Skip to main content
Epidemiology and Infection logoLink to Epidemiology and Infection
. 2007 Dec 17;136(10):1416–1424. doi: 10.1017/S0950268807000039

Tick infestation on roe deer in relation to geographic and remotely sensed climatic variables in a tick-borne encephalitis endemic area

G CARPI 1,*, F CAGNACCI 1, M NETELER 1,2, A RIZZOLI 1
PMCID: PMC2870723  PMID: 18081949

SUMMARY

Roe deer Capreolus capreolus are among the most important feeding hosts for the sheep tick Ixodes ricinus, thus contributing to the occurrence of tick-borne diseases in Europe. Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE), which is transmitted by co-feeding of larvae and nymphs on rodents, requires precise climatic conditions to occur. We used roe deer as sentinels for potential circulation of TBE virus in Northern Italy, by examining the association between tick infestation, occurrence of TBE human cases, geographical and climatic parameters. Tick infestation on roe deer, and particularly frequency of co-feeding, was clearly associated with the geographic location and the autumnal cooling rate. Consistently, TBE occurrence in humans was geographically related to co-feeding tick abundance. The surveillance of tick infestation on roe deer, combined with remotely sensed climatic data, could therefore be used as an inexpensive early risk assessment tool of favourable conditions for TBE emergence and persistence in humans.

INTRODUCTION

The sheep tick Ixodes ricinus is the main vector involved in the transmission of the Western European subtype of tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEv) in north-eastern Italy, as well as in other European countries where foci have been detected [1, 2].

In the last few decades, an overall increase in the incidence of TBE in Central Europe and the Baltic States has been recorded [3]. In particular, in the early 1990s the incidence of TBE considerably increased within a few years in the Baltic region, whereas elsewhere, e.g. Germany, Slovakia, Switzerland and Czech Republic, the number of human cases has risen more gradually, and to a lesser extent [4, 5]. In Italy, the first human cases were reported in Tuscany in 1975 [6]. Although TBE is of marginal medical importance in Italy compared to the Baltic and Nordic countries, a tenfold growth in the incidence of TBE was recorded from 1975 to 2001 [2]. Currently, most human cases of TBE in Italy are confined to the north-eastern region of the country [7]. The TBE incidence rate recorded in the province of Trento, where the present study was undertaken, was estimated to be about 0·60/100 000 inhabitants per year for the period 1992–2004 [8].

The upsurge of TBE is probably the result of several factors. It may be explained partly by improvements in qualitative and quantitative epidemiological surveillance systems and diagnostics [9]. On the other hand, this increase has been related also to an intensified exposure of humans to ticks and, in specific countries, by social and political changes, e.g. increased forest frequentation for resource exploitation or leisure [10, 11]. In turn, the tick cycle depends both on climatic variables and host availability, which can condition tick abundance and spatial distribution [1214].

Viraemic transmission alone did not seem to explain TBE prevalence and distribution [15]. Several studies showed experimentally that transmission of TBE between immature stages of ticks is mediated through non-viraemic infection [16] which occur at the local skin site where ticks feed [1, 17]. Therefore, a particular pattern of tick seasonal dynamics influences TBE persistence, such as the synchrony of feeding larvae and nymphs on rodent hosts, especially the yellow-necked mouse (Apodemus flavicollis) [15, 18–20]. This pattern has been statistically associated with a high rate of autumnal temperature decrease relative to the annual maximum of the monthly mean temperature (‘autumnal cooling rate’, sensu Randolph et al. [18]). This condition explains why TBE is characterized by a high spatio-temporal heterogeneity as it occurs only in discrete foci within the tick's distribution [10] in contrast to Lyme Borreliosis, which occurs wherever competent tick species exist. Climate also indirectly influences the prevalence of TBEv in ticks by modulating population size and distribution of several host species [12], together with human-driven factors, such as changing agricultural or game management practices [21].

Although ungulates do not appear to be susceptible to TBEv and do not support viraemia [15, 20, 22], they play a considerable role in the ecology of TBE by feeding the adult stage of I. ricinus, thus modulating local tick abundance [21, 23]. Among the ungulates, deer, and particularly roe deer Capreolus capreolus are the most abundant wild hosts in Europe, common in deciduous woods that are potentially suitable habitats for ticks [24]. There is also evidence that deer can support a high proportion of immature stages of ticks, larvae and nymphs [25]. Previously, roe deer have been used as sentinels for endemicity of TBEv and TBE-complex virus in some sites in Germany and Denmark, respectively, using serology [2628]. In the eastern Italian Alps, where the province of Trento is located, roe deer are the principal wild ungulate in terms of abundance and distribution and have continuously increased over the past decades from about 12 000–30 000 (Autonomous Province of Trento, Game Management Assessment, 2003). Previous studies have evaluated tick occurrence on this species in relation to ecological variables and have found vegetation and altitude as strong predictors of intensity [29]. The abundance of questing ticks and ticks feeding on roe deer has been found to be greater in TBE-positive hunting districts (human cases) than in hunting districts where TBE has not been recorded [21]. A significant correlation between roe deer abundance (number of harvested roe deer) and TBE incidence was also found in the Czech Republic [13].

In this study, we used roe deer as sentinels of tick abundance from a regional to local scale, in relation to geographic and climatic factors that have already been related to TBE emergence and persistence. Therefore, the aims of this study included:

  • to verify the relation between roe deer tick infestation and geographic factors (hunting districts, altitude);

  • to assess the relation between roe deer tick infestation and climatic factors;

  • to test the association between tick infestation, geographic and climatic parameters and the occurrence of TBE human cases.

METHODS

Study area

The study was undertaken in the Province of Trento, north-eastern Italian Alps, in 19 hunting reserves, selected across the whole geographic and altitudinal range. The game reserves cover an area of 69 210 km2 where the altitude ranges between 150 m and 2050 m a.s.l. (centroid coordinates 11·21 E, 46·10 N) and 55% of the territory is covered by coniferous and deciduous forest. Of the investigated areas, most of the human clinical cases of TBE recorded in Trentino were from the Northern Sarca hunting district.

Tick collections from deer legs

The study was carried out on 132 roe deer shot during the first 2 weeks of September 2004, at the beginning of the hunting season. At this time of the year, roe deer are still territorial, thus almost evenly distributed in the area and representative of a certain geographic context [30]. To assess the pattern of tick infestation on roe deer, the lower part of the forelegs (distal to carpal joint) was removed immediately after the roe deer was shot and sealed in a plastic bag. Site and altitude were recorded for each sample. The samples were stored at −20°C before processing and then examined for tick abundance and presence of coincidental feeding of larvae and nymphs (adults unconsidered) [31]. In particular, we define co-feeding as an aggregation of any tick life-stage (without distinguishing between larval-nymphal and nymphal-nymphal aggregations and excluding larvae-larvae associations as these are likely to be pathogen free), feeding at a perceptible distance (about 1 cm, following Randolph et al. [19]).

Ticks were counted and examined microscopically to determine species and stage using a reference key [32].

Climatic and geographic data

Following the methodology from Randolph et al. [18], we calculated the autumnal cooling rate (decrease of autumnal temperature relative to the annual maximum of monthly mean temperature) from satellite data. We obtained a time-series of MODIS Land Surface Temperature (LST) data (level V004) through the NASA EOS Data Gateway. For our study, we used MODIS data for 2003 since we analysed the pattern of tick infestation in 2004, which, in turn, is the result of tick development in 2003 [18]. We processed data from the Terra (T) and Aqua (A) satellites [to gain overpasses four times a day, at about 01:30 hours (A), 10:30 hours (T), 13:30 hours (A), and 22:30 hours (T), local time]. The original LST data are provided in Kelvins at a pixel resolution of 1 km2, in sinusoidal projection. We applied a pre-processing procedure, which included a re-projection to the Italian Gauss-Boaga cartographic system, the application of the bit-pattern encoded MODIS quality assurance (QA) maps to remove poor-quality pixels and to convert Kelvins to degrees Celsius (°C) [8, 33]. To calculate the autumnal cooling, we applied a linear regression to the monthly LST mean values of August, September and October time-series. In addition, we selected the annual maximum of the monthly mean LST values per pixel. We examined the cooling rate in relation to the maximum LST value as they are positively correlated.

Further GIS (Geographical Information System) data were prepared: hunting reserves were intersected with elevation belts (0–499 m, 500–999 m and ⩾1000 m a.s.l.). For the resulting subdivided hunting district polygons, we extracted autumnal cooling data statistics, and particularly: autumnal decrease in temperature, annual maximum of monthly mean temperature and autumnal decrease divided by annual maximum of monthly mean temperature.

The entire procedure was implemented in GRASS GIS 6 and R statistical language [34, 35].

Statistical analysis

We investigated if the pattern of tick infestation on roe deer, and in particular the number of co-feeding ticks, and the occurrence of TBE human cases (1992–2004) were predicted by geographical and climatic parameters. We therefore fitted a generalized linear model (GLM) with either negative binomial error distribution (for the response variables N_Ticks, nymphs and larvae, N_Nymphs nymphs only and Co-feeding, number of co-feeding ticks) or binomial error distribution (for the response variable TBE, occurrence of TBE human cases in hunting districts) by means of R statistical language [34] using the R package MASS [36]. We tested the effects of altitude (ALT), location (DIST: 19 hunting reserves pooled in seven hunting districts) on N_Ticks, N_Nymphs, Co-feeding and TBE. On the same response variables, we also tested the effect of the annual maximum of monthly mean temperature (Tmax), autumnal decrease of temperature (Cool) and the rate among these two parameters (Cool/Tmax). These two variables were entered into the model with a negative sign.

Even though the autumnal cooling rate was originally related to spring tick activity [18], later analyses on tick seasonal dynamics point out the emergence of a single cohort of each stage of ticks each year in the autumn [37]. We based our analyses on this observation.

Moreover, we tested whether the TBE cases can be predicted by tick infestation fitting a GLM with binomial error distribution.

Response variables were modelled for dependence on predictor variables using the model selection method based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC) corrected for small sample size, AICc [38]. From the AICc differences (ΔAICc), we calculated AICc weights (ω) and the relative evidence ratios. When differences in AICc values were <2, indicating approximately equal parsimony of models, we ranked all variables considered in the full model according to their importance [predictor weights ω+(j)]. Parameter estimates were evaluated for the best model or by model averaging, in case of equal parsimonious models, weighting estimates from each model according to their Akaike weight.

RESULTS

Out of 132 roe deer legs analysed, 77·3% were infested with at least one tick. The total ticks counted were very high, with a total of 4754 larvae, 630 nymphs and 15 adults. I. ricinus was the only tick species recorded. The adults were not considered in the statistical analysis, due to the small sample size. The pattern of tick infestation on roe deer samples showed a typical aggregated distribution of larval and nymphal ticks. The mean number of larvae and nymphs were 36·02 (s.e.=5·20) and 4·78 (s.e.=0·74), respectively. The highest observed infestation for one sample was 388 ticks (both nymphs and larvae).

The maximum of mean monthly temperature recorded in 2003 in the hunting districts where roe deer samples were collected varied between 16·84°C and 25·21°C, while the decrease of temperature from August to October ranged between −8·05°C and −6·13°C.

In the present study, we found significant differences in tick infestation on roe deer along the geographic range. The best model explaining total number of ticks included altitude, hunting district and the interaction between those two variables (Table 1a). As shown by the best model coefficients, tick infestation level was significantly higher in some geographic contexts (i.e. hunting districts and hunting district∗altitude) than in others, while altitude alone did not exert any significant effect (Fig. 1, Table 3). We obtained similar results for number of nymphs only (Tables 1a, 3). The best model to explain number of co-feeding ticks with respect to geographic attributes included altitude and hunting districts (but not the interaction between them; Table 1a, Fig. 2). Specifically, model coefficients showed a significant negative correlation with altitude and an uneven number of co-feeding ticks within hunting districts (Table 3). TBE human cases were predicted by hunting districts only, although coefficients were not properly estimated (Tables 2b, 3).

Table 1.

Akaike's Information Criterion (AICc) ranking of a priori models to estimate dependence of total number of ticks, nymphs and co-feeding on roe deer samples from (a) geographic and (b) climatic parameters, respectively

graphic file with name S0950268807000039_tab1.jpg

K, Number of parameters; ΔAICc, difference in AICc between the best and the actual model; ωi, Akaike's weight; Evidence ratios, ratio of Akaike's weights of the best and the actual model. The table shows only the first two ranked best models.

N_Ticks, number of total ticks (larvae and nymphs) counted on roe deer legs; N_Nymphs, number of nymphs counted on roe deer legs; Co-feeding, number of co-feeding ticks on roe deer legs; ALT, altitude; DIST, hunting districts; Tmax, annual maximum of the monthly mean temperature for 2003; Cool, autumnal temperature decline recorded during 2003; Cool/Tmax, rate of autumnal temperature decrease relative to the annual maximum of the monthly mean temperature for 2003.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Mean number of larvae (■) and nymphs (□) per roe deer sample in relation to the geographic location (hunting districts). * Indicates the hunting district where tick-borne encephalitis human cases were recorded since 1992.

Table 3.

Parameter estimates relative to the best model (ΔAICc >2) or evaluated by model averaging, in case of equal parsimonious models, for the response variables total number of ticks, nymphs only, number of co-feeding on roe deer samples and tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) human cases. Theta (θ) refers to the dispersion parameter of the selected model when a negative binomial error distribution is applied

graphic file with name S0950268807000039_tab3.jpg

Best model

Full model.

DIST, Hunting districts; DIST-1, Cembra; DIST-2, Right Adige; DIST-3, Northern Sarca; DIST-4, Left Adige; DIST-5, Trento; DIST-6, Fiemme Valley.

For parameter abbreviations see Table 1.

*

P⩽0·05; ** P⩽0·01; *** P⩽0·001.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Proportion of roe deer samples with co-feeding in relation to geographic location (hunting districts). * Indicates the hunting district where tick-borne encephalitis human cases were recorded since 1992.

Table 2.

Akaike's Information Criterion (AICc) ranking of a priori models to estimate dependence of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) human cases from (a) tick burden, (b) geographic and (c) climatic parameters, respectively

graphic file with name S0950268807000039_tab2.jpg

K, Number of parameters; ΔAICc, difference in AICc between the best and the actual model; ωi, Akaike's weight; Evidence ratios, ratio of Akaike's weights of the best and the actual model.

For parameter abbreviations see Table 1.

TBE, Sites where TBE human cases were recorded.

Total number of ticks, nymphs only and number of co-feeding ticks were also significantly affected by climatic factors (Table 1b). Specifically, there was a weak negative correlation with both the annual maximum of monthly mean temperature and the autumnal temperature decrease, whilst the rate among these two variables had a strong positive effect. All climatic factors were relevant predictor variables for TBE human cases (predictor weights: Tmax=1·00, Cool=0·95, TmaxCool=0·35, Cool/Tmax=0·44) and included in either equal parsimonious model (Table 2c), but only the rate of the autumnal temperature decrease to the annual maximum of monthly mean temperature had a strong positive effect, as shown by the model averaged coefficients (Table 3).

Tick infestation variables were all relevant predictor variables for TBE human cases (predictor weights: N_Ticks=0·43, N_Nymphs=0·42, Co-feeding=0·50; Table 2a), with the number of co-feeding ticks having a stronger effect than the total number of ticks and nymphs only (Table 3).

DISCUSSION

In the present study, we investigated the pattern of tick infestation on roe deer in relation to geographical and climatic parameters in the province of Trento, north-eastern Italian Alps. At a regional scale, we found that tick abundance on roe deer was clearly associated with the geographic location, whereas altitude alone scarcely explained this variable. This result is consistent with the strong effect of autumnal cooling rate [18] on tick abundance that we recorded, because the autumnal temperature decrease relative to the annual maximum of the monthly mean temperature is a climatic profile which is likely to be site specific in a discontinuous and patchy environment such as the Alpine range. Here, the altitudinal variation and geomorphological features (e.g. valleys, ridges and rocky outcrops) determine local micro-climates.

In roe deer samples, we frequently detected larvae and nymphs attached close together to the tissue. This association has been already defined as coincidental feeding of larvae and nymphs (co-feeding) for other species, such as small mammals [1517], and it is a required condition for TBE persistence in the environment. Randolph et al. [18] emphasized that presence of co-feeding ticks on hosts depends on seasonal synchrony of these different tick development stages, which is strictly associated with certain climatic conditions. In particular, the synchrony of nymphs and larvae would occur in a certain range of autumnal cooling rate, as defined above. Currently, the presence of co-feeding ticks on ruminants had not been assessed as there is no evidence that ungulates are competent hosts for TBE [22]. Our study showed that, notwithstanding the indirect role of roe deer in TBE transmission, they could provide surveillance of the seasonal synchrony of immature ticks at a regional scale. In our study, co-feeding abundance on roe deer samples varied spatially and was strongly positively correlated with the autumnal cooling rate. In the hunting district where co-feeding ticks were detected in the largest proportion of samples (Northern Sarca), the synchrony between feeding larvae and nymphs had also been observed on rodents for three consecutive years, including 2004 [39]. Several studies underline the importance of the peak of synchrony in spring time to the effective amplification of TBEv [20]; other studies emphasize that the maximum incidence of human TBE cases coincides with the seasonal peaks of the feeding activity of I. ricinus which occur in spring and autumn time [1]. In our study, samples were collected in September (hunting season) and we may, therefore, have detected the second peak of the synchrony phenomenon.

Our results suggest a geographic association between TBE occurrence in humans and tick infestation on deer, particularly abundance of co-feeding ticks [18, 21], that in turn results in a strong positive effect of autumnal cooling rate. Consistently, the occurrence of TBE human cases was well predicted by the geographic location, in accordance with the observed heterogeneous distribution in foci of this disease [10].

In an Alpine area such as Trentino province, mainly covered by forests and characterized by an increasing intersection of natural and human exploited areas, an abundant and ubiquitous wild ungulate species, such as the roe deer, represents an ideal sentinel of TBE distribution. Collection of samples is inexpensive, being a hunted species, and sampling could easily fulfil requirements of randomness and geographic continuity. Recently, domestic ungulates (goats) were proposed as indicators of TBEv circulation in Trentino through seroprevalence assessment, together with collection of remotely sensed climatic data [8]. Roe deer have also been used as a sentinel for endemicity of TBEv using serological investigation in several sites in Europe [22, 26, 27].

We suggest that monitoring tick infestation of deer, together with collection of climatic data is a potentially useful tool for verifying the occurrence of TBE-favourable conditions at a regional scale, i.e. tick abundance and synchrony of immature stages. Indeed, deer density has been shown to affect TBE persistence and circulation [19, 23] together with abundance of other key hosts such as small mammals [40] which are more difficult to monitor, but present in similar habitats to those optimal for roe deer. Moreover, in the Alpine context, spatial distribution and movements of a crucial and mobile tick host such as roe deer is likely to affect the spatial dynamics and pattern of TBE. As possible evidence, the average home range size of roe deer in our study area [64 ha for resident individuals and 283 ha for migrant individuals (F. Cagnacci, unpublished data)], is a spatial scale comparable to that of TBE foci in Italy [21]. This first screening of potential areas of TBEv circulation could then be followed by more targeted virological investigation on feeding ticks and serological investigation on competent hosts (i.e. rodents) and, for TBE risk assessment in humans, trigger considerations for leisure and routine activities taking place in high-risk areas.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was partially supported by the Research Fund of the Autonomous Province of Trento (Grant no. 3479 to F.C.: BECOCERWI – Behavioural Ecology of Cervids in Relation to Wildlife Infections). This research was partially funded by EU grant GOCE-2003-010284 EDEN and the paper is catalogued by the EDEN Steering Committee as EDEN 0068 (http://www.eden-fp6project.net/). We thank the Hunting Association of Trento Province (Associazione Cacciatori della Provincia di Trento) for collecting roe deer samples. Fausta Rosso is acknowledged for helping with parasite identification. We are grateful to Sarah Perkins and two anonymous reviewers who provided helpful comments on an earlier version of the paper.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Gritsun TS, Lashkevich VA, Gould EA. Tick-borne encephalitis. Antiviral Research. 2003;57:129–146. doi: 10.1016/s0166-3542(02)00206-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Süss J. Epidemiology and ecology of TBE relevant to the production of effective vaccines. Vaccine. 2003;21:19–35. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(02)00812-5. (Suppl. 1): [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Randolph SE. EDEN – Emerging diseases in a changing European environment: Tick-borne diseases. International Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2006;296:84–86. (Suppl. 1): [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Randolph SE. The shifting landscape of tick-borne zoonoses: tick-borne encephalitis and Lyme borreliosis in Europe. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B. 2001;356:1045–1056. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sumilo D et al. Tick-borne encephalitis in the Baltic States: Identifying risk factors in space and time. International Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2006;296:76–79. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2005.12.006. (Suppl. 1): [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Amaducci L et al. Tick borne encephalitis (TBE) in Italy: report of the first clinical case. Rivista di Patologia Nervosa Mentale. 1976;97:77–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Beltrame A et al. Tick-borne encephalitis virus, Northeastern Italy. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2006;12:1617–1619. doi: 10.3201/eid1210.060395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rizzoli A et al. Early detection of TBEv spatial distribution and activity in the Province of Trento assessed using serological and remotely-sensed climatic data. Geospatial Health. 2007;1:169–176. doi: 10.4081/gh.2007.265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rendi-Wagner P. Risk and prevention of Tick-borne encephalitis in travellers. Journal of Travel Medicine. 2004;11:307–312. doi: 10.2310/7060.2004.19107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rogers DJ, Randolph SE. Climate change and vector-borne diseases. Advances in Parasitology. 2006;62:345–381. doi: 10.1016/S0065-308X(05)62010-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sumilo D et al. Climate change cannot explain the upsurge of tick-borne encephalitis in the Baltics. PloS ONE. 2007;2(6):1–11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lindgren E, Gustafson R. Tick-borne encephalitis in Sweden and climate change. Lancet. 2001;358:16–18. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)05250-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zeman P, Benes C. A tick-borne encephalitis ceiling in Central Europe has moved upwards during the last 30 years: possible impact of global warming? International Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2004;293:48–54. doi: 10.1016/s1433-1128(04)80008-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Daniel M et al. Risk assessment and prediction of Ixodes ricinus tick questing activity and human Tick-borne encephalitis infection in space and time in the Czech Republic. International Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2006;296:41–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2006.02.008. (Suppl. 1): [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Randolph SE et al. Incidence from coincidence: patterns of tick infestations in rodents facilitate transmission of tick-borne encephalitis virus. Parasitology. 1999;118:177–186. doi: 10.1017/s0031182098003643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Labuda M et al. Non-viremic transmission of tick-borne encephalitis virus: a mechanism for arbovirus survival in nature. Experientia. 1993;9:802–805. doi: 10.1007/BF01923553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Labuda M et al. Importance of localized skin infection in tick-borne encephalitis virus transmission. Virology. 1996;219:356–366. doi: 10.1006/viro.1996.0261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Randolph SE et al. Seasonal synchrony: the key to the tick-borne pathogen transmission. Parasitology. 2000;121:15–23. doi: 10.1017/s0031182099006083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Randolph SE, Gern L, Nuttall PA. Co-feeding ticks: epidemiological significance for Tick-borne pathogen transmission. Parasitology Today. 1996;12:472–479. doi: 10.1016/s0169-4758(96)10072-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Labuda M et al. Tick-borne encephalitis virus transmission though ticks co-feeding on specific immune natural rodent hosts. Virology. 1997;235:138–143. doi: 10.1006/viro.1997.8622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hudson PJ et al. Tick-borne encephalitis virus in northern Italy: molecular analysis, relationships with density and seasonal dynamics of Ixodes ricinus. Medical and Veterinary Entomology. 2001;15:304–313. doi: 10.1046/j.0269-283x.2001.00317.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Labuda M et al. Tick-borne encephalitis virus foci in Slovakia. International Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2002;291:43–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Perkins SE et al. Localized deer absence leads to tick amplification. Ecology. 2006;87:1981–1986. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1981:ldaltt]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Geist V. Deer of the World: Their Evolution, Behavior, and Ecology. Mechanicsburg, PA: Stackpole Books; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Matuschka FR et al. Diversionary role of Hoofed game in the transmission of Lyme Disease Spirochetes. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1993;48:693–699. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1993.48.693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Süss J et al. Epidemiology and ecology of tick-borne encephalitis in the eastern part of Germany between 1960 and 1990 and studies on the dynamics of a natural focus of tick-borne encephalitis. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie. 1992;277:224–235. doi: 10.1016/s0934-8840(11)80617-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gerth HJ et al. Roe deer as sentinels for endemicity of tick-borne encephalitis virus. Epidemiology and Infection. 1995;115:355–365. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800058477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Skarphédinsson S, Jensen PM, Kristiansen K. Survey of tick-borne infections in Denmark. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2005;11:1055–1061. doi: 10.3201/eid1107.041265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chemini C et al. Ixodes ricinus (Acari: Ixodidae) infestation on roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in Trentino, Italian Alps. Parassitologia. 1997;39:59–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hewison AJM, Vincent JP, Reby D., Andersen R, Duncan P, Linnell JDC. The European Roe Deer: the Biology of Success. Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press; 1998. Social organisation of European roe deer; pp. 189–219. , pp. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gilot B et al. The colonization of forested areas by Ixodes ricinus (Linné, 1758) in France: use of the roe deer, Capreolus capreolus (L. 1758) as a biological marker [in French] Parasite. 1994;1:81–86. doi: 10.1051/parasite/1994011081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Manilla G. Fauna d'Italia. Acari Ixodida, vol. XXXVI. Bologna, Italy: Edizioni Calderini; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Neteler M. Time series processing of MODIS satellite data for landscape epidemiological applications. International Journal of Geoinformatics. 2005;1:133–138. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.R Development Core Team. R: A language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2006. . Version 2.3.1. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Neteler M, Mitasova H. Open Source GIS: A GRASS GIS Approach. 3rd edn. New York: Springer; 2007. p. 424. , pp. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.R package 2006. . ‘MASS’, version 7.2-31.
  • 37.Randolph SE et al. An empirical quantitative framework for the seasonal population dynamics of the tick Ixodes ricinus. International Journal for Parasitology. 2002;32:979–989. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(02)00030-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference. 2nd edn. New York: Springer; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rosà R et al. Temporal variation of Ixodes ricinus intensity on the rodent host Apodemus flavicollis in relation to local climate and host dynamics. Vector Borne and Zoonotic Diseases. 2007;7:285–295. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2006.0607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rosà R, Morand S, Krasnov BR, Poulin R Micromammals and Macroparasites. Tokyo: Springer; 2006. Models for host-macroparasite interactions in micromammals; pp. 319–348. , pp. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Epidemiology and Infection are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES