Abstract
Selective culling in populations of most organisms is rank-order: individuals of low rank on a scale of potential fitnesses tend to be eliminated during early development, whereas surviving adults (whose number reflects the carrying capacity of the environment) are generally drawn from the distribution's upper end. Haldane pointed out [Haldane, J.B.S. (1932) The Causes of Evolution (Harper & Row, New York)] that selection which favors individuals in the upper tail of a composite distribution curve tends to favor members of the more variable of two populations, rather than members of a less variable one, even though the latter may possess the higher mean. In addition to reviewing earlier observations bearing on Haldane's argument, the present report describes an analysis of the comparative egg-to-adult viabilities of flies (Drosophila melanogaster) carrying combinations of second chromosomes obtained from one or another of eight experimental populations. Overall, the viabilities of flies carrying combinations of chromosomes one of which is shared (i/j vs. j/k) are as different as those of flies carrying combinations of independently sampled chromosomes (i/j vs. k/l). Episodes seemingly occurred within the populations during which flies carrying combinations that shared a chromosome differed more in their viabilities than flies carrying unrelated combinations. Such episodes could reflect the occurrence of selection of the sort described by Haldane.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Dobzhansky T., Wallace B. The Genetics of Homeostasis in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1953 Mar;39(3):162–171. doi: 10.1073/pnas.39.3.162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Federer W. T., Steel R. G., Wallace B. Mathematical models for chromosomal inversions. Genetics. 1967 Apr;55(4):783–795. doi: 10.1093/genetics/55.4.783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gimelfarb A. Multiplicative genotype-environment interaction as a cause of reversed response to directional selection. Genetics. 1986 Sep;114(1):333–343. doi: 10.1093/genetics/114.1.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kondrashov A. S. Deleterious mutations as an evolutionary factor. 1. The advantage of recombination. Genet Res. 1984 Oct;44(2):199–217. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300026392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- NOVICK A., SZILARD L. Experiments with the Chemostat on spontaneous mutations of bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1950 Dec;36(12):708–719. doi: 10.1073/pnas.36.12.708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WALLACE B. A comparison of the viability effects of chromosomes in heterozygous and homozygous condition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1963 Jun;49:801–806. doi: 10.1073/pnas.49.6.801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WALLACE B., VETUKHIV M. Adaptive organization of the gene pools of Drosophila populations. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1955;20:303–310. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1955.020.01.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wallace B. Genetic changeover in Drosophila populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Mar;83(5):1374–1378. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.5.1374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]