Abstract
Purpose of review
This review provides an overview of Staphylococcus epidermidis bacteremia/sepsis and Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) infections in neonates and children.
Recent findings
The incidence of S. epidermidis and CoNS sepsis in neonates is still very high and preventing and treating disease remains difficult. There has been recent progress in understanding pathogenesis of S. epidermidis infection, interaction of S. epidermidis with host defenses, and risk factors for the development of S. epidermidis disease. For example, we have gained more insight into the development of biofilm-associated catheter infections, which are responsible for recurrent CoNS infections in hospitalized premature neonates and are especially difficult to treat owing to intrinsic resistance of biofilms to antibiotics.
Summary
Biofilm-associated catheter infections by S. epidermidis occur frequently in neonates and adults. S. epidermidis bloodstream infections are particularly problematic in neonates. Prophylaxis in the form of eradicating colonizing S. epidermidis may be a double-edged sword, as S. epidermidis colonization may be beneficial to the host. New drugs may arise from a better understanding of S. epidermidis virulence and analysis of risk factors may help identify neonates susceptible to bacterial sepsis. However, reducing morbidity should always begin by increasing hygiene in hospital settings to reduce the introduction of potentially harmful opportunistic pathogens such as S. epidermidis on indwelling medical devices or during surgery.
Keywords: Staphylococcus epidermidis, neonates, sepsis, biofilm, nosocomial infections
Introduction
Staphylococcus epidermidis is found ubiquitously on healthy human skin and mucosal surfaces [1], readily colonizing newborns [2] and remaining part of the normal microflora throughout life [3]. S. epidermidis belongs to a group of staphylococcal species that are unable to produce free coagulase (collectively known as coagulase-negative staphylococci [CoNS]). S. epidermidis is the most commonly isolated etiological agent of nosocomial infections [4••]. Critically-ill patients who are immune-compromised [5, 6] and premature neonates admitted into neonatal intensive care units (NICU)s [7, 8] are the most vulnerable to CoNS infections. S. epidermidis rarely causes infections in healthy tissue [9] but has a pronounced ability to proliferate on surfaces of indwelling medical devices after surgical insertion [10], where it forms persistent multilayered agglomerations called biofilms. As biofilms are intrinsically resistant to antibiotics [11], biofilm-associated infections are a notorious burden on the increased duration of hospital admissions [12], medical resources [13] and healthcare costs [14, 15], which are estimated at US$ 2 billion annually in the US alone [16, 17••].
Here we review CoNS infections in neonates with a focus on S. epidermidis and explore recent findings that may help elucidate the complex relationship S. epidermidis has with its host and why S. epidermidis continues to be one of the most successful nosocomial pathogens.
CoNS-associated clinical sepsis in neonates
Nosocomial infection rates in neonates vary from 6% to 50% in the United States alone [18, 19] with greater incidences of infection reported internationally [20, 21]. Many nosocomial infections in neonates are catheter-related, because critically ill infants require the delivery of nutrients and drugs over long periods of time [22, 23]; and IV access, the most direct way of delivering fluids, typically involves the use of central venous catheters (CVCs). A disadvantage of long-term catheter use in neonates is that bloodstream infections (BSIs), caused primarily by CoNS such as S. epidermidis, are a common occurrence and responsible for significant global morbidity and deaths in very low-birth-weight infants (VLBW; < 1500g) [13, 24]. In contrast, term infants are only rarely infected [24, 25].
The skin insertion site and the catheter hub are the most important sources of catheter colonization. From the contaminated hub, the organisms may migrate along the surface of the catheter [26] and enter the bloodstream, which causes acute late-onset sepsis infections. Clinical features of late-onset (after 72 h post-birth) CoNS-associated sepsis are not consistent between neonates and range in severity [27]. Clinical symptoms among neonates include breathing difficulties, a drop in heart-rate to less than 100 beats per minute, fever, metabolic acidosis, feeding intolerance and abdominal distension [28].
CoNS and S. epidermidis are extremely capable of adhering to catheters and forming biofilms [29]. In addition to intrinsically high resistance of biofilms to antibiotics, specific antibiotic resistance in S. epidermidis clinical isolates, in particular to methicillin (methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis, MRSE), is widespread and complicates treatment [30]. A positive culture, whether obtained from blood, spinal fluid, or urine, is used to determine the presence of a nosocomial infection. More stringent measures include a positive identification from the catheter hub and a peripheral vessel as well as a positive blood culture [31]. PCR may serve to substantiate conclusions. However, contamination of samples can occur at the time of sampling or during processing because of the ubiquitous presence of S. epidermidis on the skin of health care and laboratory personnel [32]. This may account for the large variances in identification and report of S. epidermidis and other CoNS between laboratories [33]. Furthermore, although CoNS are most frequently isolated from BSIs, other micro-organisms are also sometimes detected along with CoNS [34].
S. epidermidis is a highly divergent species [35]. Many isolates belong to sequence type ST2 [32, 36]. Of interest, a recent study suggested that many S. epidermidis isolates are shared between infants and nurses in NICUs [37], although no direct correlation has been found associating these circulating strains with ST2. Why ST2 is so prevalent is unknown.
Risk factors for infection in neonates
Several factors may contribute to increased susceptibility to infection in pre-term compared to term neonates. CoNS- and S. epidermidis-associated BSIs are particularly prevalent among infants weighing less than 1500 g at birth (VLBW infants) and neonates with low gestational age [13]. VLBW infants are more likely to stay longer in the NICUs and require treatment and nutrition via CVCs. Nutrition formulae that immature neonates receive when administered into NICUs (TPNs, total parenteral nutrition) contain polyunsaturated fatty acids (PFAs) [38], which provide an important alternative to glucose as sources of energy [39]. However, not all premature neonates can fully utilize PFAs and thus they may accumulate in the neonate [40]. This is of special importance because peroxidation of the lipids to form toxic hydroperoxides may occur within the TPN emulsion [41] or in activated neutrophils [42]. Historically, the use of TPNs in premature neonates has been associated with increased CoNS-associated bacteremia [12], which may be attributed to impaired functions of cells of the immune system [43]. In pre-term neonates, PFAs may further reduce the function of neutrophils, which already have decreased killing capacities [44] and reduced ability to initiate the oxidative burst in response to bacterial stimulation [45] compared to those of term neonates and adults.
Interaction of S. epidermidis with innate host defense
The innate immune system is a non-selective protective barrier, consisting of different types of immune cells, humoral and other proteinaceous factors (such as antimicrobial peptides, AMPs) as well as epidermal and mucosal surfaces, that protect against invading microbial pathogens [46]. When bacteria enter the bloodstream, the host innate immune system immediately responds with an influx of immune cells to the site of infection. Neutrophils are the main type of leukocyte found in blood and play a key effector role against S. aureus infection in vitro and in vivo [47, 48]. In addition, they are efficient at clearing developing biofilms by S. aureus by phagocytosis [49] but less so biofilms produced by S. epidermidis in vitro [50]. Upon phagocytosis, neutrophil bacterial killing is mediated by oxidative and non-oxidative mechanisms in the phagosome [51].
TLRs are a group of receptors that recognize universal, highly conserved microbial antigens (pathogen-associated molecular patterns [PAMPs]). TLR activation leads to the up-regulation of immune defense systems that include phagocytosis and cytokine release [52]. In particular, TLR2 plays a key role in the recognition of Gram-positive pathogens by detecting Gram-positive cell wall components, such as lipoproteins [53]. On the other hand, hyper-stimulation of TLR2 through administration of Pam2Cys (a TLR2 agonist) decreases neutrophil levels in vivo, which leads to more severe sepsis in mice with multiple pathogens including S. aureus [54•].
TLR2 has also been reported to recognize specific S. epidermidis antigens, namely phenol soluble modulins (PSMs) [55] and poly-N-acetylglucosamine (PNAG; also known as polysaccharide intercellular adhesin; PIA) [56]). However, these findings need to be confirmed using defined genetic deletion strains, as it is possible that contaminating lipopeptides or other substances were the underlying cause of the detected pro-inflammatory effects. Accordingly, recent findings indicate PSMs are recognized predominantly by a receptor other than TLR2 (A. Peschel, personal communication).
While the level of TLR2 activation during staphylococcal sepsis may have a crucial role in determining the outcome of disease, the functional consequences of neonatal TLR activation in immune cells are very different from those in adults, as demonstrated by decreased production of TLR2-dependent cytokines [57]. In addition, neonatal immune cells are less capable of producing multiple cytokines simultaneously in response to TLR stimulation [58]. In neonates, there is enhanced TLR2 expression on monocytes and granulocytes over the course of neonatal sepsis [59]. In addition, phagocytosis of S. aureus and S. epidermidis causes neutrophil apoptosis in vitro [50]. A combination of these factors mayexplain why neutropenia is observed during sepsis in sick VLBW infants [60].
Lipoteichoic acid (LTA), a highly conserved epitope in the staphylococcal cell wall that has antiphagocytic properties [61, 62], induces the cytokine cascade through stimulation of TLR2 [63]. However, LTA is also responsible for inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokine production in keratinocytes in a TLR2 dependent manner [64••]. Skin damage will undoubtedly occur when catheters are being inserted and TLR2-dependent inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokine production would allow S. epidermidis to adhere, proliferate and migrate along catheters with minimum interference from host defenses.
A shorter secreted form of LTA, known as “lipid S” from S. epidermidis, has been described [65] with significant pro-inflammatory properties [66]. However, it appears that during the biochemical characterization of “lipid S”, data were misinterpreted and “lipid S” signals and pro-inflammatory capacity are attributable to PSM-mec, a recently discovered phenol soluble modulin (PSM) [67••].
Mannose-binding lectin (MBL) is a pattern recognition receptor that recognizes carbohydrate moieties on the surface of a wide range of microorganisms [68]. It is thought to be a primary host defense mechanism against CoNS species [69]. Although MBL affinity to S. epidermidis is significantly reduced compared to that of S. aureus [68], the MBL and classical complement pathways are indispensable for mediating rapid PMN-phagocytic killing of S. epidermidis in suspension [70, 71•]. Furthermore, deficiencies in complement factor C3 and IgG, essential factors for activation of the complement cascade, have been related to greater risk for CoNS-associated sepsis in neonates [72]. Whether there is an association between low circulating MBL levels and increased risk of infection in neonates [73, 74] remains to be addressed.
S. epidermidis and acquired host defense
Bacterial infiltration first activates neutrophils and other phagocytes to produce cytokines. Eventually, a more specific acquired immune response is induced by T cells, which have an important role in determining the type of immune response against the invading pathogen.
In an S. aureus sepsis mouse model, high levels of T-helper (Th) 2 polarizing cytokines such as IL-4 and IL-10 were detected [75]. Th2 cells play a prominent role in neutralizing extracellular microorganisms by stimulating B-cells for antibody production [76]. Thus, antibody-mediated responses may also be important in controlling S. epidermidis and CoNS sepsis infections. Interestingly, whole blood from term neonates can be as efficient at producing cytokines compared to that of adults in response to in vitro stimulation with S. epidermidis [77•]. Generally, production of cytokines is significantly lower as a response to S. epidermidis compared to S. aureus [78, 79•]. However, in chronic S. epidermidis biofilm-associated infections, a cellular immune response may be initiated as indicated by the production of high levels of IL-1β, IL-12 and gamma interferon (IFN-γ) by human leukocytes in an in vitro biofilm model [80].
The importance of T cells in controlling S. epidermidis infection was recently evaluated in an in vivo catheter infection mouse model [81•]. Nu/Nu mice (athymic and T-cell deficient but B-cell and natural killer cell positive) were most susceptible toward S. epidermidis biofilm infections. These data support the notion that patients with immune deficiencies may be more prone to recurrent S. epidermidis biofilm-associated infections [82, 83].
S. epidermidis pathogenesis
There is increased recent interest in the mechanisms by which S. epidermidis can persist and cause infection. Unlike its close relative S. aureus, S. epidermidis produces only a fraction of secreted virulence factors such as toxins and degradative exoenzymes [4]. S. epidermidis invasive strains appear to be predominantly of ST2; and some genetic factors seem to be correlated with invasiveness, such as the insertion element IS256 and the ica genes encoding the PNAG/PIA immune evasion and biofilm exopolysacccharide [84, 85]. The insertion element IS256 is believed to contribute to genetic adaption that may have a role during infection [86]. Many of the virulence factors of S. epidermidis have been recently reviewed [4]. Therefore, the following sections will specifically address virulence factors with a putative role in S. epidermidis neonatal infection.
Putative virulence determinants involved in neonatal sepsis
Necrotizing enterocolitis is a highly fatal disease which occurs in 5–10% in VLBW neonates [87]. Clinical symptoms of necrotizing enterocolitis include apnea, desaturations, bradycardia, lethargy and temperature instability and complications with the patient’s gastrointestinal tract [88]. How bacteria induce necrotizing enterocolitis still remains elusive. It has been suggested that other virulent microorganisms may damage the intestinal epithelium [87], which would allow S. epidermidis and CoNS to disseminate into the blood [89]. Furthermore, production of delta-toxin was implicated in neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis [90]. S. epidermidis delta-toxin (also known as PSMγ) is a 24 amino acid long peptide transcribed within RNAIII, the small regulatory RNA molecule that is required for virulence determinant regulation by the agr quorum-sensing system [91, 92]. The recent discovery that delta-toxin is but one member of a larger family of similar peptides with frequent cytolytic potential, the PSMs [93, 94], will require a more detailed investigation of the pathogenic potential of delta-toxin and other PSMs in necrotizing enterocolitis and other diseases. This includes the very recently identified PSM-mec, which is encoded on a transferable genetic element [67], in contrast to all other PSMs, which are encoded on the core S. epidermidis genome.
S. epidermidis and many other CoNS are protected from attacks by the immune system by specific extracellular polymers. First, the ica-encoded exopolysaccharide PNAG/PIA [95, 96] was shown to inhibit neutrophil phagocytosis and activity of AMPs, thus contributing significantly to S. epidermidis immune evasion [97, 98], in addition to its role as a structural component of the biofilm matrix. Second, poly-γ-DL-glutamic acid (PGA) has a similar function in immune evasion [99].
Putative virulence determinants involved in neonatal catheter-associated infections
Biofilm formation, a multi-stage process that occurs in four phases; attachment (adhesion), accumulation, maturation and detachment [100], is an important virulence determinant during catheter-associated infection. Bacteria that form biofilms on medical catheters are known to be notoriously difficult to eradicate [11, 101] and it has been estimated that biofilms are associated with 65% of nosocomial infections [11].
For the most part, there is a significant association of S. epidermidis clinical isolates and biofilm formation [32, 102]. PNAG/PIA is important for biofilm production in vitro and S. epidermidis strains lacking PNAG/PIA are significantly impaired in most animal models of biofilm-associated infection [103–105]. However, not all S. epidermidis clinical isolates from biofilm-associated infections, and even less from neonate BSIs, possess ica genes [106–110]. In some ica-negative S. epidermidis strains, the cell surface-located accumulation-associated protein (Aap) [111•] is involved in biofilm formation [112]. Domains within the Aap fibril-like structure [113] are thought to interact with components of PNAG/PIA thus forming a protein polysaccharide biofilm network [114]. Furthermore, PNAG/PIA-independent biofilms were documented in clinical staphylococcal isolates [115]. However, such protein-dependent biofilms are more readily disrupted indicating that both PNAG/PIA and proteins contribute to efficient S. epidermidis biofilm formation.
The production of biofilms on catheters can lead to chronic infection. Bacteria embedded in biofilms are more resistant to antibiotics compared with their planktonic free-floating counterparts [101]. Furthermore, biofilms are responsible for reduced IgG and complement deposition for neutrophil-dependent killing of S. epidermidis [71]. Moreover, as the biofilm matures, small clusters of cells may detach from the mature biofilm forming the basis for continual seeding of bacteria into the bloodstream. Accordingly, in neonates with implanted CVCs, infections frequently relapse after treatment, most likely owing to the presence of biofilms [116, 117], while neonates with CoNS late-onset sepsis can be treated relatively quickly using antibiotics [118].
Regulation of virulence in S. epidermidis
The quorum sensing regulator agr modulates the expression of many S. epidermidis genes, including several virulence factors, in response to cell density [119–121]. Since delta-toxin is transcribed within RNAIII [91, 92], the primary intracellular effector of agr, production of delta-toxin is directly linked to agr activity. PSMs other than delta-toxin are controlled by direct binding of the AgrA response regulator to their promoter regions, resulting in similarly strict control of PSM production by agr [122, 123]. Production of PSM-mec is also agr-regulated, but it is unknown whether this occurs by direct binding of AgrA to the psm-mec promoter [67].
Regulation of PNAG/PIA synthesis is subject to a range of regulatory influences [124] involving several different global virulence regulators [125, 126] and the putative quorum-sensing system luxS [127], but not agr [121]. Thicker and more compacted biofilms are formed by agr and luxS mutants when compared to the corresponding isogenic wild-type strains [127–129]. For agr, this is thought to be due to the inability of cells to detach from the mature biofilm, possibly as a result of abolished PSM production [94].
Antibiotic resistance
Frequent antibiotic resistance, in particular to methicillin (methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis, MRSE), makes S. epidermidis an important threat in nosocomial infections. The factor responsible for methicillin-resistance is the mecA gene, which is located on mobile genetic elements called the staphylococcal chromosome cassette mec (SCCmec) [130]. Many S. epidermidis isolates possess the SCCmec type IV element [131]. Due to its relatively small size [132], SCCmec type IV is thought to be advantageous for spreading promiscuously among strains in the absence of antibiotic pressure [133]. PSM-mec is encoded within SCCmec types II and III [134] and is one of the few S. epidermidis virulence determinants that can be easily passed from strain to strain [67].
The mecA gene is found in more than 90% of S. epidermidis infection isolates, indicating an extremely high incidence of MRSE [135]. Despite such high frequency of methicillin resistance, a majority of acute cases of CoNS- and S. epidermidis-associated sepsis in neonates can be treated with antibiotics such as vancomycin [24, 118] without the need of catheter removal [136]. However, relapse of infection is common in patients who retain the same catheter [116, 117]. Importantly, biofilm formation significantly decreases the activity of vancomycin and other antibiotics [117, 137]. This resistance to antibiotics by S. epidermidis may be brought on by failure of some antibiotics to penetrate the full depth of the biofilm or reduced growth and metabolism rates, which affects cell wall synthesis inhibitors and antibiotics that act on metabolic processes [11].
Future treatments and prophylactic measures against S. epidermidis
As S. epidermidis is found ubiquitously on human skin, it is of no surprise that infection is commonly due to self-contamination during the catheter insertion procedure or from the skin of hospital workers [37]. Thus, improved education of personnel in healthcare practices, such as increased frequency of hand disinfection [138, 139] has led to a reduction in the relative risk of infections [140, 141]. The use of novel technologies to prevent bacteria from adhering onto indwelling catheters and prostheses may help reduce the incidence of disease.
There are currently no anti-staphylococcal vaccines. Most efforts are targeted at S. aureus, owing to the higher severity of S. aureus-induced disease. Active immunization strategies against S. epidermidis may be problematic for several reasons, for example the fact that it is a ubiquitous human commensal. One effort aimed predominantly at CoNS, passive immunization with a vaccine consisting of monoclonal antibodies against LTA, has recently undergone clinical trials in VLBW neonates [142•]. Unfortunately, this vaccine, Pagibaximab, showed no significant reduction in incidence in CoNS infection between treated and control neonate patients, under the current immunization protocols. However, administration of the vaccine was safe and changes in Pagibaximab administration are planned for future trials. Antibodies to LTA would help antagonize its anti-phagocytic property [61]. In the future, passive immunization with neutralizing antibodies against PSMs may be worth considering in addition to using PGA or PNAG/PIA for passive or active immunization strategies.
Inhibition of the quorum sensing system agr would prevent the production of PSMs and other virulence determinants, but there are caveats [143]. First, there are different subgroups of S. epidermidis that use different signals [144] and thus one anti-quorum sensing therapeutic may not function against all S. epidermidis. Second, S. epidermidis strains with agr deletions produce thicker and more compact biofilms [129]. Although dissemination of bacteria may be impacted as a result of agr inhibition, the possibility of enhanced biofilm on catheters by S. epidermidis cannot be excluded.
Continued use of chemical antiseptics, such as chorhexidine, may serve to prevent staphylococcal contamination [145] but new antibiotics that can target novel bacterial processes, which are not involved in metabolism, would be more valuable in circumventing known antibiotic resistance mechanisms by staphylococci. All these measures would be a great benefit against catheter-associated infections in neonates. Notably, therapeutic strategies against S. epidermidis infection must omit the complete eradication of S. epidermidis as it is an important part of human microflora on the skin.
Conclusion
S. epidermidis and CoNS sepsis infections in neonates remain a significant burden to public healthcare especially with the emergence of antibiotic resistance. Realistically, eradicating S. epidermidis and CoNS is neither possible nor desirable. However, understanding the mechanisms of S. epidermidis pathogenesis will help give rise to new anti-staphylococcal therapies. Although the newly discovered PSMs will need to be evaluated in more detail for their toxic potential, S. epidermidis in general appears to lack the production of aggressive virulence factors. Rather, further strategies to inhibit biofilm formation will need to be explored to limit chronic catheter-related infections in neonates. Targeting other S. epidermidis virulence factors, such as those involved in adherence, immune evasion, or quorum sensing, requires careful consideration as the outcome may not always be beneficial for the host. This also applies to modulating the neonatal innate immune system to help control infection as neonates show different responses to adults. In addition, there still is a need to understand neonatal immune responses to pathogenic bacteria before such informed decisions can be made.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH).
References and recommended reading
Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:
•of special interest
••of outstanding interest
- 1.Aly R, Shinefield HI, Strauss WG, et al. Bacterial adherence to nasal mucosal cells. Infect Immun. 1977;17:546–549. doi: 10.1128/iai.17.3.546-549.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Keyworth N, Millar MR, Holland KT. Development of cutaneous microflora in premature neonates. Arch Dis Child. 1992;67:797–801. doi: 10.1136/adc.67.7_spec_no.797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kloos WE, Musselwhite MS. Distribution and persistence of Staphylococcus and Micrococcus species and other aerobic bacteria on human skin. Appl Microbiol. 1975;30:381–385. doi: 10.1128/am.30.3.381-395.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4••.Otto M. Staphylococcus epidermidis--the ‘accidental’ pathogen. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7:555–567. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2182. An excellent summary and discussion of research findings on S. epidermidis. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Domingo P, Fontanet A. Management of complications associated with totally implantable ports in patients with AIDS. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2001;15:7–13. doi: 10.1089/108729101460056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bearman GM, Wenzel RP. Bacteremias: a leading cause of death. Arch Med Res. 2005;36:646–659. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2005.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Donowitz LG, Haley CE, Gregory WW, et al. Neonatal intensive care unit bacteremia: emergence of gram-positive bacteria as major pathogens. Am J Infect Control. 1987;15:141–147. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(87)90137-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fallat ME, Gallinaro RN, Stover BH, et al. Centralvenous catheter bloodstream infections in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Pediatr Surg. 1998;33:1383–1387. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(98)90013-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Refsahl K, Andersen BM. Clinically significant coagulase-negative staphylococci: identification and resistance patterns. J Hosp Infect. 1992;22:19–31. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(92)90127-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Uckay I, Pittet D, Vaudaux P, et al. Foreign body infections due to Staphylococcus epidermidis. Ann Med. 2009;41:109–119. doi: 10.1080/07853890802337045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science. 1999;284:1318–1322. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5418.1318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sohn AH, Garrett DO, Sinkowitz-Cochran RL, et al. Prevalence of nosocomial infections in neonatal intensive care unit patients: Results from the first national point-prevalence survey. J Pediatr. 2001;139:821–827. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2001.119442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, et al. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics. 2002;110:285–291. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.2.285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gray JE, Richardson DK, McCormick MC, et al. Coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteremia among very low birth weight infants: relation to admission illness severity, resource use, and outcome. Pediatrics. 1995;95:225–230. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Payne NR, Carpenter JH, Badger GJ, et al. Marginal increase in cost and excess length of stay associated with nosocomial bloodstream infections in surviving very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2004;114:348–355. doi: 10.1542/peds.114.2.348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dimick JB, Pelz RK, Consunji R, et al. Increased resource use associated with catheter-related bloodstream infection in the surgical intensive care unit. Arch Surg. 2001;136:229–234. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.136.2.229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17••.Rogers KL, Fey PD, Rupp ME. Coagulase-negative staphylococcal infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2009;23:73–98. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2008.10.001. This provides an excellent review on clinical aspects of S. epidermidis infections. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Craft A, Finer N. Nosocomial coagulase negative staphylococcal (CoNS) catheter-related sepsis in preterm infants: definition, diagnosis, prophylaxis, and prevention. J Perinatol. 2001;21:186–192. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7200514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schelonka RL, Scruggs S, Nichols K, et al. Sustained reductions in neonatal nosocomial infection rates following a comprehensive infection control intervention. J Perinatol. 2006;26:176–179. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hwang JH, Choi CW, Chang YS, et al. The efficacy of clinical strategies to reduce nosocomial sepsis in extremely low birth weight infants. J Korean Med Sci. 2005;20:177–181. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2005.20.2.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tiskumara R, Fakharee SH, Liu CQ, et al. Neonatal infections in Asia. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009;94:F144–148. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.139865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Klein JF, Shahrivar F. Use of percutaneous silastic central venous catheters in neonates and the management of infectious complications. Am J Perinatol. 1992;9:261–264. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Garland JS, Alex CP, Mueller CD, et al. A randomized trial comparing povidone-iodine to a chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated dressing for prevention of central venous catheter infections in neonates. Pediatrics. 2001;107:1431–1436. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.6.1431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Isaacs D. A ten year, multicentre study of coagulase negative staphylococcal infections in Australasian neonatal units. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003;88:F89–93. doi: 10.1136/fn.88.2.F89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Carrieri MP, Stolfi I, Moro ML. Intercenter variability and time of onset: two crucial issues in the analysis of risk factors for nosocomial sepsis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003;22:599–609. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000073205.74257.a5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Garland JS, Alex CP, Sevallius JM, et al. Cohort study of the pathogenesis and molecular epidemiology of catheter-related bloodstream infection in neonates with peripherally inserted central venous catheters. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29:243–249. doi: 10.1086/526439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Patrick CC. Coagulase-negative staphylococci: pathogens with increasing clinical significance. J Pediatr. 1990;116:497–507. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)81593-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Maayan-Metzger A, Linder N, Marom D, et al. Clinical and laboratory impact of coagulase-negative staphylococci bacteremia in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 2000;89:690–693. doi: 10.1080/080352500750044016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Raad I. Intravascular-catheter-related infections. Lancet. 1998;351:893–898. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)10006-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Raad I, Alrahwan A, Rolston K. Staphylococcus epidermidis: emerging resistance and need for alternative agents. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:1182–1187. doi: 10.1086/520285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hoang V, Sills J, Chandler M, et al. Percutaneously inserted central catheter for total parenteral nutrition in neonates: complications rates related to upper versus lower extremity insertion. Pediatrics. 2008;121:e1152–1159. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Klingenberg C, Ronnestad A, Anderson AS, et al. Persistent strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci in a neonatal intensive care unit: virulence factors and invasiveness. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007;13:1100–1111. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01818.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Newby J. Nosocomial infection in neonates: inevitable or preventable? J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2008;22:221–227. doi: 10.1097/01.JPN.0000333923.45575.04. quiz 228–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bizzarro MJ, Dembry LM, Baltimore RS, et al. Matched case-control analysis of polymicrobial bloodstream infection in a neonatal intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29:914–920. doi: 10.1086/591323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Thomas JC, Vargas MR, Miragaia M, et al. Improved multilocus sequence typing scheme for Staphylococcusepidermidis. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:616–619. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01934-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Miragaia M, Thomas JC, Couto I, et al. Inferring a population structure for Staphylococcusepidermidis from multilocus sequence typing data. J Bacteriol. 2007;189:2540–2552. doi: 10.1128/JB.01484-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Milisavljevic V, Wu F, Cimmotti J, et al. Genetic relatedness of Staphylococcus epidermidis from infected infants and staff in the neonatal intensive care unit. Am J InfectControl. 2005;33:341–347. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2005.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Garnacho Montero J, Shou J, Ortiz Leyba C, et al. Lipids and immune function. Nutr Hosp. 1996;11:230–237. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Carpentier YA, Dupont IE. Advances in intravenous lipid emulsions. World J Surg. 2000;24:1493–1497. doi: 10.1007/s002680010267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Andrew G, Chan G, Schiff D. Lipid metabolism in the neonate. I. The effects of Intralipid infusion on plasma triglyceride and free fatty acid concentrations in the neonate. J Pediatr. 1976;88:273–278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hardy G, Allwood MC. Oxidation of intravenous lipid emulsions. Nutrition. 1997;13:230. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(96)00040-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wu GH, Jarstrand C, Nordenstrom J. Phagocyte-induced lipid peroxidation of different intravenous fat emulsions and counteractive effect of vitamin E. Nutrition. 1999;15:359–364. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(99)00052-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sweeney B, Puri P, Reen DJ. Induction and modulation of apoptosis in neonatal monocytes by polyunsaturated fatty acids. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42:620–628. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Schutze GE, Hall MA, Baker CJ, et al. Role of neutrophil receptors in opsonophagocytosis of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Infect Immun. 1991;59:2573–2578. doi: 10.1128/iai.59.8.2573-2578.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bjorkqvist M, Jurstrand M, Bodin L, et al. Defective neutrophil oxidative burst in preterm newborns on exposure to coagulase-negative staphylococci. Pediatr Res. 2004;55:966–971. doi: 10.1203/01.pdr.0000127018.44938.89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Dorschner RA, Lin KH, Murakami M, et al. Neonatal skin in mice and humans expresses increased levels of antimicrobial peptides: innate immunity during development of the adaptive response. Pediatr Res. 2003;53:566–572. doi: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000057205.64451.B7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Voyich JM, Braughton KR, Sturdevant DE, et al. Insights into mechanisms used by Staphylococcusaureus to avoid destruction by human neutrophils. J Immunol. 2005;175:3907–3919. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.6.3907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Miller LS, Pietras EM, Uricchio LH, et al. Inflammasome-mediated production of IL-1beta is required for neutrophil recruitment against Staphylococcus aureus in vivo. J Immunol. 2007;179:6933–6942. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.10.6933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gunther F, Wabnitz GH, Stroh P, et al. Host defence against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms infection: phagocytosis of biofilms by polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) Mol Immunol. 2009;46:1805–1813. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2009.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Guenther F, Stroh P, Wagner C, et al. Phagocytosis of staphylococci biofilms by polymorphonuclear neutrophils: S. aureus and S. epidermidis differ with regard to their susceptibility towards the host defense. Int J Artif Organs. 2009;32:565–573. doi: 10.1177/039139880903200905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Faurschou M, Borregaard N. Neutrophil granules and secretory vesicles in inflammation. Microbes Infect. 2003;5:1317–1327. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2003.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Heine H, Ulmer AJ. Recognition of bacterial products by toll-like receptors. Chem Immunol Allergy. 2005;86:99–119. doi: 10.1159/000086654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hashimoto M, Tawaratsumida K, Kariya H, et al. Not lipoteichoic acid but lipoproteins appear to be the dominant immunobiologically active compounds in Staphylococcus aureus. J Immunol. 2006;177:3162–3169. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.5.3162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54•.Navarini AA, Lang KS, Verschoor A, et al. Innate immune-induced depletion of bone marrow neutrophils aggravates systemic bacterial infections. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:7107–7112. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901162106. An important investigation showing a correlation with neutrophil depletion and exacerbation of bacterial infection (including S. aureus sepsis) as a result of excessive TLR2 activation. This may have implications for S. epidermidis bacteremia infections in neonates. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hajjar AM, O’Mahony DS, Ozinsky A, et al. Cutting edge: functional interactions between toll-like receptor (TLR) 2 and TLR1 or TLR6 in response to phenol-soluble modulin. J Immunol. 2001;166:15–19. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.1.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Stevens NT, Sadovskaya I, Jabbouri S, et al. Staphylococcus epidermidis polysaccharide intercellular adhesin induces IL-8 expression in human astrocytes via a mechanism involving TLR2. Cell Microbiol. 2009;11:421–432. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2008.01264.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Levy O, Zarember KA, Roy RM, et al. Selective impairment of TLR-mediated innate immunity in human newborns: neonatal blood plasma reduces monocyte TNF-alpha induction by bacterial lipopeptides, lipopolysaccharide, and imiquimod, but preserves the response to R-848. J Immunol. 2004;173:4627–4634. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.7.4627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kollmann TR, Crabtree J, Rein-Weston A, et al. Neonatal innate TLR-mediated responses are distinct from those of adults. J Immunol. 2009;183:7150–7160. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Viemann D, Dubbel G, Schleifenbaum S, et al. Expression of toll-like receptors in neonatal sepsis. Pediatr Res. 2005;58:654–659. doi: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000180544.02537.FD. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Sarkar S, Bhagat I, Hieber S, et al. Can neutrophil responses in very low birth weight infants predict the organisms responsible for late-onset bacterial or fungal sepsis? J Perinatol. 2006;26:501–505. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Raynor RH, Scott DF, Best GK. Lipoteichoic acid inhibition of phagocytosis of Staphylococcus aureus by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1981;19:181–189. doi: 10.1016/0090-1229(81)90061-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Grundling A, Schneewind O. Synthesis of glycerol phosphate lipoteichoic acid in Staphylococcusaureus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:8478–8483. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701821104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Michelsen KS, Aicher A, Mohaupt M, et al. The role of toll-like receptors (TLRs) in bacteria-induced maturation of murine dendritic cells (DCS). Peptidoglycan and lipoteichoic acid are inducers of DC maturation and require TLR2. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:25680–25686. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M011615200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64••.Lai Y, Di Nardo A, Nakatsuji T, et al. Commensal bacteria regulate Toll-like receptor 3-dependent inflammation after skin injury. Nat Med. 2009;15:1377–1382. doi: 10.1038/nm.2062. This is the first study to show how S. epidermidis can immuno-modulate the human host innate immune system by inhibiting pro-inflammatory cytokine release in skin keratinocytes that have detected RNA from neighboring damaged cells as a result of injury. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Lambert PA, Worthington T, Tebbs SE, et al. Lipid S, a novel Staphylococcus epidermidis exocellular antigen with potential for the serodiagnosis of infections. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2000;29:195–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2000.tb01523.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Jones KJ, Perris AD, Vernallis AB, et al. Induction of inflammatory cytokines and nitric oxide in J774.2 cells and murine macrophages by lipoteichoic acid and related cell wall antigens from Staphylococcusepidermidis. J Med Microbiol. 2005;54:315–321. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.45872-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67••.Queck SY, Khan BA, Wang R, et al. Mobile genetic element-encoded cytolysin connects virulence to methicillin resistance in MRSA. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000533. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000533. This study is the first to show a staphylococcal virulence determinant (PSM-mec) that can be passed from strain to strain via methicillin resistance SCCmec elements. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Neth O, Jack DL, Dodds AW, et al. Mannose-binding lectin binds to a range of clinically relevant microorganisms and promotes complement deposition. Infect Immun. 2000;68:688–693. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.2.688-693.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Krediet TG, Beurskens FJ, van Dijk H, et al. Antibody responses and opsonic activity in sera of preterm neonates with coagulase-negative staphylococcal septicemia and the effect of the administration of fresh frozen plasma. Pediatr Res. 1998;43:645–651. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199805000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Clark LA, Easmon CS. Opsonic requirements of Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Med Microbiol. 1986;22:1–7. doi: 10.1099/00222615-22-1-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71•.Kristian SA, Birkenstock TA, Sauder U, et al. Biofilm formation induces C3a release and protects Staphylococcus epidermidis from IgG and complement deposition and from neutrophil-dependent killing. J Infect Dis. 2008;197:1028–1035. doi: 10.1086/528992. This recent study shows that S. epidermidis biofilms protect from several important innate host defense mechanisms. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Lassiter HA, Tanner JE, Cost KM, et al. Diminished IgG, but not complement C3 or C4 or factor B, precedes nosocomial bacterial sepsis in very low birth weight neonates. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1991;10:663–668. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199109000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Dzwonek AB, Neth OW, Thiebaut R, et al. The role of mannose-binding lectin in susceptibility to infection in preterm neonates. Pediatr Res. 2008;63:680–685. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31816fdbff. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Swierzko AS, Szala A, Cedzynski M, et al. Mannan-binding lectin genotypes and genotype-phenotype relationships in a large cohort of Polish neonates. Hum Immunol. 2009;70:68–72. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2008.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Sasaki S, Nishikawa S, Miura T, et al. Interleukin-4 and interleukin-10 are involved in host resistance to Staphylococcus aureus infection through regulation of gamma interferon. Infect Immun. 2000;68:2424–2430. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.5.2424-2430.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Romagnani S. Regulation of the T cell response. Clin Exp Allergy. 2006;36:1357–1366. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2006.02606.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77•.Hartel C, Osthues I, Rupp J, et al. Characterisation of the host inflammatory response to Staphylococcus epidermidis in neonatal whole blood. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008;93:F140–145. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.124685. This is the first investigation of S epidermidis-induced cytokine production in vitro in neonates. The authors give an in-depth evaluation of immune responses induced by neonatal whole blood, confirming low in vitro pro-inflammatory response to S. epidermidis is dependent on gestational age in preterm infants. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Buzas K, Megyeri K, Miczak A, et al. Different staphylococcal strains elicit different levels of production of T-helper 1-inducing cytokines. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung. 2004;51:371–384. doi: 10.1556/AMicr.51.2004.3.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79•.Holland DB, Bojar RA, Farrar MD, et al. Differential innate immune responses of a living skin equivalent model colonized by Staphylococcus epidermidis or Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009;290:149–155. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01402.x. These authors use DNA microarrays to investigate differential gene expression of a human skin equivalent in vitro model in response to colonization by S. epidermidis or S. aureus. S. epidermidis induced significantly less immune responses in the cells compared to S. aureus. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Leid JG, Shirtliff ME, Costerton JW, et al. Human leukocytes adhere to, penetrate, and respond to Staphylococcusaureus biofilms. Infect Immun. 2002;70:6339–6345. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.11.6339-6345.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81•.Vuong C, Kocianova S, Yu J, et al. Development of real-time in vivo imaging of device-related Staphylococcus epidermidis infection in mice and influence of animal immune status on susceptibility to infection. J Infect Dis. 2008;198:258–261. doi: 10.1086/589307. This is one of few studies suggesting that specific sets of immune cells (T-cells in particular) in vivo may have an important role in controlling S. epidermidis infection. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Wade JC, Schimpff SC, Newman KA, et al. Staphylococcus epidermidis: an increasing cause of infection in patients with granulocytopenia. Ann Intern Med. 1982;97:503–508. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-97-4-503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Fleer A, Gerards LJ, Aerts P, et al. Opsonic defense to Staphylococcus epidermidis in the premature neonate. J Infect Dis. 1985;152:930–937. doi: 10.1093/infdis/152.5.930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Kozitskaya S, Cho SH, Dietrich K, et al. The bacterial insertion sequence element IS256 occurs preferentially in nosocomial Staphylococcusepidermidis isolates: association with biofilm formation and resistance to aminoglycosides. Infect Immun. 2004;72:1210–1215. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.2.1210-1215.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Li M, Wang X, Gao Q, et al. Molecular characterization of Staphylococcus epidermidis strains isolated from a teaching hospital in Shanghai, China. J Med Microbiol. 2009;58:456–461. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.007567-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Ziebuhr W, Krimmer V, Rachid S, et al. A novel mechanism of phase variation of virulence in Staphylococcus epidermidis: evidence for control of the polysaccharide intercellular adhesin synthesis by alternating insertion and excision of the insertion sequence element IS256. Mol Microbiol. 1999;32:345–356. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01353.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Lin PW, Stoll BJ. Necrotising enterocolitis. Lancet. 2006;368:1271–1283. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69525-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Thompson AM, Bizzarro MJ. Necrotizing enterocolitis in newborns: pathogenesis, prevention and management. Drugs. 2008;68:1227–1238. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200868090-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Goulet O, Sauvat F. Short bowel syndrome and intestinal transplantation in children. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2006;9:304–313. doi: 10.1097/01.mco.0000222116.68912.fc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Scheifele DW, Bjornson GL, Dyer RA, et al. Delta-like toxin produced by coagulase-negative staphylococci is associated with neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. Infect Immun. 1987;55:2268–2273. doi: 10.1128/iai.55.9.2268-2273.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Janzon L, Arvidson S. The role of the delta-lysin gene (hld) in the regulation of virulence genes by the accessory gene regulator (agr) in Staphylococcus aureus. EMBO J. 1990;9:1391–1399. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08254.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Novick RP, Ross HF, Projan SJ, et al. Synthesis of staphylococcal virulence factors is controlled by a regulatory RNA molecule. EMBO J. 1993;12:3967–3975. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb06074.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Mehlin C, Headley CM, Klebanoff SJ. An inflammatory polypeptide complex from Staphylococcus epidermidis: isolation and characterization. J Exp Med. 1999;189:907–918. doi: 10.1084/jem.189.6.907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Yao Y, Sturdevant DE, Otto M. Genomewide analysis of gene expression in Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms: insights into the pathophysiology of S. epidermidis biofilms and the role of phenol-soluble modulins in formation of biofilms. J Infect Dis. 2005;191:289–298. doi: 10.1086/426945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Mack D, Fischer W, Krokotsch A, et al. The intercellular adhesin involved in biofilm accumulation of Staphylococcus epidermidis is a linear beta-1,6-linked glucosaminoglycan: purification and structural analysis. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:175–183. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.1.175-183.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Heilmann C, Schweitzer O, Gerke C, et al. Molecular basis of intercellular adhesion in the biofilm-forming Staphylococcusepidermidis. Mol Microbiol. 1996;20:1083–1091. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1996.tb02548.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Vuong C, Kocianova S, Voyich JM, et al. A crucial role for exopolysaccharide modification in bacterial biofilm formation, immune evasion, and virulence. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:54881–54886. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M411374200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Vuong C, Voyich JM, Fischer ER, et al. Polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) protects Staphylococcus epidermidis against major components of the human innate immune system. Cell Microbiol. 2004;6:269–275. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2004.00367.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Kocianova S, Vuong C, Yao Y, et al. Key role of poly-gamma-DL-glutamic acid in immune evasion and virulence of Staphylococcusepidermidis. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:688–694. doi: 10.1172/JCI23523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100•.Otto M. Staphylococcal biofilms. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2008;322:207–228. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-75418-3_10. Recent review on the molecular biology of staphylococcal biofilm formation. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Gilbert P, Das J, Foley I. Biofilm susceptibility to antimicrobials. Adv Dent Res. 1997;11:160–167. doi: 10.1177/08959374970110010701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Klingenberg C, Aarag E, Ronnestad A, et al. Coagulase-negative staphylococcal sepsis in neonates. Association between antibiotic resistance, biofilm formation and the host inflammatory response. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005;24:817–822. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000176735.20008.cd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Rupp ME, Ulphani JS, Fey PD, et al. Characterization of the importance of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin/hemagglutinin of Staphylococcus epidermidis in the pathogenesis of biomaterial-based infection in a mouse foreign body infection model. Infect Immun. 1999;67:2627–2632. doi: 10.1128/iai.67.5.2627-2632.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Francois P, Tu Quoc PH, Bisognano C, et al. Lack of biofilm contribution to bacterial colonisation in an experimental model of foreign body infection by Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003;35:135–140. doi: 10.1016/S0928-8244(02)00463-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Fluckiger U, Ulrich M, Steinhuber A, et al. Biofilm formation, icaADBC transcription, and polysaccharide intercellular adhesin synthesis by staphylococci in a device-related infection model. Infect Immun. 2005;73:1811–1819. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.3.1811-1819.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Arciola CR, Campoccia D, Baldassarri L, et al. Detection of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus epidermidis from implant infections. Comparison of a PCR-method that recognizes the presence of ica genes with two classic phenotypic methods. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006;76:425–430. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Chaieb K, Mahdouani K, Bakhrouf A. Detection of icaA and icaD loci by polymerase chain reaction and biofilm formation by Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from dialysate and needles in a dialysis unit. J Hosp Infect. 2005;61:225–230. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2005.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Hira V, Sluijter M, Estevao S, et al. Clinical and molecular epidemiologic characteristics of coagulase-negative staphylococcal bloodstream infections in intensive care neonates. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007;26:607–612. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e318060cc03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Fitzpatrick F, Humphreys H, O’Gara JP. Evidence for icaADBC-independent biofilm development mechanism in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:1973–1976. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.4.1973-1976.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Eftekhar F, Speert DP. Biofilm formation by persistent and non-persistent isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis from a neonatal intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect. 2009;71:112–116. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2008.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111•.Conrady DG, Brescia CC, Horii K, et al. A zinc-dependent adhesion module is responsible for intercellular adhesion in staphylococcal biofilms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:19456–19461. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807717105. This study describes a mechanistic basis for protein-dependent biofilm formation in S. epidermidis. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Hussain M, Herrmann M, von Eiff C, et al. A 140-kilodalton extracellular protein is essential for the accumulation of Staphylococcus epidermidis strains on surfaces. Infect Immun. 1997;65:519–524. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.2.519-524.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Banner MA, Cunniffe JG, Macintosh RL, et al. Localized tufts of fibrils on Staphylococcus epidermidis NCTC 11047 are comprised of the accumulation-associated protein. J Bacteriol. 2007;189:2793–2804. doi: 10.1128/JB.00952-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Bateman A, Holden MT, Yeats C. The G5 domain: a potential N-acetylglucosamine recognition domain involved in biofilm formation. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:1301–1303. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Rohde H, Burandt EC, Siemssen N, et al. Polysaccharide intercellular adhesin or protein factors in biofilm accumulation of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus isolated from prosthetic hip and knee joint infections. Biomaterials. 2007;28:1711–1720. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.11.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Wiederhold NP, Coyle EA, Raad, et al. Antibacterial activity of linezolid and vancomycin in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model of gram-positive catheter-related bacteraemia. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;55:792–795. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Raad I, Hanna H, Jiang Y, et al. Comparative activities of daptomycin, linezolid, and tigecycline against catheter-related methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus bacteremic isolates embedded in biofilm. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:1656–1660. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00350-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Hemels MA, Verboon-Maciolek MA, Gerards LJ, et al. Rapid clearance from the bloodstream of coagulase-negative staphylococci in infants with late-onset sepsis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28:853–854. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181b20ea9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Yao Y, Vuong C, Kocianova S, et al. Characterization of the Staphylococcus epidermidis accessory-gene regulator response: quorum-sensing regulation of resistance to human innate host defense. J Infect Dis. 2006;193:841–848. doi: 10.1086/500246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Vuong C, Gotz F, Otto M. Construction and characterization of an agr deletion mutant of Staphylococcusepidermidis. Infect Immun. 2000;68:1048–1053. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.3.1048-1053.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Vuong C, Gerke C, Somerville GA, et al. Quorum-sensing control of biofilm factors in Staphylococcusepidermidis. J Infect Dis. 2003;188:706–718. doi: 10.1086/377239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Wang R, Braughton KR, Kretschmer D, et al. Identification of novel cytolytic peptides as key virulence determinants for community-associated MRSA. Nat Med. 2007;13:1510–1514. doi: 10.1038/nm1656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Queck SY, Jameson-Lee M, Villaruz AE, et al. RNAIII-independent target gene control by the agr quorum-sensing system: insight into the evolution of virulence regulation in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Cell. 2008;32:150–158. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.O’Gara JP. ica and beyond: biofilm mechanisms and regulation in Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007;270:179–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00688.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Mack D, Rohde H, Dobinsky S, et al. Identification of three essential regulatory gene loci governing expression of Staphylococcusepidermidis polysaccharide intercellular adhesin and biofilm formation. Infect Immun. 2000;68:3799–3807. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.7.3799-3807.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Handke LD, Slater SR, Conlon KM, et al. SigmaB and SarA independently regulate polysaccharide intercellular adhesin production in Staphylococcus epidermidis. Can J Microbiol. 2007;53:82–91. doi: 10.1139/w06-108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Xu L, Li H, Vuong C, et al. Role of the luxS quorum-sensing system in biofilm formation and virulence of Staphylococcusepidermidis. Infect Immun. 2006;74:488–496. doi: 10.1128/IAI.74.1.488-496.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Vuong C, Saenz HL, Gotz F, et al. Impact of the agr quorum-sensing system on adherence to polystyrene in Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis. 2000;182:1688–1693. doi: 10.1086/317606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Vuong C, Kocianova S, Yao Y, et al. Increased colonization of indwelling medical devices by quorum-sensing mutants of Staphylococcusepidermidisin vivo. J Infect Dis. 2004;190:1498–1505. doi: 10.1086/424487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Hiramatsu K, Cui L, Kuroda M, et al. The emergence and evolution of methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Trends Microbiol. 2001;9:486–493. doi: 10.1016/s0966-842x(01)02175-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Tormo MA, Knecht E, Gotz F, et al. Bap-dependent biofilm formation by pathogenic species of Staphylococcus: evidence of horizontal gene transfer? Microbiology. 2005;151:2465–2475. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.27865-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Ma XX, Ito T, Tiensasitorn C, et al. Novel type of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec identified in community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46:1147–1152. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.4.1147-1152.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Diep BA, Stone GG, Basuino L, et al. The arginine catabolic mobile element and staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec linkage: convergence of virulence and resistance in the USA300 clone of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis. 2008;197:1523–1530. doi: 10.1086/587907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Ito T, Okuma K, Ma XX, et al. Insights on antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus from its whole genome: genomic island SCC. Drug Resist Updat. 2003;6:41–52. doi: 10.1016/s1368-7646(03)00003-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Krediet TG, Jones ME, Janssen K, et al. Prevalence of molecular types and mecA gene carriage of coagulase-negative Staphylococci in a neonatal intensive care unit: relation to nosocomial septicemia. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:3376–3378. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.9.3376-3378.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Raad I, Davis S, Khan A, et al. Impact of central venous catheter removal on the recurrence of catheter-related coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteremia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992;13:215–221. doi: 10.1086/646512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Gagnon RF, Richards GK, Subang R. Vancomycin therapy of experimental peritoneal catheter-associated infection (Staphylococcus epidermidis) in a mouse model. Perit Dial Int. 1993;13 (Suppl 2):S310–312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, et al. Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control. 1999;27:97–132. quiz 133–134; discussion 196. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Dellinger EP, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002;23:759–769. doi: 10.1086/502007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Eggimann P, Harbarth S, Constantin MN, et al. Impact of a prevention strategy targeted at vascular-access care on incidence of infections acquired in intensive care. Lancet. 2000;355:1864–1868. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02291-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Sherertz RJ, Ely EW, Westbrook DM, et al. Education of physicians-in-training can decrease the risk for vascular catheter infection. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:641–648. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-132-8-200004180-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142•.Weisman LE, Thackray HM, Garcia-Prats JA, et al. Phase 1/2 double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose escalation, safety, and pharmacokinetic study of pagibaximab (BSYX-A110), an antistaphylococcal monoclonal antibody for the prevention of staphylococcal bloodstream infections, in very-low-birth-weight neonates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:2879–2886. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01565-08. This is a vaccine trial documenting the possibility of using a monoclonal antibody against lipoteichoic acid in pre-term neonates diagnosed with S. epidermidis and CoNS sepsis. Although there was no benefit to those sick infants who received treatment over the controls, the authors showed that administration of the vaccinein neonates was safe. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Otto M. Quorum-sensing control in Staphylococci -- a target for antimicrobial drug therapy? FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2004;241:135–141. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2004.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Novick RP, Geisinger E. Quorum sensing in staphylococci. Annu Rev Genet. 2008;42:541–564. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Simor AE, Phillips E, McGeer A, et al. Randomized controlled trial of chlorhexidine gluconate for washing, intranasal mupirocin, and rifampin and doxycycline versus no treatment for the eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:178–185. doi: 10.1086/510392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]