Skip to main content
Epidemiology and Infection logoLink to Epidemiology and Infection
. 2008 Jan 23;136(12):1684–1690. doi: 10.1017/S0950268807000283

Sporadic community-acquired Legionnaires' disease in France: a 2-year national matched case-control study

D CHE 1,*, C CAMPESE 1, P SANTA-OLALLA 1,2, G JACQUIER 1, D BITAR 1, P BERNILLON 1, J-C DESENCLOS 1
PMCID: PMC2870779  PMID: 18211725

SUMMARY

Legionnaires' disease (LD) is an aetiology of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia in adults, with a high case-fatality ratio (CFR). We conducted a matched case-control study to identify risk factors for sporadic, community-acquired LD. Cases of sporadic, community-acquired and biologically confirmed LD, in metropolitan France from 1 September 2002 to 31 September 2004, were matched with a control subject according to age, sex, underlying illness and location of residence within 5 km. We performed a conditional logistic regression on various host-related factors and exposures. Analysis was done on 546 matched pairs. The CFR was 3·5%. Age ranged from 18–93 years (mean 57 years), with a 3·6 male:female sex ratio. Cases were more likely to have smoked with the documentation of a dose-effect relation, to have travelled with a stay in a hotel (OR 6·1, 95% CI 2·6–14·2), or to have used a wash-hand basin for personal hygiene (OR 3·5, 95% CI 1·6–7·7) than controls. Tobacco and travel have been previously described as risk factors for LD, but this is the first time that such a dose-effect for tobacco has been documented among sporadic cases. These findings will provide helpful knowledge about LD and help practitioners in identifying patients at high risk.

INTRODUCTION

Legionnaires' disease (LD) is an atypical pneumonia caused by bacteria of the genus Legionella [1, 2], which is an environmental microorganism found in soil and water. LD is a well described aetiology of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia in adults [36], with a high case-fatality ratio (CFR) (10–30%) [79]. Inhalation of aerosolized water containing Legionella is the primary mode of acquiring LD. Knowledge about risk factors derives mainly from outbreak studies [1, 10, 11], case series [1214] or studies comparing cases of pneumonia due to Legionella with cases due to other bacteria [15]. Advanced age, smoking, immunosuppressive medication, chronic underlying illness such as end-stage renal disease, chronic lung disease and cancer were identified as factors that increase the risk of being infected after exposure. Nevertheless, little is known about the specific risk factors for sporadic, community-acquired LD, which account for more than 50% of the cases notified every year in France [16] and in other developed countries [17]. The number of published studies conducted on risk factors for community-acquired LD is limited [1820], and conclusions are difficult to draw because of different study designs and methodology. Furthermore, a recent paper showed that sporadic cases were more severe and more often associated with a poor outcome when compared to outbreak cases [21], thus reinforcing the need for early detection of cases. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for sporadic, community-acquired LD related to the hosts, their activities and the environment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Source of information

In France, mandatory notification of LD was established in 1987. Physicians and microbiologists are required to notify confirmed and probable cases of LD to the district health officers who in turn notify the national health authority (Institut de Veille Sanitaire). The number of cases notified has increased over the years, especially since the introduction of urinary antigen tests in 1997. The sensitivity of the system also increased over the same period [22]. In 2002, 1021 cases of LD were notified, corresponding to an estimated incidence of 1·7/100 000 inhabitants [23].

Study design

We used a prospective matched case-control study to assess the relationship between the occurrence of LD and outcome variables.

Case definition

A confirmed case of LD was defined as a person who had a radiographically confirmed pneumonia and laboratory evidence of infection with Legionella [i.e. isolation of Legionella from respiratory secretions, detection of Legionella pneumophila sg 1 antigens in urine, or a minimum fourfold rise (to ⩾128) in antibody titres to Legionella in convalescent serum compared with acute serum]. A sporadic case of LD was defined as a case that was not part of an identified outbreak. Patients known to have been hospitalized for at least 1 day during the 10 days prior to the onset of the disease or to have lived in a medicalized nursing home were assumed to have infections that were possibly nosocomial and were excluded from this study.

Selection of respondents

Cases were identified through the mandatory notification system. All were asked by local health officers to participate. Cases who agreed to participate completed a consent form and were interviewed by local health officers through a phone standardized questionnaire within 15 days of the onset of the disease. If the case was unable to answer (e.g. because of death, or hospitalization in an intensive care unit requiring mechanical ventilation), a relative was asked to complete the consent form and to answer the questionnaire. Controls were selected by the general practitioners of the cases among their patients and interviewed by phone by the data manager of the study (at the national level) using the same questionnaire as for cases. One control per case was matched according to sex, age (within 10 years for cases aged <65 years, and within 5 years for cases aged ⩾65 years), underlying conditions (absence of underlying illness; chronic disorders such as chronic pulmonary or renal disease; immunosuppressive conditions defined as the use of corticosteroid or receipt of chemotherapy, or AIDS) and location of residence (within 5 km). Controls with a history of pneumonia during the month prior to the interview were excluded.

Questions related to the 10-day period prior to the onset of the disease for cases and to the 10-day period prior to the interview for controls. In order to minimize recall bias and in order to avoid differing seasonal exposure for cases and their controls, controls were interviewed during the month following the onset of symptoms of their matched case. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés.

Assuming an exposure rate varying from 10% to 70% among control subjects, a two-tailed significance level of 5%, and a power level of 80%, the enrolment of 600 cases and 600 controls was expected to permit detection of a minimal odds ratio (OR) of 1·5.

Cases meeting inclusion criteria and with onset of symptoms from 1 September 2002 to 31 September 2004 were included.

Variables studied

Variables were collected in order to document the individual health status (oxygen use, smoking status, alcohol intake, etc.), the environment (home setting, origin of drinking water, type and age of water heaters, etc.) and the professional and leisure activities (profession, history of travel and type of accommodation, gardening, aquatic sport, outdoor activities, exposure to water aerosols, etc.).

Seven categories were defined to characterize cases and controls according to their smoking status: non-smokers, ex-smokers (number of years of exposure ⩽20 years or >20 years) and current smokers (number of years of exposure ⩽20 years or >20 years, and number of cigarettes smoked ⩽20 per day or >20 per day) [2426]. Alcohol abuse was defined as the consumption of more than three units of alcohol per day for a man, and more than two units for a woman, considering a higher risk of LD for heavy drinkers as previously described [18, 19]. Some variables previously identified as increasing the risk of being infected were also collected, such as living near excavation sites [19] or recent residential plumbing repairs [20].

Statistical analysis

Data were entered into Epi-Info, version 6 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA). Crude association was determined by estimating the OR and its 95% confidence interval (CI). This was done by univariate conditional logistic regression, to account for the matched design. OR significance was assessed by the Wald test. A conditional logistic regression analysis, using EGRET® software (Egret for Windows 2.0.2, Cytel Software Corp., Cambridge, MA, USA) was performed, which included variables identified by the univariate analysis as being associated with LD, using a conservative threshold of P⩽0·20. A backward-step selection procedure was used to obtain the best model, and adjusted ORs (aORs) were reported. In order to limit the potential bias which may be associated with undocumented confounding variables, the results were adjusted for socio-professional categories. Interactions in the final model were tested.

In order to assess whether biases may have been introduced in selecting cases, the cases of LD included in the analysis were compared to cases that were registered in the national LD database but not included because of refusal, delay in responding, etc.

RESULTS

Between 1 September 2002 and 31 September 2004, 602 cases and 602 controls were recruited and interviewed. Matching criteria were not consistent for 56 pairs, and the remaining 546 matching pairs were finally included in the analysis. The 56 excluded cases did not differ significantly from the 546 included cases in terms of age, sex and underlying conditions.

For the 546 cases, the mean age was 57 years and the male:female sex ratio was 3·6 (428 men and 118 women). Underlying illness was identified in 29% of cases (22·5% with chronic disorders and 6·5% with immunosuppression). Nineteen cases had died before the interview (3·5%) and relatives were interviewed.

Urinary antigen detection of L. pneumophila sg 1 was positive for 510 cases (93·4%), L. pneumophila was isolated from the sputum of 73 cases (13·4%) and seroconversion was detected in 61 (11·2%). L. pneumophila sg 1 accounted for 94·5% of the isolates.

During the same period of time, 1155 sporadic community-acquired cases of LD were notified through the mandatory notification system but not interviewed. These patients did not differ from those included by sex but were older (mean age 59·5 vs. 57 years, P<0·01) and the CFR was significantly higher (11·4% vs. 3·5%, P<0·01).

Univariate analysis

Analysis of host-related factors indicated that current tobacco smoking was strongly associated with LD (global Wald statistics, P<0·001) as was excessive alcohol intake (aOR 1·83, 95% CI 1·28–2·61). None of the environmental factors studied were associated with acquiring LD, except for people living in a block of flats (vs. individual home) who were at higher risk of developing LD (aOR 2·54, 95% CI 1·75–3·68). Analysis of the factors related to leisure and professional activities revealed that a history of travel with a stay in a hotel (aOR 5·40, 95% CI 3·16–9·22) or in another type of accommodation (aOR 1·89, 95% CI 1·28–2·78) in the 10-day period prior to the onset of the disease were associated with LD. People who exclusively used a wash-hand basin for their personal hygiene were at higher risk of LD when compared to other people included (aOR 1·96, 95% CI 1·21–3·17). These were older (mean age 68·9 vs. 55·3 years, P<0·01) and more often affected by chronic disease or immunosuppression (54·3% vs. 26·5%, P<0·01) than other cases included in the analysis.

Other environment and leisure variables significantly associated with a lower risk of developing LD are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Univariate analysis of environmental and leisure risk factors for sporadic community-acquired Legionnaires' disease, September 2002 to September 2004, France

graphic file with name S0950268807000283_tab1.jpg

aOR, Adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Multivariate analysis

In the multivariate analysis, current tobacco exposure and travelling during the 10-day period prior to the onset of disease remained significantly associated with LD (Table 2). Smoking was a dose-dependent risk factor: cases who smoked >20 cigarettes per day for >20 years were at higher risk (aOR 25·2, 95% CI 7·7–82·4). The odds of illness among travellers increased, with those who stayed in a hotel having a greater risk (aOR 6·10, 95% CI 2·62–14·21) than those who stayed in another type of accommodation (aOR, 2·95, 95% CI 1·54–5·67). The exclusive use of a wash-hand basin for personal hygiene also remained a risk factor in the final model (aOR 3·48, 95% CI 1·57–7·72). Interaction terms were not included in this model, because they were not statistically significant on inclusion in the final model.

Table 2.

Multivariate analysis of risk factors for sporadic community-acquired Legionnaires' disease, September 2002 to September 2004, France

graphic file with name S0950268807000283_tab2.jpg

DISCUSSION

This study is the first carried out in France investigating factors associated with sporadic community-acquired LD. The risk of developing LD increases with smoking, the numbers of cigarettes smoked per day, and lifetime smoking with a dose-dependent effect. The results also document an association between LD and a history of travel, more particularly with a stay in a hotel during the period of exposure. And finally, the exclusive use of a wash-hand basin for personal hygiene is associated with an increased risk of LD. The multivariate analysis did not show an association between alcohol consumption and LD.

These results confirm the conclusions of several analyses which highlighted the role of tobacco in the development of LD [1820] and described a dose-dependent effect as previously documented by Storch et al. [19]. However, this dose-dependent effect that combines both number of cigarettes smoked [19] and lifetime smoking had not been documented to date for sporadic community-acquired LD, but only during outbreaks [26] or when considering other respiratory infections [24, 25, 27, 28]. The lifetime smoking seems not to be the most important factor to consider, as the risk is not different between non-smokers and ex-smokers, whatever the duration of their exposure. This dose-dependent effect is in accordance with the known physiopathological mechanisms contributing to an increased sensitivity to respiratory infections among smokers. Tobacco smoking reduces the number of cilia of the laryngeal epithelium and weakens their activity, allowing the persistence of microorganisms in the laryngeal tract [29]. In parallel, an abnormal mucociliary clearance [30], and an increased bacterial adherence in smokers compared to that of non-smokers [31] may also contribute to an increased susceptibility to bacterial pneumonia.

One of the first published case-control studies on LD identified alcohol consumption as a risk factor for sporadic community-acquired LD [19]. Excessive alcohol consumption was defined as the consumption of at least three alcohol units per day (regardless of gender). Since that time, and despite heterogenous case definitions, analysis on sporadic community-acquired cases or on cases linked to outbreaks, has not shown any association between the consumption of alcohol and LD [10, 18, 26, 32]. However, some exploratory studies showed the potential role of alcohol in community-acquired pneumonia [5, 33, 34] and it would be of particular interest to further study the physiopathological mechanisms which could explain the differences observed and the impact of alcohol on the ability of Legionella to grow, particularly in the macrophages [35].

Another important result of this study is the significant association between a history of travel and LD. This association had already been suggested [20] and documented [18, 19] but the type of accommodation was not previously taken into account. Our results highlight that staying at a hotel during the 10-day period prior to the onset of disease is significantly associated with LD. Several studies showed that the proportion of water supplies colonized by Legionella was more important in temporary accommodations than in residential settings [3638]. Similarly, data from the European network (EWGLI) show a high proportion of temporary accommodations (including hotels) for which the investigations report high Legionella contaminations [>1000 colony forming units per litre (c.f.u./l)] [39].

A recent study analysed the level of contamination of the residential hot water supply of 44 LD patients who had travelled during the 10-day period preceding the symptoms (or for which the residence was not inhabited) [40]. These results were compared with those obtained in the residence of 44 LD patients who had not travelled (or for which the residence was occupied). Although non-significant, Legionella were present more often in traveller's homes. This suggests that LD could be due to an exposure when returning from travel. The questionnaire of our study did not allow a precise analysis of the chronology of the travel in relation to the incubation period. In the future, it will be necessary to document these events in order to determine if the risk is related to the travel itself or to the exposure when returning home.

The last identified risk factor for sporadic community-acquired LD is the use of a wash-hand basin for personal hygiene. This result must be interpreted with caution, as data on Legionella contamination in tap water was not available. LD occurs frequently in weakened persons, and the very limited number of cases described relating to tap water were always among the immunosuppressed [41, 42]. It is probable that this risk applies to a particular subgroup of the population and cannot be generalized. Indeed, cases using the wash-hand basin were older and more often had underlying illness such as chronic disorders and immunosuppression than other cases included.

Being the owner of one's home, gardening, using water under pressure or spraying home plants are associated with a lower risk of LD. As for the variable concerning the use of a wash-hand basin, one can make the assumption that these variables define a particular population that may be less susceptible to LD for other reasons. The meaning of the associations observed needs to be further explored, as there may be surrogate variables for activity or physical fitness. A study conducted in Italy in order to identify potential risk factors for contamination according to distribution systems, showed that old (>10 years) water-heating systems increased the risk for Legionella contamination [43]. Even if not significant, our data analyses show that water-heating systems are more recent among home-owners (11·6 vs. 12·5 years). It will be necessary to perform complementary analyses to document the characteristics of the water-heating systems and the levels of contamination by Legionella.

The present study has some limitations. The sensitivity of the mandatory notification in place in France has improved over recent years but some cases remain unnotified [22]. Cases included in our analysis were different from those not included for age and outcome (included cases were younger and their CFR was lower). It is possible that cases included were those that were easier to interview, thus presenting a less severe form of the disease. Consequently, our results cannot be completely extrapolated to all the sporadic community-acquired cases of LD occurring in France. Cases and controls were matched according to their underlying condition. Complementary studies would be necessary to better characterize these risk factors. For example, exposure to anti-tumour necrosis factor drugs (e.g. for the treatment of Crohn's disease) was not documented in our study whereas a recent paper highlights the association with LD [44]. Finally, some confounding variables may have been missed. The exploratory design of the analysis aimed to test a large number of variables and consequently, increased the chance of wrong conclusions, which may explain some results observed (wash-hand basin and surrogate variables for activity or physical fitness).

LD remains an important cause of pneumonia with high mortality. Diagnosis and treatment need to be targeted to patients at increased risk for illness and prevention measures must be focused on risk settings or where there are people at higher risk. The identification of a dose-dependent effect for tobacco is an important finding of this study, as well as the documentation of a greater risk for people with a travel history, particularly with a stay in a hotel. At the same time, research efforts are still needed to better understand the ecology of Legionella and its ability to grow within human-made aquatic environments, the environmental factors influencing viability and spread of Legionella within aerosols, and the relation between clinical presentation and severity of illness.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was supported by a grant from Electricité de France, Service des études médicales (EDF). We thank France Wallet for her support, Lisa King for her valuable review, Christine Cambrezy for assistance in data management, the local health officers who notified and interviewed cases and all the general practitioners who were involved in the inclusion of controls. Institut de Veille Sanitaire, is funded by Ministry of Health, France; European Programme for Intervention Epidemiology Training (EPIET) is funded by the European Commission (DG SANCO).

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Fraser DW et al. Legionnaires' disease: description of an epidemic of pneumonia. New England Journal of Medicine. 1977;297:1189–1197. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197712012972201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.McDade JE et al. Legionnaires' disease: isolation of a bacterium and demonstration of its role in other respiratory disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 1977;297:1197–1203. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197712012972202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Huang HH et al. Community-acquired pneumonia in Shanghai, China: microbial etiology and implications for empirical therapy in a prospective study of 389 patients. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 2006;25:369–374. doi: 10.1007/s10096-006-0146-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Marrie TJ. Community-acquired pneumonia. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 1994;18:501–513. doi: 10.1093/clinids/18.4.501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ruiz M et al. Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia: impact of age, comorbidity, and severity. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 1999;160:397–405. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.160.2.9808045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Woodhead MA. Community-acquired pneumonia in Europe: causative pathogens and resistance patterns. European Respiratory Journal. 2002;20:20s–27s. doi: 10.1183/09031936.02.00702002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gacouin A et al. Severe pneumonia due to Legionella pneumophila: prognostic factors, impact of delayed appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Intensive Care Medicine. 2002;28:686–691. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1304-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lettinga KD et al. Legionnaires' disease at a Dutch flower show: prognostic factors and impact of therapy. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2002;8:1448–1454. doi: 10.3201/eid0812.020035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Muder RR, Yu VL, Fang GD. Community-acquired Legionnaires' disease. Seminars in Respiratory Infections. 1989;4:32–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nguyen TM et al. A community-wide outbreak of legionnaires disease linked to industrial cooling towers – how far can contaminated aerosols spread? Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2006;193:102–111. doi: 10.1086/498575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Monforte R et al. A community outbreak of Legionnaires' disease in Barcelona: clinical and microbiological study. Medicina Clinica (Barcelona) 1989;93:521–525. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.England AC, III, Fraser DW. Sporadic and epidemic nosocomial legionellosis in the United States. Epidemiologic features. American Journal of Medicine. 1981;70:707–711. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(81)90601-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.England AC, III et al. Sporadic legionellosis in the United States: the first thousand cases. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1981;94:164–170. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-94-2-164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Marston BJ, Lipman HB, Breiman RF. Surveillance for Legionnaires' disease. Risk factors for morbidity and mortality. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1994;154:2417–2422. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Carratala J et al. Risk factors for nosocomial Legionella pneumophila pneumonia. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 1994;149:625–629. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.149.3.8118629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Campese C et al. Cases of Legionnaires' disease in France in 2005 [in French] Bulletin Epidémiologique Hebdomadaire. 2006;26:185–188. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ricketts KD, Joseph CA. Legionnaires' disease in Europe 2003–2004. Eurosurveillance. 2005;10:256–259. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.den Boer JW, Nijhof J, Friesema I. Risk factors for sporadic community-acquired Legionnaires' disease. A 3-year national case-control study. Public Health. 2006;120:566–571. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Storch G et al. Sporadic community-acquired Legionnaires' disease in the United States. A case-control study. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1979;90:596–600. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-90-4-596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Straus WL et al. Risk factors for domestic acquisition of legionnaires disease. Ohio Legionnaires Disease Group. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1996;156:1685–1692. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sopena N et al. Sporadic and epidemic community legionellosis: two faces of the same illness. European Respiratory Journal. 2007;29(1):38–42. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00077206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nardone A et al. Repeat capture-recapture studies as part of the evaluation of the surveillance of Legionnaires' disease in France. Epidemiology and Infection. 2003;131:647–654. doi: 10.1017/s0950268803008616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Campese C et al. Cases of Legionnaires' disease in France in 2002 [in French] Bulletin Epidémiologique Hebdomadaire. 2003;32:153–155. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Almirall J et al. Proportion of community-acquired pneumonia cases attributable to tobacco smoking. Chest. 1999;116:375–379. doi: 10.1378/chest.116.2.375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Almirall J et al. Risk factors for community-acquired pneumonia in adults: a population-based case-control study. European Respiratory Journal. 1999;13:349–355. doi: 10.1183/09031936.99.13234999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Greig JE et al. An outbreak of Legionnaires' disease at the Melbourne Aquarium, April 2000: investigation and case-control studies. Medical Journal of Australia. 2004;180:566–572. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb06093.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nuorti JP et al. Cigarette smoking and invasive pneumococcal disease. Active Bacterial Core Surveillance Team. New England Journal of Medicine. 2000;342:681–689. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200003093421002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gajalakshmi V et al. Smoking and mortality from tuberculosis and other diseases in India: retrospective study of 43000 adult male deaths and 35000 controls. Lancet. 2003;362:507–515. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14109-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hirabayashi H et al. Laryngeal epithelial changes on effects of smoking and drinking. Auris Nasus Larynx. 1990;17:105–114. doi: 10.1016/s0385-8146(12)80192-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Stanley PJ et al. Effect of cigarette smoking on nasal mucociliary clearance and ciliary beat frequency. Thorax. 1986;41:519–523. doi: 10.1136/thx.41.7.519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Piatti G, Gazzola T, Allegra L. Bacterial adherence in smokers and non-smokers. Pharmacological Research. 1997;36:481–484. doi: 10.1006/phrs.1997.0255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Garcia-Fulgueiras A et al. Legionnaires' disease outbreak in Murcia, Spain. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2003;9:915–921. doi: 10.3201/eid0908.030337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ruiz M et al. Severe community-acquired pneumonia. Risk factors and follow-up epidemiology. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 1999;160:923–929. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.160.3.9901107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.de Roux A et al. Impact of alcohol abuse in the etiology and severity of community-acquired pneumonia. Chest. 2006;129:1219–1225. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.5.1219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yamamoto Y, Klein TW, Friedman H. Differential effects of ethanol on permissive versus nonpermissive macrophages infected with Legionella pneumophila. Proceedings of the Society of Experimental and Biological Medicine. 1993;203:323–327. doi: 10.3181/00379727-203-43606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Leoni E et al. Legionella waterline colonization: detection of Legionella species in domestic, hotel and hospital hot water systems. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2005;98:373–379. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02458.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Borella P et al. Legionella contamination in hot water of Italian hotels. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2005;71:5805–5813. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.10.5805-5813.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mouchtouri V et al. Risk factors for contamination of hotel water distribution systems by Legionella species. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2007;73:1489–1492. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02191-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ricketts KD, Joseph CA. The impact of new guidelines in Europe for the control and prevention of travel-associated Legionnaires' disease. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health. 2006;209:547–552. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2006.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Verhoef LP et al. Domestic exposure to legionellae for Dutch Legionnaires' disease patients. Archives of Environmental Health. 2004;59:597–603. doi: 10.1080/00039890409603439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tominaga M et al. Legionnaires' disease associated with habitual drinking of hot spring water. Internal Medicine. 2001;40:1064–1067. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.40.1064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chen YS et al. Residential water supply as a likely cause of community-acquired Legionnaires' disease in an immunocompromised host. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2002;21:706–709. doi: 10.1007/s10096-002-0815-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Borella P et al. Legionella infection risk from domestic hot water. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2004;10:457–464. doi: 10.3201/eid1003.020707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tubach F et al. Emergence of Legionella pneumophila pneumonia in patients receiving tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2006;43:e95–100. doi: 10.1086/508538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Epidemiology and Infection are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES