Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 1.

Published in final edited form as: Epidemics. 2009 Dec 1;1(4):213–220. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2009.10.001

Xichang (Top) and Changqiu (Bottom): Four years of median predicted worm acquisition rate (day⁻¹), w′, solid line, and results of two-way SDC analysis of the influence of α₁₁ (time lag from +30 to +49 days) and α₂₁ (time lag from +50 × to +85 × days) on w′ (θ =120, p<0.01). Colored boxes represent significant correlations of fragments accounting for at least 50 percent of total variance; these are overlaid on the predicted worm acquisition curve at the central value of the fragment. Box colors represent the time lag between the correlated fragments. Note differing worm acquisition y-axes.

Inline graphic — Xichang (Top) and Changqiu (Bottom): Four years of median predicted worm acquisition rate (day⁻¹), w′, solid line, and results of two-way SDC analysis of the influence of α₁₁ (time lag from +30 to +49 days) and α₂₁ (time lag from +50 × to +85 × days) on w′ (θ =120, p<0.01). Colored boxes represent significant correlations of fragments accounting for at least 50 percent of total variance; these are overlaid on the predicted worm acquisition curve at the central value of the fragment. Box colors represent the time lag between the correlated fragments. Note differing worm acquisition y-axes.