Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1989 Jan;86(2):476–480. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.2.476

In vivo DNA loops in araCBAD: size limits and helical repeat.

D H Lee 1, R F Schleif 1
PMCID: PMC286493  PMID: 2643114

Abstract

Formation of a DNA loop by AraC proteins bound at the araI and araO2 sites, whose center-to-center distance is 211 base pairs, is necessary for repression of the araBAD promoter, PBAD, of Escherichia coli. To determine the upper and lower size limits of the loop, we constructed PBAD-reporter gene fusion plasmids with various spacings between araI and araO2 and measured their levels of expression. Spacings larger than about 500 base pairs resulted in elimination of detectable repression. No lower limit to spacing was found, suggesting that AraC protein itself possesses significant flexibility and its bending substantially aids formation of small loops. As the spacing between araI and araO2 varied, the activity of PBAD oscillated with an 11.1-base-pair periodicity, implying that the in vivo helical repeat of this DNA is 11.1 base pairs per turn.

Full text

PDF
476

Images in this article

476Image
on p.476

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. An G., Friesen J. D. Plasmid vehicles for direct cloning of Escherichia coli promoters. J Bacteriol. 1979 Nov;140(2):400–407. doi: 10.1128/jb.140.2.400-407.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Behe M., Zimmerman S., Felsenfeld G. Changes in the helical repeat of poly(dG-m5dC) . poly(dG-m5dC) and poly(dG-dC) . poly(dG-dC) associated with the B-Z transition. Nature. 1981 Sep 17;293(5829):233–235. doi: 10.1038/293233a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bliska J. B., Cozzarelli N. R. Use of site-specific recombination as a probe of DNA structure and metabolism in vivo. J Mol Biol. 1987 Mar 20;194(2):205–218. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90369-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Borowiec J. A., Gralla J. D. All three elements of the lac ps promoter mediate its transcriptional response to DNA supercoiling. J Mol Biol. 1987 May 5;195(1):89–97. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90329-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Broyles S. S., Pettijohn D. E. Interaction of the Escherichia coli HU protein with DNA. Evidence for formation of nucleosome-like structures with altered DNA helical pitch. J Mol Biol. 1986 Jan 5;187(1):47–60. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90405-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dandanell G., Valentin-Hansen P., Larsen J. E., Hammer K. Long-range cooperativity between gene regulatory sequences in a prokaryote. 1987 Feb 26-Mar 4Nature. 325(6107):823–826. doi: 10.1038/325823a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DiNardo S., Voelkel K. A., Sternglanz R., Reynolds A. E., Wright A. Escherichia coli DNA topoisomerase I mutants have compensatory mutations in DNA gyrase genes. Cell. 1982 Nov;31(1):43–51. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90403-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dunn T. M., Hahn S., Ogden S., Schleif R. F. An operator at -280 base pairs that is required for repression of araBAD operon promoter: addition of DNA helical turns between the operator and promoter cyclically hinders repression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Aug;81(16):5017–5020. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.16.5017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dunn T. M., Schleif R. Deletion analysis of the Escherichia coli ara PC and PBAD promoters. J Mol Biol. 1984 Nov 25;180(1):201–204. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90437-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Goldstein E., Drlica K. Regulation of bacterial DNA supercoiling: plasmid linking numbers vary with growth temperature. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jul;81(13):4046–4050. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.13.4046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hahn S., Dunn T., Schleif R. Upstream repression and CRP stimulation of the Escherichia coli L-arabinose operon. J Mol Biol. 1984 Nov 25;180(1):61–72. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90430-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hahn S., Hendrickson W., Schleif R. Transcription of Escherichia coli ara in vitro. The cyclic AMP receptor protein requirement for PBAD induction that depends on the presence and orientation of the araO2 site. J Mol Biol. 1986 Apr 5;188(3):355–367. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90160-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Huo L., Martin K. J., Schleif R. Alternative DNA loops regulate the arabinose operon in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Aug;85(15):5444–5448. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.15.5444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Johnson R. C., Glasgow A. C., Simon M. I. Spatial relationship of the Fis binding sites for Hin recombinational enhancer activity. Nature. 1987 Oct 1;329(6138):462–465. doi: 10.1038/329462a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Krämer H., Amouyal M., Nordheim A., Müller-Hill B. DNA supercoiling changes the spacing requirement of two lac operators for DNA loop formation with lac repressor. EMBO J. 1988 Feb;7(2):547–556. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb02844.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Levene S. D., Crothers D. M. Ring closure probabilities for DNA fragments by Monte Carlo simulation. J Mol Biol. 1986 May 5;189(1):61–72. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90381-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Liu L. F., Wang J. C. Supercoiling of the DNA template during transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Oct;84(20):7024–7027. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.20.7024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Martin K., Huo L., Schleif R. F. The DNA loop model for ara repression: AraC protein occupies the proposed loop sites in vivo and repression-negative mutations lie in these same sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Jun;83(11):3654–3658. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.11.3654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Norton P. A., Coffin J. M. Bacterial beta-galactosidase as a marker of Rous sarcoma virus gene expression and replication. Mol Cell Biol. 1985 Feb;5(2):281–290. doi: 10.1128/mcb.5.2.281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rhodes D., Klug A. Helical periodicity of DNA determined by enzyme digestion. Nature. 1980 Aug 7;286(5773):573–578. doi: 10.1038/286573a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rhodes D., Klug A. Sequence-dependent helical periodicity of DNA. Nature. 1981 Jul 23;292(5821):378–380. doi: 10.1038/292378a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Richardson S. M., Boles T. C., Cozzarelli N. R. The helical repeat of underwound DNA in solution. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Jul 25;16(14A):6607–6616. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.14.6607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shimada J., Yamakawa H. DNA-topoisomer analysis on the basis of the helical wormlike chain. Biopolymers. 1984 May;23(5):853–857. doi: 10.1002/bip.360230503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Shore D., Baldwin R. L. Energetics of DNA twisting. I. Relation between twist and cyclization probability. J Mol Biol. 1983 Nov 15;170(4):957–981. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80198-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Thompson J. F., Moitoso de Vargas L., Koch C., Kahmann R., Landy A. Cellular factors couple recombination with growth phase: characterization of a new component in the lambda site-specific recombination pathway. Cell. 1987 Sep 11;50(6):901–908. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90516-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tullius T. D., Dombroski B. A. Iron(II) EDTA used to measure the helical twist along any DNA molecule. Science. 1985 Nov 8;230(4726):679–681. doi: 10.1126/science.2996145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang J. C. Helical repeat of DNA in solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jan;76(1):200–203. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.1.200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wei C. F., Alianell G. A., Bencen G. H., Gray H. B., Jr Isolation and comparison of two molecular species of the BAL 31 nuclease from Alteromonas espejiana with distinct kinetic properties. J Biol Chem. 1983 Nov 25;258(22):13506–13512. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Whitson P. A., Hsieh W. T., Wells R. D., Matthews K. S. Influence of supercoiling and sequence context on operator DNA binding with lac repressor. J Biol Chem. 1987 Oct 25;262(30):14592–14599. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wu H. M., Crothers D. M. The locus of sequence-directed and protein-induced DNA bending. Nature. 1984 Apr 5;308(5959):509–513. doi: 10.1038/308509a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES