Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1989 Jan;86(2):626–630. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.2.626

Evidence for the involvement of opioid neuropeptides in the adherence and migration of immunocompetent invertebrate hemocytes.

G B Stefano 1, M K Leung 1, X H Zhao 1, B Scharrer 1
PMCID: PMC286525  PMID: 2536172

Abstract

Evidence for the participation of opioid neuropeptides in immunoregulatory activities, especially cellular adherence and migration, has been obtained in representatives of two phyla of invertebrates, the mollusc Mytilus edulis and the insect Leucophaea maderae. The injection of a synthetic analog of [Met]enkephalin [( D-Ala2,Met5]enkephalinamide, DAMA; 10(-6) M) had a stimulatory, naloxone-reversible effect on the directed migration of immunocompetent hemocytes. Incubation of hemolymph in the presence of exogenous or endogenous opioid material significantly enhanced the adherence of hemocytes on albumin-coated slides as demonstrated by use of indirect Zeiss-Zonax reflectance computer analysis. Conversely, hemocyte adherence was markedly reduced by the addition of naloxone (10(-8) M) to the incubation medium, either alone or in combination with DAMA. The antagonistic effects of naloxone on the stimulatory activities of opioids indicate that, like those previously reported in mammals, they are receptor-mediated. The presence of an endogenous [Met]enkephalin-like material was demonstrated in cell-free hemolymph as well as sequestered hemocytes by use of high-pressure liquid chromatography and radioimmunoassay. These results demonstrate that the capacity of immunocytes to release and respond to opioid neuropeptide messengers is not restricted to mammalian organisms but was developed early in the course of evolution.

Full text

PDF
626

Images in this article

627Image
on p.627
628Image
on p.628
628Image
on p.628
628Image
on p.628

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ballieux R. E., Heijnen C. J. Brain and immune system: a one-way conversation or a genuine dialogue? Prog Brain Res. 1987;72:71–77. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)60197-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dimarcq J. L., Keppi E., Dunbar B., Lambert J., Reichhart J. M., Hoffmann D., Rankine S. M., Fothergill J. E., Hoffmann J. A. Insect immunity. Purification and characterization of a family of novel inducible antibacterial proteins from immunized larvae of the dipteran Phormia terranovae and complete amino-acid sequence of the predominant member, diptericin A. Eur J Biochem. 1988 Jan 15;171(1-2):17–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1988.tb13752.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Howcroft T. K., Karp R. D. Demonstration of cell-mediated cytotoxicity to allogeneic and xenogeneic tissue in the American cockroach, Periplaneta americana, using a combination in vivo/in vitro assay. Transplantation. 1987 Jul;44(1):129–135. doi: 10.1097/00007890-198707000-00026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Leung M. K., Stefano G. B. Comparative neurobiology of opioids in invertebrates with special attention to senescent alterations. Prog Neurobiol. 1987;28(2):131–159. doi: 10.1016/0301-0082(87)90009-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Leung M. K., Stefano G. B. Isolation and identification of enkephalins in pedal ganglia of Mytilus edulis (Mollusca). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Feb;81(3):955–958. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.3.955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Scharrer B. Cytophysiological features of hemocytes in cockroaches. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1972;129(3):301–319. doi: 10.1007/BF00307291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Scharrer B. Insects as models in neuroendocrine research. Annu Rev Entomol. 1987;32:1–16. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.32.010187.000245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Scharrer B. Neurosecretion: beginnings and new directions in neuropeptide research. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1987;10:1–17. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.10.030187.000245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sibinga N. E., Goldstein A. Opioid peptides and opioid receptors in cells of the immune system. Annu Rev Immunol. 1988;6:219–249. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.06.040188.001251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stefano G. B. Comparative aspects of opioid-dopamine interaction. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 1982 Sep;2(3):167–178. doi: 10.1007/BF00711145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Van Epps D. E., Kutvirt S. L. Modulation of human neutrophil adherence by beta-endorphin and met-enkephalin. J Neuroimmunol. 1987 Jul-Aug;15(3):219–228. doi: 10.1016/0165-5728(87)90117-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wybran J., Appelboom T., Famaey J. P., Govaerts A. Suggestive evidence for receptors for morphine and methionine-enkephalin on normal human blood T lymphocytes. J Immunol. 1979 Sep;123(3):1068–1070. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. van Epps D. E., Saland L. Beta-endorphin and met-enkephalin stimulate human peripheral blood mononuclear cell chemotaxis. J Immunol. 1984 Jun;132(6):3046–3053. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES