg/kg per dose, IV
– Steroids
(e.g., methylprednisolone 5 to 10 mg/kg per dose, IV)
– Symptoms of shock: volume therapy and epinephrine 1 to 10 µg/kg per dose, IV

Intravenous access

Intravenous access (IV access) should be created before the start of sedation, e.g., using an EMLA patch.

Transfer and discharge criteria

After sedation/analgesia, children should be monitored in a suitable child-friendly location. If the patient is not completely awake, oxygen saturation and heart rate should be continuously registered. A long monitoring period may be necessary (drugs with a long half-life, use of antagonists, certain patient groups). Once the child is able to stay awake for 20 minutes in a quiet environment, it is very probably safe to transfer it elsewhere (e14). Neonates, infants, and children with learning difficulties should return to their presedation status.

The following criteria must always be fulfilled:

  • Stable and sufficient cardiovascular and respiratory function

  • Stable, open airways with adequate protective reflexes (swallowing, coughing)

  • Patient awake or easily roused (speaking, sitting up)

  • Normothermia and adequate hydration.

We discharge ambulant patients when they are completely awake and have tolerated a meal appropriate for their age.

Intravenous sedation/analgesia

Basic principles

It is difficult to predict how any individual child will react to being given a sedative or analgesic (4, 5, 8). The optimal degree of sedation/analgesia must therefore be determined individually for each patient and in dependence on the procedure being carried out. Although children often need higher doses by body weight than adults, they also react with respiratory depression and airway obstruction more quickly than do adults (5, 16). They change more quickly, usually without warning, from one sedation level to the next deeper one (4).

Midazolam and propofol are suitable sedatives and must be combined with ketamine or an opioid (e.g., fentanyl) (etable). The combination of midazolam and ketamine has the lowest complication rate.

eTable. Drug preparation*1.

Preparation Pediatric dosage Effect onset (minutes) Effect duration (minutes) Analgesia/Remarks
Midazolam Intravenously (0.5 to 5 years): initially 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg, IV: 2 to 3 IV: 45 to 60 – Effects: anxiolytic, amnestic, anticonvulsant, sedative, central muscle relaxation
then titrate to effect up to a maximum of 0.6 mg/kg PO: 15 to 30 PO: 60 to 90
Intravenous (6 to 12 years): initially 0.025 to 0.05 mg/kg, IN: 10 to 15 IN: 60 – Wide therapeutic spectrum (as single substance)
then titrate to effect up to a maximum of 0.4 mg/kg; – Reduced dose when combined with opioids
Orally: 0.5 to 0.75 mg/kg – Paradoxical reactions possible (avoid underdosing)
Intranasally: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg – Respiratory depression possible with rapid IV administration or in combination with opioids
– Intranasal use unpleasant
– ANTAGONIST: flumazenil 0.005 to 0.01 mg/kg IV
Propofol Intravenously: IV:<1 IV: 5 to 15 No
initially 1.0 to 2.0 mg/kg, – Narrow therapeutic spectrum
then 0.5 to 1.0 mg/kg titrated to effect – License: general anesthesia > 1 month of age
Via a perfusor: 3 to 6 mg/kg/h – Typical: injection pain [avoid: e.g., 1 mL lidocaine 1% per 20 mL propofol 1% or lower concentration 5 mg/mL (0.5%) instead of 10 mg/mL (1 %)]
– Absolute contraindications: allergy (egg, soya, and peanut allergy), sedation of pediatric intensive care patients < 16 years (risk of PRIS)
– Relative contraindications: children < 3 years with acute airway infection (risk of PRIS)
– Frequent side effects: airway obstruction, apnea, hypotension, bradycardia, flushing
– Rare side effects: rhabdomyolysis, pancreatitis, myoclonia, hyperlipidemia (1 mL propofol 1% contains 0.1 g/mL fat; max. rate: 2 mL/kg per hour)
Fentanyl Intravenously: 0.5 to 1.0 ìg/kg (up to 50 ìg/dose), IV: 3 to 5 IV: 15 to 30 Yes
may be repeated every 3 to 5 minutes until effective – Narrow therapeutic spectrum
– Side effects: respiratory depression, bradycardia, thorax rigidity, low histamine liberation
– ANTAGONIST: naloxone 0.01–0.04 mg/kg IV
Ketamine IV: 1 to 2 IV: 30 to 60 Yes
Racemate Intravenously: 1.0 to 2.0 mg/kg – Not hypnosis but “dissociative anesthesia”
slowly over 30 to 60 seconds, – Wide therapeutic spectrum
may be repeated every 10 minutes according to effect – Relative contraindications: raised ICP, perforating eye injury, pulmonary and arterial hypertonia, aortic and mitral stenosis, hyperthyreosis, epilepsy and psychiatric illness
S(+)-Ketamine Intravenously: 0.5 to 2.0 mg/kg IV: 1 to 2 IV: 30 to 60 – Side effects: nightmares (therefore: combine with benzodiazepines), hypersalivation (atropine or glycopyrrolate), nausea and vomiting
slowly over 30 to 60 seconds,
may be repeated every 10 minutes according to effect
– almost no respiratory depression (as single substance), protective reflexes are generally preserved
– Cardiovascular stimulation, bronchodilation
EMLA Neonates/infants: 0.5 g (max. 1 to (2) g) 45 to 90 60 to 120 – 1 g cream contains 25 mg lidocaine and 25 g prilocaine
Young children: 1 g (max. 10 g)
School-age children: 1 g (max. 20 g) – Relative contraindications: neonates and premature infants < 3 months old (risk of methemoglobinemia)
Adolescents: 1.5 to 2 g – Application time: 30–45 minutes (risk of vein maceration)

*1 Modified from (5); IV, intravenously; PO, orally; IN, intranasally; ICP, intracranial pressure; PRIS, propofol infusion syndrome.

The following principles must be observed:

  • No sedative drugs may be given without medical monitoring and an “emergency plan.”

  • No sedations may be carried out without adequate analgesia or local anesthesia.

  • Combinations of more than one sedative with more than one analgesic should be avoided. Complication rates rise with the number of drugs used (15).

  • Titrating the drugs used by giving repeated small doses until the desired effect is attained (“titration to effect”) is better than giving single doses based on body weight. The cumulative dose may be higher than is recommended in the literature; the pharmacology of the drugs must be taken into account.

  • Intramuscular administration should be avoided, as should oral and rectal administration (the exception is oral premedication), as the absorption is often difficult to predict (delayed effect, giving later additional doses can be dangerous).

  • Antagonists should be available. The duration of effect of antagonists may be shorter than that of the antagonized drugs.

Propofol

Propofol (2,6-di-isopropylphenol) is a hypnotic whose pharmacological properties make it extremely well suited to sedation and anesthesia. Propofol has no analgesic effect and must therefore be combined with ketamine or opioids for sedation/analgesia. Because of its high potency and the respiratory and cardiovascular complications that can result, propofol may only be used when strict precautionary measures are observed (e15). In Germany 1% propofol is licensed for general anesthesia only in children older than 1 month; it is not licensed for sedation under the age of 16 years (e16). While propofol cannot be recommended for long-term sedation of children (e.g., in intensive care), because of the increased risk of propofol infusion syndrome (e17), 1% propofol is suitable for off-label use for short-term sedation of children older than 1 month (ASA class I–II), provided the guidelines described are adhered to (9, 14, 1719, e18e20).

The main advantages of propofol are that it takes effect rapidly, achieves a deep state of sleep (hypnosis) quickly and safely, has a relatively short duration of effect, recovery is pleasant, there are few contraindications, barely any hangover, and it has an antiemetic effect (etable). In addition, it can be given to patients with a predisposition to or suspected malignant hyperthermia, and those with acute hepatic porphyria (without lidocaine), epilepsy, and muscular diseases (e21, e22). Nevertheless, a clear advantage of propofol as against, for example, midazolam/ketamine, for sedation/ analgesia in children has not been demonstrated in studies (e23, e24). The incidence of airway problems and consequent falls in saturation values is in fact higher with propofol (e12, e23e25).

Propofol can be administered as boluses (titrate to effect) or by maintenance infusion (etable). The typical pain associated with injection can, for example, be alleviated by giving lidocaine (e26). It should be noted that the therapeutic spectrum in relation to respiratory problems is relatively narrow (20, e27). To achieve 100% toleration during painful procedures in children, Powers et al. needed to give boluses of 2.2 mg/kg followed by infusion of 3 mg/kg per hour (9), corresponding to a drug concentration in the brain (effect side concentration, ESC) of 3.0 to 4.0 µg/mL (e28). the critical ESC, at which airway collapse can occur, is reported to be 4.0 µg/mL (e29). However, pharyngeal dysfunction with dysphagia has been described even at lower ESC (e30). According to current studies, in 2% to 31% of children there was an initial drop in transcutaneous oxygen saturation to below 95% and respiratory support was needed in from 1% to 19% of cases (18, 21, e18, e19, e23, e25). Thus, airway obstruction and a need for respiratory support should always be anticipated during propofol sedation (typically after the initial bolus). Arterial hypotension (especially in patients with hypovolemia), relative bradycardia, and flushing are also frequent but seldom require treatment (21, e18, e19, e23, e25). Propofol infusion syndrome (PRIS), on the other hand, although carrying a high mortality, is very rare worldwide given the millions of times the drug is employed (22, 23, e31, e32).

Despite the risk potential of propofol, studies indicate that it can be used very safely for sedation/analgesia in children even by non-anesthesiologists given the correct training and so long as they observe the guidelines (9, 14, 1719, 24, 25).

Anesthesia/analgesia

Whenever possible, local anesthesia to prevent pain (e.g., by subcutaneous injection) is to be preferred. The injection should not be carried out until the child has gone to sleep (children do not like needles). If local anesthesia is not possible, adequate analgesia can be ensured by intravenous administration of ketamine or fentanyl. Ketamine is a derivative of phencyclidine (dissociative anesthesia) with analgesic effect (antagonist of NMDA and agonist of µ-opiate receptors), available as a racemate or as the more potent S(+)-enantiomer (etable). Because of its slight respiratory depressive and cardiovascular stimulatory effects, it is well suited to combination with hypnotics and sedatives (especially propofol) (21, e33e35). Disadvantages are the possibility of psychotropic side effects and drooling (etable). Fentanyl is a potent opioid that can be used against strong pain (etable). Like all opioids, however, fentanyl increases the tendency to respiratory depression, hypotension, and bradycardia (21, e36e38).

Conclusion

Children and adolescents need adequate sedation/analgesia for many painful diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. If these are to be carried out safely, the guidelines of the professional societies for anesthesiology and pediatrics must be followed (24). An approach to sedation is required that is adapted both to the needs of children and adolescents and to the intervention to be performed; it must be carried out correctly, professionally, and in a routine manner by a team consisting of a physician and a nurse who have received structured training and are experienced in working with this age group (11, 19).

Key Messages.

  • During painful procedures and interventions, children need adequate sedation/analgesia to prevent psychological and physical injury.

  • Following the guidelines on sedation and analgesia in children and adolescents published by the professional societies for anesthesiology and pediatrics increases patient safety.

  • Creating a “sedation team” consisting of a physician and a nurse, both specially trained for the task, reduces complication rates, increases patient safety, and contributes to the success of the interventions.

  • Non-anesthesiologists specially trained for the task (the sedation team) can provide patient safety during sedation/analgesia of ASA class I and II patients that is comparable to that provided by anesthesiologists (including when propofol is used).

  • In terms of the safety and comfort of the patient, and the success rate of the interventions, deep sedation correctly carried out is preferable to inadequate, over-shallow sedation.

  • In terms of the success of sedation/analgesia, no drug combination (e.g., propofol+ketamine, midazolam+ketamine, propofol+fentanyl, midazolam+fentanyl) has been shown to be superior to any other.

Acknowledgments

Translated from the original German by Kersti Wagstaff, MA

Footnotes

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Weigand has received lecture fees from Glaxo SmithKline, Pfizer, and Braun. Dr. Neuhäuser, Prof. Zimmer, Dr. Heckmann and Dr. Wagner declare that no conflict of interest exists according to the guidelines of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.

References

  • 1.Zernikow B, Hechler T. Pain therapy in children and adolescents. Dtsch Arztebl. 2008;105(28-29):511–522. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2008.0511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Reinhold P, Köster-Oehlmann P. Schmerzhafte interventionelle Eingriffe. In: Zernikow B, editor. Schmertherapie bei Kindern. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer; 2001. pp. 140–157. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Coté CJ, Notterman DA, Karl HW, Weinberg JA, McCloskey C. Adverse sedation events in pediatrics: a critical incident analysis of contributing factors. Pediatrics. 2000;105:805–814. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.4.805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dial S, Silver P, Bock K, Sagy M. Pediatric sedation for procedures titrated to a desired degree of immobility results in unpredictable depth of sedation. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2001;17:414–420. doi: 10.1097/00006565-200112000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Krauss B, Green SM. Procedural sedation and analgesia in children. Lancet. 2006;367:766–780. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68230-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.American Society of Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:1004–1017. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200204000-00031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Coté CJ, Wilson S the Work Group on Sedation. Guidelines for Monitoring and Management of Pediatric Patients During and After Sedation for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures: An Update. Pediatrics. 2006;118:2587–2602. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-2780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Reeves ST, Havidich JE, Tobin DP. Conscious sedation of children with propofol is anything but conscious. Pediatrics. 2004;114:74–76. doi: 10.1542/peds.114.1.e74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Powers KS, Nazarian EB, Tapyrik SA, et al. Bispectral index as a guide for titration of propofol during procedural sedation among children. Pediatrics. 2005;115:1666–1674. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Motas D, McDermott NB, VanSickle T, Friesen RH. Depth of con-sciousness and deep sedation attained in children as administered by nonanesthesiologists in a children’s hospital. Paediatr Anaesth. 2004;14:256–260. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.01184.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lowrie L, Weiss AH, Lacombe C. The pediatric sedation unit: a mech-anism for pediatric sedation. Pediatrics. 1998;102 doi: 10.1542/peds.102.3.e30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Taeger K. Leitlinie zur Sedierung und Analgesie (Analgosedierung) von Patienten durch Nicht-Anästhesisten. Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin. 2002;10:639–641. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wengrower D, Gonzal D, Gonzal Y, et al. Complicated endoscopic pediatric procedures using deep sedation and general anesthesia are safe in the endoscopy suite. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2004;39:283–286. doi: 10.1080/00365520310008467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Barbi E, Petaros P, Badina L, et al. Deep sedation with propofol for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in children, administered by specially trained pediatricians: a prospective case series with emphasis on side effects. Endoscopy. 2006;38:368–375. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-921194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Coté CJ, Notterman DA, Karl HW, Weinberg JA, McCloskey C. Adverse sedation events in pediatrics: analysis of medications used for sedation. Pediatrics. 2000;106:633–644. doi: 10.1542/peds.106.4.633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Doyle L, Colleti JE. Pediatric procedural sedation and analgesia. Pediatr Clin N Am. 2006;53:279–292. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2005.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Vespasiano M, Finkelstein M, Kurachek S. Propofol Sedation: Intensivists’ Experience With 7304 Cases in a Children’s Hospital. Pediatrics. 2007;120:1411–1417. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Barbi E, Gararduzzi T, Marchetti F, et al. Deep sedation with propofol by nonanaesthesiologists: a prospective pediatric experience. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157:1097–1103. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.11.1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cravero JP, Beach ML, Blike GT, Gallagher SM, Hertzog JH. Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium. The incidence and nature of adverse events during pediatric sedation/anesthesia with propofol for procedures outside the operating room: a report from the Pediatric Seda-tion Research Consortium. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:795–804. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818fc334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Evans RG, Crawford MW, Noseworthy MD, Yoo SJ. Effect of increasing depth of propofol anesthesia on upper airway configuration in children. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:596–602. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200309000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mace SE, Barata IA, Cravero JP, et al. Clinical policy: evidence-based approach to pharmacologic agents used in pediatric sedation and analgesia in the emergency department. J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39:1472–1484. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Crawford MW, Dodgson BG, Holtby HHK, Roy WL. Propofol syndrome in children. CMAJ. 2003;168 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ahlen K, Buckley CJ, Goodale DB, Pulsford AH. The ’propofol infusion syndrome’: the facts, their interpretation and implications for patient care. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006;23:990–998. doi: 10.1017/S0265021506001281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pitetti R, Davis PJ, Redlinger R, et al. Effect on Hospital-Wide Sedation Practices after Implementation of the 2001 JCAHO Procedural Sedation and Analgesia Guidelines. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160:211–216. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.160.2.211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Patel KN, Simon HK, Stockwell CA, et al. Pediatric sedation by a dedicated nonanesthesiologist pediatric sedation service using propofol. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009;25:133–138. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31819a7f75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e1.Johnston CC, Stevens BJ, Boyer K, Porter FL. Development of psychologic responses to pain and assessment of pain in infants and toddlers. In: Schlechter NL, Berde CB, Yaster M, editors. Pain in infants, children, and adolescents. Philadelphia: Lippincott -Williams&Wilkins; 2003. pp. 105–127. [Google Scholar]
  • e2.Goldschneider KR, Anand KS. Long-term consequences of pain in neonates. In: Schlechter NL, Berde CB, Yaster M, editors. Pain in -infants, children, and adolescents. Philadelphia: Lippincott -Williams&Wilkins; 2003. pp. 58–70. [Google Scholar]
  • e3.Herrmann C, Hohmeister J, Demirakca S, Zohsel K, Flor H. Long-term alteration of pain sensitivity in school-aged children with early pain experiences. Pain. 2006;5:278–285. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.08.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e4.Visitainer MA, Wolfer JA. Psychological preparation for surgical pediatric patients: the effect on children’s and parent’s stress -responses and adjustment. Pediatrics. 1975;56:187–202. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e5.Gozal D, Gozal Y. Pediatric sedation/anesthesia outside the operating room. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008;21:494–498. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e3283079b6c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e6.Riphaus A, Wehrmann T, Weber B, et al. S3-Leitlinie „Sedierung in der gastrointestinalen Endoskopie“. Z Gastroenterol. 2008;46:1298–1330. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1027850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e7.Finley GA. Sedation. In: Schechter NL, Schlechter NL, Berde CB, Yaster M, editors. Pain in infants, children, and adolescents. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams&Wilkins; 2003. pp. 563–577. [Google Scholar]
  • e8.O’Donnell JJ, Maurice SC, Beattie TF. Emergency analgesia in the paediatric population. Part III Non-pharmacological measures of pain relief and anxiolysis. Emer Med J. 2002;19:195–197. doi: 10.1136/emj.19.3.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e9.Taddio A, Ohlsson A, Einarson TR, Stevens B, Koren G. A systemic review of lidocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA) in the treatment of acute pain in neonates. Pediatrics. 1998;101 doi: 10.1542/peds.101.2.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e10.Coté CJ, Zaslavsky A, Downes JJ, et al. Postoperative apnea in former preterm infants after inguinal hernioraphy. A combined analysis. Anesthesiology. 1995;82:807–808. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199504000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e11.Lightdale JR, Goldmann DA, Feldman HA, Newburg AR, DiNardo JA, Fox VL. Microstream capnography improves patient monitoring during moderate sedation: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2006;117:1170–1178. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e12.Tobias JD. End-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring during sedation with a combination of midazolam and ketamine for children undergoing painful, invasive procedures. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1999;15:173–175. doi: 10.1097/00006565-199906000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e13.Casati A, Gallioli G, Passaretta R, Scandrogio M, Bignami E, Torri G. End tidal carbon dioxide monitoring in spontaneously breath-ing, non-intubated patients. A clinical comparison between conventional sidestream and microstream capnometers. Minerva -Anesthesiol. 2001;67:161–164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e14.Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Ludomirsky A, Marshall J, Tait AR. Can we improve the assessment of discharge readiness? A comparative study of observational and objective measures of depth of sedation in children. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:218–224. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200402000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e15.American Society of Anesthesiology. Statement on safe use of propofol. www.asahq.org/publicationsAndServices/standards/37.pdf.
  • e16. Rote Liste, 2008, Propofol-1%. [Google Scholar]
  • e17.Carcillo JA. What’s new in pediatric intensive care. Crit Care Med. 2006;34 p.:183–190. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000232492.44019.E6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e18.Bassett KE, Anderson JL, Pribble CG, Guenther E. Propofol for procedural sedation in children in the emergency departement. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;42:773–782. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(03)00619-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e19.Hertzog JH, Cambell JK, Dalton HJ, Hauser GJ. Propofol anesthesia for invasive procedures in ambulatory and hopsitalized children: experience in the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatrics. 1999;103 E30 doi: 10.1542/peds.103.3.e30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e20.Allegaert K. Is propofol the perfect hypnotic for procedural seda-tion in neonates? Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2009;4:84–86. doi: 10.2174/157488409788184927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e21.Booker PD. Intravenous anesthestics. In: Bissonette B, Dalens B, editors. Pediatric Anesthesia: Pinciples & Practice. 1st edition. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001. pp. 237–258. [Google Scholar]
  • e22.Bissonnette B, Luginbuehl I, Marciniak B, Dalens B, editors. Syndromes: Rapid recognition and perioperative Implications. New York: McGraw Hill; 2006. Mitochondrial disease; pp. 556–558. [Google Scholar]
  • e23.Godambe SA, Elliot V, Matheny D, Pershad J. Comparison of propofol/fentanyl versus ketamine/midazolam for brief orthopaedic procedural sedation in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics. 2003;112:116–123. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.1.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e24.Gottschling S, Meyer S, Krenn T, et al. Propofol versus midazolam/ketamine for procedural sedation in pediatric oncology. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2005;27:471–476. doi: 10.1097/01.mph.0000179238.37647.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e25.Vardi A, Salem Y, Padeh S, Paret G, Barzilay Z. Is propofol safe for procedural sedation in children? A prospective evaluation of propofol versus ketamine in pediatric critical care. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:1231–1236. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200206000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e26.Picard P, Trame’r MR. Prevention of Pain on Injection with Propofol: A Quantitative Systematic Review. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:963–969. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200004000-00035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e27.Crawford MW, Rohan D, Macgowan CK, Yoo SJ, Macpherson BA. Effect of propofol anesthesia and continuous positive airway pressure on upper airway size and configuration in infants. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:45–50. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200607000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e28.Muñoz HR, Cortínez LI, Ibacache ME, León PJ. Effect site concentrations of propofol producing hypnosis in children and adults: comparison using the bispectral index. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006;50:882–887. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01062.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e29.Eastwood PR, Platt PR, Shepherd K, Maddison K, Hillman DR. Collapsibility of the upper airway at different concentrations of propofol anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:470–477. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200509000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e30.Sundman E, Witt H, Sandin R, et al. Pharyngeal function and airway protection during subhypnotic concentrations of propofol, isoflurane, and sevoflurane: volunteers examined by pharyngeal videoradiography and simultaneous manometry. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:1125–1132. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200111000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e31.Wappler F. Propofol infusion syndrome: presentation, pathophysiology and therapy of a rare complication [Das Propofol-Infusionssyndrom: Klinik, Pathophysiologie und Therapie einer seltenen Komplikation] Dtsch Arztebl. 2006;103(11):A705–A710. [Google Scholar]
  • e32.Cravens GT, Packer DL, Johnson ME. Incidence of propofol infusion syndrome during noninvasive radiofrequency ablation for -atrial flutter or fibrillation. Anesthesiology. 2007;106:1134–1138. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000265421.40477.a3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e33.Tosun Z, Esmaoglu A, Coruh A. Propofol-ketamine vs. propofol-fentanyl combinations for deeper sedation and analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing burn dressing changes. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008;18:43–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2007.02380.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e34.Willman EV, Andolfatto G. A prospective evaluation of “ketofol” (ketamine/propofol combination) for procedural sedation and -analgesia in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49:23–30. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e35.Slavik VC, Zed PJ. Combination ketamine and propofol for seda-tion and analgesia. Pharmacotherapy. 2007;27:1588–1598. doi: 10.1592/phco.27.11.1588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e36.Von Heijne M, Bredlöv B, Söderhäll S, Olsson GL. Propofol or propofol-alfentanil anesthesia for painful procedures in the pediatric oncology ward. Paediatr Anaesth. 2004;14:670–675. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01279.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e37.Chiaretti A, Ruggiero A, Barone G, et al. Propofol/Alfentanil and propofol/ketamine procedural sedation in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: safety, efficacy, and their correlation with pain neuromediator expression. Eur J Cancer Care. (21 Epub ahead of print.) 2009 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2008.01006.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e38.Hollman GA, Schultz MM, Eickhoff JC, Christenson DK. Propofol-fentanyl versus propofol alone for lumbar puncture sedation in children with acute hematologic malignancies: propofol dosing and adverse events. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008;9:616–622. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31818e3ad3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e39.Practice guideline for sedation and analgesia by non–anesthesiologists. A report by the American Society of Anesthesiologits task force on sedation and analgesia by non–anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology. 1996;84:459–471. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199602000-00029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • e40.Becke K, Giest J, Strauß JM. Handlungsempfehlungen zur präoperativen Diagnostik, Impfabstand und Nüchternheit im Kindes-alter. Anästh Intensivmed. 2007;48 [Google Scholar]

Articles from Deutsches Arzteblatt International are provided here courtesy of Deutscher Arzte-Verlag GmbH

RESOURCES