Skip to main content
Epidemiology and Infection logoLink to Epidemiology and Infection
. 2004 Jan;132(1):7–10. doi: 10.1017/s0950268803001547

Negative impact of clinical misdiagnosis of measles on health workers' confidence in measles vaccine.

R F Helfand 1, T Chibi 1, R Biellik 1, A Shearley 1, W J Bellini 1
PMCID: PMC2870071  PMID: 14979583

Abstract

We conducted a survey to determine the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of measles in Zimbabwe. Between December 1996 and February 1997, we collected blood samples and clinical and demographic information from a sample of 105 children with a clinical diagnosis of measles. A clinical case of measles was defined as a person with a history of fever, rash for three or more days, and either cough, coryza, or conjunctivitis. A laboratory-confirmed case of measles or rubella had IgM antibodies against measles virus or rubella virus respectively. A total of 91% of children met the clinical case definition. Among those who met the clinical case definition for measles, 72% were IgM-positive for measles virus only, 23% were IgM-positive for rubella virus only, 3% were IgM-positive for both measles and rubella viruses, and 2% were IgM-negative for both viruses. This study demonstrates the importance of considering selective laboratory confirmation of measles in periods of high disease incidence when the effectiveness of the vaccine is questioned.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (68.7 KB).


Articles from Epidemiology and Infection are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES