Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 7.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2010 May 7;12(9):1960–1963. doi: 10.1021/ol100378t

Chiral Phosphoric Acid-Catalyzed Addition of Dihydropyrans to N-Acyl Imines: Stereocontrolled Access to Enantioenriched Spirocyclic Oxazoletetrahydropyrans with Three Contiguous Stereocenters

Guiong Li †,, Matthew J Kaplan , Lukasz Wojtas §, Jon C Antilla †,*
PMCID: PMC2863994  NIHMSID: NIHMS193603  PMID: 20361794

Abstract

graphic file with name nihms193603u1.jpg

Dihydropyran derivatives readily undergo addition to N-acyl imines in the presence of chiral Phosphoric acids. This addition process yields an attractive product that is capable of a tandem oxidative-cyclization via an epoxide intermediate.


Chiral Brønsted acids have been shown as highly effective catalysts for stereocontrolled additions to imines.1 The use of N-acyl imines, in particular, has been a very successful substrate for activation by chiral phosphoric acid (PA) based catalysis.2 As part of our ongoing efforts in the chiral PA activation of N-acyl electrophiles,3 we have been continually interested in establishing new stereocontrolled C-C bond forming reactions. During the course of our investigation into the use of dihydropyran (DHP) as a substrate for aza-Diels-Alder4 chemistry, a report by Mead and coworkers5 described the achiral Mannich-type addition of DHP and derivatives to N-acyl imines catalyzed by trifluoroacetic acid or BF3-OEt2. Concurrent with the Mead study, we observed that the chiral PA-catalyzed reaction of DHP with N-acyl imine 1 also provided the direct Mannich product, rather than the [4+2] adduct (Scheme 1). We were excited because the addition, if rendered highly enantioselective, would have the following unique features: a) it is a relatively novel carbon-carbon bond forming reaction, which could provide synthetically useful chiral allyl amines (or amides); b) functionalized chiral dihydropyran derivatives, are found in numerous bioactive natural products and compounds with medicinal interest.6 We report herein, to the best of our knowledge, the first catalytic asymmetric addition of DHP derivatives to N-acyl imines, together with interesting examples of the potential synthetic utilization of this reaction.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

DHP addition to imine resulting in a Mannich type product

We initiated our studies with VAPOL phosphoric acid3a (5 mol % catalyst loading) as the catalyst, and toluene as the solvent. The reaction was run at room temperature and yielded the addition product in 45% yield and 37% ee. This result encouraged us to further explore the reaction conditions. Catalyst screening showed that (R)-TRIP-PA7 gave the best result in terms of enantioselectivity and yield. Therefore, (R)-TRIP-PA was used to evaluate the effect of solvent on the reaction. As shown in Table 1, coordinating solvents such as THF and ether (entries 3and 5) gave poor results. Chloroform provided the best yield at 85% and ee at 71% (entry 8).

Table 1.

Optimization of Reaction Conditions

graphic file with name nihms193603u2.jpg
entrya R solvent PA, mol% temp, °C time, h yield, %b ee, %c
1 Ph toluene 5 rt 20 61 64
2 Ph DCM 5 rt 20 64 33
3 Ph THF 5 rt 20 nd na
4 Ph EtOAc 5 rt 20 24 54
5 Ph ether 5 rt 20 nd na
6 Ph DCE 5 rt 20 48 28
7 Ph hexane 5 rt 20 79 60
8 Ph CHCl3 5 rt 24 85 71
9 Ph CHCl3 5 −20 48 <10 40
10 Ph CHCl3 5 50 18 31 64
11 3,5-MeOC6H3 CHCl3 5 rt 26 80 72
12 2-MeC6H4 CHCl3 5 rt 21 73 72
13 4-MeC6H4 CHCl3 5 rt 21 90 83
14 4-MeOC6H4 CHCl3 5 rt 21 82 85
15 4-MeOC6H4 CHCl3 2 rt 24 98 85
16 4-MeOC6H4 CHCl3 1 rt 24 78 81
17 4-Me2NC6H4 CHCl3 2 rt 24 76 89
a

Molar ratio of 1/2 = 1.0/1.0 equiv;

b

4 Å MS were added in entries 8, 11–17;

c

Isolated yields;

d

ee determined by chiral HPLC.

Decreasing the temperature lowered the yield and ee dramatically (entry 9). Increasing the temperature to 50°C afforded a lower yield of the major product, due in part to the formation of more side products, while providing only modest ee. We then turned our attention to the effect of different substituents on the phenyl ring of the benzoyl group. As shown in Table 1, introduction of a methoxy or methyl group in the ortho or meta positions of the phenyl ring did not induce a positive effect (entries 11–12). However, to our delight, the same substituent groups in the para position gave significant improvement on yield and ee (entries 13–14; 83% ee and 85% ee, respectively). In addition, the catalyst loading could be decreased to 2 mol %, providing an even higher yield (98%) without compromising the enantioselectivity (entry 15). Furthermore, a N,N-dimethylamino substituted N-acyl imine substrate provided the highest enantioselectivity, up to 89% (entry 17), presumably due to increased steric hindrance at the para- position. The N,N-dimethylamino substituted N-acyl group has been removed, as demonstrated by Terada et. al.8

Once the optimized conditions were established, the substrate scope of the asymmetric addition of DHP to N-acyl imine derivatives was studied. This reaction is tolerant of a variety of N-acyl imines (1a–1h). For example, the addition of imines bearing electron-withdrawing groups (p-chloro, 1b; entry 2; p-bromo, 1c; entry 3) gave very high yield and excellent enantioselectivity, up to 90%. An example of an N-acylimine with an electron-donating group, such as para-methyl, also allowed for a good yield and 90% ee (entry 5). However, a strong electron-donating substituent had a negative effect on the ee (78% ee, entry 6). Additionally, the imines with methoxy (76% ee, entry 6) and fluoro (91% ee, entry 7) substituents on the meta position provided similar results in comparison to their para counterparts. We were pleased to find the reaction general for various DHP derivatives.

As shown in Table 2, the reaction of DHP derivative 2b, bearing an n-propyl group, afforded up to 92% yield and 92% ee. The DHP derivatives with larger steric hindrance and longer alkyl chain groups, such as reactants 2c and 2d, also gave high enantioselectivities (90% and 89%, entries 10 and 11, respectively). Finally, the DHP derivative with methoxyethyl substitution produced a lower ee (81%, entry 13), presumably due to the possible coordination of the ether to the phosphoric acid catalyst.

Table 2.

Substrate Scope

graphic file with name nihms193603u3.jpg
entrya R1 (1) R2 (2) time, h product(3) yield, %b ee, %c
1d Ph (1a) H (2a) 21 3aa 76 89
2 p-ClC6H4 (1b) H (2a) 24 3ba 90 90
3 p-BrC6H4 (1c) H (2a) 39 3ca 94 90(S)e
4 p-FC6H4 (1d) H (2a) 25 3da 88 89
5 p-CH3C6H4 (1e) H (2a) 21 3ea 80 90
6 p-CH3OC6H4 (1f) H (2a) 25 3fa 79 78
7 m-CH3OC6H4 (1g) H (2a) 20 3ga 95 76
8 m-FC6H4 (1h) H (2a) 24 3ha 86 91
9 p-ClC6H4 (1b) n-Pr (2b) 15 3bb 92 92
10 p-ClC6H4 (1b) i-butyl (2c) 18 3bc 72 90
11 p-ClC6H4 (1b) i-pentyl(2d) 23 3bd 92 89
12 p-ClC6H4 (1b) n-C6H13 (2e) 19 3be 92 88
13 p-ClC6H4 (1b) (CH2)2OCH3 (2f) 25 3bf 95 81
a

Molar ratio of 1/2 = 1.5/1.0 equiv;

b

Isolated yield;

c

ee determined by chiral HPLC;

d

1/2 = 1.0/1.0 equiv;

e

Absolute configuration was determined from X-ray diffraction of compound 4ca.

Direct access to chiral spirocyclic compounds with a quaternary stereogenic center represents a significant challenge in organic synthesis.9 The carbon-carbon double bond of the functionalized chiral 3 provides a useful handle for further synthetic transformations. We envisioned that epoxidation of the double bond, followed by a tandem in situ intramolecular ring opening could occur to form a chiral polycyclic tetrahydropyran. As shown in Scheme 2, treating chiral compound 3ba with an excess of m-CPBA, followed by aqueous NaHSO3 afforded the spirocyclic oxazoletetrahydropyran 4ba in 84% yield and 90% ee.10 Under similar reaction conditions, both 3ca and 3ea also provided the corresponding spirocyclic compounds 4ca and 4ea with 92% ee and 90% ee, respectively. It is noteworthy that the overall reaction sequence generates three chiral centers, including one quaternary chiral center. The absolute configuration of the spirocyclic oxazoletetrahydropyran was revealed to be (S)-C10, (R)–C11 and (S)-C12 by single crystal X-ray diffraction of compound 4ca.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Highly selective preparation of chiral spirocyclic oxazoletetrahydropyrans

The exact mechanism for this tandem reaction sequence has not been precisely determined, however, it is reasonable that the high stereoselectivity is induced by the vicinal chiral amide group via hydrogen bonding interactions with m-CPBA through a six-membered ring transition state I (Figure 2). Directed by the amide, m-CPBA reacts with the enol ether from the Re-face to stereoselectively form the epoxide. This is followed by an intramolecular SN2 reaction (II) to provide the chiral spirocyclic tetrahydropyran 4.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A plausible mechanism for the tandem cyclization leading to the spirocyclic skeleton

In conclusion, we have reported the first catalytic asymmetric addition of DHP derivatives to N-acyl imines. This reaction has been shown to provide potentially useful chiral DHP derivatives in high yields and enantioselectivities. By using the chiral DHP addition products as the starting material, structurally unique spirocyclic oxazoletetrahydropyrans could be synthesized stereoselectively via a tandem epoxidation/ring-opening reaction sequence.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001
2_si_002

Figure 1.

Figure 1

ORTEP representation of the X-ray structure of 4ca with displacement ellipsoids shown at a 50% probability level

Acknowledgments

We thank the National Institutes of Health (NIH GM-082935) and the National Science Foundation (NSF-0847108) for financial support. We also thank Dr. Wenhua Zheng (USF) for the preparation of TRIP-PA.

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available Experimental procedures, characterization, and spectra. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.For reviews, see: Akiyama T. Chem Rev. 2007;107:5744. doi: 10.1021/cr068374j.Doyle AG, Jacobsen EN. Chem Rev. 2007;107:5713. doi: 10.1021/cr068373r.Terada M. Chem Commun. 2008:4097. doi: 10.1039/b807577h.
  • 2.(a) Uraguchi D, Terada M. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:5356. doi: 10.1021/ja0491533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Uraguchi D, Sorimachi K, Terada M. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:11804. doi: 10.1021/ja046185h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Uraguchi D, Sorimachi K, Terada M. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:9360. doi: 10.1021/ja051922a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Rueping M, Sugiono E, Theissmann T, Kuenkel A, Kockritz A, Davtyan AP, Nemati N, Beller M. Org Lett. 2007;9:1065. doi: 10.1021/ol063112p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Zeng X, Zeng X, Xu Z, Lu M, Zhong G. Org Lett. 2009;11:3036. doi: 10.1021/ol901047w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.(a) Rowland GB, Zhang H, Rowland EB, Chennamadhavuni S, Wang Y, Antilla JC. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:15696. doi: 10.1021/ja0533085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Liang Y, Rowland EB, Rowland GB, Perman JA, Antilla JC. Chem Commun. 2007:4477. doi: 10.1039/b709276h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Rowland EB, Rowland GB, Liang Y, Perman JA, Antilla JC. Org Lett. 2007;9:2609. doi: 10.1021/ol0703579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Li G, Rowland EB, Rowland GB, Antilla JC. Org Lett. 2007;9:4065. doi: 10.1021/ol701881j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Rowland EB, Rowland GB, Rivera-Otero E, Antilla JC. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:12084. doi: 10.1021/ja0751779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Li G, Fronczek FR, Antilla JC. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:12216. doi: 10.1021/ja8033334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.(a) Gizecki P, Dhal R, Toupet L, Dujardin G. Org Lett. 2000;2:585. doi: 10.1021/ol991326j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Akiyama T, Morita H, Fuchibe K. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:13070. doi: 10.1021/ja064676r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Liu H, Cun LF, Mi AQ, Jiang YZ, Gong LZ. Org Lett. 2006;8:6023. doi: 10.1021/ol062499t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Rueping M, Azap C. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2006;45:7832. doi: 10.1002/anie.200603199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Liu H, Dagousset G, Masson G, Retailleau P, Zhu J. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:4598. doi: 10.1021/ja900806q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cakir SP, Mead KT. Synthesis. 2008:871. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.(a) Faulkner DJ. Nat Prod Rep. 1998;15:113. doi: 10.1039/a815113y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Clarke PA, Santos S. Eur J Org Chem. 2006:2045. [Google Scholar]; (c) Franke PT, Richter B, Jørgensen KA. Chem Eur J. 2008;14:6317. doi: 10.1002/chem.200800850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.TRIP-PA was first prepared and used by B. List et al, see: Hoffmann S, Seayad A, List B. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2005;44:7424. doi: 10.1002/anie.200503062.
  • 8.It has been shown that the N,N-dimethylamino N-Acyl protecting group can be removed in a two-step reaction sequence. Please see: Uraguchi D, Sorimachi K, Terada M. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:9360. doi: 10.1021/ja051922a.
  • 9.(a) Corey EJ, Guzman-Perez A. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1998;37:389. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19980302)37:4<388::AID-ANIE388>3.0.CO;2-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Pradhan R, Patra M, Behera AK, Mishra BK, Behera RK. Tetrahedron. 2006;62:779. [Google Scholar]; (c) Kotha S, Deb AC, Lahiri K, Manivannan E. Synthesis. 2009:165. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gleave DM, Savall BM, McWhorter WW. Synth Commun. 1997;27:2425. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001
2_si_002

RESOURCES