Skip to main content
Tissue Engineering. Part A logoLink to Tissue Engineering. Part A
. 2009 Dec 15;16(3):961–970. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0429

Anchoring of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor to Surface-Immobilized Heparin on Pancreatic Islets: Implications for Stimulating Islet Angiogenesis

Sanja Cabric 1, Javier Sanchez 1, Ulrika Johansson 1, Rolf Larsson 1,,2, Bo Nilsson 1, Olle Korsgren 1, Peetra U Magnusson 1,
PMCID: PMC2862613  PMID: 20021270

Abstract

In pancreatic islet transplantation, early revascularization is necessary for long-term graft function. We have shown in in vitro and in vivo models that modification with surface-attached heparin protects the islets from acute attack by the innate immune system of the blood following intraportal islet transplantation. In this study, we have investigated the ability of an immobilized conjugate composed of heparin to bind the angiogenic growth factor vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) as a means of attracting endothelial cells (ECs) to induce angiogenesis and revascularization. We analyzed the capacity of VEGF-A to bind to immobilized heparin and how this affected the proliferation and adherence of ECs to both artificial glass surfaces and islets. Quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring and slot-blot demonstrated the binding of VEGF-A to heparin-coated surfaces upon which ECs showed protein-dependent proliferation. Also, ECs cultured on heparin-coated glass surfaces exhibited effects upon focal contacts. Heparinized islets combined with VEGF-A demonstrated unaffected insulin release. Further, covering islets with heparin also increased the adhesion of ECs to the islet surface. Immobilized heparin on the islet surface may be a useful anchor molecule for achieving complete coverage of islets with angiogenic growth factors, ultimately improving islet revascularization and engraftment in pancreatic islet transplantation.

Introduction

Clinical islet transplantation is emerging as an established procedure for treatment of patients with type-1 diabetes. However, in most patients, islets from more than one donor are needed to achieve insulin independence, indicating that only a small fraction of the transplanted islets successfully engraft in the liver after infusion into the portal vein.13 A number of studies have demonstrated that the reestablishment of an appropriate microvascular supply is an essential prerequisite for successful islet engraftment.46

Growth factors, particularly vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), are known to contribute significantly to the vascularization of transplanted islets.711 The VEGF family of homodimeric glycoproteins in humans consists of VEGF-A, -B, -C, -D and placental growth factor. VEGF-A is critical during development as shown by lethality of transgenic mice lacking one allele.12 In hypoxia-driven processes such as angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels by sprouting from preexisting vessels,13 hypoxia-regulated VEGF-A mRNA transcription is increased.14,15 VEGF-A stimulates endothelial cell (EC) permeability and chemotaxis through cognate VEGF receptors (VEGFRs), where VEGFR-2 is the major mediator of the effects of VEGF-A.16,17 VEGF-A is continuously expressed in normal pancreatic islets1820 and at particularly high levels in devascularized and hypoxic pancreatic islets.21,22 Further, underscoring its role in islet biology is the observation that animals lacking specific islet VEGF-A expression in pancreatic islets have continuous, instead of fenestrated capillaries.20,23 The locally expressed VEGF-A is a prerequisite for islet endothelial fenestration, as has been previously shown for other tissues.24,25

We have recently demonstrated in in vitro and in vivo models that modification of pancreatic islets with surface-attached heparin conjugates, consisting of approximately 70 heparin molecules covalently attached to a carrier backbone,26 can protect the islets from acute attack by the innate immune system of the blood after intraportal islet cell transplantation.27 The application of immobilized heparin directly to the islet surface mimics the protective biological activity exerted by heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) at the endothelial lining of the vascular wall and thereby provides protection against innate immune reactions.

Another potentially advantageous feature of heparin in this setting is its capacity to bind angiogenic growth factors, including VEGF-A,16 through the heparin-binding domains. VEGFR-2 is expressed on ECs28,29 and binding of VEGF-A creates dimerization of the receptors leading to activation of intrinsic receptor tyrosine kinase activity.30 The tyrosine kinases stimulate phosphorylation cascades of intracellular proteins which finally lead to effects such as survival, proliferation, and migration of ECs. To become stabilized, the receptors and growth factors must interact with glucosaminoglycans such as HSPGs, which are expressed on the cell surface of the ECs and neighboring cells. HSPGs also act as a reservoir of growth factors on the cell surface.31,32 Heparin, which is a structurally related but more heavily sulfated glucosaminoglycan, can mimic many of the features of the HSPGs.33,34 Indeed, heparin conjugates anchored onto the islet surface may well trigger revascularization processes. A first step in testing this possibility is to investigate the ability of heparin conjugates to bind VEGF-A and attract ECs, thereby inducing angiogenesis and revascularization.

In this study, we have examined the capacity of immobilized heparin conjugate to bind VEGF-A and have assessed its effects upon ECs. We have demonstrated by a variety of techniques that modification of surfaces with immobilized heparin increase the binding of ECs and their proliferation after VEGF stimulation, when compared with results obtained with unmodified surfaces. These results have important implications for improving the survival and function of human pancreatic islets after transplantation.

Materials and Methods

Islet isolation

Human pancreases were obtained within the Nordic Network from diseased donors after appropriate consent for multiorgan donation. The islets were isolated at the Division of Clinical Immunology at the University of Uppsala, using a modification of a previously described semiautomated digestion–filtration method.3537 The purity of islet preparations used in this study ranged from 70% to 95% and 3–14 donors per experiment were used.

Culture of ECs

Human dermal microvascular ECs (PromoCell GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) were cultured using EC growth medium MV with supplement mix (ECGM MV; PromoCell GmbH). The EC used were from passage 3 to 12.

Islet and surface heparinization procedure

Human islets were biotinylated by incubating the islets for 30 min at room temperature (RT) in Connaught Medical Research Laboratories (CMRL; Cellgro, Mediatech, Inc., Manassas, VA) culture medium without serum but containing 1 mg/mL EZ-Link™ Sulfo-NHS-LC-biotin (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL). The islets were washed twice and then incubated for 30 min at 37°C in culture medium supplemented with 1 mg/mL of avidin (Pierce Biotechnology). Finally, macromolecular conjugates of heparin (Corline Systems AB, Uppsala, Sweden) at 1 mg/mL in culture medium were allowed to bind to the biotin/avidin coating for 60 min.

All plates (24-well) used for the thymidine assay and cover glass surfaces used for culture of ECs were preincubated with 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) or 6 μg/mL collagen PureCol (INAMED Biomaterials/Nutacon BV, Leimuiden, The Netherlands) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and thereafter heparinized as described earlier. Sulfated tissue culture plastic was used as control surface, which was prepared by adding 0.2 g/mL KMnO4 dissolved in concentrated H2SO4 and incubated during 2 min of continuous swirling.

Quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring of VEGF-A binding

To monitor the capacity of VEGF-A to bind to immobilized heparin, a quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring (QCM-D) approach (Q-Sense AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) was used.38 This technique relies on the fact that a mass adsorbed onto the sensor surface of a shear-mode oscillating quartz crystal causes a proportional change in its resonance frequency, f. Changes in f reflect the amount of mass deposited onto the surface of the crystal. The corresponding dissipation change, ΔD, indicates frictional (viscous) losses induced by the deposited materials. Sensor crystals (5-MHz) sputtered with stainless steel were used. The crystals were incubated in 2% human albumin (Baxter AG, Vienna, Austria) for 30 min at RT, and heparinization was carried out as described earlier. The final step included binding of human VEGF-A (6.7 μg/mL; PeproTech, London, UK).

Slot-blot assay of VEGF-A binding to heparinized surfaces

VEGF-A (PeproTech) was diluted in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) with 0.1% BSA in the concentrations of 1.5, 3.1, 6.2, 12.5, 25, and 50 ng/mL. A volume of 100 μL VEGF-A in the specified concentrations was added in duplicates to heparinized microtiter wells. VEGF-A solutions were incubated on the heparinized surface for 60 min at RT. Subsequently, the supernatants were collected and the duplicates were pooled into slots of a 48-well slot-blot sandwich dish (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) in which the solutions were bound to a nitrocellulose membrane through vacuum pressure. Samples of 1.5–50 ng/mL VEGF-A in 0.1% BSA/TBS were used as comparative controls (100 μL collected in duplicates) in the slot blots. The nitrocellulose membrane was then blocked in 5% dry milk dissolved in TBS with 0.05% Tween-20 (TBS-T). Immunoblotting was performed by rabbit anti-human VEGF-A antibody (product no. AF-293-NA; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) diluted 1:100 in 5% dry milk in TBS-T and incubated overnight in 4°C. After vigorous washes of the membrane in TBS-T, secondary goat anti-rabbit horse radish peroxidase-conjugated antibody (product no. A4174; Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) diluted 1:2500 in 5% dry milk in TBS-T was incubated for 1 h at RT, followed by vigorous washes in TBS-T. Immunoreactive bands were then visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) (Immobilon Western Chemilum horse radish peroxidase substrate; MilliPore, Billerica, MA). Quantification of blots was performed using Image Gauge ver. 3.3 (FUJI Film Photo, Tokyo, Japan).

Thymidine incorporation assay of EC proliferation

Cell culture plastic was heparinized as described earlier and ECs were analyzed upon interaction with the surface upon seeding and during culture over time.

Heparinized surfaces and control sulfated surfaces were preincubated with VEGF-A (10 ng/24-well; PeproTech) for 1 h at RT, followed by two washes with TBS to remove unanchored VEGF-A. Surfaces without added growth factor were denoted “basal.” The ECs were then plated at 2.5 × 104 cells/well in 1 mL of ECGM MV with 0.5% fetal bovine serum (starvation medium) and cultured for 16 h at 37°C before thymidine incorporation (see below). Soluble VEGF-A (1 ng/mL) was added as indicated upon seeding of cells.

Also, ECs were plated at 2.5 × 104 cells/well in 1 mL of ECGM MV with supplements. After 24 h of culture, the cells were washed once and incubated in starvation medium for another 24 h at 37°C. Cells were stimulated with or without human VEGF-A (20 ng/mL; PeproTech) as indicated and incubated for 16 h at 37°C.

After the 16-h incubation, [3H] thymidine (1 μCi/mL) incorporation was performed for a 4-h incubation period at 37°C. The cells were placed on ice and washed in ice-cold PBS followed by incubation in ice-cold 10% trichloro acetic acid for 20 min and then washed twice in ice-cold 95% ethanol. The precipitated DNA was solubilized in 0.2 M NaOH and the contents of the wells were transferred to scintillation vials; [3H] thymidine incorporation was determined by liquid scintillation counting. Samples were analyzed in triplicate. Representative results are shown with statistics based on four individual experiments.

ECs cultured on heparinized surface

Pieces of cover glass were precoated with 6 μg/mL collagen PureCol (INAMED Biomaterials/Nutacon BV) and then heparinized as described earlier or left untreated. Glasses were incubated for 1 h with VEGF-A (20 ng/mL; PeproTech) and then washed twice with TBS. The cover glasses were placed in a 24-well plate, and 25,000 ECs/well were seeded in ECGM MV with 0.5% FBS. After 24 h, the cells were washed once in ice-cold TBS and fixed in zinc fix (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) for 30 min. Staining of focal adhesions was performed by mouse anti-paxillin antibody (product no. 610052; Becton Dickinson) diluted 1:500, followed by washes in TBS and incubation with Alexa 488-labeled goat anti-mouse highly cross-adsorbed IgG (product no. A-11029; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) diluted 1:1000. Staining of cytoskeletal actin was performed by Texas red-conjugated phalloidin antibody (product no. T7471; Molecular Probes) diluted 1:200. Nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Sigma–Aldrich). Cover glasses were mounted with Fluoromount-G mounting medium (Southern Biotechnology, Birmingham, AL). The results were analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (Zeiss LSM 510 Meta; Carl Zeiss AG, Göttingen, Germany).

Confocal microscopy analysis of human islets after incubation with VEGF-A

The binding of VEGF-A to the surface of heparinized or untreated control islets was analyzed after incubating the islets at RT for 60 min with human VEGF-A (2 ng/mL, PeproTech) fluorescently labeled using Alexa Fluor 488 Protein Labelling Kit (Molecular Probes). Images were acquired by confocal laser scanning microscopy (Zeiss LSM 510 Meta; Carl Zeiss AG).

Insulin release analysis by dynamic perifusion system

Insulin secretion in response to glucose stimulation in a dynamic perifusion system was assessed as previously described39 at 24 h after heparinization. Islets were initially perifused with 1.67 mmol/L glucose, thereafter with 16.7 mmol/L, and finally again with 1.67 mmol/L glucose. During the 120-min perifusion, fractions were collected at 6-min intervals. The concentration of insulin was analyzed using a commercial ELISA kit (Mercodia, Uppsala, Sweden).

Cell labeling

ECs were labeled with Cell Tracker™ Orange CMRA (CT Orange; Molecular Probes) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The cells were incubated at 37°C for 60 min and then washed two times in PBS to remove excess dye.

EC coating of islets of Langerhans

Heparinized or unmodified control human islets were prepared as described earlier. After the heparinization process, the islets (heparinized and control islets) were also incubated with 20 ng/mL of VEGF-A in CMRL medium without serum for 1 h at RT, followed by two washes with CMRL medium. Thereafter the islets were mixed together with 1.2 × 105 CT Orange-labeled EC in 500 μL ECGM MV culture medium according to a previously established method.40 The EC-coated islets were transferred to petri dishes, treated to prevent cellular adherence, and cultured for 24–48 h in ECGM MV culture medium. The EC coating of islets was examined using confocal laser scanning microscopy (Zeiss LSM 510 Meta). The relative value of the surface coating between untreated and treated islets as indicated was quantified using the Leica QW software (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Prism 5.0 (Graph Pad, La Jolla, CA). Data are presented as means ± standard error of the mean. Mean values were compared using a two-tailed Wilcoxon test or two-tailed t-test for paired data. Significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.

Results

QCM-D analysis of the binding of VEGF-A to heparin surface

Figure 1 shows the sequential binding of biotin, avidin, heparin complexes, and VEGF-A as analyzed by QCM-D. The mass adsorbed onto the oscillating sensor surface causes a proportional change in its resonance frequency, f (blue line). The corresponding dissipation change, ΔD, is indicated by the purple line. The changes in frequency reflect the amount of mass deposited onto the sensor surface. Because of its low molecular weight, binding of biotin resulted in a low frequency shift, followed by a rapid frequency increase reflecting the buffer exchange. Binding of avidin to biotin was found to occur with an obvious change in Δ but no change in ΔD, indicating a rigid binding, whereas binding of the heparin conjugates to avidin resulted in a distinct change in both ΔD and Δf, indicating a more loose and flexible structure. Binding of VEGF-A to the final heparin surface was shown to occur with a distinct change in both Δf and ΔD.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring analysis of growth factor binding to an immobilized heparin conjugate. The polystyrene surface, used as a proxy for the islet surface, was initially coated with albumin to create a matrix to which biotin could bind. Biotin binding was followed by sequential addition of avidin, heparin conjugate, and finally vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A). For each step at which an increased mass (= binding) was added to the sensor, a corresponding dampening of the frequency was obtained (f, blue line). The corresponding dissipation change, ΔD, is indicated by purple line. Binding of VEGF-A to the final heparin surface produced a distinct change in both Δf and ΔD.

Binding of VEGF-A to heparinized surfaces as analyzed by slot-blot

To investigate the quantitative capacity of the heparinized surface to bind VEGF-A, increasing amount of VEGF-A (1.5–50 ng/mL) was incubated on the heparinized surfaces. The amount of VEGF-A remaining in the supernatants after 1 h of incubation at RT was analyzed by slot-blot (Fig. 2A). Incubation of VEGF-A on heparinized surface resulted in binding of the growth factor to the heparin conjugate (consumption), reaching a maximum binding at approximately 0.3–0.6 ng/cm2. The result was quantified by image analysis showing 100% loss of VEGF-A in the supernatant at the concentration of 0.3 ng/cm2 and approximately 40% remaining in the supernatant at 0.6 ng/cm2 (Fig. 2B).

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Binding of VEGF-A to heparinized surfaces and analyses of proliferation. (A) The amount of added VEGF-A (0.1–5 ng) remaining in solution after incubation on heparinized surfaces (heparin) or in control tubes (control) was assessed by slot-blot. (B) Quantification of VEGF-A in slot-blot. (C) Proliferation by thymidine incorporation (counts per minute) of endothelial cell (EC) seeded in starvation medium (basal) onto heparinized surfaces (bovine serum albumin [BSA] or collagen protein base) preincubated with VEGF-A (VEGFpre) or in the presence of soluble VEGF-A (VEGFs, 1 ng/mL); n = 4, *p ≤ 0.05, t-test. The relevant mean counts per minute values of four individual experiments were BSA–heparin basal, 476 ± 83; BSA–heparin VEGFpre, 975 ± 208; collagen–heparin basal, 1469 ± 205; collagen–heparin VEGFpre, 2642 ± 274; or sulfate basal, 785 ± 90; sulfate VEGFpre, 924 ± 157. (D) ECs cultured over time before stimulation with added VEGF-A after 24 h of starvation. Sulfated surfaces were used as control surface with negatively charged sulfate groups.

Proliferation of ECs cultured on untreated and heparinized surfaces

To investigate the capacity of ECs to respond to VEGF-A anchored to heparinized surfaces, the ECs were seeded in starvation medium in a 24-well plate. The amount of bound VEGF-A to the heparinized surfaces was verified by similar proliferation capacity in comparison to the proliferation of ECs in the presence of soluble VEGF-A (1 ng/mL) added in the culture supernatant upon seeding of ECs (Fig. 2C). The control sulfated surface preincubated with VEGF-A showed unaffected effects upon the seeded ECs in comparison to basal, indicating very low binding of VEGF-A (Fig. 2C). At basal conditions the proliferation of ECs on heparinized surface was reduced when BSA was used as protein surface compared with collagen. The sulfated surface used as a control surface of negatively charged sulfate groups showed only a slightly lower proliferation than the collagen–heparin surface (Fig. 2C). In the experiment where ECs were let to bind to the heparinized surface in the presence of complete EC medium followed by starvation and stimulation, VEGF-A added in solution (20 ng/mL) showed similar capacity to stimulate proliferation in all three conditions but still an affected proliferation was seen in basal medium comparable to the seeding experiment (Fig. 2D).

Morphology analysis of ECs on heparinized surfaces

Morphological analyses of ECs cultured on glass surfaces were performed by staining for stress fibers and focal adhesions. Six hours after seeding, an obvious difference in adherence was seen. ECs cultured on heparinized surfaces spread more rapidly compared with untreated surfaces (Fig. 3A). ECs were also seeded on either control or collagen-heparinized glass slides preincubated with VEGF-A (Fig. 3B, C). After 24 h, it appeared that ECs on the control glass surface (Fig. 3B) showed dense focal adhesions (paxillin; green) in the periphery of the cells in comparison to ECs on heparinized surface (Fig. 3C) where the paxillin-positive proteins formed fibrillar adhesions along the phalloidin-positive (red) cytoskeleton. This phenomenon of fibrillar adhesions was also seen on the heparinized surface in the absence of VEGF-A, but to a lower degree (data not shown). The panels to the far right in Figure 3B and C show detailed enlargement of the focal and fibrillar adhesions, respectively.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Morphology analyses of ECs cultured on heparinized and untreated surfaces. (A) Induced adherence of ECs toward heparin-coated surface was shown at 6 h after seeding of cells compared with control. The formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions was assessed in ECs after 24 h of culture on untreated glass surfaces or collagen–heparin-coated glass surfaces preincubated with VEGF-A. Stress fibers were visualized with phalloidin (red) and focal adhesions with paxillin (green). Paxillin was localized as dense focal adhesions on control surfaces (B, arrow heads) and along the cytoskeleton in fibrillar adhesions on collagen–heparin surfaces (C, asterisks). Nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (blue). Scale bars = 20 μm. The pictures to the far right in (B) and (C) are high-magnification images of the focal and fibrillar adhesions, respectively.

Binding of VEGF-A to the islet surface and functionality analysis of heparinized islets

Confocal microscopy was used to verify the binding of VEGF-A to the surface of human islets. This technique revealed successful binding of VEGF-A to the surface of heparinized islets (Fig. 4B). VEGF-A binding to the surface of control islets could not be detected (Fig. 4A). Heparinized islets in the presence or absence of VEGF-A and untreated control islets from three islet preparations responded similarly to glucose stimulation, demonstrating that the normal biphasic insulin secretion was not affected by the heparinization procedure or VEGF-A treatment (Fig. 4C).

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Binding of VEGF-A to human islets and analysis of insulin release. Alexa Flour 488-labeled VEGF-A (green) was incubated with control (A) and heparinized (B) human islets and then examined by confocal microscopy. Nuclei were stained by 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (blue). Scale bars = 100 μm. (C) Insulin release from control (closed diamonds), heparinized (closed squares), and heparinized islet with VEGF-A (closed triangles) cultured for 24 h (n = 3). The islets were sequentially stimulated with 1.67, 16.7, and 1.67 mmol/L of glucose. The mean ± standard error of the mean is shown.

Improved coating of islets with EC after heparinization

Quantification of confocal microscopy analysis revealed that islets with heparin conjugate were associated with a threefold increased adhesion of ECs in comparison to nonheparinized islets (Fig. 5A) after 24 h of culture. The average islet surface area coated by ECs after 24 h was 12.2% ± 3.4% for control islets and 36.2% ± 10.9% for heparinized islets. After 2 days of culture, the proportion of coating between control and heparinized islets was maintained and the ECs on heparinized islets were also elongated on the islet surface compared with control (Fig. 5A). EC coverage of heparinized islets preincubated with VEGF-A was further increased approximately 1.5-fold compared with immobilized heparin alone (Fig. 5B); this effect was absent in control islets (Fig. 5C).

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5.

Coating of pancreatic islets by ECs. (A) Quantification of EC coating of islets showed a significant threefold increase in adherence upon immobilized heparin compared with untreated control islets after 24 h of culture (n = 14, **p = 0.008, Wilcoxon test). Confocal stacking images, combined with bright-field microscopy, after 2 days of culture showed that the coating was maintained and elongated characteristics of ECs on heparin-coated islets were observed compared with control. Scale bars = 100 μm. EC coating was further increased in heparinized islets preincubated with VEGF-A (B, n = 7, *p = 0.03, Wilcoxon test), an effect absent in control islets precoated with VEGF-A (C, n = 6–7, p = 0.1486, Wilcoxon test).

Discussion

In this study, we have demonstrated the binding of VEGF-A to immobilized macromolecular conjugates of heparin on artificial surfaces and islets of Langerhans to investigate the effects of binding with respect to promoting angiogenesis. The capacity of VEGF-A to bind the heparinized surface showed in slot-blot an approximate saturation of bound VEGF-A at 0.3–0.6 ng/cm2. Our group has previously established an approach for improving islet revascularization by coating islets with ECs.40,41 In this study, we questioned whether the EC coating efficiency could be affected by VEGF-A anchored to the surface of heparinized islets. Confocal microscopy of the islets revealed significant increased adhesion of ECs to the surface of heparinized islets, an effect that was further improved when heparinized islets were preincubated with VEGF-A. Preincubation of control islets with VEGF-A created no additional effect upon coating. These results indicate the possibility of anchoring growth factors with affinity for heparin on biological surfaces coated with immobilized heparin. This can be implicated in several areas where a defined surface would be beneficial.

Stimulation of ECs on the heparinized surfaces with VEGF-A was evaluated in two experimental setups: exposure to bound VEGF-A upon seeding of cells or VEGF-A in solution. Anchored VEGF-A to the immobilized heparin could symbolize a scenario where migrating ECs are exposed to surfaces such as heparinized islets or heparinized biomaterials with bound growth factor, whereas VEGF-A in solution would represent tissue-secreted VEGF-A. The ECs seeded on heparinized surfaces preincubated with VEGF-A showed strong response toward the anchored growth factor. It is interesting to speculate about the accessibility of the growth factor in the presence of heparin as ECs seeded on the sulfated surface failed to respond to VEGF-A in solution. Over time, the cells on sulfated surface could equally well respond to VEGF-A in solution as in comparison to heparinized surfaces. This indicates that the heparinized surface can clearly bind VEGF-A and create a rapid stimulation of ECs upon interaction compared with control surface.

Further, ECs seeded on heparinized surfaces in the presence of anchored VEGF-A showed affected focal contacts. In comparison to control surfaces preincubated with VEGF-A in which the ECs formed dense focal adhesions in the periphery of the cell surfaces, ECs on the heparinized surface with anchored VEGF-A expressed paxillin-positive fibrillar adhesions, dot-like spots, along the cytoskeleton. Fibroblasts expressing focal adhesions are less prone to migrate in comparison to cells forming fibrillar adhesions.42 Migration is tightly linked to proliferation and the formation of fibrillar adhesions on heparinized surfaces even in the absence of VEGF-A fits well with the increased proliferation of ECs seeded on the collagen–heparin surface compared with control. Heparin has also the capacity to affect the three-dimensional structure of proteins such as fibronectin. In recent studies by Mitsi et al.,43,44 it was shown that the capacity of VEGF to interact with fibronectin was enhanced by heparin through conformational changes in VEGF-binding sites of fibronectin. ECs produce fibronectin,45 which might directly interact with the heparinized surface and with anchored VEGF-A.

It was shown that heparinization on a BSA-coated surface affected ECs with reduced proliferation in the absence of VEGF-A, whereas collagen as the protein base for heparinization improved EC proliferation in basal conditions compared with control. The control surface in our study was sulfated plastic surface,46 creating negatively charged sulfate groups lacking specificity in growth factor binding. This finding of reduced proliferation on BSA–heparin surface is consistent with a study by Letourneur et al., who demonstrated that immobilized heparin on polysaccharide gel matrices inhibits the growth of EC in vitro,47 as has previously been shown for immobilized heparin on other matrices.48,49 Also, BSA is a more EC inert protein compared with collagen. Further, the matrix-dependent variations in proliferation toward VEGF-A may be due to differential regulation of receptors and proteins involved in EC contact regulation such as VEGFR-2, integrins, and focal adhesion kinase, which are strongly phosphorylated in the presence of VEGF-A.50

Several studies have previously demonstrated improved islet graft revascularization in response to the production of recombinant VEGF-A within the islets.8,9 However, unlike other pretreatment procedures for introducing VEGF-A to the islets, such as gene therapy,8,9,51 anchoring VEGF-A directly to immobilized heparin on the islet surface should not be associated with an increased risk of inducing adverse effects on islet function52,53 or adaptive immune responses. Importantly, islet functionality was not affected by anchoring of VEGF-A in this study because the growth factor in combination with immobilized heparin did not affect insulin release in response to a glucose challenge. Treatment of cultured mouse islets with VEGF-A or fibroblast growth factor-2 has been shown insufficient to rescue the islet vasculature54; thus, it appears that simple exposure of cultured islets to growth factors is not sufficient. However, our data support the hypothesis that immobilization of heparin directly on the islet surface might enhance the effect on ECs, because heparin is important for growth factor storage and stabilization of receptor complexes during angiogenesis. The possible rescue effect upon islet vasculature in cultured human islets due to exogenously added VEGF-A remains to be investigated.

Taken together, immobilization of a heparin conjugate decorated with growth factors on islets has a favorable attraction on EC adherence and migration, functions which are important for angiogenic processes after transplantation. The approach presented could improve islet engraftment and survival after implantation, especially at extrahepatic transplantation sites where a rapid supply of nutrients and oxygen is required.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from Barndiabetesfonden, the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, the Novo Nordisk Foundation, the National Institutes of Health (U01AI065192), the Swedish Board of Agriculture (31-6965/08), the Swedish Diabetes Association, the Swedish Research Council (70287302), and the Swedish Research Council/Vinnova/SSF (60761701). The authors thank Margareta Engkvist for her excellent technical assistance, the islet isolation team for human islet preparations, and Dr. Deborah McClellan for editing the text.

Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interest exists.

References

  • 1.Ryan E.A. Paty B.W. Senior P.A. Bigam D. Alfadhli E. Kneteman N.M. Lakey J.R. Shapiro A.M. Five-year follow-up after clinical islet transplantation. Diabetes. 2005;54:2060. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.7.2060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rother K.I. Harlan DM. Challenges facing islet transplantation for the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest. 2004;114:877. doi: 10.1172/JCI23235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shapiro A.M. Ricordi C. Hering B.J. Auchincloss H. Lindblad R. Robertson R.P. Secchi A. Brendel M.D. Berney T. Brennan D.C. Cagliero E. Alejandro R. Ryan E.A. DiMercurio B. Morel P. Polonsky K.S. Reems J.A. Bretzel R.G. Bertuzzi F. Froud T. Kandaswamy R. Sutherland D.E. Eisenbarth G. Segal M. Preiksaitis J. Korbutt G.S. Barton F.B. Viviano L. Seyfert-Margolis V. Bluestone J. Lakey J.R. International trial of the Edmonton protocol for islet transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1318. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jansson L. Carlsson P.O. Graft vascular function after transplantation of pancreatic islets. Diabetologia. 2002;45:749. doi: 10.1007/s00125-002-0827-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mattsson G. Jansson L. Carlsson P.O. Decreased vascular density in mouse pancreatic islets after transplantation. Diabetes. 2002;51:1362. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.5.1362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Carlsson P.O. Palm F. Andersson A. Liss P. Markedly decreased oxygen tension in transplanted rat pancreatic islets irrespective of the implantation site. Diabetes. 2001;50:489. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.50.3.489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stagner J.I. Samols E. Induction of angiogenesis by growth factors: relevance to pancreatic islet transplantation. EXS. 1992;61:381. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-7001-6_61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhang N. Richter A. Suriawinata J. Harbaran S. Altomonte J. Cong L. Zhang H. Song K. Meseck M. Bromberg J. Dong H. Elevated vascular endothelial growth factor production in islets improves islet graft vascularization. Diabetes. 2004;53:963. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.4.963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lai Y. Schneider D. Kidszun A. Hauck-Schmalenberger I. Breier G. Brandhorst D. Brandhorst H. Iken M. Brendel M.D. Bretzel R.G. Linn T. Vascular endothelial growth factor increases functional beta-cell mass by improvement of angiogenesis of isolated human and murine pancreatic islets. Transplantation. 2005;79:1530. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000163506.40189.65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hayek A. Lopez A.D. Beattie G.M. Angiogenic peptides in pancreatic islet transplantation to diabetic rats. Transplantation. 1990;50:931. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199012000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hayek A. Beattie G.M. Lopez A.D. Chen P. The use of digital image processing to quantitate angiogenesis induced by basic fibroblast growth factor and transplanted pancreatic islets. Microvasc Res. 1991;41:203. doi: 10.1016/0026-2862(91)90022-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Carmeliet P. Ferreira V. Breier G. Pollefeyt S. Kieckens L. Gertsenstein M. Fahrig M. Vandenhoeck A. Harpal K. Eberhardt C. Declercq C. Pawling J. Moons L. Collen D. Risau W. Nagy A. Abnormal blood vessel development and lethality in embryos lacking a single VEGF allele. Nature. 1996;380:435. doi: 10.1038/380435a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Risau W. Mechanisms of angiogenesis. Nature. 1997;386:671. doi: 10.1038/386671a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shweiki D. Itin A. Soffer D. Keshet E. Vascular endothelial growth factor induced by hypoxia may mediate hypoxia-initiated angiogenesis. Nature. 1992;359:843. doi: 10.1038/359843a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Forsythe J.A. Jiang B.H. Iyer N.V. Agani F. Leung S.W. Koos R.D. Semenza G.L. Activation of vascular endothelial growth factor gene transcription by hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16:4604. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.9.4604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ferrara N. Gerber H.P. LeCouter J. The biology of VEGF and its receptors. Nat Med. 2003;9:669. doi: 10.1038/nm0603-669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Leung D.W. Cachianes G. Kuang W.J. Goeddel D.V. Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor is a secreted angiogenic mitogen. Science. 1989;246:1306. doi: 10.1126/science.2479986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kuroda M. Oka T. Oka Y. Yamochi T. Ohtsubo K. Mori S. Watanabe T. Machinami R. Ohnishi S. Colocalization of vascular endothelial growth factor (vascular permeability factor) and insulin in pancreatic islet cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80:3196. doi: 10.1210/jcem.80.11.7593426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Christofori G. Naik P. Hanahan D. Vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors, flt-1 and flk-1, are expressed in normal pancreatic islets and throughout islet cell tumorigenesis. Mol Endocrinol. 1995;9:1760. doi: 10.1210/mend.9.12.8614412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Inoue M. Hager J.H. Ferrara N. Gerber H.P. Hanahan D. VEGF-A has a critical, nonredundant role in angiogenic switching and pancreatic beta cell carcinogenesis. Cancer Cell. 2002;1:193. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(02)00031-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gorden D.L. Mandriota S.J. Montesano R. Orci L. Pepper M.S. Vascular endothelial growth factor is increased in devascularized rat islets of Langerhans in vitro. Transplantation. 1997;63:436. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199702150-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Vasir B. Aiello L.P. Yoon K.H. Quickel R.R. Bonner-Weir S. Weir G.C. Hypoxia induces vascular endothelial growth factor gene and protein expression in cultured rat islet cells. Diabetes. 1998;47:1894. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.47.12.1894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lammert E. Gu G. McLaughlin M. Brown D. Brekken R. Murtaugh L.C. Gerber H.P. Ferrara N. Melton D.A. Role of VEGF-A in vascularization of pancreatic islets. Curr Biol. 2003;13:1070. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00378-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lukinius A. Jansson L. Korsgren O. Ultrastructural evidence for blood microvessels devoid of an endothelial cell lining in transplanted pancreatic islets. Am J Pathol. 1995;146:429. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Roberts W.G. Palade G.E. Increased microvascular permeability and endothelial fenestration induced by vascular endothelial growth factor. J Cell Sci. 1995;108:2369. doi: 10.1242/jcs.108.6.2369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kristensen E.M. Rensmo H. Larsson R. Siegbahn H. Characterization of heparin surfaces using photoelectron spectroscopy and quartz crystal microbalance. Biomaterials. 2003;24:4153. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00297-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cabric S. Sanchez J. Lundgren T. Foss A. Felldin M. Kallen R. Salmela K. Tibell A. Tufveson G. Larsson R. Korsgren O. Nilsson B. Islet surface heparinization prevents the instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction in islet transplantation. Diabetes. 2007;56:2008. doi: 10.2337/db07-0358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Magnusson P.U. Ronca R. Dell'Era P. Carlstedt P. Jakobsson L. Partanen J. Dimberg A. Claesson-Welsh L. Fibroblast growth factor receptor-1 expression is required for hematopoietic but not endothelial cell development. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25:944. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000163182.73190.f9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Neufeld G. Cohen T. Gengrinovitch S. Poltorak Z. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors. FASEB J. 1999;13:9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cross M.J. Claesson-Welsh L. FGF and VEGF function in angiogenesis: signalling pathways, biological responses and therapeutic inhibition. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2001;22:201. doi: 10.1016/s0165-6147(00)01676-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Flaumenhaft R. Moscatelli D. Saksela O. Rifkin D.B. Role of extracellular matrix in the action of basic fibroblast growth factor: matrix as a source of growth factor for long-term stimulation of plasminogen activator production and DNA synthesis. J Cell Physiol. 1989;140:75. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041400110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rapraeger A.C. Krufka A. Olwin B.B. Requirement of heparan sulfate for bFGF-mediated fibroblast growth and myoblast differentiation. Science. 1991;252:1705. doi: 10.1126/science.1646484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Salmivirta M. Lidholt K. Lindahl U. Heparan sulfate: a piece of information. FASEB J. 1996;10:1270. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.10.11.8836040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Casu B. Lindahl U. Structure and biological interactions of heparin and heparan sulfate. Adv Carbohydr Chem Biochem. 2001;57:159. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2318(01)57017-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Brandhorst H. Brandhorst D. Brendel M.D. Hering B.J. Bretzel R.G. Assessment of intracellular insulin content during all steps of human islet isolation procedure. Cell Transplant. 1998;7:489. doi: 10.1177/096368979800700508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ricordi C. Lacy P.E. Scharp D.W. Automated islet isolation from human pancreas. Diabetes. 1989;38:140. doi: 10.2337/diab.38.1.s140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lakey J.R. Warnock G.L. Shapiro A.M. Korbutt G.S. Ao Z. Kneteman N.M. Rajotte R.V. Intraductal collagenase delivery into the human pancreas using syringe loading or controlled perfusion. Cell Transplant. 1999;8:285. doi: 10.1177/096368979900800309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Andersson J. Sanchez J. Ekdahl K.N. Elgue G. Nilsson B. Larsson R. Optimal heparin surface concentration and antithrombin binding capacity as evaluated with human non-anticoagulated blood in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res. 2003;67:458. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.10104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Goto M. Eich T.M. Felldin M. Foss A. Kallen R. Salmela K. Tibell A. Tufveson G. Fujimori K. Engkvist M. Korsgren O. Refinement of the automated method for human islet isolation and presentation of a closed system for in vitro islet culture. Transplantation. 2004;78:1367. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000140882.53773.dc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Johansson U. Rasmusson I. Niclou S.P. Forslund N. Gustavsson L. Nilsson B. Korsgren O. Magnusson P.U. Formation of composite endothelial cell-mesenchymal stem cell islets: a novel approach to promote islet revascularization. Diabetes. 2008;57:2393. doi: 10.2337/db07-0981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Johansson U. Elgue G. Nilsson B. Korsgren O. Composite islet-endothelial cell grafts: a novel approach to counteract innate immunity in islet transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:2632. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01076.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Faucheux N. Tzoneva R. Nagel M.D. Groth T. The dependence of fibrillar adhesions in human fibroblasts on substratum chemistry. Biomaterials. 2006;27:234. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mitsi M. Forsten-Williams K. Gopalakrishnan M. Nugent M.A. A catalytic role of heparin within the extracellular matrix. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:34796. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M806692200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mitsi M. Hong Z. Costello C.E. Nugent M.A. Heparin-mediated conformational changes in fibronectin expose vascular endothelial growth factor binding sites. Biochemistry. 2006;45:10319. doi: 10.1021/bi060974p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Daramola O.A. Heyderman R.S. Klein N.J. Shennan G.I. Levin M. Detection of fibronectin expression by human endothelial cells using a enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA): enzymatic degradation by activated plasminogen. J Immunol Methods. 1997;202:67. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1759(96)00237-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Larsson R. Eriksson J.C. Lagergren H. Olsson P. Platelet and plasma coagulation compatibility of heparinized and sulphated surfaces. Thromb Res. 1979;15:157. doi: 10.1016/0049-3848(79)90061-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Letourneur D. Machy D. Pelle A. Marcon-Bachari E. D'Angelo G. Vogel M. Chaubet F. Michel J.B. Heparin and non-heparin-like dextrans differentially modulate endothelial cell proliferation: in vitro evaluation with soluble and crosslinked polysaccharide matrices. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;60:94. doi: 10.1002/jbm.10072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Nojiri C. Noishiki Y. Koyanagi H. Aorta-coronary bypass grafting with heparinized vascular grafts in dogs. A preliminary study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1987;93:867. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chupa J.M. Foster A.M. Sumner S.R. Madihally S.V. Matthew H.W. Vascular cell responses to polysaccharide materials: in vitro and in vivo evaluations. Biomaterials. 2000;21:2315. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00158-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wu M.H. Guo M. Yuan S.Y. Granger H.J. Focal adhesion kinase mediates porcine venular hyperpermeability elicited by vascular endothelial growth factor. J Physiol. 2003;552:691. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.048405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Narang A.S. Cheng K. Henry J. Zhang C. Sabek O. Fraga D. Kotb M. Gaber A.O. Mahato R.I. Vascular endothelial growth factor gene delivery for revascularization in transplanted human islets. Pharm Res. 2004;21:15. doi: 10.1023/b:pham.0000012147.52900.b8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Cabric S. Elgue G. Nilsson B. Korsgren O. Schmidt P. Adenovirus-mediated expression of the anticoagulant hirudin in human islets: a tool to make the islets biocompatible to blood. Cell Transplant. 2006;15:759. doi: 10.3727/000000006783464390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zhang N. Schroppel B. Chen D. Fu S. Hudkins K.L. Zhang H. Murphy B.M. Sung R.S. Bromberg J.S. Adenovirus transduction induces expression of multiple chemokines and chemokine receptors in murine beta cells and pancreatic islets. Am J Transplant. 2003;3:1230. doi: 10.1046/j.1600-6143.2003.00215.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Olsson R. Maxhuni A. Carlsson P.O. Revascularization of transplanted pancreatic islets following culture with stimulators of angiogenesis. Transplantation. 2006;82:340. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000229418.60236.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tissue Engineering. Part A are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

RESOURCES