Skip to main content
Biology Letters logoLink to Biology Letters
. 2009 Oct 7;6(2):216–218. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0707

Live birth among Iguanian lizards predates Pliocene–Pleistocene glaciations

James A Schulte II 1,*, Franck Moreno-Roark 1
PMCID: PMC2865048  PMID: 19812068

Abstract

Among tetrapods, viviparity is estimated to have evolved independently within Squamata (lizards and snakes) more than 100 times, most frequently in species occupying cold climate environments. Because of this relationship with cold climates, it is sometimes assumed that many origins of squamate viviparity occurred over the past 2.5–4 Myr during the Pliocene–Pleistocene glaciations; however, this hypothesis is untested. Divergence-dating analysis on a 733-species tree of Iguanian lizards recovers 20 independent lineages that have evolved viviparity, of which 13 multispecies groups derived live birth prior to glacial advances (8–66 Myr ago). These results place the transitions from egg-laying to live birth among squamates in a well-supported historical context to facilitate examination of the underlying phenotypic and genetic changes associated with this complex shift in reproduction.

Keywords: squamata, Iguania, viviparity, phylogeny, molecular clock

1. Introduction

The shift from laying eggs to live birth is a complex evolutionary transition associated with significant modifications of a species' genome, morphology and ecology (Rothchild 2003; Crespi & Semeniuk 2004). Despite this, viviparity (live birth) is widespread among animals and has evolved independently numerous times in groups as disparate as reptiles, amphibians, fishes, molluscs, velvet worms, scorpions, insects and mammals. Among vertebrates, viviparous reproduction is inferred to have evolved no less than 141 times (Blackburn 1999; Blackburn 2005) with 102–115 potential origins within squamate reptiles (lizards and snakes). However, most of our functional understanding of this reproductive mode is derived from extensive studies on mammals. Unfortunately, reconstructing the evolutionary transition from egg-laying in monotremes to live birth in marsupials and placental mammals is difficult because of the age of this transition, which occurred at least 125 Ma in the early Cretaceous (Luo et al. 2003). Better understanding of the evolutionary requirements and timing associated with a shift in reproductive mode requires knowledge of the historical environmental conditions to which a particular lineage is exposed, its age of origin and changes in the morphology, physiology and genetic architecture of that lineage.

Most origins of viviparity in squamate reptiles are inferred to have occurred in colder environments at either high elevations or high latitudes (Shine 1985). The most widely accepted hypothesis for this pattern is that the probability of offspring survival in harsher environments is increased when females actively thermoregulate and maintain embryos at optimal developmental temperatures until parturition (Shine 2005). Therefore, one hypothesis is that most origins of squamate viviparity evolved relatively recently during the Pliocene–Pleistocene glaciations within the last 4 Myr (Blackburn 1995). Intraspecific phylogenetic studies on reproductively bimodal species Zootoca vivipara, Lerista bougainvillii, Saiphos equalis and Sceloporus bicanthalis support this hypothesis (summarized in Blackburn 2005). Alternatively, average global temperatures have steadily declined since the Late Eocene about 40 Ma (Lear et al. 2000), so we may expect to see a steady increase in origins of viviparous squamate clades over this time span. To date, these evolutionary hypotheses have not been explicitly tested using modern phylogenetic and divergence dating techniques.

Iguanian lizards are an ideal group to test alternative hypotheses for the origin of viviparity because they have evolved this trait multiple times. This group occurs worldwide, occupying diverse habitats from Southeast Asian and Brazilian rainforests to Tierra del Fuego and the Gobi and Atacama deserts. Several species live above 5000 m in the Andes and Tibetan Plateau (Pough et al. 2003; Vitt & Caldwell 2009). Currently three families are recognized, Agamidae, Chamaeleonidae and Iguanidae (Schulte et al. 2003b), with each clade containing several viviparous species. This study uses a phylogenetic tree of 737 species and fossil-calibrated divergence times to test alternative hypotheses for the origins of viviparous iguanian lineages.

2. Material and methods

(a). Taxon and data sampling

This study used 737 (733 iguanians, four outgroups) species including representatives of all major lineages of three iguanian families with 64 chamaeleonids, 196 agamids and 473 iguanids. GenBank accession numbers for the 712 previously published and 21 newly reported ingroup iguanian species, as well as four previously published outgroup squamate species are presented in the electronic supplementary material, table S1. Reproductive states for all species were obtained from the literature (electronic supplementary material, table S1) with exceptions where species states were inferred because literature sources were not available (some Anolis, Cophotis dumbara). Specimen voucher, locality information and citation information are available from GenBank flatfiles.

For newly reported DNA sequences, genomic DNA extraction, polymerase chain reaction conditions, primers used and sequencing were performed following Schulte et al. (2003a,b). These sequences represented the mitochondrial-encoded region spanning ND1 to COI. For this analysis, only the protein-coding regions, part of ND1, all of ND2 and part of COI were used, as intervening tRNA regions were highly variable among sampled taxa, making unambiguous alignment of these regions unreliable. Base positions inferred to have ambiguous homology at the ends of ND1 and ND2 were excluded from phylogenetic analyses (198 out of 1281 aligned positions). Alignment is available in TreeBASE (study accession number S2475, matrix accession number M4714).

(b). Phylogeny and divergence date estimation

Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic trees were estimated with RAxML (Stamatakis et al. 2008) in the CIPRES portal, with a priori partitioning by codon position for all three mtDNA genes combined. Analyses assumed a general time reversible sequence evolution model with gamma-distributed rate variation and proportion of invariant sites (GTR+Γ+I). Model parameter values were estimated from the data. This model was chosen because it is the most complex available in RAxML and almost all previously published studies using this mtDNA region have found that this model best explains the data. Eight independent runs were performed using all program defaults and the run with the highest likelihood was used as the tree for divergence analyses. All iguanian lizards were constrained to be monophyletic as long-branch attraction is hypothesized to explain a spurious sister–taxon relationship of snakes and acrodont lizards using these mtDNA sequences (Townsend et al. 2004). Phylogenies reconstructed using nuclear genes and morphology strongly support iguanian monophyly (Acrodonta and Iguanidae). Bootstrap resampling was applied using RAxML with 100 pseudoreplicates and parameter values estimated for each pseudoreplicate. Search conditions were identical with the initial search. The detailed bootstrap tree is available in the electronic supplementary material, figure S1. Bayesian (phylogenetic and divergence time estimation) analyses were not performed owing to computational and time limitations.

For ancestral state reconstructions of reproductive mode, Mk1 (one parameter) and AymmMk (two parameter) likelihood-based character evolution models were examined in Mesquite (v. 2.71 build 486; Maddison & Maddison 2009). There was bias in favour of oviparity to viviparity transitions (q01/q10 = 1.163) but a likelihood ratio test for a difference between Mk1 and AsymmMk models was not significant (p > 0.10). Oviparity was assumed to be the ancestral condition for this tree and was corroborated by likelihood analysis. Mesquite implements a likelihood threshold decision at t = 2 as a measure of statistical support for ancestral state reconstructions.

We used Penalized Likelihood implemented in r8s v. 1.71 (Sanderson 2003) for divergence time estimation. Cross-validation determined the optimal smoothing parameter with the additive-penalty function and truncated Newton method implemented. We assigned minimum age estimates to 12 internal nodes. Fossil placement on the inferred molecular phylogeny was determined primarily by whether a consensus exists among palaeontologists on the relative position of taxa in the squamate phylogeny. Minimum age estimates were assigned to stem groups, the most inclusive group of taxa that contains all extant and extinct clade members (Near et al. 2005). The root was assigned a maximum age of 218 Myr and minimum age of 144 Myr to span the age of Iguania inferred from several previous studies dating this node's age (see electronic supplementary material for dates, fossils and additional references, table S2). Divergence time confidence intervals were assessed using the bootstrap method outlined in Sanderson (2003) and calculated using the ABCq bias-correction method (Burbrink & Pyron 2008).

3. Results

Phylogenetic relationships among the major clades of iguanian lizards are consistent with previous studies (Schulte et al. 2003a,b). In each family, viviparity has evolved multiple times and at least 20 events (Chamaeleonidae, two; Agamidae, two; and Iguanidae, 16) have been reconstructed (clades strongly supported by bootstrap analysis). In our 733-species tree we estimated divergence times for 14 out of 20 clades. Five viviparous lineages, represented by one species each, were excluded because divergence times could not be calculated using singleton species. The sixth inferred event was not included because samples for this lineage were unavailable (Tibetan Plateau viviparous Phrynocephalus species).

Our analyses revealed that 13 of the 14 iguanian lizard clades evolved viviparity prior to the initiation of the Pliocene–Pleistocene glaciations (table 1). The iguanid clade containing the Northern Chilean species Liolaemus isabelae and L. paulinae is estimated to have evolved viviparity at least by mid-Pliocene (3 Ma) while another South American iguanid group, Phymaturus, is estimated to have evolved this trait earliest by approximately 66.4 Ma in the Late Cretaceous. In the remaining nine iguanid clades viviparity evolves most often in the Eocene (35.2–52.6 Ma). Both chamaeleonid clades, Chamaeleo jacksonii clade and South African Bradypodion pumilum clade, evolved live birth at least by 29–30 Ma in the Oligocene. Within Agamidae, the Sri Lankan genus Cophotis, viviparity is estimated to have appeared about 8.4 Ma.

Table 1.

Divergence times for viviparous iguanian lizard clades and immediate oviparous ancestor in millions of years. (Clades are listed by family and in order of mean age.)

clade age (mean) confidence interval (ABCqa) oviparous ancestor age (mean) confidence interval (ABCqa)
Agamidae
Cophotis spp. 8.4 3.6–12.2 35.1 27.3–45.2
Chamaeleonidae
B. pumilum clade 28.9 22.1–39.8 63.3 53.3–74.2
C. jacksonii clade 29.9 20.3–36.3 44 31.2–52.9
Iguanidae
L. isabelae clade 3 0–4.6 24.3 14.4–33
L. ornatus clade 15.6 1.1–15.3 29 14.3–32.2
L. nigroviridis clade 17.8 9.1–24.8 32.2 18.8–39.2
L. pictus clade 25.7 14.6–31.8 29.5 18.6–38.4
S. poinsettii clade 32.1 13.8–33.5 58.2 37.4–62.7
L. capillitas clade 35.2 32.3–52.4 68.8 52.6–78.5
S. adleri clade 44.2 21.6–47 62.7 43.4–70.6
L. montanus series 46.1 23.1–49.9 70.3 46.9–75.9
Phrynosoma orbicularae clade 50.4 31.9–61.5 62 37.5–71.7
L. lineomaculatus series 52.6 34.3–60.7 79.3 58.5–86.2
Phymaturus spp. 66.4 48.7–82.2 125.3 99.1–125.8

aABCq is approximate bootstrap confidence quadratic method of Burbrink & Pyron (2008).

4. Discussion

Our results are congruent with the hypothesis that most origins of viviparity in iguanian lizards occurred during the time of Earth's gradual cooling that began in the Eocene. The transition times between oviparity and viviparity for all but one of the 14 origins examined here are estimated to have taken place over this time period. In only one instance (Liolaemus isabelae clade) is viviparity suggested to have evolved during the recent glacial periods 2.5–4 Ma. However, the oviparous ancestor of this clade is at least 14.4 Myr old (table 1), so it remains possible that the origin of viviparity in this group took place prior to the onset of glaciations.

A potential bias in this study is the lack of accurate age estimates for viviparous origins in the singleton species sampled here (e.g. Sceloporus grammicus, Scel. jarrovii) and reproductively bimodal species (Zootoca vivipara, Lerista bougainvillii, Saiphos equalis, Scel. bicanthalis) not sampled. It remains possible that viviparity in these species evolved within the last 4 Myr (Surget-Groba et al. (2001) for Z. vivipara). Modern divergence analyses applied to these taxa are required to further examine this hypothesis. Although our analysis of Iguania reconstructs 20 of the 102–115 origins within Squamata, future comprehensive sampling within other squamate clades, especially Serpentes, Anguidae and Scincidae, as well as detailed population-level analyses of reproductively bimodal species, will be an excellent complement to this study in determining whether most viviparous origins occurred pre-Pliocene.

Squamate reptiles are an ideal group in which to test alternative hypotheses for the evolution of viviparity owing to this trait's origination frequency. Identification of squamate reptile lineages that have evolved viviparity over a range of time scales will provide a temporal framework to better reconstruct genomic, ecological, physiological and morphological changes that take place during the transition from egg-laying to live birth (Blackburn 2005). Our results offer useful information in historical reconstruction of diverse squamate lineages, improve understanding of the evolution of a recurrent theme in the history of squamate reptiles and reveal much about evolutionary patterns in reproductive systems in general.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Clarkson University and National Science Foundation (DBI-0109205, DBI-0314092 and DEB-0616630) for financial support. We thank J. Losos and D. Blackburn for a critical manuscript review and Alex Pyron for analytical advice.

References

  1. Blackburn D. G.1995Saltationist and punctuated equilibrium models for the evolution of viviparity and placentation. J. Theoret. Biol. 174, 199–216 (doi:10.1006/jtbi.1995.0092) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blackburn D. G.1999Are viviparity and egg-guarding evolutionarily labile in squamates? Herpetologica 55, 556–572 [Google Scholar]
  3. Blackburn D. G.2005Amniote perspectives on the evolution of viviparity. In Viviparity in fishes (eds Grier H., Uribe M. C.), pp. 319–340 Homestead, FL: New Life Publications [Google Scholar]
  4. Burbrink F., Pyron A.2008The taming of the skew: estimating proper confidence intervals for divergence dates. Syst. Biol. 57, 317–328 (doi:10.1080/10635150802040605) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Crespi B. J., Semeniuk C.2004Parent-offspring conflict in the evolution of vertebrate reproductive mode. Am. Nat. 163, 635–653 (doi:10.1086/382734) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lear C. H., Elderfield H., Wilson P. A.2000Cenozoic deep-sea temperatures and global ice volumes from Mg/Ca in benthic foraminiferal calcite. Science 287, 269–272 (doi:10.1126/science.287.5451.269) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Luo Z. -X., Ji Q., Wible J. R., Yuan X.2003An Early Cretaceous tribosphenic mammal and metatherian evolution. Science 302, 1934–1940 (doi:10.1126/science.1090718) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Maddison W. P., Maddison D. R.2009Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis, v. 2.71. See http://mesquiteproject.org [Google Scholar]
  9. Near T. J., Meylan P. A., Shaffer H. B.2005Assessing concordance of fossil calibration points in molecular clock studies: an example using turtles. Am. Nat. 165, 137–146 (doi:10.1086/427734) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pough F. H., Andrews R. M., Cadle J. E., Crump M. L., Savitzky M. L., Wells K. D.2003Herpetology, 3rd edn.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall [Google Scholar]
  11. Rothchild I.2003The yolkless egg and the evolution of eutherian viviparity. Biol. Reprod. 68, 337–357 (doi:10.1095/biolreprod.102.004531) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sanderson M. J.2003r8s: inferring absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times in the absence of a molecular clock. Bioinformatics 19, 301–302 (doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.301) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Schulte J. A., II, Melville J., Larson A.2003aMolecular phylogenetic evidence for ancient divergence of lizard taxa on either side of Wallace's Line. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270, 597–603 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schulte J. A., II, Valladares J. P., Larson A.2003bPhylogenetic relationships within Iguanidae inferred using molecular and morphological data and a phylogenetic taxonomy of iguanian lizards. Herpetologica 59, 399–419 (doi:10.1655/02-48) [Google Scholar]
  15. Shine R.1985The evolution of viviparity in reptiles: an ecological analysis. In Biology of the Reptilia, vol. 15 (eds Gans C., Billet F.), pp. 605–694 New York, NY: Wiley [Google Scholar]
  16. Shine R.2005Life-history evolution in reptiles. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36, 23–46 (doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152631) [Google Scholar]
  17. Stamatakis A., Hoover P., Rougemont J.2008A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web-servers. Syst. Biol. 75, 758–771 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Surget-Groba Y., et al. 2001Intraspecific phylogeography of Lacerta vivipara and the evolution of viviparity. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 18, 449–459 (doi:10.1006/mpev.2000.0896) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Townsend T. M., Larson A., Louis E., Macey J. R.2004Molecular phylogenetics of Squamata: the position of snakes, amphisbaenians, and dibamids, and the root of the squamate tree. Syst. Biol. 53, 735–757 (doi:10.1080/10635150490522340) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Vitt L. J., Caldwell J. P.2009Herpetology: an introductory biology of amphibians and reptiles, 3rd edn.San Diego, CA: Academic Press [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biology Letters are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES