Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1989 Mar;86(5):1448–1452. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.5.1448

Adaptational "crosstalk" and the crucial role of methylation in chemotactic migration by Escherichia coli.

G L Hazelbauer 1, C Park 1, D M Nowlin 1
PMCID: PMC286713  PMID: 2646634

Abstract

We investigated roles of methylation in bacterial chemotaxis by characterizing a methyl-accepting transducer protein incapable of methylation because of amino acid substitutions at the modification sites. Mutant Trg protein recognized ligand and generated excitatory signals that affected flagella but was unable to mediate efficient adaptation or net cellular migration in a relevant chemical gradient. Defects caused by lack of methyl-accepting sites on Trg were suppressed by a sufficient cellular content of other transducer molecules with functional methyl-accepting sites. These observations establish directly that methylation is crucial for transducer-mediated chemotaxis and that neither phosphotransfer reactions among the soluble Che proteins nor other interaction among those chemotactic components can effectively fulfill the functions of methylation. Suppression was correlated with adaptational "crosstalk" in which unoccupied methyl-accepting transducers acquired methyl groups, thus apparently substituting effectively for blocked methyl-accepting sites on the transducer. A plausible model for this phenomenon is that increased methylation of unstimulated transducers results from global inhibition of the demethylating enzyme in a cell with a normally active methyltransferase and no available methyl-accepting sites on the stimulated, mutant transducer. Thus methylation can perform its roles in adaptation and gradient sensing even if modification occurs on molecules different from those that recognize the stimulating compound. This observation emphasizes the central role of methylation and the modular nature of the chemosensory system.

Full text

PDF
1448

Images in this article

1449Image
on p.1449
1450Image
on p.1450
1450Image
on p.1450
1451Image
on p.1451

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adler J. Chemotaxis in bacteria. Science. 1966 Aug 12;153(3737):708–716. doi: 10.1126/science.153.3737.708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berg H. C., Tedesco P. M. Transient response to chemotactic stimuli in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Aug;72(8):3235–3239. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.8.3235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Block S. M., Segall J. E., Berg H. C. Impulse responses in bacterial chemotaxis. Cell. 1982 Nov;31(1):215–226. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90421-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Callahan A. M., Parkinson J. S. Genetics of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins in Escherichia coli: cheD mutations affect the structure and function of the Tsr transducer. J Bacteriol. 1985 Jan;161(1):96–104. doi: 10.1128/jb.161.1.96-104.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Harayama S., Engström P., Wolf-Watz H., Iino T., Hazelbauer G. L. Cloning of trg, a gene for a sensory transducer in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1982 Oct;152(1):372–383. doi: 10.1128/jb.152.1.372-383.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hazelbauer G. L., Engström P., Harayama S. Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein III and transducer gene trg. J Bacteriol. 1981 Jan;145(1):43–49. doi: 10.1128/jb.145.1.43-49.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hazelbauer G. L., Harayama S. Sensory transduction in bacterial chemotaxis. Int Rev Cytol. 1983;81:33–70. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)62334-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hess J. F., Oosawa K., Kaplan N., Simon M. I. Phosphorylation of three proteins in the signaling pathway of bacterial chemotaxis. Cell. 1988 Apr 8;53(1):79–87. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90489-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hess J. F., Oosawa K., Matsumura P., Simon M. I. Protein phosphorylation is involved in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Nov;84(21):7609–7613. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.21.7609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kehry M. R., Doak T. G., Dahlquist F. W. Aberrant regulation of methylesterase activity in cheD chemotaxis mutants of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1985 Jan;161(1):105–112. doi: 10.1128/jb.161.1.105-112.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kehry M. R., Doak T. G., Dahlquist F. W. Sensory adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis: regulation of demethylation. J Bacteriol. 1985 Sep;163(3):983–990. doi: 10.1128/jb.163.3.983-990.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kehry M. R., Doak T. G., Dahlquist F. W. Stimulus-induced changes in methylesterase activity during chemotaxis in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1984 Oct 10;259(19):11828–11835. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Koman A., Harayama S., Hazelbauer G. L. Relation of chemotactic response to the amount of receptor: evidence for different efficiencies of signal transduction. J Bacteriol. 1979 Jun;138(3):739–747. doi: 10.1128/jb.138.3.739-747.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Koshland D. E., Jr Biochemistry of sensing and adaptation in a simple bacterial system. Annu Rev Biochem. 1981;50:765–782. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.50.070181.004001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nowlin D. M., Bollinger J., Hazelbauer G. L. Site-directed mutations altering methyl-accepting residues of a sensory transducer protein. Proteins. 1988;3(2):102–112. doi: 10.1002/prot.340030205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nowlin D. M., Bollinger J., Hazelbauer G. L. Sites of covalent modification in Trg, a sensory transducer of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1987 May 5;262(13):6039–6045. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Oosawa K., Hess J. F., Simon M. I. Mutants defective in bacterial chemotaxis show modified protein phosphorylation. Cell. 1988 Apr 8;53(1):89–96. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90490-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Oosawa K., Imae Y. Demethylation of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins in Escherichia coli induced by the repellents glycerol and ethylene glycol. J Bacteriol. 1984 Feb;157(2):576–581. doi: 10.1128/jb.157.2.576-581.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ordal G. W., Adler J. Isolation and complementation of mutants in galactose taxis and transport. J Bacteriol. 1974 Feb;117(2):509–516. doi: 10.1128/jb.117.2.509-516.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Park C., Hazelbauer G. L. Mutation plus amplification of a transducer gene disrupts general chemotactic behavior in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1986 Dec;168(3):1378–1383. doi: 10.1128/jb.168.3.1378-1383.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Park C., Hazelbauer G. L. Mutations specifically affecting ligand interaction of the Trg chemosensory transducer. J Bacteriol. 1986 Jul;167(1):101–109. doi: 10.1128/jb.167.1.101-109.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Parkinson J. S. Novel mutations affecting a signaling component for chemotaxis of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1980 Jun;142(3):953–961. doi: 10.1128/jb.142.3.953-961.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sager B. M., Sekelsky J. J., Matsumura P., Adler J. Use of a computer to assay motility in bacteria. Anal Biochem. 1988 Sep;173(2):271–277. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(88)90189-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Segall J. E., Block S. M., Berg H. C. Temporal comparisons in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Dec;83(23):8987–8991. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.23.8987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Springer M. S., Goy M. F., Adler J. Protein methylation in behavioural control mechanisms and in signal transduction. Nature. 1979 Jul 26;280(5720):279–284. doi: 10.1038/280279a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Stock J. B., Maderis A. M., Koshland D. E., Jr Bacterial chemotaxis in the absence of receptor carboxylmethylation. Cell. 1981 Nov;27(1 Pt 2):37–44. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90358-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Stock J., Borczuk A., Chiou F., Burchenal J. E. Compensatory mutations in receptor function: a reevaluation of the role of methylation in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Dec;82(24):8364–8368. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.24.8364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Stock J., Kersulis G., Koshland D. E., Jr Neither methylating nor demethylating enzymes are required for bacterial chemotaxis. Cell. 1985 Sep;42(2):683–690. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90125-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Taylor B. L. Role of proton motive force in sensory transduction in bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1983;37:551–573. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.37.100183.003003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Terwilliger T. C., Wang J. Y., Koshland D. E., Jr Kinetics of receptor modification. The multiply methylated aspartate receptors involved in bacterial chemotaxis. J Biol Chem. 1986 Aug 15;261(23):10814–10820. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Weis R. M., Koshland D. E., Jr Reversible receptor methylation is essential for normal chemotaxis of Escherichia coli in gradients of aspartic acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jan;85(1):83–87. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.1.83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES