Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Oral leukoplakia is an oral lesion with a premalignant character. Besides smoking and alcohol, diabetes could be a risk factor. The aim is to search for such an association.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
Subjects with leukoplakia (N = 123) from the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP) were matched 1:2 for age and sex with unaffected control subjects. Behavioral and lifestyle factors were assessed by a questionnaire. Lipoprotein concentrations, glycemia, and inflammation parameters were determined.
RESULTS
Subjects with oral leukoplakia showed higher levels of diabetes-related metabolites, a higher LDL/HDL cholesterol ratio (P = 0.004), and higher A1C (P = 0.002), and they were more frequently smokers (P < 0.001). Assessed by conditional logistic regression, the probability of leukoplakia increases with current smoking (odds ratio 2.20 [95% CI 1.16–4.17]) and higher levels of A1C (1.51 [95% CI 1.08–2.12]), revealing interaction between both factors (P = 0.012).
CONCLUSIONS
Diabetes is associated with the risk of oral leukoplakia, which is exaggerated by smoking. The risk is positively correlated with A1C concentrations.
Diabetes is related to different pathological states in the oral cavity including premalignant and malignant lesions (1–3). Leukoplakia is an asymptomatic, potentially malignant lesion in the oral mucosa. Between <1 and 18% of oral premalignant lesions will develop into oral cancer (4). Smoking and drinking alcohol are main risk factors for this disease (5). Even though there is a strong association between diabetes and leukoplakia, a causal mechanism for that has not been elucidated. In the present study, we assess the effect of metabolic risk factors on oral leukoplakia.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
The Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP) is a cross-sectional survey of the adult population in northeast Germany. A random sample was drawn from residents' registration offices and stratified by sex and age (20–80 years). Of the eligible individuals, 68.8% (n = 4,310) participated in this study, and 4,210 of them were screened for oral mucosal lesions (6). All participants gave written informed consent. The study was approved by the local ethics committee. Interviews were used to gain information on anamnestic, behavioral, and socio-demographic characteristics. Smoking status was assessed by self-report.
The examination of oral mucosa for lesions, oral leukoplakia, erythroplakia, lichen ruber, ulcers, and others covered all areas of the oral cavity, including the tongue and lips, and was conducted according to the guidelines of the German Cancer Association (7). Examiners were trained for consistent diagnostics with suitable patients and photographic material.
Glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C), total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol (HDL-C), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), plasma fibrinogen (using the Clauss method), and white blood cell count were assayed with standard laboratory methods, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) was assayed by immuno-nephelometry (Dade Behring, Inc.). For A1C levels, a threshold of ≥6.5% was set (8).
A total of 123 case subjects with leukoplakia simplex were identified and a 123:246 case-control study was built, matched for sex and age. We used the Mann-Whitney U test and contingence tables for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Leukoplakia was the dichotomous dependent variable in conditional logistic regression and was adjusted for matching variables and potential confounders. Data analyses were performed using STATA.
RESULTS
Among the study population, 2.9% (n = 123) of the patients had oral leukoplakia. These subjects were compared with their unaffected, matched counterparts with respect to general characteristics and clinical chemistry parameters (Table 1). We found significant differences in metabolic parameters characterizing the glucose and cholesterol metabolism. Correspondingly, among the leukoplakia cases, more subjects with type 2 diabetes were noticed. As expected, smoking was over-represented in the cases group. Markers of systemic inflammation (hs-CRP, fibrinogen) were higher in case subjects, and measures related to local oral inflammation, such as bleeding or attachment loss, were worse in cases.
Table 1.
Leukoplakia | No leukoplakia | P | |
---|---|---|---|
Subjects (female/male) (n) | 55/68 | 110/136 | § |
Age (years) | 55.2 ± 15.5 | 55.2 ± 15.6 | § |
Smokers | |||
Former (%) | 25 (20) | 55 (22) | 0.389‖ |
Current (%) | 50 (41) | 55 (22) | <0.001‖ |
Pack-years smoked | 13.8 ± 21.1 | 8.5 ± 14.3 | 0.002 |
Alcohol (g/week) | 106 ± 154 | 82 ± 115 | 0.472 |
Subjects with type 2 diabetes (%) | 27 (22) | 31 (13) | <0.001 |
A1C (%) | 6.0 ± 1.2 | 5.6 ± 1.0 | 0.002 |
Glucose (mmol/l)* | 6.5 ± 2.6 | 5.8 ± 1.7 | 0.007 |
Total cholesterol (mmol/l)* | 6.2 ± 1.3 | 5.7 ± 1.2 | 0.003 |
LDL/HDL cholesterol ratio | 3.1 ± 1.3 | 2.6 ± 1.0 | 0.004 |
LDL-C (mmol/l)* | 3.9 ± 1.2 | 3.5 ± 1.1 | 0.008 |
HDL-C (mmol/l)* | 1.4 ± 0.4 | 1.5 ± 0.4 | 0.194 |
WBC count (Tpt/l) | 7.1 ± 2.1 | 6.6 ± 1.9 | 0.087 |
hs-CRP (mg/l) | 3.4 ± 4.7 | 3.0 ± 6.0 | 0.225 |
Fibrinogen (mg/l) | 3.1 ± 0.7 | 3.0 ± 0.7 | 0.072 |
Subjects with visceral obesity (%)† | 47 (38) | 68 (28) | 0.039 |
Subjects with hypertension (%)† | 53 (43) | 97 (39) | 0.500 |
Education ≥10th grade (%) | 53 (43) | 121 (49) | 0.269 |
Last dental visit >1 year back (%) | 34 (28) | 45 (18) | <0.001 |
Mean gingival attachment loss (mm) | 3.6 ± 2.2 | 2.9 ± 2.0 | 0.012 |
Attachment loss, % of sites ≥3 (mm) | 75 (33–97) | 49 (19–89) | 0.027 |
Gingival bleeding on probing, % of sites | 46 (25–75) | 35 (12–58) | 0.010 |
Edentulous subjects (%) | 26 (21) | 41 (17) | 0.294 |
Data are means ± SD, n (%), median (interquartile range). WBC, white blood cell.
§Matching variable,
‖reference: never smokers,
*nonfasting,
†according to National Cholesterol Education Program, Adult Treatment Panel III.
In a first stratification for combined risks, we found the crude risk of leukoplakia was increased in never smokers with hyperglycemia of A1C ≥6.5% (OR 2.49 [95% CI 1.05–5.89]) comparable to the risk of normoglycemic smokers (2.21 [95% CI 1.30–3.75]). For those who have both factors combined, the risk of belonging to the leukoplakia group may be even higher (2.66 [95% CI 1.01–6.95]).
A conditional logistic regression was performed adjusting for age, former and current smoking, alcohol consumption, education, and LDL and HDL cholesterol. A1C was significantly associated with leukoplakia, indicating an increase in the probability of the outcome: A1C OR 1.51 (95% CI 1.08–2.12), thereby exhibiting significant interaction with current smoking (A1C × smoking, P = 0.012). In nonsmokers, the leukoplakia probability was low at normoglycemic state. But there was a more pronounced increase in the probability of having leukoplakia with the increasing metabolic factor A1C as compared with smokers. Smokers were at increased risk even when having low A1C levels. This was confirmed in an analysis stratified by smoking, resulting in odds ratios associated with A1C: never smokers OR = 1.96 (95% CI 1.15–3.37), ever smokers OR = 1.29 (95% CI 0.80–2.09). Similarly, LDL-C proved to be a risk factor: in never smokers OR = 3.01 (95% CI 1.40–6.50), ever smokers OR = 1.47 (95% CI 1.00–2.15).
CONCLUSIONS
Smoking and drinking alcohol have long been regarded as the sole cause in the etiology of premalignant oral mucosa lesions such as leukoplakia (5). However, in the search for further risk factors, diabetes may also be associated with the occurrence of oral leukoplakias as well. In large population studies, diabetic individuals have been reported to be over-represented in subjects with oral lesions. In the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III, an OR of ∼2 was found, suggesting that diabetes is a strong predictor of oral leukoplakia (4). Similar figures were reported in a study including more than 900 leukoplakia cases in women but not in men (3). We found evidence that diabetes-related metabolic factors are associated with the occurrence of leukoplakia most pronounced in nonsmokers. Smoking seems to override the metabolic impact. The smoke-related burden is high even at low levels of A1C or LDL-C. Chronic metabolic deteriorations may have a similar influence on the risk as lifetime exposure to tobacco smoking expressed as pack-years.
Results from the logistic regression suggest that there is a continuously increasing risk with increasing levels of A1C or of LDL-C. Accordingly, the risk seems to be related to quantitative metabolic disturbances rather than to distinct cases of diabetes. As in other tissues, the diabetic metabolism leads to profound deteriorations in the oral cavity that may predispose for oral leukoplakia (9). The association of leukoplakia with increasing LDL-C/HDL-C ratios could be explained by the disturbed lipid metabolism frequently seen in diabetic patients (10). Premalignant lesions are often associated with a background of chronic inflammation (11).
Diabetes is one of the main risk factors, besides smoking, of inflammatory periodontitis (12). The dental parameters (Table 1) indicate a possible role of local inflammation and may be related to the risks in common with diabetes (13).
Limitations of this survey are the missing biopsies for diagnosing the oral lesions and nonfasting blood analyses. Lesions were classified as clinical diagnoses, as recommended when biopsies are missing (14). The cross-sectional study design precludes causal considerations.
The results fit the hypothesis that accumulation of carbohydrates contributes to the risk of preneoplastic lesions (15). Metabolic disturbances in diabetes with interactions between systemic and local factors have manifestations in the oral cavity.
Acknowledgments
This work is part of the Community Medicine Research net of the University of Greifswald, which was funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Berlin, Germany (Grant ZZ9603); the Ministry of Cultural Affairs and the Social Ministry of the Federal State of Mecklenburg-West Pomerania, Schwerin, Germany. P.M. is supported by the German Society of Periodontology.
No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
Footnotes
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
References
- 1. Skamagas M, Breen TL, LeRoith D: Update on diabetes mellitus: prevention, treatment, and association with oral diseases. Oral Dis 2008;14:105–114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Dietrich T, Reichart PA, Scheifele C: Clinical risk factors of oral leukoplakia in a representative sample of the US population. Oral Oncol 2004;40:158–163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Dikshit RP, Ramadas K, Hashibe M, Thomas G, Somanathan T, Sankaranarayanan R: Association between diabetes mellitus and pre-malignant oral diseases: a cross sectional study in Kerala, India. Int J Cancer 2006;118:453–457 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Reibel J: Prognosis of oral pre-malignant lesions: significance of clinical, histopathological, and molecular biological characteristics. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2003;14:47–62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Lubin JH, Purdue M, Kelsey K, Zhang ZF, Winn D, Wei Q, Talamini R, Szeszenia-Dabrowska N, Sturgis EM, Smith E, Shangina O, Schwartz SM, Rudnai P, Neto JE, Muscat J, Morgenstern H, Menezes A, Matos E, Mates IN, Lissowska J, Levi F, Lazarus P, La Vecchia C, Koifman S, Herrero R, Franceschi S, Wünsch-Filho V, Fernandez L, Fabianova E, Daudt AW, Maso LD, Curado MP, Chen C, Castellsague X, Brennan P, Boffetta P, Hashibe M, Hayes RB: Total exposure and exposure rate effects for alcohol and smoking and risk of head and neck cancer: a pooled analysis of case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol 2009;170:937–947 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Hensel E, Gesch D, Biffar R, Bernhardt O, Kocher T, Splieth C, Born G, John U: Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP): a health survey in an East German region. Objectives and design of the oral health section. Quintessence Int 2003;34:370–378 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Splieth CH, Sümnig W, Bessel F, John U, Kocher T: Prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in a representative population. Quintessence Int 2007;38:23–29 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. International Expert Committee. International Expert Committee Report on the Role of the A1C Assay in the Diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009;32: 1327–1334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Ponte E, Tabaj D, Maglione M, Melato M: Diabetes mellitus and oral disease. Acta Diabetol 2001;38:57–62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Watson KE, Horowitz BN, Matson G: Lipid abnormalities in insulin resistant states. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2003;4:228–236 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Lambert R, Hainaut P, Parkin DM: Premalignant lesions of the esophagogastric mucosa. Semin Oncol 2004;31:498–512 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Pihlstrom BL, Michalowicz BS, Johnson NW: Periodontal diseases. Lancet 2005;366:1809–1820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Mealey BL, Rose LF: Diabetes mellitus and inflammatory periodontal diseases. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2008;15:135–141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. van der Waal I, Schepman KP, van der Meij EH: A modified classification and staging system for oral leukoplakia. Oral Oncol 2000;36:264–266 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Ashrafian H: Cancer's sweet tooth: the Janus effect of glucose metabolism in tumorigenesis. Lancet 2006;367:618–621 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]