Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1989 Mar;86(5):1510–1514. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.5.1510

Simultaneous recordings of force and sliding movement between a myosin-coated glass microneedle and actin cables in vitro.

S Chaen 1, K Oiwa 1, T Shimmen 1, H Iwamoto 1, H Sugi 1
PMCID: PMC286727  PMID: 2922395

Abstract

To elucidate the molecular mechanism of muscle contraction resulting from the ATP-dependent actin-myosin interaction, we constructed an assay system with which both the force and the movement produced by the actin-myosin interaction in vitro can be simultaneously recorded and analyzed. The assay system consisted of the giant internodal cells of an alga, Nitellopsis obtusa, which contain well-organized arrays of actin filaments (actin cables) running along the cell long axis, and a glass microneedle (tip diameter, approximately 7 microns; elastic coefficient, approximately 40 pN/microns), which was coated with skeletal muscle myosin at the tip and extended from a micromanipulator at right angles with the actin cables. When the myosin-coated tip of the microneedle was brought into contact with the exposed surface of the actin cables, it exhibited ATP-dependent movement along the actin cables over a distance of 20-150 microns in 20-200 s (20-23 degrees C) and eventually stopped due to a balance between forces generated by the actin-myosin interaction (800-6000 pN) and by the bent microneedle. Since the load on the force-generating myosin molecules increased with the bending displacement of the microneedle (auxotonic condition), the relation between the load and the sliding velocity of the myosin heads past the actin cables was determined from the time course of the microneedle movement recorded with a video system. The shape of the force-velocity curve thus obtained was convex upwards, similar to that of the force-velocity curve of intact frog muscle fibers obtained under the auxotonic condition.

Full text

PDF
1510

Images in this article

1511Image
on p.1511
1512Image
on p.1512

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Gordon A. M., Huxley A. F., Julian F. J. The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1966 May;184(1):170–192. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. HUXLEY A. F., NIEDERGERKE R. Structural changes in muscle during contraction; interference microscopy of living muscle fibres. Nature. 1954 May 22;173(4412):971–973. doi: 10.1038/173971a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. HUXLEY H., HANSON J. Changes in the cross-striations of muscle during contraction and stretch and their structural interpretation. Nature. 1954 May 22;173(4412):973–976. doi: 10.1038/173973a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hynes T. R., Block S. M., White B. T., Spudich J. A. Movement of myosin fragments in vitro: domains involved in force production. Cell. 1987 Mar 27;48(6):953–963. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90704-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. JEWELL B. R., WILKIE D. R. An analysis of the mechanical components in frog's striated muscle. J Physiol. 1958 Oct 31;143(3):515–540. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kishino A., Yanagida T. Force measurements by micromanipulation of a single actin filament by glass needles. Nature. 1988 Jul 7;334(6177):74–76. doi: 10.1038/334074a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kron S. J., Spudich J. A. Fluorescent actin filaments move on myosin fixed to a glass surface. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Sep;83(17):6272–6276. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.17.6272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nagai R., Rebhun L. I. Cytoplasmic microfilaments in streaming Nitella cells. J Ultrastruct Res. 1966 Mar;14(5):571–589. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(66)80083-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Oiwa K., Takahashi K. The force-velocity relationship for microtubule sliding in demembranated sperm flagella of the sea urchin. Cell Struct Funct. 1988 Jun;13(3):193–205. doi: 10.1247/csf.13.193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Oplatka A., Gadasi H., Borejdo J. The contraction of "ghost" myofibrils and glycerinated muscle fibers irrigated with heavy meromyosin subfragment-1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1974 Jun 18;58(4):905–912. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(74)80229-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Palevitz B. A., Hepler P. K. Identification of actin in situ at the ectoplasm-endoplasm interface of Nitella. Microfilament-chloroplast association. J Cell Biol. 1975 Apr;65(1):29–38. doi: 10.1083/jcb.65.1.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sheetz M. P., Spudich J. A. Movement of myosin-coated fluorescent beads on actin cables in vitro. Nature. 1983 May 5;303(5912):31–35. doi: 10.1038/303031a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Toyoshima Y. Y., Kron S. J., McNally E. M., Niebling K. R., Toyoshima C., Spudich J. A. Myosin subfragment-1 is sufficient to move actin filaments in vitro. Nature. 1987 Aug 6;328(6130):536–539. doi: 10.1038/328536a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES