Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2010 Apr 5;107(16):7347–7352. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911387107

Rapid deglacial and early Holocene expansion of peatlands in Alaska

Miriam C Jones 1,1, Zicheng Yu 1
PMCID: PMC2867679  PMID: 20368451

Abstract

Northern peatlands represent one of the largest biospheric carbon (C) reservoirs; however, the role of peatlands in the global carbon cycle remains intensely debated, owing in part to the paucity of detailed regional datasets and the complexity of the role of climate, ecosystem processes, and environmental factors in controlling peatland C dynamics. Here we used detailed C accumulation data from four peatlands and a compilation of peatland initiation ages across Alaska to examine Holocene peatland dynamics and climate sensitivity. We find that 75% of dated peatlands in Alaska initiated before 8,600 years ago and that early Holocene C accumulation rates were four times higher than the rest of the Holocene. Similar rapid peatland expansion occurred in West Siberia during the Holocene thermal maximum (HTM). Our results suggest that high summer temperature and strong seasonality during the HTM in Alaska might have played a major role in causing the highest rates of C accumulation and peatland expansion. The rapid peatland expansion and C accumulation in these vast regions contributed significantly to the peak of atmospheric methane concentrations in the early Holocene. Furthermore, we find that Alaskan peatlands began expanding much earlier than peatlands in other regions, indicating an important contribution of these peatlands to the pre-Holocene increase in atmospheric methane concentrations.

Keywords: climate seasonality, Holocene thermal maximum, peatland carbon, Alaska, Siberia


Ongoing and future warming at high latitudes has generated significant interest in terrestrial carbon-cycle feedbacks to climate change (1). Of particular concern and considerable debate is the long-term effect of climate warming on soil carbon (C) pools (25). Numerous studies have documented that warming negatively impacts soil C storage by increasing respiration and decomposition (2, 4, 6). However, long-term effects of warming on C storage remain controversial (2, 3), in part because these studies only cover relatively short time scales. Furthermore, most of these studies were performed in mineral soils, and few studies consider long-term climate sensitivity of C storage in organic-rich peat soils (5), which represent up to one-third of the global soil C pool (7). In peatlands, climate warming has the potential to increase net C accumulation by stimulating net primary productivity (NPP) but also decrease it through greater ecosystem respiration (including decomposition of old peat C) (8). Peatlands accumulate carbon where productivity is greater than the rate of decay, which occurs when the soil is waterlogged and water tables are relatively stable (8, 9). Saturated soils are necessary for the existence of peatlands, but the role of moisture in peatland C accumulation remains unclear. On relatively short time scales, water table depth manipulations have not produced consistent results (10, 11), and numerous studies have shown stronger responses of C dynamics to temperature than moisture changes (1013).

Most modern peatlands formed during the Holocene and thus represent a significant terrestrial carbon sink over this period (14, 15), as well as a methane (CH4) source (16, 17). It is well known that boreal peatlands developed rapidly during the early Holocene (1618) and are thought to have contributed to the early Holocene CH4 increase (16, 17), but results from previous studies do not show an early deglacial peatland initiation (16, 17) and thus cannot explain the deglacial increase in atmospheric CH4 concentrations. In addition, how rapid peat formation relates to climate is not well understood. Previous peatland data synthesis studies do not identify climatic mechanisms of peatland expansion, in part because of the broad geographic reach and variable regional climate histories of these studies (17, 18), hindering understanding of climatic controls on peatland C dynamics. Here we place late-glacial and Holocene peatland C dynamics in Alaska into the context of the regional climate history through detailed peat-core analysis, focusing on the early Holocene, a time when summer temperatures were higher than the 20th century average, winter temperatures were lower, and conditions were drier overall, as indicated by low lake levels (19). In addition, we will examine the connection between deglacial increases in atmospheric CH4 and expansion of Alaskan peatlands.

The Holocene thermal maximum (HTM) is a widely recognized period of warm climate in the high latitudes (19), attributed to an orbitally induced increase in summer insolation and a decrease in winter insolation (20). However, the HTM exhibits a spatiotemporal asymmetry across the northern hemisphere, owing to effects of the remnant Laurentide ice sheet and the large thermal inertia of the ocean (19). Extensive peatlands exist in Alaska and parts of Siberia (16, 17), each covering almost the same areas of 596,000 km2 (21) and 592,440 km2 (22), respectively. These two important peatland regions are located where the HTM coincided with maximum seasonality in insolation and presumably temperature (19, 23, 24), making these ideal locations for studying the effects of climate seasonality and temperature on peatland C dynamics. We also examine temporal patterns of C accumulation from four peatlands on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska, where the climate at the present is semicontinental due to the rain shadow effect from the Kenai Mountains, resulting in comparable summer precipitation to interior Alaska.

Results

Our analysis of peat basal dates shows a steady increase in the number of newly formed peatlands across Alaska (Fig. 1) beginning at ~18 ka (1 ka = 1,000 cal yr BP; Fig. 2C). The highest rate of peatland formation occurred from 12 to 8.6 ka, with a peak initiation at 10.5 ka, concomitant with the highest insolation seasonality (Fig. 2A). By 8.6 ka, 75% of modern Alaskan peatland area (63% of total basal dates) formed (Fig. 2C), followed by a 6-fold decrease in the rate of new peatland formation.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Digital elevation model (DEM) of Alaska. Dots indicate peatland sites with basal dates. Colors and sizes indicate paleoclimatically significant age groupings, including the deglacial (>15 ka), the Bølling-Allerød (15–13 ka), the Younger Dryas (13–11.5 ka), the early Holocene (11.5–10 ka and 10–8.6 ka), the mid-Holocene (8–6 ka and 6–4 ka), and the late Holocene (4–2 ka and <2 ka). Paleo-shorelines are depicted with dotted blue lines (adapted from ref. 25). The location of the Inset is outlined by a dashed-line. (Inset) Four peatland sites on the Kenai Peninsula used for carbon accumulation rate curves (Fig. 2B). 1, Swanson; 2, No Name Creek; 3, Kenai Gasfield; 4, Horse Trail.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Alaskan peatland C dynamics, seasonal climate controls, and the global connection. (A) Summer and winter insolation curves from 60°N (20) showing maximum summer insolation and minimum winter insolation in the early Holocene around 10 ka. We assume that an increase in insolation reflects an increase in temperature and vice versa (26). (B) Carbon accumulation rates (g C m−2 a−1) for four peatland sites on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska [left axis for individual sites, right axis for the mean of the four sites (dots ± SEs)]. (C) Frequency of basal dates as expressed in 50-year bins of 2σ calibrated age ranges from peatlands across Alaska (gray; n = 284), Siberia (light gray; n = 182) (16, 27), and the sum of Alaska and Siberia (black; n = 466). The highest frequency of basal dates (49% of total) falls within the period of maximum insolation seasonality (~11.6–8.6 ka), as shown by the vertical shaded bar, which also corresponds with the HTM in Alaska (19). The axis corresponding with these bars is located to the right. Solid black line, cumulative percentage of Alaska peatland sites; dashed red line, cumulative percentage of peatland sites in both Alaska and Siberia. The axis for these lines is located on the left. Both regions have similar peatland areas, so the curves also represent their weights and impacts equally. (D) Frequency of thermokarst lakes from Russia (n = 38), Alaska (n = 20), and western Canada (n = 11) (28). Red line, cumulative percentage of thermokarst lake formation. (E) Atmospheric methane (CH4) concentrations for GISP2 core in Greenland (29). The HTM in Alaska is indicated by the red vertical band. Climate intervals in (E) include the Younger Dryas (YD), Bølling-Allerød (B-A), Termination 1A, and Termination 1B.

To examine temporal variation of peatland C accumulation over the Holocene, we calculated C accumulation rates based on peat-core data from four peatlands in south-central Alaska (Fig. 2B). Our results show an average C accumulation rate of ~20 g C m−2 a−1 (grams of carbon per square meter per year) from 11.5 to 8.6 ka, four times higher than the average rate of ~5 g C m−2 a−1 over the rest of the Holocene. Visual examination of peat cores and macrofossil analysis of all four cores showed well preserved peat in the early Holocene compared with a much lower degree of preservation for mid- to late-Holocene peat (Fig. S1) (30).

Discussion

Rapid Peatland Expansion and Carbon Accumulation During the HTM.

Rapid peatland expansion from 12 to 8.6 ka with a peak at ~10.5 ka coincides almost exactly with maximum insolation seasonality and the HTM in Alaska (19) (Fig. 2A). The subsequent decline in rates of peatland initiation occurs concomitantly with decreasing insolation and climate seasonality, suggesting that a strong link exists between temperature seasonality and peatland development. Comparable explosive peatland expansion in the early Holocene has been observed in Siberia (16), which experienced a similar early Holocene climate and seasonality as in Alaska, but with a slightly later peak in summer temperatures at ~9 ka (23, 24), roughly concurrent with the maximum peatland expansion there (Fig. 2C).

Our data show both the most rapid peatland expansion and C accumulation during the early Holocene, a period that was previously deemed unsuitable for peatland development in high northern latitudes (7, 31). In the four C accumulation records from the Kenai Peninsula (Fig. 2B), Holocene C accumulation rates show a remarkably similar pattern despite differences in vegetation composition (30) and timing of peatland initiation (Fig. S1). Peat accumulation rates are controlled by both autogenic and allogenic factors. Under a steady climate, the rate of peat accumulation is sometimes higher initially and slows down over time, especially in continental peatlands (32, 33), as the peat surface becomes isolated over time from the groundwater source (32), and also as continued decomposition of the deeper anoxic peat layers reduces hydraulic conductivity (33). However, our records show well preserved early Holocene peat, despite botanical differences and having ~10,000 years to decompose (Fig. S1). In addition, two of these records initiated during the late-glacial period (~14 ka) but did not begin significantly accumulating peat until the early Holocene, presumably when the climate was more favorable. These observations rule out autogenic peatland processes as the dominant factor in controlling C accumulation at these four sites.

The timing of peat C accumulation rate changes in these four cores coincides with known changes in Holocene climate in Alaska. High peat accumulation coincides almost exactly with the HTM in Alaska. Although low lake levels in Alaska during the early Holocene suggest overall dry conditions (19, 34), Kenai Peninsula peatlands, which at the present experience a semicontinental climate and receive nearly as little summer precipitation as interior Alaska because of the rain shadow effect of the Kenai Mountains, do not appear to have been drought stressed. They likely received sufficient water input from glacial meltwater from the Kenai Mountains, whose glaciers receded beyond their modern limit during the early Holocene (35), or from sufficient late summer precipitation (36). In other regions of Alaska where peatlands were expanding, glacial ablation, thermokarst formation, and thawing of ice wedges (19) provided sufficient moisture for rapid peatland expansion. The end of the HTM, characterized by a less seasonal cooler, wetter climate, coincides with a decrease in C accumulation rates in the Kenai lowland cores. Particularly low accumulation rates beginning ~4 ka correspond with the onset of neoglaciation in Alaska (35), which has been shown to have decreased and even stopped peat accumulation processes in other boreal regions such as Siberia (37).

Net C accumulation is a function of, and long-term difference between, NPP and ecosystem respiration (including peat C decomposition). NPP is controlled primarily by summer temperature and growing season length, whereas respiration is controlled mostly by soil temperature and waterlogged conditions, with aerobic respiration occurring at a higher rate than anaerobic respiration (38). Although moisture is an important control on ecosystem respiration rates, recent studies have documented that temperature increases generate a stronger response in CH4 and CO2 fluxes than water-table changes in modern peatland manipulation studies (11, 12, 39, 40). Warmer temperatures have been shown to significantly increase NPP (41), suggesting that longer, warmer early Holocene summers would have resulted in enhanced productivity. During winter, a decrease in frost depth and moderate increases in snow depth (42, 43) can increase respiration rates enough to turn an ecosystem from a C sink to a source (43). A combination of diminished snowfall and lower winter temperatures during the early Holocene would have significantly reduced winter respiration rates, resulting in greater C sequestration, a climate pattern that can be explained by a weakening of the Aleutian Low in winter and a strengthening of the subtropical high in summer (44).

The high temperature seasonality during the early Holocene in Alaska was likely similar to the continental climate that characterizes several important modern peatland regions, including western Canada and the West Siberian lowlands. These two regions experience warm summers and cold winters and moderate rates of precipitation, and have the highest average rates of Holocene peat accumulation of all northern high latitude peatland regions (8). The difference in timing of the HTM across the northern boreal regions (19, 24) allows for further examination of the role of the HTM on peat C accumulation rates. The cooling effect of the Laurentide ice sheet in eastern Canada delayed the HTM until 5–3 ka, a time that corresponds with high C accumulation rates there (8). It should be noted that the timing of the HTM in eastern Canada is out of synch with maximum insolation seasonality, and true examination of the role of early Holocene seasonality must take this into account. This hypothesis can be tested in the southern hemisphere where the maximum insolation seasonality and HTM timing occur at 5–2 ka (20). Although data are sparse, one peatland record from Patagonia appears to show higher peat accumulation rates at this time compared with the rest of the Holocene (45).

Role of Northern Peatlands in Controlling Atmospheric Methane Concentrations.

Although peatlands represent a significant C reservoir, they also are a source of CH4 to the atmosphere (16, 17). Atmospheric CH4 concentrations began increasing during the last deglaciation, with two large and abrupt increases, one at the start of the Bølling-Allerød (Termination 1A) and another at the beginning of the Holocene (Fig. 2E), but the cause of the increases remains the subject of much debate (28, 29, 31, 4649). Several hypotheses have been proposed, the first of which suggests that releases from methane hydrates caused the atmospheric CH4 increase (46). This hypothesis is considered by some to be increasingly unlikely (47, 48). A second hypothesis suggests that extensive wetland development caused the increase atmospheric CH4, particularly the abrupt increase at the beginning of the Holocene (16, 17, 48). Finally, a recent study (28) proposes that thermokarst lake formation in Siberia, Alaska, and northwestern Canada during the early Holocene explains most of the atmospheric CH4 increase and maintains that the northern peatland basal date synthesis curve (17) lacks the rapid early Holocene increase evident in thermokarst lake formation (Fig. 2D). The lag in peatland initiation dates may partially be explained by the large number of sites located in Canada and Western Europe (17) where ice sheet dynamics and thermal inertia in the North Atlantic delayed the onset of Holocene warming (19).

Alaskan peatlands began gradually expanding ~18 ka, almost 5,000 years before Siberian peatlands (Fig. 2C) and >1,000 years earlier than was previously recorded for northern boreal peatlands (17). This early peatland expansion was largely possible because of a lack of an ice sheet over most of Alaska. The gradual increase in Alaskan peat basal dates corresponds with the beginning of the increase in atmospheric CH4 concentrations, which suggests that these peatlands contributed to the initial deglacial increase in atmospheric CH4 concentrations. The interpolar gradient in CH4 concentrations at this time implies that a northern wetland source must exist (49), but no sharp increase in peatland area in Alaska is observed at Termination 1A (~14.9 ka) to explain the sharp increase in atmospheric CH4 concentrations, suggesting that other factors may have contributed to that observed sharp CH4 rise. Because CH4 production shows a strong temperature dependence (12, 39, 40), it is conceivable that the warm Bølling-Allerød temperatures could have increased CH4 emissions in existing peatlands at that time, even with no additional new peatland formation. Furthermore, colder temperatures have been shown to decrease the residence time of CH4 in the atmosphere (50). It is also likely that by that time, peatland expansion had begun to the south of the Laurentide ice sheet and Europe (17). In addition, it remains possible that the CH4 increase at Termination 1A was caused by a northern hemisphere source of methane hydrates (46), although available isotopic data argue against this explanation (48, 50). It is also possible that thermokarst development increased as temperatures rose (28), or that subglacial methane was released from retreating ice sheets (51).

The rate of Alaskan peatland expansion does not decrease during the Younger Dryas (YD), and therefore it cannot explain the reduction in atmospheric CH4 concentrations. Closer examination of the spatial expansion pattern (Fig. 1) shows a lower rate of expansion on the North Slope of Alaska but continued expansion in south-central and eastern Alaska during the YD, a pattern confirmed by a detailed peatland and paleoclimate analysis from the Arctic Foothills (52). The decrease in peat expansion on the North Slope is attributed to colder, drier conditions (52), whereas the continued expansion in south-central Alaska suggests a weaker YD cooling with greater southerly atmospheric flow, a pattern simulated by numerous climate models (5355). The smooth increase may also be attributed to opening of the Bering Sea, which may have altered sea ice extent and atmospheric circulation patterns (Fig. 1) (55) to allow for continued peatland initiation. If cooling slowed peat formation and halted thermokarst development during the YD because of colder conditions across much of the ice-free boreal region, then these changes could explain the decline in atmospheric CH4 concentrations. A recent isotopic analysis of methane from the Greenland GRIP ice core suggests that a reduction in boreal wetland emissions should have occurred as a result of a decrease in wetland area (50), but these changes may have largely occurred outside of Alaska. A portion of the methane change can also be explained by biomass burning, which was likely lower during the YD (50).

During the early Holocene, expansion of Alaska peatlands preceded the expansion of Siberian peatlands by almost 1,000 years and occurred during the period of low thermokarst lake formation at the beginning of the Holocene, suggesting that Alaskan peatlands may have contributed most to the initial early Holocene increase in atmospheric CH4 concentrations at Termination 1B (11.6 ka). The delayed timing of peatland development in Siberia can be explained by dry conditions caused by the diversion or dismantling of westerly air masses by the Eurasian ice sheet (56) and may also explain the delayed onset of thermokarst lake formation, because the majority of sites are from Russia (28). The slight difference in timing of initiation ages in these vast peatland areas, in addition to the increased rate of thermokarst lake formation (28), may help explain the broad early Holocene peak in atmospheric CH4 concentrations.

By comparing peatlands and thermokarst lakes from the same region of Siberia and Alaska, where warmer-than-present summer temperatures (19) correspond to maximum insolation seasonality (Fig. 2A), we find that 70% of the combined Alaskan and West Siberian peatlands (Fig. 2C) developed by 8.6 ka, similar to thermokarst lake pattern (28) (Fig. 2D). We suggest that extremely rapid expansion of peatlands in Alaska and Siberia (16) during the early Holocene represents a significant contribution to the peak CH4 concentrations in the early Holocene. If we conservatively assume that the average early Holocene rate of peat accumulation was 15 g C m−2 a−1 and that the rate of peatland area expansion corresponds with the frequency of basal dates as a percent of total peatland area (Fig. 2C), we find that Alaskan peatlands would have sequestered 14.8 Pg of C between 11.6 and 8.6 ka. This suggests that Alaskan peatlands contributed significantly to the global soil carbon stock and that the previous estimates of 29–58 Pg of C uptake from all northern boreal peatlands in the early Holocene (17) are likely highly conservative. Although CH4 emissions from peatlands are highly variable, if we assume a conservative rate of 9 g CH4 m−2 a−1 (11), we estimate that Alaskan peatlands emitted 3 Tg CH4 a−1 during the early Holocene. If we assume a percent total of basal dates by 8 ka represent the percent of peatland area present, then we estimate that Alaskan peatlands contributed between 3 and 5 Tg CH4 per year, based on the estimate of 20–45 Tg CH4 released every year by present boreal peatlands (57). Our estimate is conservative, because many of these peatlands likely began as minerotrophic fens, which emit more CH4 than the oligotrophic peatlands found more often on the landscape today. In addition, the effect of warm early Holocene temperatures likely also contributed to greater CH4 emission (11, 40). By combining the Siberia and Alaska peatland datasets (Fig. 2C), an abrupt decline in peatland expansion is observed at 8.6–8.2 ka, slightly earlier in Alaska than in Siberia, corresponding with a nearly 100-ppbv decrease in atmospheric CH4 concentrations (Fig. 2E), which is attributed to the 8.2 ka cooling event (31). Although the established peatland area did not decrease, the cooler climate, combined with the drastic decrease in the rate of new peatland formation, may partially explain the decrease in CH4 concentrations.

The current distribution of peat basal dates is sparse over much of Siberia (8, 16) and much of the lowland area in Alaska (Fig. 1), suggesting that sampling of these vast areas may help us to better understand the impact these peatland regions had on increasing atmospheric CH4 concentrations. Furthermore, information about whether peatlands formed by paludification (peatland initiated or expanded onto uplands) or by terrestrialization (lake-infilling process) will improve our understanding of climate controls—specifically, increases or decreases in precipitation—on peat formation processes (8).

Implications for Carbon-Cycle Feedback to Present Climate Change.

Our data from Alaskan peatlands, along with Siberian peatland data (16), indicate that peatlands responded strongly to the heightened seasonality in the early Holocene by sequestering large amounts of C as well as emitting significant quantities of CH4. Early deglacial peatland development in Alaska may help explain the early increase in atmospheric CH4 concentrations, but the gradual increase in peatland initiation cannot explain the sharp increases and decreases in atmospheric methane concentrations over the Bølling-Allerød and Younger Dryas periods, suggesting that an additional northern hemisphere wetland source outside of Alaska contributed to the marked CH4 changes, or that changes in CH4 production within existing peatland during these known climatic intervals contributed to the CH4 concentration changes. Peatland expansion in Alaska is well timed with increasing insolation and temperature seasonality. Earlier studies pointed to the role of greater summer insolation and warm climate on early Holocene peatland expansion (16, 17), but our present study is, to our knowledge, the first to suggest that winter processes may also play an important role in carbon accumulation. Specifically, colder winters with low snowfall may have decreased peat temperatures to significantly reduce winter ecosystem respiration during the early Holocene. Our data suggest that high early Holocene temperature seasonality played a primary role in controlling the high rates of peatland C accumulation, and adequate moisture is necessary to maintain the presence and persistence of peatlands, but it does not determine the rate of C accumulation in these peatlands. Although we show that peatlands expanded and accumulated carbon under a climate warmer than today, we emphasize the importance of strong temperature seasonality in peat C accumulation at that time. As opposed to the early Holocene, recent and projected warming in high-latitude regions is most pronounced in winter and autumn seasons, owing to strong positive snow and ice feedbacks (1). Although our study implies that Alaskan peatlands responded favorably to a warmer climate, we caution that these results do not necessarily imply that peatlands will increase long-term C storage under current climate warming, particularly if warmer winters increase snow depths in these peatland regions (1), which would likely increase carbon loss from decomposition.

Methods

We compiled 284 basal peat 14C dates from both previously published sources and our own dating results (Table S1) across Alaska (Fig. 1) to assess the temporal pattern of peatland initiation and expansion in a region where the well established warm early Holocene climate (19) is concurrent with maximum seasonality (20). Basal peat 14C dates (Table S1) were calibrated to their 2σ age ranges using the program Calib 5.0 based on the INTCAL04 calibration dataset (58), and the calibrated 2-sigma age ranges were placed into 50-year bins. This was done to account for older bulk dates with larger calibrated age ranges and potentially imprecise mean ages. The number of sites in each bin was tallied to generate Fig. 2C. The percentage of peatland area was calculated based on cumulative numbers of these 50-year bins.

Carbon accumulation rates (Fig. 2B) are based on 1-cm measurements of C content and bulk density obtained through combustion (loss-on-ignition) and dated by 9–13 AMS 14C dates for each of the four cores (Table S2). The mean of the four sites was calculated for each 1,000-year bin using time-weighted averaged C accumulation rates for each core, and errors are standard errors of the mean.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Acknowledgments

We thank Thomas Ager, Edward Berg, Robert Booth, Daniel Brosseau, Shanshan Cai, Andrew Gonyo, and Dorothy Peteet for field and laboratory assistance and for sharing data; and David Beilman and two anonymous reviewers for providing helpful comments that improved the manuscript. This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant ATM 0628455 (to Z.C.Y.).

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0911387107/DCSupplemental.

References

  • 1.Christensen J, et al. In: Climate Change 2007: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Solomon S, editor. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ Press; 2007. pp. 847–940. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kirschbaum MUF. Will changes in soil organic carbon act as a positive or negative feedback on global warming? Biochemistry. 2000;48:21–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Knorr W, Prentice IC, House JL, Holland EA. Long-term sensitivity of soil carbon turnover to warming. Nature. 2005;433:298–301. doi: 10.1038/nature03226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Davidson EA, Janssens IA. Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature. 2006;440:165–173. doi: 10.1038/nature04514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dorrepaal E, et al. Carbon respiration from subsurface peat accelerated by climate warming in the subarctic. Nature. 2009;460:616–619. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gerdol R, Bragazza L, Brancaleoni L. Heatwave 2003: high summer temperature, rather than experimental fertilization, affects vegetation and CO2 exchange in an alpine bog. New Phytol. 2008;179:142–154. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02429.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gorham E. Northern peatlands: role in the carbon cycle and probable responses to climatic warming. Ecol Appl. 1991;1:182–195. doi: 10.2307/1941811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yu ZC, Beilman DW, Jones MC. Sensitivity of northern peatland carbon dynamics to Holocene climate change. In: Baird AJ, Belyea LR, Comas X, Reeve AS, Slater LD, editors. Carbon Cycling in Northern Peatlands. Washington, DC: Am Geophys Union; 2009. pp. 55–69. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Charman D. Peatlands and Environmental Change. West Sussex, United Kingdom: Wiley; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Strack M, Waddington JM, Lucchese MC, Cagampan JP. Moisture controls on CO2 exchange in Sphagnum-dominated peatland: results from an extreme drought field experiment. Ecohydrology. 2009;2:454–461. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Christensen TR. Factors controlling large-scale variations in methane emissions from wetlands. Geophys Res Lett. 2003;30:1414–1418. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Treat CC, Bubier JL, Varner RK, Crill PM. Timescale dependence of environmental and plant-mediated controls on CH4 flux in a temperate fen. J Geophys Res. 2007;112:G01014. 10.1029/2006JG00210. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zona D, et al. Methane fluxes during the initiation of a large-scale water table manipulation experiment in the Alaskan Arctic tundra. Global Biogeochem Cycles. 2009;23:GB2013. 10.1029/2009GB003487. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Post WM, Emanuel WR, Zinke PJ, Strangenberger AG. Soil carbon pools and world life zones. Nature. 1982;298:156–159. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Harden JW, Sundquist ET, Stallard RF, Mark RK. Dynamics of soil carbon during deglaciation of the Laurentide ice sheet. Science. 1992;258:1921–1924. doi: 10.1126/science.258.5090.1921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Smith LC, et al. Siberian peatlands a net carbon sink and global methane source since the Early Holocene. Science. 2004;303:353–355. doi: 10.1126/science.1090553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.MacDonald GM, et al. Rapid early development of circumarctic peatlands and atmospheric CH4 and CO2 variations. Science. 2006;314:285–288. doi: 10.1126/science.1131722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gorham E, Lehman C, Dyke A, Janssens J, Dyke L. Temporal and spatial aspects of peatland initiation following deglaciation in North America. Quat Sci Rev. 2007;26:300–311. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kaufman DS, et al. Holocene thermal maximum in the western Arctic (0-180°W) Quat Sci Rev. 2004;23:529–560. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Berger A, Loutre MF. Insolation values for the climate of the last 10 million years. Quat Sci Rev. 1991;10:297–317. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kivinen E, Pakarinen E. Geographical distribution of peat resources and major peatland complex types in the world. Annals Academiae Scientanum Fennicae Series A. 1981;3:1–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sheng Y, et al. A high-resolution GIS-based inventory of the west Siberian peat carbon pool. Global Biogeochem Cycles. 2004;18:GB2004. 10.1029/2003GB002190. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Edwards ME, Brubaker LB, Lozhkin AV, Anderson PM. Structurally novel biomes: a response to past warming in Beringia. Ecology. 2005;86:1696–1703. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Renssen H, et al. The spatial and temporal complexity of the Holocene thermal maximum. Nat Geosci. 2009;2:411–414. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dyke AS, Moore A, Robertson L. Deglaciation of North America. 2003 Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 1574. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Huybers P. Early Pleistocene glacial cycles and integrated summer insolation forcing. Science. 2006;313:508–511. doi: 10.1126/science.1125249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kremenetski KV, et al. Peatlands of the Western Siberian lowlands: current knowledge on zonation, carbon content, and Late Quaternary history. Quat Sci Rev. 2003;22:703–723. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Walter KM, et al. Thermokarst lakes as a source of atmospheric CH4 during the last deglaciation. Science. 2007;318:633–636. doi: 10.1126/science.1142924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Brook EJ, Harder S, Severinghaus J, Steig EJ, Sucher CM. On the origin and timing of rapid changes in atmospheric methane during the last glacial period. Global Biogeochem Cycles. 2000;14:559–572. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jones MC. New York: Columbia Univ; 2009. Climate and vegetation history from late-glacial and Holocene peat from the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska: a record of pollen, macrofossils, stable isotopes, and carbon storage. PhD dissertation. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chappellaz J, et al. Synchronous changes in atmospheric CH4 and Greenland climate between 40 and 8 kyr BP. Nature. 1993;345:443–445. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yu ZC, Vitt DH, Campbell ID, Apps MJ. Understanding Holocene peat accumulation pattern of continental fens in western Canada. Can J Bot. 2003;81:267–282. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Belyea LR, Baird AJ. Beyond “the limits to peat bog growth”: cross-scale feedback in peatland development. Ecol Monogr. 2006;76:299–322. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Anderson RS, et al. Holocene development of boreal forests and fire regimes on the Kenai Lowlands of Alaska. Holocene. 2006;16:791–803. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Barclay DJ, Wiles GC, Calkin PE. Holocene glacier fluctuations in Alaska. Quat Sci Rev. 2009;28:2034–2048. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Renssen H, et al. Simulating the Holocene climate evolution at northern high latitudes using a coupled atmosphere-sea ice-ocean-vegetation model. Clim Dyn. 2005;24:23–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Peteet D, Andreev A, Bardeen W, Mistretta F. Long-term Arctic peatland dynamics, vegetation and climate history of the Pur-Taz region, Western Siberia. Boreas. 1998;27:115–126. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hobbie SE, Schimel JP, Trumbore SE, Randerson JR. Controls over carbon storage and turnover in high-latitude soils. Glob Change Biol. 2000;6:196–210. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.06021.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Waddington JM, Harrison K, Kellner E, Baird AJ. Effect of atmospheric pressure and temperature on entrapped gas content in peat. Hydrol Proc. 2009;23:2970–2980. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lafleur PM, Moore TR, Roulet NT, Frolking S. Ecosystem respiration in a cool temperate bog depends on peat temperature but not water table. Ecosystems (NY, Print) 2005;8:619–629. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nemani RR, et al. Climate-driven increases in global terrestrial net primary production from 1982 to 1999. Science. 2004;300:1560–1563. doi: 10.1126/science.1082750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Öquist MG, Laudon H. Winter soil frost conditions in boreal forests control growing season soil CO2 concentration and its atmospheric exchange. Glob Change Biol. 2008;14:1839–1847. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nobrega S, Grogan P. Deeper snow enhances winter respiration from both plant-associated and bulk soil carbon pools in birch hummock tundra. Ecosystems (NY, Print) 2007;10:419–431. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bartlein PJ, et al. Paleoclimate simulations for North America of the past 21,000 years: features of the simulated climate and comparisons with paleoenvironmental data. Quat Sci Rev. 1998;17:549–585. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Pendall E, Markgraf V, White JWC, Dreier M. Multiproxy record of late Pleistocene-Holocene climate and vegetation changes from a peat bog in Patagonia. Quat Res. 2001;55:168–178. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kennett JP, Cannariato KG, Hendy IL, Behl RJ. Methane Hydrates in Quaternary Climate Change: The Clathrate Gun Hypothesis. Washington, DC: Am Geosphys Union; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sowers T. Late Quaternary atmospheric CH4 isotope record suggests marine clathrates are stable. Science. 2006;311:838–840. doi: 10.1126/science.1121235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Petrenko VV, et al. 14CH4 measurements in Greenland Ice: investigating last glacial termination CH4 sources. Science. 2009;324:506–508. doi: 10.1126/science.1168909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chappellaz J, et al. Changes in the atmospheric CH4 gradient between Greenland and Antarctica during the Holocene. J Geophys Res. 1997;102:15987–15997. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Fischer H, et al. Changing boreal methane sources and constant biomass burning during the last termination. Nature. 2008;452:864–867. doi: 10.1038/nature06825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wadham JL, Tranter M, Tulaczyk S, Sharp M. Subglacial methanogenesis: a potential climate amplifier? Global Biogeochem Cycles. 2008;22:GB2021. 10.1029/2007GB002951. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mann DH, Peteet DM, Reanier RE, Kunz ML. Responses of an arctic landscape to Lateglacial and early Holocene climatic changes: the importance of moisture. Quat Sci Rev. 2002;21:997–1021. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Mikolajawicz U, Crowley TJ, Schiller A, Voss R. Modelling teleconnections between the North Atlantic and North Pacific during the Younger Dryas. Nature. 1997;387:384–387. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Peteet D, Del Genio A. Sensitivity of northern hemisphere air temperatures and snow expansion to North Pacific sea surface temperatures in the Goddard Institute for Space Studies general circulation model. J Geophys Res. 1997;102:23781–23791. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Renssen H, Isarin RFB. Surface temperature in NW Europe during the Younger Dryas: AGCM simulation compared with temperature reconstructions. Clim Dyn. 1998;14:33–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Siegert MJ, Marsiat I. Numerical reconstruction of LGM climate across the Eurasian Arctic. Quat Sci Rev. 2001;20:1595–1605. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mikaloff Fletcher SE, et al. CH4 sources estimated from atmospheric observations of CH4 and its 13C/12C isotopic ratios: 1. Inverse modeling of source processes. Global Biogeochem Cycles. 2004;18:GB4004. 10.1029/2004GB002223. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Reimer PJ, et al. IntCal04 Terrestrial radiocarbon age calibration, 0-26 cal kyr BP. Radiocarbon. 2004;46:1029–1058. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information
0911387107_st01.doc (427.5KB, doc)

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES